1
|
Prosty C, Katergi K, Sorin M, Rjeily MB, Butler-Laporte G, McDonald EG, Lee TC. Comparative efficacy and safety of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis regimens for people living with HIV: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Microbiol Infect 2024:S1198-743X(24)00168-X. [PMID: 38583518 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2024.03.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) is a common opportunistic infection among people living with HIV (PWH), particularly among new and untreated cases. Several regimens are available for the prophylaxis of PCP, including trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), dapsone-based regimens (DBRs), aerosolized pentamidine (AP), and atovaquone. OBJECTIVES To compare the efficacy and safety of PCP prophylaxis regimens in PWH by network meta-analysis. METHODS DATA SOURCES: Embase, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL from inception to June 21, 2023. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Comparative randomized controlled trials (RCTs). PARTICIPANTS PWH. INTERVENTIONS Regimens for PCP prophylaxis either compared head-to-head or versus no treatment/placebo. ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs 2. METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS Title or abstract and full-text screening and data extraction were performed in duplicate by two independent reviewers. Data on PCP incidence, all-cause mortality, and discontinuation due to toxicity were pooled and ranked by network meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses of primary versus secondary prophylaxis, by year, and by dosage were performed. RESULTS A total of 26 RCTs, comprising 55 treatment arms involving 7516 PWH were included. For the prevention of PCP, TMP-SMX was ranked the most favourable agent and was superior to DBRs (risk ratio [RR] = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.36-0.83) and AP (RR = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36-0.77). TMP-SMX was also the only agent with a mortality benefit compared with no treatment/placebo (RR = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.98). However, TMP-SMX was also ranked as the most toxic agent with a greater risk of discontinuation than DBRs (RR = 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01-1.54) and AP (7.20; 95% CI, 5.37-9.66). No significant differences in PCP prevention or mortality were detected among the other regimens. The findings remained consistent within subgroups. CONCLUSIONS TMP-SMX is the most effective agent for PCP prophylaxis in PWH and the only agent to confer a mortality benefit; consequently, it should continue to be recommended as the first-line agent. Further studies are necessary to determine the optimal dosing of TMP-SMX to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Connor Prosty
- Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
| | - Khaled Katergi
- Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Mark Sorin
- Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Guillaume Butler-Laporte
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, QC, Montréal, Canada
| | - Emily G McDonald
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada; Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada; Department of Medicine, Clinical Practice Assessment Unit, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Todd C Lee
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, QC, Montréal, Canada; Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada; Department of Medicine, Clinical Practice Assessment Unit, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alhassan B, Rjeily MB, Villareal-Corpuz V, Prakash I, Basik M, Boileau JF, Martel K, Pollak M, Foulkes WD, Wong SM. Awareness and Candidacy for Endocrine Prevention and Risk Reducing Mastectomy in Unaffected High-Risk Women Referred for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:981-987. [PMID: 37973648 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14566-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Primary prevention of breast cancer in women at elevated risk includes several strategies such as endocrine prevention and risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM). The objective of this study was to evaluate awareness of different preventive strategies across high-risk subgroups. PATIENTS AND METHODS Women referred for high risk evaluation between 2020 and 2023 completed an initial risk-assessment questionnaire that included questions around perceived lifetime risk and consideration of preventive strategies. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-squared tests were used to compare differences across different high-risk subgroups. RESULTS 482 women with a median age of 43 years (20-79 years) met inclusion criteria; 183 (38.0%) germline pathogenic variant carriers (GPV), 90 (18.7%) with high-risk lesions (HRL) on breast biopsy, and 209 (43.4%) with strong family history (FH) without a known genetic predisposition. Most high-risk women reported that they had considered increased screening and surveillance (83.7%) and lifestyle strategies (80.6%), while fewer patients had considered RRM (39.8%) and endocrine prevention (27.0%). Prior to initial consultation, RRM was more commonly considered in GPV carriers (59.4%) relative to those with HRL (33.3%) or strong FH (26.3%, p < 0.001). Based on current guidelines, 206 (43%) patients were deemed eligible for endocrine prevention, including 80.5% with HRL and 39.0% with strong FH. Prior consideration of endocrine prevention was highest in patients with HRL and significantly lower in those with strong FH (47.2% HRL versus 31.1% GPV versus 18.7% FH, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Endocrine prevention is the least considered preventive option for high-risk women, despite eligibility in a significant proportion of those presenting with HRL or strong FH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Basmah Alhassan
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
| | - Marianne Bou Rjeily
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Victor Villareal-Corpuz
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Ipshita Prakash
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
| | - Mark Basik
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Karyne Martel
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
| | - Michael Pollak
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
| | - William D Foulkes
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
- Division of Human Genetics, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada
| | - Stephanie M Wong
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada.
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alhassan B, Rjeily MB, Villareal-Corpuz V, Prakash I, Basik M, Boileau JF, Martel K, Pollak M, Foulkes WD, Wong SM. ASO Visual Abstract: Awareness and Candidacy for Endocrine Prevention and Risk-Reducing Mastectomy of Unaffected High-Risk Women Referred for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:1031-1032. [PMID: 38062296 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14671-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Basmah Alhassan
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Marianne Bou Rjeily
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Victor Villareal-Corpuz
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Ipshita Prakash
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Mark Basik
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Karyne Martel
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Michael Pollak
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - William D Foulkes
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Division of Human Genetics, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Stephanie M Wong
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rayes RF, Vourtzoumis P, Bou Rjeily M, Seth R, Bourdeau F, Giannias B, Berube J, Huang YH, Rousseau S, Camilleri-Broet S, Blumberg RS, Beauchemin N, Najmeh S, Cools-Lartigue J, Spicer JD, Ferri LE. Neutrophil Extracellular Trap-Associated CEACAM1 as a Putative Therapeutic Target to Prevent Metastatic Progression of Colon Carcinoma. J Immunol 2020; 204:2285-2294. [PMID: 32169849 DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1900240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Neutrophils promote tumor growth and metastasis at multiple stages of cancer progression. One mechanism through which this occurs is via release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). We have previously shown that NETs trap tumor cells in both the liver and the lung, increasing their adhesion and metastasis following postoperative complications. Multiple studies have since shown that NETs play a role in tumor progression and metastasis. NETs are composed of nuclear DNA-derived web-like structures decorated with neutrophil-derived proteins. However, it is unknown which, if any, of these NET-affiliated proteins is responsible for inducing the metastatic phenotype. In this study, we identify the NET-associated carcinoembryonic Ag cell adhesion molecule 1 (CEACAM1) as an essential element for this interaction. Indeed, blocking CEACAM1 on NETs, or knocking it out in a murine model, leads to a significant decrease in colon carcinoma cell adhesion, migration and metastasis. Thus, this work identifies NET-associated CEACAM1 as a putative therapeutic target to prevent the metastatic progression of colon carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roni F Rayes
- Cancer Research Program and the LD MacLean Surgical Research Laboratories, Department of Surgery, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Phil Vourtzoumis
- Cancer Research Program and the LD MacLean Surgical Research Laboratories, Department of Surgery, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Marianne Bou Rjeily
- Cancer Research Program and the LD MacLean Surgical Research Laboratories, Department of Surgery, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Rashmi Seth
- Cancer Research Program and the LD MacLean Surgical Research Laboratories, Department of Surgery, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - France Bourdeau
- Cancer Research Program and the LD MacLean Surgical Research Laboratories, Department of Surgery, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Betty Giannias
- Cancer Research Program and the LD MacLean Surgical Research Laboratories, Department of Surgery, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Julie Berube
- Meakins-Christie Laboratories, Department of Medicine, McGill University and the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Yu-Hwa Huang
- Department of Medicine, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Simon Rousseau
- Meakins-Christie Laboratories, Department of Medicine, McGill University and the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Sophie Camilleri-Broet
- Department of Pathology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada; and
| | | | - Nicole Beauchemin
- Goodman Cancer Research Center, Department of Biochemistry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1A3, Canada
| | - Sara Najmeh
- Cancer Research Program and the LD MacLean Surgical Research Laboratories, Department of Surgery, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Jonathan Cools-Lartigue
- Cancer Research Program and the LD MacLean Surgical Research Laboratories, Department of Surgery, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Jonathan D Spicer
- Cancer Research Program and the LD MacLean Surgical Research Laboratories, Department of Surgery, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Lorenzo E Ferri
- Cancer Research Program and the LD MacLean Surgical Research Laboratories, Department of Surgery, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada;
| |
Collapse
|