1
|
Naumann LM, Lauria M, Kishan AU, Kaprealian TB, Cao M, Savjani RR, Iwamoto K, Sandstrom RE, Strause L, Steinberg ML, Low D. Clinical Implementation of Weak Magnetic Field Generator in Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e701-e702. [PMID: 37786058 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.2188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) The application of weak magnetic fields may improve radiation therapy efficacy by manipulating the free radical activity induced by radiation to optimize tumor death. Once the device is commercially available, we will conduct clinical trials to determine the clinical impact of the weak magnetic field. However, the magnetic field generator (MFG) restricts Linac gantry rotation to approximately 180° and this limitation may limit treatment plan quality. This work is a continuation of an ongoing study to determine if the gantry angle restrictions can be compensated for during treatment planning. MATERIALS/METHODS Previous work has demonstrated the feasibility for GBM cases. For this work, 10 prostate cancer treatment plans were retrospectively replanned using only coplanar arcs that spanned from 90° to 270° (half-arcs). The prescriptions were 60 Gy for 6 patients, 55.8 Gy for 2 patients, 54 Gy for 1 patient, and 40.05 Gy for 1 patient. The prescription doses were delivered to 95% of the planning target volume (PTV = GTV + 2 cm). The critical structure doses were compared to determine if clinically equivalent plans could be delivered using half-arcs. RESULTS The dose criteria that were met by the clinical plans were also met by the half-arc plans except for the cases shown in Table 1. Table 1: Doses that did not meet criteria CONCLUSION: The half-arc plans were able to deliver clinically equivalent dose distributions as the clinical treatment plans. This provides continuing evidence that clinical trials will be able to be developed to evaluate the use of weak magnetic fields for radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L M Naumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - A U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - T B Kaprealian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - M Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - R R Savjani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - K Iwamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | - M L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - D Low
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Richards JM, Gonzalez R, Schwarzenberger P, Whitman E, Stardal K, Westhoff C, Moss R, Strause L, Selk L. Phase I trial of IL-2 plasmid DNA with electroporation in metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2007. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.8578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
8578 Background: Significant toxicity limits the systemic delivery of high-dose recombinant Interleukin-2 (IL-2). An alternative method for extended dosing of IL-2 that may reduce toxicity is by intratumoral injection of IL-2 plasmid DNA (pDNA) with electroporation (EP). Methods: A phase I dose-escalation trial is ongoing in subjects with metastatic melanoma to evaluate the safety of intratumoral delivery of IL-2 pDNA (VCL-IM01, Vical Inc., San Diego, CA) followed by EP (MedPulser DNA EPT System, Inovio, San Diego, CA). Eligible subjects have recurrent metastatic melanoma; an injectable lesion = 1 cm2 and < 25 cm2; ECOG 0 or 1; LDH = 1.5 × ULN, and no brain or liver metastases. In the dose-escalation stage of the trial, 3 subjects in each dose cohort received up to 2 cycles of treatment, each consisting of 4 weekly injections followed by a 4-week observation period. Dose levels included 0.5, 1.5, 5.0 mg/tumor, and 15.0 mg (5 mg in each of 3 tumors). A safety assessment was conducted for each cohort prior to enrollment of the next cohort. In the 2nd trial stage, 17 subjects are to be enrolled at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The observation period is shortened to 2 weeks between cycles. For all subjects, safety is assessed at every visit. Results: 12 subjects (7 male, 5 female) were enrolled in the dose escalation stage, 3 subjects at each dose. Ages range from 38 to 86 years. No Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) were reported related to study drug or procedures. All related AEs (12 reported) were Grade 1: 5 related to study drug, 4 to the EP procedure, and 3 to both. Injection site pain was the most common AE. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred; thus the MTD was defined as the 15 mg dose (5 mg/tumor in 3 tumors). To date, 6/17 subjects in Stage 2 of the trial (5 mg/tumor, up to 3 tumors injected) have been enrolled with no Grade 3 or 4 AEs related to study drug or injection/EP procedures. Physicians have observed responses in treated and untreated lesions. Overall response data will be presented. Conclusions: Intratumoral administration of IL-2 pDNA with EP appears safe and well tolerated in 18 patients with metastatic melanoma when given up to a 15 mg dose (5 mg/tumor). Preliminary indications of decreased tumor size suggest local and systemic activity of IL-2 pDNA with EP. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. M. Richards
- Oncology Specialists, SC, Park Ridge, IL; University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO; Sacred Heart Medical Oncology Group, Mobile, AL; Mountainside Hospital, Montclair, NJ; Vical Incorporated, San Diego, CA; Vical Inc., San Diego, CA
| | - R. Gonzalez
- Oncology Specialists, SC, Park Ridge, IL; University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO; Sacred Heart Medical Oncology Group, Mobile, AL; Mountainside Hospital, Montclair, NJ; Vical Incorporated, San Diego, CA; Vical Inc., San Diego, CA
| | - P. Schwarzenberger
- Oncology Specialists, SC, Park Ridge, IL; University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO; Sacred Heart Medical Oncology Group, Mobile, AL; Mountainside Hospital, Montclair, NJ; Vical Incorporated, San Diego, CA; Vical Inc., San Diego, CA
| | - E. Whitman
- Oncology Specialists, SC, Park Ridge, IL; University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO; Sacred Heart Medical Oncology Group, Mobile, AL; Mountainside Hospital, Montclair, NJ; Vical Incorporated, San Diego, CA; Vical Inc., San Diego, CA
| | - K. Stardal
- Oncology Specialists, SC, Park Ridge, IL; University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO; Sacred Heart Medical Oncology Group, Mobile, AL; Mountainside Hospital, Montclair, NJ; Vical Incorporated, San Diego, CA; Vical Inc., San Diego, CA
| | - C. Westhoff
- Oncology Specialists, SC, Park Ridge, IL; University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO; Sacred Heart Medical Oncology Group, Mobile, AL; Mountainside Hospital, Montclair, NJ; Vical Incorporated, San Diego, CA; Vical Inc., San Diego, CA
| | - R. Moss
- Oncology Specialists, SC, Park Ridge, IL; University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO; Sacred Heart Medical Oncology Group, Mobile, AL; Mountainside Hospital, Montclair, NJ; Vical Incorporated, San Diego, CA; Vical Inc., San Diego, CA
| | - L. Strause
- Oncology Specialists, SC, Park Ridge, IL; University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO; Sacred Heart Medical Oncology Group, Mobile, AL; Mountainside Hospital, Montclair, NJ; Vical Incorporated, San Diego, CA; Vical Inc., San Diego, CA
| | - L. Selk
- Oncology Specialists, SC, Park Ridge, IL; University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO; Sacred Heart Medical Oncology Group, Mobile, AL; Mountainside Hospital, Montclair, NJ; Vical Incorporated, San Diego, CA; Vical Inc., San Diego, CA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
The effects of calcium supplementation (as calcium citrate malate, 1000 mg elemental Ca/d) with and without the addition of zinc (15.0 mg/d), manganese (5.0 mg/d) and copper (2.5 mg/d) on spinal bone loss (L2-L4 vertebrae) was evaluated in healthy older postmenopausal women (n = 59, mean age 66 y) in a 2-y, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Changes (mean +/- SEM) in bone density were -3.53 +/- 1.24% (placebo), -1.89 +/- 1.40% (trace minerals only), -1.25 +/- 1.46% (calcium only) and 1.48 +/- 1.40% (calcium plus trace minerals). Bone loss relative to base-line value was significant (P = 0.0061) in the placebo group but not in the groups receiving trace minerals alone, calcium alone, or calcium plus trace minerals. The only significant group difference occurred between the placebo group and the group receiving calcium plus trace minerals (P = 0.0099). These data suggest that bone loss in calcium-supplemented, older postmenopausal women can be further arrested by concomitant increases in trace mineral intake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Strause
- Department of Biology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla 92093
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
The cross-sectional relationship between long-term estrogen use and vertebral (L2-4) bone mineral density (BMD) was determined in 65 postmenopausal white women between 55 and 75 years who were at least 10 years from their menopause. Long-term estrogen users began therapy within 5 years of menopause and continued for a duration of at least 10 years. The mean duration of use was 19.8 years. Controls used estrogen for less than 1 year. There was a significant difference (p less than 0.02) in mean spinal BMD between estrogen users (1.219 g/cm2) and controls (1.092 g/cm2). There was no significant difference in age, height, weight, or dietary calcium (Ca) intake between the two groups. The statistical difference in BMD was retained when (1) 23 estrogen users were paired with age-matched controls, (2) only women with a natural menopause or history of bilateral oophorectomy were included, and (3) only women with a natural menopause were compared. A spinal BMD below the estimated fracture threshold of 0.965 g/cm2 was found in 11 of 40 controls and only 2 of 25 estrogen users. Comparison of estrogen users with a natural menopause to those with bilateral oophorectomy revealed no significant difference in BMD. These data confirm the salutary effect of long-term estrogen use in the maintenance of vertebral bone mass in postmenopausal women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Moore
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92093
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hegenauer J, Strause L, Saltman P, Dann D, White J, Green R. Transitory hematologic effects of moderate exercise are not influenced by iron supplementation. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1983; 52:57-61. [PMID: 6686130 DOI: 10.1007/bf00429026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
A young women's exercise/fitness class tested the idea that administration of supplemental iron would prevent "sports anemia" that may develop during exercise and training and improve iron status of exercising females of menstrual age. Fifteen women (aged 18-37) were selected for each of three treatment groups: (1) no supplemental iron; (2) 9 mg X d-1 of Fe; and (3) 18 mg X d-1 of Fe (1 US Recommended Daily Allowance). Women exercised at approximately 85% of maximal heartrate for progressively increasing lengths of time in a jogging program and worked up to 45 min of exercise 4 d X week-1 for 8 weeks. Hematologic analysis was performed in weeks 1, 5, and 8. A significant decline in hemoglobin (Hb) concentration and hematocrit (Hct) was observed at week 5 when all data were examined without regard for iron intake; these red cell indices returned to pre-exercise levels by week 8. Reduction of mean cell hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) indicated that the midpoint decline was not caused by simple hemodilution during exercise. Serum ferritin (SF) concentration changed in parallel with Hb and Hct. Although the midpoint decline in SF was not statistically significant, it ruled out the possibility that turnover of red cell iron was directed to storage. Lowered MCHC and SF suggested lower availability of iron during the synthesis of a new generation of red cells. Few iron treatment effects of magnitude were observed. Iron did not prevent the midpoint decline in Hb concentration. Iron intake did not affect SF, serum iron, transferrin saturation, or final Hb, and Hct.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Collapse
|