1
|
Kaufman EJ, Wirtalla CJ, Keele LJ, Neuman MD, Rosen CB, Syvyk S, Hatchimonji J, Ginzberg S, Friedman A, Roberts SE, Kelz RR. Costs of Care for Operative and Nonoperative Management of Emergency General Surgery Conditions. Ann Surg 2024; 279:684-691. [PMID: 37855681 PMCID: PMC10939968 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Many emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions can be managed operatively or nonoperatively, with outcomes that vary by diagnosis. We hypothesized that operative management would lead to higher in-hospital costs but to cost savings over time. BACKGROUND EGS conditions account for $28 billion in health care costs in the United States annually. Compared with scheduled surgery, patients who undergo emergency surgery are at increased risk of complications, readmissions, and death, with accompanying costs of care that are up to 50% higher than elective surgery. Our prior work demonstrated that operative management had variable impacts on clinical outcomes depending on the EGS condition. METHODS This was a nationwide, retrospective study using fee-for-service Medicare claims data. We included patients 65.5 years of age or older with a principal diagnosis for an EGS condition 7/1/2015-6/30/2018. EGS conditions were categorized as: colorectal, general abdominal, hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB), intestinal obstruction, and upper gastrointestinal. We used near-far matching with a preference-based instrumental variable to adjust for confounding and selection bias. Outcomes included Medicare payments for the index hospitalization and at 30, 90, and 180 days. RESULTS Of 507,677 patients, 30.6% received an operation. For HPB conditions, costs for operative management were initially higher but became equivalent at 90 and 180 days. For all others, operative management was associated with higher inpatient costs, which persisted, though narrowed, over time. Out-of-pocket costs were nearly equivalent for operative and nonoperative management. CONCLUSIONS Compared with nonoperative management, costs were higher or equivalent for operative management of EGS conditions through 180 days, which could impact decision-making for clinicians, patients, and health systems in situations where clinical outcomes are similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elinore J Kaufman
- Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care, and Emergency Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Christopher J Wirtalla
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Luke J Keele
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mark D Neuman
- Department of Anesthesia and critical Care Medicine, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Claire B Rosen
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Solomiya Syvyk
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Justin Hatchimonji
- Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care, and Emergency Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sara Ginzberg
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ari Friedman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sanford E Roberts
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Rachel R Kelz
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ginzberg SP, Wirtalla CJ, Keele LJ, Wachtel H, Kaufman EJ, Kelz RR. An acute care surgeon's dilemma: Operative vs. non-operative management of emergency general surgery conditions in patients with recent colorectal cancer treatment. Am J Surg 2024; 227:15-21. [PMID: 37741802 PMCID: PMC10841180 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This comparative effectiveness study examined outcomes of operative vs. non-operative management for emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions in patients with recent cancer treatment (RT). METHODS Medicare beneficiaries with a history of colorectal cancer hospitalized for an EGS condition (2016-2018) were identified. RT was defined as chemotherapy/radiation within 3 months prior to admission. Instrumental variable analysis assessed the impact of management on mortality and readmissions among survivors (30d, 60d, and 90d), for patients in whom there was clinical equipoise regarding optimal management strategy. RESULTS Of 26,097 patients, 13% had undergone RT. In both the RT and non-RT groups, the optimal management strategy was uncertain in 14%. Operative management conferred increased risk of mortality but not readmission in patients with RT compared to those without (90d mortality:+43%, p = 0.03; 90d readmission:+7.1%, p = 0.776). CONCLUSIONS In patients with RT for whom there is clinical equipoise regarding EGS management, operative intervention increases risk of mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara P Ginzberg
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | | | - Luke J Keele
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Heather Wachtel
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Elinore J Kaufman
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rachel R Kelz
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moneme AN, Wirtalla CJ, Roberts SE, Keele LJ, Kelz RR. Primary Care Physician Follow-Up and 30-Day Readmission After Emergency General Surgery Admissions. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:1293-1301. [PMID: 37755816 PMCID: PMC10534988 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
Importance The benefit of primary care physician (PCP) follow-up as a potential means to reduce readmissions in hospitalized patients has been found in other medical conditions and among patients receiving high-risk surgery. However, little is known about the implications of PCP follow-up for patients with an emergency general surgery (EGS) condition. Objective To evaluate the association between PCP follow-up and 30-day readmission rates after hospital discharge for an EGS condition. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study used data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Master Beneficiary Summary File, Inpatient, Carrier (Part B), and Durable Medical Equipment files for beneficiaries aged 66 years or older who were hospitalized with an EGS condition that was managed operatively or nonoperatively between September 1, 2016, and November 30, 2018. Eligible patients were enrolled in Medicare fee-for-service, admitted through the emergency department with a primary diagnosis of an EGS condition, and received a general surgery consultation during the admission. Data were analyzed between July 11, 2022, and June 5, 2023. Exposure Follow-up with a PCP within 30 days after hospital discharge for the index admission. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was readmission within 30 days after discharge for the index admission. An inverse probability weighted regression model was used to estimate the risk-adjusted association of PCP follow-up with 30-day readmission. The secondary outcome was readmission within 30 days after discharge stratified by treatment type (operative vs nonoperative treatment) during their index admission. Results The study included 345 360 Medicare beneficiaries (mean [SD] age, 74.4 [12.0] years; 187 804 females [54.4%]) hospitalized with an EGS condition. Of these, 156 820 patients (45.4%) had a follow-up PCP visit, 108 544 (31.4%) received operative treatment during their index admission, and 236 816 (68.6%) received nonoperative treatment. Overall, 58 253 of 332 874 patients (17.5%) were readmitted within 30 days after discharge for the index admission. After risk adjustment and propensity weighting, patients who had PCP follow-up had 67% lower odds of readmission (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.33; 95% CI, 0.31-0.36) compared with patients without PCP follow-up. After stratifying by treatment type, patients who were treated operatively during their index admission and had subsequent PCP follow-up within 30 days after discharge had 79% reduced odds of readmission (AOR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.18-0.25); a similar association was seen among patients who were treated nonoperatively (AOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.34-0.39). Infectious conditions, heart failure, acute kidney failure, and chronic kidney disease were among the most frequent diagnoses prompting readmission overall and among operative and nonoperative treatment groups. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, follow-up with a PCP within 30 days after discharge for an EGS condition was associated with a significant reduction in the adjusted odds of 30-day readmission. This association was similar for patients who received operative care or nonoperative care during their index admission. In patients aged 66 years or older with an EGS condition, primary care coordination after discharge may be an important tool to reduce readmissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adora N. Moneme
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Christopher J. Wirtalla
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sanford E. Roberts
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Luke J. Keele
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Rachel R. Kelz
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rosen CB, Roberts SE, Wirtalla CJ, Keele LJ, Kaufman EJ, Halpern S, Kelz RR. Emergency Surgery, Multimorbidity and Hospital-Free Days: A Retrospective Observational Study. J Surg Res 2023; 291:660-669. [PMID: 37556878 PMCID: PMC10530175 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.06.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Analyzing hospital-free days (HFDs) offers a patient-centered approach to health services research. We hypothesized that, within emergency general surgery (EGS), multimorbidity would be associated with fewer HFDs, whether patients were managed operatively or nonoperatively. METHODS EGS patients were identified using national Medicare claims data (2015-2018). Patients were classified as multimorbid based on the presence of a Qualifying Comorbidity Set and stratified by treatment: operative (received surgery within 48 h of index admission) and nonoperative. HFDs were calculated through 180 d, beginning on the day of index admission, as days alive and spent outside of a hospital, an Emergency Department, or a long-term acute care facility. Univariate comparisons were performed using Kruskal-Wallis tests and risk-adjusted HFDs were compared between multimorbid and nonmultimorbid patients using multivariable zero-inflated negative binomial regression models. RESULTS Among 174,891 operative patients, 45.5% were multimorbid. Among 398,756 nonoperative patients, 59.2% were multimorbid. Multimorbid patients had fewer median HFDs than nonmultimorbid patients among operative and nonoperative cohorts (P < 0.001). At 6 mo, among operative patients, multimorbid patients had 6.5 fewer HFDs (P < 0.001), and among nonoperative patients, multimorbid patients had 7.9 fewer HFDs (P < 0.001). When length of stay was included as a covariate, nonoperative multimorbid patients still had 7.9 fewer HFDs than nonoperative, nonmultimorbid patients (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS HFDs offer a patient-centered, composite outcome for claims-based analyses. For EGS patients, multimorbidity was associated with less time alive and out of the hospital, especially when patients were managed nonoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire B Rosen
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Sanford E Roberts
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Chris J Wirtalla
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Leonard Davis Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Luke J Keele
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Leonard Davis Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Elinore J Kaufman
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Leonard Davis Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Scott Halpern
- Leonard Davis Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Rachel R Kelz
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Leonard Davis Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rosen CB, Roberts SE, Wirtalla CJ, Keele LJ, Kaufman EJ, Halpern SD, Reilly PM, Neuman MD, Kelz RR. The Conditional Effects of Multimorbidity on Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Emergency General Surgery Conditions: A Retrospective Observational Study Using an Instrumental Variable Analysis. Ann Surg 2023; 278:e855-e862. [PMID: 37212397 PMCID: PMC10524950 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To understand how multimorbidity impacts operative versus nonoperative management of emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions. BACKGROUND EGS is a heterogenous field, encompassing operative and nonoperative treatment options. Decision-making is particularly complex for older patients with multimorbidity. METHODS Using an instrumental variable approach with near-far matching, this national, retrospective observational cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries examines the conditional effects of multimorbidity, defined using qualifying comorbidity sets, on operative versus nonoperative management of EGS conditions. RESULTS Of 507,667 patients with EGS conditions, 155,493 (30.6%) received an operation. Overall, 278,836 (54.9%) were multimorbid. After adjustment, multimorbidity significantly increased the risk of in-hospital mortality associated with operative management for general abdominal patients (+9.8%; P = 0.002) and upper gastrointestinal patients (+19.9%, P < 0.001) and the risk of 30-day mortality (+27.7%, P < 0.001) and nonroutine discharge (+21.8%, P = 0.007) associated with operative management for upper gastrointestinal patients. Regardless of multimorbidity status, operative management was associated with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality among colorectal patients (multimorbid: + 12%, P < 0.001; nonmultimorbid: +4%, P = 0.003), higher risk of nonroutine discharge among colorectal (multimorbid: +42.3%, P < 0.001; nonmultimorbid: +55.1%, P < 0.001) and intestinal obstruction patients (multimorbid: +14.6%, P = 0.001; nonmultimorbid: +14.8%, P = 0.001), and lower risk of nonroutine discharge (multimorbid: -11.5%, P < 0.001; nonmultimorbid: -11.9%, P < 0.001) and 30-day readmissions (multimorbid: -8.2%, P = 0.002; nonmultimorbid: -9.7%, P < 0.001) among hepatobiliary patients. CONCLUSIONS The effects of multimorbidity on operative versus nonoperative management varied by EGS condition category. Physicians and patients should have honest conversations about the expected risks and benefits of treatment options, and future investigations should aim to understand the optimal management of multimorbid EGS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire B Rosen
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
| | | | - Chris J Wirtalla
- Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
| | - Luke J Keele
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
| | | | - Scott D Halpern
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Patrick M Reilly
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
| | - Mark D Neuman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Rachel R Kelz
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Roberts SE, Rosen CB, Keele LJ, Kaufman EJ, Wirtalla CJ, Finn CB, Moneme AN, Bewtra M, Kelz RR. Association of Established Primary Care Use With Postoperative Mortality Following Emergency General Surgery Procedures. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:1023-1030. [PMID: 37466980 PMCID: PMC10357361 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.2742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
Importance Sixty-five million individuals in the US live in primary care shortage areas with nearly one-third of Medicare patients in need of a primary care health care professional. Periodic health examinations and preventive care visits have demonstrated a benefit for surgical patients; however, the impact of primary care health care professional shortages on adverse outcomes from surgery is largely unknown. Objective To determine if preoperative primary care utilization is associated with postoperative mortality following an emergency general surgery (EGS) operation among Black and White older adults. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a retrospective cohort study that took place at US hospitals with an emergency department. Participants were Medicare patients aged 66 years or older who were admitted from the emergency department for an EGS condition between July 1, 2015, and June 30, 2018, and underwent an operation on hospital day 0, 1, or 2. The analysis was performed during December 2022. Patients were classified into 1 of 5 EGS condition categories based on principal diagnosis codes; colorectal, general abdominal, hepatopancreatobiliary, intestinal obstruction, or upper gastrointestinal. Mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression was used in the risk-adjusted models. An interaction term model was used to measure effect modification by race. Exposure Primary care utilization in the year prior to presentation for an EGS operation. Main Outcome and Measures In-hospital, 30-day, 60-day, 90-day, and 180-day mortality. Results A total of 102 384 patients (mean age, 73.8 [SD, 11.5] years) were included in the study. Of those, 8559 were Black (8.4%) and 93 825 were White (91.6%). A total of 88 340 patients (86.3%) had seen a primary care physician in the year prior to their index hospitalization. After risk adjustment, patients with primary care exposure had 19% lower odds of in-hospital mortality than patients without primary care exposure (odds ratio [OR], 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72-0.92). At 30 days patients with primary care exposure had 27% lower odds of mortality (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.67-0.80). This remained relatively stable at 60 days (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69-0.81), 90 days (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.69-0.81), and 180 days (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.70-0.81). None of the interactions between race and primary care physician exposure for mortality at any time interval were significantly different. Conclusions and Relevance In this observational study of Black and White Medicare patients, primary care utilization had no impact on in-hospital mortality for Black patients, but was associated with decreased mortality for White patients. Primary care utilization was associated with decreased mortality for both Black and White patients at 30, 60, 90 and 180 days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanford E. Roberts
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Claire B. Rosen
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Luke J. Keele
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Elinore J. Kaufman
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Christopher J. Wirtalla
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Caitlin B. Finn
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Adora N. Moneme
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Meenakshi Bewtra
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Rachel R. Kelz
- Leonard David Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Roberts SE, Rosen CB, Keele LJ, Kaufman EJ, Wirtalla CJ, Syvyk S, Reilly PM, Neuman MD, McHugh MD, Kelz RR. Conditional Effects of Race on Operative and Nonoperative Outcomes of Emergency General Surgery Conditions. Med Care 2023; 61:587-594. [PMID: 37476848 PMCID: PMC10527290 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions can be managed both operatively or nonoperatively; however, it is unknown whether the decision to operate affects Black and White patients differentially. METHODS We identified a nationwide cohort of Black and White Medicare beneficiaries, hospitalized for common EGS conditions from July 2015 to June 2018. Using near-far matching to adjust for measurable confounding and an instrumental variable analysis to control for selection bias associated with treatment assignment, we compare outcomes of operative and nonoperative management in a stratified population of Black and White patients. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, nonroutine discharge, and 30-day readmissions. An interaction test based on a t test was used to determine the conditional effects of operative versus nonoperative management between Black and White patients. RESULTS A total of 556,087 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 59,519 (10.7%) were Black and 496,568 (89.3%) were White. Overall, 165,932 (29.8%) patients had an operation and 390,155 (70.2%) were managed nonoperatively. Significant outcome differences were seen between operative and nonoperative management for some conditions; however, no significant differences were seen for the conditional effect of race on outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The decision to manage an EGS patient operatively versus nonoperatively has varying effects on surgical outcomes. These effects vary by EGS condition. There were no significant conditional effects of race on the outcomes of operative versus nonoperative management among universally insured older adults hospitalized with EGS conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanford E. Roberts
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Claire B. Rosen
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Luke J. Keele
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Elinore J. Kaufman
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Christopher J. Wirtalla
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Solomiya Syvyk
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Patrick M. Reilly
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mark D. Neuman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Matthew D. McHugh
- Center for Health Outcomes & Policy Research, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Rachel R. Kelz
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Leonard David Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ramadan OI, Kelz RR, Sharpe JE, Wirtalla CJ, Keele LJ, Harhay MO, Roberts SE, Wang GJ. Impact of Medicaid expansion on outcomes after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78:648-656.e6. [PMID: 37116595 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.04.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Lack of insurance has been independently associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, possibly due to worse control of comorbidities and delays in diagnosis and treatment. Medicaid expansion has improved insurance rates and access to care, potentially benefiting these patients. We sought to assess the association between Medicaid expansion and outcomes after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. METHODS A retrospective analysis of Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases data from 14 states between 2012 and 2018 was conducted. The sample was restricted to first-record abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs in adults under age 65 in states that expanded Medicaid on January 1, 2014 (Medicaid expansion group) or had not expanded before December 31, 2018 (non-expansion group). The Medicaid expansion and non-expansion groups were compared between pre-expansion (2012-2013) and post-expansion (2014-2018) time periods to assess baseline demographic and operative differences. We used difference-in-differences multivariable logistic regression adjusted for patient factors, open vs endovascular repair, and standard errors clustered by state. Our primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Outcomes were stratified by insurance type. RESULTS We examined 8995 patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, including 3789 (42.1%) in non-expansion states and 5206 (57.9%) in Medicaid expansion states. Rates of Medicaid insurance were unchanged in non-expansion states but increased in Medicaid expansion states post-expansion (non-expansion: 10.9% to 9.8%; P = .346; expansion: 9.7% to 19.7%; P < .001). One in 10 patients from both non-expansion and Medicaid expansion states presented with ruptured aneurysms, which did not change over time. Rates of open repair decreased in both non-expansion and Medicaid expansion states over time (non-expansion: 25.1% to 19.2%; P < .001; expansion: 25.2% to 18.4%; P < .001). On adjusted difference-in-differences analysis between expansion and non-expansion states pre-to post-expansion, Medicaid expansion was associated with a 1.02% absolute reduction in in-hospital mortality among all patients (95% confidence interval, -1.87% to -0.17%; P = .019). Additionally, among patients who were either on Medicaid or were uninsured (ie, the patients most likely to be impacted by Medicaid expansion), a larger 4.17% decrease in in-hospital mortality was observed (95% confidence interval, -6.47% to -1.87%; P < .001). In contrast, no significant difference-in-difference in mortality was observed for privately insured patients. CONCLUSIONS Medicaid expansion was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair among all patients and particularly among patients who were either on Medicaid or were uninsured. Our results provide support for improved access to care for patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair through Medicaid expansion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar I Ramadan
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Center for Surgery and Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
| | - Rachel R Kelz
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Center for Surgery and Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - James E Sharpe
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Luke J Keele
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Michael O Harhay
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sanford E Roberts
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Center for Surgery and Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Grace J Wang
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ma KL, Sharon CE, Tortorello GN, Perry NJ, Keele LJ, Lukens JN, Karakousis GC, Miura JT. Radiation, Lymph Node Dissection, or Both: Management of Lymph Node Micrometastases from Merkel Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:4345-4355. [PMID: 37106277 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13437-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regional lymph node micrometastases from Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) can be treated with completion lymph node dissection (CLND) and/or radiation therapy (RT). It is unclear how these options compare in terms of survival benefits for patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study used data from years 2012-2019 of the National Cancer Database. Patients with MCC and clinically negative, but pathologically positive, lymph node metastases who received RT to and/or CLND of the regional lymph node basin were included. Inverse probability weight balancing was performed using covariates followed by Cox proportional hazards modeling for survival analysis. RESULTS A total of 962 patients were included [median (interquartile range) age, 74 (67-80) years, 662 (68.8%) male patients, 926 (96.3%) white patients]. The majority (63%, n = 606) had a CLND only, while 18% (n = 173) had RT only, and 19% (n = 183) had both CLND and RT. From 2016 to 2019, usage of RT only increased from 10% to 31.8%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that treatment modality was not associated with survival [RT versus CLND, hazard ratio (HR) 0.842, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.621-1.142, p = 0.269, RT+CLND versus CLND, HR 1.029, 95% CI 0.775-1.367, p = 0.844]. This persisted after balancing weights (RT versus CLND, HR 0.837, 95% CI 0.614-1.142, p = 0.262, RT+CLND versus CLND, HR 1.085, 95% CI 0.801-1.470, p = 0.599). CONCLUSIONS The usage of RT for nodal micrometastasis in MCC is increasing as compared with CLND. This strategy appears to be safe, with no significant difference in survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin L Ma
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Cimarron E Sharon
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Gabriella N Tortorello
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nikhita J Perry
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Luke J Keele
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - John N Lukens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Giorgos C Karakousis
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - John T Miura
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ma KL, Sharon CE, Tortorello GN, Perry NJ, Keele LJ, Lukens JN, Karakousis GC, Miura JT. ASO Visual Abstract: Radiation, Lymph Node Dissection, or Both: Management of Lymph Node Micrometastases from Merkel Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:4357-4358. [PMID: 37120489 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13516-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin L Ma
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Cimarron E Sharon
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Gabriella N Tortorello
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nikhita J Perry
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Luke J Keele
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - John N Lukens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Giorgos C Karakousis
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - John T Miura
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kaufman EJ, Keele LJ, Wirtalla CJ, Rosen CB, Roberts SE, Mavroudis CL, Reilly PM, Holena DN, McHugh MD, Small D, Kelz RR. Operative and Nonoperative Outcomes of Emergency General Surgery Conditions: An Observational Study Using a Novel Instrumental Variable. Ann Surg 2023; 278:72-78. [PMID: 35786573 PMCID: PMC9810765 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of operative versus nonoperative management of emergency general surgery conditions on short-term and long-term outcomes. BACKGROUND Many emergency general surgery conditions can be managed either operatively or nonoperatively, but high-quality evidence to guide management decisions is scarce. METHODS We included 507,677 Medicare patients treated for an emergency general surgery condition between July 1, 2015, and June 30, 2018. Operative management was compared with nonoperative management using a preference-based instrumental variable analysis and near-far matching to minimize selection bias and unmeasured confounding. Outcomes were mortality, complications, and readmissions. RESULTS For hepatopancreaticobiliary conditions, operative management was associated with lower risk of mortality at 30 days [-2.6% (95% confidence interval: -4.0, -1.3)], 90 days [-4.7% (-6.50, -2.8)], and 180 days [-6.4% (-8.5, -4.2)]. Among 56,582 intestinal obstruction patients, operative management was associated with a higher risk of inpatient mortality [2.8% (0.7, 4.9)] but no significant difference thereafter. For upper gastrointestinal conditions, operative management was associated with a 9.7% higher risk of in-hospital mortality (6.4, 13.1), which increased over time. There was a 6.9% higher risk of inpatient mortality (3.6, 10.2) with operative management for colorectal conditions, which increased over time. For general abdominal conditions, operative management was associated with 12.2% increased risk of inpatient mortality (8.7, 15.8). This effect was attenuated at 30 days [8.5% (3.8, 13.2)] and nonsignificant thereafter. CONCLUSIONS The effect of operative emergency general surgery management varied across conditions and over time. For colorectal and upper gastrointestinal conditions, outcomes are superior with nonoperative management, whereas surgery is favored for patients with hepatopancreaticobiliary conditions. For obstructions and general abdominal conditions, results were equivalent overall. These findings may support patients, clinicians, and families making these challenging decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elinore J. Kaufman
- Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care, and Emergency Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania
| | - Luke J. Keele
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine
| | - Christopher J. Wirtalla
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine
| | - Claire B. Rosen
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine
| | - Sanford E. Roberts
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine
| | - Catherine L. Mavroudis
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine
| | - Patrick M. Reilly
- Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care, and Emergency Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania
| | - Daniel N. Holena
- Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care, and Emergency Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew D. McHugh
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences and Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, The University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing
| | - Dylan Small
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, The Wharton School, The University of Pennsylvania
| | - Rachel R. Kelz
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Roberts SE, Rosen CB, Keele LJ, Wirtalla CJ, Syvyk S, Kaufman EJ, Reilly PM, Neuman MD, McHugh MD, Kelz RR. Rates of Surgical Consultations After Emergency Department Admission in Black and White Medicare Patients. JAMA Surg 2022; 157:1097-1104. [PMID: 36223108 PMCID: PMC9558057 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.4959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Importance A surgical consultation is a critical first step in the care of patients with emergency general surgery conditions. It is unknown if Black Medicare patients and White Medicare patients receive surgical consultations at similar rates when they are admitted from the emergency department. Objective To determine whether Black Medicare patients have similar rates of surgical consultations when compared with White Medicare patients after being admitted from the emergency department with an emergency general surgery condition. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a retrospective cohort study that took place at US hospitals with an emergency department and used a computational generalization of inverse propensity score weight to create patient populations with similar covariate distributions. Participants were Medicare patients age 65.5 years or older admitted from the emergency department for an emergency general surgery condition between July 1, 2015, and June 30, 2018. The analysis was performed during February 2022. Patients were classified into 1 of 5 emergency general surgery condition categories based on principal diagnosis codes: colorectal, general abdominal, hepatopancreatobiliary, intestinal obstruction, and upper gastrointestinal. Exposures Black vs White race. Main Outcomes and Measures Receipt of a surgical consultation after admission from the emergency department with an emergency general surgery condition. Results A total of 1 686 940 patients were included in the study. Of those included, 214 788 patients were Black (12.7%) and 1 472 152 patients were White (87.3%). After standardizing for medical and diagnostic imaging covariates, Black patients had 14% lower odds of receiving a surgical consultation (odds ratio [OR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.85-0.87) with a risk difference of -3.17 (95% CI, -3.41 to -2.92). After standardizing for socioeconomic covariates, Black patients remained at an 11% lower odds of receiving a surgical consultation compared with similar White patients (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.88-0.90) with a risk difference of -2.49 (95% CI, -2.75 to -2.23). Additionally, when restricting the analysis to Black patients and White patients who were treated in the same hospitals, Black patients had 8% lower odds of receiving a surgical consultation when compared with White patients (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.90-0.93) with a risk difference of -1.82 (95% CI, -2.18 to -1.46). Conclusions and Relevance In this study, Black Medicare patients had lower odds of receiving a surgical consultation after being admitted from the emergency department with an emergency general surgery condition when compared with similar White Medicare patients. These disparities in consultation rates cannot be fully attributed to medical comorbidities, insurance status, socioeconomic factors, or individual hospital-level effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanford E. Roberts
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Claire B. Rosen
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Luke J. Keele
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Christopher J. Wirtalla
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Solomiya Syvyk
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Elinore J. Kaufman
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Patrick M. Reilly
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Mark D. Neuman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Matthew D. McHugh
- Center for Health Outcomes & Policy Research, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Rachel R. Kelz
- Leonard David Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rosen CB, Roberts SE, Wirtalla CJ, Ramadan OI, Keele LJ, Kaufman EJ, Halpern SD, Kelz RR. Analyzing Impact of Multimorbidity on Long-Term Outcomes after Emergency General Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 235:724-735. [PMID: 36250697 PMCID: PMC9583235 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the impact of multimorbidity on long-term outcomes for older emergency general surgery patients. STUDY DESIGN Medicare beneficiaries, age 65 and older, who underwent operative management of an emergency general surgery condition were identified using Centers for Medicare & Medicaid claims data. Patients were classified as multimorbid based on the presence of a Qualifying Comorbidity Set (a specific combination of comorbid conditions known to be associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality in the general surgery setting) and compared with those without multimorbidity. Risk-adjusted outcomes through 180 days after discharge from index hospitalization were calculated using linear and logistic regressions. RESULTS Of 174,891 included patients, 45.5% were identified as multimorbid. Multimorbid patients had higher rates of mortality during index hospitalization (5.9% vs 0.7%, odds ratio [OR] 3.05, p < 0.001) and through 6 months (17.1% vs 3.4%, OR 2.33, p < 0.001) after discharge. Multimorbid patients experienced higher rates of readmission at 1 month (22.9% vs 11.4%, OR 1.48, p < 0.001) and 6 months (38.2% vs 21.2%, OR 1.48, p < 0.001) after discharge, lower rates of discharge to home (42.5% vs 74.2%, OR 0.52, p < 0.001), higher rates of discharge to rehabilitation/nursing facility (28.3% vs 11.3%, OR 1.62, p < 0.001), greater than double the use of home oxygen, walker, wheelchair, bedside commode, and hospital bed (p < 0.001), longer length of index hospitalization (1.33 additional in-patient days, p < 0.001), and higher costs through 6 months ($5,162 additional, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Older, multimorbid patients experience worse outcomes, including survival and independent function, after emergency general surgery than nonmultimorbid patients through 6 months after discharge from index hospitalization. This information is important for setting recovery expectations for high-risk patients to improve shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire B Rosen
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA
- The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sanford E Roberts
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA
- The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA
| | - Chris J Wirtalla
- The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA
| | - Omar I Ramadan
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA
| | - Luke J Keele
- The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA
| | - Elinore J Kaufman
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA
- The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA
| | - Scott D Halpern
- The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA
| | - Rachel R Kelz
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA
- The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shannon AB, Straker RJ, Carr MJ, Sun J, Landa K, Baecher K, Lynch K, Bartels HG, Panchaud R, Keele LJ, Lowe MC, Slingluff CL, Jameson MJ, Tsai KY, Faries MB, Beasley GM, Sondak VK, Karakousis GC, Zager JS, Miura JT. ASO Visual Abstract: An Internally Validated Prognostic Risk Score Model for Disease-Specific Survival in Clinical Stage I and II Merkel Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:7045-7046. [PMID: 35896923 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12293-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Adrienne B Shannon
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Richard J Straker
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael J Carr
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - James Sun
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Karenia Landa
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kirsten Baecher
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kevin Lynch
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Harrison G Bartels
- Division of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Robyn Panchaud
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Luke J Keele
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael C Lowe
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Craig L Slingluff
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Mark J Jameson
- Division of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Kenneth Y Tsai
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Mark B Faries
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Georgia M Beasley
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Vernon K Sondak
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Giorgos C Karakousis
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - John T Miura
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rosen CB, Wirtalla C, Keele LJ, Roberts SE, Kaufman EJ, Holena DN, Halpern SD, Kelz RR. Multimorbidity Confers Greater Risk for Older Patients in Emergency General Surgery Than the Presence of Multiple Comorbidities: A Retrospective Observational Study. Med Care 2022; 60:616-622. [PMID: 35640050 PMCID: PMC9262850 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the impact of multimorbidity on outcomes for older emergency general surgery patients. OBJECTIVE The aim was to understand whether having multiple comorbidities confers the same amount of risk as specific combinations of comorbidities (multimorbidity) for a patient undergoing emergency general surgery. RESEARCH DESIGN Retrospective observational study using state discharge data. SUBJECTS Medicare beneficiaries who underwent an operation for an emergency general surgery condition in New York, Florida, or Pennsylvania (2012-2013). MEASURES Patients were classified as multimorbid using Qualifying Comorbidity Sets (QCSs). Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay and discharge status. RESULTS Of 312,160 patients, a large minority (37.4%) were multimorbid. Non-QCS patients did not have a specific combination of comorbidities to satisfy a QCS, but 64.1% of these patients had 3+ comorbid conditions. Multimorbidity was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (10.5% vs. 3.9%, P <0.001), decreased rates of discharge to home (16.2% vs. 37.1%, P <0.001), and longer length of stay (10.4 d±13.5 vs. 6.7 d±9.3, P <0.001) when compared with non-QCS patients. Risks varied between individual QCSs. CONCLUSIONS Multimorbidity, defined by satisfying a specific QCS, is strongly associated with poor outcomes for older patients requiring emergency general surgery in the United States. Variation in risk of in-hospital mortality, discharge status, and length of stay between individual QCSs suggests that multimorbidity does not carry the same prognostic weight as having multiple comorbidities-the specifics of which are important in setting expectations for individual, complex patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire B. Rosen
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania; 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104
- Perelman School of Medicine; 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Chris Wirtalla
- Perelman School of Medicine; 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Luke J. Keele
- Perelman School of Medicine; 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Sanford E. Roberts
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania; 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104
- Perelman School of Medicine; 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Elinore J. Kaufman
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania; 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104
- Perelman School of Medicine; 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Daniel N. Holena
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania; 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104
- Perelman School of Medicine; 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Scott D. Halpern
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania; 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104
- Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania; 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| | - Rachel R. Kelz
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania; 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104
- Perelman School of Medicine; 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Straker RJ, Tortorello GN, Sharon CE, Keele LJ, Chu EY, Miura JT, Karakousis GC, Ming ME. Association of type II diabetes mellitus with characteristics and outcomes for patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous melanoma. J Surg Oncol 2022; 126:1263-1271. [PMID: 35899938 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) can lead to an immunosuppressed state, but whether T2DM is associated with worse outcomes for patients with melanoma has not been well studied. METHODS Consecutive patients diagnosed with clinical stage I-II cutaneous melanoma who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy at a single institution (2007-2016) were identified. Melanoma characteristics and recurrence/survival outcomes were compared between patients with and without T2DM at the time of melanoma diagnosis. RESULTS Of 1128 patients evaluated, 111 (9.8%) had T2DM (n = 94 [84.7%] non-insulin dependent [NID-T2DM]; n = 17 [15.3%] insulin dependent [ID-T2DM]). T2DM patients were more likely to be older (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, p < 0.001), male (OR 2.15, p = 0.003), have tumors >1.0 mm (OR 1.88, p = 0.023), and have microsatellitosis (OR 2.29, p = 0.030). Five-year cumulative incidence of melanoma recurrence was significantly higher for patients with ID-T2DM (46.7% ID-T2DM vs. 25.7% NID-T2DM vs. 17.1% no T2DM, p < 0.001), and on multivariable analysis, ID-T2DM was independently associated with melanoma recurrence (hazard ratio 2.57, p = 0.015). No difference in 5-year disease-specific survival was observed between groups. CONCLUSIONS ID-T2DM appears to be associated with more advanced melanoma and increased risk for melanoma recurrence. Further study as to whether this reflects differences in tumor biology or host factors is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Straker
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gabriella N Tortorello
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Cimarron E Sharon
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Luke J Keele
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Emily Y Chu
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - John T Miura
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Giorgos C Karakousis
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael E Ming
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Shannon AB, Straker RJ, Carr MJ, Sun J, Landa K, Baecher K, Lynch K, Bartels HG, Panchaud R, Keele LJ, Lowe MC, Slingluff CL, Jameson MJ, Tsai KY, Faries MB, Beasley GM, Sondak VK, Karakousis GC, Zager JS, Miura JT. An Internally Validated Prognostic Risk-Score Model for Disease-Specific Survival in Clinical Stage I and II Merkel Cell Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:7033-7044. [PMID: 35867209 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12201-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare cutaneous malignancy for which factors predictive of disease-specific survival (DSS) are poorly defined. METHODS Patients from six centers (2005-2020) with clinical stage I-II MCC who underwent sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy were included. Factors associated with DSS were identified using competing-risks regression analysis. Risk-score modeling was established using competing-risks regression on a training dataset and internally validated by point assignment to variables. RESULTS Of 604 patients, 474 (78.5%) and 128 (21.2%) patients had clinical stage I and II disease, respectively, and 189 (31.3%) had SLN metastases. The 5-year DSS rate was 81.8% with a median follow-up of 31 months. Prognostic factors associated with worse DSS included increasing age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.03, p = 0.046), male sex (HR 3.21, p = 0.021), immune compromise (HR 2.46, p = 0.013), presence of microsatellites (HR 2.65, p = 0.041), and regional nodal involvement (1 node: HR 2.48, p = 0.039; ≥2 nodes: HR 2.95, p = 0.026). An internally validated, risk-score model incorporating all of these factors was developed with good performance (AUC 0.738). Patients with ≤ 4.00 and > 4.00 points had 5-year DSS rates of 89.4% and 67.2%, respectively. Five-year DSS for pathologic stage I/II patients with > 4.00 points (n = 49) was 79.8% and for pathologic stage III patients with ≤ 4.00 points (n = 62) was 90.3%. CONCLUSIONS A risk-score model, including patient and tumor factors, based on DSS improves prognostic assessment of patients with clinically localized MCC. This may inform surveillance strategies and patient selection for adjuvant therapy trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrienne B Shannon
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Richard J Straker
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael J Carr
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - James Sun
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Karenia Landa
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kirsten Baecher
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kevin Lynch
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Harrison G Bartels
- Division of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Robyn Panchaud
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Luke J Keele
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael C Lowe
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Craig L Slingluff
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Mark J Jameson
- Division of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Kenneth Y Tsai
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Mark B Faries
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Georgia M Beasley
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Vernon K Sondak
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Giorgos C Karakousis
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - John T Miura
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Fogarty CB, Lee K, Kelz RR, Keele LJ. Biased Encouragements and Heterogeneous Effects in an Instrumental Variable Study of Emergency General Surgical Outcomes. J Am Stat Assoc 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1863220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Colin B. Fogarty
- Operations Research and Statistics Group, MIT Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | - Kwonsang Lee
- Department of Statistics, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Rachel R. Kelz
- Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Luke J. Keele
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hoffman DI, Santos PMG, Goldbach M, Keele LJ, Taunk NK, Bogen HS, Burkbauer L, Jankowitz RC, Fosnot J, Wu LC, Freedman GM, Tchou JC. Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Inflammatory Breast Cancer: Trends in Use and Clinical Outcomes 2004-2016. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:8789-8801. [PMID: 34269937 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10404-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION National guidelines specify against immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) among inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) patients. However, limited data exist regarding this practice. We report practice patterns and oncologic outcomes among nonmetastatic IBC patients receiving trimodality therapy, with or without IBR. METHODS Using the National Cancer Database, we identified nonmetastatic IBC patients treated with trimodality therapy from 2004 to 2016. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS), assessed on unadjusted analysis using Kaplan-Meier estimates and on adjusted analysis using multivariable Cox proportional hazards and inverse probability weighting (IPW) models. OS analysis was also conducted with propensity score matched (PSM) cohorts. Secondary outcomes included IBR utilization rates, time to postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT), and surgical outcomes. RESULTS 6589 women were included, including 5954 (90.4%) non-reconstructed and 635 (9.6%) IBR. Among IBR recipients, 250 (39.4%) underwent autologous reconstruction, 171 (26.9%) underwent implant-based reconstruction, and 214 (33.7%) unspecified. IBR utilization increased from 6.3% to 10.1% from 2004 to 2016 at a 4% average annual growth rate (P < 0.001). Median follow-up was 43 and 45 months for IBR and non-reconstructed patients, respectively (P = 0.29). On Cox multivariable analysis, IBR was associated with improved OS (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44-0.90, P = 0.01), but this association was not significant on IPW analysis (P = 0.06). In PSM cohorts, this association remained significant (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.40-0.92, P = 0.02). Margin status, time to PMRT, 30-day readmission, and 30-/90-day mortality did not differ between groups (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSION Although not endorsed by national guidelines, IBR is increasing among IBC patients; however, more granular data are needed to determine oncologic safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel I Hoffman
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Patricia Mae G Santos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Macy Goldbach
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Luke J Keele
- Department of Surgery, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Neil K Taunk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hannah S Bogen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Laura Burkbauer
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rachel C Jankowitz
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joshua Fosnot
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Liza C Wu
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Gary M Freedman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Julia C Tchou
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hoffman DI, Santos PMG, Goldbach M, Keele LJ, Taunk NK, Bogen HS, Burkbauer L, Jankowitz RC, Fosnot J, Wu LC, Freedman GM, Tchou JC. ASO Visual Abstract: Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Inflammatory Breast Cancer-Trends in Use and Clinical Outcomes, 2004-2016. Ann Surg Oncol 2021. [PMID: 34269945 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10475-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel I Hoffman
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Patricia Mae G Santos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Macy Goldbach
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Luke J Keele
- Department of Surgery, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Neil K Taunk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hannah S Bogen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Laura Burkbauer
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rachel C Jankowitz
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joshua Fosnot
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Liza C Wu
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Gary M Freedman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Julia C Tchou
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Perkons NR, Kim C, Boedec C, Keele LJ, Schneider C, Teitelbaum UR, Ben‐Josef E, Gabriel PE, Plastaras JP, Shulman LN, Wojcieszynski AP. Quantifying the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on gastrointestinal cancer care delivery. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2021; 5:e1427. [PMID: 34137216 PMCID: PMC8420475 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 04/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM This study quantifies how changes in healthcare utilization and delivery during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic have altered the presentation, treatment, and management of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies within an academic health system. METHODS AND RESULTS Patients diagnosed with a GI malignancy (ICD10: C15-C26) who received medical care within the health system during the observation period (first 44 weeks of 2019 and 2020) were identified for a retrospective cohort study. Deidentified patient encounter parameters were collected for this observation period and separated into pre-pandemic (weeks 1-10) and early pandemic (weeks 11-20) study periods. Difference-in-difference analyses adjusted for week-specific and year-specific effects quantified the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on care delivery between pre-pandemic and early pandemic study periods in 2020. Across all GI malignancies, the COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with a significant decline in the number of patients with new patient visits (NPVs) (p = 1.2 × 10-4 ), Radiology encounters (p = 1.9 × 10-7 ), Surgery encounters (p = 1.6 × 10-3 ), Radiation Oncology encounters (p = 4.1 × 10-3 ), and infusion visits (6.1 × 10-5 ). Subgroup analyses revealed cancer-specific variations in changes to delivery. Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) had the most significant decrease in NPVs (p = 7.1 × 10-5 ), which was significantly associated with a concomitant decrease in colonoscopies performed during the early pandemic period (r2 = 0.722, p = 2.1 × 10-10 ). CONCLUSIONS The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with significant disruptions to care delivery. While these effects were appreciated broadly across GI malignancies, CRC, diagnosed and managed by periodic screening, has been affected most acutely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Casey Kim
- Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Chris Boedec
- Data Analytics CenterPerelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Luke J. Keele
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and InformaticsPerelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Charles Schneider
- Department of MedicinePerelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | | | - Edgar Ben‐Josef
- Department of Radiation OncologyPerelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Peter E. Gabriel
- Department of Radiation OncologyPerelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - John P. Plastaras
- Department of Radiation OncologyPerelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Lawrence N. Shulman
- Department of MedicinePerelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Small DS, Firth DW, Keele LJ, Huber M, Passarella M, Lorch SA, Burris HH. Surface mining and low birth weight in central appalachia. Environ Res 2021; 196:110340. [PMID: 33098818 DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Revised: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surface mining has become a significant method of coal mining in the Central Appalachian region of the eastern United States alongside the traditional underground mining. Concerns have been raised about the health effects of this surface mining, particularly mountaintop removal mining where coal is mined upon steep mountaintops by removing the mountaintop through clearcutting forests and explosives. METHODS We used a control group design with a pretest and a posttest to assess the associations of surface mining in Central Appalachia with low birth weight and other adverse birth outcomes. The pretest period is 1977-1989, a period of low surface mining activity. We consider three posttest periods: 1990-1998, 1999-2011 and 2012-2017, with 1999-2011 as the primary analysis and the other periods as secondary analyses. Surface mining in Central Appalachia increased after 1989, partly resulting from the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 which made surface mining in Appalachia more financially attractive. For the primary analysis, we fit a logistic regression model of the primary outcome (low birth weight, <2500 g) on dummy variables for county and year; individual level maternal/infant covariates (maternal race, maternal age, infant sex and whether birth was a multiple birth); and the amount of surface mining during the year of the birth in the maternal county of residence. RESULTS Our analysis sample consisted of 783,328 infants -- 482,284 infants born from 1977 to 2017 to women residing in substantial surface mining activity counties and 301,044 infants born from 1977 to 2017 to women residing in matched control counties. Compared to the pre-period of low surface mining from 1977 to 1989, for the primary analysis posttest period of 1999-2011, there was an estimated relative increase in low birth weight in surface mining counties compared to matched control counties that was not statistically significant (odds ratio for a 5 percentage point increase in area disturbed by surface mining: 1.07, 95% confidence interval (0.96, 1.20), p-value: .22). For the secondary analysis posttest period of 1990-1998, there was no increase (odds ratio: 0.91, 95% confidence interval: (0.74, 1.13), p-value: .41). For the secondary analysis posttest period of 2012-2017, there was a statistically significant relative increase (odds ratio: 1.28, 95% confidence interval: (1.08, 1.50), p-value: .004). Qualitatively similar results were found for the outcomes of very low birth weight, preterm birth and small-for-gestational age. CONCLUSIONS We examined the hypothesis that surface mining activity in Central Appalachia contributes to low birth weight using an observational study. We found evidence in secondary analyses that surface mining was associated with low birth weight in the 2012-2017 time period and potentially beginning in the early to mid 2000's. Evidence for an association was not found prior to 2000. A potential explanation for this pattern of association is that surface mining caused an increase in low birth weight but its onset was delayed. Future research is needed to clarify the findings and if replicated, identify the mechanism necessary to mitigate the impacts of mining on adverse birth outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan S Small
- Department of Statistics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| | - Daniel W Firth
- Daniel W Firth Dba 4E Analytics, Kingsport, TN, 37664, USA
| | - Luke J Keele
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Matthew Huber
- Division of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Molly Passarella
- Division of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Scott A Lorch
- Division of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Heather H Burris
- Division of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Pomponio MK, Burkbauer L, Goldbach M, Nazarian SM, Xie F, Clark AS, Matro JM, Fox KR, Shulman LN, Keele LJ, Tchou J. Refining the indications for neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with HER2+ breast cancer: A single institution experience. J Surg Oncol 2020; 121:447-455. [PMID: 31919848 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2019] [Accepted: 12/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aim to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with early-stage HER2+ breast cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). METHODS Patients with non-metastatic HER2+ breast cancer treated from 2009 to 2018 at our institution comprised our study cohort (n = 1254). Pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as the absence of invasive disease in the breast and axilla after NAC. Log-rank, Kaplan-Meier, and inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to assess differences in disease-free and overall survival between groups stratified by AC vs. NAC and pCR vs. non-pCR. RESULTS The majority received AC (n = 787 or 62.8%) while 467 (37.2%) patients received NAC. Median follow up for AC and NAC groups was 46 and 28 months, respectively. The crude disease-free survival and overall survival of our study cohort were 92.2% and 89.1% for AC, 89.1% and 82.2% for NAC pCR, and 68.1% and 60.0% for NAC non-pCR, respectively. For clinical stage ≥IIB patients, NAC conferred a positive but statistically nonsignificant treatment effect over AC in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS After adjusting for imbalances in our subgroups, we found that, regardless of the sequence of chemotherapy (AC vs. NAC), patients with early-stage HER2+ breast cancer had excellent outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria K Pomponio
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Laura Burkbauer
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Macy Goldbach
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Susanna M Nazarian
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Fei Xie
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Amy S Clark
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jennifer M Matro
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kevin R Fox
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Lawrence N Shulman
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Luke J Keele
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Julia Tchou
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chen B, Trudeau MT, Maggino L, Ecker BL, Keele LJ, DeMatteo RP, Drebin JA, Fraker DL, Lee MK, Roses RE, Vollmer CM. Defining the Safety Profile for Performing Pancreatoduodenectomy in the Setting of Hyperbilirubinemia. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 27:1595-1605. [PMID: 31691110 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-08044-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hyperbilirubinemia is commonly observed in patients requiring pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Thus far, literature regarding the danger of operating in the setting of hyperbilirubinemia is equivocal. What remains undefined is at what specific level of bilirubin there is an adverse safety profile for undergoing PD. The aim of this study is to identify the optimal safety profile of patients with hyperbilirubinemia undergoing PD. PATIENTS AND METHODS The present work analyzed 803 PDs from 2004 to 2018. A generalized additive model was used to determine cutoff values of total serum bilirubin (TB) that were associated with increases in adverse outcomes, including 90-day mortality. Subgroup comparisons and biliary stent-specific analyses were performed for patients with TB below and above the cutoff. RESULTS TB of 13 mg/dL was associated with an increase in 90-day mortality (P = 0.043) and was the dominant risk factor on multivariate logistic regression [odds ratio (OR) 8.193, P = 0.001]. Increased TB levels were also associated with reoperations, number of complications per patient, and length of stay. Patients with TB greater than or equal to 13 mg/dL (TB ≥ 13) who received successful biliary decompression through stenting had less combined death and serious morbidity (P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative TB ≥ 13 mg/dL was associated with increased 90-day mortality after PD. Reducing a TB ≥ 13 is generally recommended before proceeding to surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bofeng Chen
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Maxwell T Trudeau
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Laura Maggino
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of Verona, The Pancreas Institute, Verona, Italy
| | - Brett L Ecker
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Luke J Keele
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ronald P DeMatteo
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Drebin
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Douglas L Fraker
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Major K Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Robert E Roses
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Charles M Vollmer
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sellers MM, Keele LJ, Sharoky CE, Wirtalla C, Bailey EA, Kelz RR. Association of Surgical Practice Patterns and Clinical Outcomes With Surgeon Training in University- or Nonuniversity-Based Residency Program. JAMA Surg 2019; 153:418-425. [PMID: 29322173 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.5449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Important metrics of residency program success include the clinical outcomes achieved by trainees after transitioning to practice. Previous studies have shown significant differences in reported training experiences of general surgery residents at nonuniversity-based residency (NUBR) and university-based residency (UBR) programs. Objective To examine the differences in practice patterns and clinical outcomes between surgeons trained in NUBR and those trained in UBR programs. Design, Setting, and Participants This observational cohort study linked the claims data of patients who underwent general surgery procedures in New York, Florida, and Pennsylvania between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2013, to demographic and training information of surgeons in the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. Patients who underwent a qualifying procedure were grouped by surgeon. Practice pattern analysis was performed on 3638 surgeons and 1 237 621 patients, representing 214 residency programs. Clinical outcomes analysis was performed on 2301 surgeons and 312 584 patients. Data analysis was conducted from February 1, 2017, to July 31, 2017. Exposures NUBR or UBR training status. Main Outcomes and Measures Inpatient mortality, complications, and prolonged length of stay. Results No significant differences were observed between the NUBR-trained surgeons and UBR-trained surgeons in age (mean, 53.3 years vs 53.7 years), sex (female, 18.2% vs 16.9%), or years of clinical experience (mean, 16.5 years vs 16.5 years). Overall, NUBR-trained surgeons compared with UBR-trained surgeons performed more procedures (median interquartile range [IQR], 328 [93-661] vs 164 [49-444]; P < .001) and performed a greater proportion of procedures in the outpatient setting (risk difference, 6.5; 95% CI, 6.4 to 6.7; P < .001). Before matching, the mean proportion of patients with documented inpatient mortality was lower for NUBR-trained surgeons than for UBR-trained surgeons (risk difference, -1.01; 95% CI, -1.41 to -0.61; P < .001). The mean proportion of patients with complications (risk difference, -3.17%; 95% CI, -4.21 to -2.13; P < .001) and prolonged length of stay (risk difference, -1.89%; 95% CI, -2.79 to -0.98; P < .001) was also lower for NUBR-trained surgeons. After matching, no significant differences in patient mortality, complications, and prolonged length of stay were found between NUBR- and UBR-trained surgeons. Conclusions and Relevance Surgeons trained in NUBR and UBR programs have distinct practice patterns. After controlling for patient, procedure, and hospital factors, no differences were observed in the inpatient outcomes between the 2 groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan M Sellers
- Center for Surgery and Healthcare Economics, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Luke J Keele
- McCourt School of Public Policy, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Catherine E Sharoky
- Center for Surgery and Healthcare Economics, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Christopher Wirtalla
- Center for Surgery and Healthcare Economics, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Elizabeth A Bailey
- Center for Surgery and Healthcare Economics, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Rachel R Kelz
- Center for Surgery and Healthcare Economics, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Pomponio MK, Keele LJ, Fox KR, Clark AS, Matro JM, Shulman LN, Tchou JC. Does time to adjuvant chemotherapy (TTC) affect outcomes in patients with triple-negative breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 177:137-143. [PMID: 31119565 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05282-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Accepted: 05/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A recent study reported that time to adjuvant chemotherapy (TTC) > 30 days was significantly associated with worse OS and DFS in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Earlier studies, however, found that worse outcomes were associated with TTC > 60 days or > 90 days. As the trend for mastectomy with reconstruction continues to rise, TTC of < 30 days is often not feasible due to wound-healing issues in some of these patients. To elucidate the impact of TTC, we sought to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with TTC in a contemporary cohort treated for TNBC at a single institution. METHODS A single-institution database was queried to identify nonmetastatic TNBC patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy from 2009 to 2018. TTC was defined as interval between date of surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy start date. Median TTC was used to divide our cohort into four quartiles; ≤ 31, 32-42, 43-56, and > 56 days. Logrank, Kaplan-Meier, and inverse probability weighting (IPW) tests were used to analyze disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS The mean TTC of our study cohort (n = 724) was 48 days (median TTC = 42 days). Black race, mastectomy without adjuvant radiation, and mastectomy with immediate reconstruction were associated with delayed TTC (all p-values < 0.01). In multivariate IPW analysis, TTC > 56 (n = 173) days did not impact DFS or OS compared to TTC ≤ 31 (n = 198) days (p = 0.27 and p = 0.21, respectively). Similar results were seen during subgroup analysis for groups identified as higher risk for delayed TTC. CONCLUSION Our results demonstrated that TTC was not significant or significantly associated with DFS or OS in patient receiving chemotherapy for operable TNBC. Our results were reassuring for patients electing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction, who may experience a longer TTC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria K Pomponio
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Luke J Keele
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kevin R Fox
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Amy S Clark
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer M Matro
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lawrence N Shulman
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Julia C Tchou
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
|
28
|
Kennedy EH, Harris S, Keele LJ. Survivor-Complier Effects in the Presence of Selection on Treatment, With Application to a Study of Prompt ICU Admission. J Am Stat Assoc 2018. [DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2018.1469990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Edward H. Kennedy
- Department of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Steve Harris
- Anaesthesia and Critical Care, University College, London Hospital, London
| | - Luke J. Keele
- McCourt School of Public Policy, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sharoky CE, Sellers M, Keele LJ, Wirtalla CJ, Dowzicky PM, Holena DN, Kelz RR. Effect Modification of Dementia on Treatment Outcomes for Acute Surgical Conditions. J Am Coll Surg 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.07.753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
30
|
Sellers M, Sharoky CE, Keele LJ, Wirtalla C, Paulson EC, Karakousis GC, Kelz RR. Does Specialization Improve Colorectal Outcomes in Emergency General Surgery? J Am Coll Surg 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.07.702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|