2
|
Di Lisa FS, Krasniqi E, Pizzuti L, Barba M, Cannita K, De Giorgi U, Borella F, Foglietta J, Cariello A, Ferro A, Picardo E, Mitidieri M, Sini V, Stani S, Tonini G, Santini D, La Verde N, Gambaro AR, Grassadonia A, Tinari N, Garrone O, Sarobba G, Livi L, Meattini I, D’Auria G, Vergati M, Gamucci T, Pistelli M, Berardi R, Risi E, Giotta F, Lorusso V, Rinaldi L, Artale S, Cazzaniga ME, Zustovich F, Cappuzzo F, Landi L, Torrisi R, Scagnoli S, Botticelli A, Michelotti A, Fratini B, Saltarelli R, Paris I, Muratore M, Cassano A, Gianni L, Gaspari V, Veltri EM, Zoratto F, Fiorio E, Fabbri MA, Mazzotta M, Ruggeri EM, Pedersini R, Valerio MR, Filomeno L, Minelli M, Scavina P, Raffaele M, Astone A, De Vita R, Pozzi M, Riccardi F, Greco F, Moscetti L, Giordano M, Maugeri-Saccà M, Zennaro A, Botti C, Pelle F, Cappelli S, Cavicchi F, Vizza E, Sanguineti G, Tomao F, Cortesi E, Marchetti P, Tomao S, Speranza I, Sperduti I, Ciliberto G, Vici P. Adjuvant capecitabine in triple negative breast cancer patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment: real-world evidence from CaRe, a multicentric, observational study. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1152123. [PMID: 37260975 PMCID: PMC10227592 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1152123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In triple negative breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, residual disease at surgery is the most relevant unfavorable prognostic factor. Current guidelines consider the use of adjuvant capecitabine, based on the results of the randomized CREATE-X study, carried out in Asian patients and including a small subset of triple negative tumors. Thus far, evidence on Caucasian patients is limited, and no real-world data are available. Methods We carried out a multicenter, observational study, involving 44 oncologic centres. Triple negative breast cancer patients with residual disease, treated with adjuvant capecitabine from January 2017 through June 2021, were recruited. We primarily focused on treatment tolerability, with toxicity being reported as potential cause of treatment discontinuation. Secondarily, we assessed effectiveness in the overall study population and in a subset having a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Results Overall, 270 patients were retrospectively identified. The 50.4% of the patients had residual node positive disease, 7.8% and 81.9% had large or G3 residual tumor, respectively, and 80.4% a Ki-67 >20%. Toxicity-related treatment discontinuation was observed only in 10.4% of the patients. In the whole population, at a median follow-up of 15 months, 2-year disease-free survival was 62%, 2 and 3-year overall survival 84.0% and 76.2%, respectively. In 129 patients with a median follow-up of 25 months, 2-year disease-free survival was 43.4%, 2 and 3-year overall survival 78.0% and 70.8%, respectively. Six or more cycles of capecitabine were associated with more favourable outcomes compared with less than six cycles. Conclusion The CaRe study shows an unexpectedly good tolerance of adjuvant capecitabine in a real-world setting, although effectiveness appears to be lower than that observed in the CREATE-X study. Methodological differences between the two studies impose significant limits to comparability concerning effectiveness, and strongly invite further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eriseld Krasniqi
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Pizzuti
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Maddalena Barba
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Katia Cannita
- Oncology Division, Mazzini Hospital, ASL Teramo, Teramo, Italy
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Fulvio Borella
- Gynecology and Obstetrics 1, Department of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science, Sant' Anna Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Elisa Picardo
- Gynecology and Obstetrics 4, Department of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science, Sant' Anna Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Mitidieri
- Gynecology and Obstetrics 4, Department of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science, Sant' Anna Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | - Giuseppe Tonini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Biomedico, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Santini
- Medical Oncology A, Policlinico Umberto I, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicla La Verde
- Department of Oncology, Ospedale Luigi Sacco, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Rita Gambaro
- Department of Oncology, Ospedale Luigi Sacco, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonino Grassadonia
- Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry and Centre for Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST), G. D’Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Nicola Tinari
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences and Center for Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST), G. D’Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Ornella Garrone
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Vergati
- UOC of Medical Oncology, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Teresa Gamucci
- UOC of Medical Oncology, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Mirco Pistelli
- Oncology Clinic, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ospedali Riuniti Hospital, Ancona, Italy
| | - Rossana Berardi
- Oncology Clinic, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ospedali Riuniti Hospital, Ancona, Italy
| | - Emanuela Risi
- Sandro Pitigliani Medical Oncology Department, Hospital of Prato, Prato, Italy
| | - Francesco Giotta
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Giovanni Paolo II Institute, Bari, Italy
| | - Vito Lorusso
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Giovanni Paolo II Institute, Bari, Italy
| | - Lucia Rinaldi
- “Don Tonino Bello” Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Salvatore Artale
- Oncology Department, Ospedale di Gallarate, ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate, Italy
| | - Marina Elena Cazzaniga
- Phase 1 Research Centre and Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy
- Oncology Unit, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy
| | - Fable Zustovich
- Oncology Division, AULSS 1 Dolomiti, San Martino Medical Hospital, Belluno, Italy
| | - Federico Cappuzzo
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenza Landi
- Phase I Clinical Studies Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Rosalba Torrisi
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Scagnoli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Botticelli
- Medical Oncology A, Policlinico Umberto I, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Michelotti
- UO Medical Oncology I, S. Chiara Hospital, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Beatrice Fratini
- UO Medical Oncology I, S. Chiara Hospital, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Rosa Saltarelli
- Oncology Division, San Giovanni Evangelista Hospital, ASL RM5, Rome, Italy
| | - Ida Paris
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Margherita Muratore
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Cassano
- Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Gianni
- Oncology Unit Rimini, Azienda USL Romagna, Rimini, Italy
| | | | | | - Federica Zoratto
- Medical Oncology Unit, Santa Maria Goretti Hospital, Latina, Italy
| | - Elena Fiorio
- Pathology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Marco Mazzotta
- Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, Viterbo, Italy
| | | | | | - Maria Rosaria Valerio
- Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Palermo, Italy
| | - Lorena Filomeno
- Phase IV Clinical Studies Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Minelli
- Division of Oncology, San Giovanni Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Scavina
- Division of Oncology, San Giovanni Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Mimma Raffaele
- Presidio Oncologico Cassia – S. Andrea, ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Astone
- Oncology Division, San Pietro Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Roy De Vita
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Marcello Pozzi
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Filippo Greco
- Medical Oncology Unit, AULSS 9 Regione Veneto, Scaligera - Ospedale Generale Mater Salutis, Legnago, Italy
| | - Luca Moscetti
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology-Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Marcello Maugeri-Saccà
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
- Clinical Trial Center, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Zennaro
- Clinical Trial Center, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudio Botti
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Pelle
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Sonia Cappelli
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Flavia Cavicchi
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Vizza
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Tomao
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Cortesi
- Medical Oncology B, Policlinico Umberto I, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Marchetti
- Scientific Direction, IRCCS IDI, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata, Rome, Italy
| | - Silverio Tomao
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Iolanda Speranza
- Medical Oncology A, Policlinico Umberto I, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabella Sperduti
- Clinical Trial Center, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Gennaro Ciliberto
- Scientific Direction, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Patrizia Vici
- Phase IV Clinical Studies Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Piovano E, Cavallero C, Fuso L, Viora E, Ferrero A, Gregori G, Grillo C, Macchi C, Mengozzi G, Mitidieri M, Pagano E, Zola P. Diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of different strategies to triage women with adnexal masses: a prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 50:395-403. [PMID: 27706929 DOI: 10.1002/uog.17320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2016] [Revised: 09/14/2016] [Accepted: 09/21/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Transvaginal sonography (TVS) and serum biomarkers are used widely in clinical practice to triage women with adnexal masses, but the effectiveness of current biomarkers is weak. The aim of this study was to determine the best method of diagnosing patients with adnexal masses, in terms of diagnostic accuracy and economic costs, among four triage strategies: (1) the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group's simple rules (SR) for interpretation of TVS with subjective assessment (SA) by an experienced ultrasound operator when TVS results are inconclusive (referred to hereafter as SR ± SA), (2) SR ± SA and cancer antigen 125 (CA 125), (3) SR ± SA and human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) and (4) SR ± SA and the risk of malignancy algorithm (ROMA). Our main hypothesis was that the addition of the biomarkers to SR ± SA could improve triaging of these patients in terms of diagnostic accuracy (i.e. malignant vs benign). As secondary analyses, we estimated the cost effectiveness of the four strategies and the diagnostic accuracy of SR ± SA at the study hospitals. METHODS Between February 2013 and January 2015, 447 consecutive patients who were scheduled for surgery for an adnexal mass at the S. Anna and Mauriziano Hospitals in Turin were enrolled in this multicenter prospective cohort study. Preoperative TVS was performed and preoperative CA 125 and HE4 levels were measured. Pathology reports were used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the four triage strategies and the cost of each strategy was calculated. RESULTS A total of 391 patients were included in the analysis: 57% (n = 221) were premenopausal and 43% (n = 170) were postmenopausal. The overall prevalence of malignancy was 21%. SR were conclusive in 89% of patients and thus did not require SA; the overall performance of SR ± SA showed a sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 92% and positive and negative predictive values and positive and negative likelihood ratios of 74%, 95%, 10.5 and 0.19, respectively. In premenopausal women, mean cost among the four triage strategies varied from €36.41 for SR ± SA to €70.12 for SR ± SA + ROMA. The addition of biomarkers to SR ± SA showed no diagnostic advantage compared with SR ± SA alone and was more costly. Among postmenopausal women, mean cost among the four triage strategies varied from €39.52 for SR ± SA to €73.23 for SR ± SA + ROMA. Among these women, SR ± SA + CA 125 and SR ± SA + ROMA had a higher sensitivity (both 92% (95% CI, 85-99%)) than SR ± SA (81% (95% CI, 71-91%)), but SR ± SA had a higher specificity (84% (95% CI, 77-91%)). SR ± SA + CA 125 and SR ± SA + ROMA improved diagnostic accuracy, each diagnosing a third more malignant adnexal masses. In postmenopausal women, compared with SR ± SA alone, SR ± SA + CA 125 showed a net reclassification improvement (NRI) of 28.8% at an extra cost of €13.00, while the extra cost for SR ± SA + ROMA was €33.71, with a comparable gain, in terms of NRI, as that of SR ± SA + CA 125. CONCLUSIONS In our study sample, SR ± SA seems to be the best strategy to triage women with adnexal masses for surgical management. Among postmenopausal women, SR ± SA + CA 125 increased the NRI at a reasonable extra cost. Our data do not justify the use of HE4 and ROMA in the initial triage of women with adnexal masses. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Piovano
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Unit, Ospedale Martini, Turin, Italy
| | - C Cavallero
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - L Fuso
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Academic Unit, Ospedale Mauriziano, Turin, Italy
| | - E Viora
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Ultrasound and Prenatal Diagnosis, 'Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino' University Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - A Ferrero
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Academic Unit, Ospedale Mauriziano, Turin, Italy
| | - G Gregori
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Obstetrics & Gynecology Unit no. 3, 'Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino' University Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - C Grillo
- Department of Lab Medicine, Clinical Biochemistry Unit, 'Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino' University Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - C Macchi
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - G Mengozzi
- Department of Lab Medicine, Clinical Biochemistry Unit, 'Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino' University Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - M Mitidieri
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - E Pagano
- Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, 'Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino' University Hospital and CPO Piemonte, Turin, Italy
| | - P Zola
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Obstetrics & Gynecology Academic Unit no. 2, 'Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino' University Hospital, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|