Current use of percutaneous image-guided tumor ablation for the therapy of liver tumors: lessons learned from the registry of the German Society for Interventional Radiology and Minimally Invasive Therapy (DeGIR) 2018-2022

OBJECTIVES

Percutaneous image-guided tumor ablation of liver malignancies has become an indispensable therapeutic procedure. The aim of this evaluation of the prospectively managed multinational registry of the voluntary German Society for Interventional Radiology and Minimally Invasive Therapy (DeGIR) was to analyze its use, technical success, and complications in clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All liver tumor ablations from 2018 to 2022 were included. Technical success was defined as complete ablation of the tumor with an ablative margin.

RESULTS

A total of 7228 liver tumor ablations from 136 centers in Germany and Austria were analyzed. In total, 31.4% (2268/7228) of patients were female. Median age was 67 years (IQR 58-74 years). Microwave ablation (MWA) was performed in 65.1% (4703/7228), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in 32.7% (2361/7228). Of 5229 cases with reported tumor etiology, 60.3% (3152/5229) of ablations were performed for liver metastases and 37.3% (1950/5229) for hepatocellular carcinoma. The median lesion diameter was 19 mm (IQR 12-27 mm). In total, 91.8% (6636/7228) of ablations were technically successful. The rate of technically successful ablations was significantly higher in MWA (93.9%, 4417/4703) than in RFA (87.3%, 2061/2361) (p < 0.0001). The total complication rate was 3.0% (214/7228) and was significantly higher in MWA (4.0%, 189/4703) than in RFA (0.9%, 21/2361, p < 0.0001). Additional needle track ablation did not increase the rate of major complications significantly (24.8% (33/133) vs. 28.4% (23/81), p = 0.56)).

CONCLUSION

MWA is the most frequent ablation method. Percutaneous image-guided liver tumor ablations have a high technical success rate, which is higher for MWA than RFA. The complication rate is generally low but is higher for MWA than RFA.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Percutaneous image-guided liver ablation using microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation are effective therapeutic procedures with low complication rates for the treatment of primary and secondary liver malignancies.

KEY POINTS

• Percutaneous image-guided liver tumor ablations have a high technical success rate, which is higher for microwave ablation than radiofrequency ablation. • Microwave ablation is the most frequent ablation method ahead of radiofrequency ablation. • The complication rate is generally low but is higher for microwave ablation than radiofrequency ablation.

Voxel-Based Dosimetry Predicts Hepatotoxicity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Radioembolization with 90Y Glass Microspheres

Personalized dosimetry holds promise to improve radioembolization treatment outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. To this end, tolerance absorbed doses for nontumor liver tissue are assessed by calculating the mean absorbed dose to the whole nontumor liver tissue (AD-WNTLT), which may be limited by its neglect of nonuniform dose distribution. Thus, we analyzed whether voxel-based dosimetry could be more accurate in predicting hepatotoxicity in HCC patients undergoing radioembolization. Methods: In total, 176 HCC patients were available for this retrospective analysis; of these, 78 underwent partial- and 98 whole-liver treatment. Posttherapeutic changes in bilirubin were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. We performed voxel-based and multicompartment dosimetry using pretherapeutic ^99mTc-labeled human serum albumin SPECT and contrast-enhanced CT/MRI and defined the following dosimetry parameters: AD-WNTLT; the nontumor liver tissue volume exposed to at least 20 Gy (V20), at least 30 Gy (V30), and at least 40 Gy (V40); and the threshold absorbed dose to the 20% (AD-20) and 30% (AD-30) of nontumor liver tissue with the lowest absorbed dose. Their impact on hepatotoxicity after 6 mo was analyzed using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve; thresholds were identified using the Youden index. Results: The area under the curve for prediction of posttherapeutic grade 3+ increases in bilirubin was acceptable for V20 (0.77), V30 (0.78), and V40 (0.79), whereas it was low for AD-WNTLT (0.67). The predictive value could further be increased in the subanalysis of patients with whole-liver treatment, where a good discriminatory power was found for V20 (0.80), V30 (0.82), V40 (0.84), AD-20 (0.80), and AD-30 (0.82) and an acceptable discriminatory power was found for AD-WNTLT (0.63). The accuracies of V20 (P = 0.03), V30 (P = 0.009), V40 (P = 0.004), AD-20 (P = 0.04), and AD-30 (P = 0.02) were superior to that of AD-WNTLT but did not differ significantly from each other. The respective thresholds were 78% (V30), 72% (V40), and 43 Gy (AD-30). Statistical significance was not reached for partial-liver treatment. Conclusion: Voxel-based dosimetry may more accurately predict hepatotoxicity than multicompartment dosimetry in HCC patients undergoing radioembolization, which could enable dose escalation or deescalation with the intent to optimize treatment response. Our results indicate that a V40 of 72% may be particularly useful in whole-liver treatment. However, further research is warranted to validate these results.

Adjunctive Hydrocortisone Improves Hemodynamics in Critically Ill Patients with Septic Shock: An Observational Study Using Transpulmonary Thermodilution

Introduction: Septic shock is associated with high mortality and hemodynamic impairment. The use of corticoids is a common therapeutic tool in critically ill patients. However, data on the mechanisms and prognostic ability of hemodynamic improvement by adjunctive steroids are rare. This study primarily aimed to evaluate short-term effects of hydrocortisone therapy on catecholamine requirement and hemodynamics derived from transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) in 30 critically ill patients with septic shock and a 28 days mortality rate of 50%. Methods: Hydrocortisone was administered with an intravenous bolus of 200 mg, followed by a continuous infusion of 200 mg per 24 h. Hemodynamic assessment was performed immediately before as well as 2, 8, 16, and 24 h after the initiation of corticoids. For primary endpoint analysis, we evaluated the impact of hydrocortisone on vasopressor dependency index (VDI) and cardiac power index (CPI). Results: Adjunctive hydrocortisone induced significant decreases of VDI from 0.41 (0.29-0.49) mmHg^-1 at baseline to 0.35 (0.25-0.46) after 2 h (P < .001), 0.24 (0.12-0.35) after 8 h (P < .001), 0.18 (0.09-0.24) after 16 h (P < .001) and 0.11 (0.06-0.20) mmHg^-1 after 24 h (P < .001). In parallel, we found an improvement in CPI from 0.63 (0.50-0.83) W/m² at baseline to 0.68 (0.54-0.85) after 2 h (P = .208), 0.71 (0.60-0.90) after 8 h (P = .033), 0.82 (0.6-0.98) after 16 h (P = .004) and 0.90 (0.67-1.07) W/m² after 24 h (P < .001). Our analyses revealed a significant reduction in noradrenaline requirement in parallel with a moderate increase in mean arterial pressure, systemic vascular resistance index, and cardiac index. As a secondary endpoint, our results showed a significant decrease in lung water parameters. Moreover, changes in CPI (ΔCPI) and VDI (ΔVDI) after 24 h of hydrocortisone therapy revealed accurate prognostic ability to predict 28 days mortality (AUC = 0.802 vs 0.769). Conclusion: Adjunctive hydrocortisone leads to a rapid decrease in catecholamine requirement and a substantial circulatory improvement in critically ill patients with septic shock.