Are multiple-use bottles of chlorhexidine solutions at risk of contamination in joint replacement surgery?

INTRODUCTION

Chlorhexidine gluconate 2% w/v in isopropanol 70% solutions in multiple-use bottles is commonly used in surgery as a cost-effective method for skin disinfection. However, multiple-use bottles risk contamination. This study aims to test whether bacterial contamination of multiple-use bottles or their solutions occurs once open and on use between different patients.

METHODS

Consecutive samples were taken each time a chlorhexidine bottle was used over a 7-day study period. Samples were tested using blood culture, agar plate and mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

No growth was observed in 52 samples taken from 18 bottles inoculated into blood culture bottles. Four growths on agar plate culture were determined to be contaminants from the sampling process.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the use of multiple-use bottled chlorhexidine solutions as safe and cost-effective in surgical practice.

Early Warning Scores do not accurately predict mortality in sepsis: A meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVES

Early Warning Scores are used to evaluate patients in many hospital settings. It is not clear if these are accurate in predicting mortality in sepsis. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of multiple studies in sepsis. Our aim was to estimate the accuracy of EWS for mortality in this setting.

METHODS

PubMED, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science and EMBASE were searched to October 2016. Studies of adults with sepsis who had EWS calculated using any appropriate tool (e.g. NEWS, MEWS) were eligible for inclusion. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. Summary estimates were derived using HSROC analysis.

RESULTS

Six studies (4298 participants) were included. Results suggest that EWS cannot be used to predict which patients with sepsis will (positive likelihood ratio 1.79, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.11) or will not die (negative likelihood ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.78). Two studies were rated as low risk of bias and one as unclear risk of bias on all domains. The other three studies were judged at high risk of bias in one domain.

CONCLUSION

Early Warning Scores are not sufficiently accurate to rule in or rule out mortality in patients with sepsis, based on the evidence available, which is generally poor quality.