Comparison of mammography and ultrasound findings in the follow-up of patients with breast cancer treated with segmental mastectomy followed by intraoperative electron radiotherapy versus external whole breast radiotherapy

PURPOSE

This study aims to describe imaging findings in patients treated with intraoperative electron radiotherapy and compare them with those detected in patients treated with external whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT).

METHODS

The study population consisted of 25 patients who received intraoperative radiotherapy [IORT (21 Gy)] as single-dose radiotherapy and a control group of 25 patients who received WBRT at the same institution. Mammography and ultrasound (US) findings were divided into three groups: minor, intermediate, and advanced. On mammography, mass lesions were considered advanced, and asymmetries or architectural distortions were considered intermediate. Oil cysts, linear scars, and the increase in parenchymal density were considered minor findings. On US, irregular non-mass lesions were considered advanced, and circumscribed hypoechoic lesions or planar irregular scars with shadowing were considered intermediate. Oil cysts, fluid collections, or linear scars were considered minor findings.

RESULTS

On mammography, skin thickening (P = 0.001), edema (P < 0.001), increased parenchymal density (P < 0.001), dystrophic calcifications (P = 0.045), and scar/distortion (P = 0.005) were significantly more common in the WBRT group. On US, irregular non-mass lesions, which made interpretation considerably difficult, were significantly more common in the IORT group (P = 0.004). Dominant US findings were fluid collections and postoperative linear or planar scars in the WBRT group. Minor findings were more common in low-density breasts, and major findings (intermediate and advanced) were more common in high-density breasts on both mammographies (P = 0.011) and US (P = 0.027) in the IORT group.

CONCLUSION

Ill-defined non-mass lesions detected on US in the IORT group have not been defined previously. Radiologists should be aware of these lesions because they can be confusing, especially in early follow-up studies. This study has found that minor findings are seen more frequently in low-density breasts, while major findings are more common in high-density breasts in the IORT group. This has not been reported before, and further studies with more cases are needed to verify these results.

Optimizing the Personalized Care for the Management of Rectal Cancer: A Consensus Statement

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in Turkey. The current guidelines do not provide sufficient information to cover all aspects of the management of rectal cancer. Although treatment has been standardized in terms of the basic principles of neoadjuvant, surgical, and adjuvant therapy, uncertainties in the management of rectal cancer may lead to significant differences in clinical practice. In order to clarify these uncertainties, a consensus program was constructed with the participation of the physicians from the Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar and Koç Universities. This program included the physicians from the departments of general surgery, gastroenterology, pathology, radiology, nuclear medicine, medical oncology, radiation oncology, and medical genetics. The gray zones in the management of rectal cancer were determined by reviewing the evidence-based data and current guidelines before the meeting. Topics to be discussed consisted of diagnosis, staging, surgical treatment for the primary disease, use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment, management of recurrent disease, screening, follow-up, and genetic counseling. All those topics were discussed under supervision of a presenter and a chair with active participation of related physicians. The consensus text was structured by centralizing the decisions based on the existing data.

Were We Able to Reduce Cardiac Doses in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy Over Time?

Objective

In this study, we aimed to review the heart and left coronary artery doses over the years in patients who received breast cancer radiotherapy (RT).

Materials and Methods

A total of 436 breast cancer patients of 2 RT centers treated between the years 2010 and 2018 were included. The mean heart doses (HeartDmean-HDM) and left coronary artery mean doses (LDM) were analyzed using nonparametric tests. The conventional RT (CRT) was 50 Gy/2 Gy in 5 weeks, and the hypofractionated RT (HRT) was 40.05 Gy/2.67 Gy in 3 weeks. Boost was applied as 10-16 Gy/2 Gy for CRT and 10 Gy/2.5 Gy for HRT. An equivalent conventional total dose of 2 Gy/fraction (EQD2) was taken into account for HRT.

Results

HDM was 107±104 cGy, and LDM was 288±209 cGy for the entire group. HDM was significantly lower in patients with breast-conserving surgery (99±94 cGy) than that in those with mastectomy (128±124 cGy) (p<0.001). Field-in-field intensity-modulated RT technique significantly reduced the doses compared to volumetric applications (104±95 cGy vs 141±38 cGy; p = 0.002). HDM was significantly increased with lymphatic RT (132±58 cGy vs 112±115 cGy; p<0.001). The addition of internal mammary volumes significantly increased HDM (p<0.001). No significant effect of boost was observed (p = 0.96). For both CRT and HRT regimens, HDM values were significantly lower after the year 2014 (right side p<0.001, left side p = 0.01). In the left side CRT, HDM was 1.74 Gy before 2014 and 1.3 Gy after 2014 and 1.0 and 1.19 Gy, respectively, for the right side.

Conclusion

All efforts to reduce the cardiac doses will likely reduce long-term side effects.

Temporary Implant Irradiation: Survey of Turkish Society of Radiation Oncology Breast Cancer Study Group

Objective

To understand the clinical approach of radiation oncologists during the treatment of patients with breast reconstruction.

Materials and Methods

A questionnaire survey was emailed to 105 active members of the Turkish Radiation Oncology Society, the Breast Cancer Study Group. The factors associated with radiation oncologists and their current practice was identified.

Results

Fifty radiation oncologists (47.6%) responded, and most of the responders (83%) were physicians who treated >50 new breast cancer patients annually. The majority of the physicians worked in academic hospitals and had more than 15 years of work experience. The early reconstruction rate was noted to be low among patients with mastectomy (<10% of the mastectomy patients) (p<0.05). Early implant irradiation with temporary tissue expander was noted to be a more common procedure. The majority of the respondents (68%) preferred to irradiate an inflated implant (20% total, 80% partial). In addition, 22% of the physicians declared that they routinely used bolus and that 60% of them used it only for patients at a high risk of local recurrence factors.

Conclusion

It can thus be concluded that variations exist between experienced radiation oncologists and others. Hypofractionation is not yet commonly practiced for patients with reconstruction in Turkey. A concrete consensus can be helpful to create a homogeneity in treatment decisions and practical applications.

Expressed Gene Fusions as Frequent Drivers of Poor Outcomes in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer

We sought to uncover genetic drivers of hormone receptor-positive (HR⁺) breast cancer, using a targeted next-generation sequencing approach for detecting expressed gene rearrangements without prior knowledge of the fusion partners. We identified intergenic fusions involving driver genes, including PIK3CA, AKT3, RAF1, and ESR1, in 14% (24/173) of unselected patients with advanced HR⁺ breast cancer. FISH confirmed the corresponding chromosomal rearrangements in both primary and metastatic tumors. Expression of novel kinase fusions in nontransformed cells deregulates phosphoprotein signaling, cell proliferation, and survival in three-dimensional culture, whereas expression in HR⁺ breast cancer models modulates estrogen-dependent growth and confers hormonal therapy resistance in vitro and in vivo Strikingly, shorter overall survival was observed in patients with rearrangement-positive versus rearrangement-negative tumors. Correspondingly, fusions were uncommon (<5%) among 300 patients presenting with primary HR⁺ breast cancer. Collectively, our findings identify expressed gene fusions as frequent and potentially actionable drivers in HR⁺ breast cancer.Significance: By using a powerful clinical molecular diagnostic assay, we identified expressed intergenic fusions as frequent contributors to treatment resistance and poor survival in advanced HR⁺ breast cancer. The prevalence and biological and prognostic significance of these alterations suggests that their detection may alter clinical management and bring to light new therapeutic opportunities. Cancer Discov; 8(3); 336-53. ©2017 AACR.See related commentary by Natrajan et al., p. 272See related article by Liu et al., p. 354This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 253.

Male breast cancer: 37-year data study at a single experience center in Turkey

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of prognostic factors on the overall survival (OS) and locoregional control (LC) among male breast cancer (MBC) patients treated at Cerrahpasa Medical School Hospital, along with a review of the related literature.

METHODS

The data of 86 patients treated for MBC from 1973 to 2010 are retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics and clinical information, including the date of diagnosis, treatment, clinical course, and the date and causes of death are routinely recorded.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 66 months. Isolated local-regional recurrence and distant metastases were observed in 15 (17.4%) and 24 (34.1%) of the cases, respectively. The 5-year OS rate was 65.8%; the disease-free survival rate was 72.4%, and the LC rate was 89.7%. The prognostic factors influencing local relapse were the T stage (p=0.002) and the chest wall muscular invasion (p=0.027) in the univariate analysis. The prognostic factors influencing OS were the presence of a positive axillary lymph node (p=0.001) and the T stage (p=0.001) in the univariate analysis. The T stage (p=0.008) and node (N) stage (p=0.038) were significant prognostic factors for OS in the multivariate analyses. Also, the T stage (p=0.034) was found to be significant for LC.

CONCLUSION

We found that only the tumor size and lymph node status were independent prognostic factors for survival. In addition, only the tumor size was an independent prognostic factor for locoregional relapse. Modified radical mastectomy and conservative surgical procedures had similar outcomes for LC.

Male breast cancers behave differently in elderly patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate tumor characteristics, management and survival in elderly male breast cancer patients in comparison with younger men.

METHODS

We reviewed medical records of 99 male breast cancer patients between 1972 and 2011. The median age of the patients was 64.5 years. Patient characteristics including clinicopathologic factors, treatment modalities, survival and prognostic factors were evaluated. Patients were subdivided into two groups according to their age (young, <65 years; old, ≥ 65 years) and compared based on these factors.

RESULTS

Elderly male breast cancer patients had larger tumors in more advanced stages at the time of diagnosis compared with younger patients. In spite of the larger tumors at presentation, older patients had tumors with more favorable biological characteristics, such as higher ratio of estrogen and progesterone receptor expression. Ten-year cancer-specific survival for older patients was 49.2% compared with 55.8% in younger men (P = 0.8). Prognostic factors influencing overall survival in univariate analysis were: the presence of metastatic axillary lymph nodes (P = 0.0001), T stage (P = 0.001) and age ≥ 65 years. Multivariate analysis indicated T stage (P = 0.008) and N stage (P = 0.038) as the significant negative prognostic factors for overall survival. Although surgery, radiotherapy and hormone therapy were equally utilized in old and young patients, old patients were less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated the differences in the clinical and biological characteristics of male breast cancer according to the age of the patients.

The role of US and MR imaging in detecting local chest wall tumor recurrence after mastectomy

PURPOSE

To determine the role of clinical examination, ultrasonography (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting local tumor recurrence in patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 27 patients who were examined between April 1999 and April 2003. US evaluation of the chest wall was performed in all patients. MRI was performed on 10 patients due to suspicious findings in clinical examination, on 3 patients due to US findings, and on 8 patients due to both US and clinical examination findings. Six patients without any suspicious findings underwent MRI for follow-up purposes. The lesions detected with MRI were evaluated according to their morphology, contrast enhancement characteristics and dynamics. The focal lesions that enhanced intensely at the early phase were accepted as suspicious for malignancy.

RESULTS

Of the 10 cases that underwent biopsy secondary to suspicious lesions for malignancy according to MRI findings, 7 were found to have recurrence. In the remaining 3 patients, recurrence diagnosis was made based on the fact that the lesions regressed in response to chemotherapy. In 17 cases, there were no suspicious findings on MRI for local recurrence. In 2 of these cases, biopsies were performed due to suspicious US findings; however, no malignancies were detected. The sensitivity and specificity of clinical examination in detecting local recurrence was 70% and 35.2%, respectively. These values were 90% and 88.2% for US, and 100% and 100% for MRI.

CONCLUSION

In patients with mastectomy, US and MRI were more successful in detecting local recurrence than clinical examination. Considering the fact that US is cheaper and more readily available than MRI, it should be part of the routine follow-up in order to detect local recurrence early. MRI will be helpful in cases with suspicious US findings by increasing the specificity of the evaluation as well as determining the actual size and spread of any lesions, which is valuable information for the subsequent management and response to the particular treatment.

Ultrasonographic appearance of endometrium in postmenopausal breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen

OBJECTIVES

To assess the ultrasonographic appearance and associated pathological changes of the endometrium in postmenopausal breast cancer patients with tamoxifen therapy.

STUDY DESIGN

Forty-eight postmenopausal breast cancer patients receiving 20 mg/day tamoxifen for 6-84 months (mean 29) and 38 control breast cancer patients without any hormonal treatment were examined by transvaginal ultrasonography and endometrial biopsy. Any thickening of the endometrium with cystic formations or homogeneous endometrial thickening > 10 mm detected by ultrasonography was defined as abnormal endometrial appearance. Homogeneous endometrial thickening < 10 mm without cystic formations was accepted as normal. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

The two groups were similar in age and menopausal period. The patients on tamoxifen therapy had a thicker endometrium (8.6 +/- 6.6 mm) than the non-treated women (4.8 +/- 3.1 mm), which was found to be a statistically significant difference (P < 0.01). The sonographic evaluations showed abnormal endometrial appearance in 8 cases of tamoxifen treated women while the others revealed homogeneous thickness < 10 mm without cystic formations or a thin linear echo with or without fluid in the endometrial cavity. All 8 patients with cystic appearance had endometrial thickness > 10 mm. Only 1 patient had endometrial cancer on biopsy and no pathology was observed in the remaining 7 patients. In the control group, only 1 patient had abnormal ultrasonographic finding who had insufficient endometrial tissue on biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Tamoxifen can produce a sonographic image of the endometrium that resembles endometrial neoplasia. It is suggested that the discrepancy between the sonographic findings and histology may be the result of the stromal edema of the endometrium from tamoxifen treatment. Until more data are gathered, all postmenopausal breast cancer patients who are being treated with tamoxifen should have a periodic ultrasonographic examination and those presenting with a sonogram suggestive of endometrial pathology should undergo biopsy.