Predicting the CD34 content of mobilized peripheral blood leukapheresis products: single institution experience over 20 years

BACKGROUND AIMS

Since the standardization of CD34 measurement by flow cytometry, predictors of leukapheresis CD34 yield have played a pivotal role in planning donor leukaphereses. We describe here a single institution's experience with a multivariate predictor that was used for 2,929 products without alteration for 20 years.

METHODS

The ordinary least squares regression model variables included log peripheral CD34 count, collection duration (3- versus 4-hours), collection number, donor sex, and transplant type.

RESULTS

During the study period we changed flow cytometers twice and leukapheresis instruments once. During the Cobe Spectra era the predictor explained 90% of the variability in CD34 collection yield for autologous transplants (r2 = 0.90), and 70% for allogeneic transplants with an overall sensitivity to predict a CD34 yield of ≥ 1 × 106/kg of 97.7%, and specificity of 81.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Implemented prospectively with real-time result reporting, the model allowed us to predict CD34 yield with both 3- and 4-hour collection scenarios. Given this guidance, 3-hour collections were selected by the clinical team 25% of the time, saving patient leukapheresis time and resources. When faced with a prediction of < 1 × 106 CD34/kg, the clinical team chose to defer collection 72% of the time. In instances where leukapheresis was performed despite a poor predicted outcome, 85% of patients collected on the Cobe Spectra, and 92% of patients collected on the Optia, failed to collect at least 1 × 106 CD34/kg. A revised model is tested retrospectively on Optia data, and suggestions for further improvements are discussed.

Donor Cell Leukemia Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Approximately 25,000 allogeneic transplants are performed annually worldwide; a figure that has steadily increased over the past three decades. The study of transplant recipient survivorship has become a cogent topic and post-transplant donor cell pathology warrants further study. Donor cell leukemia (DCL) is a rare but serious complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) where the recipient develops a form leukemia originating from the donor cells used for transplantation. Detection of abnormalities predicting donor cell pathology might inform donor selection, and the design of survivorship programs for early detection of these abnormalities might allow therapeutic intervention earlier in the disease course. We present four recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) from our institution who developed donor cell abnormalities allogeneic SCT, highlighting their clinical characteristics and challenges.

Treatment Selection and Survival in Patients with Gray Zone Lymphoma: A Comprehensive Population-Based Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There are no treatment guidelines for gray-zone lymphoma (GZL), given the disease's rarity and being a relatively new entity. Our objective was to assess factors affecting treatment selection in GZL and its effect on survival, focusing on combined modality treatment (CMT) versus chemotherapy alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified 1047 patients with GZL treated with CMT or chemotherapy alone between 2004 and 2016 from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). We excluded patients without histologic confirmation of the diagnosis, those who did not receive chemotherapy, and those who started chemotherapy >120 days or radiation >365 days from diagnosis to account for immortal time bias. Factors affecting treatment selection were investigated using a logistic regression model. A propensity score-matched methodology was used to compare survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Only 164 patients (15.7%) received CMT, while 883 (84.3%) received chemotherapy alone. Treatment selection was affected by clinical factors (age, odds ratio [OR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-0.997, p-value 0.01 and advanced stage, OR for stage 4: 0.21, 95% CI 0.13-0.34, p-value < 0.001) but not socioeconomic factors. Higher median income was associated with better survival, while increased age, higher comorbidity score, and B symptoms were associated with worse survival. The use of CMT had a survival advantage over chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR] 0.54, 95% CI 0.351-0.833, p-value 0.005).

CONCLUSION

CMT is associated with survival advantage in our analysis. Careful selection of patients is essential to achieve the best outcomes with minimal toxicity. Socioeconomic factors affect treatment selection in patients with GZL that can alter outcomes. Future work should focus on strategies that access disparities without compromising survival.

Rituximab Chimeric Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody Therapy for Relapsed Indolent Lymphoma: Half of Patients Respond to a Four-Dose Treatment Program

PURPOSE

The CD20 antigen is expressed on more than 90% of B-cell lymphomas. It is appealing for targeted therapy, because it does not shed or modulate. A chimeric monoclonal antibody more effectively mediates host effector functions and is itself less immunogenic than are murine antibodies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a multiinstitutional trial of the chimeric anti-CD20 antibody, IDEC-C2B8. Patients with relapsed low grade or follicular lymphoma received an outpatient treatment course of IDEC-C2B8 375 mg/m2 intravenously weekly for four doses.

RESULTS

From 31 centers, 166 patients were entered. Of this intent-to-treat group, 48% responded. With a median follow-up duration of 11.8 months, the projected median time to progression for responders is 13.0 months. Serum antibody levels were sustained longer after the fourth infusion than after the first, and were higher in responders and in patients with lower tumor burden. The majority of adverse events occurred during the first infusion and were grade 1 or 2; fever and chills were the most common events. Only 12% of patients had grade 3 and 3% grade 4 toxicities. A human antichimeric antibody was detected in only one patient.

CONCLUSION

The response rate of 48% with IDEC-C2B8 is comparable to results with single-agent cytotoxic chemotherapy. Toxicity was mild. Attention needs to be paid to the rate of antibody infusion, with titration according to toxicity. Further investigation of this agent is warranted, including its use in conjunction with standard chemotherapy.

A maladaptive pleural environment suppresses preexisting anti-tumor activity of pleural infiltrating T cells

Introduction

Treatment options for patients with malignant pleural effusions (MPE) are limited due, at least in part, to the unique environment of the pleural space, which drives an aggressive tumor state and governs the behavior of infiltrating immune cells. Modulation of the pleural environment may be a necessary step toward the development of effective treatments. We examine immune checkpoint molecule (ICM) expression on pleural T cells, the secretomes of pleural fluid, pleural infiltrating T cells (PIT), and ability to activate PIT ex vivo.

Methods

ICM expression was determined on freshly drained and in vitro activated PIT from breast, lung and renal cell cancer. Secretomics (63 analytes) of activated PIT, primary tumor cultures and MPE fluid was determined using Luminex technology. Complementary digital spatial proteomic profiling (42 analytes) of CD45+ MPE cells was done using the Nanostring GeoMx platform. Cytolytic activity was measured against autologous tumor targets.

Results

ICM expression was low on freshy isolated PIT; regulatory T cells (T-reg) were not detectable by GeoMx. In vitro activated PIT coexpressed PD-1, LAG-3 and TIGIT but were highly cytotoxic against autologous tumor and uniquely secreted cytokines and chemokines in the > 100 pM range. These included CCL4, CCL3, granzyme B, IL-13, TNFα, IL-2 IFNγ, GM-CSF, and perforin. Activated PIT also secreted high levels of IL-6, IL-8 and sIL-6Rα, which contribute to polarization of the pleural environment toward wound healing and the epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Addition of IL-6Rα antagonist to cultures reversed tumor EMT but did not alter PIT activation, cytokine secretion or cytotoxicity.

Discussion

Despite the negative environment, immune effector cells are plentiful, persist in MPE in a quiescent state, and are easily activated and expanded in culture. Low expression of ICM on native PIT may explain reported lack of responsiveness to immune checkpoint blockade. The potent cytotoxic activity of activated PIT and a proof-of-concept clinical scale GMP-expansion experiment support their promise as a cellular therapeutic. We expect that a successful approach will require combining cellular therapy with pleural conditioning using immune checkpoint blockers together with inhibitors of upstream master cytokines such as the IL-6/IL-6R axis.

Consolidative Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Versus Whole Brain Radiation in PCNSL; a Nationwide Analysis

BACKGROUND

The best consolidation strategy after induction chemotherapy in Primary CNS Lymphoma (PCNSL) remains controversial. Our objective is to estimate the overall survival (OS) for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) versus whole brain radiation (WBRT) in the consolidation setting. We also sought to evaluate the factors affecting treatment selection METHODS: We identified 1620 patients with PCNSL who received chemotherapy followed by either ASCT or WBRT between 2004 and 2015 from the National Cancer Database. A propensity score weighting methodology was used to compare survival outcomes. Factors affecting treatment selection were investigated using a logistic regression model. Annual percentage change (APC) was calculated to assess the trend of ASCT use.

RESULTS

Only 12.2% of patients received ASCT, and this proportion rose steadily between 2004 and 2015, with APC of +23%. Treatment selection was affected by age, type of area, distance from the treating facility, and level of education. With a median follow-up of 68.4 months, adjusted-median OS was 91.4 months and not reached for WBRT and ASCT groups, respectively (P < .001). 5-year OS was 74.4% in the ASCT group versus 58.7% in the WBRT group (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.27-0.60, P -value < .01).

CONCLUSION

Socioeconomic factors affect the selection of consolidative treatment in patients with PCNSL which can alter outcomes. Frequency of consolidative ASCT is increasing for patients with PCNSL. This is the first and largest cohort study, to our knowledge, to show an OS advantage in favor of ASCT. This OS benefit needs to be confirmed in a randomized controlled fashion.

The lived experience of severe mental illness and long-term conditions: a qualitative exploration of service user, carer, and healthcare professional perspectives on self-managing co-existing mental and physical conditions

BACKGROUND

People with severe mental illness (SMI), such as schizophrenia, have higher rates of physical long-term conditions (LTCs), poorer health outcomes, and shorter life expectancy compared with the general population. Previous research exploring SMI and diabetes highlights that people with SMI experience barriers to self-management, a key component of care in long-term conditions; however, this has not been investigated in the context of other LTCs. The aim of this study was to explore the lived experience of co-existing SMI and LTCs for service users, carers, and healthcare professionals.

METHODS

A qualitative study with people with SMI and LTCs, their carers, and healthcare professionals, using semi-structured interviews, focused observations, and focus groups across the UK. Forty-one interviews and five focus groups were conducted between December 2018 and April 2019. Transcripts were coded by two authors and analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Three themes were identified, 1) the precarious nature of living with SMI, 2) the circularity of life with SMI and LTCs, and 3) the constellation of support for self-management. People with co-existing SMI and LTCs often experience substantial difficulties with self-management of their health due to the competing demands of their psychiatric symptoms and treatment, social circumstances, and access to support. Multiple long-term conditions add to the burden of self-management. Social support, alongside person-centred professional care, is a key facilitator for managing health. An integrated approach to both mental and physical healthcare was suggested to meet service user and carer needs.

CONCLUSION

The demands of living with SMI present a substantial barrier to self-management for multiple co-existing LTCs. It is important that people with SMI can access person-centred, tailored support for their LTCs that takes into consideration individual circumstances and priorities.

Patterns of treatment and their outcomes in primary breast lymphoma; a comprehensive population-based analysis

BACKGROUND

Primary breast lymphoma (PBL) is managed differently among centers, using surgery, systemic therapy and/or radiation. With data derived from the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we aim to describe treatments utilized in the United States, estimate the overall survival (OS) of different therapeutic modalities and determine the role of systemic therapy in patients with PBL.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using de-identified data from the NCDB. The NCDB provided records of 4616 patients diagnosed with PBL between 2004 and 2015. We excluded patients diagnosed with HIV, with no survival data, not treated in the reporting facility, without histologic confirmation, with stage III/ IV disease and for whom surgery, radiation, or systemic therapy was contraindicated. Both propensity score weighting and Cox models were used to obtain adjusted estimates. Based on histopathology, PBL was classified into indolent (I-PBL) and aggressive (A-PBL).

RESULTS

In a sample size of 2063 PBL patients, the median age was 67 years (interquartile range (IQR): 57-78), and 97% were females. In 1027 patients with I-PBL, the median follow-up was 66 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 32.6-107.2) and 60% of patients had extranodal marginal zone subtype. Systemic therapy did not improve adjusted-OS (median: 154 vs. 143 months, P = 0.36) (Hazard ratio (HR): 0.86, 95% CI: 0.60-1.25, P = 0.42). The treatment arms associated with the highest adjusted 5-year OS were as follows: radiation (85%), surgery (79%), systemic & radiation (87%) and radiation & surgery (87%) (P = 0.9). In 1036 patients with A-PBL, the median follow-up was 67.4 months (95% CI: 35.9-105), and 87% of patients had diffuse large B-cell subtype. Patients with A-PBL who received systemic therapy had an improved adjusted-OS (median: 115 vs. 72 months, P < 0.01) (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.38-0.53, P < 0.001). The treatment arms associated with the highest adjusted 5-year OS were: systemic (69%), systemic & radiation (77%), systemic & radiation & surgery (79%) and systemic & surgery (79%) (P = 0.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic therapy used as first-line treatment is essential in A-PBL. Local therapy in the I-PBL using surgery and/or radiation is effective in long-term disease control. There is significant variation in front-line treatment modalities utilized in PBL across the US, many associated with similar outcomes.

Predictors and Long-Term Outcomes for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Patients Undergoing Surgery Prior to Systemic Therapy: A Nationwide Analysis

BACKGROUND

A minority of patients diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) undergo surgery before the initiation of systemic therapy. The aim of this study is to explore the characteristics of patients undergoing surgery prior to systemic therapy (surgfirst), the predictors for surgfirst, and the survival outcomes.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with DLBCL diagnosed between 2006 and 2015, and we performed a subgroup analysis of patients that received surgfirst. Time-to-initial therapy (TTI) was defined as the time in days (d) from diagnosis to systemic therapy. Overall survival was measured from the day of diagnosis in terms of months (m).

RESULTS

Factors associated with lower likelihood of surgfirst were non-Hispanic Black race (p-value<0.005), rural location (p-value<0.005), treatment at academic center (p-value<0.005), Medicaid insurance (p-value=0.01), comorbidity score >=3 (p-value 0.007), year of diagnosis, advanced stages of disease, and presence of B-symptoms. The TTI of systemic therapy was delayed in the surgfirst group - 34 (IQR 22-52) days vs. 23 (IQR 13-38) days, p-value<0.005. The five-year overall survival was 62.7% (95% CI 62.1-63.2%) vs. 58.3% (95% CI 57.7-60.0%) - HR 0.87 (95% CI 0.85-0.89), p-value<0.005. The factors associated with higher mortality were advanced comorbidities, lower educational status, disease primarily located in the bone, brain, and spinal cord, advanced clinical stage, presence of B-symptoms, and advanced age.

CONCLUSION

Despite the delay in systemic therapy, we could not identify a detrimental impact of surgfirst on survival. This needs to be confirmed in large-scale multicenter studies. We identified clinical and socioeconomic factors that affect treatment selection and survival.

The Trend of Combined Modality Treatment and its Outcomes in Elderly Patients With Primary CNS Lymphoma: A 12-year Population-based Analysis Using Propensity Score

BACKGROUND/AIM

The addition of radiation to chemotherapy in elderly patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) remains controversial. This aim of this study was to assess the trend of combined modality treatment (CMT) and compare its survival with chemotherapy alone and radiation alone in non-HIV patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified 6,537 patients who received single treatment modality, CMT, or no treatment at all between 2004 and 2015 from the National Cancer Database. Factors affecting treatment selection were investigated using a logistic regression model. Annual percentage change (APC) was calculated to assess the trend of CMT use. A propensity score weighting methodology was used to compare survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Only 12.8% of patients received CMT, and this proportion steadily declined between 2004 (17.7%) and 2015 (8.7%), with an APC of -6.0% (95%CI=-8.0 - -4.0, p-value <0.001) during the 12 years. Apart from classical prognostic factors (age and comorbidities), treatment selection was significantly influenced by sex, facility type, degree of urbanization, and type of insurance. CMT had improved survival [median overall survival 19.5 months (95%CI=15.7-22.8)] compared with single-modality treatment. This effect was more prominent in the first year.

CONCLUSION

Socioeconomic factors affect the selection of treatment in elderly patients with PCNSL. CMT is falling out of favor in this patient population due to the risks of neurotoxicity. Further work should focus on developing strategies that minimize toxicity and access disparities without compromising survival.

Three Cases of Lenalidomide Therapy for Multiple Myeloma and Subsequent Development of Secondary B-ALL

Introduction

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematological malignancy, accounting for 1% of all cancers, with median age of diagnosis between 66–70 years. MM remains incurable despite advances in treatment over time. Lenalidomide is an important medication used in induction therapy for MM and is also used for maintenance therapy for standard risk patients. With its increasing use, data is emerging about its use being associated with increased risk of secondary primary malignancies (SPM), especially when used as maintenance therapy. Case series: In this case series, we describe three patients with refractory MM treated with lenalidomide maintenance who later developed sALL. All had a common presentation of pancytopenia. They developed cytopenias while being on lenalidomide which was refractory to lenalidomide cessation, prompting bone marrow biopsy. Management and outcome: Lenalidomide was subsequently stopped, and patients were treated for secondary B-ALL. However, all passed away either due to relapse of disease or complications arising from treatment. Discussion: The mechanism of lenalidomide associated SPMs is not well understood however its incidence is well documented. At least 13 cases of ALL (predominantly B-cell ALL) following Immunomodulator imide drugs (IMiDs) have been reported in literature. An analysis of a larger cohort of patients is required to determine causality of lenalidomide with sALL. However, benefits of maintenance lenalidomide in patients with MM outweighs the risk of developing SPMs. Albeit persistent pancytopenia on lenalidomide therapy should be evaluated with bone marrow biopsy since it could be caused by secondary B -cell ALL.

Effect of time to relapse on overall survival in patients with mantle cell lymphoma following autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation

In young and fit patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), intensive induction therapy followed by a consolidative autologous haematopoietic cell transplant (autoHCT) is the standard of care in the front-line setting. Recently, time-to-event analysis has emerged as an important risk assessment tool in lymphoma, though its impact in MCL is not well defined. We utilized the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database to evaluate the effect of post-autoHCT time to relapse on overall survival (OS) over time in 461 patients who underwent autoHCT within 12 months of MCL diagnosis. On multivariate analysis, the impact of relapse on OS was greatest at the six-month [hazard ratio (HR) = 7·68], 12-month (HR = 6·68), and 18-month (HR = 5·81) landmark timepoints. Using a dynamic landmark model we demonstrate that adjusted OS at five years following each landmark timepoint improved with time for relapsing and non-relapsing patients. Furthermore, early relapse (<18 months) following autoHCT defines a high-risk group with inferior post-relapse OS. This retrospective analysis highlights the impact of time to relapse on OS in MCL patients undergoing up-front autoHCT and emphasizes the need to consider novel therapeutic approaches for patients suffering early relapse.

Open-Label Phase II Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study of Romyelocel-L Myeloid Progenitor Cells to Reduce Infection During Induction Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

PURPOSE

Standard cytotoxic induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) results in prolonged neutropenia and risk of infection. Romyelocel-L is a universal, allogeneic myeloid progenitor cell product being studied to reduce infection during induction chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred sixty-three patients with de novo AML (age ≥ 55 years) receiving induction chemotherapy were randomly assigned on day 0 (d0), of whom 120 were evaluable. Subjects received either romyelocel-L infusion on d9 with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) starting daily d14 (treatment group) or G-CSF daily alone on d14 (control) until absolute neutrophil count recovery to 500/µL. End points included days in febrile episode, microbiologically defined infections, clinically diagnosed infection, and days in hospital.

RESULTS

Mean days in febrile episode was shorter in the treatment arm from d15 through d28 (2.36 v 3.90; P = .02). Similarly, a trend toward decreased microbiologically defined infections and clinically diagnosed infection in the treatment arm was observed from d9 to d28 (35.6% v 47.5%; P = .09), reaching a statistically significant difference from d15 to d28 (6.8% v 27.9%; P = .002). Because of this, antibacterial or antifungal use for treatment of an infection was significantly less in the treatment group (d9-d28: 44.1% v 63.9%; P = .01). Significantly fewer patients in the treatment arm received empiric antifungals from d9 tod28 (42.4% v 63.9%; P = .02) and d15-d28 (42.4% v 62.3%; P = .02). Patients in the treatment arm also had 3.2 fewer hospital days compared with control (25.5 v 28.7; P = .001). Remission rates and days to absolute neutrophil count recovery were similar in the two groups. No patients in the romyelocel-L plus G-CSF group died because of infection compared with two patients in the control arm. No graft-versus-host disease was observed.

CONCLUSION

Subjects receiving romyelocel-L showed a decreased incidence of infections, antimicrobial use, and hospitalization, suggesting that romyelocel-L may provide a new option to reduce infections in patients with AML undergoing induction therapy.

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) versus whole brain radiation (WBRT) as a consolidation therapy in primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL): A nationwide analysis

2062

Background: High dose methotrexate-based regimens remain the most effective treatment against PCNSL but optimal consolidative strategy has yet to be determined. There is lack of high scale clinical trials comparing WBRT versus ASCT as consolidation therapy. Only two phase II randomized clinical trials (PRECIS and IELSG 32) have addressed this question. In this comprehensive national cancer database (NCDB) analysis, we examine the effect of WBRT versus ASCT on survival in PCNSL, we also sought to investigate clinical and socioeconomic predictors of treatment selection Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using de-identified data accessed from the NCDB. The NCDB provided records of 16579 patients diagnosed with PCNSL between 2004 and 2016. We excluded patients who tested positive for HIV, and those who started chemotherapy > 120 days or started radiation > 365 days since diagnosis, to account for immortal time bias. Patients were divided into two treatment groups based on consolidation therapy: ASCT and WBRT. Multivariable regression models were used to analyze predictors of treatment selection. To account for variable baseline characteristics, we used propensity score weighting methodology. Survival estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression methods Results: We identified 1620 patients with PCNSL who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. ASCT and WBRT were received by 197 patients and 1423 patients, respectively (Table). On multivariable analysis, increased age decreased the odds of receiving ASCT (OR 0.997, CI: 0.996-0.999, P <.001). Patients live in rural areas (OR 1.174, CI: 1.051-1.312, P=.005), those with higher education (OR 1.089, CI: 1.020-1.163, P=.01), and those who live further from the treating facility (OR 1.001, CI: 1.001-1.001, P<.001) received more ASCT. With a median follow up duration of 27.8 months, adjusted-median OS was 91.4 months and not reached for WBRT and ASCT groups, respectively (log-rank P<.001). Adjusted 3-year OS was 82% and 67% in ASCT and WBRT, respectively (HR: 0.43, CI: 0.29-0.64, P<.001) Conclusions: Consolidation with ASCT had improved OS compared with WBRT. There is a trend toward increased ASCT use and decreased WBRT use over the study period. We found clinical and socioeconomic factors that affected treatment selection.[Table: see text]

Rapid rituximab infusion is safe and well tolerated in malignant and benign disease

INTRODUCTION

Although the safety and feasibility of rapid rituximab administration has been demonstrated for B-cell malignancies, there is scant data in the literature to support its use in patients with benign diseases.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the incidence of infusion-related reaction with rapid rituximab administration in malignant and benign disease. Secondary objective was to determine the infusion time saved between standard administration and rapid rituximab administration.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted by reviewing electronic medical records from December 2018 to April 2020. Adult patients who received at least one dose of rapid rituximab were included.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patents were included. The incidence of an infusion-related reaction with rapid rituximab was 1.6%. The one patient who reacted had a diagnosis of neuromyelitis optica. The mean infusion time saved was 2.9 hours (95% CI: 2.7-3.1; P-value <0.001).

CONCLUSION

The use of the rapid rituximab administration is safe and well tolerated in both benign and malignant disease.

Disparities in the enrollment to systemic therapy and survival for patients with multiple myeloma

Background

Disparities driven by socioeconomic factors have been shown to impact outcomes for cancer patients. We sought to explore this relationship among patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who were not considered for hematopoietic stem cell transplant in the first-line setting and how it varied over time.

Methods

We queried the National Cancer Database for patients diagnosed with MM between 2004 and 2016 and included only those who received systemic therapy as the first-line treatment. Enrollment rates for therapy were calculated as receipt of systemic therapy as the incident event of interest (numerator) over time to initiation of therapy (denominator) and used to calculate incident rate ratios that were further analyzed using Poisson regression analysis. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was constructed for survival analysis, and differences were reported as hazard ratios (HRs).

Results

We identified 56,102 patients for enrollment analysis and 50,543 patients for survival analysis. Therapy enrollment in a multivariate model was significantly impacted by race and sex (p < .005). Advanced age, earlier year of diagnosis, lack of insurance or Medicaid, and higher comorbidity were associated with poor survival (HR > 1), whereas female sex, non-Hispanic black race, higher income, and treatment at an academic center were associated with improved survival (HR < 1).

Conclusion

Disparities in treatment of MM exist and are caused by a complex interplay of multiple factors, with socioeconomic factor playing a significant role. Studies exploring such determinants may help in equitable distribution of resources to overcome such differences.

The Integration of PD1 blockade with epigenetic therapy is highly active and safe in heavily treated patients with T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL)

8049

Background: Our group has demonstrated that combinations of epigenetic modifiers produce potent synergy in pre-clinical models of PTCL and induce the expression of cancer testis antigen, suggesting a role in the addition of the immune-checkpoint inhibitor, pembrolizumab. Methods: This is a phase 1b study of pembrolizumab combined with pralatrexate alone (Arm A), with pralatrexate + decitabine (Arm B), or decitabine alone (Arm C) in patients with relapsed and refractory PTCL and CTCL. A standard 3+3 dose-escalation is applied in the triplet Arm (Arm B) while in the doublet Arms (A and C) de-escalation is applied in case of toxicity. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies are ongoing. Results: We treated a total of 12 patients with 4 patients in each Arm. All patients that received at least one dose of drug were evaluable for toxicity. There was a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) in each arm including prolonged grade 3 thrombocytopenia (Arm A), febrile neutropenia (Arm B), grade 3 hyponatremia, and rash (Arm C). There were no treatment-related deaths. Six patients out of 12 were evaluable for response at the time of this analysis. One patient achieved a complete remission, 2 had partial remission, 1 had stable disease, and 2 experienced progression of disease. Interestingly, all of the responses were seen in the triple combination of pralatrexate, decitabine, and pembrolizumab. Table summarizes the patient characteristics, toxicities, and response rates. Conclusions: These preliminary clinical data suggest that the integration of pembrolizumab on an epigenetic backbone is safe and demonstrates encouraging responses in patient with PTCL and CTCL. Clinical trial information: 03240211 . [Table: see text]

Abstract A072: Preliminary results of ASTX660, a novel non-peptidomimetic cIAP1/2 and XIAP antagonist, in 107 patients with solid tumors or lymphoma

Background: ASTX660 is an oral, novel nonpeptidomimetic, small-molecule antagonist of cellular/X-linked inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (cIAP1/2 and XIAP). ASTX660 is currently being evaluated in a first-in-human phase 1–2 study in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02503423). In the ongoing phase 2, ASTX660 has demonstrated preliminary evidence of clinical activity in the relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) cohorts (Mehta et al, presented at the EHA Conference 2019, abs PS1073). Here, we report overall efficacy and safety data from the solid tumors (head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [HNSCC]; cervical carcinoma and other solid tumors) and lymphoma (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL], PTCL, CTCL,) phase 2 cohorts. Methods: Pts received treatment with ASTX660 orally at the RP2D 180mg/day on days 1 to 7, and 15 to 22 in a 28-day cycle. In the first stage 14 evaluable pts were enrolled in each of the 6 phase 2 cohorts with the option to expand the cohort if activity was observed. The primary endpoint was response rate as assessed by the investigator according to the Lugano criteria (DLBCL and PTCL), Global Assessment (CTCL), or RECIST 1.1 (solid tumors). Adverse events (AEs) were assessed per CTCAE V4.03. Results: As of June 4, 2019, a total of 107 pts have received ASTX660 in the solid tumors and lymphoma phase 2 cohorts (HNSCC n=14; DLBCL n=16; PTCL n=26; CTCL n=23; cervical carcinoma n=14; other solid tumors n= 14). Median age (range) was 61 (23-84) years and median number (range) of prior anticancer regimens was 3 (0-12). Among all pts, the most common related AEs of any grade (≥ 10%) were rash (35%), lipase elevation (34%), amylase elevation (29%), diarrhea (14%), fatigue (14%), AST elevation (13%), nausea (13%), and anemia (11%). Related AEs ≥ Grade 3 occurring in ≥ 5% of pts were rash (18%), lipase elevation (16%) and amylase elevation (9%). As of 4 June 2019, 86 pts (80%) discontinued study treatment: 64 (60%) due to progressive disease, 13 (12%) due to AE, 4 (4%) due to death, 4 (4%) due to withdrawal by participant and 1 (1%) for investigator’s decision. At the time of analysis, the ORR was 36% in the PTCL cohort and 15% in the CTCL cohort. One PR was reported in a pt with metastatic melanoma after 12 cycles of treatment. No objective responses were reported in the HNSCC, DLBCL or cervical cohorts. Accrual in the PTCL and CTCL continues; updated efficacy and safety data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: In the phase 2 part of the study ASTX660 monotherapy has demonstrated a manageable safety profile and encouraging activity in PTCL and CTCL warranting cohort expansion. Future plans include evaluation of ASXT660 both as mono- or combination therapy in selected malignancies.

Citation Format: Antoine Hollebecque, Sarit Assouline, Felipe Samaniego, Benoit You, Francine Foss, Anca Prica, Sarah W. Gordon, Marc Webster, Martin JS. Dyer, Dima El-Sharkawi, Geoffrey I. Shapiro, Lisa Nabell, Sarah P. Blagden, John Lister, Susanna V. Ulahannan, Yijun Sun, Danna Chan, Roberta Ferraldeschi, Monica Mita. Preliminary results of ASTX660, a novel non-peptidomimetic cIAP1/2 and XIAP antagonist, in 107 patients with solid tumors or lymphoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2019 Oct 26-30; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2019;18(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A072. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.TARG-19-A072

Risk factors for opioid abuse/dependence in hospitalized cancer patients in the United States

11589

Background: Opioid medications are the mainstay for treating cancer pain. Goal of this study was to identify risk factors for opioid abuse/dependence in patients hospitalized with cancer, explore whether risk of opioid abuse/dependence varies by cancer type and to assess whether opioid abuse/dependence in cancer patients effects the outcomes of hospitalization. Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample for the years of 2011-2015 was queried for the analysis. We used ICD-9-CM codes of solid tumors as a primary diagnosis for hospitalization, and opioid abuse/dependence as a secondary diagnosis of the hospitalization. We performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to examine the association between risk factors and opioid abuse/dependence. Data were analyzed using SAS v9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Results: Total of 524,624 patients were included in our cohort. Rate of opioid abuse/dependence was highest in patients with liver cancer (1.77%). Opioid abuse/dependence was less associated with age (>65 years old: OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.21-0.39). Patients with Medicaid insurance associated with increased risk of opioid abuse/dependence comparing to other insurances (OR 5.29, 95% CI 4.78-5.86). Strongest association with opioid abuse/dependence were in patients with liver cancer (OR 6.07, 95% CI 5.11-7.20) followed by head and neck cancer (OR 3.20, 95% CI 2.67-3.84). Substance abuse (OR 9.9, 95% CI 9.04-10.84), mental disease (OR-2.87, 95% CI 2.64-3.13) and nutrition deficiency (OR-2.09, 95% CI 1.90-2.31) were highly associated with opioid abuse dependence. Inhospital mortality rate, total cost of hospitalization, and length of stay were significantly higher in patients with opioid abuse/dependence (Table). Conclusions: We identified risk factors for opioid abuse/dependence in hospitalized patients with cancer and demonstrated that risk of opioid abuse varies by cancer type, and opioid abuse/dependence affects the outcomes of hospitalization. Findings of our study can be used for development of the screening tools with higher sensitivity and specificity for predicting the risk of opioid abuse/dependence in cancer patients.[Table: see text]

Lipid nanoparticle siRNA cocktails for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma is an aggressive and incurable subtype of non‐Hodgkin B cell lymphoma. Patients typically present with advanced disease, and most patients succumb within a decade of diagnosis. There is a clear and urgent need for novel therapeutic approaches that will affect mantle cell lymphoma through a unique mechanism compared to current therapies. This study examined the use of RNA interference (RNAi) therapy to attack mantle cell lymphoma at the mRNA level, silencing genes associated with cancer cell proliferation. We identified a lipid nanoparticle formulated with the lipidoid 306O₁₃ that delivered siRNA to JeKo‐1 and MAVER‐1 mantle cell lymphoma cell lines. Three therapeutic gene targets were examined for their effect on lymphoma growth. These included Cyclin D1, which is a cell cycle regulator, as well as Bcl‐2 and Mcl‐1, which prevent apoptosis. Gene knockdown with siRNA doses as low at 10 nM increased lymphoma cell apoptosis without carrier‐mediated toxicity. Silencing of Cyclin D1 induced apoptosis despite a twofold “compensation” upregulation of Cyclin D2. Upon simultaneous silencing of all three genes, nearly 75% of JeKo‐1 cells were apoptosing 3 days post‐transfection. Furthermore, cells proliferated at only 15% of their pretreatment rate. These data suggest that lipid nanoparticles‐formulated, multiplexed siRNA “cocktails” may serve as a beneficial addition to the treatment regimens for mantle cell lymphoma and other aggressive cancers.

Frontline treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in elderly: a systematic review of clinical trials in post-rituximab era

Treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains challenging in elderly population and systematic reviews are lacking in this area. Medline and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials in addition to conference proceedings were searched for therapeutic clinical trials on frontline treatment of DLBCL in adults ≥60 in post-rituximab era. Forty-one out of 713 reviewed papers met our inclusion criteria. Six cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP) administered every 21 d remain the standard treatment for fit elderly, with no role for maintenance rituximab. For individuals ≥80, the strongest evidence favors rituximab/ofatumumab-miniCHOP. Numerous alternative approaches including the use of liposomal anthracyclines, dose and regimen adjustment to frailty/comorbidity score, brief duration regimens, and consolidative radioimmunotherapy have produced promising outcomes and could be considered for R-CHOP inappropriate elderly. Phase III randomized trials studying the efficacy of liposomal vincristine, extended-exposure rituximab, and lenalidomide plus R-CHOP are ongoing.

Adjuvant sunitinib following chemoradiotherapy and surgery for locally advanced esophageal cancer: a phase II trial

The prognosis for locally advanced esophageal cancer is poor despite the use of trimodality therapy. In this phase II study, we report the feasibility, tolerability and efficacy of adjuvant sunitinib. Included were patients with stage IIa, IIB or III cancer of the thoracic esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Neoadjuvant therapy involved Irinotecan (65 mg/m² ) + Cisplatin (30 mg/m² ) on weeks 1 and 2, 4 and 5, 7 and 8 with concurrent radiation (50Gy/25 fractions) on weeks 4-8. Sunitinib was commenced 4-13 weeks after surgery and continued for one year. Sixty-one patients were included in the final analysis, 36 patients commenced adjuvant sunitinib. Fourteen patients discontinued sunitinib due to disease recurrence (39%) within the 12-month period, 12 (33%) discontinued due to toxicity, and 3 (8%) requested cessation of therapy. In the overall population, median survival was 26 months with a 2 and 3-year survival rate of 52% and 35%, respectively. The median survival for the 36 patients treated with sunitinib was 35 months and 2-year survival probability of 68%. In a historical control, a prior phase II study with the same trimodality therapy (n = 43), median survival was 36 months, with a 2-year survival of 67%. Initiation of adjuvant sunitinib is feasible, but poorly tolerated, with no signal of additional benefit over trimodality therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Lipidoid nanoparticle mediated silencing of Mcl-1 induces apoptosis in mantle cell lymphoma

Conventional chemo-immunotherapy fails to cure the majority of mantle cell lymphoma patients and causes substantial toxicity. Resistant mantle cell lymphoma cells commonly overexpress and are dependent on the anti-apoptotic protein, Mcl-1, for survival. In this study, we use potent lipidoid nanoparticles to deliver siRNA to silence Mcl-1 expression. Studies were conducted using two different mantle cell lymphoma cell lines, a normal (JeKo-1) and an aggressive (MAVER-1) line, to assess the ability of lipidoid nanoparticles to be used broadly in the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma. Mcl-1 mRNA silencing and protein knockdown was observed as early as one day after treatment and the lipidoid nanoparticles achieved sustained silencing of Mcl-1 mRNA for at least four days in both JeKo-1 and MAVER-1 cells. Eighty percent silencing was achieved at three days post-transfection in JeKo-1 cells while 50% silencing was achieved in MAVER-1 cells, which are more resistant to transfection. Interestingly, silencing of Mcl-1 induced apoptosis in nearly 30% of both JeKo-1 and MAVER-1 cells three days post-transfection. Additionally, Mcl-1 silencing and the resultant apoptosis in mantle cell lymphoma cells were dose dependent. These data suggest that lipidoid nanoparticles siRNA therapy targeting Mcl-1 has potential as a new treatment modality for mantle cell lymphoma and many other cancers that overexpress Mcl-1. The combination of anti-Mcl-1 lipidoid nanoparticles with other forms of targeted therapy offers hope for reducing or replacing cytotoxic chemotherapy as standard treatment for mantle cell lymphoma.

The incidence, mortality and timing of Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia after hematopoietic cell transplantation: a CIBMTR analysis

Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PJP) is associated with high morbidity and mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Little is known about PJP infections after HSCT because of the rarity of disease given routine prophylaxis. We report the results of a Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research study evaluating the incidence, timing, prophylaxis agents, risk factors and mortality of PJP after autologous (auto) and allogeneic (allo) HSCT. Between 1995 and 2005, 0.63% allo recipients and 0.28% auto recipients of first HSCT developed PJP. Cases occurred as early as 30 days to beyond a year after allo HSCT. A nested case cohort analysis with supplemental data (n=68 allo cases, n=111 allo controls) revealed that risk factors for PJP infection included lymphopenia and mismatch after HSCT. After allo or auto HSCT, overall survival was significantly poorer among cases vs controls (P=0.0004). After controlling for significant variables, the proportional hazards model revealed that PJP cases were 6.87 times more likely to die vs matched controls (P<0.0001). We conclude PJP infection is rare after HSCT but is associated with high mortality. Factors associated with GVHD and with poor immune reconstitution are among the risk factors for PJP and suggest that protracted prophylaxis for PJP in high-risk HSCT recipients may improve outcomes.