1
|
Meertens MM, Adam M, Beckmann A, Ensminger S, Frerker C, Seiffert M, Sinning JM, Bekeredjian R, Walther T, Beyersdorf F, Möllmann H, Balaban Ü, Eghbalzadeh K, Rudolph TK, Bleiziffer S. Non-femoral focused transaxillary access in TAVI: GARY data analysis and future trends. Clin Res Cardiol 2024:10.1007/s00392-024-02402-9. [PMID: 38436739 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-024-02402-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients not suitable for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), several access strategies can be chosen. AIM To evaluate the use and patient outcomes of transaxillary (TAx), transapical (TA), and transaortic (TAo) as alternative access for TAVI in Germany; to further evaluate surgical cutdown vs. percutaneous TAx access. METHODS All patients entered the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY) between 2011 and 2019 who underwent non-transfemoral TAVI were included in this analysis. Patients with TA, TAo, or TAx TAVI were compared using a weighted propensity score model. Furthermore, a subgroup analysis was performed for TAx regarding the percutaneous or surgical cutdown approach. RESULTS Overall, 9686 patients received a non-transfemoral access. A total of 8918 patients (92.1%) underwent TA, 398 (4.1%) TAo, and 370 (3.8%) TAx approaches. Within the TAx subgroup, 141 patients (38.1%) received subclavian cutdown, while 200 (54.1%) underwent a percutaneous approach. The TA patients had a significantly lower 30-day survival than TAx patients (TA 90.92% vs. TAx 95.59%, p = 0.006; TAo 92.22% vs. TAx 95.59%, p = 0.102). Comparing percutaneous and cutdown TAx approaches, no significant differences were seen. However, more vascular complications occurred (TA 1.8%, TAo 2.4%, TAx 12.2%; p < .001), and the hospital length of stay was shorter (TA 12.9 days, TAo 14.1 days, TAx 12 days; p < .001) after TAx access. CONCLUSION It may be reasonable to consider TAx access first in patients not suitable for TF-TAVI, because the 30-day survival was higher compared with TA access and the 1-year survival was higher compared with TAo access. It remains important for the heart teams to offer alternative access modalities for patients not amenable to the standard TF-TAVI approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max M Meertens
- Department III of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Matti Adam
- Department III of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Beckmann
- Department of Cardiac and Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Evanglish Clinical Center Niederrhein, Heart Center Duisburg, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Stephan Ensminger
- Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Vascular Surgery, University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Sie Hamburg-Kiel-Lübeck, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Frerker
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Sie Hamburg-Kiel-Lübeck, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Moritz Seiffert
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Sie Hamburg-Kiel-Lübeck, Berlin, Germany
- University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Raffi Bekeredjian
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Thomas Walther
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt and Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt a. M., Germany
| | - Friedhelm Beyersdorf
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Centre Freiburg University, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Helge Möllmann
- The Department of Internal Medicine, St.-Johannes-Hospital Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Ümniye Balaban
- Institute of Biostatistics and Mathematical Modelling, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Frankfurt a. M., Germany
| | - Kaveh Eghbalzadeh
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Tanja K Rudolph
- Department for General and Interventional Cardiology/Angiology, Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia Bochum, University Hospital of the Ruhr University, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Sabine Bleiziffer
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia, University Hospital Ruhr-University Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Macherey-Meyer S, Heyne S, Meertens MM, Braumann S, Hueser C, Mauri V, Baldus S, Lee S, Adler C. Restrictive versus high-dose oxygenation strategy in post-arrest management following adult non-traumatic cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis. Crit Care 2023; 27:387. [PMID: 37798666 PMCID: PMC10557287 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-023-04669-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Neurological damage is the main cause of death or withdrawal of care in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest (CA). Hypoxemia and hyperoxemia following CA were described as potentially harmful, but reports were inconsistent. Current guidelines lack specific oxygen targets after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). OBJECTIVES The current meta-analysis assessed the effects of restrictive compared to high-dose oxygenation strategy in survivors of CA. METHODS A structured literature search was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two competing oxygenation strategies in post-ROSC management after CA were eligible. The primary end point was short-term survival (≤ 90 days). The meta-analysis was prospectively registered in PROSPERO database (CRD42023444513). RESULTS Eight RCTs enrolling 1941 patients were eligible. Restrictive oxygenation was applied to 964 patients, high-dose regimens were used in 977 participants. Short-term survival rate was 55.7% in restrictive and 56% in high-dose oxygenation group (8 trials, RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.10, P = 0.90, I2 = 18%, no difference). No evidence for a difference was detected in survival to hospital discharge (5 trials, RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.21, P = 0.84, I2 = 32%). Episodes of hypoxemia more frequently occurred in restrictive oxygenation group (4 trials, RR 2.06, 95% CI 1.47 to 2.89, P = 0.004, I2 = 13%). CONCLUSION Restrictive and high-dose oxygenation strategy following CA did not result in differences in short-term or in-hospital survival. Restrictive oxygenation strategy may increase episodes of hypoxemia, even with restrictive oxygenation targets exceeding intended saturation levels, but the clinical relevance is unknown. There is still a wide gap in the evidence of optimized oxygenation in post-ROSC management and specific targets cannot be concluded from the current evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Macherey-Meyer
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
| | - S Heyne
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - M M Meertens
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
- Center of Cardiology, Cardiology III -Angiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| | - S Braumann
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - C Hueser
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Clinic II for Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Emergency Department, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - V Mauri
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - S Baldus
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - S Lee
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - C Adler
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Meertens MM, Tenorio ER, Lemmens CC, Marcondes GB, Lima GBB, Schurink GWH, Mendes BC, Oderich GS, Mees BME. Safety of Percutaneous Femoral Access for Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Through Previously Surgically Exposed or Repaired Femoral Arteries. J Endovasc Ther 2023; 30:730-738. [PMID: 35514295 PMCID: PMC10503241 DOI: 10.1177/15266028221092980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Percutaneous femoral artery access is being increasingly used in endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). The technique can be challenging in patients with previously surgically exposed or repaired femoral arteries because of excessive scar tissue. However, a successful percutaneous approach may cause less morbidity than a "re-do" open femoral approach. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of prior open surgical femoral exposure on technical success and clinical outcomes of percutaneous approach. METHODS This study retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients who underwent percutaneous EVAR between 2010 and 2020 at 2 major aortic centers. Patients were divided into 2 groups (with or without prior open surgical femoral access) for analysis of clinical outcomes. Only punctures with sheaths ≥12Fr were included for analysis. The access and (pre)closure techniques were similar in both institutions. Primary end points were intraoperative technical success, access-related revision, and access complications. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify determinants of conversion to open approach and femoral access complications in intact and re-do groins. RESULTS A total of 632 patients underwent percutaneous (complex) EVAR: 98 had prior open surgical femoral access and 534 patients underwent de novo femoral percutaneous access. A total of 1099 femoral artery punctures were performed: 149 in re-do and 950 in intact groins. The extent of endovascular repair included 159 infrarenal, 82 thoracic, 368 fenestrated/branched, and 23 iliac branch devices. No significant differences were seen in technical success (re-do 93.3% vs intact 95.3%, p=0.311), access-related surgical revision (0.7% vs 0.6%, p=0.950), and access complications (2.7% vs 4.0%, p=0.443). For the whole group, significant predictors for access complications in multivariate analyses were main access site (odds ratio [OR] 2.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07%-5.35%; p=0.033) and increase of the procedure time per hour (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.34%-2.04%; p<0.001), while increase in sheath-vessel ratio had a protective effect (OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.127%-0.85%; p=0.021). Surgical conversion was predicted by main access site (OR 2.32; 95% CI 1.28%-4.19%; p=0.007) and calcification of 50% to 75% of the circumference of the access vessel (OR 3.29; 95% CI 1.38%-7.86%; p=0.005). CONCLUSION Within our population prior open surgical femoral artery exposure or repair had no negative impact on the technical success and clinical outcomes of percutaneous (complex) endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max M. Meertens
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- European Vascular Center Aachen-Maastricht, Aachen, Germany
| | - Emanuel R. Tenorio
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Texas Health Science, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Charlotte C. Lemmens
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- European Vascular Center Aachen-Maastricht, Aachen, Germany
| | - Giulianna B. Marcondes
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Texas Health Science, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Guilherme B. B. Lima
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Texas Health Science, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Geert Willem H. Schurink
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- European Vascular Center Aachen-Maastricht, Aachen, Germany
| | - Bernardo C. Mendes
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Gustavo S. Oderich
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Texas Health Science, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Barend M. E. Mees
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- European Vascular Center Aachen-Maastricht, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Macherey-Meyer S, Meertens MM, Heyne S, Braumann S, Tichelbäcker T, Wienemann H, Mauri V, Baldus S, Adler C, Lee S. Optical coherence tomography-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis. Clin Res Cardiol 2023:10.1007/s00392-023-02272-7. [PMID: 37524839 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-023-02272-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is standard of care in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) suitable for interventional revascularization. Intracoronary imaging by optical coherence tomography (OCT) expanded treatment approaches adding diagnostic information and contributing to stent optimization. OBJECTIVES This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of OCT-guided vs. angiography-guided PCI in treatment of ACS. METHODS A structured literature search was performed. All controlled trials evaluating OCT-guided vs. angiography-guided PCI in patients with ACS were eligible. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTS Eight studies enrolling 2612 patients with ACS were eligible. 1263 patients underwent OCT-guided and 1,349 patients angiography-guided PCI. OCT guidance was associated with a 30% lower likelihood of MACE (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53-0.93, p = 0.01, I2 = 1%). OCT-guided PCI was also associated with significantly decreased cardiac mortality (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25-0.96, p = 0.04, I2 = 0%). There was no detectable difference in all-cause mortality (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.51-2.31, p = 0.83, I2 = 0). Patients in OCT-guided group less frequently required target lesion revascularization (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.07-0.95, p = 0.04, I2 = 0%). Analysis of myocardial infarction did not result in significant treatment differences. In subgroup or sensitivity analysis the observed advantages of OCT-guided PCI were not replicable. CONCLUSION The evidence suggests that PCI guidance with OCT in ACS decreases MACE, cardiac death and target lesion revascularization compared to angiography. On individual study level, in subgroup or sensitivity analyses these advantages were not thoroughly replicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Macherey-Meyer
- Faculty of Medicine, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
| | - M M Meertens
- Faculty of Medicine, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - S Heyne
- Faculty of Medicine, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - S Braumann
- Faculty of Medicine, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - T Tichelbäcker
- Faculty of Medicine, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - H Wienemann
- Faculty of Medicine, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - V Mauri
- Faculty of Medicine, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - S Baldus
- Faculty of Medicine, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - C Adler
- Faculty of Medicine, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - S Lee
- Faculty of Medicine, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Macherey-Meyer S, Heyne S, Meertens MM, Braumann S, Niessen SF, Baldus S, Lee S, Adler C. Outcome of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients Stratified by Pre-Clinical Loading with Aspirin and Heparin: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis. J Clin Med 2023; 12:3817. [PMID: 37298012 PMCID: PMC10253358 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12113817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has a high prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease and total coronary occlusion. Consequently, these patients are frequently loaded with antiplatelets and anticoagulants before hospital arrival. However, OHCA patients have multiple non-cardiac causes and high susceptibility for bleeding. In brief, there is a gap in the evidence for loading in OHCA patients. Objective: The current analysis stratified the outcome of patients with OHCA according to pre-clinical loading. Material and Methods: In a retrospective analysis of an all-comer OHCA registry, patients were stratified by loading with aspirin (ASA) and unfractionated heparin (UFH). Bleeding rate, survival to hospital discharge and favorable neurological outcomes were measured. Results: Overall, 272 patients were included, of whom 142 were loaded. Acute coronary syndrome was diagnosed in 103 patients. One-third of STEMIs were not loaded. Conversely, 54% with OHCA from non-ischemic causes were pretreated. Loading was associated with increased survival to hospital discharge (56.3 vs. 40.3%, p = 0.008) and a more favorable neurological outcome (80.7 vs. 62.6% p = 0.003). Prevalence of bleeding was comparable (26.8 vs. 31.5%, p = 0.740). Conclusions: Pre-clinical loading did not increase bleeding rates and was associated with favorable survival. Overtreatment of OHCA with non-ischemic origin, but also undertreatment of STEMI-OHCA were documented. Loading without definite diagnosis of sustained ischemia is debatable in the absence of reliable randomized controlled data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sascha Macherey-Meyer
- Clinic III for Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany; (S.H.); (M.M.M.); (S.B.); (S.F.N.); (S.B.); (S.L.); (C.A.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Heyne S, Macherey S, Meertens MM, Braumann S, Nießen FS, Tichelbäcker T, Baldus S, Adler C, Lee S. Coronary angiography after cardiac arrest without ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a network meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2023; 44:1040-1054. [PMID: 36300362 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS This network meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of early coronary angiography (CAG) compared with selective CAG (late and no CAG) for patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest without ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTE-OHCA). METHODS AND RESULTS A systematic literature search was performed using the EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science databases without restrictions on publication date. The last search was performed on 15 July 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRS) comparing the effect of early CAG to selective CAG after NSTE-OHCA on survival and/or neurological outcomes were included. Meta-analyses were performed based on a DerSimonian-Laird random effects model. A total of 18 studies were identified by the literature search. After the exclusion of two studies due to high risk of bias, 16 studies (six RCTs, ten NRS) were included in the final analyses. Meta-analyses showed a statistically significant increase in survival after early CAG compared with selective CAG in the overall analysis [OR: 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): (1.12-1.76), P < 0.01, I2 = 68%]. This effect was lost in the subgroup analysis of RCTs [OR: 0.89, 95% CI: (0.73-1.10), P = 0.29, I2 = 0%]. Random effects model network meta-analysis of NRS based on a Bayesian method showed statistically significant increased survival after late compared with early CAG [OR: 4.20, 95% CI: (1.22, 20.91)]. CONCLUSION The previously reported superiority of early CAG after NSTE-OHCA is based on NRS at high risk of selection and survivorship bias. The meta-analysis of RCTs does not support routinely performing early CAG after NSTE-OHCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Heyne
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Sascha Macherey
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Max M Meertens
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Simon Braumann
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Franz S Nießen
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Tobias Tichelbäcker
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Stephan Baldus
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Christoph Adler
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Samuel Lee
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Clinic III for Internal Medicine, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Palmerini T, Saia F, Kim WK, Renker M, Iadanza A, Fineschi M, Bruno AG, Ghetti G, Vanhaverbeke M, Søndergaard L, De Backer O, Romagnoli E, Burzotta F, Trani C, Adrichem R, Van Mieghem NM, Nardi E, Chietera F, Orzalkiewicz M, Tomii D, Pilgrim T, Aranzulla TC, Musumeci G, Adam M, Meertens MM, Taglieri N, Marrozzini C, Alvarez Covarrubias HA, Joner M, Nardi G, Di Muro FM, Di Mario C, Loretz L, Toggweiler S, Gallitto E, Gargiulo M, Testa L, Bedogni F, Berti S, Ancona MB, Montorfano M, Leone A, Savini C, Pacini D, Gmeiner J, Braun D, Nerla R, Castriota F, De Carlo M, Petronio AS, Barbanti M, Costa G, Tamburino C, Leone PP, Reimers B, Stefanini G, Sudo M, Nickenig G, Piva T, Scotti A, Latib A, Vercellino M, Porto I, Codner P, Kornowski R, Bartorelli AL, Tarantini G, Fraccaro C, Abdel-Wahab M, Grube E, Galié N, Stone GW. Vascular Access in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease Undergoing TAVR: The Hostile Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 16:396-411. [PMID: 36858659 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal access route in patients with severe peripheral artery disease (PAD) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains undetermined. OBJECTIVES This study sought to compare clinical outcomes with transfemoral access (TFA), transthoracic access (TTA), and nonthoracic transalternative access (TAA) in TAVR patients with severe PAD. METHODS Patients with PAD and hostile femoral access (TFA impossible, or possible only after percutaneous treatment) undergoing TAVR at 28 international centers were included in this registry. The primary endpoint was the propensity-adjusted risk of 30-day major adverse events (MAE) defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), or main access site-related Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 major vascular complications. Outcomes were also stratified according to the severity of PAD using a novel risk score (Hostile score). RESULTS Among the 1,707 patients included in the registry, 518 (30.3%) underwent TAVR with TFA after percutaneous treatment, 642 (37.6%) with TTA, and 547 (32.0%) with TAA (mostly transaxillary). Compared with TTA, both TFA (adjusted HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.45-0.75) and TAA (adjusted HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.47-0.78) were associated with lower 30-day rates of MAE, driven by fewer access site-related complications. Composite risks at 1 year were also lower with TFA and TAA compared with TTA. TFA compared with TAA was associated with lower 1-year risk of stroke/TIA (adjusted HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.24-0.98), a finding confined to patients with low Hostile scores (Pinteraction = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with PAD undergoing TAVR, both TFA and TAA were associated with lower 30-day and 1-year rates of MAE compared with TTA, but 1-year stroke/TIA rates were higher with TAA compared with TFA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tullio Palmerini
- Cardiology Unit, Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Francesco Saia
- Cardiology Unit, Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | | | - Alessandro Iadanza
- UOSA Cardiologia Interventistica, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
| | - Massimo Fineschi
- UOSA Cardiologia Interventistica, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
| | - Antonio Giulio Bruno
- Cardiology Unit, Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gabriele Ghetti
- Cardiology Unit, Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Maarten Vanhaverbeke
- Heart Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars Søndergaard
- Heart Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ole De Backer
- Heart Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Enrico Romagnoli
- U.O.C. di Interventistica Cardiologica e Diagnostica Invasiva, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Burzotta
- U.O.C. di Interventistica Cardiologica e Diagnostica Invasiva, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Trani
- U.O.C. di Interventistica Cardiologica e Diagnostica Invasiva, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Rik Adrichem
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nicolas M Van Mieghem
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Elena Nardi
- Cardiology Unit, Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Chietera
- Cardiology Unit, Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mateusz Orzalkiewicz
- Cardiology Unit, Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Daijiro Tomii
- Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Pilgrim
- Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Matti Adam
- Klinik III für Innere Medizin - Kardiologie, Pneumologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, University Hospital Cologne - Heart Center, Cologne, Germany
| | - Max M Meertens
- Klinik III für Innere Medizin - Kardiologie, Pneumologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, University Hospital Cologne - Heart Center, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nevio Taglieri
- Cardiology Unit, Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Cinzia Marrozzini
- Cardiology Unit, Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Hector Alfonso Alvarez Covarrubias
- German Heart Centre Munich, Munich, Germany; Hospital de Cardiología, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Institutio Mexicano de Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | | | | | - Lucca Loretz
- Cardiology, Heart Center Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | | | - Enrico Gallitto
- Vascular Surgery, Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mauro Gargiulo
- Vascular Surgery, Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Luca Testa
- Coronary Revascularisation Unit, IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato, S. Donato Milanese, Italy
| | - Francesco Bedogni
- Coronary Revascularisation Unit, IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato, S. Donato Milanese, Italy
| | - Sergio Berti
- Unit of Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiology, C.N.R. Reg. Toscana G. Monasterio Foundation, Ospedale del Cuore, Massa, Italy
| | - Marco B Ancona
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Montorfano
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Leone
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Carlo Savini
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Davide Pacini
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Jonas Gmeiner
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Munich, Medical Faculty, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Braun
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Munich, Medical Faculty, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Marco De Carlo
- Cardiothoracic and Vascular Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Anna Sonia Petronio
- Cardiothoracic and Vascular Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marco Barbanti
- Division of Cardiology, Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Giuliano Costa
- Division of Cardiology, Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Corrado Tamburino
- Division of Cardiology, Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | | | - Bernhard Reimers
- Cardio Center, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Giulio Stefanini
- Cardio Center, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Mitsumasa Sudo
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Herzzentrum Bonn, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Georg Nickenig
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Herzzentrum Bonn, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Tommaso Piva
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I - GM Lancisi, Torette, Italy
| | - Andrea Scotti
- Montefiore Einstein Center for Heart and Vascular Care, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA; Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA
| | - Azeem Latib
- Montefiore Einstein Center for Heart and Vascular Care, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA; Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA
| | - Matteo Vercellino
- Cardiology Unit, Cardio-Thoraco Vascular Department, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Italo Porto
- Cardiology Unit, Cardio-Thoraco Vascular Department, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | | | | | - Antonio L Bartorelli
- Centro Cardiologico Monzino, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tarantini
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Chiara Fraccaro
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Eberhard Grube
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Herzzentrum Bonn, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Nazzareno Galié
- Cardiology Unit, Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gregg W Stone
- Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Meertens MM, Tichelbäcker T, Macherey-Meyer S, Heyne S, Braumann S, Nießen SF, Baldus S, Adler C, Lee S. Meta-analysis of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in combination with intra-aortic balloon pump vs. extracorporeal membrane oxygenation only in patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 9:1104357. [PMID: 36741852 PMCID: PMC9889933 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1104357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Incidence and mortality of cardiogenic shock (CS) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remain high despite substantial therapy improvements in acute percutaneous coronary intervention over the last decades. Unloading the left ventricle in patients with Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) can be performed by using an intra-aortic balloon pumps' (IABP) afterload reduction, which might be especially beneficial in AMI patients with CS. Objective The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the effect of VA-ECMO + IABP vs. VA-ECMO treatment on the mortality of patients with CS due to AMI. Methods A systematic literature search was performed using EMBASE, COCHRANE, and MEDLINE databases. Studies comparing the effect of VA-ECMO + IABP vs. VA-ECMO on mortality of patients with AMI were included. Meta-analyses were performed to analyze the effect of the chosen treatment on 30-day/in-hospital mortality. Results Twelve studies were identified by the literature search, including a total of 5,063 patients, 81.5% were male and the mean age was 65.9 years. One thousand one hundred and thirty-six patients received treatment with VA-ECMO in combination with IABP and 2,964 patients received VA-ECMO treatment only. The performed meta-analysis showed decreased mortality at 30-days/in-hospital after VA-ECMO + IABP compared to VA-ECMO only for patients with cardiogenic shock after AMI (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.30-0.44, P≤0.001). Combination of VA-ECMO + IABP was associated with higher rates of weaning success (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.16-0.53, P < 0.001) without an increase of vascular access complications (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.35-2.08, P = 0.72). Conclusion In this meta-analysis, combination therapy of VA-ECMO + IABP was superior to VA-ECMO only therapy in patients with CS due to AMI. In the absence of randomized data, these results are hypothesis generating only.
Collapse
|
9
|
Meertens MM, van Herwaarden JA, de Vries JPPM, Verhagen HJM, van der Laan MJ, Reijnen MMPJ, Schurink GWH, Mees BME. Multicenter Experience of Upper Extremity Access in Complex Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair. J Vasc Surg 2022; 76:1150-1159. [PMID: 35709857 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.04.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Upper extremity access (UEA) for antegrade cannulation of aortic side branches is a relevant part of endovascular treatment of complex aortic aneurysms and can be achieved using several techniques, sites and sides. The purpose of this study was to evaluate different UEA strategies in a multicenter registry of complex endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS In six aortic centers in the Netherlands, all endovascular aortic procedures from 2006 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who received upper extremity access during complex EVAR were included. Primary outcome was a composite endpoint of any access complication, excluding minor hematomas. Secondary outcomes were access characteristics, access complications considered individually, access reinterventions and incidence of ischemic cerebrovascular events. RESULTS 417 patients underwent 437 UEA for 303 fenestrated/branched EVARs, and 114 chimney EVARs. Twenty patients had bilateral, 295 left-sided, and 102 right-sided UEA. 413 approaches were performed surgically and 24 percutaneously. Distal brachial access was used in 89 cases, medial brachial in 149, proximal brachial in 140 and axillary access in 59 cases. No significant differences regarding the composite endpoint of access complications were seen (DBA 11.3% vs. MBA 6.7% vs. PBA 13.6% vs. AA 10.2%; p=.29). Postoperative neuropathy occurred most after proximal brachial access (DBA 1.1% vs. MBA 1.3% vs. PBA 9.3 % vs. AA 5.1%; p=.003). There were no differences in cerebrovascular complications between access sides (right 5.9% vs. left 4.1% vs. bilateral 5%; p=.75). Significantly more overall access complications were seen after a percutaneous approach (29.2% vs. 6.8%; p=.002). In multivariate analysis the risk for access complications after open approach was decreased by male gender (OR 0.27; CI 95% 0.10 - 0.72; p= .009), while an increase in age per year (OR 1.08; CI 95% 1.004 - 1.179; p=.039) and diabetes mellitus type 2 (OR 3.70; CI 95% 1.20 - 11.41; p= .023) increased the risk. CONCLUSION Between the four access localizations, there were no differences in overall access complications. Female gender, diabetes mellitus type 2 and ageing increased the risk for access complications after surgical approach. Furthermore, a percutaneous upper extremity access resulted in higher complication rates than a surgical approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M M Meertens
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department III of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - J A van Herwaarden
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J P P M de Vries
- Department of Vascular Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - H J M Verhagen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M J van der Laan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - M M P J Reijnen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, and Multi-Modality Medical Imaging Group, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - G W H Schurink
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; European Vascular Center Aachen-Maastricht, the Netherlands/ Germany
| | - B M E Mees
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; European Vascular Center Aachen-Maastricht, the Netherlands/ Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Meertens MM, Macherey S, Asselberghs S, Lee S, Schipper JH, Mees B, Eitel I, Baldus S, Frerker C, Schmidt T. Correction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the cerebrovascular event incidence after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Clin Res Cardiol 2022; 111:969-970. [PMID: 35394168 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-022-02018-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Max M Meertens
- Department III of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sascha Macherey
- Department III of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sebastiaan Asselberghs
- Department of Pathology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Samuel Lee
- Department III of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jan Hendrik Schipper
- Department III of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Barend Mees
- Department of Pathology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ingo Eitel
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Stephan Baldus
- Department III of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christian Frerker
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Tobias Schmidt
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Meertens MM, Macherey S, Asselberghs S, Lee S, Schipper JH, Mees B, Eitel I, Baldus S, Frerker C, Schmidt T. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the cerebrovascular event incidence after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Clin Res Cardiol 2022; 111:843-858. [PMID: 35298700 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-022-01997-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Periinterventional stroke is one of the most feared potential complication, among patients treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The purpose of this review was to investigate the incidence of cerebrovascular events and the influence of postinterventional neurologic check-up in patients undergoing TAVI. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the PRISMA guideline. Three separate electronic searches of the public domains Medline and Clinicaltrials.gov were performed to identify the 30-day incidence of stroke within randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and registries for patients undergoing a TAVI procedure. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the 30-day incidence of stroke within RCTs. Furthermore, we pooled the RCTs in which a scheduled neurological check-up was conducted or not to investigate the effect of this intervention. RESULTS Twenty-three studies including 399,532,491 TAVI patients were included, 6370 from RCTs, 857,833 from cerebral-embolic protection device RCTs and 392,288 were adopted from registries. The mean 30-day incidence of stroke among all reviewed studies was 2.33%. In RCTs evaluating TAVI the pooled stroke incidence was 3.86%, among RCTs focused CEP the incidence was 6.4436% and in registries the incidence was 2.29%. Ten RCTs conducted scheduled neurological check-ups, the incidence in these was 4.03% and among the remaining RCTs it was 2.47%. In the meta-analysis, the pooled 30-day stroke incidence was 3.61% (95% CI 2.57-4.79%). CONCLUSION This systematic review demonstrates that the stroke incidences following TAVI differ strongly according to the study design and neurological follow-up. Intense neurological testing increases the incidence of a stroke after TAVI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max M Meertens
- Department III of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sascha Macherey
- Department III of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sebastiaan Asselberghs
- Department of Pathology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Samuel Lee
- Department III of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jan Hendrik Schipper
- Department III of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Barend Mees
- Department of Pathology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ingo Eitel
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Stephan Baldus
- Department III of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christian Frerker
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Tobias Schmidt
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Meertens MM, Lemmens CC, Oderich GS, Schurink GWH, Mees BME. Cerebrovascular Complications After Upper Extremity Access for Complex Aortic Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2020; 43:186-195. [PMID: 31591688 PMCID: PMC6965343 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-019-02330-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2019] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to review the risk of developing cerebrovascular complications from upper extremity access during endovascular treatment of complex aortic aneurysms. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the PRISMA guideline. An electronic search of the public domains Medline (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), Web of Science and Cochrane Library was performed to identify studies related to the treatment of aortic aneurysms involving upper extremity access. Meta-analysis was used to compare the rate of cerebrovascular event after left, right and bilateral upper extremity access. Results are presented as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS Thirteen studies including 1276 patients with complex endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms using upper extremity access were included in the systematic review. Left upper extremity access (UEA) was used in 1028 procedures, right access in 148 and bilateral access in 100 procedures. The rate of cerebrovascular complications for patients treated through left UEA was 1.7%, through right UEA 4% and through bilateral UEA 5%. In the meta-analysis, we included seven studies involving 645 patients treated with a left upper extremity access, 87 patients through a right and 100 patients through a bilateral upper extremity access. Patients, who underwent right-sided (RR 5.01, 95% CI 1.51-16.58, P = 0.008) or bilateral UEA (RR 4.57, 95% CI 1.23-17.04, P = 0.02), had a significantly increased risk of cerebrovascular events compared to those who had a left-sided approach. CONCLUSION Left upper extremity access is associated with a significantly lower rate of cerebrovascular complications as compared to right or bilateral upper extremity access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max M Meertens
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte C Lemmens
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Advanced Endovascular Aortic Research Program, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Geert W H Schurink
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- European Vascular Center Aachen-Maastricht, Aachen, Germany
- European Vascular Center Aachen-Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Barend M E Mees
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- European Vascular Center Aachen-Maastricht, Aachen, Germany.
- European Vascular Center Aachen-Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of the suture-mediated ProGlide device in closure of the brachial artery after endovascular interventions. Materials and Methods: From 2016 to 2017, a pilot study was performed using the ProGlide to achieve hemostasis after percutaneous access of distal brachial arteries >4 mm in diameter. In an interim analysis, the results were compared to a matched control group taken from a 60-patient historical cohort who underwent brachial artery access and manual compression to achieve hemostasis between 2014 and 2017. The primary outcome was access-related reintervention and the secondary outcome was the incidence of access-site complications. Results: Seven patients (mean age 67.9 years; 6 men) were enrolled in the study before it was stopped in 2017. Four patients experienced 6 access-site complications (neuropathy, hematoma, occlusion, and pseudoaneurysm). These resulted in 3 access-related reinterventions: surgical evacuation of a hematoma, thrombectomy of the occluded brachial artery, and surgical repair of the pseudoaneurysm. In the interim comparison to the 19 matched patients (mean age 61.9 years; 6 men), the ProGlide group had proportionally more patients experiencing access-related complications (57% vs 16% for manual compression, p=0.035) and resultant reinterventions (43% vs 11%, p=0.064). Based on this data the trial was stopped. Conclusion: Considering this experience, it is not advisable to use the ProGlide in transbrachial endovascular interventions due to the high incidence of complications and access-related reinterventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max M Meertens
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Michiel W de Haan
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Geert W H Schurink
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,European Vascular Center Aachen-Maastricht, the Netherlands/Germany
| | - Barend M E Mees
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,European Vascular Center Aachen-Maastricht, the Netherlands/Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Meertens MM, Ng E, Loh SEK, Samuel M, Mees BME, Choong AMTL. Transradial Approach for Aortoiliac and Femoropopliteal Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Endovasc Ther 2018; 25:599-607. [PMID: 30086665 PMCID: PMC6136071 DOI: 10.1177/1526602818792854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To present a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the transradial approach for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal interventions to the traditional transfemoral access. METHODS A search of the public domain databases MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library Databases was performed to identify studies related to the use of the transradial approach for infra-aortic procedures. Meta-analysis was used to compare the transradial to the transfemoral route in terms of procedure success, complications, procedure parameters, and hospital length of stay. Results are presented as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS Nineteen studies containing 638 patients with transradial access for lower limb interventions were selected. Lesions were treated from the aortic bifurcation down to the popliteal artery. The mean technical success rate was 90.9%, conversion to a transfemoral approach was necessary in 9.9%, and complications were reported in 1.9%. The meta-analysis included 4 comparative studies involving 114 transradial and 208 transfemoral procedures. There was no significant advantage of either approach in terms of procedure success (OR 5.0, 95% CI 0.49 to 50.83, p=0.17), but the risk of developing a complication was significantly lower (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.86, p=0.03) with the transradial approach. CONCLUSION Transradial access for lower limb endovascular interventions can be performed with comparable technical success and a lower overall complication profile compared to transfemoral access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max M. Meertens
- SingVaSC, Singapore Vascular Surgical
Collaborative, Singapore
- Department of Vascular Surgery,
Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- European Vascular Center
Aachen-Maastricht, Aachen, Germany
| | - Eugene Ng
- SingVaSC, Singapore Vascular Surgical
Collaborative, Singapore
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Westmead
Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Stanley E. K. Loh
- SingVaSC, Singapore Vascular Surgical
Collaborative, Singapore
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging,
National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Miny Samuel
- SingVaSC, Singapore Vascular Surgical
Collaborative, Singapore
- Systematic Review Unit, Yong Loo Lin
School of Medicine, National University of Singapore
| | - Barend M. E. Mees
- Department of Vascular Surgery,
Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- European Vascular Center
Aachen-Maastricht, Aachen, Germany
| | - Andrew M. T. L. Choong
- SingVaSC, Singapore Vascular Surgical
Collaborative, Singapore
- Division of Vascular Surgery, National
University Heart Centre, Singapore
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin
School of Medicine, National University of Singapore
| |
Collapse
|