1
|
Beckmann MW, Stübs FA, Koch MC, Mallmann P, Dannecker C, Dietl A, Sevnina A, Mergel F, Lotz L, Hack CC, Ehret A, Gantert D, Martignoni F, Cieslik JP, Menke J, Ortmann O, Stromberger C, Oechsle K, Hornemann B, Mumm F, Grimm C, Sturdza A, Wight E, Loessl K, Golatta M, Hagen V, Dauelsberg T, Diel I, Münstedt K, Merz E, Vordermark D, Lindel K, Wittekind C, Küppers V, Lellé R, Neis K, Griesser H, Pöschel B, Steiner M, Freitag U, Gilster T, Schmittel A, Friedrich M, Haase H, Gebhardt M, Kiesel L, Reinhardt M, Kreißl M, Kloke M, Horn LC, Wiedemann R, Marnitz S, Letsch A, Zraik I, Mangold B, Möckel J, Alt C, Wimberger P, Hillemanns P, Paradies K, Mustea A, Denschlag D, Henscher U, Tholen R, Wesselmann S, Fehm T. Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Cervical Cancer. Guideline of the DGGG, DKG and DKH (S3-Level, AWMF Registry No. 032/033OL, May 2021) – Part 1 with Recommendations
on Epidemiology, Screening, Diagnostics and Therapy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022; 82:139-180. [DOI: 10.1055/a-1671-2158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Aim This update of the interdisciplinary S3 guideline on the Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Cervical Cancer (AWMF Registry No. 032/033OL) was published in March 2021. This
updated guideline was funded by German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe) as part of the German Guideline Program in Oncology. The guideline was coordinated by the German Society of
Gynecology and Obstetrics (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, DGGG) and the Working Group on Gynecological Oncology (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische
Onkologie, AGO) of the German Cancer Society (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, DKG).
Method The process of updating the S3 guideline dating from 2014 was based on an appraisal of the available evidence using the criteria of evidence-based medicine, adaptations of
existing evidence-based national and international guidelines or – if evidence was lacking – on a consensus of the specialists involved in compiling the update. After an initial review of
the current literature was carried out according to a prescribed algorithm, several areas were identified which, in contrast to the predecessor version from September 2014, required new
recommendations or statements which took account of more recently published literature and the appraisal of the new evidence.
Recommendations The short version of this guideline consists of recommendations and statements on the epidemiology, screening, diagnostic workup and therapy of patients with cervical
cancer. The most important new aspects included in this updated guideline include the newly published FIGO classification of 2018, the radical open surgery approach for cervical cancers up
to FIGO stage IB1, and use of the sentinel lymph node technique for tumors ≤ 2 cm. Other changes include the use of PET-CT, new options in radiotherapy (e.g., intensity-modulated
radiotherapy, image-guided adaptive brachytherapy), and drug therapies to treat recurrence or metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias W. Beckmann
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Frederik A. Stübs
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Martin C. Koch
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | - Anna Dietl
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anna Sevnina
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Franziska Mergel
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Laura Lotz
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carolin C. Hack
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anne Ehret
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Frauenklinik, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Daniel Gantert
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Frauenklinik, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | - Jan Menke
- SHG-Kliniken Völklingen, Klinik für Radiologie, Völklingen, Germany
| | - Olaf Ortmann
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Tumorzentren, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karin Oechsle
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Beate Hornemann
- Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Psychoonkologischer Dienst, Dresden, Germany
| | - Friederike Mumm
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III und Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC München LMU), Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, München, Germany
| | - Christoph Grimm
- Abteilung für allgemeine Gynäkologie und gynäkologische Onkologie, Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria
| | - Alina Sturdza
- Universitätsklinikum AKH-Wien, Klinik für Radioonkologie, Wien, Austria
| | - Edward Wight
- Universitätsspital Basel, Frauenklinik, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Kristina Loessl
- Universitätsklinik Bern, Klinik für Radio-Onkologie, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael Golatta
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Frauenklinik, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volker Hagen
- St. Johannes Hospital Dortmund, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Timm Dauelsberg
- Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Klinik für Onkologische Rehabilitation, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ingo Diel
- Praxisklinik am Rosengarten, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - Eberhard Merz
- Zentrum für Ultraschalldiagnostik und Pränatalmedizin Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Dirk Vordermark
- Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Katja Lindel
- Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | | | | | - Ralph Lellé
- Universitätsklinikum Münster, Frauenklinik, Münster, Germany
| | - Klaus Neis
- Frauenärzte am Staden, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ludwig Kiesel
- Universitätsklinikum Münster, Frauenklinik, Münster, Germany
| | - Michael Reinhardt
- Pius Hospital Oldenburg, Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Michael Kreißl
- Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Marianne Kloke
- Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Klinik für Palliativmedizin, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Regina Wiedemann
- Fliedner Fachhochschule Düsseldorf, Pflegewissenschaft, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Universitätsklinikum Köln, Klinik für Radioonkologie, Cyberknife- und Strahlentherapie, Köln, Germany
| | - Anne Letsch
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Kiel, Germany
| | - Isabella Zraik
- Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Klinik für Urologie, Essen, Germany
| | | | | | - Céline Alt
- Wolfgarten Radiologie Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany
| | - Peter Hillemanns
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Frauenklinik, Hannover, Germany
| | - Kerstin Paradies
- Konferenz onkologischer Kranken- und Kinderkrankenpflege (KOK), Germany
| | | | | | - Ulla Henscher
- Deutscher Verband für Physiotherapie (ZVK) e. V., Germany
| | - Reina Tholen
- Deutscher Verband für Physiotherapie (ZVK) e. V., Germany
| | | | - Tanja Fehm
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Frauenklinik, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fehm T, Stübs FA, Koch MC, Mallmann P, Dannecker C, Dietl A, Sevnina A, Mergel F, Lotz L, Ehret A, Gantert D, Martignoni F, Cieslik JP, Menke J, Ortmann O, Stromberger C, Oechsle K, Hornemann B, Mumm F, Grimm C, Sturdza A, Wight E, Loessl K, Golatta M, Hagen V, Dauelsberg T, Diel I, Münstedt K, Merz E, Vordermark D, Lindel K, Wittekind C, Küppers V, Lellé R, Neis K, Griesser H, Pöschel B, Steiner M, Freitag U, Gilster T, Schmittel A, Friedrich M, Haase H, Gebhardt M, Kiesel L, Reinhardt M, Kreißl M, Kloke M, Horn LC, Wiedemann R, Marnitz S, Letsch A, Zraik I, Mangold B, Möckel J, Alt C, Wimberger P, Hillemanns P, Paradies K, Mustea A, Denschlag D, Henscher U, Tholen R, Wesselmann S, Beckmann MW. Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Cervical Cancer. Guideline of the DGGG, DKG and DKH (S3-Level, AWMF Registry No. 032/033OL, May 2021) – Part 2 with Recommendations
on Psycho-oncology, Rehabilitation, Follow-up, Recurrence, Palliative Therapy and Healthcare Facilities. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022; 82:181-205. [DOI: 10.1055/a-1671-2446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Aim This is an update of the interdisciplinary S3-guideline on the Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Cervical Cancer (AWMF Registry No. 032/033OL), published in March 2021. The
work on the updated guideline was funded by German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe) as part of the German Guideline Program in Oncology. The guideline was coordinated by the German
Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, DGGG) and the Working Group on Gynecological Oncology (Arbeitsgemeinschaft
Gynäkologische Onkologie, AGO) of the German Cancer Society (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, DKG).
Method The process used to update the 2014 S3-guideline was based on an appraisal of the available evidence using the criteria of evidence-based medicine, adaptations of existing
evidence-based national and international guidelines or – if evidence was lacking – on the consensus of the specialists involved in compiling the update. After an initial review of the
current literature was carried out according to a prescribed algorithm, several areas were identified which, in contrast to the predecessor version from September 2014, required new
recommendations or statements which would take account of more recently published literature and the recent appraisal of new evidence.
Recommendations The short version of this guideline consists of recommendations and statements on palliative therapy and follow-up of patients with cervical cancer. The most
important aspects included in this updated guideline are the new FIGO classification published in 2018, the radical open surgery approach used to treat cervical cancer up to FIGO stage IB1,
and the use of the sentinel lymph node technique for tumors ≤ 2 cm. Other changes include the use of PET-CT, new options in radiotherapy (e.g., intensity-modulated radiotherapy, image-guided
adaptive brachytherapy), and drug therapies to treat recurrence or metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Fehm
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Frederik A. Stübs
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Martin C. Koch
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | - Anna Dietl
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anna Sevnina
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Franziska Mergel
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Laura Lotz
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anne Ehret
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Jan Menke
- SHG-Kliniken Völklingen, Klinik für Radiologie, Völklingen, Germany
| | - Olaf Ortmann
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Tumorzentren, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karin Oechsle
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Beate Hornemann
- Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Psychoonkologischer Dienst, Dresden, Germany
| | - Friederike Mumm
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III und Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC München LMU), Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, München, Germany
| | - Christoph Grimm
- Abteilung für allgemeine Gynäkologie und gynäkologische Onkologie, Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria
| | - Alina Sturdza
- Universitätsklinikum AKH-Wien, Klinik für Radioonkologie, Wien, Austria
| | - Edward Wight
- Universitätsspital Basel, Frauenklinik, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Kristina Loessl
- Universitätsklinik Bern, Klinik für Radio-Onkologie, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael Golatta
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Frauenklinik, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volker Hagen
- St. Johannes Hospital Dortmund, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Timm Dauelsberg
- Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Klinik für Onkologische Rehabilitation, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ingo Diel
- Praxisklinik am Rosengarten, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - Eberhard Merz
- Zentrum für Ultraschalldiagnostik und Pränatalmedizin Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Dirk Vordermark
- Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Katja Lindel
- Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | | | | | - Ralph Lellé
- Universitätsklinikum Münster, Frauenklinik, Münster, Germany
| | - Klaus Neis
- Frauenärzte am Staden, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ludwig Kiesel
- Universitätsklinikum Münster, Frauenklinik, Münster, Germany
| | - Michael Reinhardt
- Pius Hospital Oldenburg, Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Michael Kreißl
- Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Marianne Kloke
- Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Klinik für Palliativmedizin, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Regina Wiedemann
- Fliedner Fachhochschule Düsseldorf, Pflegewissenschaft, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Universitätsklinikum Köln, Klinik für Radioonkologie, Cyberknife- und Strahlentherapie, Köln, Germany
| | - Anne Letsch
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Kiel, Germany
| | - Isabella Zraik
- Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Klinik für Urologie, Essen, Germany
| | | | | | - Céline Alt
- Wolfgarten Radiologie Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany
| | - Peter Hillemanns
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Frauenklinik, Hannover, Germany
| | - Kerstin Paradies
- Konferenz onkologischer Kranken- und Kinderkrankenpflege (KOK), Germany
| | | | | | - Ulla Henscher
- Hochtaunus Kliniken, Frauenklinik, Bad Homburg, Germany
| | - Reina Tholen
- Deutscher Verband für Physiotherapie (ZVK) e. V., Germany
| | | | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Freitag U. The Pathway of COVID-19 Pandemic Fear: An Experience from General Practice, Germany. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 2020; 18:1-2. [PMID: 33582678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrich Freitag
- General Practitioner, Consultant, General Medicine, Ebsdorfergrund, Bortshäuser Str, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hillemanns P, Friese K, Dannecker C, Klug S, Seifert U, Iftner T, Hädicke J, Löning T, Horn L, Schmidt D, Ikenberg H, Steiner M, Freitag U, Siebert U, Sroczynski G, Sauerbrei W, Beckmann MW, Gebhardt M, Friedrich M, Münstedt K, Schneider A, Kaufmann A, Petry KU, Schäfer APA, Pawlita M, Weis J, Mehnert A, Fehr M, Grimm C, Reich O, Arbyn M, Kleijnen J, Wesselmann S, Nothacker M, Follmann M, Langer T, Jentschke M. Prevention of Cervical Cancer: Guideline of the DGGG and the DKG (S3 Level, AWMF Register Number 015/027OL, December 2017) - Part 1 with Introduction, Screening and the Pathology of Cervical Dysplasia. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2019; 79:148-159. [PMID: 30792545 PMCID: PMC6379164 DOI: 10.1055/a-0818-5440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Revised: 12/03/2018] [Accepted: 12/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims Annual opportunistic screening for cervical carcinoma has been carried out in Germany since 1971. The creation of this S3 guideline meets an important need, outlined in the National Cancer Plan, with regard to screening for cervical cancer, as the guideline aims to provide important information and support for planned organized screening for cervical cancer in Germany. Methods With the financial support of German Cancer Aid, 21 professional societies developed evidence-based statements and recommendations (classified using the GRADE system) for the screening, management and treatment of precancerous conditions of the cervix. Two independent scientific institutes compiled systematic reviews for this guideline. Recommendations The first part of this short summary presents the pathological basis and considers various questions related to screening for cervical cancer. As also reported in earlier reviews, the meta-analysis by Kleijnen Systematic Reviews showed that HPV-based screening offers better protection against invasive cervical cancer compared to cytology-based screening. The authors of this guideline therefore recommend - in accordance with the guideline of the Joint National Committee of Germany (Gemeinsamer Bundesauschuss, G-BA) - that women aged 35 and above should be examined at regular intervals (at least every 3 years) and undergo HPV-based screening. Co-testing can also be carried out. Women between the ages of 20 and 35 should have cytological screening every 2 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Hillemanns
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Christian Dannecker
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, München, Germany
| | - Stefanie Klug
- Lehrstuhl für Epidemiologie, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Ulrike Seifert
- Tumorepidemiologie, Universitäts KrebsCentrum (UCC), Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thomas Iftner
- Institut für Medizinische Virologie und Epidemiologie der Viruskrankheiten, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Juliane Hädicke
- Institut für Medizinische Virologie und Epidemiologie der Viruskrankheiten, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Löning
- Institut für Pathologie, Albertinen-Krankenhaus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lars Horn
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Dietmar Schmidt
- Institut für Pathologie, Referenzzentrum für Gynäkopathologie, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Hans Ikenberg
- CytoMol - MVZ für Zytologie und Molekularbiologie, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Manfred Steiner
- Facharzt für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Ihringen, Germany
| | - Ulrich Freitag
- Facharzt für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Wismar, Germany
| | - Uwe Siebert
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall i. T., Austria.,Division of Health Technology Assessment and Bioinformatics, ONCOTYROL - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gaby Sroczynski
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall i. T., Austria
| | - Willi Sauerbrei
- Institut für Med. Biometrie und Statistik (IMBI), Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Karsten Münstedt
- Frauenklinik, Ortenau Klinikum Offenburg-Gengenbach, Offenburg, Germany
| | - Achim Schneider
- Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum im Fürstenberg-Karree, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Kaufmann
- Klinik für Gynäkologie, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Joachim Weis
- Klinik für Tumorbiologie, Klinik für Onkologische Rehabilitation - UKF Reha gGmbH, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anja Mehnert
- Abteilung für Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Mathias Fehr
- Gynäkologie & Geburtshilfe in Frauenfeld, Spital Thurgau AG, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
| | | | - Olaf Reich
- Privatklinik Graz Ragnitz, Graz, Austria
| | - Marc Arbyn
- Cancer Center, Sciensano, Brüssel, Belgium
| | - Jos Kleijnen
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, United Kingdom
| | | | - Monika Nothacker
- AWMF-Institut für Medizinisches Wissensmanagement, Marburg, Germany
| | - Markus Follmann
- Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Langer
- Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Jentschke
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hillemanns P, Friese K, Dannecker C, Klug S, Seifert U, Iftner T, Hädicke J, Löning T, Horn L, Schmidt D, Ikenberg H, Steiner M, Freitag U, Siebert U, Sroczynski G, Sauerbrei W, Beckmann MW, Gebhardt M, Friedrich M, Münstedt K, Schneider A, Kaufmann A, Petry KU, Schäfer APA, Pawlita M, Weis J, Mehnert A, Fehr M, Grimm C, Reich O, Arbyn M, Kleijnen J, Wesselmann S, Nothacker M, Follmann M, Langer T, Jentschke M. Prevention of Cervical Cancer: Guideline of the DGGG and the DKG (S3 Level, AWMF Register Number 015/027OL, December 2017) - Part 2 on Triage, Treatment and Follow-up. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2019; 79:160-176. [PMID: 30792546 PMCID: PMC6379166 DOI: 10.1055/a-0828-7722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Revised: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 12/20/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims Annual opportunistic screening for cervical carcinoma has been done in Germany since 1971. The creation of this S3 guideline meets an important need, outlined in the National Cancer Plan, with regard to screening for cervical cancer, as this guideline aims to provide important information and support for planned organized screening for cervical cancer in Germany. Methods With the financial support of German Cancer Aid, 21 professional societies developed evidence-based statements and recommendations (classified using the GRADE system) for the screening, management and treatment of precancerous conditions of the cervix. Two independent scientific institutes compiled systematic reviews for this guideline. Recommendations The second part of this short summary deals with the triage, treatment and follow-up care of cervical dysplasia. With regard to those women who do not participate in screening, the guideline authors recommend sending out repeat invitation letters or an HPV self-collection kit. Colposcopy should be carried out for further investigation if cytology findings are Pap II-p and HPV test results are positive or if the results of an HPV 16 or HPV 18 screening test are positive. A single abnormal Pap smear should be triaged and investigated using HPV testing or p16/Ki67 dual staining.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Hillemanns
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Christian Dannecker
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, München, Germany
| | - Stefanie Klug
- Lehrstuhl für Epidemiologie, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Ulrike Seifert
- Tumorepidemiologie, Universitäts KrebsCentrum (UCC), Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thomas Iftner
- Institut für Medizinische Virologie und Epidemiologie der Viruskrankheiten, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Juliane Hädicke
- Institut für Medizinische Virologie und Epidemiologie der Viruskrankheiten, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Löning
- Institut für Pathologie, Albertinen-Krankenhaus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lars Horn
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Dietmar Schmidt
- Institut für Pathologie, Referenzzentrum für Gynäkopathologie, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Hans Ikenberg
- CytoMol - MVZ für Zytologie und Molekularbiologie, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Manfred Steiner
- Facharzt für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Ihringen, Germany
| | - Ulrich Freitag
- Facharzt für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Wismar, Germany
| | - Uwe Siebert
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall i.T., Austria.,Division of Health Technology Assessment and Bioinformatics, ONCOTYROL - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gaby Sroczynski
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall i.T., Austria
| | - Willi Sauerbrei
- Institut für Med. Biometrie und Statistik (IMBI), Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Karsten Münstedt
- Frauenklinik, Ortenau Klinikum Offenburg-Gengenbach, Offenburg, Germany
| | - Achim Schneider
- Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum im Fürstenberg-Karree, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Kaufmann
- Klinik für Gynäkologie, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Joachim Weis
- Klinik für Tumorbiologie, Klinik für Onkologische Rehabilitation - UKF Reha gGmbH, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anja Mehnert
- Abteilung für Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Mathias Fehr
- Gynäkologie & Geburtshilfe in Frauenfeld, Spital Thurgau AG, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
| | | | - Olaf Reich
- Privatklinik Graz Ragnitz, Graz, Austria
| | - Marc Arbyn
- Cancer Center, Sciensano, Brüssel, Belgium
| | - Jos Kleijnen
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, United Kingdom
| | | | - Monika Nothacker
- AWMF-Institut für Medizinisches Wissensmanagement, Marburg, Germany
| | - Markus Follmann
- Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Langer
- Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Jentschke
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gross G, Becker N, Brockmeyer N, Esser S, Freitag U, Gebhardt M, Gissmann L, Hillemanns P, Grundhewer H, Ikenberg H, Jessen H, Kaufmann A, Klug S, Klussmann J, Nast A, Pathirana D, Petry K, Pfister H, Röllinghof U, Schneede P, Schneider A, Selka E, Singer S, Smola S, Sporbeck B, von Knebel Doeberitz M, Wutzler P. Impfprävention HPV-assoziierter Neoplasien. Laryngorhinootologie 2014; 93:848-56. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1382013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- G. Gross
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Venerologie, Universitätsmedizin, Universität Rostock, Rostock
| | - N. Becker
- Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Epidemiologie von Krebserkrankungen (C020), Heidelberg
| | - N. Brockmeyer
- Klinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie der Ruhr-Universität, Bochum
| | - S. Esser
- Klinik für Dermatologie und Venerologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen
| | | | | | - L. Gissmann
- Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), FS Infektion und Krebs, Heidelberg
| | - P. Hillemanns
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH), Frauenklinik, Abt. I für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Hannover
| | - H. Grundhewer
- Ausschuss Prävention des Berufsverbandes der Kinder- und Jugendärzte (BVKJ), Berlin
| | - H. Ikenberg
- MVZ für Zytologie und Molekularbiologie (CytoMol), Frankfurt/M
| | | | - A. Kaufmann
- Gynäkologische Tumorimmunologie, Gynäkologie mit Hochschulambulanz, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin
| | - S. Klug
- Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Dresden
| | - J. Klussmann
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Klinikum der Universität Gießen, Gießen
| | - A. Nast
- Division of Evidence Based Medicine (dEBM), Klinik für Dermatologie, Allergologie und Venerologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin
| | - D. Pathirana
- Division of Evidence Based Medicine (dEBM), Klinik für Dermatologie, Allergologie und Venerologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin
| | - K. Petry
- Klinikum Wolfsburg, Abteilung Gynäkologische Onkologie, Wolfsburg
| | - H. Pfister
- Institut für Virologie der Universität zu Köln
| | | | - P. Schneede
- Klinikum Memmingen, Klinik für Urologie, Memmingen
| | - A. Schneider
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin
| | - E. Selka
- VulvaKarzinom-SHG e. V., Wilhelmshaven
| | - S. Singer
- Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Institut für Medizinische Biometrie, Epidemiologie und Informatik, Abt. Epidemiologie und Versorgungsforschung, Mainz
| | - S. Smola
- Institut für Virologie, Institut für Infektionsmedizin, Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar
| | - B. Sporbeck
- Division of Evidence Based Medicine (dEBM), Klinik für Dermatologie, Allergologie und Venerologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin
| | - M. von Knebel Doeberitz
- Abteilung für Molekulare Pathologie, Pathologisches Institut des Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg
| | - P. Wutzler
- Universitätsklinikum Jena (Friedrich-Schiller-Universität), Institut für Virologie und Antivirale Therapie, Beutenberg Campus, Jena
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gross G, Becker N, Brockmeyer NH, Esser S, Freitag U, Gebhardt M, Gissmann L, Hillemanns P, Grundhewer H, Ikenberg H, Jessen H, Kaufmann A, Klug S, Klußmann JP, Nast A, Pathirana D, Petry KU, Pfister H, Röllinghof U, Schneede P, Schneider A, Selka E, Singer S, Smola S, Sporbeck B, von Knebel Doeberitz M, Wutzler P. Vaccination against HPV-Associated Neoplasias: Recommendations from the Current S3 Guideline of the HPV Management Forum of the Paul-Ehrlich Society - AWMF Guidelines, Registry No. 082-002 (short version), valid until Dec. 31st, 2018. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2014; 74:233-241. [PMID: 27064858 DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1360170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- G Gross
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Venerologie, Universitätsmedizin, Universität Rostock, Rostock
| | - N Becker
- Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Epidemiologie von Krebserkrankungen (C020), Heidelberg
| | - N H Brockmeyer
- Klinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie der Ruhr-Universität, Bochum
| | - S Esser
- Klinik für Dermatologie und Venerologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen
| | | | | | - L Gissmann
- Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), FS Infektion und Krebs, Heidelberg
| | - P Hillemanns
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH), Frauenklinik, Abt. I für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Hannover
| | - H Grundhewer
- Ausschuss Prävention des Berufsverbandes der Kinder- und Jugendärzte (BVKJ), Berlin
| | - H Ikenberg
- MVZ für Zytologie und Molekularbiologie (CytoMol), Frankfurt/M
| | - H Jessen
- Praxis Jessen + Kollegen, Berlin
| | - A Kaufmann
- Gynäkologische Tumorimmunologie, Gynäkologie mit Hochschulambulanz, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin
| | - S Klug
- Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Dresden
| | - J P Klußmann
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Klinikum der Universität Gießen, Gießen
| | - A Nast
- Division of Evidence Based Medicine (dEBM), Klinik für Dermatologie, Allergologie und Venerologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin
| | - D Pathirana
- Division of Evidence Based Medicine (dEBM), Klinik für Dermatologie, Allergologie und Venerologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin
| | - K U Petry
- Klinikum Wolfsburg, Abteilung Gynäkologische Onkologie, Wolfsburg
| | - H Pfister
- Institut für Virologie der Universität zu Köln
| | | | - P Schneede
- Klinikum Memmingen, Klinik für Urologie, Memmingen
| | - A Schneider
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin
| | - E Selka
- VulvaKarzinom-SHG e. V., Wilhelmshaven
| | - S Singer
- Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Institut für Medizinische Biometrie, Epidemiologie und Informatik, Abt. Epidemiologie und Versorgungsforschung, Mainz
| | - S Smola
- Institut für Virologie, Institut für Infektionsmedizin, Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar
| | - B Sporbeck
- Division of Evidence Based Medicine (dEBM), Klinik für Dermatologie, Allergologie und Venerologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin
| | - M von Knebel Doeberitz
- Abteilung für Molekulare Pathologie, Pathologisches Institut des Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg
| | - P Wutzler
- Universitätsklinikum Jena (Friedrich-Schiller-Universität), Institut für Virologie und Antivirale Therapie, Beutenberg Campus, Jena
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Staboulidou I, Freitag U, Marquardt R, Wüstemann M, Hillemanns P, Scharf A. [Quality assured ultrasound simulation training for the detection of fetal malformations--can a training benefit be evidenced?]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2006; 210:135-40. [PMID: 16941306 DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-947217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The factual sonographic training in obstetrics differs in Germany in a broad range. In this context, a tendency towards minimalistic dealings with this issue prevails. In contrast to this, the provisions of the German maternity guidelines relating to ultrasound clearly define quality oriented requirements serving altogether as a basic sonographic standard which mandatorily has to be met by all German Obstetricians. In order to close this gap between professional education and social demand, a training concept regarding obstetric ultrasound was devised by the German Association of Gynecologists utilizing the ultrasound simulator system. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness and the effectiveness of this method and its potential role and benefit in structured sonographic training. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between October 2004 and August 2005, 74 obstetric ultrasound training courses according to the ultrasound simulator concept of the Medical School of Hanover were realized in nine federal states of Germany by the German Academy of Gynecology. The aim of these courses was it to procure ultrasound knowledge regarding the structured sonographic exclusion of fetal malformations in a compact manner. As a measure of quality assurance, a standardized questionnaire was issued before and after the courses in order to analyze the benefit of these simulator-based ultrasound courses. RESULTS The concept found prevailing approval (90 %) at the level of principle, practical implementation and clinical usefulness. 88,2 % of the participants estimated their subjective training effect as being good. The analysis of the questionnaire showed a statistically significant improvement of sonographic knowledge. On average, 74.1 % of the questions were answered correctly by the end of the course as opposed to a mere 46.3 % at the beginning. CONCLUSION Structured ultrasound training courses based on the ultrasound simulator system seem to be able to define a basic quality of training and significantly improves examiners' skills in prenatal medicine possible independent of local or structural factors. Hence they seem to be a suitable instrument to close the gap between the sonographic education worthy of improvement and the existing social demand for efficiacy of obstetric sonography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Staboulidou
- Frauenklinik der Med. Hochschule Hannover, Hannover.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gross M, Buser K, Freitag U, Hess MM, Hesse V, Hildmann A, Hildmann H, Hippel K, Lenarz T, Lindbauer-Eisenach U, Plinkert P, Pohlandt F, Ptok M, Reuter G, Rossi R, Schnitzer S, Thyen U, Vetter K. Universal Hearing Screening for Babies: Recommendations for the Organization and Performance of the Universal Screening of Babies for Hereditary Hearing Disorders in Germany. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2004; 208:239-45. [PMID: 15647989 DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-835872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M Gross
- Universitätsklinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Ulm/Donau
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Horn EP, Standl T, Wilhelm S, Jacobs EE, Freitag U, Freitag M, Schulte am Esch J. [Bovine hemoglobin. HBOC-201 causes a reduction of the oxygen partial pressure in poststenotic skeletal muscle]. Anaesthesist 1998; 47:116-23. [PMID: 9530461 DOI: 10.1007/s001010050536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED We investigated the effects of ultrapurified polymerized bovine hemoglobin (HBOC-201) on skeletal muscle tissue oxygen tension when applied before establishment of a nearly complete arterial stenosis. METHODS Twelve foxhounds were anaesthetized IV and mechanically ventilated with 30% oxygen in air. Catheters were inserted into the right femoral artery and vein for measurements of haemodynamic parameters and blood-gas sampling. Arterial blood flow of the left popliteal artery was measured by an electromagnetic flow probe. Skeletal muscle tissue oxygen tension (tpo2) was measured in the left gastrocnemic muscle using a stepwise-driven polarographic needle probe, creating histograms from 200 single tpO2 measurements. Following isovolaemic haemodilution with Ringer's solution to a target haematocrit of 20%, the animals were randomly assigned to receive either 200 ml of predonated fresh blood (group 1) or 200 ml of HBOC-201 (MW 32,000-500,000; Hb 13 +/- 1 g-dl-1, group 2). After a 15-min stabilization period, a 95% artificial stenosis of the left popliteal artery was established. While animals of group 1 received two applications of 200 ml 6% hetastarch (HES, 200,000; 0.5), animals of group 2 received 200 ml Ringer's solution 45 and 75 min after establishment of the arterial stenosis, respectively. Variables were measured at baseline, after haemodilution and application of the respective compound, and 30, 60 and 90 min after establishment of the stenosis. RESULTS Demographic data, muscle temperature and arterial blood gases did not differ between groups. With the exception of a higher mean pulmonary artery pressure in HBOC-201-treated animals, haemodynamics did not differ between groups. In both groups oxygen delivery and oxygen consumption of the muscle decreased in parallel to the decreasing blood flow during arterial stenosis. In contrast, oxygen extraction ratio increased after infusion of HBOC-201 and remained unchanged during stenosis (P < 0.05). In group 1, the tpO2 decreased during stenosis when compared to baseline (P < 0.001) and remained decreased after administration of HES. In contrast, administration of 200 ml of HBOC-201 before establishment of the arterial stenosis sustained the tpO2 values at nearly baseline levels during stenosis. Skeletal muscle tissue oxygen tension was higher after HBOC-201 infusion during stenosis when compared to HES infusion (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION These data suggest that haemoglobin solutions can reach poststenotic tissues. The increased oxygen extraction after application of HBOC-201 is associated with improved skeletal muscle oxygen tension during severe arterial stenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E P Horn
- Abteilung für Anästhesiologie, Universitäts-Krankenhaus Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Horn EP, Standl T, Wilhelm S, Jacobs EE, Freitag U, Freitag M, Schulte am Esch J. Bovine hemoglobin increases skeletal muscle oxygenation during 95% artificial arterial stenosis. Surgery 1997; 121:411-8. [PMID: 9122871 DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6060(97)90311-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigates the effect of a stroma-free ultrapurified bovine hemoglobin solution (HBOC) on skeletal muscle tissue oxygenation in comparison with hetastarch during nearly complete arterial stenosis. METHODS Fourteen foxhounds were intravenously anesthetized and mechanically ventilated with 30% oxygen in air. Catheters were inserted into the right femoral artery and vein for measurements of hemodynamic parameters and blood gas sampling. Arterial blood flow of the left popliteal artery was measured by means of an electromagnetic flow probe. Skeletal muscle tissue oxygen tension (tpO2) was measured in the left gastrocnemius muscle by using a stepwise driven polarographic needle probe creating histograms from 200 single tpO2 measurements. After isovolemic hemodilution with Ringer's lactate solution to a hematocrit of 25%, a 95% artificial stenosis of the popliteal artery was established. The animals then randomly received two applications of either 50 ml HBOC (molecular weight, 32,000 to 500,000; hemoglobin, 13 +/- 1 gm/dl-1) or 200 ml 6% hetastarch 200,000/0.5. Variables were measured at baseline, after hemodilution, 30 minutes after stenosis, and 15 minutes after two applications of the respective compound. RESULTS Demographic data, muscle temperature, and arterial blood gases did not differ between groups. With the exception of higher mean arterial and mean pulmonary artery pressures in HBOC-treated animals, hemodynamics did not differ between groups. In both groups oxygen delivery and oxygen consumption of the muscle decreased in parallel to the decreasing blood flow during arterial stenosis. In contrast, oxygen extraction ratio increased after infusion of HBOC and was higher after the second application when compared with hetastarch-treated animals (p < 0.05). During stenosis tpO2 was decreased in both groups when compared with baseline (p < 0.001). Mean tpO2 remained at decreased levels after administration of hetastarch but increased to nearly baseline values after HBOC treatment (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The data suggest that increased oxygen extraction in the HBOC group is associated with improved skeletal muscle tissue oxygenation during severe arterial stenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E P Horn
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Standl T, Horn P, Wilhelm S, Greim C, Freitag M, Freitag U, Sputtek A, Jacobs E, Schulte am Esch J. Bovine haemoglobin is more potent than autologous red blood cells in restoring muscular tissue oxygenation after profound isovolaemic haemodilution in dogs. Can J Anaesth 1996; 43:714-23. [PMID: 8807179 DOI: 10.1007/bf03017957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study compares the effects of stored red cells, freshly donated blood and ultrapurified polymerized bovine haemoglobin (HBOC) on haemodynamic variables, oxygen transport capacity and muscular tissue oxygenation after acute and almost complete isovolaemic haemodilution in a canine model. METHODS Following randomization to one of three groups, 24 anaesthetized Foxhounds underwent isovolaemic haemodilution with 6% hetastarch to haematocrit levels of 20%, 15% and 10% before they received isovolaemic stepwise augmentation of 1 g.dl-1 haemoglobin. In Group 1, animals were given autologous stored red cells which they had donated three weeks before. In Group 2, animals received freshly donated blood harvested during haemodilution. In Group 3, animals were infused with HBOC. Skeletal muscle tissue oxygen tension was measured with a polarographic 12 mu needle probe. RESULTS In all groups, heart rate and cardiac index were increased with decreasing vascular resistance during haemodilution (P < 0.05). Haemodynamic variables showed a reversed trend during transfusion when compared to haemodilution but remained below baseline (P < 0.05). Arterial and venous oxygen content were changed in parallel to changes of haematocrit and haemoglobin concentrations but were lower in Group 3 than in Groups 1 and 2 (P < 0.05) during transfusion. In contrast, the oxygen extraction ratio was higher in Group 3 (59 +/- 8%, P < 0.01) at the end of transfusion than in Group 1 (37 +/- 13%) and 2 (32 +/- 5%). In Group 3, mean tissue oxygen tension increased from 16 +/- 5 mmHg after haemodilution to 56 +/- 11 mmHg after transfusion (P < 0.01) and was higher than in Group 1 (41 +/- 9, P < 0.01) and Group 2 (29 +/- 11, P < 0.01). While in Group 3 an augmentation of 0.7 g.dl-1 haemoglobin resulted in restoring baseline tissue oxygenation, higher doses of 2.7 g.dl-1 and 2.1 g.dl-1 were needed in Groups 1 and 2 to reach this level (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION The results show a higher oxygenation potential of HBOC than with autologous stored red cells because of a more pronounced oxygen extraction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Standl
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hunold W, Wilmanns I, Freitag U. [Spatial arrangement and inner wall surface of ocular vessels. Scanning electronmicroscopy of vascular casts (author's transl)]. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 1978; 206:71-8. [PMID: 306774 DOI: 10.1007/bf00414615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Vascular corrosion casts of the rabbit eye vessels were studied by scanning electron microscopy. Compared with light micrescopy, this method provides great depth of field and better contrast. Thus the pictures are more informative and documentation is easier. The high resolving power of scanning electron microscopy of suitable vascular casts allows the study of structures of the inner vessel wall. Such information could not be retrieved from these replicas until now.
Collapse
|
14
|
Hunold W, Weigelin E, Freitag U, Wilmanns I. Studies on the iris and ciliary body vessels of the rabbit. Exp Eye Res 1977. [DOI: 10.1016/0014-4835(77)90236-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|