Obesity, sleeve gastrectomy and gastro-esophageal reflux disease

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most frequently performed operation for morbid obesity in the world. In spite of its demonstrated efficacy, the Achilles' Heel of this procedure seems to be either pre-existing or de novo gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) with its potential complications such as peptic esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus and, in the long-term, esophageal adenocarcinoma. According to factual literature, it appears clear that Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the preferred choice in case of pre-existing GERD or hiatal hernia discovered during preoperative workup for bariatric surgery. Nonetheless, certain authors propose performance of SG with an associated antireflux procedure such as Nissen fundoplication. Strict endoscopic surveillance is recommended after bariatric surgery. Revisional surgery (conversion of SG into Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)) is the treatment of choice for patients who develop GERD after SG when conservative treatment (modified lifestyle and proton pump inhibitors) has failed. Lastly, with regard to the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma after SG, large scale studies with adequate follow-up are necessary to come to factual conclusions. In all cases, the management of this conundrum remains a major technical challenge that has to be taken in consideration in future years, especially because of the current expansion of bariatric surgery.

Umbrella reviews: A new tool to synthesize scientific evidence in surgery

Researchers and practitioners are faced with an exponential increase in the number of systematic reviews (SRs) (with or without meta-analysis), a so-called `secondary' research method that synthesizes data from primary research. This growing number, sometimes with discordant results on the same subject or with non-conclusions, has led to the introduction of the concept of reviews to synthesize SR in order to combine scientific knowledge useful to practitioners. These so-called ``umbrella reviews'' (UR) constitute a new tertiary research tool. Surgical research is no exception to this development but umbrella surgical reviews remain relatively rare. Any UR must be transparent and meet rigorous methodological criteria. The UR could thus provide answers to practical questions in the field of surgery, but only on condition that the bias of the included SRs is limited. Let us not forget that the base requirement of clinical surgical research remains the good methodological quality of clinical studies (primary research). Only thus can SRs or URs (secondary or tertiary research) be more useful and decisive.

Comment on: Safety and efficacy of low pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic colorectal surgery

Feasibility of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum is feasible in expert hand. Its efficacy within enhanced recovery programmes and its safety need to be demonstrated in future studies

Conceptual innovation: 4P Medicine and 4P surgery

The aim of this article is to present the concept of "4P medicine" i.e., medicine that is Personalized, Preventive, Predictive, and Participatory. We will discuss the evolution from cure-focused traditional medicine toward personalized medicine based on genome analysis. This new approach is illustrated by several clinical examples such as prevention of cardiovascular diseases (primary and secondary), prophylactic cancer surgery, targeted therapies, targeted peri-operative care and patient participation in their care. Finally, it will discuss the impact of this development on the health system of the future and the ethical questions raised by this new approach.

Evidence-based evaluation of abdominal drainage in pancreatic surgery

Pancreatic fistula is the most common and dreaded complication after pancreatic resection, responsible for high morbidity and mortality (2 to 30%). Prophylactic drainage of the operative site is usually put in place to decrease and/or detect postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) early. However, this policy is currently debated and the data from the literature are unclear. The goal of this update is to analyze the most recent evidence-based data with regard to prophylactic abdominal drainage after pancreatic resection (pancreatoduodenectomy [PD] or distal pancreatectomy [PD]). This systematic review of the literature between 1990 and 2020 sought to answer the following questions: should drainage of the operative site after pancreatectomy be routine or adapted to the risk of POPF? If a drainage is used, how long should it remain in the abdomen, what criteria should be used to decide to remove it, and what type of drainage should be preferred? Has the introduction of laparoscopy changed our practice? The literature seems to indicate that it is not possible to recommend the omission of routine drainage after pancreatic resection. By contrast, an approach based on the risk of POPF using the fistula risk score seems beneficial. When a drain is placed, early removal (within 5 days) seems feasible based on clinical, laboratory (C-reactive protein, leukocyte count, neutrophile/lymphocyte ratio, dosage and dynamic of amylase in the drains on D1, D3±D5) and radiological findings. This is in line with the development of enhanced recovery programs after pancreatic surgery. Finally, this literature review did not find any specific data relative to mini-invasive pancreatic surgery.

Equipment failures in laparoscopic surgery: Causes and consequences

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess incidence, causes and consequences of equipment failures in a high volume, advanced endoscopic surgery department.

METHODS

This is a prospectical observational single centre study between April and July of 2019 in the Gynecological surgery department of the Estaing University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, France. During the study period, 171 laparoscopies were observed. Data were collected real time by three supernumerary observers.

RESULTS

In total, 66 (38.6%) laparoscopies were complicated by equipment failures. The bipolar cable and forceps accounted for 31% of the total amount of malfunctions in laparoscopy. Causes of malfunctions were in 45% due to the instrument per se and in 43% due to the incorrect combination of elements. Less commonly, the equipment was not available or a mismatched was reported. The total length of the surgery increased by 1.35% due to the malfunctions. Human error was identified in 50% of cases. No morbility, neither mortality was reported in this series; however we observed 34 malfunctions that could have led to serious consequences for the patients and 3 incidents induced a real consequence on the operation workflow.

CONCLUSIONS

Equipment failure is a common event in endoscopy. On the opposite, time wasted for the malfunctions is low in laparoscopy, as it only accounts for 1.35% of the overall surgical time. Human decisions contributed to malfunctions in almost half of cases. This alarming finding may advise for intensification in training on instruments of the whole surgical team.

Is an enhanced recovery program (ERP) after rectal surgery as feasible as after colonic surgery? A multicentre Francophone study of 870 rectal resections

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery program (ERP) is well-established in colorectal surgery. Rectal surgery (RS) is known to be associated with high morbidity and prolonged hospital stay, which might explain why ERPs are less applied in this specific group of patients. The aim of this large-scale study was to assess the feasibility of an ERP in RS compared with colonic surgery.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of a prospective database including 3740 patients eligible for colorectal resection from February 2014 to January 2017 in 75 European Francophone centres. Patients were divided into two groups (colon group C vs. rectum group R). The main endpoint was compliance with ERP components. A subgroup analysis was performed in patients for whom a defunctioning stoma (DS) was required after RS.

RESULTS

A total of 3740 patients were included. There were 2870 patients in group C and 870 patients in group R. The overall compliance rate for ERPs was 81.71% in group C and 79.09% in group R. Patients were significantly less mobilized within 24 h in group R. Specific recommendations for RS concerning bowel preparation and abdominal drainage were significantly less implemented. Overall morbidity was significantly higher in group R. Mean length of stay (LOS) was significantly shorter in group C. In the sub-group analysis, a DS was significantly associated with fewer compliance with early mobilization and early feeding, leading to significantly longer LOS (group R).

CONCLUSION

ERP is safe and effective in RS, despite the well-known higher morbidity and LOS compared with colonic surgery. DS could be a limiting factor in ERP implementation after RS.

Eco-responsibility in the operating theater: An urgent need for organizational transformation

Factors associating environmental degradation with human health have shown that air pollution is a source of morbi-mortality throughout the world. Unfortunately, hospitals are themselves "silent polluters". As healthcare professionals, we are the guarantors not only of quality of patient care, but also of proper hospital conduct. The aim of this attempt at clarification is to outline what can be done in the operating theater to reduce the environmental impact of the treatments we administer. Our recommendations will go above and beyond regulatory frameworks and draw upon daily practice concerning waste management, energy consumption, utilization of anesthetic agents and multiple forms of waste. A number of French and international pilot experimentations have been carried out and could strongly contribute to the modification of clinical practices with a societal impact, at a time when ecology has become one of the main preoccupations of our fellow citizens.

Strategy for the practice of digestive and oncological surgery during the Covid-19 epidemic

The Covid-19 pandemic is changing the organization of healthcare and has a direct impact on digestive surgery. Healthcare priorities and circuits are being modified. Emergency surgery is still a priority. Functional surgery is to be deferred. Laparoscopic surgery must follow strict rules so as not to expose healthcare professionals (HCPs) to added risk. The question looms large in cancer surgery-go ahead or defer? There is probably an added risk due to the pandemic that must be balanced against the risk incurred by deferring surgery. For each type of cancer-colon, pancreas, oesogastric, hepatocellular carcinoma-morbidity and mortality rates are stated and compared with the oncological risk incurred by deferring surgery and/or the tumour doubling time. Strategies can be proposed based on this comparison. For colonic cancers T1-2, N0, it is advisable to defer surgery. For advanced colonic lesions, it seems judicious to undertake neoadjuvant chemotherapy and then wait. For rectal cancers T3-4 and/or N+, chemoradiotherapy is indicated, short radiotherapy must be discussed (followed by a waiting period) to reduce time of exposure in the hospital and to prevent infections. Most complex surgery with high morbidity and mortality-oesogastric, hepatic or pancreatic-is most often best deferred.

Risks of viral contamination in healthcare professionals during laparoscopy in the Covid-19 pandemic

The Covid-19 pandemic has markedly changed our practices. This article analyses the risks of contamination among healthcare professionals (HCPs) during laparoscopic surgery on patients with Covid-19. Harmful effects of aerosols from a pneumoperitoneum, with the virus present, have not yet been quantified. Measures for the protection of HCPs are an extrapolation of those taken during other epidemics. They must still be mandatory to minimise the risk of viral contamination. Protection measures include personal protection equipment for HCPs, adaptation of surgical technique (method for obtaining pneumoperitoneum, filters, preferred intracorporeal anastomosis, precautions during the exsufflation of the pneumoperitoneum), and organisation of the operating room.

[Strategy for the practice of digestive and oncologic surgery in COVID-19 epidemic situation]

La pandémie due au COVID-19 modifie l’organisation des soins et change la réalisation de la chirurgie digestive. Les priorités sanitaires et les circuits de soins sont modifiés. La chirurgie d’urgence reste prioritaire. Les interventions pour chirurgie fonctionnelles sont à reporter. La chirurgie par laparoscopie doit suivre des règles strictes pour ne pas exposer les professionnels à un surrisque. Le questionnement principal concerne la chirurgie oncologique, opérer ou reporter ? Il existe probablement un sur risque opératoire induit par la pandémie qui doit être mis en balance avec le retard de prise en charge chirurgical. Pour chaque type de cancer, colon, pancréas, œsogastrique, hépatocarcinome, la morbi-mortalité est rappelée et mise en parallèle avec le risque oncologique lié au retard à la chirurgie et/ou au temps de doublement de la tumeur. Cette comparaison permet de proposer des stratégies, ainsi pour les cancers coliques (T1-2, N0), il est souhaitable de retarder la chirurgie. Pour les lésions coliques avancées, il semble prudent de recommander une chimiothérapie néo adjuvante et d’attendre. Pour les cancers du rectum T3-4 et/ou N+, une radio-chimiothérapie est indiquée, une radiothérapie courte devra être discutée (suivie d’une période d’attente) afin de réduire le temps d’exposition à l’hôpital et d’éviter les infections. La majorité des chirurgies complexes à forte morbi-mortalité, œsogastrique, hépatique ou pancréatique doivent sans doute le plus souvent être reportée.

Correction to: Incidence and Risk Factors for Severity of Postoperative Ileus After Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective Registry Data Analysis

In the list of participating investigators that appears in Acknowledgements, one of the investigators names appears incorrectly.

Intolerance to early oral feeding in enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery: an early red flag?

AIM

Enhanced recovery programmes (ERPs) involve early postoperative oral feeding. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that intolerance to early feeding was associated with a complicated postoperative course.

METHOD

A retrospective cohort analysis of the prospective multicentre database developed by the Francophone Group for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (GRACE) was undertaken. Seventy-one centres in Belgium, France and Switzerland participated in the study. All patients were encouraged to eat within 24 h after surgery. Patients were separated into two groups according to whether early feeding was well tolerated (WT) or poorly tolerated (PT). The primary outcome measure was overall postoperative complications. Secondary outcome measures were unplanned reoperation, early mobilization rate and duration of postoperative hospital stay.

RESULTS

Among the cohort of 3034 patients, early feeding was WT in 2614 patients (WT group) and PT in 420 patients (PT group). There were significantly more postoperative complications in the PT group than in the WT group (52.1% vs 17.0%, respectively; P = 0.001), namely more unplanned reoperations, less early mobilization and longer postoperative hospital stay. Multivariate analyses confirmed that PT early feeding was the main and dominant independent factor for postoperative complications [OR 4.47 (95% CI3.49-5.72); P < 0.001], more unplanned reoperations and longer hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates a close relationship between intolerance to early feeding and a complicated postoperative course. Whenever this simple very early red flag is observed, discharge should not be planned until postoperative complications have been ruled out.

Skin preparation for abdominal surgery

INTRODUCTION

Surgical site infections (SSI) are a public health issue. The purpose of this review is to review the literature on methods of pre-operative skin preparation for the prevention of SSI in abdominal surgery.

METHODS

In order to obtain the best level of evidence, only meta-analyses and randomized controlled clinical trials were selected from the Cochrane Library and PubMed databases. High-powered non-randomized studies were included when results were not available for the questions asked. The primary endpoint was the rate of SSI within 30 days.

RESULTS

Analysis of the 20 selected studies suggested that hair removal in the operative field is not recommended except when it interferes with surgery; in this case, hair clipping or chemical depilation is recommended and shaving should be banned. For the pre-operative shower, the choice of a detergent product with or without antiseptic does not seem to matter, and there were no published data on the required number of showers or the interval before surgery. Application of an alcohol-based solution to the operative field for cutaneous disinfection is recommended; the products used seem to be equivalent, and there is no need for pre-operative detergent scrubbing. There is no strong evidence to recommend adhesive plastic drapes for clean or contaminated surgery.

CONCLUSION

Some recommendations on skin preparation before abdominal surgery to reduce the rate of SSI are based on a high level of evidence. Other recommendations such as the number and duration of pre-operative showers or use of adhesive plastic skin drapes are less well supported.

Are enhanced recovery programs in colorectal surgery feasible and useful in the elderly? A systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Enhanced recovery programs (ERP) are no longer questionable in the management of patients undergoing surgery. However, there is some doubt as to their feasibility and efficacy in the elderly. Our goal was to systematically review the evidence-based literature concerning the feasibility of ERP in elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The PubMed and Cochrane Database for systematic reviews as well as the "grey" literature between 2000 and 2015 were sought. Articles were selected if they compared ERP in elderly patients to ERP in young patients (feasibility) or compared ERP to traditional post-operative management in the elderly (efficacy).

RESULTS

Sixteen articles were identified according to the inclusion criteria. All showed that an ERP was feasible in the elderly although post-operative morbidity was higher compared to younger patients. Compared to traditional management, ERP was effective since it decreased (as in the young) the overall rate of complications and thus the duration of hospital stay. There were not enough data on the degree of implementation of ERP and the medico-economic aspects to come to any formal conclusions.

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive systematic review of the literature showed that ERP was feasible and effective in the elderly undergoing colorectal surgery. Protocols should be adapted to the particular aspects of this population. Future research should target pre-operative evaluation and the place of pre-habilitation in geriatric ERP.

Feasibility prospective study of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with suprapubic approach

BACKGROUND

Since the publication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) using three ports instead of four, no significant evolution has impacted on our clinical practice in order to improve length of stay, postoperative pain, time of recovery and cosmetic results. Recently, a renewed interest has been observed with the suprapubic approach, called occult scar laparoscopic cholecystectomy (OSLC). The aim of this prospective multicentric study was to evaluate the feasibility of OSLC in 2 French centers.

METHODS

From March to September 2014, 60 patients were prospectively included in this study. The operation incisions consisted of an umbilical incision for camera; an incision in the right groin for maneuvers of exposition and a suprapubic incision for instrumental dissection and clipping. Outcome was by operative time, operative complications, hospital length of stay, analgesia required after surgery, and cosmetic outcomes. The Patient Satisfaction Scale and Visual Analog Score (VAS) also were used to evaluate the level of cosmetic result and postoperative pain.

RESULTS

No laparoscopy was converted to an open procedure, the mean operative time was 53±20min. No patient had intraoperative bile duct injury or significant bleeding. The mean length of stay was 1.70±0.76 days. Two patients (3%) experienced postoperative complication (1 intra-abdominal abscess treated by antibiotics and 1 subcutaneous seroma of the 11-mm port wound treated successfully by needle aspiration).

CONCLUSION

The technique proved to be safe and feasible with no specific complication and without specific instrument. It offers satisfactory postoperative pain level and good cosmetic results.

Enhanced recovery after gastro-intestinal surgery: The scientific background

Enhanced recovery programs (ERP) are without any doubt a major innovation in the care of surgical patients. This multimodal approach encompasses elements of both medical and surgical care. The goal of this in-depth review is to analyze the surgical aspects of ERP, underlining the scientific rationale behind each element of ERP after surgery and in particular, the role of mechanical bowel preparation before colorectal surgery, the place of minimal access surgery, the utility of nasogastric tube, abdominal drainage, bladder catheters and early re-feeding. Publication of factual data has allowed many dogmas to be discarded.

The benefits of enhanced recovery after surgery

Enhanced recovery programs (ERP) after surgery are now being increasingly applied in daily practice. The purpose of this article is to review specific aspects and advantages of this approach. Beyond the reduction in overall morbidity (found for multiple surgical specialties), ERP include issues and stakes that affect patient care, the care team and society in general. Data from the literature are in agreement, emphasizing that, in this clinical pathway, the patient has thus become an actor in his own care, whose active participation is paramount to the success of the program. In parallel with this, a spirit of teamwork is required and the program contributes substantially to cohesion within the team. Finally, all studies show that ERP have a beneficial effect in economic terms for society.

Large-scale implementation of enhanced recovery programs after surgery. A francophone experience

INTRODUCTION

Enhanced recovery after surgery program (ERP) has now surpassed the stage of clinical research in certain specialties and currently poses the problematic of large-scale implementation. The goal of this study was to report the experience during the first year of implementation in three French-speaking countries.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a prospective study in which 67 healthcare centers, all registered in the Grace-Audit databank, participated. Included were patients undergoing colorectal (CRS), bariatric (BS) and orthopedic hip and knee surgery (OS), performed within an ERP. The main endpoints were duration of hospital stay, postoperative morbidity, the degree of compliance with the elements of the ERP, the relation between the extent of application of the elements and postoperative hospital stay, and finally the completeness of data inclusions in the databank.

RESULTS

A total of 1904 patients were included in the Grace-Audit databank between January 1, 2015 and January 31, 2016, undergoing CRS (n=490), BS (n=431), and OS (n=983). The mean implementation rate was 83.7±10.0% for CRS, 75.0±23.7% for BS, and 83.5±14.9% for OS. The duration of hospital stay was 6.5 days for CRS, 2.6 days for BS and 3.4 days for OS. Overall postoperative morbidity (onset of postoperative undesirable event), surgical morbidity (superficial or deep organ space surgical site complications such as bleeding, infection or defective healing) and readmission rates were 20.6%, 7.5%, and 5.7% for CRS; 2.5%, 1.4%, and 1.6% for BS and 2.9%, 0.2%, and 2% for OS, respectively. A statistically significant relationship was found between the degree of compliance of the elements of ERP and the duration of hospital stay for CRS and BS; hospital stay was reduced when at least 15 of the 22 elements of the program were applied (P<0.001). The patients included in the Grace-Audit databank represented less than 20% of the patients undergoing operation in the same establishments during the study period for all three specialties.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that large-scale ERPs are feasible and safe in French-speaking countries. Nonetheless, although encouraging, these preliminary results highlight that implementation must be improved in specialties such as bariatric surgery and that more complete data collection is needed.