Race and Odds of Surgery Offer in Small Bowel and Pancreas Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Despite existing society guidelines, management of pancreatic (PanNEN) and small bowel (SBNEN) neuroendocrine neoplasms remains inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to identify patient- and/or disease-specific characteristics associated with increased odds of being offered surgery for PanNEN and SBNEN.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program database and the National Cancer Database (NCDB) were queried for patients with PanNEN/SBNEN. Demographic and pathologic data were compared between patients who were offered surgery and those who were not. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors independently associated with being offered surgery.

RESULTS

In SEER, there were 3641 patients with PanNEN (54.7% were offered surgery) and 5720 with SBNEN (86.0% were offered surgery). On multivariate analysis of SEER, non-white race was associated with decreased odds of surgery offer for SBNEN [odds ratio (OR) 0.58, p < 0.001], but not PanNEN (p = 0.187). In NCDB, there were 28,483 patients with PanNEN (57.5% were offered surgery) and 42,675 with SBNEN (86.9% were offered surgery). On multivariate analysis of NCDB, non-white race was also associated with decreased odds of surgery offer for SBNEN (OR 0.61, p < 0.001) but not PanNEN (p = 0.414).

CONCLUSIONS

This study's findings suggest that, in addition to previously reported disparities in surgical resection and surgery refusal rates, racial/ethnic disparities also exist earlier in the course of treatment, with non-white patients being less likely to be offered surgery for SBNEN but not for PanNEN; this is potentially due to discrepancies in rates of referral to academic centers for pancreas and small bowel malignancies.

Impact of Prehabilitation on Postoperative Mortality and the Need for Non-Home Discharge in High-Risk Surgical Patients

BACKGROUND

The preoperative period is an important target for interventions (eg Surgical Prehabilitation and Readiness [SPAR]) that can improve postoperative outcomes for older patients with comorbidities.

STUDY DESIGN

To determine whether a preoperative multidisciplinary prehabilitation program (SPAR) reduces postoperative 30-day mortality and the need for non-home discharge in high-risk surgical patients, surgical patients enrolled in a prehabilitation program targeting physical activity, pulmonary function, nutrition, and mindfulness were compared with historical control patients from 1 institution's American College of Surgeons (ACS) NSQIP database. SPAR patients were propensity score-matched 1:3 to pre-SPAR NSQIP patients, and their outcomes were compared. The ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator was used to compare observed-to-expected ratios for postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 246 patients were enrolled in SPAR. A 6-month compliance audit revealed that overall patient adherence to the SPAR program was 89%. At the time of analysis, 118 SPAR patients underwent surgery with 30 days of follow-up. Compared with pre-SPAR NSQIP patients (n = 4,028), SPAR patients were significantly older with worse functional status and more comorbidities. Compared with propensity score-matched pre-SPAR NSQIP patients, SPAR patients had significantly decreased 30-day mortality (0% vs 4.1%, p = 0.036) and decreased need for discharge to postacute care facilities (6.5% vs 15.9%, p = 0.014). Similarly, SPAR patients exhibited decreased observed 30-day mortality (observed-to-expected ratio 0.41) and need for discharge to a facility (observed-to-expected ratio 0.56) compared with their expected outcomes using the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator.

CONCLUSIONS

The SPAR program is safe and feasible and may reduce postoperative mortality and the need for discharge to postacute care facilities in high-risk surgical patients.

4,300 steps per day prior to surgery are associated with improved outcomes after pancreatectomy

BACKGROUND

Decreased preoperative physical fitness and low physical activity have been associated with preoperative functional reserve and surgical complications. We sought to evaluate daily step count as a measure of physical activity and its relationship with post-pancreatectomy outcomes.

METHODS

Patients undergoing pancreatectomy were given a remote telemonitoring device to measure their preoperative levels of physical activity. Patient activity, demographics, and perioperative outcomes were collected and compared in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

73 patients were included. 45 (61.6%) patients developed complications, with 17 (23.3%) of those patients developing severe complications. These patients walked 3437.8 (SD 1976.7) average daily steps, compared to 5918.8 (SD 2851.1) in patients without severe complications (p < 0.001). In logistic regression analysis, patients who walked less than 4274.5 steps had significantly higher odds of severe complications (OR = 7.5 (CI 2.1, 26.8), p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Average daily steps below 4274.5 before surgery are associated with severe complications after pancreatectomy. Preoperative physical activity levels may represent a modifiable target for prehabilitation protocols.

Predicting Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Pancreatectomy Using Wearable Technology and Machine Learning: Prospective Cohort Study

Background

Pancreatic cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths, and although pancreatectomy is currently the only curative treatment, it is associated with significant morbidity.

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of wearable telemonitoring technologies to predict treatment outcomes using patient activity metrics and machine learning.

Methods

In this prospective, single-center, single-cohort study, patients scheduled for pancreatectomy were provided with a wearable telemonitoring device to be worn prior to surgery. Patient clinical data were collected and all patients were evaluated using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program surgical risk calculator (ACS-NSQIP SRC). Machine learning models were developed to predict whether patients would have a textbook outcome and compared with the ACS-NSQIP SRC using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves.

Results

Between February 2019 and February 2020, 48 patients completed the study. Patient activity metrics were collected over an average of 27.8 days before surgery. Patients took an average of 4162.1 (SD 4052.6) steps per day and had an average heart rate of 75.6 (SD 14.8) beats per minute. Twenty-eight (58%) patients had a textbook outcome after pancreatectomy. The group of 20 (42%) patients who did not have a textbook outcome included 14 patients with severe complications and 11 patients requiring readmission. The ACS-NSQIP SRC had an AUROC curve of 0.6333 to predict failure to achieve a textbook outcome, while our model combining patient clinical characteristics and patient activity data achieved the highest performance with an AUROC curve of 0.7875.

Conclusions

Machine learning models outperformed ACS-NSQIP SRC estimates in predicting textbook outcomes after pancreatectomy. The highest performance was observed when machine learning models incorporated patient clinical characteristics and activity metrics.

Comparison of EMG activity of medial and lateral hamstrings during isometric contractions at various cuff weight loads

Since both the medial head (MH) and lateral head (LH) of the hamstring muscles contribute to knee flexion, this study investigated whether the relative electrical activity of these heads remained constant with respect to each other or changed during isometric contractions at five different resistance levels. The relative electrical activity of these two heads was determined by comparing their integrated EMG (iEMG). Forty-two volunteers with no history of right lower extremity injury or disease, between the ages of 18 and 35, were studied. Following motor point location, surface electrodes were placed over the MH and LH. Subjects, positioned prone, flexed the knee to 45 degrees using a sawhorse as a tactile cue to help maintain this position. Three recordings, 8 s in length, were taken at each subject's maximum isometric contraction and then using cuff weights of 1, 3, 5, and 7% of their body weight. The average of the three recordings was used in the analysis. During maximum isometric contraction (at 45 degrees of knee flexion), the LH contributes a significantly greater percent of the total iEMG (63.4%) than the MH (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, within the four submaximal levels tested, the LH's contribution was significantly greater than the MH (P < 0.01). During submaximal isometric contractions, the LH percent contribution to total iEMG was less than its contribution during maximal isometric contraction, all P values < 0.005. As a result, during these same submaximal isometric contractions, the MH contribution to total iEMG was greater than its contribution during maximal isometric contraction, all P values < 0.005).