1
|
De Boeck J, Verfaillie C. Doxycycline inducible overexpression systems: how to induce your gene of interest without inducing misinterpretations. Mol Biol Cell 2021; 32:1517-1522. [PMID: 34383558 PMCID: PMC8351744 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e21-04-0177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The doxycycline inducible overexpression system is a highly flexible and widely used tool for both in vitro and in vivo studies. However, during the past decade, a handful of reports have explicitly called for caution when using this system. The raised concerns are based on the notion that doxycycline can impair mitochondrial function of mammalian cells and can alter properties such as cell proliferation. As such, experimental outcomes can be confounded with the side effects of doxycycline and valid interpretation can be seriously threatened. Today, no consensus seems to exist about how these problems should be prevented. Moreover, some of the strategies that have been used to cope with these difficulties can actually introduce additional problems that are related to genomic instability and genetic modification of the cells. Here, we elaborate on the above statements and clarify them by some basic examples taken from our personal wet-lab experience. As such, we provide a nuanced overview of the doxycycline inducible overexpression system, some of its limitations and how to deal with them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jolan De Boeck
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Stem Cell Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Catherine Verfaillie
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Stem Cell Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kumar M, Toprakhisar B, Van Haele M, Antoranz A, Boon R, Chesnais F, De Smedt J, Tricot T, Idoype TI, Canella M, Tilliole P, De Boeck J, Bajaj M, Ranga A, Bosisio FM, Roskams T, van Grunsven LA, Verfaillie CM. A fully defined matrix to support a pluripotent stem cell derived multi-cell-liver steatohepatitis and fibrosis model. Biomaterials 2021; 276:121006. [PMID: 34304139 DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Chronic liver injury, as observed in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), progressive fibrosis, and cirrhosis, remains poorly treatable. Steatohepatitis causes hepatocyte loss in part by a direct lipotoxic insult, which is amplified by derangements in the non-parenchymal cellular (NPC) interactive network wherein hepatocytes reside, including, hepatic stellate cells, liver sinusoidal endothelial cells and liver macrophages. To create an in vitro culture model encompassing all these cells, that allows studying liver steatosis, inflammation and fibrosis caused by NASH, we here developed a fully defined hydrogel microenvironment, termed hepatocyte maturation (HepMat) gel, that supports maturation and maintenance of pluripotent stem cell (PSC) derived hepatocyte- and NPC-like cells for at least one month. The HepMat-based co-culture system modeled key molecular and functional features of TGFβ-induced liver fibrosis and fatty-acid induced inflammation and fibrosis better than monocultures of its constituent cell populations. The novel co-culture system should open new avenues for studying mechanisms underlying liver steatosis, inflammation and fibrosis as well as for assessing drugs counteracting these effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manoj Kumar
- Stem Cell Institute, Department of Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Burak Toprakhisar
- Stem Cell Institute, Department of Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Matthias Van Haele
- Translational Cell & Tissue Research, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Asier Antoranz
- Translational Cell & Tissue Research, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ruben Boon
- Stem Cell Institute, Department of Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Francois Chesnais
- Stem Cell Institute, Department of Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jonathan De Smedt
- Stem Cell Institute, Department of Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tine Tricot
- Stem Cell Institute, Department of Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Teresa Izuel Idoype
- Stem Cell Institute, Department of Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marco Canella
- Stem Cell Institute, Department of Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pierre Tilliole
- Stem Cell Institute, Department of Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jolan De Boeck
- Stem Cell Institute, Department of Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Manmohan Bajaj
- Stem Cell Institute, Department of Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Adrian Ranga
- Biomechanics, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Francesca Maria Bosisio
- Translational Cell & Tissue Research, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tania Roskams
- Translational Cell & Tissue Research, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Leo A van Grunsven
- Liver Cell Biology Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Catherine M Verfaillie
- Stem Cell Institute, Department of Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tricot T, De Boeck J, Verfaillie C. Alternative Cell Sources for Liver Parenchyma Repopulation: Where Do We Stand? Cells 2020; 9:E566. [PMID: 32121068 PMCID: PMC7140465 DOI: 10.3390/cells9030566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Revised: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 02/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute and chronic liver failure is a highly prevalent medical condition with high morbidity and mortality. Currently, the therapy is orthotopic liver transplantation. However, in some instances, chiefly in the setting of metabolic diseases, transplantation of individual cells, specifically functional hepatocytes, can be an acceptable alternative. The gold standard for this therapy is the use of primary human hepatocytes, isolated from livers that are not suitable for whole organ transplantations. Unfortunately, primary human hepatocytes are scarcely available, which has led to the evaluation of alternative sources of functional hepatocytes. In this review, we will compare the ability of most of these candidate alternative cell sources to engraft and repopulate the liver of preclinical animal models with the repopulation ability found with primary human hepatocytes. We will discuss the current shortcomings of the different cell types, and some of the next steps that we believe need to be taken to create alternative hepatocyte progeny capable of regenerating the failing liver.
Collapse
|