1
|
Huang W, Liu W, Yu T, Zhang Z, Zhai L, Huang P, Lu Y. Effect of anti-COVID-19 drugs on patients with cancer. Eur J Med Chem 2024; 268:116214. [PMID: 38367490 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2024.116214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
The clinical treatment of patients with cancer who are also diagnosed with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has been a challenging issue since the outbreak of COVID-19. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the effects of commonly used drugs for treating COVID-19 in patients with cancer. Hence, this review aims to provide a reference for the clinical treatment of patients with cancer to minimize the losses caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study, we also focused on the relationship between COVID-19, commonly used drugs for treating COVID-19, and cancer. We specifically investigated the effect of these drugs on tumor cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and apoptosis. The potential mechanisms of action of these drugs were discussed and evaluated. We found that most of these drugs showed inhibitory effects on tumors, and only in a few cases had cancer-promoting effects. Furthermore, inappropriate usage of these drugs may lead to irreversible kidney and heart damage. Finally, we have clarified the use of different drugs, which can provide useful guidance for the clinical treatment of cancer patients diagnosed with COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weicai Huang
- School of Basic Medicine, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi 341000, China
| | - Wenyu Liu
- School of Basic Medicine, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi 341000, China
| | - Tingting Yu
- School of Basic Medicine, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi 341000, China
| | - Zhaoyang Zhang
- School of Basic Medicine, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi 341000, China
| | - Lingyun Zhai
- Gynecology Department, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, China
| | - Panpan Huang
- School of Basic Medicine, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi 341000, China.
| | - Yao Lu
- School of Basic Medicine, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi 341000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mostaghim A, Minkove S, Aguilar-Company J, Ruiz-Camps I, Eremiev-Eremiev S, Dettorre GM, Fox L, Tondini C, Brunet J, Carmona-García MC, Lambertini M, Bower M, Newsom-Davis T, Sharkey R, Pria AD, Rossi M, Plaja A, Salazar R, Sureda A, Prat A, Michalarea V, Van Hemelrijck M, Sita-Lumsden A, Bertuzzi A, Rimassa L, Rossi S, Rizzo G, Pedrazzoli P, Lee AJ, Murphy C, Belessiotis K, Diamantis N, Mukherjee U, Pommeret F, Stoclin A, Martinez-Vila C, Bruna R, Gaidano G, D'Avanzo F, Gennari A, Athale J, Eichacker P, Pinato DJ, Torabi-Parizi P, Cortellini A. Previous immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy is associated with decreased COVID-19-related hospitalizations and complications in patients with cancer: Results of a propensity-matched analysis of the OnCovid registry. Int J Infect Dis 2024; 139:13-20. [PMID: 38029831 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2023.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To date, studies have not provided definitive answers regarding whether previous immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment alters outcomes for cancer patients with COVID-19. METHODS The OnCovid registry (NCT04393974) was searched from February 27, 2020, to January 31, 2022, for patients who received systemic anti-cancer therapy in the 4 weeks before laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis. Propensity-score matching using country, vaccination status, primary tumor type, sex, age, comorbidity burden, tumor stage, and remission status investigated differences in predefined clinical outcomes comparing those who had or had not received ICIs. RESULTS Of 3523 patients screened, 137 ICI-only and 1378 non-ICI met inclusion criteria. Before matching, ICI patients were older, male, enrolled at centers in Italy, and had histories of smoking, thoracic cancers, advanced cancer stages, and active malignancies (P ≤0.02). After matching, there were 120 ICI and 322 non-ICI patients. ICI patients had no differences (odds ratio: 95% CI) in presenting COVID-19 symptoms (0.69: 0.37-1.28), receipt of COVID-specific therapy (0.88: 0.54-1.41), 14-day (0.95: 0.56-1.61), or 28-day (0.79: 0.48-1.29) mortalities. However, ICI patients required less COVID-19-related hospitalization (0.37: 0.21-0.67) and oxygen therapy (0.51: 0.31-0.83) and developed fewer complications (0.57: 0.36-0.92). CONCLUSION In this propensity-score matched analysis, previous ICI therapy did not worsen and potentially improved COVID-19 outcomes in patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anahita Mostaghim
- Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, USA; Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Samuel Minkove
- Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, USA
| | - Juan Aguilar-Company
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Infectious Diseases, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Isabel Ruiz-Camps
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Infectious Diseases, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Simeon Eremiev-Eremiev
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Infectious Diseases, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gino M Dettorre
- Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
| | - Laura Fox
- Department of Hematology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carlo Tondini
- Oncology Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Joan Brunet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, University Hospital Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - MCarmen Carmona-García
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, University Hospital Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Medical Oncology Department, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Mark Bower
- Department of Oncology and National Centre for HIV Malignancy, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | - Thomas Newsom-Davis
- Department of Oncology and National Centre for HIV Malignancy, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | - Rachel Sharkey
- Department of Oncology and National Centre for HIV Malignancy, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | - Alessia Dalla Pria
- Department of Oncology and National Centre for HIV Malignancy, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | - Maura Rossi
- Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera "SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo", Alessandria, Italy
| | - Andrea Plaja
- Medical Oncology Department, B-ARGO Group, IGTP, Catalan Institute of Oncology-Badalona, Spain
| | - Ramon Salazar
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICO L'Hospitalet, Oncobell Program (IDIBELL), CIBERONC, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Sureda
- Haematology Department, ICO Hospitalet, Hospitalet de Llobregat, IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Aleix Prat
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain; Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Vasiliki Michalarea
- Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London, UK
| | - Mieke Van Hemelrijck
- Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London, UK; Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ailsa Sita-Lumsden
- Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London, UK
| | - Alexia Bertuzzi
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenza Rimassa
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini, Milan, Italy
| | - Sabrina Rossi
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianpiero Rizzo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Paolo Pedrazzoli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Therapy, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Alvin Jx Lee
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Cian Murphy
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | - Uma Mukherjee
- Medical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Fanny Pommeret
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Annabelle Stoclin
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Riccardo Bruna
- Division of Haematology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale and Ospedale Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Gianluca Gaidano
- Division of Haematology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale and Ospedale Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Francesca D'Avanzo
- Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Alessandra Gennari
- Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Janhavi Athale
- Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, USA
| | - Peter Eichacker
- Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, USA
| | - David J Pinato
- Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College of London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Parizad Torabi-Parizi
- Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center and National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Alessio Cortellini
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College of London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK; Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128, Roma, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Adhikary S, Pathak S, Palani V, Acar A, Banerjee A, Al-Dewik NI, Essa MM, Mohammed SGAA, Qoronfleh MW. Current Technologies and Future Perspectives in Immunotherapy towards a Clinical Oncology Approach. Biomedicines 2024; 12:217. [PMID: 38255322 PMCID: PMC10813720 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12010217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy is now established as a potent therapeutic paradigm engendering antitumor immune response against a wide range of malignancies and other diseases by modulating the immune system either through the stimulation or suppression of immune components such as CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, B cells, monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, and natural killer cells. By targeting several immune checkpoint inhibitors or blockers (e.g., PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2, CTLA-4, LAG3, and TIM-3) expressed on the surface of immune cells, several monoclonal antibodies and polyclonal antibodies have been developed and already translated clinically. In addition, natural killer cell-based, dendritic cell-based, and CAR T cell therapies have been also shown to be promising and effective immunotherapeutic approaches. In particular, CAR T cell therapy has benefited from advancements in CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing technology, allowing the generation of several modified CAR T cells with enhanced antitumor immunity. However, the emerging SARS-CoV-2 infection could hijack a patient's immune system by releasing pro-inflammatory interleukins and cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, and IL-10, and IFN-γ and TNF-α, respectively, which can further promote neutrophil extravasation and the vasodilation of blood vessels. Despite the significant development of advanced immunotherapeutic technologies, after a certain period of treatment, cancer relapses due to the development of resistance to immunotherapy. Resistance may be primary (where tumor cells do not respond to the treatment), or secondary or acquired immune resistance (where tumor cells develop resistance gradually to ICIs therapy). In this context, this review aims to address the existing immunotherapeutic technologies against cancer and the resistance mechanisms against immunotherapeutic drugs, and explain the impact of COVID-19 on cancer treatment. In addition, we will discuss what will be the future implementation of these strategies against cancer drug resistance. Finally, we will emphasize the practical steps to lay the groundwork for enlightened policy for intervention and resource allocation to care for cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Subhamay Adhikary
- Medical Biotechnology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education (CARE), Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute (CHRI), Chennai 603103, India
| | - Surajit Pathak
- Medical Biotechnology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education (CARE), Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute (CHRI), Chennai 603103, India
| | - Vignesh Palani
- Faculty of Medicine, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute (CHRI), Chennai 603103, India
| | - Ahmet Acar
- Department of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University, 06800 Ankara, Türkiye;
| | - Antara Banerjee
- Medical Biotechnology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education (CARE), Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute (CHRI), Chennai 603103, India
| | - Nader I. Al-Dewik
- Department of Pediatrics, Women’s Wellness and Research Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha 00974, Qatar;
| | - Musthafa Mohamed Essa
- College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat 123, Oman
| | | | - M. Walid Qoronfleh
- Research & Policy Division, Q3 Research Institute (QRI), Ypsilanti, MI 48917, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Anastasopoulou A, Diamantopoulos PT, Kouzis P, Saridaki M, Sideris K, Samarkos M, Gogas H. COVID-19 in Patients with Melanoma: A Single-Institution Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:96. [PMID: 38201522 PMCID: PMC10778439 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
We conducted a single-center, non-interventional retrospective study of melanoma patients with COVID-19 (1 March 2020 until 17 March 2023). The cohort was further divided into three groups according to the periods of SARS-CoV-2 variant dominance in Greece. We recorded demographics, comorbidities, vaccination data, cancer diagnosis/stage, types of systemic melanoma treatments, date of COVID-19 diagnosis and survival. We identified 121 patients. The vast majority (87.6%) had advanced disease (stages III or IV). A total of 80.1% of the patients were receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies, 92.5% had asymptomatic/mild COVID-19 and 7.4% had moderate/severe/critical disease, while 83.5% contracted COVID-19 during the third period of the pandemic. Sixteen patients (13.2%) were hospitalized for COVID-19 with a median length of stay of 12 days (range: 1-55 days). Advanced age, heart failure, number of comorbidities (≤1 vs. >1), vaccination status and the time period of the infection correlated with more severe COVID-19, whereas only heart failure and time period were independently correlated with severity. The 30-day mortality rate after COVID-19 was 4.2%. With a median follow-up of 340 days post-COVID-19, 17.4% of patients were deceased. In this cohort of melanoma patients with COVID-19, the 30-day mortality rate was low. There was no association between melanoma stage, treatment receipt and type of treatment with COVID-19 severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amalia Anastasopoulou
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (P.T.D.); (P.K.); (M.S.); (K.S.); (M.S.); (H.G.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Al-Rabi K, Al-Qadi F, Al-Ibraheem A, Halahleh K, Salah S, Ababneh H, Akkawi M, Sughayer M, Tafesh L, Abu Abed L, Ma'koseh M. The Impact COVID-19 Infection on Cancer Patients: A Tertiary Cancer Center Experience in Jordan. Cureus 2023; 15:e51310. [PMID: 38288187 PMCID: PMC10823193 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.51310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer patients are at higher risk of serious complications of COVID-19. Few studies evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on cancer patients in low- and middle-income countries. Our study aims to evaluate the outcomes of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients treated at our institution. Methods: Medical records of patients with a positive COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) between April 2020 and October 2020 were reviewed. Fisher's exact test and logistic regression analysis were employed to correlate various variables with mortality. Survival estimates were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS A total of 317 patients were included, with a median age was 55 years (range: 19-88). 82 (25.9%) had hematological neoplasms while the remainder had solid cancers. At the time of infection, 220 (69.4%) had active cancer, and 99 (31.2%) had received systemic anticancer treatment (SACT) within four weeks. Hospitalization was required for 101 (31.8%), 17 (5.3%) were admitted to the ICU and 50 (15.8%) died. Among patients with active cancer, SACT was delayed or discontinued in 140 (63.6%) patients. In the entire patient cohort, low albumin (p=<0.001) and leucocytosis (p=<0.001) correlated with mortality within six months of COVID-19 infection. The six-month mortality rate in patients with active cancer was significantly higher in patients with hypertension (p=0.024), no recent SACT (0.017), hematological cancer (p=0.029), low albumin (p=<0.001), leucocytosis (p=0.002) and lymphocyte count of less than 500/µL (p=0.004). Recent chemotherapy was associated with better 6-month survival rates (78.8% vs 89.9%, p=0.012) in patients with active cancer, patients with solid cancers (95.9% vs 82.2%, p=0.006) and was non-inferior in patient with hematological neoplasms (72% vs 65.4%, p=0.519). Conclusion: COVID-19 infection in our cancer patients was associated with significant morbidity and mortality and adversely affected their treatment. The decision to delay or discontinue SACT should be individualized, considering other risk factors for mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamal Al-Rabi
- Medical Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, JOR
- Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, JOR
| | - Fadwa Al-Qadi
- Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, JOR
| | | | | | - Samer Salah
- Medical Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, JOR
| | - Hazim Ababneh
- Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, JOR
| | | | - Maher Sughayer
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, JOR
| | - Lana Tafesh
- Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, JOR
| | - Layan Abu Abed
- Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, JOR
| | - Mohammad Ma'koseh
- Medical Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, JOR
- Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, JOR
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hardy N, Vegivinti CTR, Mehta M, Thurnham J, Mebane A, Pederson JM, Tarchand R, Shivakumar J, Olaniran P, Gadodia R, Ganguly A, Kelagere Y, Nallabolu RR, Gaddam M, Keesari PR, Pulakurthi YS, Reddy R, Kallmes K, Musunuru TN. Mortality of COVID-19 in patients with hematological malignancies versus solid tumors: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Med 2023; 23:1945-1959. [PMID: 36795239 PMCID: PMC9933827 DOI: 10.1007/s10238-023-01004-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
Cancer patients are more vulnerable to COVID-19 compared to the general population, but it remains unclear which types of cancer have the highest risk of COVID-19-related mortality. This study examines mortality rates for those with hematological malignancies (Hem) versus solid tumors (Tumor). PubMed and Embase were systematically searched for relevant articles using Nested Knowledge software (Nested Knowledge, St Paul, MN). Articles were eligible for inclusion if they reported mortality for Hem or Tumor patients with COVID-19. Articles were excluded if they were not published in English, non-clinical studies, had insufficient population/outcomes reporting, or were irrelevant. Baseline characteristics collected included age, sex, and comorbidities. Primary outcomes were all-cause and COVID-19-related in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included rates of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Effect sizes from each study were computed as logarithmically transformed odds ratios (ORs) with random-effects, Mantel-Haenszel weighting. The between-study variance component of random-effects models was computed using restricted effects maximum likelihood estimation, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) around pooled effect sizes were calculated using Hartung-Knapp adjustments. In total, 12,057 patients were included in the analysis, with 2,714 (22.5%) patients in the Hem group and 9,343 (77.5%) patients in the Tumor group. The overall unadjusted odds of all-cause mortality were 1.64 times higher in the Hem group compared to the Tumor group (95% CI: 1.30-2.09). This finding was consistent with multivariable models presented in moderate- and high-quality cohort studies, suggestive of a causal effect of cancer type on in-hospital mortality. Additionally, the Hem group had increased odds of COVID-19-related mortality compared to the Tumor group (OR = 1.86 [95% CI: 1.38-2.49]). There was no significant difference in odds of IMV or ICU admission between cancer groups (OR = 1.13 [95% CI: 0.64-2.00] and OR = 1.59 [95% CI: 0.95-2.66], respectively). Cancer is a serious comorbidity associated with severe outcomes in COVID-19 patients, with especially alarming mortality rates in patients with hematological malignancies, which are typically higher compared to patients with solid tumors. A meta-analysis of individual patient data is needed to better assess the impact of specific cancer types on patient outcomes and to identify optimal treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mansi Mehta
- Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | | | | | - John M Pederson
- Nested Knowledge, Inc, St Paul, MN, USA
- Superior Medical Experts, St. Paul, MN, USA
| | | | - Jeevan Shivakumar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Ritika Gadodia
- Medstar Washington Hospital Center/Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Arup Ganguly
- University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX, USA
| | - Yashaswini Kelagere
- Department of Pediatrics, Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | | | | - Praneeth R Keesari
- Kamineni Academy of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | | | - Rohit Reddy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India
| | | | - Tejo N Musunuru
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wu M, Liu S, Wang C, Wu Y, Liu J. Risk factors for mortality among lung cancer patients with covid-19 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0291178. [PMID: 37682957 PMCID: PMC10490932 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung cancer patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection experience high mortality rates. The study aims to determine the risk factors for mortality in lung cancer patients with COVID-19 infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS Followed the PRISMA reporting guidelines, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were systematically searched to February 20, 2023, for studies of lung cancer patients with COVID-19 infection. The main outcome of interest was the risk factor for mortality. We also compared the mortality rate of those patients among different continents. A pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI was presented as the result of this meta-analysis. RESULTS Meta-analysis of 33 studies involving 5018 patients showed that pooled mortality rate of lung cancer in COVID-19 patients was 0.31 (95% CI: 0.25-0.36). Subgroup analysis based on the continents showed significant difference of the mortality rate was observed between Asia and the rest of world (χ2 = 98.96, P < 0.01). Older age (SMD: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.09-0.40, P < 0.01), advanced lung cancer (RR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.04-1.26, P < 0.01), coexisting comorbidities such as hypertension (RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.01-1.35, P = 0.04) and cardiovascular disease (RR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.03-1.91, P = 0.03) were associated with higher risk of mortality rate in those patients. CONCLUSIONS Findings of this meta-analysis confirms an increased risk of mortality in lung cancer patients with COVID-19 infection, whose risk factors for these patients appear to be exacerbated by older age, advanced-stage lung cancer, and comorbidities such as hypertension and cardiovascular disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingyue Wu
- Information Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Siru Liu
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| | - Changyu Wang
- West China College of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yuxuan Wu
- Department of Medical Informatics, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jialin Liu
- Information Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Medical Informatics, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ding M, Xiang H, Ye J, Cheng Y, Liu Q, Xu L. Comparison of adverse effects of anti-tumor therapy for breast cancer shortly after COVID-19 diagnosis vs. the control period. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1203119. [PMID: 37671052 PMCID: PMC10475930 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1203119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background COVID-19 is an acute infectious disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. The best time to restart antitumor therapy in breast cancer patients after SARS-CoV-2 infection is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate treatment-related adverse events in breast cancer patients who received antitumor therapies within a short time after SARS-CoV-2 infection (observation) as well as before (control) and to provide safety data. Methods We conducted a self-controlled cohort study using the data from the Breast Disease Center of Peking University First Hospital. We identified patients who received antitumor therapy within 28 days after COVID-19 infection between December 20, 2022, and January 20, 2023. The primary outcome was treatment-related adverse events. McNemar's test was used to compare the incidence rate of adverse reactions between periods. Results We identified 183 patients with breast cancer, of whom 109 were infected with SARS-CoV-2 within 28 days before antitumor treatment and were included. In total, 28 patients (25.7%) received neoadjuvant therapy, 60 (55.0%) received adjuvant therapy, and 21 (19.3%) received advanced rescue therapy. None of patients required hospitalization for severe or critical COVID-19, but 15 patients (13.8%) still had sequelae of COVID-19 while receiving antitumor treatment. The most common adverse events were peripheral neuropathy (n = 32 [29.4%]), pain (n = 29 [26.6%]), fatigue (n = 28 [25.7%]), nausea (n = 23 [21.1%]), and neutropenia (n = 19 [17.4%]). There was no increased risk of overall treatment-related adverse events (n = 87 [79.8%] vs. n = 91 [83.5%]; p = 0.42) or serious adverse events (n = 13 [11.9%] vs. n = 12 [11.0%]; p = 1.00) from receiving antitumor therapy shortly after the diagnosis of COVID-19. We also found no increased risk in subgroup analyses, and no patients discontinued antitumor therapy due to adverse events. Conclusion Restarting antitumor therapy 2-4 weeks after having mild or moderate COVID-19 is a relatively safe strategy for breast cancer patients that does not increase the risk of treatment-related adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Qian Liu
- Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Moey MYY, Hennessy C, French B, Warner JL, Tucker MD, Hausrath DJ, Shah DP, DeCara JM, Bakouny Z, Labaki C, Choueiri TK, Dent S, Akhter N, Ismail-Khan R, Tachiki L, Slosky D, Polonsky TS, Awosika JA, Crago A, Wise-Draper T, Balanchivadze N, Hwang C, Fecher LA, Gomez CG, Hayes-Lattin B, Glover MJ, Shah SA, Gopalakrishnan D, Griffiths EA, Kwon DH, Koshkin VS, Mahmood S, Bashir B, Nonato T, Razavi P, McKay RR, Nagaraj G, Oligino E, Puc M, Tregubenko P, Wulff-Burchfield EM, Xie Z, Halfdanarson TR, Farmakiotis D, Klein EJ, Robilotti EV, Riely GJ, Durand JB, Hayek SS, Kondapalli L, Berg S, O'Connor TE, Bilen MA, Castellano C, Accordino MK, Sibel B, Weissmann LB, Jani C, Flora DB, Rudski L, Dutra MS, Nathaniel B, Ruíz-García E, Vilar-Compte D, Gupta S, Morgans A, Nohria A. COVID-19 severity and cardiovascular outcomes in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients with cancer and cardiovascular disease. Transl Oncol 2023; 34:101709. [PMID: 37302348 PMCID: PMC10235676 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Data regarding outcomes among patients with cancer and co-morbid cardiovascular disease (CVD)/cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) after SARS-CoV-2 infection are limited. Objectives To compare Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related complications among cancer patients with and without co-morbid CVD/CVRF. Methods Retrospective cohort study of patients with cancer and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2, reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry from 03/17/2020 to 12/31/2021. CVD/CVRF was defined as established CVD or no established CVD, male ≥ 55 or female ≥ 60 years, and one additional CVRF. The primary endpoint was an ordinal COVID-19 severity outcome including need for hospitalization, supplemental oxygen, intensive care unit (ICU), mechanical ventilation, ICU or mechanical ventilation plus vasopressors, and death. Secondary endpoints included incident adverse CV events. Ordinal logistic regression models estimated associations of CVD/CVRF with COVID-19 severity. Effect modification by recent cancer therapy was evaluated. Results Among 10,876 SARS-CoV-2 infected patients with cancer (median age 65 [IQR 54-74] years, 53% female, 52% White), 6253 patients (57%) had co-morbid CVD/CVRF. Co-morbid CVD/CVRF was associated with higher COVID-19 severity (adjusted OR: 1.25 [95% CI 1.11-1.40]). Adverse CV events were significantly higher in patients with CVD/CVRF (all p<0.001). CVD/CVRF was associated with worse COVID-19 severity in patients who had not received recent cancer therapy, but not in those undergoing active cancer therapy (OR 1.51 [95% CI 1.31-1.74] vs. OR 1.04 [95% CI 0.90-1.20], pinteraction <0.001). Conclusions Co-morbid CVD/CVRF is associated with higher COVID-19 severity among patients with cancer, particularly those not receiving active cancer therapy. While infrequent, COVID-19 related CV complications were higher in patients with comorbid CVD/CVRF. (COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium Registry [CCC19]; NCT04354701).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Y Y Moey
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Vidant Medical Center/East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States
| | - Cassandra Hennessy
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Benjamin French
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Jeremy L Warner
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States; Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Matthew D Tucker
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Daniel J Hausrath
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Dimpy P Shah
- Mays Cancer Center at UTHealth San Antonio MD Anderson, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Jeanne M DeCara
- Section of Cardiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Ziad Bakouny
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Chris Labaki
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | - Susan Dent
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Nausheen Akhter
- Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Roohi Ismail-Khan
- Cardio-Oncology Program, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine and Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Lisa Tachiki
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - David Slosky
- Cardio-Oncology Program, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Tamar S Polonsky
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Joy A Awosika
- University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| | - Audrey Crago
- University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| | | | - Nino Balanchivadze
- Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Clara Hwang
- Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Leslie A Fecher
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | | | - Brandon Hayes-Lattin
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute at Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Michael J Glover
- Stanford Cancer Institute at Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Sumit A Shah
- Stanford Cancer Institute at Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Dharmesh Gopalakrishnan
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Elizabeth A Griffiths
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Daniel H Kwon
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Vadim S Koshkin
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Sana Mahmood
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Babar Bashir
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Taylor Nonato
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Pedram Razavi
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Rana R McKay
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Gayathri Nagaraj
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, United States
| | - Eric Oligino
- Cardio-Oncology, Hartford HealthCare Cancer, Hartford, CT, United States
| | | | - Polina Tregubenko
- The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | | | - Zhuoer Xie
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | | | | | - Elizabeth J Klein
- Brown University and Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, RI, United States
| | | | - Gregory J Riely
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | | | - Salim S Hayek
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Lavanya Kondapalli
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Stephanie Berg
- Loyola University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
| | | | - Mehmet A Bilen
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Cecilia Castellano
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Melissa K Accordino
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center at Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Blau Sibel
- Northwest Medical Specialties, Tacoma, WA, United States
| | | | - Chinmay Jani
- Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | | | - Lawrence Rudski
- Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Miriam Santos Dutra
- Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Alicia Morgans
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.
| | - Anju Nohria
- Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Johansson AL, Skog A, Johannesen TB, Myklebust TÅ, Skovlund CW, Mørch LS, Friis S, Gamborg M, Kristiansen MF, Pettersson D, Ólafsdóttir EJ, Birgisson H, Palsson R, Eythorsson E, Irenaeus S, Lambe M, Ursin G. Were cancer patients worse off than the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic? A population-based study from Norway, Denmark and Iceland during the pre-vaccination era. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2023; 31:100680. [PMID: 37547277 PMCID: PMC10398597 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
Background In a population-based setting, we investigated the risks of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 and developing severe COVID-19 outcomes among cancer patients compared with the general population. Methods In nationwide cohorts, we identified all individuals in Norway, Denmark and Iceland who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 or had a severe COVID-19 outcome (hospitalisation, intensive care, and death) from March until December 2020, using data from national health registries. We estimated standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing cancer patients with the general population. Findings During the first wave of the pandemic, cancer patients in Norway and Denmark had higher risks of testing SARS-CoV-2 positive compared to the general population. Throughout 2020, recently treated cancer patients were more likely to test SARS-CoV-2 positive. In Iceland, cancer patients experienced no increased risk of testing positive. The risk of COVID-19-related hospitalisation was higher among cancer patients diagnosed within one year of hospitalisation (Norway: SIR = 2.43, 95% CI 1.89-3.09; Denmark: 2.23, 1.96-2.54) and within five years (Norway: 1.58, 1.35-1.83; Denmark: 1.54, 1.42-1.66). Risks were higher in recently treated cancer patients and in those diagnosed with haematologic malignancies, colorectal or lung cancer. Risks of COVID-19-related intensive care and death were higher among cancer patients. Interpretation Cancer patients were at increased risk of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 during the first pandemic wave when testing availability was limited, while relative risks of severe COVID-19 outcomes remained increased in cancer patients throughout 2020. Recent cancer treatment and haematologic malignancy were the strongest risk factors. Funding Nordic Cancer Union.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna L.V. Johansson
- Cancer Registry of Norway, P.O. Box 5313 Majorstuen, Oslo N-0304, Norway
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, P.O. Box 281, Stockholm SE-17177, Sweden
| | - Anna Skog
- Cancer Registry of Norway, P.O. Box 5313 Majorstuen, Oslo N-0304, Norway
| | | | - Tor Åge Myklebust
- Cancer Registry of Norway, P.O. Box 5313 Majorstuen, Oslo N-0304, Norway
- Department of Research and Innovation, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Charlotte Wessel Skovlund
- Cancer Surveillance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, Copenhagen DK-2100, Denmark
| | - Lina Steinrud Mørch
- Cancer Surveillance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, Copenhagen DK-2100, Denmark
| | - Søren Friis
- Cancer Surveillance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, Copenhagen DK-2100, Denmark
| | - Mads Gamborg
- Cancer Surveillance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, Copenhagen DK-2100, Denmark
| | - Marnar Fríðheim Kristiansen
- Center of Health Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands
- National Hospital of the Faroe Islands, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands
| | - David Pettersson
- National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm SE-106 30, Sweden
| | - Elínborg J. Ólafsdóttir
- ICS Research and Registration Center, Icelandic Cancer Society, P.O. Box 5420, 105 Reykjavík, Iceland
| | - Helgi Birgisson
- ICS Research and Registration Center, Icelandic Cancer Society, P.O. Box 5420, 105 Reykjavík, Iceland
| | - Runolfur Palsson
- Landspitali-The National University Hospital of Iceland, Saemundargata 2, 102 Reykjavík, Iceland
- University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Elias Eythorsson
- Landspitali-The National University Hospital of Iceland, Saemundargata 2, 102 Reykjavík, Iceland
| | - Sandra Irenaeus
- Regional Cancer Center Central Sweden, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala SE-751 85, Sweden
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Mats Lambe
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, P.O. Box 281, Stockholm SE-17177, Sweden
- Regional Cancer Center Central Sweden, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala SE-751 85, Sweden
| | - Giske Ursin
- Cancer Registry of Norway, P.O. Box 5313 Majorstuen, Oslo N-0304, Norway
- Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hall VG, Sim BZ, Lim C, Hocking C, Teo T, Runnegar N, Boan P, Heath CH, Rainey N, Lyle M, Steer C, Liu E, Doig C, Drummond K, Charles PG, See K, Lim LL, Shum O, Bak N, Mclachlan SA, Singh KP, Laundy N, Gallagher J, Stewart M, Saunders NR, Klimevski E, Demajo J, Reynolds G, Thursky KA, Worth LJ, Spelman T, Yong MK, Slavin MA, Teh BW. COVID-19 infection among patients with cancer in Australia from 2020 to 2022: a national multicentre cohort study. Lancet Reg Health West Pac 2023; 38:100824. [PMID: 37360862 PMCID: PMC10278158 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
Background The global COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately affected certain populations and its management differed between countries. This national study describes characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with cancer in Australia. Methods We performed a multicentre cohort study of patients with cancer and COVID-19 from March 2020 to April 2022. Data were analysed to determine varying characteristics between cancer types and changes in outcomes over time. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine risk factors associated with oxygen requirement. Findings 620 patients with cancer from 15 hospitals had confirmed COVID-19. There were 314/620 (50.6%) male patients, median age 63.5 years (IQR 50-72) and majority had solid organ tumours (392/620, 63.2%). The rate of COVID-19 vaccination (≥1 dose) was 73.4% (455/620). Time from symptom onset to diagnosis was median 1 day (IQR 0-3), patients with haematological malignancy had a longer duration of test positivity. Over the study period, there was a significant decline in COVID-19 severity. Risk factors associated with oxygen requirement included male sex (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.30-4.20, p = 0.004), age (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.06, p = 0.005); not receiving early outpatient therapy (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.41-5.50, p = 0.003). Diagnosis during the omicron wave was associated with lower odds of oxygen requirement (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.13-0.43, p < 0.0001). Interpretation Outcomes from COVID-19 in patients with cancer in Australia over the pandemic have improved, potentially related to changing viral strain and outpatient therapies. Funding This study was supported by research funding from MSD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria G. Hall
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Beatrice Z. Sim
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Chhay Lim
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Christopher Hocking
- Department of Oncology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Teddy Teo
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Naomi Runnegar
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Peter Boan
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Christopher H. Heath
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Microbiology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Natalie Rainey
- Department of Cancer Services, Cairns Hospital, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| | - Megan Lyle
- Department of Cancer Services, Cairns Hospital, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| | - Christopher Steer
- Border Medical Oncology, Albury Wodonga Regional Cancer Centre, Albury, NSW, Australia
| | - Eunice Liu
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Cassandra Doig
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kate Drummond
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Katharine See
- Department of Respiratory, Northern Hospital, Epping, VIC, Australia
| | - Lyn-Li Lim
- Monash University, Eastern Health Clinical School, Box Hill, VIC, Australia
| | - Omar Shum
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Narin Bak
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Sue-Anne Mclachlan
- Department of Oncology, St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Kasha P. Singh
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia
| | - Nicholas Laundy
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jenny Gallagher
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Marcelle Stewart
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Natalie R. Saunders
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Emily Klimevski
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jessica Demajo
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gemma Reynolds
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Karin A. Thursky
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Leon J. Worth
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Timothy Spelman
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Population Health, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Michelle K. Yong
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Monica A. Slavin
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Benjamin W. Teh
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tagliamento M, Gennari A, Lambertini M, Salazar R, Harbeck N, Del Mastro L, Aguilar-Company J, Bower M, Sharkey R, Dalla Pria A, Plaja A, Jackson A, Handford J, Sita-Lumsden A, Martinez-Vila C, Matas M, Miguel Rodriguez A, Vincenzi B, Tonini G, Bertuzzi A, Brunet J, Pedrazzoli P, D'Avanzo F, Biello F, Sinclair A, Lee AJ, Rossi S, Rizzo G, Mirallas O, Pimentel I, Iglesias M, Sanchez de Torre A, Guida A, Berardi R, Zambelli A, Tondini C, Filetti M, Mazzoni F, Mukherjee U, Diamantis N, Parisi A, Aujayeb A, Prat A, Libertini M, Grisanti S, Rossi M, Zoratto F, Generali D, Saura C, Lyman GH, Kuderer NM, Pinato DJ, Cortellini A. Pandemic Phase-Adjusted Analysis of COVID-19 Outcomes Reveals Reduced Intrinsic Vulnerability and Substantial Vaccine Protection From Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Patients With Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:2800-2814. [PMID: 36720089 PMCID: PMC10414724 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although representing the majority of newly diagnosed cancers, patients with breast cancer appear less vulnerable to COVID-19 mortality compared with other malignancies. In the absence of patients on active cancer therapy included in vaccination trials, a contemporary real-world evaluation of outcomes during the various pandemic phases, as well as of the impact of vaccination, is needed to better inform clinical practice. METHODS We compared COVID-19 morbidity and mortality among patients with breast cancer across prevaccination (February 27, 2020-November 30, 2020), Alpha-Delta (December 1, 2020-December 14, 2021), and Omicron (December 15, 2021-January 31, 2022) phases using OnCovid registry participants (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04393974). Twenty-eight-day case fatality rate (CFR28) and COVID-19 severity were compared in unvaccinated versus double-dosed/boosted patients (vaccinated) with inverse probability of treatment weighting models adjusted for country of origin, age, number of comorbidities, tumor stage, and receipt of systemic anticancer therapy within 1 month of COVID-19 diagnosis. RESULTS By the data lock of February 4, 2022, the registry counted 613 eligible patients with breast cancer: 60.1% (n = 312) hormone receptor-positive, 25.2% (n = 131) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, and 14.6% (n = 76) triple-negative. The majority (61%; n = 374) had localized/locally advanced disease. Median age was 62 years (interquartile range, 51-74 years). A total of 193 patients (31.5%) presented ≥ 2 comorbidities and 69% (n = 330) were never smokers. In total, 392 (63.9%), 164 (26.8%), and 57 (9.3%) were diagnosed during the prevaccination, Alpha-Delta, and Omicron phases, respectively. Analysis of CFR28 demonstrates comparable estimates of mortality across the three pandemic phases (13.9%, 12.2%, 5.3%, respectively; P = .182). Nevertheless, a significant improvement in outcome measures of COVID-19 severity across the three pandemic time periods was observed. Importantly, when reported separately, unvaccinated patients from the Alpha-Delta and Omicron phases achieved comparable outcomes to those from the prevaccination phase. Of 566 patients eligible for the vaccination analysis, 72 (12.7%) were fully vaccinated and 494 (87.3%) were unvaccinated. We confirmed with inverse probability of treatment weighting multivariable analysis and following a clustered robust correction for participating center that vaccinated patients achieved improved CFR28 (odds ratio [OR], 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.40), hospitalization (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.69), COVID-19 complications (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.45), and reduced requirement of COVID-19-specific therapy (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.63) and oxygen therapy (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.67) compared with unvaccinated controls. CONCLUSION Our findings highlight a consistent reduction of COVID-19 severity in patients with breast cancer during the Omicron outbreak in Europe. We also demonstrate that even in this population, a complete severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination course is a strong determinant of improved morbidity and mortality from COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Tagliamento
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Alessandra Gennari
- Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Medical Oncology Department, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Ramon Salazar
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICO L'Hospitalet, Oncobell Program (IDIBELL), CIBERONC, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center and Gynecological Cancer Center and CCC Munich, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Medical Oncology Department, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Juan Aguilar-Company
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
- Infectious Diseases, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mark Bower
- Department of Oncology and National Centre for HIV Malignancy, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Sharkey
- Department of Oncology and National Centre for HIV Malignancy, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alessia Dalla Pria
- Department of Oncology and National Centre for HIV Malignancy, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrea Plaja
- Medical Oncology Department, B-ARGO Group, IGTP, Catalan Institute of Oncology-Badalona, Badalona, Spain
| | | | - Jasmine Handford
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ailsa Sita-Lumsden
- Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Bruno Vincenzi
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tonini
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Alexia Bertuzzi
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Joan Brunet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, University Hospital Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - Paolo Pedrazzoli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Therapy, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesca D'Avanzo
- Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Federica Biello
- Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Alasdair Sinclair
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alvin J.X. Lee
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sabrina Rossi
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianpiero Rizzo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Oriol Mirallas
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Isabel Pimentel
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Annalisa Guida
- Department of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Terni, Italy
| | - Rossana Berardi
- Medical Oncology, AOU Ospedali Riuniti, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Carlo Tondini
- Oncology Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | | | - Uma Mukherjee
- Medical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alessandro Parisi
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Avinash Aujayeb
- Respiratory Department, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, United Kingdom
| | - Aleix Prat
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michela Libertini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Maura Rossi
- Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera “SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo,” Alessandria, Italy
| | | | - Daniele Generali
- Multidisciplinary Breast Pathology and Translational Research Unit, ASST Cremona, Cremona, Italy
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Cristina Saura
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), IOB-Quiron, UVic-UCC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gary H. Lyman
- Public Health Sciences Division and Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
- Divisions of Public Health Science and Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - David J. Pinato
- Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alessio Cortellini
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Terpos E, Musto P, Engelhardt M, Delforge M, Cook G, Gay F, van de Donk NWCJ, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Vangsted AJ, Driessen C, Schjesvold F, Cerchione C, Zweegman S, Hajek R, Moreau P, Einsele H, San-Miguel J, Boccadoro M, Dimopoulos MA, Sonneveld P, Ludwig H. Management of patients with multiple myeloma and COVID-19 in the post pandemic era: a consensus paper from the European Myeloma Network (EMN). Leukemia 2023:10.1038/s41375-023-01920-1. [PMID: 37142661 PMCID: PMC10157596 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-023-01920-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
In the post-pandemic COVID-19 period, human activities have returned to normal and COVID-19 cases are usually mild. However, patients with multiple myeloma (MM) present an increased risk for breakthrough infections and severe COVID-19 outcomes, including hospitalization and death. The European Myeloma Network has provided an expert consensus to guide patient management in this era. Vaccination with variant-specific booster vaccines, such as the bivalent vaccine for the ancestral Wuhan strain and the Omicron BA.4/5 strains, is essential as novel strains emerge and become dominant in the community. Boosters should be administered every 6-12 months after the last vaccine shot or documented COVID-19 infection (hybrid immunity). Booster shots seem to overcome the negative effect of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies on humoral responses; however, anti-BCMA treatment remains an adverse predictive factor for humoral immune response. Evaluation of the immune response after vaccination may identify a particularly vulnerable subset of patients who may need additional boosters, prophylactic therapies and prevention measures. Pre-exposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab is not effective against the new dominant variants and thus is no longer recommended. Oral antivirals (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir) and remdesivir are effective against Omicron subvariants BA.2.12.1, BA.4, BA.5, BQ.1.1 and/or XBB.1.5 and should be administered in MM patients at the time of a positive COVID-19 test or within 5 days post symptoms onset. Convalescent plasma seems to have low value in the post-pandemic era. Prevention measures during SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks, including mask wearing and avoiding crowded places, seem prudent to continue for MM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evangelos Terpos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
| | - Pellegrino Musto
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, "Aldo Moro" University School of Medicine, Bari, Italy
- Unit of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, AOUC Policlinico, Bari, Italy
| | - Monika Engelhardt
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Interdisciplinary Cancer Center and Comprehensive Cancer Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michel Delforge
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gordon Cook
- CRUK Clinical Trials Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trial Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Francesca Gay
- Division of Hematology, University of Turin, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Niels W C J van de Donk
- Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Annette Juul Vangsted
- Department of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christoph Driessen
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Fredrik Schjesvold
- Oslo Myeloma Center, Department of Hematology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- KG Jebsen Center for B-Cell Malignancies, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Claudio Cerchione
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Sonja Zweegman
- Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roman Hajek
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Philippe Moreau
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hotel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Hermann Einsele
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jesus San-Miguel
- Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, CCUN, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Mario Boccadoro
- Division of Hematology, University of Turin, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Meletios A Dimopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Pieter Sonneveld
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Heinz Ludwig
- Wilhelminen Cancer Research Institute, First Department of Medicine, Center for Oncology, Hematology, and Palliative Care, Clinic Ottakring, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Purshouse K, Thomson JP, Vallet M, Alexander L, Bonisteel I, Brennan M, Cameron DA, Figueroa JD, Furrie E, Haig P, Heck M, McCaughan H, Mitchell P, McVicars H, Primrose L, Silva I, Templeton K, Wilson N, Hall PS. The Scottish COVID Cancer Immunity Prevalence Study: A Longitudinal Study of SARS-CoV-2 Immune Response in Patients Receiving Anti-Cancer Treatment. Oncologist 2023; 28:e145-e155. [PMID: 36719033 PMCID: PMC10020811 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer and anti-cancer treatment (ACT) may be risk factors for severe SARS-CoV-2 infection and limited vaccine efficacy. Long-term longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate these risks. The Scottish COVID cancer immunity prevalence (SCCAMP) study characterizes the incidence and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination in patients with solid tumors undergoing ACT. This preliminary analysis includes 766 patients recruited since May 2020. METHODS Patients with solid-organ cancers attending secondary care for active ACT consented to the collection of routine electronic health record data and serial blood samples over 12 months. Blood samples were tested for total SARS-CoV-2 antibody. RESULTS A total of 766 participants were recruited between May 28, 2020 and October 31, 2021. Most received cytotoxic chemotherapy (79%). Among the participants, 48 (6.3%) were tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR. Infection rates were unaffected by ACT, largely aligning with the local population. Mortality proportion was not higher with a recent positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR (10.4% vs 10.6%). Multivariate analysis revealed lower infection rates in vaccinated patients regardless of chemotherapy (HR 0.307 [95% CI, 0.144-0.6548]) or immunotherapy (HR 0.314 [95% CI, 0.041-2.367]) treatment. A total of 96.3% of patients successfully raised SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after >2 vaccines. This was independent of the treatment type. CONCLUSION This is the largest on-going longitudinal real-world dataset of patients undergoing ACT during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. This preliminary analysis demonstrates that patients with solid tumors undergoing ACT have high protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection following COVID-19 vaccination. The SCCAMP study will evaluate long-term COVID-19 antibody trends, focusing on specific ACTs and patient subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Lorna Alexander
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Isaac Bonisteel
- The University of Edinburgh Medical School, The University of Edinburgh, Chancellor’s Building, Edinburgh BioQuarter, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Maree Brennan
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, UK
| | - David A Cameron
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, UK
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jonine D Figueroa
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
- Usher Institute, Centre for Population Health Sciences, Old Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Elizabeth Furrie
- Department of Immunology, Ninewells Hospital and Dundee Medical School, Dundee, UK
| | - Pamela Haig
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, UK
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Mattea Heck
- The University of Edinburgh Medical School, The University of Edinburgh, Chancellor’s Building, Edinburgh BioQuarter, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Hugh McCaughan
- Clinical Infection Research Group, Regional Infectious Diseases Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Paul Mitchell
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Heather McVicars
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Ines Silva
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, UK
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Kate Templeton
- Clinical Infection Research Group, Regional Infectious Diseases Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Natalie Wilson
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, UK
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Peter S Hall
- Corresponding author: Peter S. Hall, PhD, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dalamaga M, Nasiri-Ansari N, Spyrou N. Perspectives and Challenges of COVID-19 with Obesity-Related Cancers. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15061771. [PMID: 36980657 PMCID: PMC10046880 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
The emergence of COVID-19 has created an unprecedented threat worldwide, involving overwhelmed health-care systems in the majority of countries [...]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Dalamaga
- Department of Biological Chemistry, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 75 Mikras Asias, 11527 Athens, Greece
- Correspondence:
| | - Narjes Nasiri-Ansari
- Department of Biological Chemistry, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 75 Mikras Asias, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Spyrou
- Tisch Cancer Institute Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1190 One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jani CT, Schooley RT, Mckay RR, Lippman SM. Cancer, more than a “COVID-19 co-morbidity”. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1107384. [PMID: 36994197 PMCID: PMC10040761 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1107384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with cancer represent a particularly vulnerable population at risk of adverse outcomes related to COVID-19. Collectively, the initial studies, including patients with and without cancer, confirmed that patients with cancer had a higher risk of complications and death related to COVID-19. Subsequent studies on patients with COVID-19 and cancer investigated patient and disease-related factors associated with COVID-19 severity and morality. Multiple interconnected factors include demographics, comorbidities, cancer-associated variables, treatment side effects, and other parameters. However, there is a lack of clarity on the contributions of any one factor. In this commentary, we deconvolute the data of specific risk factors associated with worse outcomes due to COVID-19 in cancer patients and focus on understanding the recommended guidelines to mitigate COVID-19 risk in this vulnerable population. In the first section, we highlight the key parameters, including age and race, cancer status, type of malignancy, cancer therapy, smoking status and comorbidities that impact outcomes for cancer patients with COVID-19. Next, we discuss efforts made at the patient, health system, and population levels to mitigate the effects of the ongoing outbreak for patients with cancer, including (1) screening, barrier and isolation strategies (2), Masking/PPE (3), vaccination, and (4) systemic therapies (e.g., evusheld) to prevent disease onset in patients. In the last section, we discuss optimal treatment strategies for COVID-19, including additional therapies for patients with COVID-19 and cancer. Overall, this commentary focuses on articles with high yield and impact on understanding the evolving evidence of risk factors and management guidelines in detail. We also emphasize the ongoing collaboration between clinicians, researchers, health system administrators and policymakers and how its role will be important in optimizing care delivery strategies for patients with cancer. Creative patient-centered solutions will be critical in the coming years, post the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chinmay T. Jani
- Department of Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, MA, United States
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Robert T. Schooley
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Rana R. Mckay
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
- *Correspondence: Rana R. Mckay,
| | - Scott M. Lippman
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tanvetyanon T, Chen DT, Gray JE. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Frontline Pembrolizumab-Based Treatment for Advanced Lung Cancer. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12041611. [PMID: 36836146 PMCID: PMC9960275 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pembrolizumab monotherapy or pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy has become an important frontline treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To date, it remains unclear how the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic impacted the treatment outcome. METHODS A quasi-experimental study was conducted based on a real-world database, comparing pandemic with pre-pandemic patient cohorts. The pandemic cohort consisted of patients who initiated treatment from March to July 2020, with follow-up through March 2021. The pre-pandemic cohort consisted of those initiating treatment between March and July 2019.The outcome was overall real-world survival. Multivariable Cox-proportional hazard models were constructed. RESULTS Analyses included data from 2090 patients: 998 in the pandemic cohort and 1092 in the pre-pandemic cohort. Baseline characteristics were comparable, with 33% of patients having PD-L1 expression level ≥50% and 29% of patients receiving pembrolizumab monotherapy. Among those treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy (N = 613), there was a differential impact of the pandemic on survival by PD-L1 expression levels (p-interaction = 0.02). For those with PD-L1 level < 50%, survival was better in the pandemic cohort than the pre-pandemic cohort: hazard ratio (HR) 0.64 (95% CI: 0.43-0.97, p = 0.03). However, for those with PD-L1 level ≥ 50%, survival was not better in the pandemic cohort: HR 1.17 (95% CI: 0.85-1.61, p = 0.34). We found no statistically significant impact of the pandemic on survival among patients treated with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with an increase in survival among patients with lower PD-L1 expression who were treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy. This finding suggests an increased efficacy of immunotherapy due to viral exposure in this population.
Collapse
|
18
|
Han T, Chen L, Gu J, Wu S, Maihemuti M, Yang J, Wang H, Wu J, Zhang Y, Cong Y, Wang J, Chen T. Patients with advanced pancreatic and biliary cancer appear vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant: An observational study during the COVID-19 outbreak in Shanghai. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1115293. [PMID: 37035158 PMCID: PMC10073743 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1115293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has spread rapidly across the globe. Cancer patients have a higher risk of severe infections and associated mortality than the general population. However, the lethal effect of Omicron-variant affection on advanced pancreatic and biliary cancer patients is still not clear. Herein, we designed an observational study to shed light on the influence of the Omicron variant on this so-called "King of Cancer" and improve management of these patients with COVID-19 in the future. Methods Omicron-infected patients with advanced pancreatic and biliary cancer were enrolled from 15 April to 31 May 2022. Four groups were set up in this study: Group 1, Omicron-infected cancer patients (N = 4); Group 2, non-infected cancer patients (N = 4); Group 3, infected non-cancer-afflicted subjects (N = 4); Group 4, non-infected non-cancer-afflicted subjects (N = 4). On Days 0, 7, and 14 after infection, the blood samples were collected dynamically from all subjects. The primary endpoints were disease severity and survival. Results At the endpoint of this observational study, Patient Nos. 2, 3, and 4 died separately on Days 11, 25, and 13 after viral infection. All of them had advanced cancer, with a death rate of up to 75%. Group 1 presented an overall T-cell exhaustion status compared with other groups. Group 1 had obviously lower T-cell populations and higher B-cell percentages and CD4+T/CD8+T ratios (P <0.05). Time-course cytokine monitoring results showed that IL-1β was significantly decreased in Group 1 (P <0.05) and generally kept at a low level without obvious fluctuation. IL-6 was markedly increased in infected cancer patients (P <0.01) but remained at a low level and had no apparent change during the whole infection process in non-cancer-afflicted subjects. Furthermore, several inflammatory parameter indexes indicated a tight association of Omicron infection with the disease course and prognosis of Omicron-infected cancer patients. Conclusions Advanced pancreatic and biliary cancer patients with Omicron infection have severe symptoms and poor outcomes. More attention, protective measures, and routine healthcare services should be recommended to these vulnerable populations in clinical practice during the pandemic in the foreseeable future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Han
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Lujun Chen
- The General Hospital of Northern Theater Command Training Base for Graduate, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Jia Gu
- Department of Otolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Shen Wu
- Department of Oncology, Seventh People’s Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Maiweilan Maihemuti
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Jue Yang
- Department of Oncology, Seventh People’s Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Hao Wang
- Department of Oncology, Seventh People’s Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun Wu
- The General Hospital of Northern Theater Command Training Base for Graduate, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yue Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Seventh People’s Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yun Cong
- Department of Oncology, Seventh People’s Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiening Wang
- Department of Oncology, Seventh People’s Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Tingsong Chen, ; Jiening Wang,
| | - Tingsong Chen
- Department of Oncology, Seventh People’s Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Tingsong Chen, ; Jiening Wang,
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wang L, Wang Y, Cheng X, Li X, Li J. Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on lung cancer patients: A meta-analysis. Transl Oncol 2023; 28:101605. [PMID: 36568513 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2022.101605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses a great challenge to the treatment of lung cancer patients. Materials and methods The PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies published before March 15, 2022, and Stata 14.0 software was used to perform a meta-analysis with a random-effects model. The odds ratio (OR) along with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was reported. Results Our meta-analysis included 80 articles with 318,352 patients involved. The proportion of lung cancer patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was 2.4% (95% CI: 0.02-0.03) prior to the Omicron variant outbreak. Among COVID-19 patients, those with lung cancer showed a higher mortality rate than those with other types of malignant solid tumors (OR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.61-2.06) and non-cancer patients (OR = 4.67, 95% CI: 3.61-6.05); however, no significant difference was observed in the mortality rate between patients with lung cancer and those with hematologic malignancies (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.85-1.33). SARS-CoV-2 infection significantly increased the mortality rate in lung cancer patients (OR = 8.94, 95% CI: 6.50-12.31). By contrast, the all-cause mortality rate in lung cancer patients (OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.69-1.57) and the proportion of patients diagnosed with advanced lung cancer (OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.85-1.27) did not significantly change before and after the pandemic. Conclusions More attention should be paid on improving the health of lung cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
|
20
|
Oldani S, Petrelli F, Dognini G, Borgonovo K, Parati MC, Ghilardi M, Dottorini L, Cabiddu M, Luciani A. COVID-19 and Lung Cancer Survival: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14225706. [PMID: 36428798 PMCID: PMC9688481 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14225706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The outbreak of COVID-19 poses an unprecedented challenge to global public health. Patients with cancer are at a higher risk during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Patients with lung cancer and COVID-19 were compared to those without cancer and those with other malignancies for the main outcome of this study. The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in susceptibility, disease severity, and mortality between lung cancer patients and the general population. Methods: Using PRISMA reporting guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature. The Cochrane Library database, PubMed, EMBASE, and PubMed Central were comprehensively searched for published papers until 31 May 2022. A pooled risk ratio (OR) with 95% CI was presented as the result of this meta-analysis. Results: We included 29 studies involved 21,257 patients with lung cancer and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Analysis data showed that mortality in patients with lung cancer was significantly higher than that in patients without cancer (HR = 2.00 [95%CI 1.52, 2.63], p < 0.01) or with other malignancies (HR = 1.91 [95%CI 1.53, 2.39], p < 0.01). In addition, we also observed a higher risk of severe infection in terms of life-threatening or required ICU admission/mechanical ventilation for lung cancer patients (HR = 1.47 [95%CI 1.06, 2.03], p = 0.02) than for patients with no cancer or other malignancies. Regarding lung cancer as a risk factor for acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection, we could not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio [HR] =2.73 [95%CI 0.84, 8.94], p = 0.1). Conclusion: Lung cancer represents an important comorbidity and modifies COVID-19 prognosis in terms of disease severity and mortality. More patients experience severe or even fatal events. Considering their inherent fragility, patients with lung cancer, and generally all oncological populations, should be treated more carefully during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fausto Petrelli
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-036-342-4420; Fax: +39-036-342-4380
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lee LYW, Ionescu MC, Starkey T, Little M, Tilby M, Tripathy AR, Mckenzie HS, Al-Hajji Y, Appanna N, Barnard M, Benny L, Burnett A, Cattell EL, Clark JJ, Khan S, Ghafoor Q, Panneerselvam H, Illsley G, Harper-Wynne C, Hattersley RJ, Lee AJ, Lomas O, Liu JK, McCauley A, Pang M, Pascoe JS, Platt JR, Patel G, Patel V, Potter VA, Randle A, Rigg AS, Robinson TM, Roques TW, Roux RL, Rozmanowski S, Taylor H, Tuthill MH, Watts I, Williams S, Beggs A, Iveson T, Lee SM, Middleton G, Middleton M, Protheroe A, Fittall MW, Fowler T, Johnson P. COVID-19: Third dose booster vaccine effectiveness against breakthrough coronavirus infection, hospitalisations and death in patients with cancer: A population-based study. Eur J Cancer 2022; 175:1-10. [PMID: 36084618 PMCID: PMC9276646 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.06.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE People living with cancer and haematological malignancies are at an increased risk of hospitalisation and death following infection with acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Coronavirus third dose vaccine boosters are proposed to boost waning immune responses in immunocompromised individuals and increase coronavirus protection; however, their effectiveness has not yet been systematically evaluated. METHODS This study is a population-scale real-world evaluation of the United Kingdom's third dose vaccine booster programme for cancer patients from 8th December 2020 to 7th December 2021. The cancer cohort comprises individuals from Public Health England's national cancer dataset, excluding individuals less than 18 years. A test-negative case-control design was used to assess the third dose booster vaccine effectiveness. Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to compare risk in the cancer cohort relative to the general population. RESULTS The cancer cohort comprised of 2,258,553 tests from 361,098 individuals. Third dose boosters were evaluated by reference to 87,039,743 polymerase chain reaction coronavirus tests. Vaccine effectiveness against breakthrough infections, symptomatic infections, coronavirus hospitalisation and death in cancer patients were 59.1%, 62.8%, 80.5% and 94.5%, respectively. Lower vaccine effectiveness was associated with a cancer diagnosis within 12 months, lymphoma, recent systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) or radiotherapy. Patients with lymphoma had low levels of protection from symptomatic disease. In spite of third dose boosters, following multivariable adjustment, individuals with cancer remain at an increased risk of coronavirus hospitalisation and death compared to the population control (OR 3.38, 3.01, respectively. p < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS Third dose boosters are effective for most individuals with cancer, increasing protection from coronavirus. However, their effectiveness is heterogenous and lower than the general population. Many patients with cancer will remain at the increased risk of coronavirus infections even after 3 doses. In the case of patients with lymphoma, there is a particularly strong disparity of vaccine effectiveness against breakthrough infection and severe disease. Breakthrough infections will disrupt cancer care and treatment with potentially adverse consequences on survival outcomes. The data support the role of vaccine boosters in preventing severe disease, and further pharmacological intervention to prevent transmission and aid viral clearance to limit the disruption of cancer care as the delivery of care continues to evolve during the coronavirus pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lennard Y W Lee
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham; Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham.
| | | | - Thomas Starkey
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham
| | - Martin Little
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Michael Tilby
- Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Arvind R Tripathy
- Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Hayley S Mckenzie
- Oncology Department, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Emma L Cattell
- Department of Cancer, Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
| | - James J Clark
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London
| | - Sam Khan
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester
| | - Qamar Ghafoor
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | - Alvin Jx Lee
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London; University College London Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - Oliver Lomas
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Justin Kh Liu
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds
| | | | | | - Jennifer S Pascoe
- Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
| | - James R Platt
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds
| | - Grisma Patel
- Cancer Division, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London
| | | | - Vanessa A Potter
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire
| | | | - Anne S Rigg
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - Tom W Roques
- Cancer Services, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - René L Roux
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | - Mark H Tuthill
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - Sarah Williams
- Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Andrew Beggs
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham
| | - Tim Iveson
- Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton
| | - Siow M Lee
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London; University College London Hospitals NHS Trust; CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London
| | - Gary Middleton
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham; Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - Andrew Protheroe
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | - Peter Johnson
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire; Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Al Hajji Y, Taylor H, Starkey T, Lee LYW, Tilby M. Antibody response to a third booster dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in adults with haematological and solid cancer: a systematic review. Br J Cancer 2022. [PMID: 36224402 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01951-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients living with cancer are at a significantly increased risk of morbidity and mortality after infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). This systematic review aims to investigate the current available evidence about the immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccines in patients living with cancer. METHODS A systematic search was undertaken for studies published until March 1, 2022. A systematic narrative review was undertaken to include all studies that evaluated the efficacy of booster vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with cancer. RESULTS Fifteen studies encompassing 1205 patients with cancer were included. We found that a booster vaccine dose induced a higher response in patients with solid cancer as compared to haematological malignancies. Recent systemic anticancer therapy does not appear to affect seroconversion in solid organ malignancies, however, there is an association between B-cell depleting therapies and poor seroconversion in haematological patients. CONCLUSIONS Third booster vaccination induces an improved antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 in adults with haematological and solid cancer, relative to patients who only receive two doses. Access to vaccination boosters should be made available to patients at risk of poor immunological responses, and the provision of fourth doses may be of benefit to this vulnerable population. REGISTRATION PROSPERO number CRD42021270420.
Collapse
|
23
|
Mavragani A, Patel H, Bakoyannis G, Haggstrom DA, Mohanty S, Dixon BE. COVID-19 Diagnosis and Risk of Death Among Adults With Cancer in Indiana: Retrospective Cohort Study. JMIR Cancer 2022; 8:e35310. [PMID: 36201388 PMCID: PMC9555821 DOI: 10.2196/35310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior studies, generally conducted at single centers with small sample sizes, found that individuals with cancer experience more severe outcomes due to COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although early examinations revealed greater risk of severe outcomes for patients with cancer, the magnitude of the increased risk remains unclear. Furthermore, prior studies were not typically performed using population-level data, especially those in the United States. Given robust prevention measures (eg, vaccines) are available for populations, examining the increased risk of patients with cancer due to SARS-CoV-2 infection using robust population-level analyses of electronic medical records is warranted. OBJECTIVE The aim of this paper is to evaluate the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and all-cause mortality among recently diagnosed adults with cancer. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of newly diagnosed adults with cancer between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020, using electronic health records linked to a statewide SARS-CoV-2 testing database. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. We used the Kaplan-Meier estimator to estimate survival during the COVID-19 period (January 15, 2020, to December 31, 2020). We further modeled SARS-CoV-2 infection as a time-dependent exposure (immortal time bias) in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for clinical and demographic variables to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) among newly diagnosed adults with cancer. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using the above methods among individuals with cancer-staging information. RESULTS During the study period, 41,924 adults were identified with newly diagnosed cancer, of which 2894 (6.9%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. The population consisted of White (n=32,867, 78.4%), Black (n=2671, 6.4%), Hispanic (n=832, 2.0%), and other (n=5554, 13.2%) racial backgrounds, with both male (n=21,354, 50.9%) and female (n=20,570, 49.1%) individuals. In the COVID-19 period analysis, after adjusting for age, sex, race or ethnicity, comorbidities, cancer type, and region, the risk of death increased by 91% (adjusted HR 1.91; 95% CI 1.76-2.09) compared to the pre-COVID-19 period (January 1, 2019, to January 14, 2020) after adjusting for other covariates. In the adjusted time-dependent analysis, SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with an increase in all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 6.91; 95% CI 6.06-7.89). Mortality increased 2.5 times among adults aged 65 years and older (adjusted HR 2.74; 95% CI 2.26-3.31) compared to adults 18-44 years old, among male (adjusted HR 1.23; 95% CI 1.14-1.32) compared to female individuals, and those with ≥2 chronic conditions (adjusted HR 2.12; 95% CI 1.94-2.31) compared to those with no comorbidities. Risk of mortality was 9% higher in the rural population (adjusted HR 1.09; 95% CI 1.01-1.18) compared to adult urban residents. CONCLUSIONS The findings highlight increased risk of death is associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients with a recent diagnosis of cancer. Elevated risk underscores the importance of adhering to social distancing, mask adherence, vaccination, and regular testing among the adult cancer population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hetvee Patel
- Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Giorgos Bakoyannis
- Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - David A Haggstrom
- Center for Health Information and Communication, Health Services Research & Development Service, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Veterans Health Administration, Indianapolis, IN, United States.,Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.,Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Sanjay Mohanty
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Brian E Dixon
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, United States.,Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States.,Center for Health Information and Communication, Health Services Research & Development Service, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Veterans Health Administration, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Alhumaid S, Al Mutair A, Busubaih JS, Al Dossary N, Alsuliman M, Baltyour SA, Alissa I, Al Hassar HI, Al Aithan NA, Albassri HA, AlOmran SA, ALGhazal RM, Busbaih A, Alsalem NA, Alagnam W, Alyousef MY, Alseffay AU, Al Aish HA, Aldiaram A, Al Eissa HA, Alhumaid MA, Bukhamseen AN, Al Mutared KM, Aljwisim AH, Twibah AM, AlSaeed MM, Alkhalaf HA, ALShakhs FM, Koritala T, Al-Tawfiq JA, Dhama K, Rabaan AA, Al-Omari A. Colorectal cancer in patients with SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Agent Cancer 2022; 17:49. [PMID: 36096812 PMCID: PMC9466313 DOI: 10.1186/s13027-022-00459-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) are more likely to develop severe course of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and experience increased risk of mortality compared to SARS-CoV-2 patients without CRC. Objectives To estimate the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in CRC patients and analyse the demographic parameters, clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in CRC patients with COVID-19 illness. Methods For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched Proquest, Medline, Embase, Pubmed, CINAHL, Wiley online library, Scopus and Nature for studies on the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in CRC patients, published from December 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021, with English language restriction. Effect sizes of prevalence were pooled with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Sub-group analyses were performed to minimize heterogeneity. Binary logistic regression model was used to explore the effect of various demographic and clinical characteristics on patient’s final treatment outcome (survival or death). Results Of the 472 papers that were identified, 69 articles were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis (41 cohort, 16 case-report, 9 case-series, 2 cross-sectional, and 1 case-control studies). Studies involving 3362 CRC patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 (all patients were adults) were analyzed. The overall pooled proportions of CRC patients who had laboratory-confirmed community-acquired and hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infections were 8.1% (95% CI 6.1 to 10.1, n = 1308, 24 studies, I2 98%, p = 0.66), and 1.5% (95% CI 1.1 to 1.9, n = 472, 27 studies, I2 94%, p < 0.01). The median patient age ranged from 51.6 years to 80 years across studies. The majority of the patients were male (n = 2243, 66.7%) and belonged to White (Caucasian) (n = 262, 7.8%), Hispanic (n = 156, 4.6%) and Asian (n = 153, 4.4%) ethnicity. The main source of SARS-CoV-2 infection in CRC patients was community-acquired (n = 2882, 85.7%; p = 0.014). Most of those SARS-CoV-2 patients had stage III CRC (n = 725, 21.6%; p = 0.036) and were treated mainly with surgical resections (n = 304, 9%) and chemotherapies (n = 187, 5.6%), p = 0.008. The odd ratios of death were significantly high in patients with old age (≥ 60 years) (OR 1.96, 95% CI 0.94–0.96; p < 0.001), male gender (OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.41–0.47; p < 0.001) CRC stage III (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.02–1.05; p = 0.041), CRC stage IV (OR 1.69, 95% CI 0.17–1.2; p = 0.009), recent active treatment with chemotherapies (OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.5–0.66; p = 0.023) or surgical resections (OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.8–0.73; p = 0.016) and admission to ICU (OR 1.88, 95% CI 0.85–1.12; p < 0.001) compared to those who survived. Conclusion SARS-CoV-2 infection in CRC patient is not uncommon and results in a mortality rate of 26.2%. Key determinants that lead to increased mortality in CRC patients infected with COVID-19 include older age (≥ 60 years old); male gender; Asian and Hispanic ethnicity; if SARS-CoV-2 was acquired from hospital source; advanced CRC (stage III and IV); if patient received chemotherapies or surgical treatment; and if patient was admitted to ICU, ventilated or experienced ARDS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saad Alhumaid
- Administration of Pharmaceutical Care, Al-Ahsa Health Cluster, Ministry of Health, Rashdiah Street, P. O. Box 12944, Alahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Abbas Al Mutair
- Research Center, Almoosa Specialist Hospital, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.,College of Nursing, Princess Norah Bint Abdul Rahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,School of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Jawad S Busubaih
- Gastroenterology Department, King Fahad Hofuf Hospital, Ministry of Health, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nourah Al Dossary
- General Surgery Department, Alomran General Hospital, Alahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Murtadha Alsuliman
- Department of Pharmacy, Hereditary Blood Diseases Centre, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sarah A Baltyour
- Infection Prevention and Control Department, Alomran General Hospital, Alahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ibrahim Alissa
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, Prince Sultan Cardiac Centre, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Noor A Al Aithan
- Intensive Care Unit, Omran General Hospital, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hani A Albassri
- Pharmacy Department, Prince Saud Bin Jalawi Hospital, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Suliman A AlOmran
- Pharmacy Department, King Faisal General Hospital, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Raed M ALGhazal
- Department of Gastroenterology, King Fahad Hofuf Hospital, Ministry of Health, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Busbaih
- Critical Care Medicine/Gastroenterology Department, King Fahad Hofuf Hospital, Ministry of Health, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nasser A Alsalem
- Department of Critical Care, King Fahad Hofuf Hospital, Ministry of Health, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Waseem Alagnam
- Department of Critical Care, King Fahad Hofuf Hospital, Ministry of Health, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed Y Alyousef
- Administration of Academic Affairs and Research, Ministry of Health, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | | | | | - Ali Aldiaram
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, Prince Sultan Cardiac Centre, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hisham A Al Eissa
- Medical Services Department, King Fahad Hofuf Hospital, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Ali N Bukhamseen
- Pharmacy Department, Maternity and Children Hospital, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Koblan M Al Mutared
- Administration of Pharmaceutical Care, Ministry of Health, Najran, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah H Aljwisim
- Administration of Compliance, Al-Ahsa Health Affairs, Ministry of Health, Al‑Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah M Twibah
- Administration of Compliance, Al-Ahsa Health Affairs, Ministry of Health, Al‑Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Meteab M AlSaeed
- Regional Medical Supply, Al-Ahsa Health Cluster, Ministry of Health, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hussien A Alkhalaf
- Pharmacy Department, Al Jaber Hospital for Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat, Ministry of Health, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fatemah M ALShakhs
- Respiratory Therapy Department, Prince Saud Bin Jalawi Hospital, Ministry of Health, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Thoyaja Koritala
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System, Mankato, MN, USA
| | - Jaffar A Al-Tawfiq
- Infectious Disease Unit, Specialty Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.,Infectious Disease Division, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.,Infectious Disease Division, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kuldeep Dhama
- Division of Pathology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Uttar Pradesh, Izatnagar, Bareilly, 243122, India
| | - Ali A Rabaan
- Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.,College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, 11533, Saudi Arabia.,Department of Public Health and Nutrition, The University of Haripur, Haripur, 22610, Pakistan
| | - Awad Al-Omari
- College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Research Center, Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Medical Group, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mussetti A, Peric Z, Figueroa C. COVID19 in hematological patients and telemedicine: lessons learned across Europe and the US. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2022; 35:295-301. [PMID: 35849519 DOI: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To describe the state-of-the-art of telemedicine in hematology through the description of most relevant studies published in the pre-COVID19 and during the COVID19 era. RECENT FINDINGS Telemedicine has recently gained momentum in hematology due to the COVID19 pandemic. Due to a necessary improvement of domiciliary follow-up of patients during the pandemic and an increase in technologies able to offer telemedicine, the number of studies has increased in the last 2 years. Telemedicine showed the potential to improve the monitoring of both benign and malignant hematological diseases. Patients affected by thalassemias, hemophilias and/or myeloproliferative diseases were monitored successfully with telemedicine platform. For higher-risk patients such as high-dose chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation, better platforms are needed (e.g. use of wearable devices systems). Also, telemedicine showed to be useful for the follow-up of hematological patients with COVID19. SUMMARY Despite the clear potential advantages of telemedicine for the follow-up of hematological patients, more evidence is required before adopting this approach in larger cohorts of patients. Larger- and higher-quality studies are highly needed in this setting.
Collapse
|
26
|
Calò F, Onorato L, Pisaturo M, Pinto A, Alessio L, Monari C, Minichini C, Arcamone M, Fraia AD, Atripaldi L, Tiberio C, Coppola N. Fatal Outcome of COVID-19 Relapse in a Fully Vaccinated Patient with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Receiving Maintenance Therapy with the Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody Obinutuzumab: A Case Report. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:1021. [PMID: 35891185 PMCID: PMC9323164 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10071021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Few data are available regarding the effectiveness of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in immunocompromised patients. Vaccination may have a suboptimal efficacy in this population, in particular if patients are exposed to anti-B-cell therapy. We report the virological and clinical characteristics of a patient with follicle center lymphoma under bimonthly maintenance therapy with obinutuzumab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. Despite three doses of BNT162b2 vaccine, the patient was infected by the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. After an initial period of clinical and molecular remission due to early therapy with sotrovimab, the patient experienced a fatal relapse sustained by the same viral strain.
Collapse
|
27
|
Goldman JD, Gonzalez MA, Rüthrich MM, Sharon E, von Lilienfeld-Toal M. COVID-19 and Cancer: Special Considerations for Patients Receiving Immunotherapy and Immunosuppressive Cancer Therapies. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2022; 42:1-13. [PMID: 35658503 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_359656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Patients with cancer generally have a higher risk of adverse outcomes from COVID-19, with higher age, male sex, poor performance status, cancer type, and uncontrolled malignant disease as the main risk factors. However, the influence of specific cancer therapies varies and raises concerns during the pandemic. In patients undergoing cancer immunotherapy or other immunosuppressive cancer treatments, we summarize the evidence on outcomes from COVID-19; address the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination; and review COVID-19 antiviral therapeutics for the patient with cancer. Despite higher mortality for patients with cancer, treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors does not seem to increase mortality risk based on observational evidence. Inhibitory therapies directed toward B-cell lineages, including monoclonal antibodies against CD20 and CAR T-cell therapies, are associated with poor outcomes in COVID-19; however, the data are sparse. Regarding vaccination in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors, clinical efficacy comparable to that in the general population can be expected. In patients undergoing B-cell-depleting therapy, immunogenicity and clinical efficacy are curtailed, but vaccination is not futile, which is thought to be due to the cellular response. Vaccine reactogenicity and toxicity in all groups of patients with cancer are comparable to that of the general population. Preexposure prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies directed against the viral spike may provide passive immunity for those not likely to mount an adequate vaccine response. If infected, prompt treatment with monoclonal antibodies or oral small molecule antivirals is beneficial, though with oral antiviral therapies, care must be taken to avoid drug interactions in patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason D Goldman
- Swedish Center for Research and Innovation, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA.,Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.,Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Michael A Gonzalez
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.,Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Maria Madeleine Rüthrich
- Klinik für Notfallmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.,Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology, Hans-Knöll Institute, Jena, Germany
| | - Elad Sharon
- Division of Cancer Treatment & Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Marie von Lilienfeld-Toal
- Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology, Hans-Knöll Institute, Jena, Germany.,Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Abteilung für Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jiang J, Zhong W, Huang W, Gao Y, He Y, Li X, Liu Z, Zhou H, Fu Y, Liu R, Zhang W. Development and Validation of a Predictive Nomogram with Age and Laboratory Findings for Severe COVID-19 in Hunan Province, China. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2022; 18:579-591. [PMID: 35607424 PMCID: PMC9123913 DOI: 10.2147/tcrm.s361936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To identify more objectively predictive factors of severe outcome among patients hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Patients and Methods A retrospective cohort of 479 hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in Hunan Province was selected. The prognostic effects of factors such as age and laboratory indicators were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. A prognostic nomogram model was established to predict the progression of patients with COVID-19. Results A total of 524 patients in Hunan province with COVID-19 from December 2019 to October 2020 were retrospectively recruited. Among them, 479 eligible patients were randomly assigned into the training cohort (n = 383) and validation cohort (n = 96), at a ratio of 8:2. Sixty-eight (17.8%) and 15 (15.6%) patients developed severe COVID-19 after admission in the training cohort and validation cohort, respectively. The differences in baseline characteristics were not statistically significant between the two cohorts with regard to age, sex, and comorbidities (P > 0.05). Multivariable analyses included age, C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, lactic dehydrogenase, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, urea, albumin-to-globulin ratio, and eosinophil count as predictive factors for patients with progression to severe COVID-19. A nomogram was constructed with sufficient discriminatory power (C index = 0.81), and proper consistency between the prediction and observation, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.81 and 0.86 in the training and validation cohort, respectively. Conclusion We proposed a simple nomogram for early detection of patients with non-severe COVID-19 but at high risk of progression to severe COVID-19, which could help optimize clinical care and personalized decision-making therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junyi Jiang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- Engineering Research Center of Applied Technology of Pharmacogenomics, Ministry of Education, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Changsha, Hunan, People’s Republic of China
- Aier Eye Institute, Changsha, Hunan, People’s Republic of China
| | - WeiJun Zhong
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- Engineering Research Center of Applied Technology of Pharmacogenomics, Ministry of Education, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Changsha, Hunan, People’s Republic of China
| | - WeiHua Huang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- Engineering Research Center of Applied Technology of Pharmacogenomics, Ministry of Education, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Changsha, Hunan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yongchao Gao
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- Engineering Research Center of Applied Technology of Pharmacogenomics, Ministry of Education, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Changsha, Hunan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yijing He
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- Engineering Research Center of Applied Technology of Pharmacogenomics, Ministry of Education, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Changsha, Hunan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xi Li
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- Engineering Research Center of Applied Technology of Pharmacogenomics, Ministry of Education, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Changsha, Hunan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhaoqian Liu
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- Engineering Research Center of Applied Technology of Pharmacogenomics, Ministry of Education, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Changsha, Hunan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Honghao Zhou
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- Engineering Research Center of Applied Technology of Pharmacogenomics, Ministry of Education, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Changsha, Hunan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yacheng Fu
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- Cofoe Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
| | - Rong Liu
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- Engineering Research Center of Applied Technology of Pharmacogenomics, Ministry of Education, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Changsha, Hunan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- Engineering Research Center of Applied Technology of Pharmacogenomics, Ministry of Education, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Changsha, Hunan, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Wei Zhang; Rong Liu, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 731 84805380, Fax +86 731 82354476, Email ;
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
|
30
|
Chang P, Zheng J. Updates in Cancer Rehabilitation Telehealth. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep 2022; 10:332-338. [PMID: 36408472 PMCID: PMC9643960 DOI: 10.1007/s40141-022-00372-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review To describe the various uses of telehealth as it applies to cancer rehabilitation and to review recent findings since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Recent Findings Telehealth has numerous applications in cancer rehabilitation including physiatry services, skilled therapies, exercise interventions, symptom management, and support groups. Numerous studies have shown that regular physician and skilled therapy services can be provided through telehealth platforms, though certain clinical situations may require in-person visits. Telehealth exercise-based interventions are feasible, safe, and can improve quality of life. Telehealth also may be an effective tool in symtom management and as a medium for support groups. Summary Telemedicine and telehealth platforms are effective tools in the field of cancer rehabilitation that not only provide increased safety and convenience for a burdened patient population but may also hold the potential to elevate beyond the current standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Chang
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, 250 N. Robertson Blvd, Suite 403, Beverly Hills, Los Angeles, CA 90211 USA
| | | |
Collapse
|