1
|
Purshouse K, Pollard SM, Bickmore WA. Imaging extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) in cancer. Histochem Cell Biol 2024:10.1007/s00418-024-02280-2. [PMID: 38625562 DOI: 10.1007/s00418-024-02280-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
Extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) are circular regions of DNA that are found in many cancers. They are an important means of oncogene amplification, and correlate with treatment resistance and poor prognosis. Consequently, there is great interest in exploring and targeting ecDNA vulnerabilities as potential new therapeutic targets for cancer treatment. However, the biological significance of ecDNA and their associated regulatory control remains unclear. Light microscopy has been a central tool in the identification and characterisation of ecDNA. In this review we describe the different cellular models available to study ecDNA, and the imaging tools used to characterise ecDNA and their regulation. The insights gained from quantitative imaging are discussed in comparison with genome sequencing and computational approaches. We suggest that there is a crucial need for ongoing innovation using imaging if we are to achieve a full understanding of the dynamic regulation and organisation of ecDNA and their role in tumourigenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Purshouse
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Regeneration and Repair & Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Edinburgh Cancer Research UK Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Steven M Pollard
- Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Regeneration and Repair & Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Edinburgh Cancer Research UK Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Wendy A Bickmore
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Purshouse K, Bulbeck HJ, Rooney AG, Noble KE, Carruthers RD, Thompson G, Hamerlik P, Yap C, Kurian KM, Jefferies SJ, Lopez JS, Jenkinson MD, Hanemann CO, Stead LF. Adult brain tumour research in 2024: Status, challenges and recommendations. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2024; 50:e12979. [PMID: 38605644 DOI: 10.1111/nan.12979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
In 2015, a groundswell of brain tumour patient, carer and charity activism compelled the UK Minister for Life Sciences to form a brain tumour research task and finish group. This resulted, in 2018, with the UK government pledging £20m of funding, to be paralleled with £25m from Cancer Research UK, specifically for neuro-oncology research over the subsequent 5 years. Herein, we review if and how the adult brain tumour research landscape in the United Kingdom has changed over that time and what challenges and bottlenecks remain. We have identified seven universal brain tumour research priorities and three cross-cutting themes, which span the research spectrum from bench to bedside and back again. We discuss the status, challenges and recommendations for each one, specific to the United Kingdom.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Purshouse
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Alasdair G Rooney
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Gerard Thompson
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Petra Hamerlik
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Kathreena M Kurian
- Bristol Brain Tumour Research Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Juanita S Lopez
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and the Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | | | | | - Lucy F Stead
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Purshouse K, Thomson JP, Vallet M, Alexander L, Bonisteel I, Brennan M, Cameron DA, Figueroa JD, Furrie E, Haig P, Heck M, McCaughan H, Mitchell P, McVicars H, Primrose L, Silva I, Templeton K, Wilson N, Hall PS. The Scottish COVID Cancer Immunity Prevalence Study: A Longitudinal Study of SARS-CoV-2 Immune Response in Patients Receiving Anti-Cancer Treatment. Oncologist 2023; 28:e145-e155. [PMID: 36719033 PMCID: PMC10020811 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer and anti-cancer treatment (ACT) may be risk factors for severe SARS-CoV-2 infection and limited vaccine efficacy. Long-term longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate these risks. The Scottish COVID cancer immunity prevalence (SCCAMP) study characterizes the incidence and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination in patients with solid tumors undergoing ACT. This preliminary analysis includes 766 patients recruited since May 2020. METHODS Patients with solid-organ cancers attending secondary care for active ACT consented to the collection of routine electronic health record data and serial blood samples over 12 months. Blood samples were tested for total SARS-CoV-2 antibody. RESULTS A total of 766 participants were recruited between May 28, 2020 and October 31, 2021. Most received cytotoxic chemotherapy (79%). Among the participants, 48 (6.3%) were tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR. Infection rates were unaffected by ACT, largely aligning with the local population. Mortality proportion was not higher with a recent positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR (10.4% vs 10.6%). Multivariate analysis revealed lower infection rates in vaccinated patients regardless of chemotherapy (HR 0.307 [95% CI, 0.144-0.6548]) or immunotherapy (HR 0.314 [95% CI, 0.041-2.367]) treatment. A total of 96.3% of patients successfully raised SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after >2 vaccines. This was independent of the treatment type. CONCLUSION This is the largest on-going longitudinal real-world dataset of patients undergoing ACT during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. This preliminary analysis demonstrates that patients with solid tumors undergoing ACT have high protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection following COVID-19 vaccination. The SCCAMP study will evaluate long-term COVID-19 antibody trends, focusing on specific ACTs and patient subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Lorna Alexander
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Isaac Bonisteel
- The University of Edinburgh Medical School, The University of Edinburgh, Chancellor’s Building, Edinburgh BioQuarter, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Maree Brennan
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, UK
| | - David A Cameron
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, UK
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jonine D Figueroa
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
- Usher Institute, Centre for Population Health Sciences, Old Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Elizabeth Furrie
- Department of Immunology, Ninewells Hospital and Dundee Medical School, Dundee, UK
| | - Pamela Haig
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, UK
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Mattea Heck
- The University of Edinburgh Medical School, The University of Edinburgh, Chancellor’s Building, Edinburgh BioQuarter, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Hugh McCaughan
- Clinical Infection Research Group, Regional Infectious Diseases Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Paul Mitchell
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Heather McVicars
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Ines Silva
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, UK
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Kate Templeton
- Clinical Infection Research Group, Regional Infectious Diseases Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Natalie Wilson
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, UK
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Peter S Hall
- Corresponding author: Peter S. Hall, PhD, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Woodcock VK, Chen J, Purshouse K, Butcher C, Collins L, Haddon C, Verrall G, Elhussein L, Roberts C, Tarlton A, Rei M, Napolitani G, Salio M, Middleton MR, Cerundolo V, Crew J, Protheroe AS. PemBla: A Phase 1 study of intravesical pembrolizumab in recurrent non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer. BJUI Compass 2023; 4:322-330. [PMID: 37025470 PMCID: PMC10071078 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives This study aimed to investigate the anti-PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab as a potential agent for use in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) by conducting a Phase 1 safety run-in study to assess the safety and tolerability of intravesical pembrolizumab after transurethral resection of the bladder tumour (TURBT). Patients and methods Eligible patients had recurrent NMIBC for which adjuvant treatment post TURBT was a reasonable treatment option, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 0-1 and adequate end-organ function. Pembrolizumab was administered by intravesical instillation once weekly for a total of six doses. Intra-patient dose escalation was performed in three paired patient cohorts with doses starting at 50 mg and increasing through 100 mg to a maximum of 200 mg. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03 with dose limiting toxicity (DLT) defined as a clinically significant, drug-related, Grade 4 haematological or Grade 3 or higher non-haematological toxicity occurring within 7 days of administration of the first treatment at a given dose for that patient. Results Six patients were treated with no DLTs seen during dose escalation. Drug-related AEs were of low grade and included dysuria and fatigue. All patients completed six doses of treatment as planned. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assays did not detect any pembrolizumab in the serum following repeated intravesical administration, and no changes in peripheral immune cell populations were observed. Conclusions Administration of intravesical pembrolizumab was well tolerated and did not raise any safety concerns in patients with NMIBC following TURBT. There was no evidence of systemic absorption or systemic immune effects following intravesical administration. Further studies are required to assess whether intravesical administration has anti-tumour activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria K. Woodcock
- Department of Oncology Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford Oxford UK
- MRC Human Immunology Unit MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine Oxford UK
| | - Ji‐Li Chen
- MRC Human Immunology Unit MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine Oxford UK
| | - Karin Purshouse
- Department of Oncology Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford Oxford UK
| | - Chrissie Butcher
- Oncology Clinical Trials Office, Department of Oncology University of Oxford Oxford UK
| | - Linda Collins
- Oncology Clinical Trials Office, Department of Oncology University of Oxford Oxford UK
| | - Caroline Haddon
- Department of Oncology Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford Oxford UK
| | | | - Leena Elhussein
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine University of Oxford Oxford UK
| | - Corran Roberts
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine University of Oxford Oxford UK
| | - Andrea Tarlton
- MRC Human Immunology Unit MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine Oxford UK
| | - Margarida Rei
- MRC Human Immunology Unit MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine Oxford UK
| | - Giorgio Napolitani
- MRC Human Immunology Unit MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine Oxford UK
| | - Mariolina Salio
- MRC Human Immunology Unit MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine Oxford UK
| | - Mark R. Middleton
- Department of Oncology Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford Oxford UK
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre Oxford UK
| | - Vincenzo Cerundolo
- MRC Human Immunology Unit MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine Oxford UK
| | - Jeremy Crew
- Department of Urology Churchill Hospital Oxford UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Purshouse K, Friman ET, Boyle S, Dewari PS, Grant V, Hamdan A, Morrison GM, Brennan PM, Beentjes SV, Pollard SM, Bickmore WA. Oncogene expression from extrachromosomal DNA is driven by copy number amplification and does not require spatial clustering in glioblastoma stem cells. eLife 2022; 11:e80207. [PMID: 36476408 PMCID: PMC9728993 DOI: 10.7554/elife.80207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) are frequently observed in human cancers and are responsible for high levels of oncogene expression. In glioblastoma (GBM), ecDNA copy number correlates with poor prognosis. It is hypothesized that their copy number, size, and chromatin accessibility facilitate clustering of ecDNA and colocalization with transcriptional hubs, and that this underpins their elevated transcriptional activity. Here, we use super-resolution imaging and quantitative image analysis to evaluate GBM stem cells harbouring distinct ecDNA species (EGFR, CDK4, PDGFRA). We find no evidence that ecDNA routinely cluster with one another or closely interact with transcriptional hubs. Cells with EGFR-containing ecDNA have increased EGFR transcriptional output, but transcription per gene copy is similar in ecDNA compared to the endogenous chromosomal locus. These data suggest that it is the increased copy number of oncogene-harbouring ecDNA that primarily drives high levels of oncogene transcription, rather than specific interactions of ecDNA with each other or with high concentrations of the transcriptional machinery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Purshouse
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of EdinburghEdinburghUnited Kingdom
- Centre for Regenerative Medicine and Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, The University of EdinburghEdinburghUnited Kingdom
| | - Elias T Friman
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of EdinburghEdinburghUnited Kingdom
| | - Shelagh Boyle
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of EdinburghEdinburghUnited Kingdom
| | - Pooran Singh Dewari
- Centre for Regenerative Medicine and Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, The University of EdinburghEdinburghUnited Kingdom
| | - Vivien Grant
- Centre for Regenerative Medicine and Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, The University of EdinburghEdinburghUnited Kingdom
| | - Alhafidz Hamdan
- Centre for Regenerative Medicine and Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, The University of EdinburghEdinburghUnited Kingdom
| | - Gillian M Morrison
- Centre for Regenerative Medicine and Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, The University of EdinburghEdinburghUnited Kingdom
| | - Paul M Brennan
- Centre for Regenerative Medicine and Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, The University of EdinburghEdinburghUnited Kingdom
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of EdinburghEdinburghUnited Kingdom
| | - Sjoerd V Beentjes
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of EdinburghEdinburghUnited Kingdom
- School of Mathematics, University of EdinburghEdinburghUnited Kingdom
| | - Steven M Pollard
- Centre for Regenerative Medicine and Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, The University of EdinburghEdinburghUnited Kingdom
| | - Wendy A Bickmore
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of EdinburghEdinburghUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Purshouse K, Thomson JP, Vallet M, Alexander L, Bonisteel I, Brennan M, Cameron DA, Figueroa J, Furrie E, Haig P, Heck M, McCaughan H, Mitchell P, McVicars H, Primrose L, Templeton K, Wilson N, Hall PS. Scottish COVID CAncer iMmunity Prevalence (SCCAMP): A longitudinal study of patients with cancer receiving active anti-cancer treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.e18733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e18733 Background: Cancer and systemic anti-cancer treatment (SACT) have been identified as possible risk factors for infection and related severe illness associated with SARS-CoV-2 virus as a consequence of immune suppression. The Scottish COVID CAncer iMmunity Prevalence (SCCAMP) study aimed to characterise the incidence and outcomes of SARS-Cov-2 infection in patients undergoing active anti-cancer treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic and their antibody response following vaccination. Methods: Eligible patients were those attending secondary care for active anti-cancer treatment for a solid tumour. Blood samples were taken for total SARS-CoV-2 antibody assay (Siemens) at baseline and after 1.5, 3, 6 and 12 months. Data on COVID-19 infection, vaccination, cancer type, treatment and outcome (patient death) was obtained from routine electronic health records. Results: The study recruited 766 eligible participants between 28th May 2020 and 31st October 2021. During the study period there were 174 deaths (22%). The median age was 63 years, and 67% were female. Most received cytotoxic chemotherapy (79%), with the remaining 14% receiving immunotherapy and 7% receiving another form of anti-cancer therapy (radiotherapy, other systemic anti-cancer treatment). 48 (6.3%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR during the study period. The overall infection rate matched that of the local adult general population until May 2021, after which population levels appeared higher than the study population. Antibody testing detected additional evidence of infection prior to vaccination, taking the total number to 58 (7.6%). There was no significant difference in SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive test rates based on type of anti-cancer treatment. Mortality rates were similar between those who died within 90 days of a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR and those with no positive PCR (10.4% vs 10.6%). Death from all causes was lowest among vaccinated patients, and of the patients who had a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR at any time, all of those who died during the study period were unvaccinated. Multivariate analysis correcting for age, gender, socioeconomic status, Charlson co-morbidity score and number of previous medications revealed that vaccination was associated with a significantly lower infection rate regardless of treatment with chemotherapy or immunotherapy with hazard ratios of 0.307 (95% CI 0.144-0.6548) or 0.314 (95% CI 0.041-2.367) in vaccinated patients respectively. Where antibody data was available, 96.3% of patients successfully raised SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at a time point after vaccination. This was unaffected by treatment type. Conclusions: SCCAMP provides real-world evidence that patients with cancer undergoing SACT have a high antibody response and protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection following COVID-19 vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mahéva Vallet
- NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Lorna Alexander
- NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Isaac Bonisteel
- University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Maree Brennan
- NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - David A. Cameron
- Edinburgh University Cancer Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | - Elizabeth Furrie
- Ninewells Hospital and Dundee Medical School, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - Pamela Haig
- NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Mattea Heck
- University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Heather McVicars
- NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | - Kate Templeton
- NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Natalie Wilson
- NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Peter S. Hall
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Booth S, Curley HM, Varnai C, Arnold R, Lee LYW, Campton NA, Cook G, Purshouse K, Aries J, Innes A, Cook LB, Tomkins O, Oram HS, Tilby M, Kulasekararaj A, Wrench D, Dolly S, Newsom‐Davies T, Pettengell R, Gault A, Moody S, Mittal S, Altohami M, Tillet T, Illingworth J, Mukherjee L, Apperly J, Ashcroft J, Rabin N, Carmichael J, Cazier J, Kerr R, Middleton G, Collins GP, Palles C. Key findings from the UKCCMP cohort of 877 patients with haematological malignancy and COVID-19: disease control as an important factor relative to recent chemotherapy or anti-CD20 therapy. Br J Haematol 2022; 196:892-901. [PMID: 34761389 PMCID: PMC8652610 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.17937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Patients with haematological malignancies have a high risk of severe infection and death from SARS-CoV-2. In this prospective observational study, we investigated the impact of cancer type, disease activity, and treatment in 877 unvaccinated UK patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and active haematological cancer. The primary end-point was all-cause mortality. In a multivariate analysis adjusted for age, sex and comorbidities, the highest mortality was in patients with acute leukaemia [odds ratio (OR) = 1·73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·1-2·72, P = 0·017] and myeloma (OR 1·3, 95% CI 0·96-1·76, P = 0·08). Having uncontrolled cancer (newly diagnosed awaiting treatment as well as relapsed or progressive disease) was associated with increased mortality risk (OR = 2·45, 95% CI 1·09-5·5, P = 0·03), as was receiving second or beyond line of treatment (OR = 1·7, 95% CI 1·08-2·67, P = 0·023). We found no association between recent cytotoxic chemotherapy or anti-CD19/anti-CD20 treatment and increased risk of death within the limitations of the cohort size. Therefore, disease control is an important factor predicting mortality in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection alongside the possible risks of therapies such as cytotoxic treatment or anti-CD19/anti-CD20 treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Booth
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research CentreDepartment of HaematologyChurchill HospitalOxfordUK
| | - Helen M. Curley
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic SciencesUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
| | - Csilla Varnai
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic SciencesUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
- Centre for Computational BiologyUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
| | - Roland Arnold
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic SciencesUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
| | - Lennard Y. W. Lee
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic SciencesUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
- Department of OncologyOxford UniversityOxfordUK
| | - Naomi A. Campton
- Institute of Translational MedicineBirmingham Health PartnersBirminghamUK
| | - Gordon Cook
- NIHR (Leeds) MIC, LeedsSt James's Teaching Hospital, University of LeedsLeedsUK
| | - Karin Purshouse
- Edinburgh Cancer Research CentreUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - David Wrench
- Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | | | | | - Ruth Pettengell
- St Georges University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Abigail Gault
- NCCC Northern Centre for Cancer CareThe Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation TrustNewcastleUK
| | - Sam Moody
- NCCC Northern Centre for Cancer CareThe Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation TrustNewcastleUK
| | | | | | | | - Jack Illingworth
- BarkingHavering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS TrustEssexUK
| | | | | | - John Ashcroft
- NIHR (Leeds) MIC, LeedsSt James's Teaching Hospital, University of LeedsLeedsUK
- Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS TrustWakefieldUK
| | - Neil Rabin
- University College London HospitalsLondonUK
| | - Jonathan Carmichael
- NIHR (Leeds) MIC, LeedsSt James's Teaching Hospital, University of LeedsLeedsUK
| | - Jean‐Baptiste Cazier
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic SciencesUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
- Centre for Computational BiologyUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
| | - Rachel Kerr
- Department of OncologyOxford UniversityOxfordUK
| | - Gary Middleton
- Institute of Immunology and ImmunotherapyUniversity of BirminghamEdgbastonBirminghamUK
| | - Graham P. Collins
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research CentreDepartment of HaematologyChurchill HospitalOxfordUK
| | - Claire Palles
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic SciencesUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Várnai C, Palles C, Arnold R, Curley HM, Purshouse K, Cheng VWT, Booth S, Campton NA, Collins GP, Hughes DJ, Kulasekararaj AG, Lee AJX, Olsson-Brown AC, Sharma-Oates A, Van Hemelrijck M, Lee LYW, Kerr R, Middleton G, Cazier JB. Mortality Among Adults With Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy or Immunotherapy and Infected With COVID-19. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e220130. [PMID: 35188551 PMCID: PMC8861846 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Large cohorts of patients with active cancers and COVID-19 infection are needed to provide evidence of the association of recent cancer treatment and cancer type with COVID-19 mortality. Objective To evaluate whether systemic anticancer treatments (SACTs), tumor subtypes, patient demographic characteristics (age and sex), and comorbidities are associated with COVID-19 mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants The UK Coronavirus Cancer Monitoring Project (UKCCMP) is a prospective cohort study conducted at 69 UK cancer hospitals among adult patients (≥18 years) with an active cancer and a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19. Patients registered from March 18 to August 1, 2020, were included in this analysis. Exposures SACT, tumor subtype, patient demographic characteristics (eg, age, sex, body mass index, race and ethnicity, smoking history), and comorbidities were investigated. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was all-cause mortality within the primary hospitalization. Results Overall, 2515 of 2786 patients registered during the study period were included; 1464 (58%) were men; and the median (IQR) age was 72 (62-80) years. The mortality rate was 38% (966 patients). The data suggest an association between higher mortality in patients with hematological malignant neoplasms irrespective of recent SACT, particularly in those with acute leukemias or myelodysplastic syndrome (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.30-3.60) and myeloma or plasmacytoma (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.04-2.26). Lung cancer was also significantly associated with higher COVID-19-related mortality (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.11-2.25). No association between higher mortality and receiving chemotherapy in the 4 weeks before COVID-19 diagnosis was observed after correcting for the crucial confounders of age, sex, and comorbidities. An association between lower mortality and receiving immunotherapy in the 4 weeks before COVID-19 diagnosis was observed (immunotherapy vs no cancer therapy: OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.31-0.86). Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this study of patients with active cancer suggest that recent SACT is not associated with inferior outcomes from COVID-19 infection. This has relevance for the care of patients with cancer requiring treatment, particularly in countries experiencing an increase in COVID-19 case numbers. Important differences in outcomes among patients with hematological and lung cancers were observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Csilla Várnai
- Centre for Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Cancer Research UK Birmingham Centre, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Claire Palles
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Roland Arnold
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Helen M. Curley
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Karin Purshouse
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Vinton W. T. Cheng
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen Booth
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Department of Haematology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Naomi A. Campton
- Institute of Translational Medicine, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Graham P. Collins
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Department of Haematology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel J. Hughes
- Department of Cancer Imaging, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alvin J. X. Lee
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anna C. Olsson-Brown
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, United Kingdom
- The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Archana Sharma-Oates
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Mieke Van Hemelrijck
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lennard Y. W. Lee
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Kerr
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Gary Middleton
- Cancer Research UK Birmingham Centre, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Jean-Baptiste Cazier
- Centre for Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Cancer Research UK Birmingham Centre, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lee AJX, Purshouse K. COVID-19 and cancer registries: learning from the first peak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Br J Cancer 2021; 124:1777-1784. [PMID: 33767417 PMCID: PMC7992513 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01324-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The SARS-Cov-2 pandemic in 2020 has caused oncology teams around the world to adapt their practice in the aim of protecting patients. Early evidence from China indicated that patients with cancer, and particularly those who had recently received chemotherapy or surgery, were at increased risk of adverse outcomes following SARS-Cov-2 infection. Many registries of cancer patients infected with SARS-Cov-2 emerged during the first wave. We collate the evidence from these national and international studies and focus on the risk factors for patients with solid cancers and the contribution of systemic anti-cancer treatments (SACT-chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted and hormone therapy) to outcomes following SARS-Cov-2 infection. Patients with cancer infected with SARS-Cov-2 have a higher probability of death compared with patients without cancer. Common risk factors for mortality following COVID-19 include age, male sex, smoking history, number of comorbidities and poor performance status. Oncological features that may predict for worse outcomes include tumour stage, disease trajectory and lung cancer. Most studies did not identify an association between SACT and adverse outcomes. Recent data suggest that the timing of receipt of SACT may be associated with risk of mortality. Ongoing recruitment to these registries will enable us to provide evidence-based care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alvin J X Lee
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Karin Purshouse
- CRUK Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Torrance F, Purshouse K, Hall P, Mackean M, Phillips I. MA10.10 Lung Cancer Admission Rates During the COVID-19 Pandemic to a Tertiary Cancer Centre in South East Scotland. J Thorac Oncol 2021. [PMCID: PMC7976859 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.01.246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
11
|
Best J, Starkey T, Chatterjee A, Fackrell D, Pettit L, Srihari N, Tween H, Olsson-Brown A, Cheng V, Hughes DJ, Lee AJX, Purshouse K, Arnold R, Uk Coronavirus Cancer Monitoring Project Team, Sivakumar S, Cazier JB, Lee LYW. Coronavirus Disease 2019: the Pivotal Role of UK Clinical Oncology and the UK Coronavirus Cancer Monitoring Project. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:e50-e53. [PMID: 32593552 PMCID: PMC7274595 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Revised: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- J Best
- Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, UK
| | - T Starkey
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - A Chatterjee
- Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, UK
| | - D Fackrell
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - L Pettit
- Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, UK
| | - N Srihari
- Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, UK
| | - H Tween
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK
| | | | - V Cheng
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Bexley Wing, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - D J Hughes
- Department of Cancer Imaging, Division of Cancer Studies, Guy's Campus, King's College London, London, UK
| | - A J X Lee
- University College London, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - K Purshouse
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - R Arnold
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - S Sivakumar
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - J-B Cazier
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Centre for Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - L Y W Lee
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lee LYW, Cazier JB, Starkey T, Briggs SEW, Arnold R, Bisht V, Booth S, Campton NA, Cheng VWT, Collins G, Curley HM, Earwaker P, Fittall MW, Gennatas S, Goel A, Hartley S, Hughes DJ, Kerr D, Lee AJX, Lee RJ, Lee SM, Mckenzie H, Middleton CP, Murugaesu N, Newsom-Davis T, Olsson-Brown AC, Palles C, Powles T, Protheroe EA, Purshouse K, Sharma-Oates A, Sivakumar S, Smith AJ, Topping O, Turnbull CD, Várnai C, Briggs ADM, Middleton G, Kerr R. COVID-19 prevalence and mortality in patients with cancer and the effect of primary tumour subtype and patient demographics: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:1309-1316. [PMID: 32853557 PMCID: PMC7444972 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30442-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 399] [Impact Index Per Article: 99.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with cancer are purported to have poor COVID-19 outcomes. However, cancer is a heterogeneous group of diseases, encompassing a spectrum of tumour subtypes. The aim of this study was to investigate COVID-19 risk according to tumour subtype and patient demographics in patients with cancer in the UK. METHODS We compared adult patients with cancer enrolled in the UK Coronavirus Cancer Monitoring Project (UKCCMP) cohort between March 18 and May 8, 2020, with a parallel non-COVID-19 UK cancer control population from the UK Office for National Statistics (2017 data). The primary outcome of the study was the effect of primary tumour subtype, age, and sex and on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) prevalence and the case-fatality rate during hospital admission. We analysed the effect of tumour subtype and patient demographics (age and sex) on prevalence and mortality from COVID-19 using univariable and multivariable models. FINDINGS 319 (30·6%) of 1044 patients in the UKCCMP cohort died, 295 (92·5%) of whom had a cause of death recorded as due to COVID-19. The all-cause case-fatality rate in patients with cancer after SARS-CoV-2 infection was significantly associated with increasing age, rising from 0·10 in patients aged 40-49 years to 0·48 in those aged 80 years and older. Patients with haematological malignancies (leukaemia, lymphoma, and myeloma) had a more severe COVID-19 trajectory compared with patients with solid organ tumours (odds ratio [OR] 1·57, 95% CI 1·15-2·15; p<0·0043). Compared with the rest of the UKCCMP cohort, patients with leukaemia showed a significantly increased case-fatality rate (2·25, 1·13-4·57; p=0·023). After correction for age and sex, patients with haematological malignancies who had recent chemotherapy had an increased risk of death during COVID-19-associated hospital admission (OR 2·09, 95% CI 1·09-4·08; p=0·028). INTERPRETATION Patients with cancer with different tumour types have differing susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 phenotypes. We generated individualised risk tables for patients with cancer, considering age, sex, and tumour subtype. Our results could be useful to assist physicians in informed risk-benefit discussions to explain COVID-19 risk and enable an evidenced-based approach to national social isolation policies. FUNDING University of Birmingham and University of Oxford.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lennard Y W Lee
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jean-Baptiste Cazier
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Centre for Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Thomas Starkey
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sarah E W Briggs
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Roland Arnold
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Vartika Bisht
- Centre for Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Stephen Booth
- Department of Haematology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Naomi A Campton
- Institute of Translational Medicine, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
| | - Vinton W T Cheng
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Graham Collins
- Department of Haematology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Helen M Curley
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | | | - Anshita Goel
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Simon Hartley
- Centre for Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Advanced Research Computing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Daniel J Hughes
- Department of Cancer Imaging, King's College London, London, UK
| | - David Kerr
- Nuffield Division of Clinical and Laboratory Services, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Alvin J X Lee
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rebecca J Lee
- The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Chris P Middleton
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Centre for Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nirupa Murugaesu
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Tom Newsom-Davis
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Claire Palles
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Emily A Protheroe
- University of Birmingham Medical School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Karin Purshouse
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Chris D Turnbull
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Csilla Várnai
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Centre for Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Gary Middleton
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Rachel Kerr
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Olsson-Brown A, Hughes D, Purshouse K, Lee L, Cheng V, Lee A, Protheroe E, Smith A, Curley H, Arnold R, Cazier JB, D'Costa J, Palles C, Campton N, Varnai C, Sivakumar S, Kerr R, Middleton G. 1703P UK Coronavirus Cancer Monitoring Project (UKCCMP): A national reporting network for real time data of the COVID-19 pandemic. Ann Oncol 2020. [PMCID: PMC7506390 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.1767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|
14
|
Pickles OJ, Lee LYW, Starkey T, Freeman-Mills L, Olsson-Brown A, Cheng V, Hughes DJ, Lee A, Purshouse K, Middleton G. Immune checkpoint blockade: releasing the breaks or a protective barrier to COVID-19 severe acute respiratory syndrome? Br J Cancer 2020; 123:691-693. [PMID: 32546835 PMCID: PMC7296191 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-0930-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The rapid emergence of COVID-19 has sent shockwaves through healthcare systems globally, with cancer patients at increased risk. The interplay of the virus and host immune system has been implicated in the development of ARDS. Immunotherapy agents have the potential to adversely potentiate this phenomenon, requiring careful real-world observation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver J Pickles
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Lennard Y W Lee
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
| | - Thomas Starkey
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Luke Freeman-Mills
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Anna Olsson-Brown
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Bebington, Wirral, CH63 4JY, UK
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK
| | - Vinton Cheng
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Daniel J Hughes
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Alvin Lee
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Karin Purshouse
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, EH4 2XR, UK
| | - Gary Middleton
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lee LY, Cazier JB, Angelis V, Arnold R, Bisht V, Campton NA, Chackathayil J, Cheng VW, Curley HM, Fittall MW, Freeman-Mills L, Gennatas S, Goel A, Hartley S, Hughes DJ, Kerr D, Lee AJ, Lee RJ, McGrath SE, Middleton CP, Murugaesu N, Newsom-Davis T, Okines AF, Olsson-Brown AC, Palles C, Pan Y, Pettengell R, Powles T, Protheroe EA, Purshouse K, Sharma-Oates A, Sivakumar S, Smith AJ, Starkey T, Turnbull CD, Várnai C, Yousaf N, Kerr R, Middleton G. COVID-19 mortality in patients with cancer on chemotherapy or other anticancer treatments: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2020; 395:1919-1926. [PMID: 32473682 PMCID: PMC7255715 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31173-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 781] [Impact Index Per Article: 195.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals with cancer, particularly those who are receiving systemic anticancer treatments, have been postulated to be at increased risk of mortality from COVID-19. This conjecture has considerable effect on the treatment of patients with cancer and data from large, multicentre studies to support this assumption are scarce because of the contingencies of the pandemic. We aimed to describe the clinical and demographic characteristics and COVID-19 outcomes in patients with cancer. METHODS In this prospective observational study, all patients with active cancer and presenting to our network of cancer centres were eligible for enrolment into the UK Coronavirus Cancer Monitoring Project (UKCCMP). The UKCCMP is the first COVID-19 clinical registry that enables near real-time reports to frontline doctors about the effects of COVID-19 on patients with cancer. Eligible patients tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 on RT-PCR assay from a nose or throat swab. We excluded patients with a radiological or clinical diagnosis of COVID-19, without a positive RT-PCR test. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, or discharge from hospital, as assessed by the reporting sites during the patient hospital admission. FINDINGS From March 18, to April 26, 2020, we analysed 800 patients with a diagnosis of cancer and symptomatic COVID-19. 412 (52%) patients had a mild COVID-19 disease course. 226 (28%) patients died and risk of death was significantly associated with advancing patient age (odds ratio 9·42 [95% CI 6·56-10·02]; p<0·0001), being male (1·67 [1·19-2·34]; p=0·003), and the presence of other comorbidities such as hypertension (1·95 [1·36-2·80]; p<0·001) and cardiovascular disease (2·32 [1·47-3·64]). 281 (35%) patients had received cytotoxic chemotherapy within 4 weeks before testing positive for COVID-19. After adjusting for age, gender, and comorbidities, chemotherapy in the past 4 weeks had no significant effect on mortality from COVID-19 disease, when compared with patients with cancer who had not received recent chemotherapy (1·18 [0·81-1·72]; p=0·380). We found no significant effect on mortality for patients with immunotherapy, hormonal therapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy use within the past 4 weeks. INTERPRETATION Mortality from COVID-19 in cancer patients appears to be principally driven by age, gender, and comorbidities. We are not able to identify evidence that cancer patients on cytotoxic chemotherapy or other anticancer treatment are at an increased risk of mortality from COVID-19 disease compared with those not on active treatment. FUNDING University of Birmingham, University of Oxford.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lennard Yw Lee
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Centre for Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Jean-Baptiste Cazier
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Centre for Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Roland Arnold
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Vartika Bisht
- Centre for Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Naomi A Campton
- Institute of Translational Medicine, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
| | - Julia Chackathayil
- Cancer Research Clinical Research Facility, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Vinton Wt Cheng
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Helen M Curley
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | | | - Anshita Goel
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Simon Hartley
- Centre for Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Advanced Research Computing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Daniel J Hughes
- Department of Cancer Imaging, King's College London, London, UK
| | - David Kerr
- Nuffield Division of Clinical and Laboratory Services, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Alvin Jx Lee
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rebecca J Lee
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Christopher P Middleton
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Centre for Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nirupa Murugaesu
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Thomas Newsom-Davis
- Department of Oncology, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Claire Palles
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Yi Pan
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Centre for Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - Emily A Protheroe
- University of Birmingham Medical School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Karin Purshouse
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | | | - Thomas Starkey
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Csilla Várnai
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Centre for Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nadia Yousaf
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rachel Kerr
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Gary Middleton
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Figueroa JD, Brennan PM, Theodoratou E, Poon MTC, Purshouse K, Din FVN, Jin K, Mesa-Eguiagaray I, Dunlop MG, Hall PS, Cameron D, Wild SH, Sudlow CLM. Distinguishing between direct and indirect consequences of covid-19. BMJ 2020; 369:m2377. [PMID: 32540857 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m2377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Kai Jin
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Anil I, Arnold R, Benkwitz-Beford S, Branford S, Campton N, Cazier JB, Cheng V, Curley H, D'Costa J, Edmondson A, Goel A, Hartley S, Hughes DJ, Kerr R, Lee A, Lee LYW, Longworth N, Middleton C, Middleton G, Naksukpaiboon P, Olsson-Brown A, Palles C, Purshouse K, Sandys C, Sharma-Oates A, Sivakumar S, Smith A, Starkey T, Thompson S, Varnai C. The UK Coronavirus Cancer Monitoring Project: protecting patients with cancer in the era of COVID-19. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:622-624. [PMID: 32304634 PMCID: PMC7159870 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30230-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
18
|
Purshouse K, Chamberlain S, Soares M, Tuthill M, Protheroe A, Mole DR. Case report of oxalate nephropathy in a patient with pancreatic metastases from renal carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:967. [PMID: 31623580 PMCID: PMC6798420 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6215-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2019] [Accepted: 09/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with metastatic renal carcinoma frequently have pre-existing renal impairment and not infrequently develop worsening renal function as a complication of their treatment. The presence of pancreatic metastases in patients with metastatic renal carcinoma, often confers a more favourable prognosis and as a consequence this patient group may be exposed to such treatments for more prolonged periods of time. However, the development of renal failure may also be a consequence of the cancer itself rather than its treatment. CASE PRESENTATION We present an 84-year-old patient receiving the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) pazopanib for metastatic renal carcinoma who developed oxalate nephropathy as a consequence of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency resulting from pancreatic metastases. CONCLUSIONS This case demonstrates the importance of investigating unexpected toxicities and highlights the potential consequences of pancreatic insufficiency and its sequelae in patients with pancreatic metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Purshouse
- Department of Oncology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, OX3 7LE UK
| | - Sarah Chamberlain
- Department of Oncology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, OX3 7LE UK
| | - Maria Soares
- Department of Cellular Pathology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, OX3 9DU UK
| | - Mark Tuthill
- Department of Oncology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, OX3 7LE UK
| | - Andrew Protheroe
- Department of Oncology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, OX3 7LE UK
| | - David R. Mole
- Oxford Kidney Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, OX3 9DU UK
- NDM Research Building, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7FZ UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Woodcock VK, Purshouse K, Butcher C, Haddon C, Verrall G, Elhussein L, Salio M, Middleton MR, Cerundolo V, Crew J, Protheroe A. A phase I study to assess the safety and tolerability of intravesical pembrolizumab in recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.7_suppl.406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
406 Background: Intravesical BCG has been the mainstay of therapy following TURBT for intermediate risk NMIBC for many years and is thought to act through activation of non-specific local immunity. With the recent success of checkpoint inhibitor treatment in metastatic bladder cancer, we sought to investigate the anti-PD1 inhibitor pembrolizumab as a potential agent for use in patients with intermediate risk NMIBC in a phase I/II study. The primary aim of the phase I safety run-in was to assess the safety and tolerability of intravesical pembrolizumab after TURBT in patients with intermediate risk NMIBC. Methods: Eligible patients had recurrent NMIBC for which adjuvant treatment post TURBT was a reasonable treatment option, ECOG PS 0-1 and adequate end organ function. Pembrolizumab was administered by intravesical instillation once weekly for a total of 6 doses. Intra-patient dose escalation was performed in three paired patient cohorts with doses starting at 50mg and increasing through 100mg to a maximum of 200mg. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed using CTCAE v4.03 with dose limiting toxicity (DLT) defined as a clinically significant, drug related, grade 4 haematological or ≥ grade 3 non-haematological toxicity occurring within 7 days of administration of the first treatment at a given dose for that patient. Results: In the first 4 patients treated, no DLTs were seen during dose escalation. Drug-related AEs included Grade 1 dysuria, fatigue and nausea. Grade 1-2 urinary tract infections, Grade 1 cystitis and Grade 3 urosepsis (SAE) were observed but assessed as probably not related to pembrolizumab. Recruitment of a final cohort of two patients at repeated doses of 200mg is ongoing to confirm safety and tolerability of this dose. Conclusions: Administration of intravesical pembrolizumab was safe and well tolerated in patients with NMIBC following TURBT. A randomised, parallel group, phase II marker-lesion study to assess the safety, efficacy and tolerability of either intravesical pembrolizumab or intravenous pembrolizumab in a larger cohort of patients with intermediate risk recurrent NMIBC is planned. Clinical trial information: NCT03167151.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karin Purshouse
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Chrissie Butcher
- Oncology Clinical Trials Office, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline Haddon
- Early Phase Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Gillian Verrall
- Department of Urology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Leena Elhussein
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Mariolina Salio
- MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Mark R. Middleton
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Vincenzo Cerundolo
- MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jeremy Crew
- Department of Urology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Protheroe
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Purshouse K, Woodcock V, Butcher C, Haddon C, Verrall G, Elhussein L, Salio M, Middleton M, Cerundolo V, Kwok J, Blagden S, Protheroe A, Crew J. A phase I study to assess the safety and tolerability of intravesical pembrolizumab in recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/s1569-9056(19)30564-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
21
|
Purshouse K, Protheroe AS. Abiraterone acetate in combination with prednisone in the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: clinical evidence and experience. Ther Adv Urol 2019; 11:1756287218820804. [PMID: 30671143 PMCID: PMC6329025 DOI: 10.1177/1756287218820804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
More than a million men worldwide are diagnosed with prostate cancer every year. After androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), chemotherapy has been the only subsequent intervention to improve survival in the metastatic setting but has limitations for patients who may not tolerate its toxicity profile or are not candidates on the basis of comorbidities. Novel anti-androgens such as abiraterone acetate have shown promise for such patients. This review draws on clinical evidence and experience to identify abiraterone as a well-tolerated, effective alternative to docetaxel. In the castration-resistant setting, studies demonstrated a survival benefit over placebo, prompting further trials in the hormone-naïve population. More recently the STAMPEDE and LATITUDE studies suggest abiraterone has comparable survival outcomes to docetaxel in the castration-sensitive setting, with evidence in favour of its quality of life profile. Available comparisons with docetaxel are limited, but those available suggest they have comparable efficacy. However, the significant cost compared with docetaxel is a major barrier in resource-rationed healthcare settings. Overall, abiraterone is an effective alternative to chemotherapy for men with castration-sensitive prostate cancer, but this should be balanced with the significantly greater cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Purshouse
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK
| | - Andrew S Protheroe
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ng N, Purshouse K, Foskolou IP, Olcina MM, Hammond EM. Challenges to DNA replication in hypoxic conditions. FEBS J 2018; 285:1563-1571. [PMID: 29288533 DOI: 10.1111/febs.14377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2017] [Revised: 12/05/2017] [Accepted: 12/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The term hypoxia refers to any condition where insufficient oxygen is available and therefore encompasses a range of actual oxygen concentrations. The regions of tumours adjacent to necrotic areas are at almost anoxic levels and are known to be extremely therapy resistant (radiobiological hypoxia). The biological response to radiobiological hypoxia includes the rapid accumulation of replication stress and subsequent DNA damage response, including both ATR- and ATM-mediated signalling, despite the absence of detectable DNA damage. The causes and consequences of hypoxia-induced replication stress will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Ng
- Department of Oncology, CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Karin Purshouse
- Department of Oncology, CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Iosifina P Foskolou
- Department of Oncology, CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Monica M Olcina
- Division of Radiation and Cancer Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, CA, USA
| | - Ester M Hammond
- Department of Oncology, CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Purshouse K, Schuh A, Fairfax BP, Knight S, Antoniou P, Dreau H, Popitsch N, Gatter K, Roberts I, Browning L, Traill Z, Kerr D, Verrill C, Tuthill M, Taylor JC, Protheroe A. Whole-genome sequencing identifies homozygous BRCA2 deletion guiding treatment in dedifferentiated prostate cancer. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud 2017; 3:a001362. [PMID: 28487881 PMCID: PMC5411692 DOI: 10.1101/mcs.a001362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has transformed the understanding of the genetic drivers of cancer and is increasingly being used in cancer medicine to identify personalized therapies. Here we describe a case in which the application of WGS identified a tumoral BRCA2 deletion in a patient with aggressive dedifferentiated prostate cancer that was repeat-biopsied after disease progression. This would not have been detected by standard BRCA testing, and it led to additional treatment with a maintenance poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor following platinum-based chemotherapy. This case demonstrates that repeat biopsy upon disease progression and application of WGS to tumor samples has meaningful clinical utility and the potential to transform outcomes in patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Purshouse
- Oxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LE, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Schuh
- Oxford National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre/NHS Translational Diagnostics Centre, The Joint Research Office, The Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LE, United Kingdom
| | - Benjamin P Fairfax
- Oxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LE, United Kingdom.,Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Knight
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, United Kingdom
| | - Pavlos Antoniou
- Oxford National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre/NHS Translational Diagnostics Centre, The Joint Research Office, The Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LE, United Kingdom
| | - Helene Dreau
- Oxford National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre/NHS Translational Diagnostics Centre, The Joint Research Office, The Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LE, United Kingdom
| | - Niko Popitsch
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, United Kingdom
| | - Kevin Gatter
- Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
| | - Ian Roberts
- Molecular Oncology and Haematology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DS, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa Browning
- Department of Cellular Pathology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
| | - Zoe Traill
- Department of Radiology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
| | - David Kerr
- Oxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LE, United Kingdom
| | - Clare Verrill
- Department of Cellular Pathology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Tuthill
- Oxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LE, United Kingdom
| | - Jenny C Taylor
- Oxford National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre/NHS Translational Diagnostics Centre, The Joint Research Office, The Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LE, United Kingdom.,Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Protheroe
- Oxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LE, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Purshouse K, Ngoma T, Kerr D. Tale of Two Fellows. J Glob Oncol 2017; 3:431-432. [PMID: 29094078 PMCID: PMC5646875 DOI: 10.1200/jgo.17.00050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Purshouse
- and , University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; and , Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Twalib Ngoma
- and , University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; and , Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - David Kerr
- and , University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; and , Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sulkowski P, Corso C, Robinson N, Scanlon S, Purshouse K, Bai H, Liu Y, Sundaram R, Hegan D, Fons N, Breuer G, Song Y, Mishra K, Feyter HD, Graaf RD, Surovtseva Y, Kachman M, Halene S, Gunel M, Glazer P, Bindra RS. Abstract LB-290: Oncometabolites induce a BRCAness state that can be exploited by PARP inhibitors. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-lb-290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
2-Hydroxyglutarate (2HG) exists as two enantiomers, R-2HG and S-2HG, and both are implicated in tumor progression via their inhibitory effects on α-ketoglutarate (αKG)-dependent dioxygenases. The former is an oncometabolite that is induced by the neomorphic activity conferred by isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 and -2 (IDH1/2) mutations, while the latter is produced under pathologic process such as hypoxia. Recurring IDH1/2 mutations were first identified gliomas and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and subsequently they were found in multiple other tumor types. Many IDH1/2-mutant tumors are known to be chemo- and radiosensitive, although the mechanisms underlying this enhanced sensitivity have been elusive. Here, we report that IDH1/2 mutations induce a homologous recombination (HR) defect which renders tumor cells exquisitely sensitive to Poly (ADP-Ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Remarkably, this “BRCAness” phenotype can be completely reversed by small molecule mutant IDH1/2 inhibitors, and it can be entirely recapitulated by treatment with either 2HG enantiomer in cells with intact IDH1/2. We performed a comprehensive series of studies directly implicate two αKG-dependent dioxygenases, KDM4A and KDM4B, as key mediators of the observed phenotype. In addition, we demonstrate that 2HG-induced HR suppression cannot be explained by mutant IDH1/2-associated alterations in NAD+ levels. We have demonstrated IDH1/2-dependent PARP inhibitor sensitivity in a range of clinically relevant models, including primary patient-derived glioma cells and AML bone marrow cultures in vitro, as well as genetically-matched tumor xenografts in vivo. Finally, we have extended these findings to several structurally related and clinically relevant oncometabolites. We demonstrate profound synthetic lethality with PARP inhibitors in tumors which produce these other oncometabolites, and our data suggest a similar mechanism of action via which HR is suppressed. Small molecule inhibition of oncogenic kinases is a pillar of precision medicine in modern oncology, and this approach has been extrapolated to treat IDH1/2-mutant and other oncometabolite-producing cancers with small molecule inhibitors which block the neomorphic activity of the mutant proteins. The findings present here directly challenge this therapeutic strategy, and they instead provide a novel approach to treat these tumors oncometabolite-producing tumors with DNA repair inhibitors. Furthermore, our results uncover an unexpected link between oncometabolites, altered DNA repair and genetic instability. We previously reported that hypoxia suppresses HR, driving genetic instability and conferring a BRCAness phenotype in hypoxic tumor cells. It is tempting to speculate that the findings reported here provide a novel commonality between hypoxia and IDH1/2 mutations as mediating a “hit-and-run” mechanism for genetic instability and tumor progression through 2HG, but at the same time bestowing a vulnerability to PARP inhibition that can be therapeutically exploited. Based on these findings, we are planning a multi-center Phase II trial testing the efficacy of olaparib for the treatment of recurrent IDH1/2-mutant tumors, and we anticipate this trial will be open for enrollment later this year.
Citation Format: Parker Sulkowski, Christopher Corso, Nathaniel Robinson, Susan Scanlon, Karin Purshouse, Hanwen Bai, Yanfeng Liu, Ranjini Sundaram, Denise Hegan, Nathan Fons, Gregory Breuer, Yuanbin Song, Ketu Mishra, Henk De Feyter, Robin de Graaf, Yulia Surovtseva, Maureen Kachman, Stephanie Halene, Murat Gunel, Peter Glazer, Ranjit S. Bindra. Oncometabolites induce a BRCAness state that can be exploited by PARP inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-290. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-LB-290
Collapse
|
26
|
Purshouse K, Watson RA, Church DN, Richardson C, Crane G, Traill Z, Sullivan M, Roberts I, Browning L, Turner G, Parameshwaran V, Johnson J, Chitnis M, Protheroe A, Verrill C. Value of Supraregional Multidisciplinary Review for the Contemporary Management of Testicular Tumors. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2017; 15:152-156. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2016] [Revised: 04/27/2016] [Accepted: 05/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
27
|
da Motta LL, Ledaki I, Purshouse K, Haider S, De Bastiani MA, Baban D, Morotti M, Steers G, Wigfield S, Bridges E, Li JL, Knapp S, Ebner D, Klamt F, Harris AL, McIntyre A. The BET inhibitor JQ1 selectively impairs tumour response to hypoxia and downregulates CA9 and angiogenesis in triple negative breast cancer. Oncogene 2017; 36:122-132. [PMID: 27292261 PMCID: PMC5061082 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2016.184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2015] [Revised: 03/22/2016] [Accepted: 04/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The availability of bromodomain and extra-terminal inhibitors (BETi) has enabled translational epigenetic studies in cancer. BET proteins regulate transcription by selectively recognizing acetylated lysine residues on chromatin. BETi compete with this process leading to both downregulation and upregulation of gene expression. Hypoxia enables progression of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), the most aggressive form of breast cancer, partly by driving metabolic adaptation, angiogenesis and metastasis through upregulation of hypoxia-regulated genes (for example, carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9) and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A). Responses to hypoxia can be mediated epigenetically, thus we investigated whether BETi JQ1 could impair the TNBC response induced by hypoxia and exert anti-tumour effects. JQ1 significantly modulated 44% of hypoxia-induced genes, of which two-thirds were downregulated including CA9 and VEGF-A. JQ1 prevented HIF binding to the hypoxia response element in CA9 promoter, but did not alter HIF expression or activity, suggesting some HIF targets are BET-dependent. JQ1 reduced TNBC growth in vitro and in vivo and inhibited xenograft vascularization. These findings identify that BETi dually targets angiogenesis and the hypoxic response, an effective combination at reducing tumour growth in preclinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L L da Motta
- Molecular Oncology Laboratories, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Biochemistry/UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil
- CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, Brasilia, Brazil
| | - I Ledaki
- Molecular Oncology Laboratories, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - K Purshouse
- Molecular Oncology Laboratories, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - S Haider
- Molecular Oncology Laboratories, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - D Baban
- High Throughput Genomics, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - M Morotti
- Molecular Oncology Laboratories, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - G Steers
- Molecular Oncology Laboratories, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - S Wigfield
- Molecular Oncology Laboratories, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - E Bridges
- Molecular Oncology Laboratories, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - J-L Li
- Molecular Oncology Laboratories, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine, Plymouth University, Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK
| | - S Knapp
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Goethe University Frankfurt, Institute for Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Buchmann Institute for Life Sciences, Campus Riedberg, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - D Ebner
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, Target Discovery Institute (TDI), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - F Klamt
- Department of Biochemistry/UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - A L Harris
- Molecular Oncology Laboratories, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - A McIntyre
- Molecular Oncology Laboratories, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Cancer Biology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sinha R, Lecamwasam K, Purshouse K, Reed J, Middleton MR, Fearfield L. Toxic epidermal necrolysis in a patient receiving vemurafenib for treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma. Br J Dermatol 2015; 170:997-9. [PMID: 24359127 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.12796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- R Sinha
- Department of Dermatology, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH, U.K
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Purshouse K. Access all areas. Assoc Med J 2013. [DOI: 10.1136/sbmj.f2489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
30
|
Sturge J, Caley MP, Purshouse K, Fonseca AV, Rodriguez-Teja M, Kogianni G, Waxman J, Palmieri C. Abstract P2-02-03: The Collagen Receptor Endo180: A Metastatic Plasma Marker In Breast Cancer Modulated By Bisphosphonate Treatment. Cancer Res 2012. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs12-p2-02-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose: To establish whether the collagen remodelling receptor, Endo180, should be given consideration as a useful plasma marker in metastatic breast cancer.
Patients and Methods: Analysis of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell conditioned medium validated the anti-human (39.10) monoclonal antibody as suitable for the detection of soluble Endo180 in plasma. Eighty-seven breast cancer patients with early primary, locally advanced and metastatic disease were included in the study. Correlations between Endo180, CA 15–3 antigen (MUC1; mucin 1) and bisphosphonate treatment were investigated.
Results: Endo180 was elevated in metastatic compared to early breast cancer (P <.0001) and was able to differentiate locoregional disease and visceral and/or osseous metastasis (P = .0005). In combination CA 15–3 antigen (cut-off: 28 U/mL) and Endo180 (relative plasma level cut-off range: 0.95–1.65) had sensitivity of 94–97% and specificity of 52–68%. Endo180 levels were significantly higher in patients who were treatment naive (2.17 ± 0.82, N = 13) compared to those previously (1.82 ± 0.33, N = 5) or currently (1.37 ± 0.74, N = 24) receiving bisphosphonates (P = .011). In the bisphosphonate naive setting (N = 57) the combination of Endo180 (relative plasma level cut-off range: 0.95–1.65) and CA 15–3 antigen (cut-off: 28 U/mL) had a sensitivity of 87–92% and specificity of 72–79%.
Conclusion: Endo180 is a plasma marker with high sensitivity in metastatic breast cancer that can be modulated by bisphosphonate treatment.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-02-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Sturge
- Imperial College London, United Kingdom; The University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - MP Caley
- Imperial College London, United Kingdom; The University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - K Purshouse
- Imperial College London, United Kingdom; The University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - A-V Fonseca
- Imperial College London, United Kingdom; The University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - M Rodriguez-Teja
- Imperial College London, United Kingdom; The University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - G Kogianni
- Imperial College London, United Kingdom; The University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - J Waxman
- Imperial College London, United Kingdom; The University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - C Palmieri
- Imperial College London, United Kingdom; The University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Mukaetova-Ladinska EB, Purshouse K, Andrade J, Krishnan M, Jagger C, Kalaria RN. Can healthy lifestyle modify risk factors for dementia? Findings from a pilot community-based survey in Chennai (India) and Newcastle (UK). Neuroepidemiology 2012; 39:163-70. [PMID: 22948094 DOI: 10.1159/000338674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2011] [Accepted: 03/30/2012] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently there are no effective treatments available for dementia. Attention has turned to defining preventive strategies and identifying modifying effects of lifestyle, including physical activity, diet, alcohol intake and smoking, in reducing cognitive decline and overt memory problems in the elderly. METHODS In this study, we addressed the modifying aspects of various components of lifestyle in two ageing samples and explored the possible effects that exercise, diet and spiritual and religious beliefs have upon physical and mental health. A total of 251 subjects (128 in Chennai, India, and 123 in Newcastle, UK) filled in a questionnaire regarding their lifestyle habits. Data were analysed with χ² analysis. RESULTS Our findings highlight that spiritual and religious beliefs promoted good physical and mental health and were negatively associated with risk factors for dementia, such as high blood pressure, high cholesterol level and diabetes. Lifelong diet and physical activity also contributed to better overall well-being in both samples. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests substantial lifestyle variations between two urban populations in Chennai, India, and Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK. Further detailed work is required to identify the lifestyle components that have the greatest impact on modifying the known risk factors for dementia.
Collapse
|
32
|
Andrade J, Purshouse K, Mukaetova-Ladinska E. Can healthy lifestyle modify risk factors for dementia? findings from a pilot population-based survey. Eur Psychiatry 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/s0924-9338(11)72189-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
IntroductionAspects of lifestyle are a key component to successful ageing and reducing the risk of cognitive impairment. Many developing countries, including India, currently have a much lower rate of dementia in people of the same age in the UK (Alzheimer’s Disease International 2008), in contrast to the higher prevalence rates of cardiovascular risk factors (reviewed in Misra and Kurana, 2009).ObjectivesCompare lifestyle choices in a developed and a developing country, that show contrasting dementia prevalence rates.AimsIdentify protective factors that may reduce dementia prevalence.MethodsA total of 251 participants at public meetings (123 in Newcastle and 128 in Chennai) on ageing completed a questionnaire voluntarily regarding their lifestyle, health status, 4-item GDS, and their subjective perception of their mental and physical health. The two groups had similar sociodemographic characteristics.ResultsDiabetes was three times more prevalent in the Chennai group (p = 0.001) but a significantly higher proportion of the Chennai population reported receiving treatment for diabetes (p = 0.012). Vegeterian diet was more frequent in the Chennai cohort (p = 0.000), as well as curry consumption (p = 0.000). The Newcastle group consumed more alcohol (p = 0.000) and practiced exercise less often (p = 0.005). Not surprinsingly, 95% of the Indian is religious, in contrast to 59.7% of the English (p = 0.000).ConclusionsType of diet, curry and alcohol consumption, and religious or spiritual beliefs, were the most significantly different, and may therefore confer protective advantages for dementia. Other explanations could be a higher proportion of uncontrolled diabetes and inactive people in the Newcastle sample.
Collapse
|
33
|
Purshouse K, Mukaetova-Ladinska E. Dance therapy for Alzheimer’s disease. Assoc Med J 2009. [DOI: 10.1136/sbmj.b595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
34
|
Purshouse K, Mukaetova-Ladinska E. Dance therapy for Alzheimer's disease. Assoc Med J 2009. [DOI: 10.1136/sbmj.0903112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|