The VASCERN-VASCA Working Group Diagnostic and Management Pathways for Venous Malformations

To elaborate expert consensus patient pathways to guide patients and physicians toward efficient diagnostics and management of patients with venous malformations.

Methods

VASCERN-VASCA (https://vascern.eu/) is a European network of multidisciplinary centers for Vascular Anomalies. The Nominal Group Technique was used to establish the pathways. Two facilitators were identified: one to propose initial discussion points and draw the pathways, and another to chair the discussion. A dermatologist (AD) was chosen as first facilitator due to her specific clinical and research experience. The draft was subsequently discussed within VASCERN-VASCA monthly virtual meetings and annual face-to-face meetings.

Results

The Pathway starts from the clinical suspicion of a venous type malformation (VM) and lists the clinical characteristics to look for to support this suspicion. Strategies for subsequent imaging and histopathology are suggested. These aim to inform on the diagnosis and to separate the patients into 4 subtypes: (1) sporadic single VMs or (2) multifocal, (3) familial, multifocal, and (4) combined and/or syndromic VMs. The management of each type is detailed in subsequent pages of the pathway, which are color coded to identify sections on (1) clinical evaluations, (2) investigations, (3) treatments, and (4) associated genes. Actions relevant to all types are marked in separate boxes, including when imaging is recommended. When definite diagnoses have been reached, the pathway also points toward disease-specific additional investigations and recommendations for follow up. Options for management are discussed for each subtype, including conservative and invasive treatments, as well as novel molecular therapies.

Conclusion

The collaborative efforts of VASCERN-VASCA, a network of the 9 Expert Centers, has led to a consensus Diagnostic and Management Pathways for VMs to assist clinicians and patients. It also emphasizes the role of multidisciplinary expert centers in the management of VM patients. This pathway will become available on the VASCERN website (http://vascern.eu/).

GNA11-mutated Sturge-Weber Syndrome has distinct neurologic and dermatologic features

BACKGROUND

Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS) is a neurocutaneous disorder characterized by clinical manifestations involving the brain, eye and skin. SWS is commonly caused by somatic mutations in G protein subunit Alpha Q (GNAQ). Subunit Alpha 11 (GNA11) mutations have been reported in 5 cases. It is not clear if their phenotypic features differ.

METHODS

Within two European multidisciplinary centers we looked for patients with clinical characteristics of SWS and a GNA11 mutation. Clinical and radiological data was collected retrospectively and prospectively.

RESULTS

We identified three patients with SWS associated with a somatic GNA11 mutation. They had disseminated capillary malformation (CM) and hyper- or hypotrophy of an extremity. At birth, the CMs of the face, trunk and limbs were pink and patchy, and slowly darkened with age evolving to purple color. Two of the patients had glaucoma. All had neurological symptoms and moderate brain atrophy at a lower degree of severity than classically associated with SWS. Susceptibility-Weighted Images (SWI) and contrast-enhanced (CE) Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) MR views demonstrated best sensitivity to reveal the pial angiomas.

CONCLUSIONS

We differentiate two distinct clinical/radiological phenotypes of SWS; GNAQ- and GNA11-SWS. The classical GNAQ-SWS is characterized by a homogeneous dark-red CM commonly associated with underlying soft tissue hypertrophy. The CM in GNA11-SWS is more reticulate and darkens with time; neurological picture is milder. SWI and post contrast FLAIR sequences appear to be necessary to demonstrate the leptomeningeal angiomatosis. Yet, anti-epileptic medication or future targeted therapies may be useful, like in classic SWS.

Feasibility of Imaging-Guided Adrenalectomy in Young Patients With Primary Aldosteronism

Many of the patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) are denied curative adrenalectomy because of limited availability or failure of adrenal vein sampling. It has been suggested that adrenal vein sampling can be omitted in young patients with a unilateral adrenal nodule, who show a florid biochemical PA phenotype. As this suggestion was based on a very low quality of evidence, we tested the applicability and accuracy of imaging, performed by computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance, for identification of unilateral PA, as determined by biochemical and/or clinical cure after unilateral adrenalectomy. Among 1625 patients with PA submitted to adrenal vein sampling in a multicenter multiethnic international study, 473 were ≤45 years of age; 231 of them had exhaustive imaging and follow-up data. Fifty-three percentage had a unilateral adrenal nodule, 43% had no nodules, and 4% bilateral nodules. Fifty-six percentage (n=131) received adrenalectomy and 128 were unambiguously diagnosed as unilateral PA. A unilateral adrenal nodule on imaging and hypokalemia were the strongest predictors of unilateral PA at regression analysis. Accordingly, imaging allowed correct identification of the responsible adrenal in 95% of the adrenalectomized patients with a unilateral nodule. The rate raised to 100% in the patients with hypokalemia, who comprised 29% of the total, but fell to 88% in those without hypokalemia. Therefore, a unilateral nodule and hypokalemia could be used to identify unilateral PA in patients ≤45 years of age if adrenal vein sampling is not easily available. However, adrenal vein sampling remains indispensable in 71% of the young patients, who showed no nodules/bilateral nodules at imaging and/or no hypokalemia. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01234220.

Identification of Surgically Curable Primary Aldosteronism by Imaging in a Large, Multiethnic International Study

CONTEXT

Adrenal gland imaging is recommended by the current guidelines for the workup of primary aldosteronism (PA). However, its diagnostic performance has not been established in large, multiethnic cohorts of patients who undergo adrenal vein sampling (AVS) and adrenalectomy.

OBJECTIVE

This work aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of cross-sectional adrenal imaging.

METHODS

This international multicenter study took place in tertiary referral centers. A total of 1625 PA patients seeking surgical cure were enrolled in an international study involving 19 centers in North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Of these, 1311 (81%) had imaging data available and 369 (23%), who received a final diagnosis of surgically cured unilateral PA, were examined. Patients underwent AVS and imaging by computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging. The accuracy of detection of unilateral PA at imaging was estimated by the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve using cure (biochemical and/or full clinical success) as the reference at follow-up after unilateral adrenalectomy.

RESULTS

In the cohort of 1311 patients with imaging data available, 34% and 7% of cases showed no detectable or bilateral nodules, respectively. Imaging did not detect the culprit adrenal in 28% of the surgically cured unilateral PA patients. Moreover, the clinical outcome did not differ significantly between the imaging-positive and imaging-negative patients.

CONCLUSION

Cross-sectional imaging did not identify a lateralized cause of disease in around 40% of PA patients and failed to identify the culprit adrenal in more than one-fourth of patients with unilateral PA.

The de novo FAIRification process of a registry for vascular anomalies

BACKGROUND

Patient data registries that are FAIR-Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable for humans and computers-facilitate research across multiple resources. This is particularly relevant to rare diseases, where data often are scarce and scattered. Specific research questions can be asked across FAIR rare disease registries and other FAIR resources without physically combining the data. Further, FAIR implies well-defined, transparent access conditions, which supports making sensitive data as open as possible and as closed as necessary.

RESULTS

We successfully developed and implemented a process of making a rare disease registry for vascular anomalies FAIR from its conception-de novo. Here, we describe the five phases of this process in detail: (i) pre-FAIRification, (ii) facilitating FAIRification, (iii) data collection, (iv) generating FAIR data in real-time, and (v) using FAIR data. This includes the creation of an electronic case report form and a semantic data model of the elements to be collected (in this case: the "Set of Common Data Elements for Rare Disease Registration" released by the European Commission), and the technical implementation of automatic, real-time data FAIRification in an Electronic Data Capture system. Further, we describe how we contribute to the four facets of FAIR, and how our FAIRification process can be reused by other registries.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, a detailed de novo FAIRification process of a registry for vascular anomalies is described. To a large extent, the process may be reused by other rare disease registries, and we envision this work to be a substantial contribution to an ecosystem of FAIR rare disease resources.

De-novo FAIRification via an Electronic Data Capture system by automated transformation of filled electronic Case Report Forms into machine-readable data

INTRODUCTION

Existing methods to make data Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) are usually carried out in a post hoc manner: after the research project is conducted and data are collected. De-novo FAIRification, on the other hand, incorporates the FAIRification steps in the process of a research project. In medical research, data is often collected and stored via electronic Case Report Forms (eCRFs) in Electronic Data Capture (EDC) systems. By implementing a de novo FAIRification process in such a system, the reusability and, thus, scalability of FAIRification across research projects can be greatly improved. In this study, we developed and implemented a novel method for de novo FAIRification via an EDC system. We evaluated our method by applying it to the Registry of Vascular Anomalies (VASCA).

METHODS

Our EDC and research project independent method ensures that eCRF data entered into an EDC system can be transformed into machine-readable, FAIR data using a semantic data model (a canonical representation of the data, based on ontology concepts and semantic web standards) and mappings from the model to questions on the eCRF. The FAIRified data are stored in a triple store and can, together with associated metadata, be accessed and queried through a FAIR Data Point. The method was implemented in Castor EDC, an EDC system, through a data transformation application. The FAIRness of the output of the method, the FAIRified data and metadata, was evaluated using the FAIR Evaluation Services.

RESULTS

We successfully applied our FAIRification method to the VASCA registry. Data entered on eCRFs is automatically transformed into machine-readable data and can be accessed and queried using SPARQL queries in the FAIR Data Point. Twenty-one FAIR Evaluator tests pass and one test regarding the metadata persistence policy fails, since this policy is not in place yet.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we developed a novel method for de novo FAIRification via an EDC system. Its application in the VASCA registry and the automated FAIR evaluation show that the method can be used to make clinical research data FAIR when they are entered in an eCRF without any intervention from data management and data entry personnel. Due to the generic approach and developed tooling, we believe that our method can be used in other registries and clinical trials as well.

Drug-resistant hypertension in primary aldosteronism patients undergoing adrenal vein sampling: the AVIS-2-RH study

AIMS

We aimed at determining the rate of drug-resistant arterial hypertension in patients with an unambiguous diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA). Moreover, we sought for investigating the diagnostic performance of adrenal vein sampling (AVS), and the effect of adrenalectomy on blood pressure (BP) and prior treatment resistance in PA patients subtyped by AVS in major referral centres.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Adrenal Vein Sampling International Study-2 (AVIS-2) was a multicentre international study that recruited consecutive PA patients submitted to AVS, according to current guidelines, during 15 years. The patients were over 18 years old with arterial hypertension and had an unambiguous diagnosis of PA. The rate of resistant hypertension was assessed at baseline and after adrenalectomy using the American Heart Association (AHA) 2018 definition. Information on presence or absence of resistant hypertension was available in 89% of the 1625 enrolled PA patients. Based on the AHA 2018 criteria, resistant hypertension was found in 20% of patients, of which about two-thirds (14%) were men and one-third (6%) women (χ2 = 17.1, P < 1*10-4) with a higher rate of RH in men than in women (23% vs. 15% P < 1*10-4). Of the 292 patients with resistant hypertension, 98 (34%) underwent unilateral AVS-guided adrenalectomy, which resolved BP resistance to antihypertensive treatment in all.

CONCLUSIONS

(i) Resistant hypertension is a common presentation in patients seeking surgical cure of PA; (ii) AVS is key for the optimal management of patients with PA due to resistant hypertension; and (iii) AVS-guided adrenalectomy allowed resolution of treatment-resistant hypertension.

Efficacy of Sirolimus in Patients Requiring Tracheostomy for Life-Threatening Lymphatic Malformation of the Head and Neck: A Report From the European Reference Network

Extensive lymphatic malformations (LMs) of the head and neck region may require tracheostomy to secure the airway. Treatment of these life-threatening LMs is usually multimodal and includes sclerotherapy and surgery, among others. Recently, systemic therapy with sirolimus has been introduced as an effective treatment for venous and lymphatic malformations; its efficacy and safety profile in patients with extensive LM requiring tracheostomy are, however, as yet not fully known. We performed a retrospective, multicenter review and identified 13 patients with an extensive LM of the head and neck region, who previously underwent placement of tracheostomy and subsequently received sirolimus treatment with the aim to improve the local respiratory situation and remove the tracheostomy. Under sirolimus therapy, tracheostomy could be reversed in 8/13 (62%) patients, a further 2/13 (15%) patients improved markedly, and removal of the tracheostomy was planned at the time of writing, while 3/13 (23%) patients showed insufficient or absent response to sirolimus, rendering tracheostomy reversal not feasible. The median duration of sirolimus treatment until removal of tracheostomy was 18 months (range, 8 months to 5.6 years). Adverse events of sirolimus therapy were common [10/13 (77%) patients], yet the majority of these were mild [9/10 (90%) patients] and only one severe adverse event was recorded, with ulceration and necrosis at a catheter insertion site. In conclusion, sirolimus can be considered an effective and safe salvage treatment in patients with extensive LM even after placement of a tracheostomy, as closure of the latter was possible in the majority of patients (62%) of our retrospective cohort. A better understanding of when to start sirolimus therapy, of the duration of treatment, and of factors allowing the prediction of treatment response will require further investigation.

Applying the FAIR Data Principles to the Registry of Vascular Anomalies (VASCA)

BACKGROUND

Connecting currently existing, heterogeneous rare disease (RD) registries would greatly facilitate epidemiological and clinical research. To increase their interoperability, the European Union developed a set of Common Data Elements (CDEs) for RD registries.

OBJECTIVES

To implement the CDEs and the FAIR data principles in the Registry of Vascular Anomalies (VASCA).

METHODS

We created a semantic model for the CDE and transformed this into a Resource Description Framework (RDF) template. The electronic case report forms (eCRF) were mapped to the RDF template and published in a FAIR Data Point (FDP).

RESULTS

The FAIR VASCA registry was successfully implemented using Castor EDC (Electronic Data Capture) software.

CONCLUSION

FAIR technology allows researchers to query and combine data from different registries in real-time.

Clinical Outcomes of 1625 Patients With Primary Aldosteronism Subtyped With Adrenal Vein Sampling

We sought to measure the clinical benefits of adrenal venous sampling (AVS), a test recommended by guidelines for primary aldosteronism (PA) patients seeking surgical cure, in a large registry of PA patients submitted to AVS. Data of 1625 consecutive patients submitted to AVS in 19 tertiary referral centers located in Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America were collected in a large multicenter international registry. The primary end points were the rate of bilateral success, ascertained lateralization of PA, adrenalectomy, and of cured arterial hypertension among AVS-guided and non AVS-guided adrenalectomy patients. AVS was successful in 80.1% of all cases but allowed identification of unilateral PA in only 45.5% by the criteria in use at each center. Adrenalectomy was performed in 41.8% of all patients and cured arterial hypertension in 19.6% of the patients, 2-fold more frequently in women than men (P<0.001). When AVS-guided, surgery provided a higher rate of cure of hypertension than when non-AVS-guided (40.0% versus 30.5%; P=0.027). Compared with surgical cases, patients treated medically needed more antihypertensive medications (P<0.001) and exhibited a higher rate of persistent hypokalemia requiring potassium supplementation (4.9% versus 2.3%; P<0.01). The low rate of adrenalectomy and cure of hypertension in PA patients seeking surgical cure indicates suboptimal AVS use, possibly related to issues in patient selection, technical success, and AVS data interpretation. Given the better outcomes of AVS-guided adrenalectomy, these results call for actions to improve the diagnostic use of this test that is necessary for detection of surgical PA candidates. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01234220.

Quality of Life in Primary Aldosteronism: A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Adrenalectomy and Medical Treatment

CONTEXT

In primary aldosteronism (PA), two subtypes are distinguished: aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) and bilateral adrenal hyperplasia (BAH). In general, these are treated by adrenalectomy (ADX) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), respectively.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of surgical treatment and medical treatment on quality of life (QoL).

DESIGN

Post hoc comparative effectiveness study within the Subtyping Primary Aldosteronism: A Randomized Trial Comparing Adrenal Vein Sampling and Computed Tomography Scan (SPARTACUS) trial.

SETTING

Twelve Dutch hospitals and one Polish hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with PA (n = 184).

INTERVENTIONS

ADX or MRAs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

At baseline and 6-month and 1-year follow-up, we assessed QoL by two validated questionnaires: RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 (RAND SF-36) and European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D).

RESULTS

At baseline, seven of eight RAND SF-36 subscales and both summary scores, as well as three of five EQ-5D dimensions and the visual analog scale, were lower in patients with PA compared with the general population, especially in women. The beneficial effects of ADX were larger than for MRAs for seven RAND SF-36 subscales, both summary scores, and health change. For the EQ-5D, we detected a difference in favor of ADX in two dimensions and the visual analog scale. Most differences in QoL between both treatments exceeded the minimally clinically important difference. After 1 year, almost all QoL measures had normalized for adrenalectomized patients. For patients on medical treatment, most QoL measures had improved but not all to the level of the general population.

CONCLUSION

Both treatments improve QoL in PA, underscoring the importance of identifying these patients. QoL improved more after ADX for suspected APA than after initiation of medical treatment for suspected BAH.

A single-centre experience of the implementation of adrenal vein sampling procedure: the impact on the diagnostic work-up in primary aldosteronism

BACKGROUND

Primary aldosteronism is one of the most common causes of secondary hypertension. Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) remains a "gold standard" procedure in differentiation between unilateral (adenoma) and bilateral (hyperplasia) disease.

AIM

The aim of this study was to present our single-centre experience in establishing and implementating the AVS procedure.

METHODS

All patients had primary aldosteronism confirmed in a salt-infusion test. AVS was performed sequentially during a continuous intravenous infusion of cosyntropin and was preceded by multislice contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) examination of adrenal glands performed a few weeks before AVS in the majority of patients. AVS was regarded as successful if the ratio of each adrenal vein cortisol to inferior vena cava cortisol levels (selectivity index [SI]) was higher than 3.0. In the case of failure, a second attempt was considered in a few weeks. Patients were divided into four groups according to the order of the procedure by quartiles.

RESULTS

Between 31 May, 2012 and 5 May, 2016, AVS was performed in 124 patients (69% males, aged 55.3 ± 10.3 years) and was successful in 120 (96.8%) patients. All failed cases were due to the failure of cannulation of the right adrenal vein. The first-attempt success rate was 94.3% (117 of 124 patients) and increased from 83.9% in the first 31 patients to 100% in the last 31 patients. Similarly, the overall success rate increased from 93.5% to 100%. The right SI was significantly higher than the left one (26.4 vs. 11.0, p < 0.0001). Both indices did not differ across quartiles of patients. No complications occurred during the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The AVS procedure, preceded by adrenal CT, may be implemented into daily diagnostic practice safely with an excellent success rate.

Consensus Document of the International Union of Angiology (IUA)-2013. Current concept on the management of arterio-venous management

Arterio-venous malformations (AVMs) are congenital vascular malformations (CVMs) that result from birth defects involving the vessels of both arterial and venous origins, resulting in direct communications between the different size vessels or a meshwork of primitive reticular networks of dysplastic minute vessels which have failed to mature to become 'capillary' vessels termed "nidus". These lesions are defined by shunting of high velocity, low resistance flow from the arterial vasculature into the venous system in a variety of fistulous conditions. A systematic classification system developed by various groups of experts (Hamburg classification, ISSVA classification, Schobinger classification, angiographic classification of AVMs,) has resulted in a better understanding of the biology and natural history of these lesions and improved management of CVMs and AVMs. The Hamburg classification, based on the embryological differentiation between extratruncular and truncular type of lesions, allows the determination of the potential of progression and recurrence of these lesions. The majority of all AVMs are extra-truncular lesions with persistent proliferative potential, whereas truncular AVM lesions are exceedingly rare. Regardless of the type, AV shunting may ultimately result in significant anatomical, pathophysiological and hemodynamic consequences. Therefore, despite their relative rarity (10-20% of all CVMs), AVMs remain the most challenging and potentially limb or life-threatening form of vascular anomalies. The initial diagnosis and assessment may be facilitated by non- to minimally invasive investigations such as duplex ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), MR angiography (MRA), computerized tomography (CT) and CT angiography (CTA). Arteriography remains the diagnostic gold standard, and is required for planning subsequent treatment. A multidisciplinary team approach should be utilized to integrate surgical and non-surgical interventions for optimum care. Currently available treatments are associated with significant risk of complications and morbidity. However, an early aggressive approach to elimiate the nidus (if present) may be undertaken if the benefits exceed the risks. Trans-arterial coil embolization or ligation of feeding arteries where the nidus is left intact, are incorrect approaches and may result in proliferation of the lesion. Furthermore, such procedures would prevent future endovascular access to the lesions via the arterial route. Surgically inaccessible, infiltrating, extra-truncular AVMs can be treated with endovascular therapy as an independent modality. Among various embolo-sclerotherapy agents, ethanol sclerotherapy produces the best long term outcomes with minimum recurrence. However, this procedure requires extensive training and sufficient experience to minimize complications and associated morbidity. For the surgically accessible lesions, surgical resection may be the treatment of choice with a chance of optimal control. Preoperative sclerotherapy or embolization may supplement the subsequent surgical excision by reducing the morbidity (e.g. operative bleeding) and defining the lesion borders. Such a combined approach may provide an excellent potential for a curative result. Conclusion. AVMs are high flow congenital vascular malformations that may occur in any part of the body. The clinical presentation depends on the extent and size of the lesion and can range from an asymptomatic birthmark to congestive heart failure. Detailed investigations including duplex ultrasound, MRI/MRA and CT/CTA are required to develop an appropriate treatment plan. Appropriate management is best achieved via a multi-disciplinary approach and interventions should be undertaken by appropriately trained physicians.

The Adrenal Vein Sampling International Study (AVIS) for identifying the major subtypes of primary aldosteronism

CONTEXT

In patients who seek surgical cure of primary aldosteronism (PA), The Endocrine Society Guidelines recommend the use of adrenal vein sampling (AVS), which is invasive, technically challenging, difficult to interpret, and commonly held to be risky.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the complication rate of AVS and the ways in which it is performed and interpreted at major referral centers.

DESIGN AND SETTINGS

The Adrenal Vein Sampling International Study is an observational, retrospective, multicenter study conducted at major referral centers for endocrine hypertension worldwide.

PARTICIPANTS

Eligible centers were identified from those that had published on PA and/or AVS in the last decade.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The protocols, interpretation, and costs of AVS were measured, as well as the rate of adrenal vein rupture and the rate of use of AVS.

RESULTS

Twenty of 24 eligible centers from Asia, Australia, North America, and Europe participated and provided information on 2604 AVS studies over a 6-yr period. The percentage of PA patients systematically submitted to AVS was 77% (median; 19-100%, range). Thirteen of the 20 centers used sequential catheterization, and seven used bilaterally simultaneous catheterization; cosyntropin stimulation was used in 11 centers. The overall rate of adrenal vein rupture was 0.61%. It correlated directly with the number of AVS performed at a particular center (P = 0.002) and inversely with the number of AVS performed by each radiologist (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite carrying a minimal risk of adrenal vein rupture and at variance with the guidelines, AVS is not used systematically at major referral centers worldwide. These findings represent an argument for defining guidelines for this clinically important but technically demanding procedure.

The value of chest computer tomography and cervical mediastinoscopy in the preoperative assessment of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

Patients with localized malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) can be considered for surgical resection with or without additional treatment. For this approach it is imperative to select patients without mediastinal lymph node involvement. In this study cervical mediastinoscopy (CM) is compared with computer tomography (CT) scanning for its diagnostic accuracy in assessing mediastinal lymph nodes during preoperative workup.

METHODS

Computer tomography scans of the chest and CM were performed in 43 patients with proven unilateral MPM. The CT scans were reviewed by one radiologist and two chest physicians. At CM the lymph node samples were taken from stations Naruke 2, 3, 4, and 7. Computer tomography and CM results were compared with final histopathologic findings obtained at thoracotomy or, if this was not performed, at CM.

RESULTS

Computer tomography scanning revealed pathologic enlarged lymph nodes with a shortest diameter of at least 10 mm in 17 of 43 patients (39%). There was histopathologic evidence of lymph node metastases at CM in 11 of these patients (26%). This resulted in a sensitivity of 60% and 80%, a specificity of 71% and 100%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 67% and 93% for CT and CM, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical mediastinoscopy is a valuable diagnostic procedure for patients with MPM who are considered candidates for surgical-based therapy. Results of CM are more reliable than those obtained by CT scanning. Our data confirm results of previous studies reporting that mediastinal lymph node involvement is a frequent event in MPM.

Low-dose gadobenate dimeglumine versus standard dose gadopentetate dimeglumine for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: an intra-individual crossover comparison

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) has a two-fold higher T1 relaxivity compared with gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) and can be used for both dynamic and delayed liver MRI. This intraindividual, crossover study was conducted to compare 0.05 mmol/kg Gd-BOPTA with 0.1 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA for liver MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-one patients underwent two identical MR examinations separated by >or= 72 hours. Precontrast T1-FLASH-2D and T2-TSE sequences and postcontrast T1-FLASH-2D sequences were acquired during the dynamic and delayed (1-2 hours) phases after each contrast injection. Images were evaluated on-site by two independent, blinded off-site readers in terms of confidence for lesion detection, lesion number, character and diagnosis, enhancement pattern, lesion-to-liver contrast, and benefit of dynamic and delayed scans. Additional on-site evaluation was performed of the overall diagnostic value of each agent.

RESULTS

Superior diagnostic confidence was noted by on-site investigators and off-site assessors 1 and 2 for 6, 4 and 2 patients with Gd-BOPTA, and for 3, 1 and 2 patients with Gd-DTPA, respectively. No consistent differences were noted for other parameters on dynamic phase images whereas greater lesion-to-liver contrast was noted for more patients on delayed images after Gd-BOPTA. More correct diagnoses of histologically confirmed lesions (n = 26) were made with the complete Gd-BOPTA image set than with the complete Gd-DTPA set (reader 1: 68% vs. 59%; reader 2: 78% vs. 68%). The overall diagnostic value was considered superior after Gd-BOPTA in seven patients and after Gd-DTPA in one patient.

CONCLUSION

The additional diagnostic information on delayed imaging, combined with the possibility to use a lower overall dose to obtain similar diagnostic information on dynamic imaging, offers a distinct clinical advantage for Gd-BOPTA for liver MRI.

Low-dose gadobenate dimeglumine versus standard dose gadopentetate dimeglumine for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: an intra-individual crossover comparison

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) has a two-fold higher T1 relaxivity compared with gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) and can be used for both dynamic and delayed liver MRI. This intraindividual, crossover study was conducted to compare 0.05 mmol/kg Gd-BOPTA with 0.1 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA for liver MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-one patients underwent two identical MR examinations separated by >or= 72 hours. Precontrast T1-FLASH-2D and T2-TSE sequences and postcontrast T1-FLASH-2D sequences were acquired during the dynamic and delayed (1-2 hours) phases after each contrast injection. Images were evaluated on-site by two independent, blinded off-site readers in terms of confidence for lesion detection, lesion number, character and diagnosis, enhancement pattern, lesion-to-liver contrast, and benefit of dynamic and delayed scans. Additional on-site evaluation was performed of the overall diagnostic value of each agent.

RESULTS

Superior diagnostic confidence was noted by on-site investigators and off-site assessors 1 and 2 for 6, 4 and 2 patients with Gd-BOPTA, and for 3, 1 and 2 patients with Gd-DTPA, respectively. No consistent differences were noted for other parameters on dynamic phase images whereas greater lesion-to-liver contrast was noted for more patients on delayed images after Gd-BOPTA. More correct diagnoses of histologically confirmed lesions (n = 26) were made with the complete Gd-BOPTA image set than with the complete Gd-DTPA set (reader 1: 68% vs. 59%; reader 2: 78% vs. 68%). The overall diagnostic value was considered superior after Gd-BOPTA in seven patients and after Gd-DTPA in one patient.

CONCLUSION

The additional diagnostic information on delayed imaging, combined with the possibility to use a lower overall dose to obtain similar diagnostic information on dynamic imaging, offers a distinct clinical advantage for Gd-BOPTA for liver MRI.

Renal artery stenosis: endovascular flow wire study for validation of Doppler US

PURPOSE

To compare the accuracy of proximal and peripheral Doppler parameters for detection of renal artery stenosis (RAS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors obtained absolute velocities and peripheral Doppler waveforms in 16 stenotic and 14 normal renal arteries by using a 0.45-mm endovascular flow wire. Hemodynamically significant stenosis was established by measuring transstenotic invasive pressure gradients, with a 10 mm Hg or greater pressure drop indicating RAS. Accuracy of the Doppler parameters and of digital subtraction angiographic (DSA) results were compared by using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

Measurements of absolute velocities at the site of the stenosis (maximal peak systolic velocity [PSVmax], PSV ratio, renal artery-to-aortic PVS ratio) showed high accuracy for diagnosis of RAS similar to that of DSA (areas under the ROC curve were 0.96, 0.97, 0.93, respectively). The distal intrarenal Doppler indexes (notably loss of early systolic peak, acceleration, acceleration time, pulsatility index, and resistive index) did not show statistically significant correlation with RAS.

CONCLUSION

Doppler measurements in the main renal artery correlate well with RAS. The intrarenal Doppler spectrum, however, has no diagnostic value. The authors conclude that duplex Doppler US is not a suitable screening test for RAS.