1
|
Morris JS, Hassan MM, Zohner YE, Wang Z, Xiao L, Rashid A, Haque A, Abdel-Wahab R, Mohamed YI, Ballard KL, Wolff RA, George B, Li L, Allen G, Weylandt M, Li D, Wang W, Raghav K, Yao J, Amin HM, Kaseb AO. HepatoScore-14: Measures of Biological Heterogeneity Significantly Improve Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk. Hepatology 2021; 73:2278-2292. [PMID: 32931023 PMCID: PMC7956911 DOI: 10.1002/hep.31555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Revised: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Therapeutic, clinical trial entry and stratification decisions for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are made based on prognostic assessments, using clinical staging systems based on small numbers of empirically selected variables that insufficiently account for differences in biological characteristics of individual patients' disease. APPROACH AND RESULTS We propose an approach for constructing risk scores from circulating biomarkers that produce a global biological characterization of individual patient's disease. Plasma samples were collected prospectively from 767 patients with HCC and 200 controls, and 317 proteins were quantified in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified biomarker testing laboratory. We constructed a circulating biomarker aberration score for each patient, a score between 0 and 1 that measures the degree of aberration of his or her biomarker panel relative to normal, which we call HepatoScore. We used log-rank tests to assess its ability to substratify patients within existing staging systems/prognostic factors. To enhance clinical application, we constructed a single-sample score, HepatoScore-14, which requires only a subset of 14 representative proteins encompassing the global biological effects. Patients with HCC were split into three distinct groups (low, medium, and high HepatoScore) with vastly different prognoses (medial overall survival 38.2/18.3/7.1 months; P < 0.0001). Furthermore, HepatoScore accurately substratified patients within levels of existing prognostic factors and staging systems (P < 0.0001 for nearly all), providing substantial and sometimes dramatic refinement of expected patient outcomes with strong therapeutic implications. These results were recapitulated by HepatoScore-14, rigorously validated in repeated training/test splits, concordant across Myriad RBM (Austin, TX) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits, and established as an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS HepatoScore-14 augments existing HCC staging systems, dramatically refining patient prognostic assessments and therapeutic decision making and enrollment in clinical trials. The underlying strategy provides a global biological characterization of disease, and can be applied broadly to other disease settings and biological media.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey S Morris
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Manal M Hassan
- Department of Epidemiology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Zeya Wang
- Department of Statistics, Rice University, Houston, TX
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Lianchun Xiao
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Asif Rashid
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Abedul Haque
- Department of Hematopathology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Reham Abdel-Wahab
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Yehia I Mohamed
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Robert A Wolff
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Bhawana George
- Department of Hematopathology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Liang Li
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Genevera Allen
- Department of Statistics, Rice University, Houston, TX
- Department of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston and Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | | | - Donghui Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Wenyi Wang
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kanwal Raghav
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - James Yao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Hesham M Amin
- Department of Hematopathology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ahmed Omar Kaseb
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stephen LL, Damour M, Kemp J, Ballard KL, McDade RL, Mapes JP. Abstract 2500: Analysis of protein biomakers in prostate and colorectal tumor lysates. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-2500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Traditional tumor biomarkers are proteins that have been shed in the bloodstream and have been critical in identifying and treating cancer. We sought to survey proteins relevant to oncology in colon and prostate tumors; in order to identify potential proteins of interest for cancer research. Four colon and three prostate tumors were homogenized and 115 proteins were analyzed from the Oncology MAP 2.0. Each tumor had 2 fractions homogenized to look at heterogeneity of the protein with the tumor. In all of the samples measured 102 of the 115 protein showed levels above the LLOQ. Five proteins (PSP94, Tenascin-X, lipocalin-1, Tie-1 and BAFF) were 100 fold higher in prostate tumors compared to colon tumors (P<0.001). PSP94 has been shown to be a prostate cancer marker in serum; however, none of the other markers have been shown to be markers of prostate tumors. Eight proteins (PECAM-1, CA 72-4, Eotaxin-2, HGF-R, CA 15-3, TATI, CEACAM6 and CEA) were greater than 10 fold higher in colon tumors compared to prostate tumors (P<0.001). Although oncology MAP 2.0 was developed for serum biomarkers, it may provide a valuable tool for examining proteins biomarkers in tumors.
Citation Format: Laurie L. Stephen, Marc Damour, Josh Kemp, Karri L. Ballard, Ralph L. McDade, James P. Mapes. Analysis of protein biomakers in prostate and colorectal tumor lysates. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2500. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-2500
Collapse
|
3
|
Kobayashi DT, Shi J, Stephen L, Ballard KL, Dewey R, Mapes J, Chung B, McCarthy K, Swoboda KJ, Crawford TO, Li R, Plasterer T, Joyce C, Chung WK, Kaufmann P, Darras BT, Finkel RS, Sproule DM, Martens WB, McDermott MP, De Vivo DC, Walker MG, Chen KS. SMA-MAP: a plasma protein panel for spinal muscular atrophy. PLoS One 2013; 8:e60113. [PMID: 23565191 PMCID: PMC3615018 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2012] [Accepted: 02/21/2013] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) presents challenges in (i) monitoring disease activity and predicting progression, (ii) designing trials that allow rapid assessment of candidate therapies, and (iii) understanding molecular causes and consequences of the disease. Validated biomarkers of SMA motor and non-motor function would offer utility in addressing these challenges. Our objectives were (i) to discover additional markers from the Biomarkers for SMA (BforSMA) study using an immunoassay platform, and (ii) to validate the putative biomarkers in an independent cohort of SMA patients collected from a multi-site natural history study (NHS). Methods BforSMA study plasma samples (N = 129) were analyzed by immunoassay to identify new analytes correlating to SMA motor function. These immunoassays included the strongest candidate biomarkers identified previously by chromatography. We selected 35 biomarkers to validate in an independent cohort SMA type 1, 2, and 3 samples (N = 158) from an SMA NHS. The putative biomarkers were tested for association to multiple motor scales and to pulmonary function, neurophysiology, strength, and quality of life measures. We implemented a Tobit model to predict SMA motor function scores. Results 12 of the 35 putative SMA biomarkers were significantly associated (p<0.05) with motor function, with a 13th analyte being nearly significant. Several other analytes associated with non-motor SMA outcome measures. From these 35 biomarkers, 27 analytes were selected for inclusion in a commercial panel (SMA-MAP) for association with motor and other functional measures. Conclusions Discovery and validation using independent cohorts yielded a set of SMA biomarkers significantly associated with motor function and other measures of SMA disease activity. A commercial SMA-MAP biomarker panel was generated for further testing in other SMA collections and interventional trials. Future work includes evaluating the panel in other neuromuscular diseases, for pharmacodynamic responsiveness to experimental SMA therapies, and for predicting functional changes over time in SMA patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dione T Kobayashi
- Spinal Muscular Atrophy Foundation, New York, New York, United States of America.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stephen LL, Ballard KL, McDade RL, Mapes JP. Abstract 4954: Development and validation of 50 serum cancer multiplexed biomarkers. Cancer Res 2010. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am10-4954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Biomarkers are indicators of normal biological processes and can be monitored to look at physiological changes. In cancer, a pattern of biomarkers may be useful for the detection, reoccurrence and response to treatment. We have identified 50 biomarkers implicated in cancer and have developed bead-based multiplexed immunoassays for the Luminex system, defined as the OncologyMAP™. Multiplexing is a cost effective method which allows for the measurement of multiple proteins with little sample volume. The OncologyMAP™ consists of markers of cell damage (Annexin A1, HMGB1), soluble receptors (uPAR, TIE-2), enzymes (PSAT-1, aldose reductase), signaling molecules (calcvasculin, EpCAM)) and growth factors (endostatin, BAFF). All markers showed positive signals in either normal serum and plasma samples or cancer serum. Multiplexed assays were run on a TECAN EVO and showed good precision, linearity and spike recovery. The OncologyMAP™ is a valuable tool for cancer biomarker discovery
Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4954.
Collapse
|