Factors increasing the mortality rate for patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

The objective of this report was to analyze the current surgical results of operative treatment in patients suffering ruptured AAA (abdominal aortic aneurysms) and to define those independent predictive factors for mortality. During a period of 2 years, from January 1996 to December 1997, 144 patients operated on for ruptured AAA in 10 hospitals were included in a multicenter retrospective study. Among the collected variables concerning each patient, those with potential relation to surgical mortality were studied: gender, age, diabetes, hypertension, cardiopathy, pulmonary obstructive disease, preoperative renal dysfunction, symptomatic cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, hematocrit on admission, preoperative hypotension < 80 mmHg, loss of consciousness, cardiac arrest, aortic aneurysm location (infrarenal versus non-infrarenal), iliac involvement, aneurysm size, type of rupture, left renal vein ligature, ligature of a patent inferior mesenteric artery, place of aortic cross-clamping, type of grafting, exclusion of both hypogastric arteries, venous technical complications, associated surgery, use of cell saver, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications (renal failure, sepsis, coagulopathy, cardiac complications, pulmonary complications, colon ischemia, prosthetic graft complications, and need for reoperation). Those variables with statistical significance in the univariate analysis were introduced into a multivariate logistic regression model to determine the independent predictors of death. From our results we concluded that surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms continues to have an excessively high mortality rate. Even though some preoperative variables could be identified as predictors of mortality, an absolute mortality risk has not yet been determined and the decision to negate surgery should be individualized rather than taken on that basis only. Early diagnosis and treatment of symptomatic aneurysms would improve mortality figures and selective screening should be contemplated.

[Indications for carotid endarterectomy without arteriography. A validation study using eco-Doppler]

INTRODUCTION

The possibility of diagnosing carotid stenosis and carrying out surgery without arteriography has increased with the use of different diagnostic methods. The eco-Doppler has been shown to be a useful method, although it requires previous individualised validation.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to validate our Vascular Diagnostic Laboratory in the diagnosis of stenosis of the carotid bifurcation using eco-Doppler as compared with angiography, and the therapeutic indication thus obtained.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We made a prospective study for one year of 62 consecutive patients diagnosed on eco-Doppler as having carotid stenosis of over 70% and subsequent carotid arteriography. The treatment indicated is given, without waiting for the result of the angiography, on clinical evaluation, computerized tomography or cranial magnetic resonance and eco-Doppler, and subsequently on angiography. The degree of correlation of both methods, both for the therapeutic indication and for the degree of stenosis was determined.

RESULTS

In five cases there was discrepancy and the therapeutic indication was different. Three of these were related to the diagnosis of carotid occlusion and in the other two cases there were bilateral lesions of over 50% on eco-Doppler, which were classified as minor on angiographic study. In the group with stenosis of over 70% with < 50% contralateral stenosis, eco-Doppler showed sensitivity and specificity of 100%, with a kappa correlation index = 1.

CONCLUSION

It is possible to indicate carotid endarterectomy in patients with unilateral stenosis greater than 70% and contralateral stenosis < 50%, based on the eco-Doppler studies done in our Vascular Diagnostic Laboratory.