Methotrexate as a corticosteroid-sparing agent in leprosy reactions: A French multicenter retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Leprosy reactions (LRs) are inflammatory responses observed in 30%-50% of people with leprosy. First-line treatment is glucocorticoids (GCs), often administered at high doses with prolonged courses, resulting in high morbi-mortality. Methotrexate (MTX) is an immunomodulating agent used to treat inflammatory diseases and has an excellent safety profile and worldwide availability. In this study, we describe the efficacy, GCs-sparing effect and safety of MTX in LRs.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multicentric study in France consisting of leprosy patients receiving MTX for a reversal reaction (RR) and/or erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL) since 2016. The primary endpoint was the rate of good response (GR) defined as the complete disappearance of inflammatory cutaneous or neurological symptoms without recurrence during MTX treatment. The secondary endpoint was the GCs-sparing effect, safety and clinical relapse after MTX discontinuation.

RESULTS

Our study included 13 patients with LRs (8 men, 5 women): 6 had ENL and 7 had RR. All patients had had at least one previous course of GCs and 2 previous treatment lines before starting MTX. Overall, 8/13 (61.5%) patients had GR, allowing for GCs-sparing and even GCs withdrawal in 6/11 (54.5%). No severe adverse effects were observed. Relapse after MTX discontinuation was substantial (42%): the median relapse time was 5.5 months (range 3-14) after stopping treatment.

CONCLUSION

MTX seems to be an effective alternative treatment in LRs, allowing for GCs-sparing with a good safety profile. Furthermore, early introduction during LRs may lead to a better therapeutic response. However, its efficacy seems to suggest prolonged therapy to prevent recurrence.

Type I interferon response and vascular alteration in chilblain-like lesions during the COVID-19 outbreak

Background

The outbreak of chilblain‐like lesions (CLL) during the COVID‐19 pandemic has been reported extensively, potentially related to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, yet its underlying pathophysiology is unclear.

Objectives

To study skin and blood endothelial and immune system activation in CLL in comparison with healthy controls and seasonal chilblains (SC), defined as cold‐induced sporadic chilblains occurring during 2015 and 2019 with exclusion of chilblain lupus.

Methods

This observational study was conducted during 9–16 April 2020 at Saint‐Louis Hospital, Paris, France. All patients referred with CLL seen during this period of the COVID‐19 pandemic were included in this study. We excluded patients with a history of chilblains or chilblain lupus. Fifty patients were included.

Results

Histological patterns were similar and transcriptomic signatures overlapped in both the CLL and SC groups, with type I interferon polarization and a cytotoxic–natural killer gene signature. CLL were characterized by higher IgA tissue deposition and more significant transcriptomic activation of complement and angiogenesis factors compared with SC. We observed in CLL a systemic immune response associated with IgA antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in 73% of patients, and elevated type I interferon blood signature in comparison with healthy controls. Finally, using blood biomarkers related to endothelial dysfunction and activation, and to angiogenesis or endothelial progenitor cell mobilization, we confirmed endothelial dysfunction in CLL.

Conclusions

Our findings support an activation loop in the skin in CLL associated with endothelial alteration and immune infiltration of cytotoxic and type I IFN‐polarized cells leading to clinical manifestations.

Activation endothéliale associée aux ANCA IgA au cours des lésions de lésions acrales pendant l’épidémie de COVID-19

Introduction

Matériel et méthodes

Résultats

Discussion

P10.06 Stiff limb syndrome associated to anti NMDA-R antibodies

BACKGROUND

Stiff person spectrum disorder is a group of rare conditions clinically characterized by the core symptoms of fluctuating muscular stiffness with superimposed spasms and an exaggerated startle response (hyperkplexia). It includes multiple variants amongst which are focal forms like stiff limb syndrome. Up to date, it was described in association with a spectrum of antibodies interfering with gabaergic transmission, most frequently antibodies targeting GAD, glycine receptor, amphiphysin and more rare dipeptidylpeptidase like protein 6, gephyrin, GABAAR and Glycine transporter 2.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We report the case of a stiff limb syndrome associated to anti-NMDAR antibodies. The patient, a French 44-year male, with no antecedents presents with a 2-month history of painful spasms in his both legs resulting in a difficulty of walking and multiple falls. The diagnosis was supported by a stiff limb syndrome clinical pattern, a clinical response to treatment with benzodiazepines and baclofen and by the absence of other neurological finding that could have suggested an alternative diagnosis.

RESULTS

Anti NMDA-R antibodies were identified in blood and CSF samples using both immunofluorescence and cell-based assay. Any other intracellular and surface antibodies were negatives, GAD-ab included. Oncological evaluation was negative. The patient didn’t present encephalopathy signs and neuropsychological evaluation was normal. The patient received immunotherapy with one cure of intravenous immunoglobulins after an only partial improvement with symptomatic treatment.

CONCLUSION

This is the first case report of an association between the anti NMDA-R and stiff limb syndrome. Further investigations are needed to provide a better understanding of the pathophysiology of stiff person spectrum disorders.