1
|
Badker R, Miller K, Pardee C, Oppenheim B, Stephenson N, Ash B, Philippsen T, Ngoon C, Savage P, Lam C, Madhav N. Challenges in reported COVID-19 data: best practices and recommendations for future epidemics. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6:bmjgh-2021-005542. [PMID: 33958393 PMCID: PMC8103560 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The proliferation of composite data sources tracking the COVID-19 pandemic emphasises the need for such databases during large-scale infectious disease events as well as the potential pitfalls due to the challenges of combining disparate data sources. Multiple organisations have attempted to standardise the compilation of disparate data from multiple sources during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, each composite data source can use a different approach to compile data and address data issues with varying results. We discuss some best practices for researchers endeavouring to create such compilations while discussing three key categories of challenges: (1) data dissemination, which includes discrepant estimates and varying data structures due to multiple agencies and reporting sources generating public health statistics on the same event; (2) data elements, such as date formats and location names, lack standardisation, and differing spatial and temporal resolutions often create challenges when combining sources; and (3) epidemiological factors, including missing data, reporting lags, retrospective data corrections and changes to case definitions that cannot easily be addressed by the data compiler but must be kept in mind when reviewing the data. Efforts to reform the global health data ecosystem should bear such challenges in mind. Standards and best practices should be developed and incorporated to yield more robust, transparent and interoperable data. Since no standards exist yet, we have highlighted key challenges in creating a comprehensive spatiotemporal view of outbreaks from multiple, often discrepant, reporting sources and provided guidelines to address them. In general, we caution against an over-reliance on fully automated systems for integrating surveillance data and strongly advise that epidemiological experts remain engaged in the process of data assessment, integration, validation and interpretation to identify, diagnose and resolve data challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Tanya Philippsen
- Metabiota Inc, San Francisco, California, USA.,University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | - Cathine Lam
- Metabiota Inc, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Nita Madhav
- Metabiota Inc, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jamison DT, Alwan A, Mock CN, Nugent R, Watkins D, Adeyi O, Anand S, Atun R, Bertozzi S, Bhutta Z, Binagwaho A, Black R, Blecher M, Bloom BR, Brouwer E, Bundy DAP, Chisholm D, Cieza A, Cullen M, Danforth K, de Silva N, Debas HT, Donkor P, Dua T, Fleming KA, Gallivan M, Garcia PJ, Gawande A, Gaziano T, Gelband H, Glass R, Glassman A, Gray G, Habte D, Holmes KK, Horton S, Hutton G, Jha P, Knaul FM, Kobusingye O, Krakauer EL, Kruk ME, Lachmann P, Laxminarayan R, Levin C, Looi LM, Madhav N, Mahmoud A, Mbanya JC, Measham A, Medina-Mora ME, Medlin C, Mills A, Mills JA, Montoya J, Norheim O, Olson Z, Omokhodion F, Oppenheim B, Ord T, Patel V, Patton GC, Peabody J, Prabhakaran D, Qi J, Reynolds T, Ruacan S, Sankaranarayanan R, Sepúlveda J, Skolnik R, Smith KR, Temmerman M, Tollman S, Verguet S, Walker DG, Walker N, Wu Y, Zhao K. Universal health coverage and intersectoral action for health: key messages from Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition. Lancet 2018; 391:1108-1120. [PMID: 29179954 PMCID: PMC5996988 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32906-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2017] [Revised: 11/01/2017] [Accepted: 11/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The World Bank is publishing nine volumes of Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition (DCP3) between 2015 and 2018. Volume 9, Improving Health and Reducing Poverty, summarises the main messages from all the volumes and contains cross-cutting analyses. This Review draws on all nine volumes to convey conclusions. The analysis in DCP3 is built around 21 essential packages that were developed in the nine volumes. Each essential package addresses the concerns of a major professional community (eg, child health or surgery) and contains a mix of intersectoral policies and health-sector interventions. 71 intersectoral prevention policies were identified in total, 29 of which are priorities for early introduction. Interventions within the health sector were grouped onto five platforms (population based, community level, health centre, first-level hospital, and referral hospital). DCP3 defines a model concept of essential universal health coverage (EUHC) with 218 interventions that provides a starting point for country-specific analysis of priorities. Assuming steady-state implementation by 2030, EUHC in lower-middle-income countries would reduce premature deaths by an estimated 4·2 million per year. Estimated total costs prove substantial: about 9·1% of (current) gross national income (GNI) in low-income countries and 5·2% of GNI in lower-middle-income countries. Financing provision of continuing intervention against chronic conditions accounts for about half of estimated incremental costs. For lower-middle-income countries, the mortality reduction from implementing the EUHC can only reach about half the mortality reduction in non-communicable diseases called for by the Sustainable Development Goals. Full achievement will require increased investment or sustained intersectoral action, and actions by finance ministries to tax smoking and polluting emissions and to reduce or eliminate (often large) subsidies on fossil fuels appear of central importance. DCP3 is intended to be a model starting point for analyses at the country level, but country-specific cost structures, epidemiological needs, and national priorities will generally lead to definitions of EUHC that differ from country to country and from the model in this Review. DCP3 is particularly relevant as achievement of EUHC relies increasingly on greater domestic finance, with global developmental assistance in health focusing more on global public goods. In addition to assessing effects on mortality, DCP3 looked at outcomes of EUHC not encompassed by the disability-adjusted life-year metric and related cost-effectiveness analyses. The other objectives included financial protection (potentially better provided upstream by keeping people out of the hospital rather than downstream by paying their hospital bills for them), stillbirths averted, palliative care, contraception, and child physical and intellectual growth. The first 1000 days after conception are highly important for child development, but the next 7000 days are likewise important and often neglected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dean T Jamison
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Ala Alwan
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Rifat Atun
- Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Robert Black
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mark Blecher
- National Treasury of South Africa, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Barry R Bloom
- Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Dan Chisholm
- World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | - Haile T Debas
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Peter Donkor
- Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Tarun Dua
- World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Kenneth A Fleming
- Center for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA; University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Atul Gawande
- Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thomas Gaziano
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Roger Glass
- Fogarty International Center, US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Glenda Gray
- University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Demissie Habte
- International Clinical Epidemiology Network, New Delhi, India
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Carol Medlin
- Praxis Social Impact Consulting, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Anne Mills
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Zachary Olson
- University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Toby Ord
- University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - George C Patton
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - John Peabody
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Dorairaj Prabhakaran
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India
| | - Jinyuan Qi
- Princeton, University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jaime Sepúlveda
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Kirk R Smith
- University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Neff Walker
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Yangfeng Wu
- The George Institute for Global Health at Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
| | - Kun Zhao
- China National Health Development Research Center, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|