Randomised study of tegafur-uracil plus leucovorin versus capecitabine as first-line therapy in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer--TLC study

BACKGROUND

Prospective data on chemotherapy for (frail) elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC) are scant. UFT/leucovorin might be as effective as and less toxic than capecitabine. We firstly randomized both agents in patients >65 years with aCRC not amenable to receive combination chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomised between first-line oral UFT/leucovorin and capecitabine in a Dutch multicentre trial. Primarily, efficacy and toxicity were determined. Secondary, quality of life (QoL) and abbreviated common geriatric assessment (aCGA) were analysed.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients were randomised with a median age of 77 years and 96% being frail. After interim analysis it was decided to stop recruitment because of low accrual. At a median follow up of 34 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were similar for both therapies, being 21 weeks (p=0.17) and 12 months (p=0.83), respectively. The overall response rates were 24% and 21%, respectively. Two patients died of possible treatment related complications in the UFT/leucovorin arm and 3 patients in the capecitabine arm. For UFT/leucovorin significantly less grade 3 or 4 hand/foot syndrome (0 vs 5) was observed. Overall, PFS was related to Charlson-comorbidity index (p=0.049), LDH (p=0.0011) and albumin (p=0.009). OS was related to LDH (p=0.0003), albumin (p=0.0001), QoLC30/CR38 (p=0.041), QoL visual analogue scale (VAS; p=0.016), and GFI (p=0.028).

CONCLUSION

UFT/leucovorin and capecitabine had similar efficacy and different toxicity profiles in frail elderly patients with aCRC. Baseline serum levels of albumin and LDH, Charlson-comorbidity index, GFI and QoL were prognostic for clinical outcome.

A randomized phase II study investigating the addition of the specific COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib to docetaxel plus carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for stage IC to IV epithelial ovarian cancer, Fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinomas: the DoCaCel study

BACKGROUND

In ovarian cancer, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) overexpression is prognostic for poor survival. We investigated the efficacy of celecoxib (C), a selective COX-2 inhibitor, added to docetaxel (Taxotere)/carboplatin (DC) in advanced ovarian cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a phase II, randomized study, 400 mg celecoxib b.i.d. was added to first-line DC treatment (DCC). Celecoxib was to be continued after DC termination up to 3 years. Study end points were tolerability, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

151 of 196 eligible patients were diagnosed with stage IIIC/IV disease. Median follow-up for patients alive was 32.3 months. Celecoxib was used during a mean of 8.5 months. Twenty-three of 97 DCC patients stopped celecoxib prematurely, mainly due to skin reactions. Complete biochemical response was achieved in 51/78 DC patients (65%) versus 57/78 DCC patients (75%, not significant). In both study arms, median PFS was 14.3 months and median OS 34 months. COX-2 was expressed in 82% of 120 tumor samples retrospectively recovered. The PFS and OS of patients with intermediate/high COX-2 expression were similar to that in the other patients.

CONCLUSION

Celecoxib did not influence PFS and OS, but interpretation of results is hampered by premature celecoxib discontinuation.

Adding the specific COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib to docetaxel plus carboplatin in first line for stage IC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer: A randomized phase II study

5545

Background: Inhibition of COX-2 reduces the growth rate of tumors in vitro and COX-2 is over-expressed in ovarian cancer, so a COX-2 inhibitor might be beneficial. Methods: After debulking surgery patients (pts) with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (FIGO IC-IV) received docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC=5 (CT) for 6–9 cycles q 3-wks and were randomized to celecoxib 400 mg BID (COX) for max three years or to control (CTR), stratified for residual tumor present in 58% vs 54%. Response rates and progression-free survival were based on CA-125 levels according to Rustin. Primary endpoints were biochemical CR (bCR)and safety, secondary progression free- (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: 183 of 201 pts enrolled were analyzed and baseline characteristics were well balanced between COX (n = 91) and control (CTR) arms (n = 93). Safety: Docetaxel and carboplatin was given full dose in 89% vs 84% pts and creatinine clearance remained stable vs baseline in both arms (96% vs 97% at Cycle 6). Toxicity grade 3–4 (COX vs CTR) was neutropenia in 26 vs 32, febrile neutropenia 12 vs 12, N/V 6 vs 5, allergy 7 vs 0 pts. Neurosensory grade 2–3 was less in COX (4 vs 13 pts, p< 0.05). Efficacy: Median duration of COX treatment was 6 months and 60% completed the combination with six or more cycles of CT. At a median follow-up of 20 months, CA-125 normalized (bCR) in COX 55/74 (74%) and CTR 49/74 (66%) pts with elevated baseline levels (n.s.). Median PFS was 17.4 vs 14.5 months (n.s.) and median survival 34.2 vs 34.7 months (n.s.). Conclusions: Celecoxib added to docetaxel/carboplatin in epithelial ovarian cancer had no effect on creatinine clearance, CA-125 response, PFS or OS. Celecoxib during CT was associated with allergic skin reactions but less neurotoxicity.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.