[Localized tenosynovial giant cell tumor : Results from the Histopathological Arthritis Register of the German Society for Orthopedic Rheumatology]

BACKGROUND

The tenosynovial giant cell tumor (pigmented villonodular synovitis) is a proliferative, mainly benign soft tissue tumor of the tendon sheaths, bursae and joints arising from the synovia. It can be divided into circumscribed localized and destructive diffuse types. Approximately 1% of all joint diseases are due to this entity. The tumor is considered as a rarity. Mostly case studies exist. For this study the focus was set on the localized type (L-TSRZT), which accounts for 90% of the diagnoses of this tumor. Given its rarity, data are limited. Therefore, the research aim was to provide data on prevalence, primary location and sensitivity of clinical versus histopathological diagnosis in a German sample.

METHODS

Based on the Histopathological Arthritis Register of the German Society for Orthopedic Rheumatology, the data of the L‑TSRZT were retrospectively analyzed (time frame 1 January 2018-28 December 2020).

RESULTS

This database contained N = 7595 cases of arthropathy. A total of n = 45 patients with the diagnosis L‑TSRZT were identified. The prevalence of the tumor was 0.6%, 95% CI [0.4%, 0.8%], or 5.9 cases per 1000. The primary location involved the finger (48.9%). In 14 of 45 cases the diagnosis was correctly determined from the clinical side, corresponding to a sensitivity of 31.1%, 95% CI [18.2%, 46.7%].

CONCLUSION

For the first time, this paper was able to provide data on a large sample for Germany. Notably, the low sensitivity of the clinical diagnosis confirms the importance of histopathology for diagnosing L‑TSRZT.

[Histopathological diagnostics of arthrofibrosis]

Joint surgery is one of the most important and successful disciplines in surgery; nevertheless, complications still occur, especially in total knee arthroplasty and surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament. A significant disease in this context is arthrofibrosis. This review article presents the cellular and molecular pathogenetic concept of arthrofibrosis, the spectrum of histopathological diagnostics and differential diagnostics and a classification into joint endoprosthesis-associated and non-joint endoprosthesis-associated arthrofibrosis is proposed. The basis of the histopathological diagnostics is the standardized tissue removal with subsequent fixation in formalin. In the case of joint implant failure and the problem of endoprosthesis-associated arthrofibrosis, the histopathological diagnostics can be carried out according to the consensus classification of synovia-like interface membrane (SLIM). Arthrofibrosis is characterized by fibrosis, a high fibroblast cellularity with immunohistochemical detection of cytoplasmic beta catenin expression. The presence of endoprosthesis-associated arthrofibrosis is probable above a threshold of 20 beta catenin positive fibroblasts per high-power field (HPF). The diagnosis of a non-endoprosthesis-associated arthrofibrosis can be classified according to the joint pathology algorithm. Diffuse non-endoprosthesis-associated arthrofibrosis is characterized by generalized proliferation of connective tissue in the whole joint and localized circumscribed arthrofibrosis is characterized by a nodose cyclops-like fibrosis. The clarification of the cause of arthrofibrosis is based on an interdisciplinary cooperation. In addition to the histopathological diagnostics, this includes clinical, surgical, biomechanical, arthroscopic, microbiological, laboratory parameter and radiological findings.