Intravenous ibandronate or sodium-fluoride--a 3.5 years study on bone density and fractures in Crohn's disease patients with osteoporosis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Osteoporosis commonly afflicts Crohn's disease (CD) patients. Management remains unclear, with limited results for intravenous (i.v.) bisphosphonates and a follow-up longer than one year. Intravenous bisphosphonates bypass gastrointestinal-tract irritation offering an interesting alternative suitable for CD patients. We tested the long-term efficacy and safety of colecalciferol and calcium with sodium-fluoride or i.v. ibandronate for osteoporosis in CD.

METHODS

66 CD patients with lumbar osteoporosis (T-score<-2.5) were randomized to receive colecalciferol (1000 IU), calcium-citrate (800 mg) and intermittent sustained-release sodium-fluoride (50 mg) [groupA, n=33] or i.v. ibandronate (1 mg/3-monthly) [groupB, n=33]. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar-spine and right femur and X-rays of the spine were performed at baseline and after 1.0, 2.25 and 3.5 years. Fracture-assessment included visual reading and quantitative morphometry of X-rays.

RESULTS

55 (83.3%) patients completed at least the 1st year available for intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, 42 (63.6%) completed the 2nd and 35 (53.0%) the 3rd year available for per-protocol analysis. Lumbar T-score increased by +0.23±0.43 (95%CI: 0.057-0.407, p<0.05), +0.71±1.05 (95%CI: 0.193-1.232, p<0.001) and +0.73±0.82 (95%CI: 0.340-1.336, p<0.001) (group A), and +0.28±0.41 (95%CI: 0.132-0.459, p<0.05), +0.43±0.55 (95%CI: 0.184-0.671, p<0.01) and +0.51±0.74 (95%CI: 0.145-0.882, p<0.001) (group B) during 1.0, 2.25 and 3.5 years follow-up time. In 2.71 years of follow-up, with the ITT analysis, the lumbar T-score increased by +0.66±0.97 (group A, p<0.001) and +0.46±0.67 (group B, p<0.001). One vertebral fracture with sodium-fluoride was not enough to detect differences between groups and the study was not powered for this. Study medication was well-tolerated and safe.

CONCLUSIONS

Sodium-fluoride and i.v. ibandronate improved osteoporosis. Keeping in mind bisphosphonates as a standard of osteoporosis care that reduce fracture-rate, data we do not have for sodium-fluoride, CD patients with osteoporosis can be treated safely with i.v. ibandronate.

Bones and Crohn’s: No benefit of adding sodium fluoride or ibandronate to calcium and vitamin D

AIM: To compare the effect of calcium and cholecalciferol alone and along with additional sodium fluoride or ibandronate on bone mineral density (BMD) and fractures in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD).

METHODS: Patients (n =148) with reduced BMD (T-score < -1) were randomized to receive cholecalciferol (1000 IU) and calcium citrate (800 mg) daily alone(group A, n = 32) or along with additional sodium fluoride (25 mg bid) (group B, n = 62) or additional ibandronate (1 mg iv/3-monthly) (group C, n = 54). Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine (L1-L4) and proximal right femur and X-rays of the spine were performed at baseline and after 1.0, 2.25 and 3.5 years. Fracture-assessment included visual reading of X-rays and quantitative morphometry of vertebral bodies (T4-L4).

RESULTS: One hundred and twenty three (83.1%) patients completed the first year for intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Ninety two (62.2%) patients completed the second year and 71 (47.8%) the third year available for per-protocol (PP) analysis. With a significant increase in T-score of the lumbar spine by +0.28 ± 0.35 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.162-0.460, P < 0.01], +0.33 ± 0.49 (95% CI: 0.109-0.558, P < 0.01), +0.43 ± 0.47 (95% CI: 0.147-0.708, P < 0.01) in group A, +0.22 ± 0.33 (95% CI: 0.125-0.321, P < 0.01); +0.47 ± 0.60 (95% CI: 0.262-0.676, P < 0.01), +0.51 ± 0.44 (95% CI: 0.338-0.682, P < 0.01) in group B and +0.22 ± 0.38 (95% CI: 0.111-0.329, P < 0.01), +0.36 ± 0.53 (95% CI: 0.147-0.578, P < 0.01), +0.41 ± 0.48 (95% CI: 0.238-0.576, P < 0.01) in group C, respectively, during the 1.0, 2.25 and 3.5 year periods (PP analysis), no treatment regimen was superior in any in- or between-group analyses. In the ITT analysis, similar results in all in- and between-group analyses with a significant in-group but non-significant between-group increase in T-score of the lumbar spine by 0.38 ± 0.46 (group A, P < 0.01), 0.37 ± 0.50 (group B, P < 0.01) and 0.35 ± 0.49 (group C, P < 0.01) was observed. Follow-up in ITT analysis was still 2.65 years. One vertebral fracture in the sodium fluoride group was detected. Study medication was safe and well tolerated.

CONCLUSION: Additional sodium fluoride or ibandronate had no benefit over calcium and cholecalciferol alone in managing reduced BMD in CD.