1
|
Söreskog E, Borgström F, Shepstone L, Clarke S, Cooper C, Harvey I, Harvey NC, Howe A, Johansson H, Marshall T, O'Neill TW, Peters TJ, Redmond NM, Turner D, Holland R, McCloskey E, Kanis JA. Long-term cost-effectiveness of screening for fracture risk in a UK primary care setting: the SCOOP study. Osteoporos Int 2020; 31:1499-1506. [PMID: 32239237 PMCID: PMC7115896 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05372-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 02/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Community-based screening and treatment of women aged 70-85 years at high fracture risk reduced fractures; moreover, the screening programme was cost-saving. The results support a case for a screening programme of fracture risk in older women in the UK. INTRODUCTION The SCOOP (screening for prevention of fractures in older women) randomized controlled trial investigated whether community-based screening could reduce fractures in women aged 70-85 years. The objective of this study was to estimate the long-term cost-effectiveness of screening for fracture risk in a UK primary care setting compared with usual management, based on the SCOOP study. METHODS A health economic Markov model was used to predict the life-time consequences in terms of costs and quality of life of the screening programme compared with the control arm. The model was populated with costs related to drugs, administration and screening intervention derived from the SCOOP study. Fracture risk reduction in the screening arm compared with the usual management arm was derived from SCOOP. Modelled fracture risk corresponded to the risk observed in SCOOP. RESULTS Screening of 1000 patients saved 9 hip fractures and 20 non-hip fractures over the remaining lifetime (mean 14 years) compared with usual management. In total, the screening arm saved costs (£286) and gained 0.015 QALYs/patient in comparison with usual management arm. CONCLUSIONS This analysis suggests that a screening programme of fracture risk in older women in the UK would gain quality of life and life years, and reduce fracture costs to more than offset the cost of running the programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - F Borgström
- Quantify Research, Stockholm, Sweden
- LIME/MMC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L Shepstone
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - S Clarke
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospitals Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - C Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- Oxford Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - I Harvey
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - N C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - A Howe
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - H Johansson
- Centre for Metabolic Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK
- Centre for Bone and Arthritis Research (CBAR), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - T Marshall
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - T W O'Neill
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - T J Peters
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - N M Redmond
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West (NIHR CLAHRC West), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation, Bristol, UK
| | - D Turner
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - R Holland
- Leicester Medical School, Centre for Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - E McCloskey
- Centre for Metabolic Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK
- Centre for Integrated research into Musculoskeletal Ageing, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
- Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, The Mellanby Centre For Bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - J A Kanis
- Centre for Metabolic Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK.
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Condurache CI, Chiu S, Chotiyarnwong P, Johansson H, Shepstone L, Lenaghan E, Cooper C, Clarke S, Khioe RFS, Fordham R, Gittoes N, Harvey I, Harvey NC, Heawood A, Holland R, Howe A, Kanis JA, Marshall T, O'Neill TW, Peters TJ, Redmond NM, Torgerson D, Turner D, McCloskey E. Screening for high hip fracture risk does not impact on falls risk: a post hoc analysis from the SCOOP study. Osteoporos Int 2020; 31:457-464. [PMID: 31960099 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-019-05270-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED A reduction in hip fracture incidence following population screening might reflect the effectiveness of anti-osteoporosis therapy, behaviour change to reduce falls, or both. This post hoc analysis demonstrates that identifying high hip fracture risk by FRAX was not associated with any alteration in falls risk. INTRODUCTION To investigate whether effectiveness of an osteoporosis screening programme to reduce hip fractures was mediated by modification of falls risk in the screening arm. METHODS The SCOOP study recruited 12,483 women aged 70-85 years, individually randomised to a control (n = 6250) or screening (n = 6233) arm; in the latter, osteoporosis treatment was recommended to women at high risk of hip fracture, while the control arm received usual care. Falls were captured by self-reported questionnaire. We determined the influence of baseline risk factors on future falls, and then examined for differences in falls risk between the randomisation groups, particularly in those at high fracture risk. RESULTS Women sustaining one or more falls were slightly older at baseline than those remaining falls free during follow-up (mean difference 0.70 years, 95%CI 0.55-0.85, p < 0.001). A higher FRAX 10-year probability of hip fracture was associated with increased likelihood of falling, with fall risk increasing by 1-2% for every 1% increase in hip fracture probability. However, falls risk factors were well balanced between the study arms and, importantly, there was no evidence of a difference in falls occurrence. In particular, there was no evidence of interaction (p = 0.18) between baseline FRAX hip fracture probabilities and falls risk in the two arms, consistent with no impact of screening on falls in women informed to be at high risk of hip fracture. CONCLUSION Effectiveness of screening for high FRAX hip fracture probability to reduce hip fracture risk was not mediated by a reduction in falls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C I Condurache
- Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Aging, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, The Mellanby Centre For Bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - S Chiu
- Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Aging, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, The Mellanby Centre For Bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - P Chotiyarnwong
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, The Mellanby Centre For Bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - H Johansson
- Centre for Metabolic Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK
- Centre for Bone and Arthritis Research (CBAR), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - L Shepstone
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - E Lenaghan
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - C Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- Oxford Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - S Clarke
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospitals Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - R F S Khioe
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - R Fordham
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - N Gittoes
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - I Harvey
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - N C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - A Heawood
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - R Holland
- Leicester Medical School, Centre for Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - A Howe
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - J A Kanis
- Centre for Metabolic Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - T Marshall
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - T W O'Neill
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - T J Peters
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - N M Redmond
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West (NIHR CLAHRC West), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation, Bristol, UK
| | - D Torgerson
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - D Turner
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - E McCloskey
- Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Aging, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK.
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, The Mellanby Centre For Bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
- Centre for Metabolic Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Parsons CM, Harvey N, Shepstone L, Kanis JA, Lenaghan E, Clarke S, Fordham R, Gittoes N, Harvey I, Holland R, Redmond NM, Howe A, Marshall T, Peters TJ, Torgerson D, O'Neill TW, McCloskey E, Cooper C. Systematic screening using FRAX ® leads to increased use of, and adherence to, anti-osteoporosis medications: an analysis of the UK SCOOP trial. Osteoporos Int 2020; 31:67-75. [PMID: 31606826 PMCID: PMC6952271 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-019-05142-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED In the large community-based SCOOP trial, systematic fracture risk screening using FRAX® led to greater use of AOM and greater adherence, in women at high fracture risk, compared with usual care. INTRODUCTION In the SCreening of Older wOmen for Prevention of fracture (SCOOP) trial, we investigated the effect of the screening intervention on subsequent long-term self-reported adherence to anti-osteoporosis medications (AOM). METHODS SCOOP was a primary care-based UK multicentre trial of screening for fracture risk. A total of 12,483 women (70-85 years) were randomised to either usual NHS care, or assessment using the FRAX® tool ± dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), with medication recommended for those found to be at high risk of hip fracture. Self-reported AOM use was obtained by postal questionnaires at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months. Analysis was limited to those who initiated AOM during follow-up. Logistic regression was used to explore baseline determinants of adherence (good ≥ 80%; poor < 80%). RESULTS The mean (SD) age of participants was 75.6 (4.2) years, with 6233 randomised to screening and 6250 to the control group. Of those participants identified at high fracture risk in the screening group, 38.2% of those on treatment at 6 months were still treated at 60 months, whereas the corresponding figure for the control group was 21.6%. Older age was associated with poorer adherence (OR per year increase in age 0.96 [95% CI 0.93, 0.99], p = 0.01), whereas history of parental hip fracture was associated with greater rate adherence (OR 1.67 [95% CI 1.23, 2.26], p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Systematic fracture risk screening using FRAX® leads to greater use of AOM and greater adherence, in women at high fracture risk, compared with usual care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M Parsons
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - N Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - J A Kanis
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Institute for Health and Ageing, Catholic University of Australia, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - S Clarke
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - R Fordham
- University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - N Gittoes
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - I Harvey
- University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - R Holland
- University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - N M Redmond
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- NIHR CLAHRC West, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - A Howe
- University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | | | - T J Peters
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - T W O'Neill
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - E McCloskey
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Mellanby Centre for Bone Research, Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - C Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ridd MJ, Gaunt DM, Guy RH, Redmond NM, Garfield K, Hollinghurst S, Ball N, Shaw L, Purdy S, Metcalfe C. Comparison of patient (POEM), observer (EASI, SASSAD, TIS) and corneometry measures of emollient effectiveness in children with eczema: findings from the COMET feasibility trial. Br J Dermatol 2018; 179:362-370. [PMID: 29476542 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.16475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eczema affects around 20% of children, but multiple different outcome measures have hampered research into the effectiveness of different treatments. OBJECTIVES To compare the change in scores and correlations within and between five measures of eczema severity: Patient-Orientated Eczema Measure (POEM), Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Six Area, Six Sign Atopic Dermatitis (SASSAD), Three Item Severity (TIS) and skin hydration (corneometry). METHODS Data from a feasibility trial that randomized young children with eczema to one of four emollients were used. Participants were followed for 3 months (84 days). Descriptive statistics (by emollient over time) and Spearman's correlation coefficients comparing scores at each time point and absolute change (between adjacent time points) for each outcome measure were calculated. RESULTS In total, 197 children, mean ± SD age 21·7 ± 12·8 months, were randomized. POEM and TIS appeared to capture a range of eczema severity at baseline, but only POEM had close approximation to normal distribution. Mean POEM, EASI, SASSAD and TIS scores improved month by month, with POEM showing the greatest sensitivity (effect size 0·42). Correlations within POEM, EASI, SASSAD and TIS were moderate to good, decreasing over time. Correlations between measures were strongest for EASI, SASSAD and TIS. By contrast, corneometry scores were more variable, correlated less well over time and were poorly correlated with the other measures. CONCLUSIONS Except for corneometry, all measures appear to change in relation to emollient use over time and correlate well with themselves. POEM demonstrated the greatest range of scores at baseline and change in eczema severity over the first 28 days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Ridd
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, U.K
| | - D M Gaunt
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, U.K
| | - R H Guy
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, U.K
| | - N M Redmond
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, U.K.,NIHR CLAHRC West, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, 9th Floor, Whitefriars, Lewins Mead, Bristol, BS1 2NT, U.K
| | - K Garfield
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, U.K
| | - S Hollinghurst
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, U.K
| | - N Ball
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, U.K
| | - L Shaw
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Marlborough Street, Bristol, BS1 3NU, U.K
| | - S Purdy
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, U.K
| | - C Metcalfe
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, U.K
| |
Collapse
|