Assessing the impact on pharmacists’ time by introducing a technician screening process for clinical trial prescriptions

Introduction

Various national guidance from the Lord Carter 2016 report to the NHS Long term plan have emphasised the need to transform traditional hospital pharmacy and make work streams more efficient.[1] A clinical trials pharmacist has historically validated clinical trial medicines. Whilst this is good practice for non-chemotherapy prescriptions, it is not a requirement of the Clinical Trial Regulations.[2] Interruption to validate trial prescriptions can have a negative impact on pharmacists’ duty and consequently patient outcomes. With limited data available, this issue has been highlighted by anecdotal evidence. Due to the often complex requirements associated with trials, the research team are responsible for assessing the suitability of treatment. This includes checking interactions with concomitant medication, reviewing blood results and patient counselling. The clinical aspect of the pharmacist validation is therefore removed, allowing technicians to be involved in the screening of suitable prescriptions. Much is written on technicians extending their roles in the clinical setting, but this service improvement focuses on enhancing their role within the pharmacy clinical trials department.

Aim

To evaluate the amount of pharmacists’ time saved by the introduction of technician screening of clinical trial prescriptions.

Method

A risk-based proforma was created and used by a pharmacist to assess clinical trial prescriptions for the suitability of screening by a Band 7 technician. Only prescriptions with pre-printed doses, no aseptic preparation or additional medicines, were approved for technician screening. The process of screening therefore only involves the checking of patient and prescriber details, allergy status and possibly a medication randomisation. The technicians under-went an in-house training including the screening of prescriptions under pharmacist supervision. A quantitative data collection tool was used to review the screening / validation of all nonchemotherapy clinical trial prescriptions received at two sites over a two-week period in September 2020. The data collection tool was piloted and all data was analysed using Microsoft Excel.

Results

A total of 89 prescriptions were received. 56 (63%) were eligible for technician screening, of which a suitable technician validated 50%.

Across both sites a total time of 360 minutes were spent validating/screening prescriptions including solving prescription related issues. Combining the time taken by a pharmacist to return from a clinical area and screening time consequently saved a total of 227 minutes of pharmacists’ time.

Conclusion

Distributing the workload amongst trained staff saves pharmacist’s time, which can be utilised on clinical and complex tasks. This does not eliminate the requirement of a pharmacist to validate prescriptions however; it reduces the frequency and streamlines the service. Further data collection is required to analyse the direct impact on patients’ and any changes in the number of reported errors. A limitation to the study is the lack of data prior to implementation as a comparator. Additionally, during data collection there were no suitable technicians available at one site due to the Covid-19 pandemic, resulting in only 50% of eligible prescriptions being screened by a technician. Ultimately, this does not change the outcome; enhancing technician’s roles allows pharmacists’ time to be used more efficiently.

References

1. Royal Pharmaceutical Society. Shaping Pharmacy for the future. Hospital Pharmacy: A briefing for members in England. 2017. Available at: https://www.rpharms.com/Portals/0/Hospital%20pharmacy%20briefing%20-%20final.pdf [Accessed: 11/10/20]

2. National Pharmacy Clinical Trials Advisory Group. Professional Guidance on Pharmacy Services for Clinical Trials v2.1. 2019. Available at: https://www.rpharms.com/Portals/0/RPS%20document%20library/Open%20access/Hospital%20Pharmacy%20Hub/Practice_Guidance_on_Pharmacy_Services_for_Clinical_Trials_v2.1.pdf?ver=2020-09-18-095937-733 [Accessed: 09/10/20]

SC-52151, a novel inhibitor of the human immunodeficiency virus protease

SC-52151 is a potent, selective, tight-binding human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitor containing the novel (R)-(hydroxyethyl) urea isostere. The mean 50% effective concentration for lymphotropic, monocytotropic strains and field isolates of HIV type 1 (HIV-1), HIV-2, and simian immunodeficiency virus is 26 ng/ml (43 nM). The combination of SC-52151 and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors synergistically inhibited HIV-1 replication without additive toxicity. An extended postantiviral effect correlates with inhibition of gag and gag-pol polyprotein processing. SC-52151 is highly protein bound ( >90%) in human plasma, and the level of partitioning into erythrocytes is low. Physiological concentrations of alpha-1-acid glycoprotein, but not albumin, substantially affect the antiviral potency of SC-52151. The oral bioavailability of [14C]SC-52151 is 17% when it is administered as an elixir to the rat, dog, or monkey. Oxidation of the t-butyl moiety is the major route of biotransformation, and elimination is mainly by biliary excretion. No toxicologically significant effects have been observed in animals. Pharmacokinetic and metabolism studies in multiple animal species predict 20 to 30% systemic bioavailability, an elimination half-life of 1 to 2 h, and a volume of distribution of greater than 3 liters/kg in humans.

HIV-1 protease inhibitors: ketomethylene isosteres with unusually high affinity compared with hydroxyethylene isostere analogs

HIV protease is a member of the aspartic proteinase family of proteolytic enzymes which include pepsin and renin. In contrast to the enhanced affinity seen with renin and pepsin upon conversion of the transition-state isostere, ketomethylene, to the hydroxyethylene, a set of HIV protease inhibitors showed a reduction in affinity. This implies that interactions with the active site of other segments of the inhibitor than those of the transition-state analog must predominate in the case of HIV protease, and that observations made on mammalian aspartic proteinases do not necessarily apply to viral aspartic proteinases.

New hydroxyethylamine HIV protease inhibitors that suppress viral replication

The synthesis of analogues of AcSerLeuAsn[Phe-HEA-Pro]IleValOMe (1, JG-365; where HEA stands for the hydroxyethylamine unit 2), a tight-binding inhibitor of HIVP, are reported. Systematic modification of the P3 and P3' regions of the inhibitors has led to smaller HIVP inhibitors that inhibit viral replication in HIV-infected and SIV-infected cell cultures. Six aliphatic and/or aromatic derivatives were prepared by replacing residues in the P3 regions of BocLeuAsn[Phe-HEA-Pro]IleValOMe. Aromatic side chains at P3 gave better inhibitors than aliphatic side chains. The better inhibitors in this series contained a beta-naphthylalanine or a biphenyl unit at P3. A second series of HIVP inhibitors were obtained by converting the P3 group into acyl groups. CbzAsn[Phe-HEA-Pro]IlePheOMe and Qua-Asn-[Phe-HEA-Pro]-Ile-Phe-OMe (where Qua = quinolin-2-ylcarbonyl) are potent HIVP inhibitors with Ki values equal to 1.0 and 0.1 nM, respectively. The inhibition constants were determined by using the continuous fluorometric assay developed by Toth and Marshall. The activities of the protease inhibitors for inhibition of SIV replication were determined in vitro using CEM x 174 cells. Inhibition of HIV infection was determined essentially as reported by Pauwels and co-workers. The anti-HIV assay was carried out in culture using CEM cells (a CD4+ lymphocyte line) infected with virus strain HTLV-IIIb with a multiplicity of infection of 0.1. Several analogues inhibited the cytopathic effect at concentrations of 0.1-0.8 microgram/mL. These results establish that good inhibitors of HIV protease that inhibit viral replication in infected lymphocytes in in vitro cell assays can be obtained from JG-365 when the AcSerLeu unit is replaced by aromatic acyl derivatives.