Characterization of a flavonol-rich antioxidant fraction from Spondias purpurea L. pulp and the effect of its incorporation on cellulose acetate-based film

BACKGROUND

Active packaging containing natural flavonoid has recently emerged as a result of its potential to inhibit the oxidation of foods by interacting with it and/or its surrounding environment, with the aim of counteracting oxidation reactions and extending the shelf-life of foods. The plant Spondias purpurea L. is widely found in northeastern Brazil and is known to contain bioactive flavonoids. The present study aimed to obtain a flavonoid-rich fraction from the pulp of S. purpurea L. and incorporate it into the cellulose acetate film to obtain biodegradable films with antioxidant properties.

RESULTS

The fractionation in SiO₂ open-column chromatography of the S. purpurea pulp crude extract furnished an antioxidant active fraction containing the flavonols quercetin 3-O-rutinoside and kaempferol 3-O-rutinoside as the major compounds. This active fraction was incorporated (10, 20 and 30 g kg^-1 ) into the substance produced with the casting method for cellulose acetate films. The films produced were characterized concerning mechanical properties, water vapor permeability (WVP) and antioxidant activity.

CONCLUSION

The incorporation of the active flavonoid fraction from S. purpurea in the cellulose acetate films decreases WVP and elongation at break, at the same time as increasing antioxidant activity, tensile strength and elastic modulus. Thus, the S. purpurea pulps may be an alternative as a source of antioxidants for use in cellulose acetate films. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry.

Variations in regional strain under different afterload conditions may help to identify ischemic myocardium

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Introduction

 Acute coronary syndromes are a major health problem worldwide. The Speckle Tracking Imaging has been proposed as adjunctive for diagnosis and prognosis purposes in the context of NSTE-ACS.

Purpose

We sought to determine the regional myocardial strain in ischemic versus non-ischemic segments in subjects with NSTE-ACS, before and during acute pressure overload.

Methods

Data from 2D-echocardiography were obtained from 21 patients (mean age, 50 ± 10 years) undergoing cinecoronariography for NSTE-ACS indications. A blinded observer performed an offline analysis to obtain  the Systolic Positive Peak (P), Systolic Peak Strain (S), Peak Strain (G) and Time to Peak Strain (TTP) of each segment acquired before and during pressure overload-induced by left hand-grip (42± 8 Kg) combined with simultaneous pneumatic constriction of the right arm and both lower limbs. Moreover, LVEF and GLS were also calculated. A second blinded observer labelled the ischemic regions according to AHA-16 Bull’s eye using data from cinecoronariography.

Results

The handgrip manuever caused mild reductions in the median LVEF (56 %; IQR 48 -58% vs 54%; IQR 51-56%) as well as the median GLS (-17%; IQR-19%-15% vs -16%; IQR -19-15%). For the analysis of regional myocardial function, we obtained 360 segments (29% labelled as ischemic) with optimal tracking quality. Mean regional strain changes during pressure overload were significantly different in ischemic vs non-ischemic segments for Peak S ( 1,07% x -0.5%; p-value <0,01) and Peak G (0.85% x -0.65%; p-value < 0.01)(Table). Notably, however, we found marked increases in the systolic deformation, restricted to the apical ischemic segments during pressure overload (Figure).

Conclusions

Our data point to a distinct increase in the systolic deformation of the apical segments in contrast to the overall reductions in the GLS and  EF in the ischemic left ventricle.

Non- Ischemic segments N = 256 Ischemic segments N = 104 Baseline Handgrip Variation (%) Baseline Handgrip Variation (%) p-value* Peak P 0.33(0.57) 0.36(0.7) 0.03(0.7) 0.50(0.7) 0.57(0.8) 0.07(0.8) 0.32 Peak S -17.9(4.4) -16.8(5.3) 1.07(4.1) -16.6 (5.2) -17.2(5.6) -0.5(4.8) 0.0006 Peak G -18.5 (4.2) -17.68 (4.6) 0.85 (3.7) -17.3 (4.5) -18 (4.6) -0.65(4.2) 0.0005 TTP 377(62) 384(66) 6.5(52) 387(65_ 388(62) 1.15(46) 0.17 * t- test comparing the variations baseline-handgrip between the two groups (ischemic versus non-ischemic. Peak P= positive systolic peak; Peak S= systolic peak; Peak G= peak strain; TTP= time to peak Abstract Figure