1
|
Cozzolino D, Zhang S, Khole A, Yang Z, Ingle P, Beya M, van Jaarsveld PF, Bureš D, Hoffman LC. Identification of individual goat animals by means of near infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics analysis of commercial meat cuts. J Food Sci Technol 2024; 61:950-957. [PMID: 38487278 PMCID: PMC10933230 DOI: 10.1007/s13197-023-05890-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
Although the identification of animal species and muscles have been reported previously, no studies have been found on the use of NIR spectroscopy to identify individual animals from the analysis of commercial meat cuts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of a portable near infrared (NIR) instrument combined with classical chemometrics methods [principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares discriminant analysis PLS-DA)] to identify the origin of individual goat animals using the spectral signature of their commercial cut. Samples were collected from several carcasses (6 commercial cuts x 24 animals) sourced from a commercial abattoir in Queensland (Australia). The NIR spectra of the samples were collected using a portable NIR instrument in the wavelength range between 950 and 1600 nm. Overall, the PLS-DA models correctly classify 82% and 79% of the individual goat samples using either the goat rack or loin cut samples, respectively. The study demonstrated that NIR spectroscopy was able to identify individual goat animals based on the spectra properties of some of the commercial cut samples analysed (e.g. loin and rack). These results showed the potential of this technique to identify individual animals as an alternative to other laboratory methods and techniques commonly used in meat traceability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D. Cozzolino
- Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences (CNAFS), The University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
- The University of Queensland, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
| | - S. Zhang
- Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences (CNAFS), The University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
- The University of Queensland, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
| | - A. Khole
- Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences (CNAFS), The University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
- The University of Queensland, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
| | - Z. Yang
- Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences (CNAFS), The University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
- The University of Queensland, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
| | - P. Ingle
- Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences (CNAFS), The University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
- The University of Queensland, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
| | - M. Beya
- Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences (CNAFS), The University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
- The University of Queensland, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
| | - P. F. van Jaarsveld
- Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences (CNAFS), The University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
- The University of Queensland, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
| | - D. Bureš
- Institute of Animal Science, 104 00 Přátelství 815, 104 00 Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Food Science, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - L. C. Hoffman
- Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences (CNAFS), The University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
- The University of Queensland, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cozzolino D, Wu W, Zhang S, Beya M, van Jaarsveld PF, Hoffman LC. The ability of a portable near infrared instrument to evaluate the shelf-life of fresh and thawed goat muscles. Food Res Int 2024; 180:114047. [PMID: 38395546 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of a portable near infrared (NIR) instrument to monitor the shelf-life of four goat muscles [longissimus thoracis et lumborum (LTL), semimembranosus (SM), semitendinosus (ST) and biceps femoris (BF)] stored for up to 8 days (4 °C). The NIR spectra of the muscle samples were collected at day 0, and after 1, 4 and 8 days of storage using a MicroNIR instrument (900-1600 nm). The coefficient of determination in cross-validation (R2) and the standard error in cross validation (SECV) obtained for the prediction of days of storage ranged between 0.76 and 0.86, where the SECV ranged from 0.32 to 0.41. The best statistics in cross-validation were obtained for the prediction of days of storage in the BF samples, followed by the ST and LTL muscles. Differences in the PLS loadings for the cross-validation models were observed due to the interactions between the different muscle samples and days of storage. Overall, these results showed the potential of NIR spectroscopy to identify the time of storage in four different goat muscles. Similar data and techniques could be used to predict the remaining shelf life of meat derived from different species under storage. This information can then be used as a tool to predict and guarantee the safety of meat samples to the consumer along the meat supply and value chains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Cozzolino
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences (CNAFS), Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.
| | - W Wu
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences (CNAFS), Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - S Zhang
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences (CNAFS), Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - M Beya
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences (CNAFS), Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - P F van Jaarsveld
- The University of Queensland, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - L C Hoffman
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences (CNAFS), Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hoffman L, Ingle P, Hemant Khole A, Zhang S, Yang Z, Beya M, Bureš D, Cozzolino D. Discrimination of lamb (Ovis aries), emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae), camel (Camelus dromedarius) and beef (Bos taurus) binary mixtures using a portable near infrared instrument combined with chemometrics. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 2023; 294:122506. [PMID: 36868023 DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2023.122506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Consumers demand safe and nutritious foods at accessible prices; where issues associated with adulteration, fraud, and provenance have become important aspects to be considered by the modern food industry. There are many analytical techniques and methods available to determine food composition and quality, including food security. Among them, vibrational spectroscopy techniques are at the first line of defence (near and mid infrared spectroscopy, and Raman spectroscopy). In this study, a portable near infrared (NIR) instrument was evaluated to identify different levels of adulteration between binary mixtures of exotic and traditional meat species. Fresh meat cuts of lamb (Ovis aries), emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae), camel (Camelus dromedarius) and beef (Bos taurus) sourced from a commercial abattoir were used to make different binary mixtures (95 % %w/w, 90 % %w/w, 50 % %w/w, 10 % %w/w and 5 % %w/w) and analysed using a portable NIR instrument. The NIR spectra of the meat mixtures was analysed using principal component analysis (PCA), and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). Two isosbestic points corresponding to absorbances at 1028 nm and 1224 nm were found to be consistent across all the binary mixtures analysed. The coefficient of determination in cross validation (R2) obtained for the determination of the per cent of species in a binary mixture was above 90 % with a standard error in cross validation (SECV) ranging between 12.6 and 15 %w/w. Overall, the results of this study indicate that NIR spectroscopy can determine the level or ratio of adulteration in the binary mixtures of minced meat.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Hoffman
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences (CNAFS), Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - P Ingle
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences (CNAFS), Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia; The University of Queensland, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - A Hemant Khole
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences (CNAFS), Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia; The University of Queensland, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - S Zhang
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences (CNAFS), Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia; The University of Queensland, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - Z Yang
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences (CNAFS), Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia; The University of Queensland, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - M Beya
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences (CNAFS), Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - D Bureš
- Institute of Animal Science, 104 00 Přátelství 815, 104 00 Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Food Science, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - D Cozzolino
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences (CNAFS), Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|