1
|
McPartland C, Salib A, Banks J, Mark JR, Lallas CD, Trabulsi EJ, Gomella LG, Goldberg H, Leiby B, Den R, Chandrasekar T. Risk of Secondary Malignancies After Pelvic Radiation: A Population-based Analysis. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 63:52-61. [PMID: 38558762 PMCID: PMC10979055 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective Radiation therapy has increasingly been used in the management of pelvic malignancies. However, the use of radiation continues to pose a risk of a secondary malignancy to its recipients. This study investigates the risk of secondary malignancy development following radiation for primary pelvic malignancies. Methods A retrospective cohort review of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 1975 to 2016 was performed. Primary pelvic malignancies were subdivided based on the receipt of radiation, and secondary malignancies were stratified as pelvic or nonpelvic to investigate the local effect of radiation. Key findings and limitations A total of 2 102 192 patients were analyzed (1 189 108 with prostate, 315 026 with bladder, 88 809 with cervical, 249 535 with uterine, and 259 714 with rectal/anal cancer). The incidence rate (defined as cases per 1000 person years) of any secondary malignancies (including but not limited to secondary pelvic malignancies) was higher in radiation patients than in nonradiation patients (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.04, confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.05), with significantly greater rates noted in radiation patients with prostate (IRR 1.22, CI 1.21-1.24), uterine (IRR 1.34), and cervical (IRR 1.80, CI 1.72-1.88) cancer. While the overall incidence rate of any secondary pelvic malignancy was lower in radiation patients (IRR 0.79, CI 0.78-0.81), a greater incidence was still noted in the same cohorts including radiation patients with prostate (IRR 1.42, CI 1.39-1.45), uterine (IRR 1.15, CI 1.08-1.21), and cervical (IRR 1.72, CI 1.59-1.86) cancer. Conclusions and clinical implications Except for localized cervical cancer, when put in the context of median overall survival, the impact of radiation likely does not carry enough weight to change practice patterns. Radiation for pelvic malignancies increases the risk for several secondary malignancies, and more specifically, secondary pelvic malignancies, but with a relatively low absolute risk of secondary malignancies, the benefits of radiation warrant continued use for most pelvic malignancies. Practice changes should be considered for radiation utilization in malignancies with excellent cancer-specific survival such as cervical cancer. Patient summary The use of radiation for the management of pelvic malignancies induces a risk of secondary malignancies to its recipients. However, the absolute risk being low, the benefits of radiation warrant its continued use, and a change in practice patterns is unlikely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Connor McPartland
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Urology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Andrew Salib
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joshua Banks
- Division of Biostatistics, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - James R. Mark
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Costas D. Lallas
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Leonard G. Gomella
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hanan Goldberg
- Department of Urology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, NY, USA
| | - Benjamin Leiby
- Division of Biostatistics, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Robert Den
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Thenappan Chandrasekar
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Urology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gomella LG. Is PSMA PET disrupting traditional prostate cancer staging and treatment? Can J Urol 2024; 31:11814-11815. [PMID: 38642457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
|
3
|
Loeb S, Keith SW, Cheng HH, Leader AE, Gross L, Sanchez Nolasco T, Byrne N, Hartman R, Brown LH, Pieczonka CM, Gomella LG, Kelly WK, Lallas CD, Handley N, Mille PJ, Mark JR, Brown GA, Chopra S, McClellan A, Wise DR, Hollifield L, Giri VN. TARGET: A Randomized, Noninferiority Trial of a Pretest, Patient-Driven Genetic Education Webtool Versus Genetic Counseling for Prostate Cancer Germline Testing. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2300552. [PMID: 38452310 PMCID: PMC10939575 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Germline genetic testing (GT) is important for prostate cancer (PCA) management, clinical trial eligibility, and hereditary cancer risk. However, GT is underutilized and there is a shortage of genetic counselors. To address these gaps, a patient-driven, pretest genetic education webtool was designed and studied compared with traditional genetic counseling (GC) to inform strategies for expanding access to genetic services. METHODS Technology-enhanced acceleration of germline evaluation for therapy (TARGET) was a multicenter, noninferiority, randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04447703) comparing a nine-module patient-driven genetic education webtool versus pretest GC. Participants completed surveys measuring decisional conflict, satisfaction, and attitudes toward GT at baseline, after pretest education/counseling, and after GT result disclosure. The primary end point was noninferiority in reducing decisional conflict between webtool and GC using the validated Decisional Conflict Scale. Mixed-effects regression modeling was used to compare decisional conflict between groups. Participants opting for GT received a 51-gene panel, with results delivered to participants and their providers. RESULTS The analytic data set includes primary outcome data from 315 participants (GC [n = 162] and webtool [n = 153]). Mean difference in decisional conflict score changes between groups was -0.04 (one-sided 95% CI, -∞ to 2.54; P = .01), suggesting the patient-driven webtool was noninferior to GC. Overall, 145 (89.5%) GC and 120 (78.4%) in the webtool arm underwent GT, with pathogenic variants in 15.8% (8.7% in PCA genes). Satisfaction did not differ significantly between arms; knowledge of cancer genetics was higher but attitudes toward GT were less favorable in the webtool arm. CONCLUSION The results of the TARGET study support the use of patient-driven digital webtools for expanding access to pretest genetic education for PCA GT. Further studies to optimize patient experience and evaluate them in diverse patient populations are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy Loeb
- Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
- Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery/Urology, Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY
| | - Scott W. Keith
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Heather H. Cheng
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Amy E. Leader
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Laura Gross
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT
- Yale New Haven Health, New Haven, CT
| | - Tatiana Sanchez Nolasco
- Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
- Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery/Urology, Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY
| | - Nataliya Byrne
- Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
- Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery/Urology, Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY
| | - Rebecca Hartman
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Leonard G. Gomella
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - William Kevin Kelly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Costas D. Lallas
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Nathan Handley
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Integrative Medicine and Nutritional Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - James Ryan Mark
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | - David R. Wise
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | | | - Veda N. Giri
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ross AE, Zhang J, Huang HC, Yamashita R, Keim-Malpass J, Simko JP, DeVries S, Morgan TM, Souhami L, Dobelbower MC, McGinnis LS, Jones CU, Dess RT, Zeitzer KL, Choi K, Hartford AC, Michalski JM, Raben A, Gomella LG, Sartor AO, Rosenthal SA, Sandler HM, Spratt DE, Pugh SL, Mohamad O, Esteva A, Chen E, Schaeffer EM, Tran PT, Feng FY. External Validation of a Digital Pathology-based Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Architecture in the NRG/RTOG 9902 Phase 3 Trial. Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00029-4. [PMID: 38302323 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Revised: 12/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate risk stratification is critical to guide management decisions in localized prostate cancer (PCa). Previously, we had developed and validated a multimodal artificial intelligence (MMAI) model generated from digital histopathology and clinical features. Here, we externally validate this model on men with high-risk or locally advanced PCa treated and followed as part of a phase 3 randomized control trial. OBJECTIVE To externally validate the MMAI model on men with high-risk or locally advanced PCa treated and followed as part of a phase 3 randomized control trial. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Our validation cohort included 318 localized high-risk PCa patients from NRG/RTOG 9902 with available histopathology (337 [85%] of the 397 patients enrolled into the trial had available slides, of which 19 [5.6%] failed due to poor image quality). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Two previously locked prognostic MMAI models were validated for their intended endpoint: distant metastasis (DM) and PCa-specific mortality (PCSM). Individual clinical factors and the number of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) high-risk features served as comparators. Subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) was reported per standard deviation increase of the score with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) using Fine-Gray or Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The DM and PCSM MMAI algorithms were significantly and independently associated with the risk of DM (sHR [95% CI] = 2.33 [1.60-3.38], p < 0.001) and PCSM, respectively (sHR [95% CI] = 3.54 [2.38-5.28], p < 0.001) when compared against other prognostic clinical factors and NCCN high-risk features. The lower 75% of patients by DM MMAI had estimated 5- and 10-yr DM rates of 4% and 7%, and the highest quartile had average 5- and 10-yr DM rates of 19% and 32%, respectively (p < 0.001). Similar results were observed for the PCSM MMAI algorithm. CONCLUSIONS We externally validated the prognostic ability of MMAI models previously developed among men with localized high-risk disease. MMAI prognostic models further risk stratify beyond the clinical and pathological variables for DM and PCSM in a population of men already at a high risk for disease progression. This study provides evidence for consistent validation of our deep learning MMAI models to improve prognostication and enable more informed decision-making for patient care. PATIENT SUMMARY This paper presents a novel approach using images from pathology slides along with clinical variables to validate artificial intelligence (computer-generated) prognostic models. When implemented, clinicians can offer a more personalized and tailored prognostic discussion for men with localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley E Ross
- Department of Urology, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | - Jeffry P Simko
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sandy DeVries
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Luis Souhami
- The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Kwang Choi
- Brooklyn MB-CCOP/SUNY Downstate, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Adam Raben
- Christiana Care Health Services, Inc. CCOP, Wilmington, DE, USA
| | | | - A Oliver Sartor
- Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | | | | | - Daniel E Spratt
- UH Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Stephanie L Pugh
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center and American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Osama Mohamad
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Felix Y Feng
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gomella LG. The Left Shift in Drugs for Advanced Prostate Cancer. Can J Urol 2023; 30:11708-11709. [PMID: 38104326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
|
6
|
Gomella LG. Prostate cancer screening algorithms and the Affordable Care Act updates. Can J Urol 2023; 30:11644. [PMID: 37838989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
|
7
|
Gomella LG. Re: Venture capital investment in urology, 2011 to mid-2021. Can J Urol 2023; 30:11667. [PMID: 37838993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
|
8
|
Gomella LG. The Bladder and the Bowel: More Than Just Neighbors. Can J Urol 2023; 30:11583. [PMID: 37633283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
|
9
|
Sartor O, Karrison TG, Sandler HM, Gomella LG, Amin MB, Purdy J, Michalski JM, Garzotto MG, Pervez N, Balogh AG, Rodrigues GB, Souhami L, Reaume MN, Williams SG, Hannan R, Jones CU, Horwitz EM, Rodgers JP, Feng FY, Rosenthal SA. Androgen Deprivation and Radiotherapy with or Without Docetaxel for Localized High-risk Prostate Cancer: Long-term Follow-up from the Randomized NRG Oncology RTOG 0521 Trial. Eur Urol 2023; 84:156-163. [PMID: 37179241 PMCID: PMC10662642 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intensification of therapy may improve outcomes for patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE To provide long-term follow-up data from phase III RTOG 0521, which compared a combination of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) + external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) + docetaxel with ADT + EBRT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS High-risk localized prostate cancer patients (>50% of patients had Gleason 9-10 disease) were prospectively randomized to 2 yr of ADT + EBRT or ADT + EBRT + six cycles of docetaxel. A total of 612 patients were accrued, and 563 were eligible and included in the modified intent-to-treat analysis. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Analyses with Cox proportional hazards were performed as prespecified in the protocol; however, there was evidence of nonproportional hazards. Thus, a post hoc analysis was performed using the restricted mean survival time (RMST). The secondary endpoints included biochemical failure, distant metastasis (DM) as detected by conventional imaging, and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS After 10.4 yr of median follow-up among survivors, the hazard ratio (HR) for OS was 0.89 (90% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-1.14; one-sided log-rank p = 0.22). Survival at 10 yr was 64% for ADT + EBRT and 69% for ADT + EBRT + docetaxel. The RMST at 12 yr was 0.45 yr and not statistically significant (one-sided p = 0.053). No differences were detected in the incidence of DFS (HR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.73-1.14), DM (HR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-1.14), or prostate-specific antigen recurrence risk (HR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.74-1.29). Two patients had grade 5 toxicity in the chemotherapy arm and zero patients in the control arm. CONCLUSIONS After a median follow-up of 10.4 yr among surviving patients, no significant differences are observed in clinical outcomes between the experimental and control arms. These data suggest that docetaxel should not be used for high-risk localized prostate cancer. Additional research may be warranted using novel predictive biomarkers. PATIENT SUMMARY No significant differences in survival were noted after long-term follow-up for high-risk localized prostate cancer patients in a large prospective trial where patients were treated with androgen deprivation therapy + radiation to the prostate ± docetaxel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Sartor
- Tulane University Health Services Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.
| | - Theodore G Karrison
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Chicago, IL and Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Mahul B Amin
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - James Purdy
- UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - M Neil Reaume
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Raquibul Hannan
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Christopher U Jones
- Sutter Cancer Center (accruals under Radiological Associates of Sacramento), Sacramento, CA, USA
| | | | - Joseph P Rodgers
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Chicago, IL and Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Seth A Rosenthal
- Sutter Cancer Center (accruals under Radiological Associates of Sacramento), Sacramento, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gomella LG. Medications That Scare Me: Urology's Turn. Can J Urol 2023; 30:11520-11521. [PMID: 37344460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
|
11
|
Mark JR, Gomella LG, Lallas CD, Smentkowski KE, Calvaresi A, Handley N, Den RB, Mille P, Tester WJ, Hoffman-Censits J, Dicker AP, Klonicke E, Halpern E, McCue P, Kelly WK, Trabulsi EJ. Enhancing bladder cancer care through the multidisciplinary clinic approach. Can J Urol 2023; 30:11526-11531. [PMID: 37344462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To report the impact of our 25-year multidisciplinary care delivery model experience on patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer treated at our National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson University. To our knowledge, our multidisciplinary genitourinary cancer clinic (MDC) is the longest continuously operating center of its kind at an NCI Cancer Center in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS We selected a recent group of patients with cT2-4 N0-1 M0 bladder cancer seen in the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Genitourinary Oncology MDC from January 2016 to September 2019. These patients were identified retrospectively. SEER-18 (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database, November 2019 submission was queried to obtain patients with similarly staged disease diagnosed between 2015 and 2017. Completion rates of radical cystectomy, use of neoadjuvant therapies, and survival outcomes were compared between the two cohorts. RESULTS Ninety-one patients from the MDC form this time period were identified; 65.9% underwent radical cystectomy and 71.8% received neoadjuvant therapy in the form of chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibition or a combination of the two - higher than reported national trends for neoadjuvant therapies. Progression of disease was seen in 24.2% of patients. A total of 8675 patients met inclusion criteria in the SEER database. Rates of radical cystectomy were significantly higher in MCD patients when compared to SEER derived data (65.9% vs. 37.7%, p =< 0.001). MCD patients had significantly better cancer-specific survival (mean 20.4 vs. 18.3 months p = 0.028, median survival not reached). CONCLUSION Our long term experience caring for patients with genitourinary malignancies such as bladder cancer in a uniform multidisciplinary team results in a high utilization of neoadjuvant therapies. When compared to a contemporary SEER-derived cohort, multidisciplinary patients were more likely to undergo radical cystectomy and had longer cancer-specific survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Ryan Mark
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Leonard G Gomella
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Costas D Lallas
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Katherine E Smentkowski
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anne Calvaresi
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nathan Handley
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Robert B Den
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Patrick Mille
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - William J Tester
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jean Hoffman-Censits
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Adam P Dicker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Edward Klonicke
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ethan Halpern
- Department of Pathology and Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Peter McCue
- Department of Pathology and Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - W Kevin Kelly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Edouard J Trabulsi
- Department of Urology, Jefferson-Einstein Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gomella LG. Cardio-Oncology, Nephro-Oncology and the Urologic Oncology Collaboration. Can J Urol 2023; 30:11457-11458. [PMID: 37074741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
|
13
|
Simhal RK, Wang KR, Shah Y, Mark JR, Shah MS, Gomella LG, Lallas CD, Chandrasekar T. Perioperative outcomes of radical prostatectomy for advanced stage, node positive, and metastatic prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
270 Background: Historically, surgical management with radical prostatectomy (RP) has been a definitive treatment option only for localized prostate cancer (PCa). However, recent studies suggest an overall survival benefit to treating the primary tumor with radiation therapy in metastatic PCa (mPCa). Therefore, RP may have a role in treating mPCa, but the perioperative safety of that remains unclear. Here, we aim to compare the perioperative outcomes of RP for locally advanced, node positive, and metastatic PCa using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) database. Methods: RPs performed between 2019-2020 were identified in NSQIP and the corresponding Prostatectomy-Targeted Participant Use File. Cases were grouped into six distinct categories: T1N0M0-T2N0M0; T3N0M0; T4N0M0; T1-3N1M0; T4N1M0; and T1-4N0-1M1. Baseline age, race, and medical comorbidities were compared between the groups. Patients were then further grouped into T1-2N0M0 versus T3-4N0M0 cases to compare the effect of locally advanced disease, TanyN1M0 versus TanyN0M0 to compare the effect of node-positivity, and TanyN0M1 versus TanyN0M0 to compare the effect of metastases. 30-day outcomes, operative time, hospital length-of-stay, 30-day mortality, readmissions, reoperations, major complications, minor complications, and surgery-specific complications were compared between groups. Results: Pathologic staging was available for 5,248 RPs. Baseline demographics were largely similar, with the exceptions of increased Black race, diabetes, and smoking in the node-positive-group and increased age in the T4 group. There was a slightly higher rate of minor complications in the locally advanced (T3-4N0M0) versus localized (T1-2N0M0) group, but no significant difference in major complications, 30-day mortality, readmissions, or rectal injuries. In comparison to node-negative patients (T1-4N0M0), node-positivity (T1-4N1M0) was associated with longer operative time, LOS, and incidence of 30-day renal failure, but was otherwise not associated with a higher rate of any complication. Compared to non-metastatic cases (T1-4N0M0), metastatic cases (T1-4N0M1) were associated with a higher rate of bleeding, prolonged-NG-tube use, ureteral obstruction, and LOS. Conclusions: RP for patients with locally advanced, node positive, and metastatic prostate cancer appears to be safe; it is not associated with significantly higher rates of 30-day mortality or major complications compared to RP for localized prostate cancer. Given the potential survival benefit in treating the primary tumor in advanced disease, there may be a role for RP in treating patients with advanced PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishabh Kumar Simhal
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kerith Ruoyao Wang
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Yash Shah
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - James Ryan Mark
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mihir S Shah
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Leonard G. Gomella
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shah Y, Wang KR, Simhal RK, Goldberg H, Mark JR, Shah MS, Gomella LG, Lallas CD, Chandrasekar T. Predicting perioperative complications for partial versus radical nephrectomy in T1b-T2 renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
737 Background: The standard of care for larger localized RCC lesions is radical (RN) or partial (PN) nephrectomy. RN is increasingly utilized to maximize oncologic benefit in complex tumors. Although PN is a more technically complex procedure, its nephron-sparing nature confers lasting renal and cardiovascular benefits. We utilized the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database to elucidate predictors of perioperative morbidity in T1b-T2 RCC patients. Methods: Using the NSQIP Nephrectomy-Targeted PUF, 2,094 patients undergoing nephrectomy between 2019-2020 for localized T1b-T2 RCC were identified. Variables of interest included surgical procedure and approach, tumor stage, demographics, pre-operative laboratory values, comorbidities, infection and venothromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis techniques, peri-operative complications, operative time, length of hospital stay, 30-day reoperations, and 30-day readmissions. Chi square test was used to analyze univariate associations between certain comorbidities and complications. Multivariate regression analysis was utilized to compare complication rates between PN and RN after adjusting for baseline characteristics and surgical approach. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: 816 patients received PN while 1,278 received RN. PN patients had an increase in the following events: 30-day readmissions (7.0% vs. 4.7%, p=0.026), major bleeds (9.19% vs. 5.56%, p=0.001), renal failure requiring dialysis (1.23% vs. 0.31%, p=0.013), and urine leak or ureteric fistulae (1.10% vs. 0.31%, p=0.025). Open surgery was associated with increased VTE, renal failure, bleeds, urine leaks or ureteric fistulae, readmissions, and reoperations. Multivariate analysis revealed that PN remained predictive of all four aforementioned events, although further adjustment for robotic approach led to a loss of significance for renal failure and ureteric fistulae. Additional patient-specific predictors of relevant complications across procedure type included bleeding disorder and dialysis for bleeds, and renal failure, steroid use, and COPD for readmissions. Conclusions: This is the first study to evaluate the new NSQIP Nephrectomy-Targeted PUF. This population-based cohort provides unique insights into nephrectomy for pT1b-T2 localized RCC. We demonstrate significant associations between PN and specific complications, modulated by particular comorbidities, although both PN and RN were exceedingly safe. This analysis supports the development of novel risk stratification tools which account for specific patient comorbidities in predicting near term risk. Improved understanding of case-specific determinants of morbidity following PN or RN may facilitate shared decision making in localized RCC management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yash Shah
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kerith Ruoyao Wang
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Rishabh Kumar Simhal
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - James Ryan Mark
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mihir S Shah
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Leonard G. Gomella
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Costas D. Lallas
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Simhal RK, Wang KR, Shah Y, Simon DP, Mark JR, Shah MS, Gomella LG, Chandrasekar T, Lallas CD. Risk analysis of open vs. robotic assisted radical cystectomy. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
576 Background: Radical cystectomy (RC) is standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, but it comes with significant perioperative risk with half of patients experiencing major postoperative complications. Robot-assisted radical cystectomies (RARC) have aimed to decrease patient morbidity and have become increasingly adopted in North America. Currently, both open radical cystectomies (ORC) and RARC are frequently performed. To contribute to the existing literature using newly available data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP), representing one of the most recent, largest multi-institutional studies, while uniquely accounting for a variety of factors including type of urinary diversion, cancer staging, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: RC procedures performed between 2019-2020 were identified in NSQIP and the corresponding Cystectomy Targeted database. Cases in the ORC group were planned open procedures, and cases in the RARC group were robotic with intra- or extracorporeal diversions, including unplanned conversion to open cases for intention-to-treat. Chi-square and t-tests were performed to compare baseline demographics and operative parameters. Multivariate analysis was performed for outcomes including major complications, minor complications, and 30-day mortality, while adjusting for operative approach, medical comorbidities, functional status, age, race, sex, BMI, ASA-classification, preoperative labs, type of urinary diversion, pathological staging, prior pelvic surgery or radiation, need for preoperative transfusion, preoperative sepsis, emergent or elective surgery, and recent chemotherapy. Results: 4,022 RC cases were identified. Of these, 3,146 (78.2%) received planned ORC while 876 (21.8%) received RARC. Baseline demographics of the patients who received ORC versus RARC were largely similar, with no significant difference in age or medical comorbidities. RARC was associated with longer operative times and shorter hospital length of stay compared to ORC. On multivariate analysis, ORC was associated with a higher rate of 30-day mortality [OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.3-7.2; p=0.009], reintubation, cardiac arrest, superficial wound infection, bleeding requiring transfusion [OR 4.7; 95%CI 3.6 - 6.1; p<0.001], prolonged postoperative nasogastric tube use, rectal injury, and ureteral fistula or urine leak compared to RARC. Conclusions: In the NSQIP database, ORC is associated with higher rates of 30-day mortality and operative complications, most notably bleeding, compared to RARC. This study is unique in the size of the cohorts compared, the timeliness of the data (2019-2020), and the ability to control for factors, such as type of urinary diversion, pathological bladder cancer staging, and use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishabh Kumar Simhal
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kerith Ruoyao Wang
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Yash Shah
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Daniel P Simon
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - James Ryan Mark
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mihir S Shah
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Leonard G. Gomella
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Costas D. Lallas
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Simhal RK, Wang KR, Shah Y, Ragam R, Simon DP, Mark JR, Gomella LG, Lallas CD, Shah MS. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on 30-day radical cystectomy outcomes. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
575 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), often with a cisplatin-based regimen, is recommended before radical cystectomy (RC), as studies have shown a modest survival benefit. However, NAC may confer toxicity and augment preoperative frailty, affecting perioperative outcomes. We investigated the relationship between NAC and 30-day RC outcomes using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). Methods: RCs performed between 2019-2020 were identified in NSQIP and the corresponding cystectomy-targeted database. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and operative parameters were compared via Pearson’s chi-square and t-tests between patients who received NAC before RC and RC alone (RCA) groups. Patient frailty was compared using the NSQIP frailty index (mFI-5), a validated 5-item score including points for diabetes, functional status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, and hypertension. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare outcomes, adjusting for age, race, robotic or open approach, urinary diversion type, comorbidities, ASA classification, and functional status. Minor complications included superficial SSI, pneumonia, UTI, bleeding requiring transfusion, AKI, or C.diff infection. Major 30-day complications included sepsis, DVT, stroke, reintubation, renal failure, MI, PE, septic shock, wound dehiscence, deep wound infection, cardiac arrest, readmission, reoperation, or mortality. All statistical tests were two tailed, p<0.05 considered significant. Results: 4,482 RCs were identified. Of these, 1889 (42%) patients received NAC. Compared to RCA, NAC patients were younger (66.9 years vs 70.4 years, p<0.001), had higher rates of white race, being functionally independent, preoperative weight loss, and cigarette use. NAC also had lower ASA class, fewer comorbidities, and lower frailty (mFI-5 0.8 vs 0.9, p<0.001). Compared to RCA, NAC patients had more robotic cystectomies (23% vs 19%, p=0.0003), received more continent diversions, had a shorter length of stay (7.1 vs 7.8 days, p<0.001), and more commonly had pT0 tumors compared to RCA (18.4% vs 5.9%, p<0.001). On MVA, NAC patients had higher rates of minor complications, most notably increased bleeding requiring transfusion [OR 1.8; 95%CI 1.6-2.1; p<0.001]. There was no difference in major complications between NAC and RCA, except NAC was associated with higher rates of sepsis [OR 1.4; 95%CI 1.1-1.8; p=0.003]. There was no difference in 30-day need for reoperation, readmission, or mortality. Conclusions: In the largest study to date on this topic, we found that NAC for RC is often given to younger, healthier patients, and is not associated with higher rates of major complications or mortality. NAC is associated with higher rates of bleeding and sepsis, which may be related to the immunosuppressive effects of chemotherapeutics. Providers should discuss with patients the benefits and risks of NAC before RC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishabh Kumar Simhal
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kerith Ruoyao Wang
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Yash Shah
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Radhika Ragam
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Daniel P Simon
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - James Ryan Mark
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Leonard G. Gomella
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Costas D. Lallas
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mihir S Shah
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Herzog TJ, Vergote I, Gomella LG, Milenkova T, French T, Tonikian R, Poehlein C, Hussain M. Testing for homologous recombination repair or homologous recombination deficiency for poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors: A current perspective. Eur J Cancer 2023; 179:136-146. [PMID: 36563604 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) have demonstrated clinical activity in patients with BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutated breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancers. Notably, BRCA mutations are associated with defects in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway. This homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) phenotype can also be observed as genomic instability in tumour cells. Accordingly, PARPi sensitivity has been observed in various tumours with HRD, independent of BRCA mutations. Currently, four PARPis are approved by regulatory agencies for the treatment of cancer across multiple tumour types. Most indications are specific to tumours with a confirmed BRCA mutation, mutations in other HRR-related genes, HRD evidenced by genomic instability, or evidence of platinum sensitivity. Regulatory agencies have also approved companion and complementary diagnostics to facilitate patient selection for each PARPi indication. This review aims to summarise the biological basis, clinical validation, and clinical relevance of the available diagnostic methods and assays to assess HRD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas J Herzog
- University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 234 Goodman St, Cincinnati, OH 45219, USA.
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium, European Union
| | - Leonard G Gomella
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center-Jefferson University Health, 1025 Walnut St Suite 1100, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | | | - Tim French
- AstraZeneca, 316 Hills Rd, Cambridge CB2 8PA, UK
| | - Raffi Tonikian
- Merck & Co., Inc., 90 E Scott Ave, Rahway, NJ 07065, USA
| | | | - Maha Hussain
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, 420 E Superior St, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gomella LG. RVU-itis: Is There A Cure? Can J Urol 2022; 29:11340-11341. [PMID: 36495572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Leonard G Gomella
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Foss H, Ragam R, Kelly WK, Gomella LG. Neuroendocrine transformation of prostate adenocarcinoma with corpora cavernosa metastases. Can J Urol 2022; 29:11399-11401. [PMID: 36495584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
We report the case of a 61-year-old male with metastatic prostate cancer who presented with urinary retention secondary to subdermal penile and corpora cavernosa metastases with neuroendocrine transformation of his metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer. We highlight the presentation, diagnosis, and management of this rare condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Halle Foss
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Radhika Ragam
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - W Kevin Kelly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Leonard G Gomella
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gomella LG. The Rise of Self-Service Health Care in Urology and Other Specialties. Can J Urol 2022; 29:11270-11271. [PMID: 36245194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Leonard G Gomella
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
D'Amico MJ, Foss H, Uhr A, Rudnick B, Kloniecke E, Gomella LG. Hemorrhagic cystitis: a review of the literature and treatment options. Can J Urol 2022; 29:11276-11283. [PMID: 36245196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) is a morbid condition for patients and can be challenging for urologists to manage. There are many potential contributing etiologies and the severity of bleeding can be variable. It is important to consider each clinical scenario when formulating management strategies in order to provide the highest quality of care to patients. We provide a review of the literature including diagnosis and treatment options. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a literature search on PubMed using the following keywords: hemorrhagic cystitis, cystitis, gross hematuria, intractable hematuria. We considered all available published articles with no specific inclusion or exclusion criteria for the purposes of this review. RESULTS We reviewed a total of 41 articles and identified a broad differential diagnosis for intractable hemorrhagic cystitis including infection, chemical exposure, malignancy, nephropathy, trauma, radiation therapy, and idiopathic etiology. Depending on the severity of bleeding, many treatments have been described. These range from conservative strategies (bladder fulguration and continuous irrigation) to more extreme and morbid therapies (intravesical instillations, embolization, and urinary diversion). CONCLUSION Hemorrhagic cystitis is a relatively common and can be a difficult condition to manage for urologists. It is important to understand the etiology and available treatments options in order to best treat our patients. We provide a comprehensive and thorough review of the literature and propose a stepwise treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria J D'Amico
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Halle Foss
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alex Uhr
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Benjamin Rudnick
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Edward Kloniecke
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Leonard G Gomella
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chandrasekar T, Clark CB, Gomella A, Wessner CE, Wang S, Nam K, Liu JB, Forsberg F, Lyshchik A, Halpern E, Mark JR, Lallas CD, Gomella LG, Kania L, Trabulsi EJ, Eisenbrey JR. Volumetric Quantitative Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography Evaluation of Complex Renal Cysts: An Adjunctive Metric to the Bosniak Classification System to Predict Malignancy. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 9:336-344. [PMID: 36319560 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of complex renal cysts is guided by the Bosniak classification system, which may be inadequate for risk stratification of patients for intervention. Fractional tumor vascularity (FV) calculated from volumetric contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) images may provide additional useful information. OBJECTIVE To evaluate CEUS and FV calculation for risk stratification of patients with complex renal cysts. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a pilot prospective study with institutional review board approval involving patients undergoing surgery for Bosniak IIF-IV complex renal cysts. CEUS was performed preoperatively on the day of surgery with two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) imaging and sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres as the ultrasound contrast agent. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS A custom MATLAB program was used to select regions of interest on CEUS scans. FV was calculated according to FV = 1 - (total nonenhancing area/total lesion area). We assessed the ability of 2D- and 3D-derived percentage FV (2DFV%, and 3DFV%) and Bosniak classification schemes (pre-2019 [P2019B] and post-2019 [B2019]) to predict malignancy, aggressive histology, and upstaging on surgical pathology. Performance was assessed as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Twenty eligible patients were included in final analysis, of whom 85% (n = 17) had Bosniak IV cysts and 85% (n = 17) had malignant disease on final pathology. Four (24%) of the malignant lesions were International Society of Urological Pathology grade 3-4. The AUC for predicting malignancy was 0.980, 0.824, 0.863, and 0.824 with P2019B, B2019, 2DFV%, and 3DFV%, respectively. When the Bosniak classification was combined with FV%, three models had an AUC of 1, while the combined 2DFV% + B2019 model had AUC of 0.980. CONCLUSIONS FV is a novel metric for evaluating complex cystic renal masses and enhances the ability of the Bosniak classification system to predict malignancy. This metric may serve as an adjunct in risk stratification for surgical intervention. Further prospective evaluation is warranted. PATIENT SUMMARY Cysts in the kidney are currently classified using a scheme called the Bosniak system. We assessed measurement of the percentage of vascular tissue (called fractional vascularity) in cysts on a special type of ultrasound scan. This promising test adds information when combined with the Bosniak system and can help in guiding appropriate treatment.
Collapse
|
23
|
Hall WA, Karrison TG, Rosenthal SA, Amin MB, Gomella LG, Purdy JA, Sartor AO, Michalski JM, Garzotto MG, Bergom C, Jani AB, Lawton CAF, Simko JP, Moore JK, Gore EM, Lee WR, Nguyen PL, Danielson BL, Sandler HM, Feng FY. The Influence of the Pretreatment Immune State on Response to Radiation Therapy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Validation Study From NRG/RTOG 0521. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:266-274. [PMID: 35675855 PMCID: PMC9444930 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.05.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Revised: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The immunoinflammatory state has been shown to be associated with poor outcomes after radiation therapy (RT). We conducted an a priori designed validation study using serum specimens from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0521. It was hypothesized the pretreatment inflammatory state would correlate with clinical outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients on RTOG 0521 had serum banked for biomarker validation. This study was designed to validate previous findings showing an association between elevations in C-reactive protein (CRP) and shorter biochemical disease free survival (bDFS). CRP levels were measured in pretreatment samples. An exploratory panel of related cytokines was also measured including: monocyte chemotactic protein-1, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, interferon-γ, interleukin (IL)-1b, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-17A, IL-23, and tumor necrosis factor. The primary endpoint examined was bDFS. Additional exploratory endpoints included overall survival, distant metastases, and toxicity events attributed to RT. RESULTS Two hundred and two patients in RTOG/NRG 0521 had serum samples available. Median age was 66 years (48-83), and 90% of patients were White. There was not an association between CRP and bDFS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.07 per 1 log increase in CRP; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.38; P = .60). In the exploratory, unplanned analysis, pretreatment IL-10 was significantly associated with worse bDFS (adjusted HR, 1.61 per log increase; P = .0027) and distant metastases (HR, 1.55 per log increase; P = .028). The association of IL-10 with bDFS was maintained on a multiplicity adjustment. The exploratory analyses of pretreatment levels of interferon-γ, IL-1b, IL-2, IL-13, IL-23 were negatively associated with grade 2 or higher pollakiuria (adjusted odds ratio, 0.64, 0.65, 0.71, 0.72, and 0.74, respectively, all P < .05), and IL-6 was negatively associated with grade 2 or higher erectile dysfunction (odds ratio, 0.62; P = .027). CONCLUSIONS Pretreatment CRP was not associated with a poorer bDFS after RT. In a hypothesis- generating analysis, higher baseline levels of IL-10 were associated with lower rates of bDFS. These findings require additional prospective evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William A Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
| | | | - Seth A Rosenthal
- Radiation Oncology Center, Sutter Cancer Centers Radiation Oncology Services
| | - Mahul B Amin
- Department of Pathology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | | | | | - A Oliver Sartor
- Medicine and Urology Departments, Tulane University Health Sciences Center
| | - Jeff M Michalski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine
| | | | - Carmen Bergom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Ashesh B Jani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University Hospital/Winship Cancer Institute
| | - Colleen A F Lawton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Jeffry P Simko
- Department of Pathology, UC San Francisco Medical Center
| | | | - Elizabeth M Gore
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Department of Radiation Oncology, Zablocki Veterans Administration Medical Center
| | - W Robert Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center
| | - Paul L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital
| | | | | | - Felix Y Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UC San Francisco Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Loeb S, Cheng HH, Leader A, Gross L, Nolasco TS, Byrne N, Wise DR, Hollifield L, Brown LH, Slater E, Pieczonka C, Gomella LG, Kelly WK, Trabulsi EJ, Handley N, Lallas CD, Chandrasekar T, Mille P, Mann M, Mark JR, Brown G, Chopra S, Wasserman J, Phillips J, Somers P, Giri VN. Technology-enhanced AcceleRation of Germline Evaluation for Therapy (TARGET): A randomized controlled trial of a pretest patient-driven webtool vs. genetic counseling for prostate cancer germline testing. Contemp Clin Trials 2022; 119:106821. [PMID: 35710085 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Germline testing has an increasingly important role in prostate cancer care. However, a relative shortage of genetic counselors necessitates alternate strategies for delivery of pre-test education for germline testing. This study, funded by the Prostate Cancer Foundation, seeks to address the need for novel methods of delivery of pre-test germline education beyond traditional germline counseling to facilitate informed patient decision-making for germline testing. METHODS This is a two-armed randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a target enrollment of 173 participants with prostate cancer per study arm (total anticipated n = 346). Patients who meet criteria for germline testing based on tumor features, family history or Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry are being recruited from 5 US sites including academic, private practice and Veterans healthcare settings. Consenting participants are randomized to the interactive pretest webtool or germline counseling with assessment of key patient-reported outcomes involved in informed decision-making for germline germline testing. RESULTS Participants complete surveys at baseline, after pretest education/counseling, and following disclosure of germline germline results. The primary outcome of the study is decisional conflict for germline testing. Secondary outcomes include germline knowledge, satisfaction, uptake of germline testing, and understanding of results. CONCLUSION Our hypothesis is that the web-based germline education tool is non-inferior to traditional germline counseling regarding key patient-reported outcomes involved in informed decision-making for germline testing. If proven, the results would support deploying the webtool across various practice settings to facilitate pre-test germlines education for individuals with prostate cancer and developing collaborative care strategies with germline counseling. CLINICALTRIALS gov Identifier: NCT04447703.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy Loeb
- NYU-Langone Health and NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Manhattan Veteran Affairs, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Heather H Cheng
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Amy Leader
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Laura Gross
- Cancer Risk Assessment and Clinical Cancer Germlines, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Tatiana Sanchez Nolasco
- NYU-Langone Health and NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Manhattan Veteran Affairs, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Nataliya Byrne
- NYU-Langone Health and NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Manhattan Veteran Affairs, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - David R Wise
- NYU-Langone Health and NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Lucas Hollifield
- NYU-Langone Health and NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Lauren H Brown
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Elias Slater
- Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica, CA, United States of America
| | | | - Leonard G Gomella
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - William K Kelly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Edouard J Trabulsi
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Nathan Handley
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Costas D Lallas
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Thenappan Chandrasekar
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Patrick Mille
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Mark Mann
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - James Ryan Mark
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Gordon Brown
- New Jersey Urology, Voorhees, NJ, United States of America
| | - Sameer Chopra
- New Jersey Urology, Voorhees, NJ, United States of America
| | - Jenna Wasserman
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Jade Phillips
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Patrick Somers
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Veda N Giri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America; Cancer Risk Assessment and Clinical Cancer Germlines, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America; Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Denisenko A, Mico V, McPartland C, Clark CB, Shumaker A, Gomella PH, Izes J, Mann MJ, Trabulsi EJ, Mark JR, Lallas CD, Gomella LG, Chandrasekar T. Exploring the accuracy of multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer staging: An institutional retrospective study. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.e17056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e17056 Background: Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) has been increasingly utilized in prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and staging. While there is Level 1 data supporting MRI utility in identifying clinically significant PCa and guiding PCa diagnosis, there is little data on its ability to predict surgical outcomes and its utility as a staging study. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of mpMRI in predicting common surgical pathology outcomes in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: Men who underwent either open radical prostatectomy (ORP) or robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) for prostate adenocarcinoma from January-December 2021 at a single tertiary level care academic medical center were identified. Chart review for relevant patient demographics, mpMRI related variables and final surgical pathology was completed. In patients who had pre-operative mpMRI, we evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of mpMRI in predicting relevant surgical outcomes, including presence of pT2N0 organ confined disease (OCD), extracapsular extension (ECE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), lymph node involvement (LNI), and bladder neck invasion (BNI). Results: 168 eligible patients were identified in a 12-month period. The mean age was 63.5±6.24 years and mean Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) was 11.4±23.7, with 166 (98.8%) patients undergoing RALP and 115 (68.5%) having pre-operative mpMRI. Median GGG was 2 in both MRI and CT subsets (p = 0.580), and patients who had pre-op MRI were more likely to have higher PSA (12.7 ±28.1 vs 8.38± 6.32, p = 0.073) and clinically node positive disease (p < 0.001) than those with CT. However, there was no significant difference in final surgical pathology or positive surgical margin rates between these two groups. On subset analysis of the MRI subset, Table summarizes the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of pre-op MRI to predict OCD, ECE, SVI, LNI, and BNI. While specificity of pre-op MRI was adequate for all outcomes (89.1-100%), sensitivity (2.9-49.2%), PPV (40-100%), and NPV (56.3-94.3%) were poor. Conclusions: At present, pre-op MRI of the prostate does not appear to be accurate in its ability to predict important pathologic outcomes at the time of radical prostatectomy and should be used cautiously as a local staging tool. More work is needed before MRI can be used as a reliable staging tool for PCa.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vasil Mico
- Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Connor McPartland
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Cassra B Clark
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Andrew Shumaker
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Joseph Izes
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Edouard John Trabulsi
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - James Ryan Mark
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Costas D. Lallas
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Gomella LG. When is cancer not a cancer? The prostate cancer debate. Can J Urol 2022; 29:11123-11124. [PMID: 35691031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
|
27
|
Pollack A, Karrison TG, Balogh AG, Gomella LG, Low DA, Bruner DW, Wefel JS, Martin AG, Michalski JM, Angyalfi SJ, Lukka H, Faria SL, Rodrigues GB, Beauchemin MC, Lee RJ, Seaward SA, Allen AM, Monitto DC, Seiferheld W, Sartor O, Feng F, Sandler HM. The addition of androgen deprivation therapy and pelvic lymph node treatment to prostate bed salvage radiotherapy (NRG Oncology/RTOG 0534 SPPORT): an international, multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet 2022; 399:1886-1901. [PMID: 35569466 PMCID: PMC9819649 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01790-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In men with a detectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level after prostatectomy for prostate cancer, salvage prostate bed radiotherapy (PBRT) results in about 70% of patients being free of progression at 5 years. A three-group randomised trial was designed to determine whether incremental gains in patient outcomes can be achieved by adding either 4-6 months of short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to PBRT, or both short-term ADT and pelvic lymph node radiotherapy (PLNRT) to PBRT. METHODS The international, multicentre, randomised, controlled SPPORT trial was done at 283 radiation oncology cancer treatment centres in the USA, Canada, and Israel. Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) were those who after prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate had a persistently detectable or an initially undetectable and rising PSA of between 0·1 and 2·0 ng/mL. Patients with and without lymphadenectomy (N0/Nx) were eligible if there was no clinical or pathological evidence of lymph node involvement. Other eligibility criteria included pT2 or pT3 disease, prostatectomy Gleason score of 9 or less, and a Zubrod performance status of 0-1. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive PBRT alone at a dose of 64·8-70·2 Gy at 1·8 Gy per fraction daily (group 1), PBRT plus short-term ADT (group 2), or PLNRT (45 Gy at 1·8 Gy per fraction, and then a volume reduction made to the planning target volume for the remaining 19·8-25 ·2 Gy) plus PBRT plus short-term ADT (group 3). The primary endpoint was freedom from progression, in which progression was defined as biochemical failure according to the Phoenix definition (PSA ≥2 ng/mL over the nadir PSA), clinical failure (local, regional, or distant), or death from any cause. A planned interim analysis of 1191 patents with minimum potential follow-up time of 5 years applied a Haybittle-Peto boundary of p<0·001 (one sided) for comparison of 5-year freedom from progression rates between the treatment groups. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00567580. The primary objectives of the trial have been completed, although long-term follow-up is continuing. FINDINGS Between March 31, 2008, and March 30, 2015, 1792 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the three treatment groups (592 to group 1 [PBRT alone], 602 to group 2 [PBRT plus short-term ADT], and 598 to group 3 [PLNRT plus PBRT plus short-term ADT]). 76 patients subsequently found to be ineligible were excluded from the analyses; thus, the evaluable patient population comprised 1716 patients. At the interim analysis (n=1191 patients; data cutoff May 23, 2018), the Haybittle-Peto boundary for 5-year freedom from progression was exceeded when group 1 was compared with group 3 (difference 17·9%, SE 2·9%; p<0·0001). The difference between groups 2 and 3 did not exceed the boundary (p=0·0063). With additional follow-up beyond the interim analysis (the final planned analysis; data cutoff May 26, 2021), at a median follow-up among survivors of 8·2 years (IQR 6·6-9·4), the 5-year freedom from progression rates in all 1716 eligible patients were 70·9% (95% CI 67·0-74·9) in group 1, 81·3% (78·0-84·6) in group 2, and 87·4% (84·7-90·2) in group 3. Per protocol criteria, freedom from progression in group 3 was superior to groups 1 and 2. Acute (≤3 months after radiotherapy) grade 2 or worse adverse events were significantly more common in group 3 (246 [44%] of 563 patients) than in group 2 (201 [36%] of 563; p=0·0034), which, in turn, were more common than in group 1 (98 [18%] of 547; p<0·0001). Similar findings were observed for grade 3 or worse adverse events. However, late toxicity (>3 months after radiotherapy) did not differ significantly between the groups, apart from more late grade 2 or worse blood or bone marrow events in group 3 versus group 2 (one-sided p=0·0060) attributable to the addition of PLNRT in this group. INTERPRETATION The results of this randomised trial establish the benefit of adding short-term ADT to PBRT to prevent progression in prostate cancer. To our knowledge, these are the first such findings to show that extending salvage radiotherapy to treat the pelvic lymph nodes when combined with short-term ADT results in meaningful reductions in progression after prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer. FUNDING National Cancer Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Pollack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA.
| | - Theodore G Karrison
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; NRG Oncology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Leonard G Gomella
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Daniel A Low
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Deborah W Bruner
- Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, and Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Wefel
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andre-Guy Martin
- CHU de Quebec-Université Laval (L'Hotel-Dieu de Quebec), Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Jeff M Michalski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Steve J Angyalfi
- Tom Baker Cancer Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Himanshu Lukka
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - George B Rodrigues
- Department of Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Marie-Claude Beauchemin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHUM-Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - R Jeffrey Lee
- Intermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Aaron M Allen
- Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Drew C Monitto
- Spartanburg Regional Medical Center, Spartanburg, SC, USA
| | | | - Oliver Sartor
- Department of Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Felix Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA , USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Gomella PT, Mark JR, Giri VN, Kelly WK, Gomella LG. Guidelines on Germline Testing for Urologic Tumor Syndromes. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 8:670-673. [PMID: 35803854 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
In the expanding precision medicine landscape, along with improvements in and the availability of testing, the use of genetics in the evaluation and treatment of patients has increased significantly. Multiple urologic cancers in different organ systems associated with an inherited gene mutation have been described. As these mutations can impact screening and treatment decisions for patients and their families, it is important for providers to be familiar with the current guidelines for germline testing. Here we summarize the current guidelines regarding germline testing for patients with suspected urologic tumor syndromes. PATIENT SUMMARY: Several cancers of the genitourinary tract can be associated with inherited genetic mutations. Knowledge of when to test for these mutations has implications for both treatment and screening of patients and their family members at risk of genitourinary cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick T Gomella
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - James Ryan Mark
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Veda N Giri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - William Kevin Kelly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Leonard G Gomella
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Dylgjeri E, Kothari V, Shafi AA, Semenova G, Gallagher PT, Guan YF, Pang A, Goodwin JF, Irani S, McCann JJ, Mandigo AC, Chand S, McNair CM, Vasilevskaya I, Schiewer MJ, Lallas CD, McCue PA, Gomella LG, Seifert EL, Carroll JS, Butler LM, Holst J, Kelly WK, Knudsen KE. A Novel Role for DNA-PK in Metabolism by Regulating Glycolysis in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:1446-1459. [PMID: 35078861 PMCID: PMC9365345 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-1846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs, herein referred as DNA-PK) is a multifunctional kinase of high cancer relevance. DNA-PK is deregulated in multiple tumor types, including prostate cancer, and is associated with poor outcomes. DNA-PK was previously nominated as a therapeutic target and DNA-PK inhibitors are currently undergoing clinical investigation. Although DNA-PK is well studied in DNA repair and transcriptional regulation, much remains to be understood about the way by which DNA-PK drives aggressive disease phenotypes. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Here, unbiased proteomic and metabolomic approaches in clinically relevant tumor models uncovered a novel role of DNA-PK in metabolic regulation of cancer progression. DNA-PK regulation of metabolism was interrogated using pharmacologic and genetic perturbation using in vitro cell models, in vivo xenografts, and ex vivo in patient-derived explants (PDE). RESULTS Key findings reveal: (i) the first-in-field DNA-PK protein interactome; (ii) numerous DNA-PK novel partners involved in glycolysis; (iii) DNA-PK interacts with, phosphorylates (in vitro), and increases the enzymatic activity of glycolytic enzymes ALDOA and PKM2; (iv) DNA-PK drives synthesis of glucose-derived pyruvate and lactate; (v) DNA-PK regulates glycolysis in vitro, in vivo, and ex vivo; and (vi) combination of DNA-PK inhibitor with glycolytic inhibitor 2-deoxyglucose leads to additive anti-proliferative effects in aggressive disease. CONCLUSIONS Findings herein unveil novel DNA-PK partners, substrates, and function in prostate cancer. DNA-PK impacts glycolysis through direct interaction with glycolytic enzymes and modulation of enzymatic activity. These events support energy production that may contribute to generation and/or maintenance of DNA-PK-mediated aggressive disease phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuela Dylgjeri
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Vishal Kothari
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ayesha A. Shafi
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Galina Semenova
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Peter T. Gallagher
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Yi F. Guan
- School of Medical Sciences and Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Angel Pang
- School of Medical Sciences and Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jonathan F. Goodwin
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Swati Irani
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School and Freemasons Foundation Centre for Male Health and Wellbeing, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Jennifer J. McCann
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Amy C. Mandigo
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Saswati Chand
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Christopher M. McNair
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Irina Vasilevskaya
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew J. Schiewer
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Urology, Medical Oncology and Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Costas D. Lallas
- Department of Urology, Medical Oncology and Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Peter A. McCue
- Department of Urology, Medical Oncology and Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Leonard G. Gomella
- Department of Urology, Medical Oncology and Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Erin L. Seifert
- Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Cell Biology and MitoCare Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jason S. Carroll
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, England, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa M. Butler
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School and Freemasons Foundation Centre for Male Health and Wellbeing, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Jeff Holst
- School of Medical Sciences and Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - William K. Kelly
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Urology, Medical Oncology and Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Karen E. Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Urology, Medical Oncology and Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Mitra AP, Narayan VM, Mokkapati S, Miest T, Boorjian SA, Alemozaffar M, Konety BR, Shore ND, Gomella LG, Kamat AM, Bivalacqua TJ, Montgomery JS, Lerner SP, Busby JE, Poch M, Crispen PL, Steinberg GD, Schuckman AK, Downs TM, Svatek RS, Mashni J, Lane BR, Guzzo TJ, Bratslavsky G, Karsh LI, Woods ME, Brown GA, Canter D, Luchey A, Lotan Y, Krupski T, Inman BA, Williams MB, Cookson MS, Keegan KA, Andriole GL, Sankin AI, Boyd A, O’Donnell MA, Philipson R, Ylä-Herttuala S, Sawutz D, Parker NR, McConkey DJ, Dinney CP. Antiadenovirus Antibodies Predict Response Durability to Nadofaragene Firadenovec Therapy in BCG-unresponsive Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Secondary Analysis of a Phase 3 Clinical Trial. Eur Urol 2022; 81:223-228. [PMID: 34933753 PMCID: PMC8891058 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
A recent phase 3 trial of intravesical nadofaragene firadenovec reported a promising complete response rate for patients with bacillus Calmette-Guérin-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. This study examined the ability of antiadenovirus antibody levels to predict the durability of therapeutic response to nadofaragene firadenovec. A standardized and validated quantitative assay was used to prospectively assess baseline and post-treatment serum antibody levels among 91 patients from the phase 3 trial, of whom 47 (52%) were high-grade recurrence free at 12 mo (responders). While baseline titers did not predict treatment response, 3-mo titer >800 was associated with a higher likelihood of durable response (p = 0.026). Peak post-treatment titers >800 were noted in 42 (89%) responders versus 26 (59%) nonresponders (p = 0.001; assay sensitivity, 89%; negative predictive value, 78%). Moreover, 22 (47%) responders compared with eight (18%) nonresponders had a combination of peak post-treatment titers >800 and peak antibody fold change >8 (p = 0.004; assay specificity, 82%; positive predictive value, 73%). A majority of responders continued to have post-treatment antibody titers >800 after the first 6 mo of therapy. In conclusion, serum antiadenovirus antibody quantification may serve as a novel predictive marker for nadofaragene firadenovec response durability. Future studies will focus on large-scale validation and clinical utility of the assay. PATIENT SUMMARY: This study reports on a planned secondary analysis of a phase 3 multicenter clinical trial that established the benefit of nadofaragene firadenovec, a novel intravesical gene therapeutic, for the treatment of patients with bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-unresponsive high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Prospective assessment of serum anti-human adenovirus type-5 antibody levels of patients in this trial indicated that a combination of post-treatment titers and fold change from baseline can predict treatment efficacy. While this merits additional validation, our findings suggest that serum antiadenovirus antibody levels can serve as an important predictive marker for the durability of therapeutic response to nadofaragene firadenovec.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anirban P. Mitra
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vikram M. Narayan
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sharada Mokkapati
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tanner Miest
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | - Neal D. Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| | - Leonard G. Gomella
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ashish M. Kamat
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Trinity J. Bivalacqua
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Seth P. Lerner
- Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - J. Erik Busby
- Department of Surgery, Prisma Health, University of South Carolina School of Medicine at Greenville, Greenville, SC, USA
| | - Michael Poch
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Paul L. Crispen
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Gary D. Steinberg
- Department of Urology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anne K. Schuckman
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Tracy M. Downs
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Robert S. Svatek
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Joseph Mashni
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ, USA
| | - Brian R. Lane
- Division of Urology, Spectrum Health, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Thomas J. Guzzo
- Division of Urology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Adam Luchey
- Department of Urology, West Virginia University Cancer Institute, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Tracey Krupski
- Department of Urology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Brant A. Inman
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Michael S. Cookson
- Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Kirk A. Keegan
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Gerald L. Andriole
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Alexander I. Sankin
- Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Seppo Ylä-Herttuala
- AI Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | | | - Nigel R. Parker
- AI Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - David J. McConkey
- Department of Urology, Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Colin P.N. Dinney
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA,Corresponding author. Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1373, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Tel. +1-713-792-3250; Fax: +1-713-794-4824, (C.P.N. Dinney)
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Giri VN, Gross L, Russo J, Shimada A, McNair C, Kelly WK, Gomella LG. Prevalence of Fanconi anemia gene mutations among men undergoing multigene germline testing for prostate cancer: Interim results from the EMPOWeR study. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.6_suppl.188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
188 Background: Germline testing for prostate cancer (PCA) is now central to treatment, screening, and hereditary cancer management. The Fanconi anemia (FA) pathway is a key DNA repair pathway involved in PCA biology and treatment. Prevalence of FA genes BRCA2, PALB2, and BRIP1 is well-described; however, multiple other FA genes are not routinely tested, with limited prevalence data. Here we report mutation prevalence of a spectrum of FA genes among men undergoing PCA multigene testing on the Evaluation and Management for Prostate Oncology, Wellness, and Risk (EMPOWeR) study. Methods: Eligibility includes any male with PCA or at-risk for PCA. Multigene testing includes 51 genes; FA pathway genes include BRCA2, PALB2, BRIP1, FANCA, FANCB, FANCC, FANCD2, FANCE, FANCF, FANCG, FANCI, FANCL, and FANCM. Multiple additional cancer risk genes were tested. Fisher’s exact tests were conducted to compare the prevalence of FA gene mutations between participants in the EMPOWeR study vs population prevalence reported in the literature. Statistical significance level of all tests was set a priori to 0.05. Results: The current cohort includes 235 participants. Characteristics are White (83.3%), Black (13.7%), PCA diagnosis (83.4%), mean age of PCA diagnosis 61.7 + 7.69 years, Gleason score >=7 (66.2%), and T3 or higher (29.4%). Genetic results were available for 179 participants. Overall, 11.1% of participants (n=20) had a pathogenic/likely pathogenic mutation identified. Among mutation carriers, 45% (n=9) had mutations in FA genes, including FANCA (n=3), BRCA2 (n=2), FANCM (n=1), FANCD2 (n=1), PALB2 (n=1), and BRIP1 (n=1). Table shows clinical characteristics of participants with mutations in FANCA, FANCM, and FANCD2. Further mutation spectrum included: CHEK2 (n=3), NBN (n=2), MUTYH (n=2), BRCA (n=1), ATM (n=1), HOXB13 (n=1), APC (n=1). Compared to population prevalence, FA mutation prevalence was significantly higher overall (5.0% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.010) and among mutation carriers (45% vs. 0.6%, p<0.001). Conclusions: While prevalence of FA genes BRCA2, PALB2, and BRIP1 is well-described, our study supports testing a broader range of FA genes given the prevalence rates, potential implications for clinical trials, targeted therapy, inherited syndromes, and reproductive implications.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veda N. Giri
- Departments of Medical Oncology, Cancer Biology, and Urology, Cancer Risk Assessment and Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Laura Gross
- Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Ayako Shimada
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - William Kevin Kelly
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Leonard G. Gomella
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Salib A, McPartland C, Mark JR, Lallas CD, Trabulsi EJ, Gomella LG, Chandrasekar T. Risk of secondary malignancies after pelvic radiation: A population-based analysis. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.6_suppl.478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
478 Background: Radiation therapy (RT) is an integral component of the multimodal therapy of pelvic malignancies, either as primary treatment or in combination with surgical resection. In addition to local treatment effects on nearby pelvic organs, RT has been established to be a risk factor for delayed secondary malignancies. In this study, we examine the rate of any secondary malignancies following RT for primary pelvic malignancies, with a specific emphasis on secondary pelvic malignancies Methods: Using the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Ends Results) database, we retrospectively examined 2,102,192 patients with primary pelvic malignancies (prostate, bladder, uterine, rectal, cervical). For each disease site, we compared the rate of all secondary malignancies in radiated patients to non-radiated patients. Secondary malignancies were then stratified as pelvic and non-pelvic, in order to determine the local effect of RT on malignancy risk. Results: A total of 2,102,192 patients were examined (1,189,108 prostate, 315,026 bladder, 88,809 cervical, 249,535 uterine, 259,714 rectal). A total of 113,322 patients developed secondary malignancies after RT (Table), with 26,299 developing secondary pelvic malignancies after RT (18,411 prostate, 1,026 bladder, 1,410 cervical, 2,179 uterine, 3,273 rectal) (Table). The overall relative risk (RR) of RT on developing a secondary malignancy was 1.79 (1.77-1.80 CI, P<0.0001), particularly in patients with prostate (RR 2.57), uterine (RR 1.24) and cervical cancer (1.09). The overall RR of RT on developing a secondary pelvic malignancy was 2.09 (2.06-2.13 CI, P<0.0001), particularly in patients with bladder (RR 6.90), prostate (RR 2.74), and uterine cancer (RR 1.21). Conclusions: Radiation treatment for pelvic malignancies increases the risk of developing secondary malignancies over the patient’s lifetime. Further work needs to done to identify at risk populations.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Connor McPartland
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - James Ryan Mark
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Costas D. Lallas
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Edouard John Trabulsi
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Leonard G. Gomella
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Gomella LG. Aligning Prostate Cancer Screening Recommendations for Patients and Provider. Can J Urol 2021; 28:10878-10880. [PMID: 34895390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
|
34
|
Giri VN, Walker A, Gross L, Trabulsi EJ, Lallas CD, Kelly WK, Gomella LG, Fischer C, Loeb S. Helix: A Digital Tool to Address Provider Needs for Prostate Cancer Genetic Testing in Clinical Practice. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021; 20:e104-e113. [PMID: 35012874 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer (PCA) germline testing (GT) is now standard-of-care for men with advanced PCA. Thousands of men may consider GT due to clinical and family history (FH) features. Identifying and consenting men for GT can be complex. Here we identified barriers and facilitators of GT across a spectrum of providers which informed the development of Helix - an educational and clinical/FH collection tool to facilitate GT in practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS A 12-question survey assessing knowledge of genetics PCA risk and FH was administered December 2017 to March 2018 in the Philadelphia area and at the Mid-Atlantic AUA meeting (March 2018). Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and urologists across practice settings from March-October 2020 as part of a larger study based on the Tailored Implementation in Chronic Diseases framework. Helix was then developed followed by user testing. RESULTS Fifty-six providers (50% urologists) responded to the survey. Multiple FH and genetic knowledge gaps were identified: only 66% collected maternal FH and 43% correctly identified BRCA2 and association to aggressive PCA. Genetic counseling gaps included low rates of discussing genetic discrimination laws (45%). Provider interviews (n = 14) identified barriers to FH intake including access to details and time needed. In user testing (n = 10), providers found Helix helpful for FH collection. All providers found Helix easy to use, suggesting expanded clinical use. CONCLUSION Helix addressed multiple GT knowledge and practice gaps across a spectrum of providers. This tool will become publicly available soon to facilitate PCA GT in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veda N Giri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Cancer Risk Assessment and Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
| | | | - Laura Gross
- Cancer Risk Assessment and Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Costas D Lallas
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - William K Kelly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Leonard G Gomella
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Corey Fischer
- Jefferson Digital Innovation and Consumer Experience, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Stacy Loeb
- NYU-Langone Health, New York, NY; Manhattan Veterans Affairs Hospital, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Chandrasekar T, Bowler N, Schneider A, Goldberg H, Mark JR, Trabulsi EJ, Lallas CD, Gomella LG. AUTHOR REPLY. Urology 2021; 155:109. [PMID: 34488992 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.05.074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicholas Bowler
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Adam Schneider
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - James R Mark
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Costas D Lallas
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Leonard G Gomella
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Russo J, McDougall C, Bowler N, Shimada A, Gross L, Hyatt C, Kelly WK, Calvaresi A, Handley NR, Hirsch IH, Izes JK, Lallas CD, Mann M, Mark JR, Mille PJ, Preate D, Trabulsi EJ, Tsang M, Chandrasekar T, Weiner PR, Gomella LG, Giri VN. Pretest Genetic Education Video Versus Genetic Counseling for Men Considering Prostate Cancer Germline Testing: A Patient-Choice Study to Address Urgent Practice Needs. JCO Precis Oncol 2021; 5:PO.21.00238. [PMID: 34589662 PMCID: PMC8462590 DOI: 10.1200/po.21.00238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Germline testing (GT) for prostate cancer (PCA) is now central to treatment and hereditary cancer assessment. With rising demand for and shortage of genetic counseling (GC), tools to deliver pretest informed consent across practice settings are needed to improve access to GT and precision care. Here, we report on Evaluation and Management for Prostate Oncology, Wellness, and Risk (EMPOWER), a patient-choice study for pretest video-based genetic education (VBGE) versus GC to inform urgent practice needs. PATIENTS AND METHODS Men with PCA or at risk for PCA (family history of PCA) were eligible and could choose pretest VBGE or GC. Outcomes included decisional conflict for GT, change in genetics knowledge, satisfaction, and intention to share results with family and/or providers. Descriptive statistics summarized results with counts and percentages for categorical variables and mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables. Data were compared with Fisher's exact, chi-squared, or Wilcoxon two-sample tests. Mean change in genetics knowledge was compared with t tests. The significance level was set a priori at .05. RESULTS Data on the first 127 participants were analyzed. Characteristics were White (85.8%), bachelor's degree (66.9%), and PCA diagnosis (90.6%). The majority chose VBGE (71%) versus GC (29%; P < .001). No differences were observed in decisional conflict for GT or satisfaction. Cancer genetics knowledge improved in both groups without significant difference (+0.9 VBGE, +1.8 GC, P = .056). Men who chose VBGE had higher intention to share GT results (96.4% VBGE v 86.4% GC, P = .02). Both groups had high rates of GT uptake (VBGE 94.4%, GC 92%). CONCLUSION A substantial proportion of men opted for pretest VBGE, with comparable patient-reported outcomes and uptake of GT. The results support the use of pretest video to address the critical GC shortage in the precision era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Russo
- Cancer Risk Assessment and Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Carey McDougall
- Cancer Risk Assessment and Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Nicholas Bowler
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ayako Shimada
- Biostatistics Facility, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Laura Gross
- Cancer Risk Assessment and Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Colette Hyatt
- University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT
| | - William K. Kelly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Anne Calvaresi
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Nathan R. Handley
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Irvin H. Hirsch
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Joseph K. Izes
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Costas D. Lallas
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mark Mann
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - James Ryan Mark
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Patrick J. Mille
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Miranda Tsang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Perry R. Weiner
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Veda N. Giri
- Cancer Risk Assessment and Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Gomella LG. Surgical mesh: not as bad as you think. Can J Urol 2021; 28:10733. [PMID: 34378505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
|
38
|
Chandrasekar T, Kelly WK, Gomella LG. Overview of Prostate Cancer Genetic Testing. Urol Clin North Am 2021; 48:279-282. [PMID: 34210484 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2021.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Thenappan Chandrasekar
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut Street, Suite 1100, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
| | - William K Kelly
- Medical Oncology and Urology, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, 1025 Walnut Street, Suite 700, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Leonard G Gomella
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University and Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut Street, Suite 1100, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA. https://twitter.com/LeonardGomella
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Gonzalez D, Mateo J, Stenzinger A, Rojo F, Shiller M, Wyatt AW, Penault‐Llorca F, Gomella LG, Eeles R, Bjartell A. Practical considerations for optimising homologous recombination repair mutation testing in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. J Pathol Clin Res 2021; 7:311-325. [PMID: 33630412 PMCID: PMC8185363 DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Revised: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Analysis of the genomic landscape of prostate cancer has identified different molecular subgroups with relevance for novel or existing targeted therapies. The recent approvals of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors olaparib and rucaparib in the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) setting signal the need to embed molecular diagnostics in the clinical pathway of patients with mCRPC to identify those who can benefit from targeted therapies. Best practice guidelines in overall biospecimen collection and processing for molecular analysis are widely available for several tumour types. However, there is no standard protocol for molecular diagnostic testing in prostate cancer. Here, we provide a series of recommendations on specimen handling, sample pre-analytics, laboratory workflow, and testing pathways to maximise the success rates for clinical genomic analysis in prostate cancer. Early involvement of a multidisciplinary team of pathologists, urologists, oncologists, radiologists, nurses, molecular scientists, and laboratory staff is key to enable optimal workflow for specimen selection and preservation at the time of diagnosis so that samples are available for molecular analysis when required. Given the improved outcome of patients with mCRPC and homologous recombination repair gene alterations who have been treated with PARP inhibitors, there is an urgent need to incorporate high-quality genomic testing in the routine clinical pathway of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Gonzalez
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer ResearchQueen's UniversityBelfastUK
| | - Joaquin Mateo
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO)Vall d'Hebron University HospitalBarcelonaSpain
| | | | - Federico Rojo
- Department of PathologyIIS‐Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz‐CIBERONCMadridSpain
| | - Michelle Shiller
- Department of PathologyBaylor University Medical CenterDallasTXUSA
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic SciencesUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| | - Frédérique Penault‐Llorca
- Centre Jean PerrinUniversité Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, U1240 Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies ThéranostiquesClermont FerrandFrance
| | - Leonard G Gomella
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer CenterThomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaPAUSA
| | - Ros Eeles
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Anders Bjartell
- Division of Urological Cancers, Department of Translational MedicineLund UniversityLundSweden
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Peters CJ, Turner CE, Chesnut GT, Giri VN, Gomella LG, Shriver CD, Dobi A. Philadelphia Prostate Cancer Genetic Consensus Conference 2019 and implications for military medicine. Can J Urol 2021; 28:10659-10667. [PMID: 34129457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED INTRODUCTION The objective of our review is to summarize the 2019 Philadelphia Prostate Cancer Genetic Consensus recommendations and discuss their implications to the US Military Health System. MATERIALS AND METHODS Literature review. RESULTS Our fighting force and retired service members will significantly benefit from the Philadelphia Prostate Cancer Genetic Consensus recommendations. Moreover, the experience of the equal access US Military Health System may help advancing genetic testing for cancer at national levels. CONCLUSIONS Priorities recommended by the 2019 Consensus for more research on genetic predisposition to prostate cancer in racially diverse populations is a promising step. The US Military Health System has the ability of providing equal access to implement advanced germline testing for its racially diverse population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cord J Peters
- Edward Hebert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Gomella LG. Keeping Our Morcellators Straight in Minimally Invasive Surgery. Can J Urol 2021; 28:10652. [PMID: 34129453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
|
42
|
Glick L, Vincent SA, Squadron D, Han TM, Syed K, Danella JF, Ginzburg S, Guzzo TJ, Lanchoney T, Raman JD, Smaldone M, Uzzo RG, Tomaszweski JJ, Reese A, Singer EA, Jacobs B, Trabulsi EJ, Gomella LG, Mann MJ. Preventing Prostate Biopsy Complications: to Augment or to Swab? Urology 2021; 155:12-19. [PMID: 33878333 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.02.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To use data from a large, prospectively- acquired regional collaborative database to compare the risk of infectious complications associated with three American Urologic Association- recommended antibiotic prophylaxis pathways, including culture-directed or augmented antibiotics, following prostate biopsy. METHODS Data on prostate biopsies and outcomes were collected from the Pennsylvania Urologic Regional Collaborative, a regional quality collaborative working to improve the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. Patients were categorized as receiving one of three prophylaxis pathways: culture-directed, augmented, or provider-discretion. Infectious complications included fever, urinary tract infections or sepsis within one month of biopsy. Odds ratios of infectious complication by pathway were determined, and univariate and multivariate analyses of patient and biopsy characteristics were performed. RESULTS 11,940 biopsies were included, 120 of which resulted in infectious outcomes. Of the total biopsies, 3246 used "culture-directed", 1446 used "augmented" and 7207 used "provider-discretion" prophylaxis. Compared to provider-discretion, the culture-directed pathway had 84% less chance of any infectious outcome (OR= 0.159, 95% CI = [0.074, 0.344], P < 0.001). There was no difference in infectious complications between augmented and provider-discretion pathways. CONCLUSIONS The culture-directed pathway for transrectal prostate biopsy resulted in significantly fewer infectious complications compared to other prophylaxis strategies. Tailoring antibiotics addresses antibiotic-resistant bacteria and reduces future risk of resistance. These findings make a strong case for incorporating culture-directed antibiotic prophylaxis into clinical practice guidelines to reduce infection following prostate biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia Glick
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sage A Vincent
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Danielle Squadron
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Timothy M Han
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kanata Syed
- Health Care Improvement Foundation, Philadelphia, PA
| | - John F Danella
- Department of Urology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA
| | - Serge Ginzburg
- Department of Urology, Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Thomas J Guzzo
- Division of Urology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Jay D Raman
- Division of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Marc Smaldone
- Division of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Robert G Uzzo
- Division of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Adam Reese
- Department of Urology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Eric A Singer
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Bruce Jacobs
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburg, PA
| | - Edouard J Trabulsi
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Leonard G Gomella
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mark J Mann
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Thakur ML, Tripathi SK, Gomella LG, Salmanoglu E, Kim S, Kelly WK, Keith SW, Intenzo C, McCue P, Hoffman-Censits J, Trabulsi EJ. Imaging urothelial bladder cancer: A VPAC PET targeted approach. Can J Urol 2021; 28:10596-10602. [PMID: 33872557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED INTRODUCTION Accurate staging of urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) with imaging, which guides effective bladder cancer treatment, remains challenging. This investigation is to validate a hypothesis that targeting Vasoactive intestinal and pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide (VPAC) receptors using ⁶⁴Cu-TP3805 can PET image UBC efficiently. MATERIALS AND METHODS Nineteen patients (44-84 years of age) scheduled for radical cystectomy, underwent VPAC positron emission tomography (PET) imaging prior to surgery. Sixteen had completed neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to imaging. All 19 received ⁶⁴Cu-TP3805 (148 % ± 10% MBq) intravenously, and were imaged 60 to 90 minutes later. Standard uptake value (SUV)max for malignant lesions and SUVmean for normal tissues were determined and mean +/-SEM recorded. Following radical cystoprostatectomy, pelvic lymphadenectomy and urinary diversion imaging, results were compared with final surgical pathology. RESULTS ⁶⁴Cu-TP3805 had no adverse events, negligible urinary excretion and rapid blood clearance. UBC PET images for residual disease were true positive in 11 patients and true negative in four. Of remaining 4, one had false positive and 3 had false negative scans, equating to 79% sensitivity (95%, CI 49%-95%), 80% specificity (95%, CI 28%-100%), 92% positive predictive value (95%, CI 62%-100%) and 57% negative predictive value (95%, CI 18%-90%). CONCLUSIONS These first in man results, in a group, heavily pretreated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, indicate that VPAC PET imaging can identify UBC effeiciently and suggest, that VPAC PET can diagnose UBC in a treatment naïve cohort for accurate staging, guide biopsy and treatment in patients with suspected metastasis and determine response to therapy. Further investigation of this molecular imaging approach is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathew L Thakur
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Gomella LG. The Agony and Ecstasy of Prostate Cancer PSMA PET. Can J Urol 2021; 28:10574-10575. [PMID: 33872551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
|
45
|
Quinn A, Mann E, Lallas CD, Mark JR, Chandrasekar T, Trabulsi EJ, Gomella LG, Mann MJ. Genomic analysis for active surveillance to predict upstaging after prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.6_suppl.258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
258 Background: Active Surveillance (AS) of prostate cancers lowers morbidity and mortality with conservative management but requires vigilance to prevent disease progression. Understanding of disease aggression through genomic analysis has enhanced AS. About one third of prostatectomies reveal a Gleason upgrade to stage T3 or node positivity, and increased risk on a single genomic analysis increases the risk of progression and Gleason upgrade. More information is needed to compare these tests and determine their roles in academic and private practice settings. Methods: The Pennsylvania Urologic Regional Collaborative (PURC), funded by participating urology practices and the Partnership for Patient Care, a quality improvement initiative supported by the Health Care Improvement Foundation, Independence Blue Cross, and southeastern PA hospitals and health systems, database was analyzed with permission to find patients who received both AS and prostatectomy for treatment of prostate cancer. Patients were then selected who had genomic analysis performed on biopsy samples using analysis from Decipher Biopsy, Oncotype Dx, or Prolaris. Patients were sorted into genomic risk categories and biopsy pathology, prostatectomy pathology, and time to surgery was compared. Results: Thirty-nine patients met criteria for the study. Nineteen were considered to be very low risk based on genomic analysis, 11 were low risk, and nine were intermediate risk. Average time of progression from AS to prostatectomy was shorter with increased genomic risk: from 1.7 years for very low genomic risk individuals, to 1.3 for low risk, to 0.8 years for intermediate risk. All three groups had a significant decrease in Gleason Grade Group from biopsy to final pathology (p < 0.05). Five of the 19 patients (26%) in the very low risk group were upgraded to pT3 after prostatectomy, one (9%) of the low risk group was upgraded, and four of the 9 (44%) in the intermediate risk group were upgraded. Regardless of genomic risk, 14% of patients who had analysis performed with Oncotype Dx received a Gleason upgrade, compared to 67% of patients with Decipher Biopsy analysis and 43% of patients with Prolaris genomic analysis. Conclusions: Our pilot study indicates that while higher genomic risk categorization led to a more rapid progression to treatment, Gleason Grade Group decreased from biopsy to final pathology in each risk group, suggesting more time before progression to treatment may be warranted. Very low and low risk patients had less risk of Gleason upgrade compared to intermediate risk patients. While our numbers are low, the difference in Gleason upgrade based on genomic analysis provides an interesting exploratory analysis that requires further investigation. More analysis comparing the intricacies of the reporting methods is needed to elucidate the benefits and drawbacks for each genomic test available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Quinn
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Erica Mann
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Costas D. Lallas
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - James Ryan Mark
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Edouard John Trabulsi
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Leonard G. Gomella
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Boorjian SA, Alemozaffar M, Konety BR, Shore ND, Gomella LG, Kamat AM, Bivalacqua TJ, Montgomery JS, Lerner SP, Busby JE, Poch M, Crispen PL, Steinberg GD, Schuckman AK, Downs TM, Svatek RS, Mashni J, Lane BR, Guzzo TJ, Bratslavsky G, Karsh LI, Woods ME, Brown G, Canter D, Luchey A, Lotan Y, Krupski T, Inman BA, Williams MB, Cookson MS, Keegan KA, Andriole GL, Sankin AI, Boyd A, O'Donnell MA, Sawutz D, Philipson R, Coll R, Narayan VM, Treasure FP, Yla-Herttuala S, Parker NR, Dinney CPN. Intravesical nadofaragene firadenovec gene therapy for BCG-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a single-arm, open-label, repeat-dose clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:107-117. [PMID: 33253641 PMCID: PMC7988888 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30540-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 146] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND BCG is the most effective therapy for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Nadofaragene firadenovec (also known as rAd-IFNa/Syn3) is a replication-deficient recombinant adenovirus that delivers human interferon alfa-2b cDNA into the bladder epithelium, and a novel intravesical therapy for BCG-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. We aimed to evaluate its efficacy in patients with BCG-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. METHODS In this phase 3, multicentre, open-label, repeat-dose study done in 33 centres (hospitals and clinics) in the USA, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older, with BCG-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status of 2 or less. Patients were excluded if they had upper urinary tract disease, urothelial carcinoma within the prostatic urethra, lymphovascular invasion, micropapillary disease, or hydronephrosis. Eligible patients received a single intravesical 75 mL dose of nadofaragene firadenovec (3 × 1011 viral particles per mL). Repeat dosing at months 3, 6, and 9 was done in the absence of high-grade recurrence. The primary endpoint was complete response at any time in patients with carcinoma in situ (with or without a high-grade Ta or T1 tumour). The null hypothesis specified a complete response rate of less than 27% in this cohort. Efficacy analyses were done on the per-protocol population, to include only patients strictly meeting the BCG-unresponsive definition. Safety analyses were done in all patients who received at least one dose of treatment. The study is ongoing, with a planned 4-year treatment and monitoring phase. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02773849. FINDINGS Between Sept 19, 2016, and May 24, 2019, 198 patients were assessed for eligibility. 41 patients were excluded, and 157 were enrolled and received at least one dose of the study drug. Six patients did not meet the definition of BCG-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and were therefore excluded from efficacy analyses; the remaining 151 patients were included in the per-protocol efficacy analyses. 55 (53·4%) of 103 patients with carcinoma in situ (with or without a high-grade Ta or T1 tumour) had a complete response within 3 months of the first dose and this response was maintained in 25 (45·5%) of 55 patients at 12 months. Micturition urgency was the most common grade 3-4 study drug-related adverse event (two [1%] of 157 patients, both grade 3), and there were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION Intravesical nadofaragene firadenovec was efficacious, with a favourable benefit:risk ratio, in patients with BCG-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. This represents a novel treatment option in a therapeutically challenging disease state. FUNDING FKD Therapies Oy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Neal D Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| | - Leonard G Gomella
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Trinity J Bivalacqua
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Seth P Lerner
- Scott Department of Urology, Dan L Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joseph E Busby
- Cancer Centers of the Carolinas, Greenville Hospital System, Greenville, SC, USA
| | - Michael Poch
- Department of GU Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Paul L Crispen
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Gary D Steinberg
- Department of Urology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anne K Schuckman
- USC Institute of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Tracy M Downs
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Robert S Svatek
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | | | - Brian R Lane
- Division of Urology, Spectrum Health, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Thomas J Guzzo
- Division of Urology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Michael E Woods
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Adam Luchey
- West Virginia University Cancer Institute, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Tracey Krupski
- Department of Urology, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Brant A Inman
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Michael S Cookson
- Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Kirk A Keegan
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Gerald L Andriole
- Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Vikram M Narayan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Seppo Yla-Herttuala
- AI Virtanen Institute University of Eastern Finland and Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Nigel R Parker
- AI Virtanen Institute University of Eastern Finland and Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Colin P N Dinney
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Handley NR, Feng FY, Guise TA, D'Andrea D, Kelly WK, Gomella LG. Preserving Well-being in Patients With Advanced and Late Prostate Cancer. Urology 2020; 155:199-209. [PMID: 33373704 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Revised: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Androgen deprivation therapy, alone or in combination with androgen signaling inhibitors, is a treatment option for patients with advanced prostate cancer (PC). When making treatment decisions, health care providers must consider the long-term effects of treatment on the patient's overall health and well-being. Herein, we review the effects of these treatments on the musculoskeletal and cardiovascular systems, cognition, and fall risk, and provide management approaches for each. We also include an algorithm to help health care providers implement best clinical practices and interdisciplinary care for preserving the overall well-being of PC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan R Handley
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Urology, and Medicine, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Theresa A Guise
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | - William Kevin Kelly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Leonard G Gomella
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Gomella LG. 'Send me a picture of your urine': Telemedicine in Urology. Can J Urol 2020; 27:10424-10425. [PMID: 33325341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
|
49
|
Chung PH, Leong JY, Teplitsky S, Shenot PJ, Das AK, Gomella LG. Next-generation DNA sequencing for infected genitourinary implants: How I do it. Can J Urol 2020; 27:10418-10423. [PMID: 33049198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Infection of artificial urinary sphincters or inflatable penile prostheses is one of the most devastating complications after prosthetic surgery and can have a significant impact on a quality of life. Patients undergoing revision surgery with or without device replacement may have increased risk for infection when compared to initial primary surgery. As such, surgeons may utilize traditional culture results to direct antimicrobial therapy for these patients. Unfortunately, culture results can be inconclusive in up to one-third of the time even in the setting of active device infection. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of DNA is an emerging technology capable of sequencing entire bacterial genomes and has the potential to identify microbial composition in explanted devices. Herein, we describe our institutional experience on NGS utilization in patients with genitourinary prostheses. We also highlight our methods and techniques to inform readers on the potential practices that can enhance the utility and diagnostic yield of this new and upcoming technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul H Chung
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Gomella LG. COVID-19 and The Prostate Cancer Connection. Can J Urol 2020; 27:10346. [PMID: 33049184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
|