Differential risk for COVID-19 in the first wave of the disease among Spaniards and migrants from different areas of the world living in Spain

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Little is known regarding the relevance of racial/ethnic background to the risk for COVID-19 infection, particularly in Europe. We evaluated the risk of COVID-19 among migrants from different areas of the world within the context of universal free access to medical care.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a population-based cohort analysis of the cumulative incidence of PCR-confirmed COVID-19 among adult residents of Alcorcon (Spain) in the first wave of the disease up to April 25, 2020.

RESULTS

The crude cumulative incidence among migrants (n=20,419) was higher than among Spaniards (n=131,599): 8.81 and 6.51 and per 1,000 inhabitants, respectively (p<.001), but differed by region of origin. As per a negative binomial regression adjusted for age and sex, relative risk (RR) for COVID-19 for individuals from Europe, Asia, or North Africa was not significantly different from Spaniards. In contrast, a markedly increased risk was found for people from Sub-Saharan Africa (RR 3.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.42-9.41, p=.007), the Caribbean (RR 6.35, 95% CI 3.83-10.55, p<.001), and Latin America (RR 6.92, 95% CI 4.49-10.67, p<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Migrants from Sub-Saharan Africa, the Caribbean, and Latin America exhibited increased risk for COVID-19 as compared to Spaniards or migrants from Europe, North Africa, or Asia. Our data suggest that the ethnic background may play a role in risk for COVID-19. Migrants from some areas of the world may merit closer attention for both clinical and epidemiological reasons.

Differential risk for COVID-19 in the first wave of the disease among Spaniards and migrants from different areas of the world living in Spain

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Little is known regarding the relevance of racial/ethnic background to the risk for COVID-19 infection, particularly in Europe. We evaluated the risk of COVID-19 among migrants from different areas of the world within the context of universal free access to medical care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a population-based cohort analysis of the cumulative incidence of PCR-confirmed COVID-19 among adult residents of Alcorcon (Spain) in the first wave of the disease up to April 25, 2020.

RESULTS

The crude cumulative incidence among migrants (n = 20419) was higher than among Spaniards (n = 131599): 8.81 and 6.51 and per 1000 inhabitants, respectively (p <  .001), but differed by region of origin. As per a negative binomial regression adjusted for age and sex, relative risk (RR) for COVID-19 for individuals from Europe, Asia, or North Africa was not significantly different from Spaniards. In contrast, a markedly increased risk was found in people from Sub-Saharan Africa (RR 3.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.42-9.41, p =  .007), the Caribbean (RR 6.35, 95% CI 3.83-10.55, p <  .001), and Latin America (RR 6.92, 95% CI 4.49-10.67, p <  .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Migrants from Sub-Saharan Africa, the Caribbean, and Latin America exhibited increased risk for COVID-19 as compared to Spaniards or migrants from Europe, North Africa, or Asia. Our data suggest ethnic background may play a role in risk for COVID-19. Migrants from some areas of the world may merit closer attention for both clinical and epidemiological reasons.

High rates of antimicrobial co-resistance among Enterobacteriaceae: comparative analysis between clinical isolates resistant and susceptible to third-generation cephalosporins

We compared the antimicrobial co-resistance of 3,402 clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae resistant to third-generation cephalosporins (2,569 ESBL-producing and 833 AmpC overproducing) with that of 16,220 susceptible isolates, in order to determine the impact of resistance to third-generation cephalosporins on the likelihood of resistance to other antimicrobial classes. Enterobacteriaceae resistant to third-generation cephalosporins, independently of their mechanism of resistance, were significantly more resistant to other classes of antimicrobials than susceptible isolates (p <0.001). Percentages of co-resistance to ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, tobramycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole of resistant isolates were: 51%, 39%, 53% and 51%, respectively. However, among the susceptible isolates, percentages were 17%, 7%, 6% and 19%, respectively. Fosfomycin exhibited excellent in vitro activity against urinary isolates (92%), mainly against ESBL-producing organisms (90%), and is a good alternative treatment of infections caused by multidrug resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Amikacin and imipenem were the most active antimicrobials against all species tested.