Food insecurity among adult females with a history of breast cancer compared to adult females without cancer in the USA

PURPOSE

To determine the prevalence of food insecurity (FI) among females with a history of breast cancer compared to females without cancer in the USA and the sociodemographic characteristics that may explain their FI.

METHODS

Using the 2019 National Health Interview (NHIS) survey that included the US Department of Agriculture's (USDA's) 10-item Household Food Security Survey Module, participants with high/moderate food security were considered food secure and low/very low food security were considered food insecure. Analyses accounted for complex survey design and included descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, and multivariate regression analyses.

RESULTS

Eligible females (40+ years old) included 557 with a history of breast cancer and 9678 without a cancer history. FI was experienced by an estimated 4.4% of females with breast cancer, compared to 9.3% of females without cancer. Controlling for age, race/ethnicity, education level, general health status, and body mass index, the prevalence ratio between the two study groups was 0.50 (95% CI 0.33-0.78).

CONCLUSIONS

In this national sample, the prevalence of FI among females with a history breast cancer was lower than females without a history of cancer.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

FI is low among breast cancer survivors, and routine FI screening among breast cancer survivors may not be warranted for all patients. Healthcare providers, however, should be aware of FI as a social determinant of health and consider it when there are known financial issues among cancer survivors.

The Effect of Two Interventions to Increase Breast Cancer Screening in Rural Women

Guideline-based mammography screening is essential to lowering breast cancer mortality, yet women residing in rural areas have lower rates of up to date (UTD) breast cancer screening compared to women in urban areas. We tested the comparative effectiveness of a tailored DVD, and the DVD plus patient navigation (PN) intervention vs. Usual Care (UC) for increasing the percentage of rural women (aged 50 to 74) UTD for breast cancer screening, as part of a larger study. Four hundred and two women who were not UTD for breast cancer screening, eligible, and between the ages of 50 to 74 were recruited from rural counties in Indiana and Ohio. Consented women were randomly assigned to one of three groups after baseline assessment of sociodemographic variables, health status, beliefs related to cancer screening tests, and history of receipt of guideline-based screening. The mean age of participants was 58.2 years with 97% reporting White race. After adjusting for covariates, 54% of women in the combined intervention (DVD + PN) had a mammogram within the 12-month window, over 5 times the rate of becoming UTD compared to UC (OR = 5.11; 95% CI = 2.57, 10.860; p < 0.001). Interactions of the intervention with other variables were not significant. Significant predictors of being UTD included: being in contemplation stage (intending to have a mammogram in the next 6 months), being UTD with other cancer screenings, having more disposable income and receiving a reminder for breast screening. Women who lived in areas with greater Area Deprivation Index scores (a measure of poverty) were less likely to become UTD with breast cancer screening. For rural women who were not UTD with mammography screening, the addition of PN to a tailored DVD significantly improved the uptake of mammography. Attention should be paid to certain groups of women most at risk for not receiving UTD breast screening to improve breast cancer outcomes in rural women.