A Systematic Approach to Pregnancy-Specific Liver Disorders

Consultation for liver disease during pregnancy is challenging for both the hepatologist and gynecologist, as normal physiologic changes during pregnancy can mimic chronic liver disease. Pregnancy-specific liver disorders are leading causes of abnormal liver function tests during pregnancy. Moreover, up to 3% of all pregnant women in developed countries experience liver diseases nonspecific to pregnancy. When severe, pregnancy-specific liver disorders are associated with significant morbidity and mortality for both the mother and the fetus. The main factors that determine maternal prognosis are the type of liver disease; degree of impaired synthetic, metabolic, and excretory liver function; and timing of delivery. This article focuses on a systematic approach to diagnosing and managing pregnancy-specific liver disorders, which includes understanding normal findings in pregnancy, excluding liver diseases nonspecific to pregnancy, factoring in trimester status, and using clinical clues to make a diagnosis and provide treatment in a timely fashion.

Emerging risk factors for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease associated hepatocellular carcinoma

Worldwide, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has reached epidemic proportions and in parallel, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has become one of the fastest growing cancers. Epidemiological studies have not only shed light on the prevalence and incidence of the disease but have also unmasked important environmental risk factors, including the role of diabetes and dyslipidemia in disease pathogenesis. Genetic association studies have identified single nucleotide polymorphisms implicated in NAFLD-HCC, many of which are part of lipid metabolism pathways. Through these clinical studies and subsequently, translational and basic research, the role of statins as a chemoprotective agent has also emerged with ongoing clinical trials assessing their utility in HCC prevention and treatment. In this review, we summarize the recent epidemiological studies describing the burden of NAFLD-HCC in different patient populations and countries. We discuss the genetic and environmental risk factors for NAFLD-HCC and highlight the chemoprotective role of statins and aspirin. We also summarize what is known about NAFLD-HCC in the cirrhosis and non-cirrhosis populations and briefly address the role of surveillance in NAFLD-HCC patients.

Clinical Food Addiction Is Not Associated with Development of Metabolic Complications in Liver Transplant Recipients

Background and Aims: Given the increased risk of post-transplant metabolic syndrome (PTMS; defined by hypertension, diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia), we aimed to identify the potential role of food addiction in the development of metabolic complications in the post-liver transplant population. Methods: Inclusion criteria included adult liver transplant recipients followed at our institution between June 2016 and November 2016. Participants were administered a demographic survey as well as the Yale Food Assessment Scale 2.0, a 35-item questionnaire used to assess frequency of food addiction in accordance with the DSM-V guidelines of substance use disorders. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Results: Our study included 236 liver transplant recipients (139 males, 97 females). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) BMI of participants was 26.8 kg/m² (24.2, 30.4), and median (IQR) time since transplantation was 50.9 months (19.6, 119.8). The prevalence rates of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and diabetes mellitus were 54.7%, 25.0% and 27.1%, respectively. Twelve participants (5.1%) were found to have a diagnosis of food addiction. A diagnosis of food misuse was made in 94 (39.8%) of the transplant recipients. Conclusions: Our findings are consistent with prior data that indicate high prevalence of metabolic complications among liver transplant recipients. Food addiction was not predictive of metabolic complications within this population. Nevertheless, we found that this population was at high risk of demonstrating symptoms of food misuse, and they were not likely to appreciate the risks of pathologic patterns of eating. Given the increasing risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in this population, efforts should be made to identify risk factors for the development of PTMS.

Soft tissue high grade myoepithelial carcinoma with round cell morphology: report of a newly described entity with EWSR1 gene rearrangement

The case of soft tissue malignant myoepithelioma is presented including clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and cytogenetic findings. A 36-year-old Saudi male patient suffered from large mass involving right scapula and right shoulder joint measuring 14x13x11 mm. Core biopsy revealed sheets and lobules of poorly differentiated small malignant cells with marked atypia and frequent mitosis. Initially, immunohistochemistry was reactive for vimentin, pan-cytokeratin, EMA and CD99. The case was negative for desmin, SMA, CD34, S-100 protein and GFAP. FISH analysis exhibited negativity for SS18 (18q11.2) gene rearrangement and positivity for EWSR1 (22q12) gene rearrangement and a diagnosis of Ewing/PNET was considered. Clinical behavior and therapeutic response did not match the diagnosis with re-evaluation. Wedge biopsy demonstrated aggregates of epithelioid cells besides calponin and P63 positivity. Final diagnosis of malignant myoepithelioma with EWSR1 gene rearrangement was issued; a new entity with aggressive course. Myoepithelial carcinoma of soft tissue exhibits a wide spectrum of cytomorphology with overlapping phenotype similar to other soft tissue sarcoma like synovial sarcoma, mesenchymal chondrosarcoma, epithelioid sarcoma as well as Ewing/PNET. Moreover, a new finding of EWSR1 gene rearrangement is recognized in malignant myoepithelioma with different fusion partners. Hence, myoepithelial carcinoma should be kept in mind in diagnosis of soft tissue tumors even with unusual phenotype and gene rearrangement.