1
|
Mamounas EP, Bandos H, Rastogi P, Zhang Y, Treuner K, Lucas PC, Geyer CE, Fehrenbacher L, Chia SK, Brufsky AM, Walshe JM, Soori GS, Dakhil S, Paik S, Swain SM, Sgroi DC, Schnabel CA, Wolmark N. Breast Cancer Index and Prediction of Extended Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy Benefit in Hormone Receptor-positive Breast Cancer from the NRG Oncology/NSABP B-42 Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2024:734698. [PMID: 38376912 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-1977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE BCI (H/I) has been shown to predict extended endocrine therapy (EET) benefit. We examined BCI (H/I) for EET benefit prediction in NSABP B-42, which evaluated extended letrozole therapy (ELT) in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients after 5 years of ET. METHODS Stratified Cox model was used to analyze RFI as primary endpoint, with DR, BCFI, and DFS, as secondary endpoints. Due to a non-proportional effect of ELT on DR, time-dependent analyses were performed. RESULTS The translational cohort included 2,178 patients (45% BCI (H/I)-High, 55% BCI (H/I)-Low). ELT showed an absolute 10-year RFI benefit of 1.6% (P=0.10), resulting in an underpowered primary analysis (50% power). ELT benefit and BCI (H/I) did not show a significant interaction for RFI (BCI [(H/I])-Low: 10y absolute benefit 1.1% [HR=0.70, 0.43-1.12, P=0.13]; BCI [(H/I])-High: 2.4% [HR=0.83, 0.55-1.26, p=0.38]; Pinteraction=0.56). Time-dependent DR analysis showed that after 4y, BCI (H/I)-High patients had significant ELT benefit (HR=0.29, 0.12-0.69, P<0.01), whereas BCI (H/I)-Low patients were less likely to benefit (HR=0.68, 0.33-1.39, P=0.29) (Pinteraction=0.14). Prediction of ELT benefit by BCI (H/I) was more apparent in the HER2- subset after 4y (ELT-by-BCI (H/I) Pinteraction=0.04). CONCLUSIONS BCI(H/I)-High vs -Low did not show a statistically significant difference in ELT benefit for the primary endpoint (RFI). However, in time-dependent DR analysis, BCI (H/I)-High patients experienced statistically significant benefit from ELT after 4y, whereas (H/I)-Low patients did not. Because BCI (H/I) has been validated as a predictive marker of EET benefit in other trials, additional follow-up may enable further characterization of BCI's predictive ability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hanna Bandos
- NRG Oncology, and The University of Pittsburgh, United States
| | - Priya Rastogi
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), Pittsburgh, PA; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Yi Zhang
- Biotheranostics, a Hologic company, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Kai Treuner
- Biotheranostics, Inc, A Hologic Company, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Peter C Lucas
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Charles E Geyer
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | | | | | | | - Janice M Walshe
- Department of Medical Oncology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | | | | | - Soonmyung Paik
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Seoul, Korea (South), Republic of
| | - Sandra M Swain
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Dennis C Sgroi
- Harvard Medical School/ Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States
| | | | - Norman Wolmark
- NSABP Foundation, and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boyraz B, Sgroi DC, Iafrate AJ, Lerwill MF. Atypical cystic hypersecretory lesions of the breast commonly harbour TP53 alterations. Histopathology 2023; 83:989-993. [PMID: 37771083 DOI: 10.1111/his.15056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Cystic hypersecretory lesions are rare and include atypical cystic hypersecretory hyperplasia (A-CHH) and cystic hypersecretory carcinoma in situ (CHC-IS). Despite detailed morphological descriptions, little is known about the genetic landscape of these lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS We identified four A-CHH and three CHC-IS from 2010 to 2022. Patients ranged from 39 to 65 (median 49) years. All lesions showed characteristic cystically dilated ducts with colloid-like secretions lined by enlarged cells with hyperchromatic nuclei and at least moderate cytological atypia. CHC-IS was remarkable for a greater degree of intraductal proliferation, typically with a micropapillary pattern. Four patients had concurrent ipsilateral invasive carcinoma. Next-generation sequencing (104 cancer-associated genes) was successful in four, showing variants in TP53 (3), KEAP1 (1) and MDM2 (1). p53 immunohistochemistry was concordant with molecular results with mutant-pattern staining in three TP53-mutants and wild-type in one. In three cases where sequencing failed, one showed mutant p53 staining, one was wild-type and one had no remaining lesion. The combined molecular and immunohistochemical results demonstrated p53 alterations in one A-CHH and three CHC-IS. CONCLUSION Based on this limited cohort, atypical cystic hypersecretory lesions appear to commonly harbour TP53 alterations. To our knowledge, this is the first study to characterise molecular alterations in this rare subset of breast lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baris Boyraz
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dennis C Sgroi
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - A John Iafrate
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Melinda F Lerwill
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gerstung M, Jolly C, Leshchiner I, Dentro SC, Gonzalez S, Rosebrock D, Mitchell TJ, Rubanova Y, Anur P, Yu K, Tarabichi M, Deshwar A, Wintersinger J, Kleinheinz K, Vázquez-García I, Haase K, Jerman L, Sengupta S, Macintyre G, Malikic S, Donmez N, Livitz DG, Cmero M, Demeulemeester J, Schumacher S, Fan Y, Yao X, Lee J, Schlesner M, Boutros PC, Bowtell DD, Zhu H, Getz G, Imielinski M, Beroukhim R, Sahinalp SC, Ji Y, Peifer M, Markowetz F, Mustonen V, Yuan K, Wang W, Morris QD, Spellman PT, Wedge DC, Van Loo P, Tarabichi M, Wintersinger J, Deshwar AG, Yu K, Gonzalez S, Rubanova Y, Macintyre G, Adams DJ, Anur P, Beroukhim R, Boutros PC, Bowtell DD, Campbell PJ, Cao S, Christie EL, Cmero M, Cun Y, Dawson KJ, Demeulemeester J, Donmez N, Drews RM, Eils R, Fan Y, Fittall M, Garsed DW, Getz G, Ha G, Imielinski M, Jerman L, Ji Y, Kleinheinz K, Lee J, Lee-Six H, Livitz DG, Malikic S, Markowetz F, Martincorena I, Mitchell TJ, Mustonen V, Oesper L, Peifer M, Peto M, Raphael BJ, Rosebrock D, Sahinalp SC, Salcedo A, Schlesner M, Schumacher S, Sengupta S, Shi R, Shin SJ, Spiro O, Pitkänen E, Pivot X, Piñeiro-Yáñez E, Planko L, Plass C, Polak P, Pons T, Popescu I, Potapova O, Prasad A, Stein LD, Preston SR, Prinz M, Pritchard AL, Prokopec SD, Provenzano E, Puente XS, Puig S, Puiggròs M, Pulido-Tamayo S, Pupo GM, Vázquez-García I, Purdie CA, Quinn MC, Rabionet R, Rader JS, Radlwimmer B, Radovic P, Raeder B, Raine KM, Ramakrishna M, Ramakrishnan K, Vembu S, Ramalingam S, Raphael BJ, Rathmell WK, Rausch T, Reifenberger G, Reimand J, Reis-Filho J, Reuter V, Reyes-Salazar I, Reyna MA, Wheeler DA, Reynolds SM, Rheinbay E, Riazalhosseini Y, Richardson AL, Richter J, Ringel M, Ringnér M, Rino Y, Rippe K, Roach J, Yang TP, Roberts LR, Roberts ND, Roberts SA, Robertson AG, Robertson AJ, Rodriguez JB, Rodriguez-Martin B, Rodríguez-González FG, Roehrl MHA, Rohde M, Yao X, Rokutan H, Romieu G, Rooman I, Roques T, Rosebrock D, Rosenberg M, Rosenstiel PC, Rosenwald A, Rowe EW, Royo R, Yuan K, Rozen SG, Rubanova Y, Rubin MA, Rubio-Perez C, Rudneva VA, Rusev BC, Ruzzenente A, Rätsch G, Sabarinathan R, Sabelnykova VY, Zhu H, Sadeghi S, Sahinalp SC, Saini N, Saito-Adachi M, Saksena G, Salcedo A, Salgado R, Salichos L, Sallari R, Saller C, Wang W, Salvia R, Sam M, Samra JS, Sanchez-Vega F, Sander C, Sanders G, Sarin R, Sarrafi I, Sasaki-Oku A, Sauer T, Morris QD, Sauter G, Saw RPM, Scardoni M, Scarlett CJ, Scarpa A, Scelo G, Schadendorf D, Schein JE, Schilhabel MB, Schlesner M, Spellman PT, Schlomm T, Schmidt HK, Schramm SJ, Schreiber S, Schultz N, Schumacher SE, Schwarz RF, Scolyer RA, Scott D, Scully R, Wedge DC, Seethala R, Segre AV, Selander I, Semple CA, Senbabaoglu Y, Sengupta S, Sereni E, Serra S, Sgroi DC, Shackleton M, Van Loo P, Shah NC, Shahabi S, Shang CA, Shang P, Shapira O, Shelton T, Shen C, Shen H, Shepherd R, Shi R, Spellman PT, Shi Y, Shiah YJ, Shibata T, Shih J, Shimizu E, Shimizu K, Shin SJ, Shiraishi Y, Shmaya T, Shmulevich I, Wedge DC, Shorser SI, Short C, Shrestha R, Shringarpure SS, Shriver C, Shuai S, Sidiropoulos N, Siebert R, Sieuwerts AM, Sieverling L, Van Loo P, Signoretti S, Sikora KO, Simbolo M, Simon R, Simons JV, Simpson JT, Simpson PT, Singer S, Sinnott-Armstrong N, Sipahimalani P, Aaltonen LA, Skelly TJ, Smid M, Smith J, Smith-McCune K, Socci ND, Sofia HJ, Soloway MG, Song L, Sood AK, Sothi S, Abascal F, Sotiriou C, Soulette CM, Span PN, Spellman PT, Sperandio N, Spillane AJ, Spiro O, Spring J, Staaf J, Stadler PF, Abeshouse A, Staib P, Stark SG, Stebbings L, Stefánsson ÓA, Stegle O, Stein LD, Stenhouse A, Stewart C, Stilgenbauer S, Stobbe MD, Aburatani H, Stratton MR, Stretch JR, Struck AJ, Stuart JM, Stunnenberg HG, Su H, Su X, Sun RX, Sungalee S, Susak H, Adams DJ, Suzuki A, Sweep F, Szczepanowski M, Sültmann H, Yugawa T, Tam A, Tamborero D, Tan BKT, Tan D, Tan P, Agrawal N, Tanaka H, Taniguchi H, Tanskanen TJ, Tarabichi M, Tarnuzzer R, Tarpey P, Taschuk ML, Tatsuno K, Tavaré S, Taylor DF, Ahn KS, Taylor-Weiner A, Teague JW, Teh BT, Tembe V, Temes J, Thai K, Thayer SP, Thiessen N, Thomas G, Thomas S, Ahn SM, Thompson A, Thompson AM, Thompson JFF, Thompson RH, Thorne H, Thorne LB, Thorogood A, Tiao G, Tijanic N, Timms LE, Aikata H, Tirabosco R, Tojo M, Tommasi S, Toon CW, Toprak UH, Torrents D, Tortora G, Tost J, Totoki Y, Townend D, Akbani R, Traficante N, Treilleux I, Trotta JR, Trümper LHP, Tsao M, Tsunoda T, Tubio JMC, Tucker O, Turkington R, Turner DJ, Akdemir KC, Tutt A, Ueno M, Ueno NT, Umbricht C, Umer HM, Underwood TJ, Urban L, Urushidate T, Ushiku T, Uusküla-Reimand L, Al-Ahmadie H, Valencia A, Van Den Berg DJ, Van Laere S, Van Loo P, Van Meir EG, Van den Eynden GG, Van der Kwast T, Vasudev N, Vazquez M, Vedururu R, Al-Sedairy ST, Veluvolu U, Vembu S, Verbeke LPC, Vermeulen P, Verrill C, Viari A, Vicente D, Vicentini C, VijayRaghavan K, Viksna J, Al-Shahrour F, Vilain RE, Villasante I, Vincent-Salomon A, Visakorpi T, Voet D, Vyas P, Vázquez-García I, Waddell NM, Waddell N, Wadelius C, Alawi M, Wadi L, Wagener R, Wala JA, Wang J, Wang J, Wang L, Wang Q, Wang W, Wang Y, Wang Z, Albert M, Waring PM, Warnatz HJ, Warrell J, Warren AY, Waszak SM, Wedge DC, Weichenhan D, Weinberger P, Weinstein JN, Weischenfeldt J, Aldape K, Weisenberger DJ, Welch I, Wendl MC, Werner J, Whalley JP, Wheeler DA, Whitaker HC, Wigle D, Wilkerson MD, Williams A, Alexandrov LB, Wilmott JS, Wilson GW, Wilson JM, Wilson RK, Winterhoff B, Wintersinger JA, Wiznerowicz M, Wolf S, Wong BH, Wong T, Ally A, Wong W, Woo Y, Wood S, Wouters BG, Wright AJ, Wright DW, Wright MH, Wu CL, Wu DY, Wu G, Alsop K, Wu J, Wu K, Wu Y, Wu Z, Xi L, Xia T, Xiang Q, Xiao X, Xing R, Xiong H, Alvarez EG, Xu Q, Xu Y, Xue H, Yachida S, Yakneen S, Yamaguchi R, Yamaguchi TN, Yamamoto M, Yamamoto S, Yamaue H, Amary F, Yang F, Yang H, Yang JY, Yang L, Yang L, Yang S, Yang TP, Yang Y, Yao X, Yaspo ML, Amin SB, Yates L, Yau C, Ye C, Ye K, Yellapantula VD, Yoon CJ, Yoon SS, Yousif F, Yu J, Yu K, Aminou B, Yu W, Yu Y, Yuan K, Yuan Y, Yuen D, Yung CK, Zaikova O, Zamora J, Zapatka M, Zenklusen JC, Ammerpohl O, Zenz T, Zeps N, Zhang CZ, Zhang F, Zhang H, Zhang H, Zhang H, Zhang J, Zhang J, Zhang J, Anderson MJ, Zhang X, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Zhao Z, Zheng L, Zheng X, Zhou W, Zhou Y, Zhu B, Ang Y, Zhu H, Zhu J, Zhu S, Zou L, Zou X, deFazio A, van As N, van Deurzen CHM, van de Vijver MJ, van’t Veer L, Antonello D, von Mering C, Anur P, Aparicio S, Appelbaum EL, Arai Y, Aretz A, Arihiro K, Ariizumi SI, Armenia J, Arnould L, Asa S, Assenov Y, Atwal G, Aukema S, Auman JT, Aure MRR, Awadalla P, Aymerich M, Bader GD, Baez-Ortega A, Bailey MH, Bailey PJ, Balasundaram M, Balu S, Bandopadhayay P, Banks RE, Barbi S, Barbour AP, Barenboim J, Barnholtz-Sloan J, Barr H, Barrera E, Bartlett J, Bartolome J, Bassi C, Bathe OF, Baumhoer D, Bavi P, Baylin SB, Bazant W, Beardsmore D, Beck TA, Behjati S, Behren A, Niu B, Bell C, Beltran S, Benz C, Berchuck A, Bergmann AK, Bergstrom EN, Berman BP, Berney DM, Bernhart SH, Beroukhim R, Berrios M, Bersani S, Bertl J, Betancourt M, Bhandari V, Bhosle SG, Biankin AV, Bieg M, Bigner D, Binder H, Birney E, Birrer M, Biswas NK, Bjerkehagen B, Bodenheimer T, Boice L, Bonizzato G, De Bono JS, Boot A, Bootwalla MS, Borg A, Borkhardt A, Boroevich KA, Borozan I, Borst C, Bosenberg M, Bosio M, Boultwood J, Bourque G, Boutros PC, Bova GS, Bowen DT, Bowlby R, Bowtell DDL, Boyault S, Boyce R, Boyd J, Brazma A, Brennan P, Brewer DS, Brinkman AB, Bristow RG, Broaddus RR, Brock JE, Brock M, Broeks A, Brooks AN, Brooks D, Brors B, Brunak S, Bruxner TJC, Bruzos AL, Buchanan A, Buchhalter I, Buchholz C, Bullman S, Burke H, Burkhardt B, Burns KH, Busanovich J, Bustamante CD, Butler AP, Butte AJ, Byrne NJ, Børresen-Dale AL, Caesar-Johnson SJ, Cafferkey A, Cahill D, Calabrese C, Caldas C, Calvo F, Camacho N, Campbell PJ, Campo E, Cantù C, Cao S, Carey TE, Carlevaro-Fita J, Carlsen R, Cataldo I, Cazzola M, Cebon J, Cerfolio R, Chadwick DE, Chakravarty D, Chalmers D, Chan CWY, Chan K, Chan-Seng-Yue M, Chandan VS, Chang DK, Chanock SJ, Chantrill LA, Chateigner A, Chatterjee N, Chayama K, Chen HW, Chen J, Chen K, Chen Y, Chen Z, Cherniack AD, Chien J, Chiew YE, Chin SF, Cho J, Cho S, Choi JK, Choi W, Chomienne C, Chong Z, Choo SP, Chou A, Christ AN, Christie EL, Chuah E, Cibulskis C, Cibulskis K, Cingarlini S, Clapham P, Claviez A, Cleary S, Cloonan N, Cmero M, Collins CC, Connor AA, Cooke SL, Cooper CS, Cope L, Corbo V, Cordes MG, Cordner SM, Cortés-Ciriano I, Covington K, Cowin PA, Craft B, Craft D, Creighton CJ, Cun Y, Curley E, Cutcutache I, Czajka K, Czerniak B, Dagg RA, Danilova L, Davi MV, Davidson NR, Davies H, Davis IJ, Davis-Dusenbery BN, Dawson KJ, De La Vega FM, De Paoli-Iseppi R, Defreitas T, Tos APD, Delaneau O, Demchok JA, Demeulemeester J, Demidov GM, Demircioğlu D, Dennis NM, Denroche RE, Dentro SC, Desai N, Deshpande V, Deshwar AG, Desmedt C, Deu-Pons J, Dhalla N, Dhani NC, Dhingra P, Dhir R, DiBiase A, Diamanti K, Ding L, Ding S, Dinh HQ, Dirix L, Doddapaneni H, Donmez N, Dow MT, Drapkin R, Drechsel O, Drews RM, Serge S, Dudderidge T, Dueso-Barroso A, Dunford AJ, Dunn M, Dursi LJ, Duthie FR, Dutton-Regester K, Eagles J, Easton DF, Edmonds S, Edwards PA, Edwards SE, Eeles RA, Ehinger A, Eils J, Eils R, El-Naggar A, Eldridge M, Ellrott K, Erkek S, Escaramis G, Espiritu SMG, Estivill X, Etemadmoghadam D, Eyfjord JE, Faltas BM, Fan D, Fan Y, Faquin WC, Farcas C, Fassan M, Fatima A, Favero F, Fayzullaev N, Felau I, Fereday S, Ferguson ML, Ferretti V, Feuerbach L, Field MA, Fink JL, Finocchiaro G, Fisher C, Fittall MW, Fitzgerald A, Fitzgerald RC, Flanagan AM, Fleshner NE, Flicek P, Foekens JA, Fong KM, Fonseca NA, Foster CS, Fox NS, Fraser M, Frazer S, Frenkel-Morgenstern M, Friedman W, Frigola J, Fronick CC, Fujimoto A, Fujita M, Fukayama M, Fulton LA, Fulton RS, Furuta M, Futreal PA, Füllgrabe A, Gabriel SB, Gallinger S, Gambacorti-Passerini C, Gao J, Gao S, Garraway L, Garred Ø, Garrison E, Garsed DW, Gehlenborg N, Gelpi JLL, George J, Gerhard DS, Gerhauser C, Gershenwald JE, Gerstein M, Gerstung M, Getz G, Ghori M, Ghossein R, Giama NH, Gibbs RA, Gibson B, Gill AJ, Gill P, Giri DD, Glodzik D, Gnanapragasam VJ, Goebler ME, Goldman MJ, Gomez C, Gonzalez S, Gonzalez-Perez A, Gordenin DA, Gossage J, Gotoh K, Govindan R, Grabau D, Graham JS, Grant RC, Green AR, Green E, Greger L, Grehan N, Grimaldi S, Grimmond SM, Grossman RL, Grundhoff A, Gundem G, Guo Q, Gupta M, Gupta S, Gut IG, Gut M, Göke J, Ha G, Haake A, Haan D, Haas S, Haase K, Haber JE, Habermann N, Hach F, Haider S, Hama N, Hamdy FC, Hamilton A, Hamilton MP, Han L, Hanna GB, Hansmann M, Haradhvala NJ, Harismendy O, Harliwong I, Harmanci AO, Harrington E, Hasegawa T, Haussler D, Hawkins S, Hayami S, Hayashi S, Hayes DN, Hayes SJ, Hayward NK, Hazell S, He Y, Heath AP, Heath SC, Hedley D, Hegde AM, Heiman DI, Heinold MC, Heins Z, Heisler LE, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Helmy M, Heo SG, Hepperla AJ, Heredia-Genestar JM, Herrmann C, Hersey P, Hess JM, Hilmarsdottir H, Hinton J, Hirano S, Hiraoka N, Hoadley KA, Hobolth A, Hodzic E, Hoell JI, Hoffmann S, Hofmann O, Holbrook A, Holik AZ, Hollingsworth MA, Holmes O, Holt RA, Hong C, Hong EP, Hong JH, Hooijer GK, Hornshøj H, Hosoda F, Hou Y, Hovestadt V, Howat W, Hoyle AP, Hruban RH, Hu J, Hu T, Hua X, Huang KL, Huang M, Huang MN, Huang V, Huang Y, Huber W, Hudson TJ, Hummel M, Hung JA, Huntsman D, Hupp TR, Huse J, Huska MR, Hutter B, Hutter CM, Hübschmann D, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Imbusch CD, Imielinski M, Imoto S, Isaacs WB, Isaev K, Ishikawa S, Iskar M, Islam SMA, Ittmann M, Ivkovic S, Izarzugaza JMG, Jacquemier J, Jakrot V, Jamieson NB, Jang GH, Jang SJ, Jayaseelan JC, Jayasinghe R, Jefferys SR, Jegalian K, Jennings JL, Jeon SH, Jerman L, Ji Y, Jiao W, Johansson PA, Johns AL, Johns J, Johnson R, Johnson TA, Jolly C, Joly Y, Jonasson JG, Jones CD, Jones DR, Jones DTW, Jones N, Jones SJM, Jonkers J, Ju YS, Juhl H, Jung J, Juul M, Juul RI, Juul S, Jäger N, Kabbe R, Kahles A, Kahraman A, Kaiser VB, Kakavand H, Kalimuthu S, von Kalle C, Kang KJ, Karaszi K, Karlan B, Karlić R, Karsch D, Kasaian K, Kassahn KS, Katai H, Kato M, Katoh H, Kawakami Y, Kay JD, Kazakoff SH, Kazanov MD, Keays M, Kebebew E, Kefford RF, Kellis M, Kench JG, Kennedy CJ, Kerssemakers JNA, Khoo D, Khoo V, Khuntikeo N, Khurana E, Kilpinen H, Kim HK, Kim HL, Kim HY, Kim H, Kim J, Kim J, Kim JK, Kim Y, King TA, Klapper W, Kleinheinz K, Klimczak LJ, Knappskog S, Kneba M, Knoppers BM, Koh Y, Komorowski J, Komura D, Komura M, Kong G, Kool M, Korbel JO, Korchina V, Korshunov A, Koscher M, Koster R, Kote-Jarai Z, Koures A, Kovacevic M, Kremeyer B, Kretzmer H, Kreuz M, Krishnamurthy S, Kube D, Kumar K, Kumar P, Kumar S, Kumar Y, Kundra R, Kübler K, Küppers R, Lagergren J, Lai PH, Laird PW, Lakhani SR, Lalansingh CM, Lalonde E, Lamaze FC, Lambert A, Lander E, Landgraf P, Landoni L, Langerød A, Lanzós A, Larsimont D, Larsson E, Lathrop M, Lau LMS, Lawerenz C, Lawlor RT, Lawrence MS, Lazar AJ, Lazic AM, Le X, Lee D, Lee D, Lee EA, Lee HJ, Lee JJK, Lee JY, Lee J, Lee MTM, Lee-Six H, Lehmann KV, Lehrach H, Lenze D, Leonard CR, Leongamornlert DA, Leshchiner I, Letourneau L, Letunic I, Levine DA, Lewis L, Ley T, Li C, Li CH, Li HI, Li J, Li L, Li S, Li S, Li X, Li X, Li X, Li Y, Liang H, Liang SB, Lichter P, Lin P, Lin Z, Linehan WM, Lingjærde OC, Liu D, Liu EM, Liu FFF, Liu F, Liu J, Liu X, Livingstone J, Livitz D, Livni N, Lochovsky L, Loeffler M, Long GV, Lopez-Guillermo A, Lou S, Louis DN, Lovat LB, Lu Y, Lu YJ, Lu Y, Luchini C, Lungu I, Luo X, Luxton HJ, Lynch AG, Lype L, López C, López-Otín C, Ma EZ, Ma Y, MacGrogan G, MacRae S, Macintyre G, Madsen T, Maejima K, Mafficini A, Maglinte DT, Maitra A, Majumder PP, Malcovati L, Malikic S, Malleo G, Mann GJ, Mantovani-Löffler L, Marchal K, Marchegiani G, Mardis ER, Margolin AA, Marin MG, Markowetz F, Markowski J, Marks J, Marques-Bonet T, Marra MA, Marsden L, Martens JWM, Martin S, Martin-Subero JI, Martincorena I, Martinez-Fundichely A, Maruvka YE, Mashl RJ, Massie CE, Matthew TJ, Matthews L, Mayer E, Mayes S, Mayo M, Mbabaali F, McCune K, McDermott U, McGillivray PD, McLellan MD, McPherson JD, McPherson JR, McPherson TA, Meier SR, Meng A, Meng S, Menzies A, Merrett ND, Merson S, Meyerson M, Meyerson W, Mieczkowski PA, Mihaiescu GL, Mijalkovic S, Mikkelsen T, Milella M, Mileshkin L, Miller CA, Miller DK, Miller JK, Mills GB, Milovanovic A, Minner S, Miotto M, Arnau GM, Mirabello L, Mitchell C, Mitchell TJ, Miyano S, Miyoshi N, Mizuno S, Molnár-Gábor F, Moore MJ, Moore RA, Morganella S, Morris QD, Morrison C, Mose LE, Moser CD, Muiños F, Mularoni L, Mungall AJ, Mungall K, Musgrove EA, Mustonen V, Mutch D, Muyas F, Muzny DM, Muñoz A, Myers J, Myklebost O, Möller P, Nagae G, Nagrial AM, Nahal-Bose HK, Nakagama H, Nakagawa H, Nakamura H, Nakamura T, Nakano K, Nandi T, Nangalia J, Nastic M, Navarro A, Navarro FCP, Neal DE, Nettekoven G, Newell F, Newhouse SJ, Newton Y, Ng AWT, Ng A, Nicholson J, Nicol D, Nie Y, Nielsen GP, Nielsen MM, Nik-Zainal S, Noble MS, Nones K, Northcott PA, Notta F, O’Connor BD, O’Donnell P, O’Donovan M, O’Meara S, O’Neill BP, O’Neill JR, Ocana D, Ochoa A, Oesper L, Ogden C, Ohdan H, Ohi K, Ohno-Machado L, Oien KA, Ojesina AI, Ojima H, Okusaka T, Omberg L, Ong CK, Ossowski S, Ott G, Ouellette BFF, P’ng C, Paczkowska M, Paiella S, Pairojkul C, Pajic M, Pan-Hammarström Q, Papaemmanuil E, Papatheodorou I, Paramasivam N, Park JW, Park JW, Park K, Park K, Park PJ, Parker JS, Parsons SL, Pass H, Pasternack D, Pastore A, Patch AM, Pauporté I, Pea A, Pearson JV, Pedamallu CS, Pedersen JS, Pederzoli P, Peifer M, Pennell NA, Perou CM, Perry MD, Petersen GM, Peto M, Petrelli N, Petryszak R, Pfister SM, Phillips M, Pich O, Pickett HA, Pihl TD, Pillay N, Pinder S, Pinese M, Pinho AV. Author Correction: The evolutionary history of 2,658 cancers. Nature 2023; 614:E42. [PMID: 36697833 PMCID: PMC9931577 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05601-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz Gerstung
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Cambridge, UK. .,European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Genome Biology Unit, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Clemency Jolly
- grid.451388.30000 0004 1795 1830The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Ignaty Leshchiner
- grid.66859.340000 0004 0546 1623Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA
| | - Stefan C. Dentro
- grid.10306.340000 0004 0606 5382Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK ,grid.451388.30000 0004 1795 1830The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK ,grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Santiago Gonzalez
- grid.225360.00000 0000 9709 7726European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Cambridge, UK
| | - Daniel Rosebrock
- grid.66859.340000 0004 0546 1623Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA
| | - Thomas J. Mitchell
- grid.10306.340000 0004 0606 5382Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK ,grid.5335.00000000121885934University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Yulia Rubanova
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada ,grid.494618.6Vector Institute, Toronto, Ontario Canada
| | - Pavana Anur
- grid.5288.70000 0000 9758 5690Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR USA
| | - Kaixian Yu
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Maxime Tarabichi
- grid.10306.340000 0004 0606 5382Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK ,grid.451388.30000 0004 1795 1830The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Amit Deshwar
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada ,grid.494618.6Vector Institute, Toronto, Ontario Canada
| | - Jeff Wintersinger
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada ,grid.494618.6Vector Institute, Toronto, Ontario Canada
| | - Kortine Kleinheinz
- grid.7497.d0000 0004 0492 0584German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany ,grid.7700.00000 0001 2190 4373Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ignacio Vázquez-García
- grid.10306.340000 0004 0606 5382Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK ,grid.5335.00000000121885934University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kerstin Haase
- grid.451388.30000 0004 1795 1830The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Lara Jerman
- grid.225360.00000 0000 9709 7726European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Cambridge, UK ,grid.8954.00000 0001 0721 6013University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Subhajit Sengupta
- grid.240372.00000 0004 0400 4439NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL USA
| | - Geoff Macintyre
- grid.5335.00000000121885934Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Salem Malikic
- grid.61971.380000 0004 1936 7494Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia Canada ,grid.412541.70000 0001 0684 7796Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada
| | - Nilgun Donmez
- grid.61971.380000 0004 1936 7494Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia Canada ,grid.412541.70000 0001 0684 7796Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada
| | - Dimitri G. Livitz
- grid.66859.340000 0004 0546 1623Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA
| | - Marek Cmero
- grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria Australia ,grid.1042.70000 0004 0432 4889Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| | - Jonas Demeulemeester
- grid.451388.30000 0004 1795 1830The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK ,grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Schumacher
- grid.66859.340000 0004 0546 1623Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA
| | - Yu Fan
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Xiaotong Yao
- grid.5386.8000000041936877XWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY USA ,grid.429884.b0000 0004 1791 0895New York Genome Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Juhee Lee
- grid.205975.c0000 0001 0740 6917University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA USA
| | - Matthias Schlesner
- grid.7497.d0000 0004 0492 0584German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Paul C. Boutros
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada ,grid.419890.d0000 0004 0626 690XOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario Canada ,grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718University of California, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - David D. Bowtell
- grid.1055.10000000403978434Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| | - Hongtu Zhu
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Gad Getz
- grid.66859.340000 0004 0546 1623Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA ,grid.32224.350000 0004 0386 9924Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA USA ,grid.32224.350000 0004 0386 9924Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA ,grid.38142.3c000000041936754XHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Marcin Imielinski
- grid.5386.8000000041936877XWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY USA ,grid.429884.b0000 0004 1791 0895New York Genome Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Rameen Beroukhim
- grid.66859.340000 0004 0546 1623Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA ,grid.65499.370000 0001 2106 9910Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA
| | - S. Cenk Sahinalp
- grid.412541.70000 0001 0684 7796Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada ,grid.411377.70000 0001 0790 959XIndiana University, Bloomington, IN USA
| | - Yuan Ji
- grid.240372.00000 0004 0400 4439NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL USA ,grid.170205.10000 0004 1936 7822The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Martin Peifer
- grid.6190.e0000 0000 8580 3777University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Florian Markowetz
- grid.5335.00000000121885934Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ville Mustonen
- grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ke Yuan
- grid.5335.00000000121885934Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK ,grid.8756.c0000 0001 2193 314XUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Wenyi Wang
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Quaid D. Morris
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada ,grid.494618.6Vector Institute, Toronto, Ontario Canada
| | | | - Paul T. Spellman
- grid.5288.70000 0000 9758 5690Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR USA
| | - David C. Wedge
- grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK ,grid.454382.c0000 0004 7871 7212Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Peter Van Loo
- The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK. .,University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Calabrese C, Davidson NR, Demircioğlu D, Fonseca NA, He Y, Kahles A, Lehmann KV, Liu F, Shiraishi Y, Soulette CM, Urban L, Greger L, Li S, Liu D, Perry MD, Xiang Q, Zhang F, Zhang J, Bailey P, Erkek S, Hoadley KA, Hou Y, Huska MR, Kilpinen H, Korbel JO, Marin MG, Markowski J, Nandi T, Pan-Hammarström Q, Pedamallu CS, Siebert R, Stark SG, Su H, Tan P, Waszak SM, Yung C, Zhu S, Awadalla P, Creighton CJ, Meyerson M, Ouellette BFF, Wu K, Yang H, Brazma A, Brooks AN, Göke J, Rätsch G, Schwarz RF, Stegle O, Zhang Z, Wu K, Yang H, Fonseca NA, Kahles A, Lehmann KV, Urban L, Soulette CM, Shiraishi Y, Liu F, He Y, Demircioğlu D, Davidson NR, Calabrese C, Zhang J, Perry MD, Xiang Q, Greger L, Li S, Liu D, Stark SG, Zhang F, Amin SB, Bailey P, Chateigner A, Cortés-Ciriano I, Craft B, Erkek S, Frenkel-Morgenstern M, Goldman M, Hoadley KA, Hou Y, Huska MR, Khurana E, Kilpinen H, Korbel JO, Lamaze FC, Li C, Li X, Li X, Liu X, Marin MG, Markowski J, Nandi T, Nielsen MM, Ojesina AI, Pan-Hammarström Q, Park PJ, Pedamallu CS, Pedersen JS, Pederzoli P, Peifer M, Pennell NA, Perou CM, Perry MD, Petersen GM, Peto M, Petrelli N, Pedamallu CS, Petryszak R, Pfister SM, Phillips M, Pich O, Pickett HA, Pihl TD, Pillay N, Pinder S, Pinese M, Pinho AV, Pedersen JS, Pitkänen E, Pivot X, Piñeiro-Yáñez E, Planko L, Plass C, Polak P, Pons T, Popescu I, Potapova O, Prasad A, Siebert R, Preston SR, Prinz M, Pritchard AL, Prokopec SD, Provenzano E, Puente XS, Puig S, Puiggròs M, Pulido-Tamayo S, Pupo GM, Su H, Purdie CA, Quinn MC, Rabionet R, Rader JS, Radlwimmer B, Radovic P, Raeder B, Raine KM, Ramakrishna M, Ramakrishnan K, Tan P, Ramalingam S, Raphael BJ, Rathmell WK, Rausch T, Reifenberger G, Reimand J, Reis-Filho J, Reuter V, Reyes-Salazar I, Reyna MA, Teh BT, Reynolds SM, Rheinbay E, Riazalhosseini Y, Richardson AL, Richter J, Ringel M, Ringnér M, Rino Y, Rippe K, Roach J, Wang J, Roberts LR, Roberts ND, Roberts SA, Robertson AG, Robertson AJ, Rodriguez JB, Rodriguez-Martin B, Rodríguez-González FG, Roehrl MHA, Rohde M, Waszak SM, Rokutan H, Romieu G, Rooman I, Roques T, Rosebrock D, Rosenberg M, Rosenstiel PC, Rosenwald A, Rowe EW, Royo R, Xiong H, Rozen SG, Rubanova Y, Rubin MA, Rubio-Perez C, Rudneva VA, Rusev BC, Ruzzenente A, Rätsch G, Sabarinathan R, Sabelnykova VY, Yakneen S, Sadeghi S, Sahinalp SC, Saini N, Saito-Adachi M, Saksena G, Salcedo A, Salgado R, Salichos L, Sallari R, Saller C, Ye C, Salvia R, Sam M, Samra JS, Sanchez-Vega F, Sander C, Sanders G, Sarin R, Sarrafi I, Sasaki-Oku A, Sauer T, Yung C, Sauter G, Saw RPM, Scardoni M, Scarlett CJ, Scarpa A, Scelo G, Schadendorf D, Schein JE, Schilhabel MB, Schlesner M, Zhang X, Schlomm T, Schmidt HK, Schramm SJ, Schreiber S, Schultz N, Schumacher SE, Schwarz RF, Scolyer RA, Scott D, Scully R, Zheng L, Seethala R, Segre AV, Selander I, Semple CA, Senbabaoglu Y, Sengupta S, Sereni E, Serra S, Sgroi DC, Shackleton M, Zhu J, Shah NC, Shahabi S, Shang CA, Shang P, Shapira O, Shelton T, Shen C, Shen H, Shepherd R, Shi R, Zhu S, Shi Y, Shiah YJ, Shibata T, Shih J, Shimizu E, Shimizu K, Shin SJ, Shiraishi Y, Shmaya T, Shmulevich I, Awadalla P, Shorser SI, Short C, Shrestha R, Shringarpure SS, Shriver C, Shuai S, Sidiropoulos N, Siebert R, Sieuwerts AM, Sieverling L, Creighton CJ, Signoretti S, Sikora KO, Simbolo M, Simon R, Simons JV, Simpson JT, Simpson PT, Singer S, Sinnott-Armstrong N, Sipahimalani P, Meyerson M, Skelly TJ, Smid M, Smith J, Smith-McCune K, Socci ND, Sofia HJ, Soloway MG, Song L, Sood AK, Sothi S, Ouellette BFF, Sotiriou C, Soulette CM, Span PN, Spellman PT, Sperandio N, Spillane AJ, Spiro O, Spring J, Staaf J, Stadler PF, Wu K, Staib P, Stark SG, Stebbings L, Stefánsson ÓA, Stegle O, Stein LD, Stenhouse A, Stewart C, Stilgenbauer S, Stobbe MD, Yang H, Stratton MR, Stretch JR, Struck AJ, Stuart JM, Stunnenberg HG, Su H, Su X, Sun RX, Sungalee S, Susak H, Göke J, Suzuki A, Sweep F, Szczepanowski M, Sültmann H, Yugawa T, Tam A, Tamborero D, Tan BKT, Tan D, Tan P, Schwarz RF, Tanaka H, Taniguchi H, Tanskanen TJ, Tarabichi M, Tarnuzzer R, Tarpey P, Taschuk ML, Tatsuno K, Tavaré S, Taylor DF, Stegle O, Taylor-Weiner A, Teague JW, Teh BT, Tembe V, Temes J, Thai K, Thayer SP, Thiessen N, Thomas G, Thomas S, Zhang Z, Thompson A, Thompson AM, Thompson JFF, Thompson RH, Thorne H, Thorne LB, Thorogood A, Tiao G, Tijanic N, Timms LE, Brazma A, Tirabosco R, Tojo M, Tommasi S, Toon CW, Toprak UH, Torrents D, Tortora G, Tost J, Totoki Y, Townend D, Rätsch G, Traficante N, Treilleux I, Trotta JR, Trümper LHP, Tsao M, Tsunoda T, Tubio JMC, Tucker O, Turkington R, Turner DJ, Brooks AN, Tutt A, Ueno M, Ueno NT, Umbricht C, Umer HM, Underwood TJ, Urban L, Urushidate T, Ushiku T, Uusküla-Reimand L, Brazma A, Valencia A, Van Den Berg DJ, Van Laere S, Van Loo P, Van Meir EG, Van den Eynden GG, Van der Kwast T, Vasudev N, Vazquez M, Vedururu R, Brooks AN, Veluvolu U, Vembu S, Verbeke LPC, Vermeulen P, Verrill C, Viari A, Vicente D, Vicentini C, VijayRaghavan K, Viksna J, Göke J, Vilain RE, Villasante I, Vincent-Salomon A, Visakorpi T, Voet D, Vyas P, Vázquez-García I, Waddell NM, Waddell N, Wadelius C, Rätsch G, Wadi L, Wagener R, Wala JA, Wang J, Wang J, Wang L, Wang Q, Wang W, Wang Y, Wang Z, Schwarz RF, Waring PM, Warnatz HJ, Warrell J, Warren AY, Waszak SM, Wedge DC, Weichenhan D, Weinberger P, Weinstein JN, Weischenfeldt J, Stegle O, Weisenberger DJ, Welch I, Wendl MC, Werner J, Whalley JP, Wheeler DA, Whitaker HC, Wigle D, Wilkerson MD, Williams A, Zhang Z, Wilmott JS, Wilson GW, Wilson JM, Wilson RK, Winterhoff B, Wintersinger JA, Wiznerowicz M, Wolf S, Wong BH, Wong T, Aaltonen LA, Wong W, Woo Y, Wood S, Wouters BG, Wright AJ, Wright DW, Wright MH, Wu CL, Wu DY, Wu G, Abascal F, Wu J, Wu K, Wu Y, Wu Z, Xi L, Xia T, Xiang Q, Xiao X, Xing R, Xiong H, Abeshouse A, Xu Q, Xu Y, Xue H, Yachida S, Yakneen S, Yamaguchi R, Yamaguchi TN, Yamamoto M, Yamamoto S, Yamaue H, Aburatani H, Yang F, Yang H, Yang JY, Yang L, Yang L, Yang S, Yang TP, Yang Y, Yao X, Yaspo ML, Adams DJ, Yates L, Yau C, Ye C, Ye K, Yellapantula VD, Yoon CJ, Yoon SS, Yousif F, Yu J, Yu K, Agrawal N, Yu W, Yu Y, Yuan K, Yuan Y, Yuen D, Yung CK, Zaikova O, Zamora J, Zapatka M, Zenklusen JC, Ahn KS, Zenz T, Zeps N, Zhang CZ, Zhang F, Zhang H, Zhang H, Zhang H, Zhang J, Zhang J, Zhang J, Ahn SM, Zhang X, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Zhao Z, Zheng L, Zheng X, Zhou W, Zhou Y, Zhu B, Aikata H, Zhu H, Zhu J, Zhu S, Zou L, Zou X, deFazio A, van As N, van Deurzen CHM, van de Vijver MJ, van’t Veer L, Akbani R, von Mering C, Akdemir KC, Al-Ahmadie H, Al-Sedairy ST, Al-Shahrour F, Alawi M, Albert M, Aldape K, Alexandrov LB, Ally A, Alsop K, Alvarez EG, Amary F, Amin SB, Aminou B, Ammerpohl O, Anderson MJ, Ang Y, Antonello D, Anur P, Aparicio S, Appelbaum EL, Arai Y, Aretz A, Arihiro K, Ariizumi SI, Armenia J, Arnould L, Asa S, Assenov Y, Atwal G, Aukema S, Auman JT, Aure MRR, Awadalla P, Aymerich M, Bader GD, Baez-Ortega A, Bailey MH, Bailey PJ, Balasundaram M, Balu S, Bandopadhayay P, Banks RE, Barbi S, Barbour AP, Barenboim J, Barnholtz-Sloan J, Barr H, Barrera E, Bartlett J, Bartolome J, Bassi C, Bathe OF, Baumhoer D, Bavi P, Baylin SB, Bazant W, Beardsmore D, Beck TA, Behjati S, Behren A, Niu B, Bell C, Beltran S, Benz C, Berchuck A, Bergmann AK, Bergstrom EN, Berman BP, Berney DM, Bernhart SH, Beroukhim R, Berrios M, Bersani S, Bertl J, Betancourt M, Bhandari V, Bhosle SG, Biankin AV, Bieg M, Bigner D, Binder H, Birney E, Birrer M, Biswas NK, Bjerkehagen B, Bodenheimer T, Boice L, Bonizzato G, De Bono JS, Boot A, Bootwalla MS, Borg A, Borkhardt A, Boroevich KA, Borozan I, Borst C, Bosenberg M, Bosio M, Boultwood J, Bourque G, Boutros PC, Bova GS, Bowen DT, Bowlby R, Bowtell DDL, Boyault S, Boyce R, Boyd J, Brazma A, Brennan P, Brewer DS, Brinkman AB, Bristow RG, Broaddus RR, Brock JE, Brock M, Broeks A, Brooks AN, Brooks D, Brors B, Brunak S, Bruxner TJC, Bruzos AL, Buchanan A, Buchhalter I, Buchholz C, Bullman S, Burke H, Burkhardt B, Burns KH, Busanovich J, Bustamante CD, Butler AP, Butte AJ, Byrne NJ, Børresen-Dale AL, Caesar-Johnson SJ, Cafferkey A, Cahill D, Calabrese C, Caldas C, Calvo F, Camacho N, Campbell PJ, Campo E, Cantù C, Cao S, Carey TE, Carlevaro-Fita J, Carlsen R, Cataldo I, Cazzola M, Cebon J, Cerfolio R, Chadwick DE, Chakravarty D, Chalmers D, Chan CWY, Chan K, Chan-Seng-Yue M, Chandan VS, Chang DK, Chanock SJ, Chantrill LA, Chateigner A, Chatterjee N, Chayama K, Chen HW, Chen J, Chen K, Chen Y, Chen Z, Cherniack AD, Chien J, Chiew YE, Chin SF, Cho J, Cho S, Choi JK, Choi W, Chomienne C, Chong Z, Choo SP, Chou A, Christ AN, Christie EL, Chuah E, Cibulskis C, Cibulskis K, Cingarlini S, Clapham P, Claviez A, Cleary S, Cloonan N, Cmero M, Collins CC, Connor AA, Cooke SL, Cooper CS, Cope L, Corbo V, Cordes MG, Cordner SM, Cortés-Ciriano I, Covington K, Cowin PA, Craft B, Craft D, Creighton CJ, Cun Y, Curley E, Cutcutache I, Czajka K, Czerniak B, Dagg RA, Danilova L, Davi MV, Davidson NR, Davies H, Davis IJ, Davis-Dusenbery BN, Dawson KJ, De La Vega FM, De Paoli-Iseppi R, Defreitas T, Tos APD, Delaneau O, Demchok JA, Demeulemeester J, Demidov GM, Demircioğlu D, Dennis NM, Denroche RE, Dentro SC, Desai N, Deshpande V, Deshwar AG, Desmedt C, Deu-Pons J, Dhalla N, Dhani NC, Dhingra P, Dhir R, DiBiase A, Diamanti K, Ding L, Ding S, Dinh HQ, Dirix L, Doddapaneni H, Donmez N, Dow MT, Drapkin R, Drechsel O, Drews RM, Serge S, Dudderidge T, Dueso-Barroso A, Dunford AJ, Dunn M, Dursi LJ, Duthie FR, Dutton-Regester K, Eagles J, Easton DF, Edmonds S, Edwards PA, Edwards SE, Eeles RA, Ehinger A, Eils J, Eils R, El-Naggar A, Eldridge M, Ellrott K, Erkek S, Escaramis G, Espiritu SMG, Estivill X, Etemadmoghadam D, Eyfjord JE, Faltas BM, Fan D, Fan Y, Faquin WC, Farcas C, Fassan M, Fatima A, Favero F, Fayzullaev N, Felau I, Fereday S, Ferguson ML, Ferretti V, Feuerbach L, Field MA, Fink JL, Finocchiaro G, Fisher C, Fittall MW, Fitzgerald A, Fitzgerald RC, Flanagan AM, Fleshner NE, Flicek P, Foekens JA, Fong KM, Fonseca NA, Foster CS, Fox NS, Fraser M, Frazer S, Frenkel-Morgenstern M, Friedman W, Frigola J, Fronick CC, Fujimoto A, Fujita M, Fukayama M, Fulton LA, Fulton RS, Furuta M, Futreal PA, Füllgrabe A, Gabriel SB, Gallinger S, Gambacorti-Passerini C, Gao J, Gao S, Garraway L, Garred Ø, Garrison E, Garsed DW, Gehlenborg N, Gelpi JLL, George J, Gerhard DS, Gerhauser C, Gershenwald JE, Gerstein M, Gerstung M, Getz G, Ghori M, Ghossein R, Giama NH, Gibbs RA, Gibson B, Gill AJ, Gill P, Giri DD, Glodzik D, Gnanapragasam VJ, Goebler ME, Goldman MJ, Gomez C, Gonzalez S, Gonzalez-Perez A, Gordenin DA, Gossage J, Gotoh K, Govindan R, Grabau D, Graham JS, Grant RC, Green AR, Green E, Greger L, Grehan N, Grimaldi S, Grimmond SM, Grossman RL, Grundhoff A, Gundem G, Guo Q, Gupta M, Gupta S, Gut IG, Gut M, Göke J, Ha G, Haake A, Haan D, Haas S, Haase K, Haber JE, Habermann N, Hach F, Haider S, Hama N, Hamdy FC, Hamilton A, Hamilton MP, Han L, Hanna GB, Hansmann M, Haradhvala NJ, Harismendy O, Harliwong I, Harmanci AO, Harrington E, Hasegawa T, Haussler D, Hawkins S, Hayami S, Hayashi S, Hayes DN, Hayes SJ, Hayward NK, Hazell S, He Y, Heath AP, Heath SC, Hedley D, Hegde AM, Heiman DI, Heinold MC, Heins Z, Heisler LE, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Helmy M, Heo SG, Hepperla AJ, Heredia-Genestar JM, Herrmann C, Hersey P, Hess JM, Hilmarsdottir H, Hinton J, Hirano S, Hiraoka N, Hoadley KA, Hobolth A, Hodzic E, Hoell JI, Hoffmann S, Hofmann O, Holbrook A, Holik AZ, Hollingsworth MA, Holmes O, Holt RA, Hong C, Hong EP, Hong JH, Hooijer GK, Hornshøj H, Hosoda F, Hou Y, Hovestadt V, Howat W, Hoyle AP, Hruban RH, Hu J, Hu T, Hua X, Huang KL, Huang M, Huang MN, Huang V, Huang Y, Huber W, Hudson TJ, Hummel M, Hung JA, Huntsman D, Hupp TR, Huse J, Huska MR, Hutter B, Hutter CM, Hübschmann D, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Imbusch CD, Imielinski M, Imoto S, Isaacs WB, Isaev K, Ishikawa S, Iskar M, Islam SMA, Ittmann M, Ivkovic S, Izarzugaza JMG, Jacquemier J, Jakrot V, Jamieson NB, Jang GH, Jang SJ, Jayaseelan JC, Jayasinghe R, Jefferys SR, Jegalian K, Jennings JL, Jeon SH, Jerman L, Ji Y, Jiao W, Johansson PA, Johns AL, Johns J, Johnson R, Johnson TA, Jolly C, Joly Y, Jonasson JG, Jones CD, Jones DR, Jones DTW, Jones N, Jones SJM, Jonkers J, Ju YS, Juhl H, Jung J, Juul M, Juul RI, Juul S, Jäger N, Kabbe R, Kahles A, Kahraman A, Kaiser VB, Kakavand H, Kalimuthu S, von Kalle C, Kang KJ, Karaszi K, Karlan B, Karlić R, Karsch D, Kasaian K, Kassahn KS, Katai H, Kato M, Katoh H, Kawakami Y, Kay JD, Kazakoff SH, Kazanov MD, Keays M, Kebebew E, Kefford RF, Kellis M, Kench JG, Kennedy CJ, Kerssemakers JNA, Khoo D, Khoo V, Khuntikeo N, Khurana E, Kilpinen H, Kim HK, Kim HL, Kim HY, Kim H, Kim J, Kim J, Kim JK, Kim Y, King TA, Klapper W, Kleinheinz K, Klimczak LJ, Knappskog S, Kneba M, Knoppers BM, Koh Y, Komorowski J, Komura D, Komura M, Kong G, Kool M, Korbel JO, Korchina V, Korshunov A, Koscher M, Koster R, Kote-Jarai Z, Koures A, Kovacevic M, Kremeyer B, Kretzmer H, Kreuz M, Krishnamurthy S, Kube D, Kumar K, Kumar P, Kumar S, Kumar Y, Kundra R, Kübler K, Küppers R, Lagergren J, Lai PH, Laird PW, Lakhani SR, Lalansingh CM, Lalonde E, Lamaze FC, Lambert A, Lander E, Landgraf P, Landoni L, Langerød A, Lanzós A, Larsimont D, Larsson E, Lathrop M, Lau LMS, Lawerenz C, Lawlor RT, Lawrence MS, Lazar AJ, Lazic AM, Le X, Lee D, Lee D, Lee EA, Lee HJ, Lee JJK, Lee JY, Lee J, Lee MTM, Lee-Six H, Lehmann KV, Lehrach H, Lenze D, Leonard CR, Leongamornlert DA, Leshchiner I, Letourneau L, Letunic I, Levine DA, Lewis L, Ley T, Li C, Li CH, Li HI, Li J, Li L, Li S, Li S, Li X, Li X, Li X, Li Y, Liang H, Liang SB, Lichter P, Lin P, Lin Z, Linehan WM, Lingjærde OC, Liu D, Liu EM, Liu FFF, Liu F, Liu J, Liu X, Livingstone J, Livitz D, Livni N, Lochovsky L, Loeffler M, Long GV, Lopez-Guillermo A, Lou S, Louis DN, Lovat LB, Lu Y, Lu YJ, Lu Y, Luchini C, Lungu I, Luo X, Luxton HJ, Lynch AG, Lype L, López C, López-Otín C, Ma EZ, Ma Y, MacGrogan G, MacRae S, Macintyre G, Madsen T, Maejima K, Mafficini A, Maglinte DT, Maitra A, Majumder PP, Malcovati L, Malikic S, Malleo G, Mann GJ, Mantovani-Löffler L, Marchal K, Marchegiani G, Mardis ER, Margolin AA, Marin MG, Markowetz F, Markowski J, Marks J, Marques-Bonet T, Marra MA, Marsden L, Martens JWM, Martin S, Martin-Subero JI, Martincorena I, Martinez-Fundichely A, Maruvka YE, Mashl RJ, Massie CE, Matthew TJ, Matthews L, Mayer E, Mayes S, Mayo M, Mbabaali F, McCune K, McDermott U, McGillivray PD, McLellan MD, McPherson JD, McPherson JR, McPherson TA, Meier SR, Meng A, Meng S, Menzies A, Merrett ND, Merson S, Meyerson M, Meyerson W, Mieczkowski PA, Mihaiescu GL, Mijalkovic S, Mikkelsen T, Milella M, Mileshkin L, Miller CA, Miller DK, Miller JK, Mills GB, Milovanovic A, Minner S, Miotto M, Arnau GM, Mirabello L, Mitchell C, Mitchell TJ, Miyano S, Miyoshi N, Mizuno S, Molnár-Gábor F, Moore MJ, Moore RA, Morganella S, Morris QD, Morrison C, Mose LE, Moser CD, Muiños F, Mularoni L, Mungall AJ, Mungall K, Musgrove EA, Mustonen V, Mutch D, Muyas F, Muzny DM, Muñoz A, Myers J, Myklebost O, Möller P, Nagae G, Nagrial AM, Nahal-Bose HK, Nakagama H, Nakagawa H, Nakamura H, Nakamura T, Nakano K, Nandi T, Nangalia J, Nastic M, Navarro A, Navarro FCP, Neal DE, Nettekoven G, Newell F, Newhouse SJ, Newton Y, Ng AWT, Ng A, Nicholson J, Nicol D, Nie Y, Nielsen GP, Nielsen MM, Nik-Zainal S, Noble MS, Nones K, Northcott PA, Notta F, O’Connor BD, O’Donnell P, O’Donovan M, O’Meara S, O’Neill BP, O’Neill JR, Ocana D, Ochoa A, Oesper L, Ogden C, Ohdan H, Ohi K, Ohno-Machado L, Oien KA, Ojesina AI, Ojima H, Okusaka T, Omberg L, Ong CK, Ossowski S, Ott G, Ouellette BFF, P’ng C, Paczkowska M, Paiella S, Pairojkul C, Pajic M, Pan-Hammarström Q, Papaemmanuil E, Papatheodorou I, Paramasivam N, Park JW, Park JW, Park K, Park K, Park PJ, Parker JS, Parsons SL, Pass H, Pasternack D, Pastore A, Patch AM, Pauporté I, Pea A, Pearson JV. Author Correction: Genomic basis for RNA alterations in cancer. Nature 2023; 614:E37. [PMID: 36697831 PMCID: PMC9931574 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05596-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Claudia Calabrese
- grid.225360.00000 0000 9709 7726European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Natalie R. Davidson
- grid.5801.c0000 0001 2156 2780ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland ,grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA ,grid.5386.8000000041936877XWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY USA ,grid.419765.80000 0001 2223 3006SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland ,grid.412004.30000 0004 0478 9977University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Deniz Demircioğlu
- grid.4280.e0000 0001 2180 6431National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore ,grid.418377.e0000 0004 0620 715XGenome Institute of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nuno A. Fonseca
- grid.225360.00000 0000 9709 7726European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Yao He
- grid.11135.370000 0001 2256 9319Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - André Kahles
- grid.5801.c0000 0001 2156 2780ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland ,grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA ,grid.419765.80000 0001 2223 3006SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland ,grid.412004.30000 0004 0478 9977University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Kjong-Van Lehmann
- grid.5801.c0000 0001 2156 2780ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland ,grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA ,grid.419765.80000 0001 2223 3006SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland ,grid.412004.30000 0004 0478 9977University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Fenglin Liu
- grid.11135.370000 0001 2256 9319Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuichi Shiraishi
- grid.26999.3d0000 0001 2151 536XThe University of Tokyo, Minato-ku, Japan
| | - Cameron M. Soulette
- grid.205975.c0000 0001 0740 6917University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA USA
| | - Lara Urban
- grid.225360.00000 0000 9709 7726European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Liliana Greger
- grid.225360.00000 0000 9709 7726European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Siliang Li
- grid.21155.320000 0001 2034 1839BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China ,grid.507779.b0000 0004 4910 5858China National GeneBank-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
| | - Dongbing Liu
- grid.21155.320000 0001 2034 1839BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China ,grid.507779.b0000 0004 4910 5858China National GeneBank-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
| | - Marc D. Perry
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ,grid.266102.10000 0001 2297 6811University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Qian Xiang
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fan Zhang
- grid.11135.370000 0001 2256 9319Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Junjun Zhang
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Bailey
- grid.8756.c0000 0001 2193 314XUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Serap Erkek
- grid.4709.a0000 0004 0495 846XEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Genome Biology Unit, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katherine A. Hoadley
- grid.10698.360000000122483208The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | - Yong Hou
- grid.21155.320000 0001 2034 1839BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China ,grid.507779.b0000 0004 4910 5858China National GeneBank-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
| | - Matthew R. Huska
- grid.419491.00000 0001 1014 0849Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Max Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Helena Kilpinen
- grid.83440.3b0000000121901201University College London, London, UK
| | - Jan O. Korbel
- grid.4709.a0000 0004 0495 846XEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Genome Biology Unit, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximillian G. Marin
- grid.205975.c0000 0001 0740 6917University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA USA
| | - Julia Markowski
- grid.419491.00000 0001 1014 0849Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Max Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tannistha Nandi
- grid.418377.e0000 0004 0620 715XGenome Institute of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Qiang Pan-Hammarström
- grid.21155.320000 0001 2034 1839BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China ,grid.4714.60000 0004 1937 0626Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Chandra Sekhar Pedamallu
- grid.66859.340000 0004 0546 1623Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA USA ,grid.65499.370000 0001 2106 9910Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA ,grid.38142.3c000000041936754XHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Reiner Siebert
- grid.410712.10000 0004 0473 882XUlm University and Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany
| | - Stefan G. Stark
- grid.5801.c0000 0001 2156 2780ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland ,grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA ,grid.419765.80000 0001 2223 3006SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland ,grid.412004.30000 0004 0478 9977University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hong Su
- grid.21155.320000 0001 2034 1839BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China ,grid.507779.b0000 0004 4910 5858China National GeneBank-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
| | - Patrick Tan
- grid.418377.e0000 0004 0620 715XGenome Institute of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore ,grid.428397.30000 0004 0385 0924Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sebastian M. Waszak
- grid.4709.a0000 0004 0495 846XEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Genome Biology Unit, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christina Yung
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shida Zhu
- grid.21155.320000 0001 2034 1839BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China ,grid.507779.b0000 0004 4910 5858China National GeneBank-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
| | - Philip Awadalla
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ,grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada
| | - Chad J. Creighton
- grid.39382.330000 0001 2160 926XBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA
| | - Matthew Meyerson
- grid.66859.340000 0004 0546 1623Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA USA ,grid.65499.370000 0001 2106 9910Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA ,grid.38142.3c000000041936754XHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | | | - Kui Wu
- grid.21155.320000 0001 2034 1839BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China ,grid.507779.b0000 0004 4910 5858China National GeneBank-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
| | - Huanming Yang
- grid.21155.320000 0001 2034 1839BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
| | | | - Alvis Brazma
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, UK.
| | - Angela N. Brooks
- grid.205975.c0000 0001 0740 6917University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA USA ,grid.66859.340000 0004 0546 1623Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA USA ,grid.65499.370000 0001 2106 9910Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA
| | - Jonathan Göke
- grid.418377.e0000 0004 0620 715XGenome Institute of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore ,grid.410724.40000 0004 0620 9745National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Gunnar Rätsch
- ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. .,Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. .,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. .,SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland. .,University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Roland F. Schwarz
- grid.225360.00000 0000 9709 7726European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, UK ,grid.419491.00000 0001 1014 0849Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Max Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany ,grid.7497.d0000 0004 0492 0584German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, Germany ,grid.7497.d0000 0004 0492 0584German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Stegle
- grid.225360.00000 0000 9709 7726European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, UK ,grid.4709.a0000 0004 0495 846XEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Genome Biology Unit, Heidelberg, Germany ,grid.7497.d0000 0004 0492 0584German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Zemin Zhang
- grid.11135.370000 0001 2256 9319Peking University, Beijing, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sgroi DC, Treuner K, Zhang Y, Piper T, Salunga R, Ahmed I, Doos L, Thornber S, Taylor KJ, Brachtel E, Pirrie S, Schnabel CA, Rea D, Bartlett JMS. Correlative studies of the Breast Cancer Index (HOXB13/IL17BR) and ER, PR, AR, AR/ER ratio and Ki67 for prediction of extended endocrine therapy benefit: a Trans-aTTom study. Breast Cancer Res 2022; 24:90. [PMID: 36527133 PMCID: PMC9758861 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-022-01589-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple clinical trials demonstrate consistent but modest benefit of adjuvant extended endocrine therapy (EET) in HR + breast cancer patients. Predictive biomarkers to identify patients that benefit from EET are critical to balance modest reductions in risk against potential side effects of EET. This study compares the performance of the Breast Cancer Index, BCI (HOXB13/IL17BR, H/I), with expression of estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR), and androgen receptors (AR), and Ki67, for prediction of EET benefit. METHODS Node-positive (N+) patients from the Trans-aTTom study with available tissue specimen and BCI results (N = 789) were included. Expression of ER, PR, AR, and Ki67 was assessed by quantitative immunohistochemistry. BCI (H/I) gene expression analysis was conducted by quantitative RT-PCR. Statistical significance of the treatment by biomarker interaction was evaluated by likelihood ratio tests based on multivariate Cox proportional models, adjusting for age, tumor size, grade, and HER2 status. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate correlations between BCI (H/I) versus ER, PR, AR, Ki67 and AR/ER ratio. RESULTS EET benefit, measured by the difference in risk of recurrence between patients treated with tamoxifen for 10 versus 5 years, is significantly associated with increasing values of BCI (H/I) (interaction P = 0.01). In contrast, expression of ER (P = 0.83), PR (P = 0.66), AR (P = 0.78), Ki67 (P = 0.87) and AR/ER ratio (P = 0.84) exhibited no significant relationship with EET benefit. BCI (H/I) showed a very weak negative correlation with ER (r = - 0.18), PR (r = - 0.25), and AR (r = - 0.14) expression, but no correlation with either Ki67 (r = 0.04) or AR/ER ratio (r = 0.02). CONCLUSION These findings are consistent with the growing body of evidence that BCI (H/I) is significantly predictive of response to EET and outcome. Results from this direct comparison demonstrate that expression of ER, PR, AR, Ki67 or AR/ER ratio are not predictive of benefit from EET. BCI (H/I) is the only clinically validated biomarker that predicts EET benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis C Sgroi
- Molecular Pathology Research Unit, Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital East, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
- Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Cancer Research, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Kai Treuner
- Biotheranostics, A Hologic Company, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Yi Zhang
- Biotheranostics, A Hologic Company, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Ikhlaaq Ahmed
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lucy Doos
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sarah Thornber
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Elena Brachtel
- Molecular Pathology Research Unit, Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital East, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA
- Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Cancer Research, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah Pirrie
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Daniel Rea
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - John M S Bartlett
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bartlett JM, Sgroi DC, Treuner K, Zhang Y, Piper T, Salunga RC, Ahmed I, Doos L, Thornber S, Taylor KJ, Brachtel EF, Pirrie SJ, Schnabel CA, Rea DW. Breast Cancer Index Is a Predictive Biomarker of Treatment Benefit and Outcome from Extended Tamoxifen Therapy: Final Analysis of the Trans-aTTom Study. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:1871-1880. [PMID: 35144966 PMCID: PMC9306281 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-3385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Breast Cancer Index (BCI) HOXB13/IL17BR (H/I) ratio predicts benefit from extended endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early-stage breast cancer. Here, we report the final analysis of the Trans-aTTom study examining BCI (H/I)'s predictive performance. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN BCI results were available for 2,445 aTTom trial patients. The primary endpoint of recurrence-free interval (RFI) and secondary endpoints of disease-free interval (DFI) and disease-free survival (DFS) were examined using Cox proportional hazards regression and log-rank test. RESULTS Final analysis of the overall study population (N = 2,445) did not show a significant improvement in RFI with extended tamoxifen [HR, 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.69-1.16; P = 0.401]. Both the overall study population and N0 group were underpowered due to the low event rate in the N0 group. In a pre-planned analysis of the N+ subset (N = 789), BCI (H/I)-High patients derived significant benefit from extended tamoxifen (9.7% absolute benefit: HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.14-0.75; P = 0.016), whereas BCI (H/I)-Low patients did not (-1.2% absolute benefit; HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.76-1.64; P = 0.581). A significant treatment-to-biomarker interaction was demonstrated on the basis of RFI, DFI, and DFS (P = 0.037, 0.040, and 0.025, respectively). BCI (H/I)-High patients remained predictive of benefit from extended tamoxifen in the N+/HER2- subgroup (9.4% absolute benefit: HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.81; P = 0.047). A three-way interaction evaluating BCI (H/I), treatment, and HER2 status was not statistically significant (P = 0.849). CONCLUSIONS Novel findings demonstrate that BCI (H/I) significantly predicts benefit from extended tamoxifen in HR+ N+ patients with HER2- disease. Moreover, BCI (H/I) demonstrates significant treatment to biomarker interaction across survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M.S. Bartlett
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Ontario Institute of Cancer Research, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Kai Treuner
- Biotheranostics, Inc., San Diego, California
| | - Yi Zhang
- Biotheranostics, Inc., San Diego, California
| | - Tammy Piper
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | - Ikhlaaq Ahmed
- University of Birmingham, Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Lucy Doos
- University of Birmingham, Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Thornber
- University of Birmingham, Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Sarah J. Pirrie
- University of Birmingham, Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Daniel W. Rea
- University of Birmingham, Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nunes R, Sella T, Treuner K, Atkinson JM, Wong J, Zhang Y, Exman P, Dabbs D, Richardson AL, Schnabel CA, Sgroi DC, Oesterreich S, Cimino-Mathews A, Metzger O. Prognostic Utility of Breast Cancer Index to Stratify Distant Recurrence Risk in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:5688-5696. [PMID: 34376532 PMCID: PMC9401569 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-0733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The prognostic utility of Breast Cancer Index (BCI) for risk assessment of overall (0-10 years), early (0-5 years), and late (5-10 years) distant recurrence (DR) in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) was evaluated. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN BCI gene expression analysis was performed blinded to clinical outcome utilizing tumor specimens from patients with HR+ ILC from a multi-institutional cohort. The primary endpoint was time to DR. Kaplan-Meier analyses of overall, early, and late DR risk were performed, and statistical significance was evaluated by log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression. The prognostic contribution of BCI in addition to clinicopathologic factors was evaluated by likelihood ratio analysis. RESULTS Analysis of 307 patients (99% ER+, 53% T1, 42% N+, 70% grade II) showed significant differences in DR over 10 years based on BCI risk categories. BCI low- and intermediate-risk patients demonstrated similar DR rates of 7.6% and 8.0%, respectively, compared with 27.0% for BCI high-risk patients. BCI was a significant independent prognostic factor for overall 10-year DR [HR = 4.09; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.00-8.34; P = 0.0001] as well as for both early (HR = 8.19; 95% CI, 1.85-36.30; P = 0.0042) and late (HR = 3.04; 95% CI, 1.32-7.00; P = 0.0224) DR. In multivariate analysis, BCI remained the only statistically significant prognostic factor for DR (HR = 3.49; 95% CI, 1.28-9.54; P = 0.0150). CONCLUSIONS BCI is an independent prognostic factor for ILC and significantly stratified patients for cumulative risk of 10-year, early, and late DR. BCI added prognostic value beyond clinicopathologic characteristics in this distinct subtype of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquel Nunes
- Johns Hopkins University, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Tal Sella
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kai Treuner
- Biotheranostics, Inc., San Diego, California
| | - Jennifer M. Atkinson
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jenna Wong
- Biotheranostics, Inc., San Diego, California
| | - Yi Zhang
- Biotheranostics, Inc., San Diego, California
| | - Pedro Exman
- Hospital Alemao Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - David Dabbs
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Andrea L. Richardson
- Johns Hopkins University, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | - Steffi Oesterreich
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ashley Cimino-Mathews
- Johns Hopkins University, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Otto Metzger
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Corresponding Author: Otto Metzger, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Li K, Li T, Feng Z, Huang M, Wei L, Yan Z, Long M, Hu Q, Wang J, Liu S, Sgroi DC, Demehri S. CD8 + T cell immunity blocks the metastasis of carcinogen-exposed breast cancer. Sci Adv 2021; 7:7/25/eabd8936. [PMID: 34144976 PMCID: PMC8213232 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abd8936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
The link between carcinogen exposure and cancer immunogenicity is unclear. Single exposure to 12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA) at puberty accelerated spontaneous breast carcinogenesis in mouse mammary tumor virus-polyoma middle tumor-antigen transgenic (MMTV-PyMTtg or PyMT) and MMTV-Her2/neutg (Her2) mice. Paradoxically, DMBA-treated PyMT and Her2 animals were protected from metastasis. CD8+ T cells significantly infiltrated DMBA-exposed breast cancers. CD8+ T cell depletion resulted in severe lung and liver metastasis in DMBA-treated PyMT mice. Besides increasing tumor mutational burden, DMBA exposure up-regulated Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 21 (CCL21) in cancer cells and heightened antigen presentation. CCL21 injection suppressed breast cancer growth, and CCL21 receptor deletion attenuated T cell immunity against cancer metastasis in DMBA-treated PyMT animals. CCL21 expression correlated with increased mutational burden and cytolytic activity across human cancers. Higher CCL21 levels correlated with increased CD8+ T cell infiltrates in human breast cancer and predicted lower breast cancer distant recurrence rate. Collectively, carcinogen exposure induces immune-activating factors within cancer cells that promote CD8+ T cell immunity against metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaiwen Li
- Center for Cancer Immunology and Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Department of Dermatology and Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
| | - Tiancheng Li
- Center for Cancer Immunology and Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Department of Dermatology and Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Zhaoyi Feng
- Center for Cancer Immunology and Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Department of Dermatology and Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Mei Huang
- Center for Cancer Immunology and Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Department of Dermatology and Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Lei Wei
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - Zhiyu Yan
- Center for Cancer Immunology and Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Department of Dermatology and Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Mark Long
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - Qiang Hu
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - Jianmin Wang
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - Song Liu
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - Dennis C Sgroi
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Department of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Shadmehr Demehri
- Center for Cancer Immunology and Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Department of Dermatology and Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sgroi DC, Treuner K, Zhang Y, Piper T, Salunga R, Ahmed I, Doos L, Thornber S, Taylor KJ, Brachtel EF, Pirrie S, Schnabel CA, Rea DW, Bartlett JMS. Abstract GS4-09: Correlative studies of the breast cancer index (HOXB13/IL17BR) and ER, PR, AR, AR/ER ratio and Ki67 for prediction of extended endocrine benefit: A trans-aTTom study. Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs20-gs4-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Several biomarkers such as estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), androgen receptor (AR) and Ki67 have been implicated in the pathogenesis and/or as prognostic biomarkers of breast cancer, and are utilized to determine treatment. Given the heterogeneity of response to endocrine therapy, however, predictive biomarkers are critical to better individualize patient care. Previous results from the Trans-aTTom study demonstrated that the Breast Cancer Index HOXB13/IL17BR [BCI (H/I)] biomarker significantly predicts extended endocrine benefit from 10 vs 5y of tamoxifen. In this correlative study, the predictive activity of BCI (H/I) was compared with ER, PR, AR and Ki67 protein expression in node positive patients treated in the aTTom trial. Methods: Patients with available tumor tissue and biomarker analyses were included. ER, PR, AR and Ki67 were centrally assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) utilizing tissue microarrays. BCI gene expression analysis by RT-PCR was performed blinded to clinical outcome. Multivariate Cox models adjusting for age, tumor size, tumor grade and HER2 status were used to assess the significance of the interaction between treatment and each biomarker as continuous variables. 17-year risk of recurrence, as a function of each continuous biomarker, was estimated from Cox models in each of the 2 treatment arms. Results: Analysis of 789 HR+, N+ patients showed a weak negative correlation between BCI (H/I) and ER, PR, and AR expression whereas Ki67 and the AR/ER ratio showed no correlation (ER, cor=−0.18; PR, cor=−0.25; AR, cor=−0.14; Ki67, cor=0.04; AR/ER ratio, cor=0.02). The interaction between BCI (H/I) and extended tamoxifen treatment was significant (p=0.014). In addition, analysis of risk of recurrence as a function of continuous BCI (H/I) demonstrated that the magnitude in the reduction in recurrence risk with extended tamoxifen correlated with increasing H/I levels. In contrast, interaction P values were nonsignificant (ER, p=0.829; PR, p=0.659; AR, p=0.783; Ki67, p=0.865; AR/ER ratio, p=0.835) and the magnitude of endocrine benefit did not correlate with expression levels of any of other biomarkers.
Conclusion: Results from this post-hoc analysis of the Trans-aTTom study demonstrated that whereas BCI(H/I) is a significant predictive biomarker of endocrine response, analysis of ER, PR, AR, Ki67 and AR/ER expression showed no interaction with treatment, and lacked the ability to predict benefit of extended tamoxifen in HR+ early stage breast cancer. These results add to the growing body of evidence that BCI (H/I) is distinct in its ability to predict benefit from therapy and interrogates distinct tumor biology that is not captured by other traditional biomarkers.
Citation Format: Dennis C Sgroi, Kai Treuner, Yi Zhang, Tammy Piper, Ranelle Salunga, Ikhlaaq Ahmed, Lucy Doos, Sarah Thornber, Karen J Taylor, Elena F Brachtel, Sarah Pirrie, Catherine A Schnabel, Daniel W Rea, John MS Bartlett. Correlative studies of the breast cancer index (HOXB13/IL17BR) and ER, PR, AR, AR/ER ratio and Ki67 for prediction of extended endocrine benefit: A trans-aTTom study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-09.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Yi Zhang
- 2Biotheranostics, Inc., San Diego, CA
| | - Tammy Piper
- 3University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | - Ikhlaaq Ahmed
- 4University of Birmingham, Cancer Research UK Clinical Trails Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Lucy Doos
- 4University of Birmingham, Cancer Research UK Clinical Trails Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Thornber
- 4University of Birmingham, Cancer Research UK Clinical Trails Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Sarah Pirrie
- 4University of Birmingham, Cancer Research UK Clinical Trails Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Daniel W Rea
- 4University of Birmingham, Cancer Research UK Clinical Trails Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bartlett J, Sgroi DC, Treuner K, Zhang Y, Piper T, Salunga RC, Ahmed I, Doos L, Thornber S, Taylor KJ, Brachtel EF, Pirrie S, Schnabel CA, Rea DW. HER2 status and prediction of extended endocrine benefit with breast cancer index (BCI) in HR+ patients in the adjuvant tamoxifen: To offer more? (aTTom) trial. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
522 Background: BCI is a validated gene expression-based assay that stratifies patients based on risk of overall (0-10y) and late (post-5y) distant recurrence (DR) and predicts likelihood of benefit from extended endocrine therapy (EET). The Trans-aTTom study established Level1B validation for BCI (H/I) to predict benefit from EET.1 In this updated Trans-aTTom analysis including HER2 status, BCI (H/I) and prediction of endocrine benefit were further characterized. Methods: Centralized HER2 was determined for all cases according to current ASCO/CAP guidelines. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression were conducted to assess primary and secondary endpoints of Recurrence-Free Interval (RFI) and Disease-Free Interval (DFI), respectively. A three-way interaction using likelihood ratio testing, which included treatment, BCI (H/I) and HER2, was performed to assess the effect of HER2 on BCI (H/I) prediction of EET benefit. Results: Of 789 N+ patients, 90% (N = 711) and 9% (N = 72) were HR+/HER2- and HR+/HER2+, respectively. In the HER2- subset, BCI (H/I)-High (48%) showed significant benefit from 10y vs. 5y of tamoxifen (9.4% RFI: HR = 0.35 [95% CI 0.15-0.81]; P = 0.047) while BCI (H/I)-Low patients did not (-2.1% RFI; HR = 1.15 [95% CI 0.78-1.69]; P = 0.491). For DFI, BCI (H/I)-High patients also showed significant benefit (10.3% DFI; HR = 0.41 [95% CI 0.18-0.91]; P = 0.047) while BCI (H/I)-Low patients did not (-1.7% DFI; HR = 1.10 [95% CI 0.75-1.62] P = 0.612). As demonstrated in the overall N+ cohort, significant interaction between BCI (H/I) and treatment was shown in the HER2- subset (RFI P = 0.045; DFI P = 0.044). Notably, three-way interaction evaluating BCI (H/I), treatment and HER2 status was not statistically significant (P = 0.85), indicating the ability of BCI (H/I) to predict benefit of EET activity was not significantly affected by HER2 status. Conclusions: In this updated Trans-aTTom analysis with HER2 data, BCI (H/I) showed similar predictive performance for EET response in the HER2- subset when compared to the overall N+ cohort. These data further support the clinical utility of BCI (H/I) as a predictive biomarker for informing EET benefit in HR+/HER2- and HR+/HER2+ disease. Clinical trial information: NCT00003678 . [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Bartlett
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dennis C. Sgroi
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Tammy Piper
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | - Ikhlaaq Ahmed
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Lucy Doos
- University of Birmingham, United Kingdom, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Sarah Pirrie
- School of Cancer Sciences, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Daniel William Rea
- University of Birmingham, Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Aaltonen LA, Abascal F, Abeshouse A, Aburatani H, Adams DJ, Agrawal N, Ahn KS, Ahn SM, Aikata H, Akbani R, Akdemir KC, Al-Ahmadie H, Al-Sedairy ST, Al-Shahrour F, Alawi M, Albert M, Aldape K, Alexandrov LB, Ally A, Alsop K, Alvarez EG, Amary F, Amin SB, Aminou B, Ammerpohl O, Anderson MJ, Ang Y, Antonello D, Anur P, Aparicio S, Appelbaum EL, Arai Y, Aretz A, Arihiro K, Ariizumi SI, Armenia J, Arnould L, Asa S, Assenov Y, Atwal G, Aukema S, Auman JT, Aure MRR, Awadalla P, Aymerich M, Bader GD, Baez-Ortega A, Bailey MH, Bailey PJ, Balasundaram M, Balu S, Bandopadhayay P, Banks RE, Barbi S, Barbour AP, Barenboim J, Barnholtz-Sloan J, Barr H, Barrera E, Bartlett J, Bartolome J, Bassi C, Bathe OF, Baumhoer D, Bavi P, Baylin SB, Bazant W, Beardsmore D, Beck TA, Behjati S, Behren A, Niu B, Bell C, Beltran S, Benz C, Berchuck A, Bergmann AK, Bergstrom EN, Berman BP, Berney DM, Bernhart SH, Beroukhim R, Berrios M, Bersani S, Bertl J, Betancourt M, Bhandari V, Bhosle SG, Biankin AV, Bieg M, Bigner D, Binder H, Birney E, Birrer M, Biswas NK, Bjerkehagen B, Bodenheimer T, Boice L, Bonizzato G, De Bono JS, Boot A, Bootwalla MS, Borg A, Borkhardt A, Boroevich KA, Borozan I, Borst C, Bosenberg M, Bosio M, Boultwood J, Bourque G, Boutros PC, Bova GS, Bowen DT, Bowlby R, Bowtell DDL, Boyault S, Boyce R, Boyd J, Brazma A, Brennan P, Brewer DS, Brinkman AB, Bristow RG, Broaddus RR, Brock JE, Brock M, Broeks A, Brooks AN, Brooks D, Brors B, Brunak S, Bruxner TJC, Bruzos AL, Buchanan A, Buchhalter I, Buchholz C, Bullman S, Burke H, Burkhardt B, Burns KH, Busanovich J, Bustamante CD, Butler AP, Butte AJ, Byrne NJ, Børresen-Dale AL, Caesar-Johnson SJ, Cafferkey A, Cahill D, Calabrese C, Caldas C, Calvo F, Camacho N, Campbell PJ, Campo E, Cantù C, Cao S, Carey TE, Carlevaro-Fita J, Carlsen R, Cataldo I, Cazzola M, Cebon J, Cerfolio R, Chadwick DE, Chakravarty D, Chalmers D, Chan CWY, Chan K, Chan-Seng-Yue M, Chandan VS, Chang DK, Chanock SJ, Chantrill LA, Chateigner A, Chatterjee N, Chayama K, Chen HW, Chen J, Chen K, Chen Y, Chen Z, Cherniack AD, Chien J, Chiew YE, Chin SF, Cho J, Cho S, Choi JK, Choi W, Chomienne C, Chong Z, Choo SP, Chou A, Christ AN, Christie EL, Chuah E, Cibulskis C, Cibulskis K, Cingarlini S, Clapham P, Claviez A, Cleary S, Cloonan N, Cmero M, Collins CC, Connor AA, Cooke SL, Cooper CS, Cope L, Corbo V, Cordes MG, Cordner SM, Cortés-Ciriano I, Covington K, Cowin PA, Craft B, Craft D, Creighton CJ, Cun Y, Curley E, Cutcutache I, Czajka K, Czerniak B, Dagg RA, Danilova L, Davi MV, Davidson NR, Davies H, Davis IJ, Davis-Dusenbery BN, Dawson KJ, De La Vega FM, De Paoli-Iseppi R, Defreitas T, Tos APD, Delaneau O, Demchok JA, Demeulemeester J, Demidov GM, Demircioğlu D, Dennis NM, Denroche RE, Dentro SC, Desai N, Deshpande V, Deshwar AG, Desmedt C, Deu-Pons J, Dhalla N, Dhani NC, Dhingra P, Dhir R, DiBiase A, Diamanti K, Ding L, Ding S, Dinh HQ, Dirix L, Doddapaneni H, Donmez N, Dow MT, Drapkin R, Drechsel O, Drews RM, Serge S, Dudderidge T, Dueso-Barroso A, Dunford AJ, Dunn M, Dursi LJ, Duthie FR, Dutton-Regester K, Eagles J, Easton DF, Edmonds S, Edwards PA, Edwards SE, Eeles RA, Ehinger A, Eils J, Eils R, El-Naggar A, Eldridge M, Ellrott K, Erkek S, Escaramis G, Espiritu SMG, Estivill X, Etemadmoghadam D, Eyfjord JE, Faltas BM, Fan D, Fan Y, Faquin WC, Farcas C, Fassan M, Fatima A, Favero F, Fayzullaev N, Felau I, Fereday S, Ferguson ML, Ferretti V, Feuerbach L, Field MA, Fink JL, Finocchiaro G, Fisher C, Fittall MW, Fitzgerald A, Fitzgerald RC, Flanagan AM, Fleshner NE, Flicek P, Foekens JA, Fong KM, Fonseca NA, Foster CS, Fox NS, Fraser M, Frazer S, Frenkel-Morgenstern M, Friedman W, Frigola J, Fronick CC, Fujimoto A, Fujita M, Fukayama M, Fulton LA, Fulton RS, Furuta M, Futreal PA, Füllgrabe A, Gabriel SB, Gallinger S, Gambacorti-Passerini C, Gao J, Gao S, Garraway L, Garred Ø, Garrison E, Garsed DW, Gehlenborg N, Gelpi JLL, George J, Gerhard DS, Gerhauser C, Gershenwald JE, Gerstein M, Gerstung M, Getz G, Ghori M, Ghossein R, Giama NH, Gibbs RA, Gibson B, Gill AJ, Gill P, Giri DD, Glodzik D, Gnanapragasam VJ, Goebler ME, Goldman MJ, Gomez C, Gonzalez S, Gonzalez-Perez A, Gordenin DA, Gossage J, Gotoh K, Govindan R, Grabau D, Graham JS, Grant RC, Green AR, Green E, Greger L, Grehan N, Grimaldi S, Grimmond SM, Grossman RL, Grundhoff A, Gundem G, Guo Q, Gupta M, Gupta S, Gut IG, Gut M, Göke J, Ha G, Haake A, Haan D, Haas S, Haase K, Haber JE, Habermann N, Hach F, Haider S, Hama N, Hamdy FC, Hamilton A, Hamilton MP, Han L, Hanna GB, Hansmann M, Haradhvala NJ, Harismendy O, Harliwong I, Harmanci AO, Harrington E, Hasegawa T, Haussler D, Hawkins S, Hayami S, Hayashi S, Hayes DN, Hayes SJ, Hayward NK, Hazell S, He Y, Heath AP, Heath SC, Hedley D, Hegde AM, Heiman DI, Heinold MC, Heins Z, Heisler LE, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Helmy M, Heo SG, Hepperla AJ, Heredia-Genestar JM, Herrmann C, Hersey P, Hess JM, Hilmarsdottir H, Hinton J, Hirano S, Hiraoka N, Hoadley KA, Hobolth A, Hodzic E, Hoell JI, Hoffmann S, Hofmann O, Holbrook A, Holik AZ, Hollingsworth MA, Holmes O, Holt RA, Hong C, Hong EP, Hong JH, Hooijer GK, Hornshøj H, Hosoda F, Hou Y, Hovestadt V, Howat W, Hoyle AP, Hruban RH, Hu J, Hu T, Hua X, Huang KL, Huang M, Huang MN, Huang V, Huang Y, Huber W, Hudson TJ, Hummel M, Hung JA, Huntsman D, Hupp TR, Huse J, Huska MR, Hutter B, Hutter CM, Hübschmann D, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Imbusch CD, Imielinski M, Imoto S, Isaacs WB, Isaev K, Ishikawa S, Iskar M, Islam SMA, Ittmann M, Ivkovic S, Izarzugaza JMG, Jacquemier J, Jakrot V, Jamieson NB, Jang GH, Jang SJ, Jayaseelan JC, Jayasinghe R, Jefferys SR, Jegalian K, Jennings JL, Jeon SH, Jerman L, Ji Y, Jiao W, Johansson PA, Johns AL, Johns J, Johnson R, Johnson TA, Jolly C, Joly Y, Jonasson JG, Jones CD, Jones DR, Jones DTW, Jones N, Jones SJM, Jonkers J, Ju YS, Juhl H, Jung J, Juul M, Juul RI, Juul S, Jäger N, Kabbe R, Kahles A, Kahraman A, Kaiser VB, Kakavand H, Kalimuthu S, von Kalle C, Kang KJ, Karaszi K, Karlan B, Karlić R, Karsch D, Kasaian K, Kassahn KS, Katai H, Kato M, Katoh H, Kawakami Y, Kay JD, Kazakoff SH, Kazanov MD, Keays M, Kebebew E, Kefford RF, Kellis M, Kench JG, Kennedy CJ, Kerssemakers JNA, Khoo D, Khoo V, Khuntikeo N, Khurana E, Kilpinen H, Kim HK, Kim HL, Kim HY, Kim H, Kim J, Kim J, Kim JK, Kim Y, King TA, Klapper W, Kleinheinz K, Klimczak LJ, Knappskog S, Kneba M, Knoppers BM, Koh Y, Komorowski J, Komura D, Komura M, Kong G, Kool M, Korbel JO, Korchina V, Korshunov A, Koscher M, Koster R, Kote-Jarai Z, Koures A, Kovacevic M, Kremeyer B, Kretzmer H, Kreuz M, Krishnamurthy S, Kube D, Kumar K, Kumar P, Kumar S, Kumar Y, Kundra R, Kübler K, Küppers R, Lagergren J, Lai PH, Laird PW, Lakhani SR, Lalansingh CM, Lalonde E, Lamaze FC, Lambert A, Lander E, Landgraf P, Landoni L, Langerød A, Lanzós A, Larsimont D, Larsson E, Lathrop M, Lau LMS, Lawerenz C, Lawlor RT, Lawrence MS, Lazar AJ, Lazic AM, Le X, Lee D, Lee D, Lee EA, Lee HJ, Lee JJK, Lee JY, Lee J, Lee MTM, Lee-Six H, Lehmann KV, Lehrach H, Lenze D, Leonard CR, Leongamornlert DA, Leshchiner I, Letourneau L, Letunic I, Levine DA, Lewis L, Ley T, Li C, Li CH, Li HI, Li J, Li L, Li S, Li S, Li X, Li X, Li X, Li Y, Liang H, Liang SB, Lichter P, Lin P, Lin Z, Linehan WM, Lingjærde OC, Liu D, Liu EM, Liu FFF, Liu F, Liu J, Liu X, Livingstone J, Livitz D, Livni N, Lochovsky L, Loeffler M, Long GV, Lopez-Guillermo A, Lou S, Louis DN, Lovat LB, Lu Y, Lu YJ, Lu Y, Luchini C, Lungu I, Luo X, Luxton HJ, Lynch AG, Lype L, López C, López-Otín C, Ma EZ, Ma Y, MacGrogan G, MacRae S, Macintyre G, Madsen T, Maejima K, Mafficini A, Maglinte DT, Maitra A, Majumder PP, Malcovati L, Malikic S, Malleo G, Mann GJ, Mantovani-Löffler L, Marchal K, Marchegiani G, Mardis ER, Margolin AA, Marin MG, Markowetz F, Markowski J, Marks J, Marques-Bonet T, Marra MA, Marsden L, Martens JWM, Martin S, Martin-Subero JI, Martincorena I, Martinez-Fundichely A, Maruvka YE, Mashl RJ, Massie CE, Matthew TJ, Matthews L, Mayer E, Mayes S, Mayo M, Mbabaali F, McCune K, McDermott U, McGillivray PD, McLellan MD, McPherson JD, McPherson JR, McPherson TA, Meier SR, Meng A, Meng S, Menzies A, Merrett ND, Merson S, Meyerson M, Meyerson W, Mieczkowski PA, Mihaiescu GL, Mijalkovic S, Mikkelsen T, Milella M, Mileshkin L, Miller CA, Miller DK, Miller JK, Mills GB, Milovanovic A, Minner S, Miotto M, Arnau GM, Mirabello L, Mitchell C, Mitchell TJ, Miyano S, Miyoshi N, Mizuno S, Molnár-Gábor F, Moore MJ, Moore RA, Morganella S, Morris QD, Morrison C, Mose LE, Moser CD, Muiños F, Mularoni L, Mungall AJ, Mungall K, Musgrove EA, Mustonen V, Mutch D, Muyas F, Muzny DM, Muñoz A, Myers J, Myklebost O, Möller P, Nagae G, Nagrial AM, Nahal-Bose HK, Nakagama H, Nakagawa H, Nakamura H, Nakamura T, Nakano K, Nandi T, Nangalia J, Nastic M, Navarro A, Navarro FCP, Neal DE, Nettekoven G, Newell F, Newhouse SJ, Newton Y, Ng AWT, Ng A, Nicholson J, Nicol D, Nie Y, Nielsen GP, Nielsen MM, Nik-Zainal S, Noble MS, Nones K, Northcott PA, Notta F, O’Connor BD, O’Donnell P, O’Donovan M, O’Meara S, O’Neill BP, O’Neill JR, Ocana D, Ochoa A, Oesper L, Ogden C, Ohdan H, Ohi K, Ohno-Machado L, Oien KA, Ojesina AI, Ojima H, Okusaka T, Omberg L, Ong CK, Ossowski S, Ott G, Ouellette BFF, P’ng C, Paczkowska M, Paiella S, Pairojkul C, Pajic M, Pan-Hammarström Q, Papaemmanuil E, Papatheodorou I, Paramasivam N, Park JW, Park JW, Park K, Park K, Park PJ, Parker JS, Parsons SL, Pass H, Pasternack D, Pastore A, Patch AM, Pauporté I, Pea A, Pearson JV, Pedamallu CS, Pedersen JS, Pederzoli P, Peifer M, Pennell NA, Perou CM, Perry MD, Petersen GM, Peto M, Petrelli N, Petryszak R, Pfister SM, Phillips M, Pich O, Pickett HA, Pihl TD, Pillay N, Pinder S, Pinese M, Pinho AV, Pitkänen E, Pivot X, Piñeiro-Yáñez E, Planko L, Plass C, Polak P, Pons T, Popescu I, Potapova O, Prasad A, Preston SR, Prinz M, Pritchard AL, Prokopec SD, Provenzano E, Puente XS, Puig S, Puiggròs M, Pulido-Tamayo S, Pupo GM, Purdie CA, Quinn MC, Rabionet R, Rader JS, Radlwimmer B, Radovic P, Raeder B, Raine KM, Ramakrishna M, Ramakrishnan K, Ramalingam S, Raphael BJ, Rathmell WK, Rausch T, Reifenberger G, Reimand J, Reis-Filho J, Reuter V, Reyes-Salazar I, Reyna MA, Reynolds SM, Rheinbay E, Riazalhosseini Y, Richardson AL, Richter J, Ringel M, Ringnér M, Rino Y, Rippe K, Roach J, Roberts LR, Roberts ND, Roberts SA, Robertson AG, Robertson AJ, Rodriguez JB, Rodriguez-Martin B, Rodríguez-González FG, Roehrl MHA, Rohde M, Rokutan H, Romieu G, Rooman I, Roques T, Rosebrock D, Rosenberg M, Rosenstiel PC, Rosenwald A, Rowe EW, Royo R, Rozen SG, Rubanova Y, Rubin MA, Rubio-Perez C, Rudneva VA, Rusev BC, Ruzzenente A, Rätsch G, Sabarinathan R, Sabelnykova VY, Sadeghi S, Sahinalp SC, Saini N, Saito-Adachi M, Saksena G, Salcedo A, Salgado R, Salichos L, Sallari R, Saller C, Salvia R, Sam M, Samra JS, Sanchez-Vega F, Sander C, Sanders G, Sarin R, Sarrafi I, Sasaki-Oku A, Sauer T, Sauter G, Saw RPM, Scardoni M, Scarlett CJ, Scarpa A, Scelo G, Schadendorf D, Schein JE, Schilhabel MB, Schlesner M, Schlomm T, Schmidt HK, Schramm SJ, Schreiber S, Schultz N, Schumacher SE, Schwarz RF, Scolyer RA, Scott D, Scully R, Seethala R, Segre AV, Selander I, Semple CA, Senbabaoglu Y, Sengupta S, Sereni E, Serra S, Sgroi DC, Shackleton M, Shah NC, Shahabi S, Shang CA, Shang P, Shapira O, Shelton T, Shen C, Shen H, Shepherd R, Shi R, Shi Y, Shiah YJ, Shibata T, Shih J, Shimizu E, Shimizu K, Shin SJ, Shiraishi Y, Shmaya T, Shmulevich I, Shorser SI, Short C, Shrestha R, Shringarpure SS, Shriver C, Shuai S, Sidiropoulos N, Siebert R, Sieuwerts AM, Sieverling L, Signoretti S, Sikora KO, Simbolo M, Simon R, Simons JV, Simpson JT, Simpson PT, Singer S, Sinnott-Armstrong N, Sipahimalani P, Skelly TJ, Smid M, Smith J, Smith-McCune K, Socci ND, Sofia HJ, Soloway MG, Song L, Sood AK, Sothi S, Sotiriou C, Soulette CM, Span PN, Spellman PT, Sperandio N, Spillane AJ, Spiro O, Spring J, Staaf J, Stadler PF, Staib P, Stark SG, Stebbings L, Stefánsson ÓA, Stegle O, Stein LD, Stenhouse A, Stewart C, Stilgenbauer S, Stobbe MD, Stratton MR, Stretch JR, Struck AJ, Stuart JM, Stunnenberg HG, Su H, Su X, Sun RX, Sungalee S, Susak H, Suzuki A, Sweep F, Szczepanowski M, Sültmann H, Yugawa T, Tam A, Tamborero D, Tan BKT, Tan D, Tan P, Tanaka H, Taniguchi H, Tanskanen TJ, Tarabichi M, Tarnuzzer R, Tarpey P, Taschuk ML, Tatsuno K, Tavaré S, Taylor DF, Taylor-Weiner A, Teague JW, Teh BT, Tembe V, Temes J, Thai K, Thayer SP, Thiessen N, Thomas G, Thomas S, Thompson A, Thompson AM, Thompson JFF, Thompson RH, Thorne H, Thorne LB, Thorogood A, Tiao G, Tijanic N, Timms LE, Tirabosco R, Tojo M, Tommasi S, Toon CW, Toprak UH, Torrents D, Tortora G, Tost J, Totoki Y, Townend D, Traficante N, Treilleux I, Trotta JR, Trümper LHP, Tsao M, Tsunoda T, Tubio JMC, Tucker O, Turkington R, Turner DJ, Tutt A, Ueno M, Ueno NT, Umbricht C, Umer HM, Underwood TJ, Urban L, Urushidate T, Ushiku T, Uusküla-Reimand L, Valencia A, Van Den Berg DJ, Van Laere S, Van Loo P, Van Meir EG, Van den Eynden GG, Van der Kwast T, Vasudev N, Vazquez M, Vedururu R, Veluvolu U, Vembu S, Verbeke LPC, Vermeulen P, Verrill C, Viari A, Vicente D, Vicentini C, VijayRaghavan K, Viksna J, Vilain RE, Villasante I, Vincent-Salomon A, Visakorpi T, Voet D, Vyas P, Vázquez-García I, Waddell NM, Waddell N, Wadelius C, Wadi L, Wagener R, Wala JA, Wang J, Wang J, Wang L, Wang Q, Wang W, Wang Y, Wang Z, Waring PM, Warnatz HJ, Warrell J, Warren AY, Waszak SM, Wedge DC, Weichenhan D, Weinberger P, Weinstein JN, Weischenfeldt J, Weisenberger DJ, Welch I, Wendl MC, Werner J, Whalley JP, Wheeler DA, Whitaker HC, Wigle D, Wilkerson MD, Williams A, Wilmott JS, Wilson GW, Wilson JM, Wilson RK, Winterhoff B, Wintersinger JA, Wiznerowicz M, Wolf S, Wong BH, Wong T, Wong W, Woo Y, Wood S, Wouters BG, Wright AJ, Wright DW, Wright MH, Wu CL, Wu DY, Wu G, Wu J, Wu K, Wu Y, Wu Z, Xi L, Xia T, Xiang Q, Xiao X, Xing R, Xiong H, Xu Q, Xu Y, Xue H, Yachida S, Yakneen S, Yamaguchi R, Yamaguchi TN, Yamamoto M, Yamamoto S, Yamaue H, Yang F, Yang H, Yang JY, Yang L, Yang L, Yang S, Yang TP, Yang Y, Yao X, Yaspo ML, Yates L, Yau C, Ye C, Ye K, Yellapantula VD, Yoon CJ, Yoon SS, Yousif F, Yu J, Yu K, Yu W, Yu Y, Yuan K, Yuan Y, Yuen D, Yung CK, Zaikova O, Zamora J, Zapatka M, Zenklusen JC, Zenz T, Zeps N, Zhang CZ, Zhang F, Zhang H, Zhang H, Zhang H, Zhang J, Zhang J, Zhang J, Zhang X, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Zhao Z, Zheng L, Zheng X, Zhou W, Zhou Y, Zhu B, Zhu H, Zhu J, Zhu S, Zou L, Zou X, deFazio A, van As N, van Deurzen CHM, van de Vijver MJ, van’t Veer L, von Mering C. Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes. Nature 2020; 578:82-93. [PMID: 32025007 PMCID: PMC7025898 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-1969-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1435] [Impact Index Per Article: 358.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Cancer is driven by genetic change, and the advent of massively parallel sequencing has enabled systematic documentation of this variation at the whole-genome scale1-3. Here we report the integrative analysis of 2,658 whole-cancer genomes and their matching normal tissues across 38 tumour types from the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium of the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We describe the generation of the PCAWG resource, facilitated by international data sharing using compute clouds. On average, cancer genomes contained 4-5 driver mutations when combining coding and non-coding genomic elements; however, in around 5% of cases no drivers were identified, suggesting that cancer driver discovery is not yet complete. Chromothripsis, in which many clustered structural variants arise in a single catastrophic event, is frequently an early event in tumour evolution; in acral melanoma, for example, these events precede most somatic point mutations and affect several cancer-associated genes simultaneously. Cancers with abnormal telomere maintenance often originate from tissues with low replicative activity and show several mechanisms of preventing telomere attrition to critical levels. Common and rare germline variants affect patterns of somatic mutation, including point mutations, structural variants and somatic retrotransposition. A collection of papers from the PCAWG Consortium describes non-coding mutations that drive cancer beyond those in the TERT promoter4; identifies new signatures of mutational processes that cause base substitutions, small insertions and deletions and structural variation5,6; analyses timings and patterns of tumour evolution7; describes the diverse transcriptional consequences of somatic mutation on splicing, expression levels, fusion genes and promoter activity8,9; and evaluates a range of more-specialized features of cancer genomes8,10-18.
Collapse
|
12
|
Bartlett JMS, Sgroi DC, Treuner K, Zhang Y, Ahmed I, Piper T, Salunga R, Brachtel EF, Pirrie SJ, Schnabel CA, Rea DW. Breast Cancer Index and prediction of benefit from extended endocrine therapy in breast cancer patients treated in the Adjuvant Tamoxifen-To Offer More? (aTTom) trial. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1776-1783. [PMID: 31504126 PMCID: PMC6927322 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extending the duration of adjuvant endocrine therapy reduces the risk of recurrence in a subset of women with early-stage hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer. Validated predictive biomarkers of endocrine response could significantly improve patient selection for extended therapy. Breast cancer index (BCI) [HOXB13/IL17BR ratio (H/I)] was evaluated for its ability to predict benefit from extended endocrine therapy in patients previously randomized in the Adjuvant Tamoxifen-To Offer More? (aTTom) trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS Trans-aTTom is a multi-institutional, prospective-retrospective study in patients with available formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary tumor blocks. BCI testing and central determination of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status by immunohistochemistry were carried out blinded to clinical outcome. Survival endpoints were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression with recurrence-free interval (RFI) as the primary endpoint. Interaction between extended endocrine therapy and BCI (H/I) was assessed using the likelihood ratio test. RESULTS Of 583 HR+, N+ patients analyzed, 49% classified as BCI (H/I)-High derived a significant benefit from 10 versus 5 years of tamoxifen treatment [hazard ratio (HR): 0.35; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15-0.86; 10.2% absolute risk reduction based on RFI, P = 0.027]. BCI (H/I)-low patients showed no significant benefit from extended endocrine therapy (HR: 1.07; 95% CI 0.69-1.65; -0.2% absolute risk reduction; P = 0.768). Continuous BCI (H/I) levels predicted the magnitude of benefit from extended tamoxifen, whereas centralized ER and PR did not. Interaction between extended tamoxifen treatment and BCI (H/I) was statistically significant (P = 0.012), adjusting for clinicopathological factors. CONCLUSION BCI by high H/I expression was predictive of endocrine response and identified a subset of HR+, N+ patients with significant benefit from 10 versus 5 years of tamoxifen therapy. These data provide further validation, consistent with previous MA.17 data, establishing level 1B evidence for BCI as a predictive biomarker of benefit from extended endocrine therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN17222211; NCT00003678.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M S Bartlett
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - D C Sgroi
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - K Treuner
- Biotheranostics Inc., San Diego, USA
| | - Y Zhang
- Biotheranostics Inc., San Diego, USA
| | - I Ahmed
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - T Piper
- University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, UK
| | - R Salunga
- Biotheranostics Inc., San Diego, USA
| | - E F Brachtel
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - S J Pirrie
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - D W Rea
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yan C, Brunson DC, Tang Q, Do D, Iftimia NA, Moore JC, Hayes MN, Welker AM, Garcia EG, Dubash TD, Hong X, Drapkin BJ, Myers DT, Phat S, Volorio A, Marvin DL, Ligorio M, Dershowitz L, McCarthy KM, Karabacak MN, Fletcher JA, Sgroi DC, Iafrate JA, Maheswaran S, Dyson NJ, Haber DA, Rawls JF, Langenau DM. Visualizing Engrafted Human Cancer and Therapy Responses in Immunodeficient Zebrafish. Cell 2019; 177:1903-1914.e14. [PMID: 31031007 PMCID: PMC6570580 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 168] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2018] [Revised: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/31/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Xenograft cell transplantation into immunodeficient mice has become the gold standard for assessing pre-clinical efficacy of cancer drugs, yet direct visualization of single-cell phenotypes is difficult. Here, we report an optically-clear prkdc-/-, il2rga-/- zebrafish that lacks adaptive and natural killer immune cells, can engraft a wide array of human cancers at 37°C, and permits the dynamic visualization of single engrafted cells. For example, photoconversion cell-lineage tracing identified migratory and proliferative cell states in human rhabdomyosarcoma, a pediatric cancer of muscle. Additional experiments identified the preclinical efficacy of combination olaparib PARP inhibitor and temozolomide DNA-damaging agent as an effective therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma and visualized therapeutic responses using a four-color FUCCI cell-cycle fluorescent reporter. These experiments identified that combination treatment arrested rhabdomyosarcoma cells in the G2 cell cycle prior to induction of apoptosis. Finally, patient-derived xenografts could be engrafted into our model, opening new avenues for developing personalized therapeutic approaches in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuan Yan
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Dalton C Brunson
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Bethesda, MD 20815, USA
| | - Qin Tang
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Bethesda, MD 20815, USA
| | - Daniel Do
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Bethesda, MD 20815, USA
| | - Nicolae A Iftimia
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - John C Moore
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Madeline N Hayes
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Alessandra M Welker
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Elaine G Garcia
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Taronish D Dubash
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Xin Hong
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Benjamin J Drapkin
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - David T Myers
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Sarah Phat
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Angela Volorio
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Dieuwke L Marvin
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Matteo Ligorio
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Lyle Dershowitz
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Karin M McCarthy
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Murat N Karabacak
- Shriners Hospitals for Children-Boston, MA 02114, USA; Center for Engineering in Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Jonathan A Fletcher
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Dennis C Sgroi
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - John A Iafrate
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Shyamala Maheswaran
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Nick J Dyson
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Daniel A Haber
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Bethesda, MD 20815, USA
| | - John F Rawls
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - David M Langenau
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Matissek KJ, Onozato ML, Sun S, Zheng Z, Schultz A, Lee J, Patel K, Jerevall PL, Saladi SV, Macleay A, Tavallai M, Badovinac-Crnjevic T, Barrios C, Beşe N, Chan A, Chavarri-Guerra Y, Debiasi M, Demirdögen E, Egeli Ü, Gökgöz S, Gomez H, Liedke P, Tasdelen I, Tolunay S, Werutsky G, St Louis J, Horick N, Finkelstein DM, Le LP, Bardia A, Goss PE, Sgroi DC, Iafrate AJ, Ellisen LW. Expressed Gene Fusions as Frequent Drivers of Poor Outcomes in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. Cancer Discov 2017; 8:336-353. [PMID: 29242214 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-17-0535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2017] [Revised: 11/09/2017] [Accepted: 12/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
We sought to uncover genetic drivers of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer, using a targeted next-generation sequencing approach for detecting expressed gene rearrangements without prior knowledge of the fusion partners. We identified intergenic fusions involving driver genes, including PIK3CA, AKT3, RAF1, and ESR1, in 14% (24/173) of unselected patients with advanced HR+ breast cancer. FISH confirmed the corresponding chromosomal rearrangements in both primary and metastatic tumors. Expression of novel kinase fusions in nontransformed cells deregulates phosphoprotein signaling, cell proliferation, and survival in three-dimensional culture, whereas expression in HR+ breast cancer models modulates estrogen-dependent growth and confers hormonal therapy resistance in vitro and in vivo Strikingly, shorter overall survival was observed in patients with rearrangement-positive versus rearrangement-negative tumors. Correspondingly, fusions were uncommon (<5%) among 300 patients presenting with primary HR+ breast cancer. Collectively, our findings identify expressed gene fusions as frequent and potentially actionable drivers in HR+ breast cancer.Significance: By using a powerful clinical molecular diagnostic assay, we identified expressed intergenic fusions as frequent contributors to treatment resistance and poor survival in advanced HR+ breast cancer. The prevalence and biological and prognostic significance of these alterations suggests that their detection may alter clinical management and bring to light new therapeutic opportunities. Cancer Discov; 8(3); 336-53. ©2017 AACR.See related commentary by Natrajan et al., p. 272See related article by Liu et al., p. 354This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 253.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karina J Matissek
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Maristela L Onozato
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sheng Sun
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Zongli Zheng
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Andrew Schultz
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jesse Lee
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kristofer Patel
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Piiha-Lotta Jerevall
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Srinivas Vinod Saladi
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Allison Macleay
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mehrad Tavallai
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Carlos Barrios
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG) and Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Nuran Beşe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Acibadem Breast Research Institute, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Yanin Chavarri-Guerra
- Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubiran, México City D.F., México
| | - Marcio Debiasi
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG) and Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Elif Demirdögen
- Departments of Medical Biology, General Surgery, Pathology of Medical Faculty of Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Ünal Egeli
- Departments of Medical Biology, General Surgery, Pathology of Medical Faculty of Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Sahsuvar Gökgöz
- Departments of Medical Biology, General Surgery, Pathology of Medical Faculty of Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Henry Gomez
- Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Perú
| | - Pedro Liedke
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG) and Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Ismet Tasdelen
- Departments of Medical Biology, General Surgery, Pathology of Medical Faculty of Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Sahsine Tolunay
- Departments of Medical Biology, General Surgery, Pathology of Medical Faculty of Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Gustavo Werutsky
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG) and Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Jessica St Louis
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nora Horick
- Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dianne M Finkelstein
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Long Phi Le
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Paul E Goss
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dennis C Sgroi
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - A John Iafrate
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Leif W Ellisen
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zhang Y, Schroeder BE, Jerevall PL, Ly A, Nolan H, Schnabel CA, Sgroi DC. A Novel Breast Cancer Index for Prediction of Distant Recurrence in HR + Early-Stage Breast Cancer with One to Three Positive Nodes. Clin Cancer Res 2017; 23:7217-7224. [PMID: 28939745 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-1688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2017] [Revised: 07/28/2017] [Accepted: 09/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: The study objective was to characterize the prognostic performance of a novel Breast Cancer Index model (BCIN+), an integration of BCI gene expression, tumor size, and grade, specifically developed for assessment of distant recurrence (DR) risk in HR+ breast cancer patients with one to three positive lymph nodes (pN1).Experimental Design: Analysis was conducted in a well-annotated retrospective series of pN1 patients (N = 402) treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy with or without chemotherapy using a prespecified model. The primary endpoint was time-to-DR. Results were determined blinded to clinical outcome. Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall (0-15 years) and late (≥5 years) DR, HRs, and 95% confidence interval (CIs) were estimated. Likelihood ratio statistics assessed relative contributions of prognostic information.Results: BCIN+ classified 81 patients (20%) as low risk with a 15-year DR rate of 1.3% (95% CI, 0.0%-3.7%) versus 321 patients as high risk with a DR rate of 29.0% (95% CI, 23.2%-34.4%). In patients DR-free for ≥5 years (n = 349), the late DR rate was 1.3% (95% CI, 0.0%-3.7%) and 16.1% (95% CI, 10.6%-21.3%) in low- and high-risk groups, respectively. BCI gene expression alone was significantly prognostic (ΔLR-χ2 = 20.12; P < 0.0001). Addition of tumor size (ΔLR-χ2 = 13.29, P = 0.0003) and grade (ΔLR-χ2 = 12.72; P = 0.0004) significantly improved prognostic performance. BCI added significant prognostic information to tumor size (ΔLR-χ2 = 17.55; P < 0.0001); addition to tumor grade was incremental (ΔLR-χ2 = 2.38; P = 0.1) with considerable overlap between prognostic values (ΔLR-χ2 = 17.74).Conclusions: The integrated BCIN+ identified 20% of pN1 patients with limited risk of recurrence over 15 years, in whom extended endocrine treatment may be spared. Ongoing studies will characterize combined clinical-genomic risk assessment in node-positive patients. Clin Cancer Res; 23(23); 7217-24. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Zhang
- Biotheranostics, Inc., San Diego, California
| | | | | | - Amy Ly
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Pathology, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hannah Nolan
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Pathology, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Dennis C Sgroi
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Pathology, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhang Y, Jerevall PL, Schroeder BE, Ly A, Nolan H, Schnabel CA, Sgroi DC. Abstract 4744: Clinical validation of a prognostic model integrating Breast Cancer Index (BCI) with tumor size and grade for prediction of late distant recurrence in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer with 1-3 positive nodes. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-4744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The Breast Cancer Index (BCI) 11-gene expression signature has been previously demonstrated to significantly predict risk of overall (10y), early (0-5y), and late (≥5y) distant recurrence in patients with HR+, node negative breast cancer. A distinct BCI model that integrated tumor size and grade (BCIN+) was developed and validated for prediction of distant recurrence in HR+ women with 1-3 positive nodes (N1) (Sestak et al., SABCS 2015, P2-08-12; Zhang et al, ASCO 2016, abstract no. 541). The objective of this analysis was to evaluate BCIN+ performance in the subset of patients that were treated with no more than 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy.
Methods: The validation study included 402 HR+ N1 patients diagnosed between 1993 to 2007 with ≥5y follow-up and available tumor blocks. Patients treated with ≤5y of endocrine therapy ± chemotherapy (n=276) were included in this analysis. BCIN+ risk scores and categories (low vs high, using a pre-defined cutpoint) were determined blinded to clinical outcome. Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall (0-15y) and late (≥5y) distant recurrence, hazard ratios and 95% CIs were estimated. Multivariate analysis adjusting for standard prognostic factors (age, tumor type, surgery type, PR and HER2 status) was performed using Cox proportional hazards model.
Results: Mean age was 53y. 99% were ER+, 89% PR+, and 14% HER2+. The majority of tumors were T1 (61%) or T2 (34%), and 16%, 53%, and 31% were grade 1, 2, and 3, respectively. 79% of patients were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. BCIN+ significantly separated patients into low and high risk groups for both overall (P<0.0001) and late (P=0.0067) distant recurrence. For overall distant recurrence, BCIN+ classified 18% of patients into the low risk group. The 15y risk of distant recurrence was 2.1% (95% CI: 0.0-6.0%) in the BCIN+ low risk group vs 36.8% (95% CI: 29.3-43.4%) in the high risk group (HR: 21.88; 95% CI: 3.04-157.32). Of patients that were distant recurrence-free for at least 5y, 22% were classified as BCIN+ low risk. The risk of distant recurrence at year 15 was 2.1% (95% CI: 0.0-6.0%) in the BCIN+ low risk group vs 19.0% (11.6-25.8%) in the high risk group (HR: 9.49; 95% CI: 1.29-69.7).
Conclusions: In this subset analysis from an independent validation study, BCIN+ identified a significant proportion of N1 patients that were associated with a considerably low 15y risk of distant recurrence after ≤5 years of endocrine therapy ± chemotherapy. BCIN+ may provide additional prognostic information to facilitate selection of N+ patients for extended endocrine treatment wherein patients identified as BCIN+ low may be considered adequately treated with adjuvant therapy alone.
Citation Format: Yi Zhang, Piiha-Lotta Jerevall, Brock E. Schroeder, Amy Ly, Hannah Nolan, Catherine A. Schnabel, Dennis C. Sgroi. Clinical validation of a prognostic model integrating Breast Cancer Index (BCI) with tumor size and grade for prediction of late distant recurrence in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer with 1-3 positive nodes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4744. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4744
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Amy Ly
- 2Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Le Gallo M, Rudd ML, Urick ME, Hansen NF, Zhang S, Lozy F, Sgroi DC, Vidal Bel A, Matias-Guiu X, Broaddus RR, Lu KH, Levine DA, Mutch DG, Goodfellow PJ, Salvesen HB, Mullikin JC, Bell DW. Somatic mutation profiles of clear cell endometrial tumors revealed by whole exome and targeted gene sequencing. Cancer 2017; 123:3261-3268. [PMID: 28485815 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2017] [Revised: 02/08/2017] [Accepted: 02/14/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The molecular pathogenesis of clear cell endometrial cancer (CCEC), a tumor type with a relatively unfavorable prognosis, is not well defined. We searched exome-wide for novel somatically mutated genes in CCEC and assessed the mutational spectrum of known and candidate driver genes in a large cohort of cases. METHODS We conducted whole exome sequencing of paired tumor-normal DNAs from 16 cases of CCEC (12 CCECs and the CCEC components of 4 mixed histology tumors). Twenty-two genes-of-interest were Sanger-sequenced from another 47 cases of CCEC. Microsatellite instability (MSI) and microsatellite stability (MSS) were determined by genotyping 5 mononucleotide repeats. RESULTS Two tumor exomes had relatively high mutational loads and MSI. The other 14 tumor exomes were MSS and had 236 validated nonsynonymous or splice junction somatic mutations among 222 protein-encoding genes. Among the 63 cases of CCEC in this study, we identified frequent somatic mutations in TP53 (39.7%), PIK3CA (23.8%), PIK3R1 (15.9%), ARID1A (15.9%), PPP2R1A (15.9%), SPOP (14.3%), and TAF1 (9.5%), as well as MSI (11.3%). Five of 8 mutations in TAF1, a gene with no known role in CCEC, localized to the putative histone acetyltransferase domain and included 2 recurrently mutated residues. Based on patterns of MSI and mutations in 7 genes, CCEC subsets molecularly resembled serous endometrial cancer (SEC) or endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC). CONCLUSION Our findings demonstrate molecular similarities between CCEC and SEC and EEC and implicate TAF1 as a novel candidate CCEC driver gene. Cancer 2017;123:3261-8. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthieu Le Gallo
- Cancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Meghan L Rudd
- Cancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Mary Ellen Urick
- Cancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Nancy F Hansen
- Cancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Suiyuan Zhang
- Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | -
- National Institutes of Health Intramural Sequencing Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Fred Lozy
- Cancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Dennis C Sgroi
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts.,Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts.,Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - August Vidal Bel
- Department of Pathology and Experimental Therapeutics, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics/Oncological Pathology Group, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Universitat de Lleida, IRB Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Russell R Broaddus
- Division of Surgery, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Karen H Lu
- Division of Surgery, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Douglas A Levine
- Gynecologic Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - David G Mutch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Paul J Goodfellow
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Helga B Salvesen
- Department of Clinical Science, Center for Cancer Biomarkers, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - James C Mullikin
- Cancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.,National Institutes of Health Intramural Sequencing Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Daphne W Bell
- Cancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Schroeder BE, Zhang Y, Stal O, Fornander T, Brufsky A, Sgroi DC, Schnabel CA. Abstract P2-05-14: Prognostic impact of genomic risk stratification with breast cancer index in patients with clinically low risk, hormone receptor-positive, node-negative, T1 breast cancer. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p2-05-14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Tumor size and nodal status are prognostic for risk of both early and late disease recurrence in patients with early stage, HR+ breast cancer, and are incorporated into both adjuvant chemotherapy and extended endocrine therapy treatment decisions. In a recent EBCTCG meta-analysis of over 46,000 patients [Pan H, et al. J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 505)], risk of late distant recurrence was assessed in patient subsets based on nodal status and tumor size. Patients with T1N0 disease who were treated with 5 years endocrine therapy had a good overall prognosis, with 4%, 9%, and 14% risk of distant recurrence from years 5-10, 5-15, and 5-20, respectively. Breast Cancer Index (BCI) has been validated as prognostic biomarker for risk of both early and late distant recurrence in multiple randomized trial cohorts. The aim of this analysis was to assess distant recurrence (DR) risk stratification with BCI in patients with clinically low-risk T1N0 tumors.
Methods: Primary tumor samples from the subset of patients with T1N0 disease from 2 independent validation cohorts of HR+ breast cancer patients were examined [Stockholm randomized controlled trial (N=259) and a retrospective multi-institutional cohort (N=237)]. Patients in the Stockholm RCT cohort were treated with adjuvant tamoxifen only; patients in the multi-institutional cohort were treated with adjuvant tamoxifen +/- chemotherapy (20.3%). No patients received extended endocrine therapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess the risk of DR within distinct BCI risk groups. Time dependent analysis was performed by combining BCI Low and Intermediate risk groups for risk of early recurrence (0-5y), and BCI Intermediate and High risk groups for risk of late recurrence (>5y).
Results: In the Stockholm cohort, BCI identified 13% of T1N0 patients as high risk for relapse within the first 5y, and these patients had a significantly reduced distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS, 85.3%) compared to BCI Low Risk patients (97.7%; P=0.0004). In patients disease-free at year 5, BCI identified 32% of patients as high risk for late recurrence; these patients had significantly lower DRFS (86.7%) between years 5-15 compared to BCI low risk patients (95.4%; P=0.0263). In the multi-institutional cohort, 22% of T1N0 patients were identified by BCI as high risk for relapse within the first 5y, and these patients had a significantly reduced DRFS (77.3%) compared to BCI low risk patients (96.2%; P<0.0001). In patients disease-free at year 5, 36% of patients were identified by BCI as high risk for late recurrence, with significantly lower DRFS (89.6%) between years 5-10 compared to BCI Low Risk patients (98.4%; P=0.008).
Conclusions: HR+ Patients with favorable clinical features (T1N0) have a good overall prognosis. However, results of this study demonstrated that adding molecular resolution on tumor biology with BCI identified a significant subset of women with higher risk of both early and late distant recurrence; findings support consideration of genomic classification in T1N0 patients to identify additional candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy and/or extended endocrine therapy, respectively.
Citation Format: Schroeder BE, Zhang Y, Stal O, Fornander T, Brufsky A, Sgroi DC, Schnabel CA. Prognostic impact of genomic risk stratification with breast cancer index in patients with clinically low risk, hormone receptor-positive, node-negative, T1 breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-05-14.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- BE Schroeder
- Biotheranostics, Inc., San Diego, CA; Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachesetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Y Zhang
- Biotheranostics, Inc., San Diego, CA; Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachesetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - O Stal
- Biotheranostics, Inc., San Diego, CA; Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachesetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - T Fornander
- Biotheranostics, Inc., San Diego, CA; Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachesetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - A Brufsky
- Biotheranostics, Inc., San Diego, CA; Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachesetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - DC Sgroi
- Biotheranostics, Inc., San Diego, CA; Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachesetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - CA Schnabel
- Biotheranostics, Inc., San Diego, CA; Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachesetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zhang Y, Jerevall PL, Schroeder BE, Ly A, Nolan H, Schnabel CA, Sgroi DC. Abstract P2-05-08: Impact of treatment history on prognostic ability of breast cancer index (BCI): Subset analysis from a validation study of patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer with 1-3 positive nodes. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p2-05-08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: A new BCI model integrating tumor size and grade (BCIN+) was specifically developed and validated for prediction of risk of overall (0-15y) and late (5-15y) distant recurrence (DR) in HR+ women with 1-3 positive nodes (N1). The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of treatment history on the prognostic performance of BCIN+ in a large clinical validation cohort of pre- and post-menopausal HR+, N1 patients.
Methods: The validation cohort was comprised of 402 HR+, N1 patients diagnosed at Massachusetts General Hospital between 1993-2007 with at least 5y of follow-up. BCIN+ risk scores were determined and patients stratified into low or high risk categories using a pre-specified cut-point blinded to clinical outcome. Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall (0-15y) and late (5-15y) DR were estimated and the difference was evaluated by log-rank test. Treatment-specific subsets were analyzed based on adjuvant endocrine (tamoxifen [TAM] only vs any history of aromatase inhibitors [AI]), and adjuvant chemotherapy treatment history.
Results: Mean age of patients was 53y. 99% were ER+, 91% PR+, and 13% HER2+. The majority of tumors were T1 (62%) or T2 (35%). Adjuvant endocrine treatment included TAM only for 191 (48%) patients and either AI only or a sequence of TAM and an AI in 211 (52%) patients. Most patients received chemotherapy (n=324; 81%). BCIN+ classified 20% and 80% as low and high risk, respectively.
In patients treated with TAM only, BCIN+ low and high risk had significantly different 15y rates of DR (95% CI) of 4.0% (0.0-11.4%) vs 41.7% (33.0-49.3%), respectively (p=0.0005). For patients disease-free at year 5, rates of late DR (5-15y) were 4.0% (0.0-11.5%) vs 20.0% (11.4-27.8%), respectively (p=0.04). In patients treated with an AI, BCIN+ low and high risk had significantly different 15y rates of DR of 0% (0.0-0.0%) vs 15.0% (8.1-21.5%), respectively (p=0.006). For patients disease-free at year 5, rates of late DR were 0.0% (0.0-0.0%) vs 12.2% (5.6-18.3%), respectively (p=0.02). There was no statistically significant difference in the prognostic performance of BCIN+ between patients treated with TAM only versus those with treatment including any history of AI (interaction p=0.99).
In the subset of patients treated with chemotherapy, BCIN+ classified 19% and 81% of patients as low and high risk with significantly different 15y rates of DR of 1.7% (0.0-4.9%) vs 30.9% (24.4-36.8%), respectively (p<0.0001). For patients disease-free at year 5, rates of late DR were 1.7% (0.0-4.9%) and 16.3% (10.2-21.9%), respectively (p=0.006).
Conclusions: In this subset analysis from a validation study of N1 patients, BCIN+ identified a significant proportion with a significantly low risk of late DR. This study confirms the ability of BCIN+ to identify a subset of patients with significantly low risk of recurrence across adjuvant endocrine and chemotherapy treatment backgrounds. BCIN+ may provide additional prognostic information to facilitate selection of N+ patients for extended endocrine treatment, wherein patients identified as BCIN+ low may be considered adequately treated with adjuvant therapy alone.
Citation Format: Zhang Y, Jerevall P-L, Schroeder BE, Ly A, Nolan H, Schnabel CA, Sgroi DC. Impact of treatment history on prognostic ability of breast cancer index (BCI): Subset analysis from a validation study of patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer with 1-3 positive nodes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-05-08.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Zhang
- Biotheranostics, Inc., San Diego, CA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, CA
| | - P-L Jerevall
- Biotheranostics, Inc., San Diego, CA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, CA
| | - BE Schroeder
- Biotheranostics, Inc., San Diego, CA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, CA
| | - A Ly
- Biotheranostics, Inc., San Diego, CA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, CA
| | - H Nolan
- Biotheranostics, Inc., San Diego, CA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, CA
| | - CA Schnabel
- Biotheranostics, Inc., San Diego, CA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, CA
| | - DC Sgroi
- Biotheranostics, Inc., San Diego, CA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, CA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis C. Sgroi
- Dennis C. Sgroi, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown and Boston, MA; and Adam Brufsky, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Adam Brufsky
- Dennis C. Sgroi, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown and Boston, MA; and Adam Brufsky, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chapman JAW, Sgroi DC, Goss PE, Zarella E, Binns S, Zhang Y, Schnabel CA, Erlander MG, Pritchard KI, Han L, Badovinac-Crnjevic T, Shepherd LE, Pollak MN. Relapse-free survival of statistically standardized continuous RT-PCR estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2): NCIC CTG MA.14. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 157:101-8. [PMID: 27116182 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3806-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2016] [Accepted: 04/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Recent ASCO/CAP guidelines focus on decision making associated with the presence/absence of continuous breast biomarkers. Statistical standardization (SS) is demonstrated as a method to evaluate the effects of continuous RT-PCR biomarker expression levels on breast cancer outcomes. MA.14 allocated 667 postmenopausal patients to tamoxifen based on locally determined ER/PR. Of 299 available patient tumor samples, 292 passed internal quality control. All tumors were centrally assessed by RT-PCR ER/PR/HER2 with each biomarker's z-scores categorized: ≥1.0 standard deviation (SD) below mean; <1.0 SD below mean; ≤1.0 SD above mean; >1.0 SD above mean. Log-rank statistics tested univariate differences in breast cancer relapse-free survival (RFS). Continuous SS-ER/PR/HER2 were assessed in multivariate Cox step-wise forward regression, adding a factor if p ≤ 0.05. Sensitivity analyses examined an external HER2+ cut-point of 1.32. Patients whose tumors were tested were representative of the MA.14 population (p values = 0.18-0.90). At 9.8 years median follow-up, SS-ER did not univariately impact RFS (p = 0.31). SS-PR values above the mean (z ≥ 0.0) had the best univariate RFS (p = 0.03). SS-HER2 also univariately impacted RFS (p = 0.004) with lowest (z-scores ≤ -1.0) and highest (z-scores > 1.0) having shortest RFS. Multivariate stratified/unstratified Cox models indicated patients with T1 tumors (p = 0.02/p = 0.0002) and higher SS-PR (p = 0.02/p = 0.01) had longer RFS; node-negative patients had better RFS (in unstratified analysis, p < 0.0001). Local ER/PR status did not impact RFS (p > 0.05). Patients with SS HER2+ ≥ 1.32 had worse RFS (univariate, p = 0.05; multivariate, p = 0.06). We demonstrated that higher SS-PR, and SS HER2 levels, measured by RT-PCR impacted breast cancer RFS outcomes. Evaluation in other trials may provide support for this methodology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith-Anne W Chapman
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group (Formerly, NCIC Clinical Trials Group), Queen's University, 10 Stuart St, Kingston, ON, Canada.
| | - Dennis C Sgroi
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paul E Goss
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Shemeica Binns
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yi Zhang
- bioTheranostics Inc, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Lei Han
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group (Formerly, NCIC Clinical Trials Group), Queen's University, 10 Stuart St, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | - Lois E Shepherd
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group (Formerly, NCIC Clinical Trials Group), Queen's University, 10 Stuart St, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Misra M, Sagar P, Friedmann AM, Ryan DP, Sgroi DC. CASE RECORDS of the MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL. Case 12-2016. An 8-Year-Old Boy with an Enlarging Mass in the Right Breast. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:1565-74. [PMID: 27096583 DOI: 10.1056/nejmcpc1503831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Madhusmita Misra
- From the Departments of Pediatrics (M.M., A.M.F.), Radiology (P.S.), Pediatric Surgery (D.P.R.), and Pathology (D.C.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Departments of Pediatrics (M.M., A.M.F.), Radiology (P.S.), Pediatric Surgery (D.P.R.), and Pathology (D.C.S.), Harvard Medical School - both in Boston
| | - Pallavi Sagar
- From the Departments of Pediatrics (M.M., A.M.F.), Radiology (P.S.), Pediatric Surgery (D.P.R.), and Pathology (D.C.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Departments of Pediatrics (M.M., A.M.F.), Radiology (P.S.), Pediatric Surgery (D.P.R.), and Pathology (D.C.S.), Harvard Medical School - both in Boston
| | - Alison M Friedmann
- From the Departments of Pediatrics (M.M., A.M.F.), Radiology (P.S.), Pediatric Surgery (D.P.R.), and Pathology (D.C.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Departments of Pediatrics (M.M., A.M.F.), Radiology (P.S.), Pediatric Surgery (D.P.R.), and Pathology (D.C.S.), Harvard Medical School - both in Boston
| | - Daniel P Ryan
- From the Departments of Pediatrics (M.M., A.M.F.), Radiology (P.S.), Pediatric Surgery (D.P.R.), and Pathology (D.C.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Departments of Pediatrics (M.M., A.M.F.), Radiology (P.S.), Pediatric Surgery (D.P.R.), and Pathology (D.C.S.), Harvard Medical School - both in Boston
| | - Dennis C Sgroi
- From the Departments of Pediatrics (M.M., A.M.F.), Radiology (P.S.), Pediatric Surgery (D.P.R.), and Pathology (D.C.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Departments of Pediatrics (M.M., A.M.F.), Radiology (P.S.), Pediatric Surgery (D.P.R.), and Pathology (D.C.S.), Harvard Medical School - both in Boston
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zhang Y, Sestak I, Schroeder BE, Dowsett M, Cuzick J, Schnabel CA, Sgroi DC. Abstract P5-08-03: Prognostic impact of the combined risk groups by breast cancer index and HOXB13/IL17BR ratio in hormonal receptor positive, node negative breast cancer: A TransATAC study. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p5-08-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Breast Cancer Index (BCI) is a gene expression-based assay that reports two distinct results: 1) BCI predictive based on HoxB13/IL17BR ratio (H/I), and 2) BCI prognostic based on an algorithm incorporating H/I with the Molecular Grade index (MGI). Both biomarkers have been validated independently in randomized trial cohorts. However, integrated results to better correlate recurrence risk with endocrine response have not been evaluated. The aim of this post-hoc analysis was to examine patient outcomes within BCI prognostic and predictive groups using the translational arm of the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination trial (TransATAC).
Methods: Primary tumor samples (N=742) from hormonal receptor-positive, N0 breast cancer patients treated with 5 years of tamoxifen (TAM) or anastrozole (ANA) in the ATAC trial were examined. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to examine the risk of distant recurrence (DR) in patient subgroups derived from BCI and H/I results. A separate series of clinical cases submitted for BCI testing (N=853) were analyzed to determine distribution of the combined BCI and H/I groups in clinical practice.
Results: Summary of patient distribution across the 6 BCI clinical subgroups showed that a large number of patients (331/742, 45%) were BCI low risk with low likelihood of benefit, whereas 108/742 (15%) of patients with endocrine responsive disease (High H/I) were classified as BCI low risk (Table 1). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that patients classified as BCI low risk had a very similar 10-year risk of DR irrespective of H/I status (H/I low: 5.5% vs. H/I high: 4.0%), indicating that prognosis was largely determined by BCI vs H/I.
Table 1: Distribution of BCI and H/I risk groups in TransATAC BCI: PrognosticH/I: PredictiveLow RiskIntermediate RiskHigh RiskTotalLow Likelihood3318717435 (59%)High Likelihood10895104307 (41%)Total439 (59%)182 (25%)121 (16%)742
In 853 node negative cases submitted for BCI clinical testing, the distribution of BCI and H/I risk groups were similar to that from the TransATAC cohort (Table 2).
Table 2: Distribution of BCI and H/I risk groups in clinical cases submitted for BCI testing BCI: PrognosticH/I: PredictiveLow RiskIntermediate RiskHigh RiskTotalLow Likelihood36410523492 (58%)High Likelihood96107158361 (42%)Total460 (54%)212 (25%)181 (21%)853
Discussion: Both prognostic and predictive components reported from the BCI assay may be used to stratify patients into 6 clinical subgroups based on prognostic risk of distant recurrence and endocrine responsiveness. Findings from this analysis indicate that patients classified as BCI low risk, regardless of H/I status, had sufficiently low DR rates and identifies patients that may be adequately treated with 5 years of endocrine therapy.
Citation Format: Zhang Y, Sestak I, Schroeder BE, Dowsett M, Cuzick J, Schnabel CA, Sgroi DC. Prognostic impact of the combined risk groups by breast cancer index and HOXB13/IL17BR ratio in hormonal receptor positive, node negative breast cancer: A TransATAC study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-08-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Zhang
- BioTheranostics, Inc., San Diego, CA; Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University London, London, United Kingdom; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - I Sestak
- BioTheranostics, Inc., San Diego, CA; Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University London, London, United Kingdom; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - BE Schroeder
- BioTheranostics, Inc., San Diego, CA; Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University London, London, United Kingdom; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - M Dowsett
- BioTheranostics, Inc., San Diego, CA; Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University London, London, United Kingdom; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - J Cuzick
- BioTheranostics, Inc., San Diego, CA; Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University London, London, United Kingdom; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - CA Schnabel
- BioTheranostics, Inc., San Diego, CA; Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University London, London, United Kingdom; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - DC Sgroi
- BioTheranostics, Inc., San Diego, CA; Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University London, London, United Kingdom; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sgroi DC, Chapman JAW, Badovinac-Crnjevic T, Zarella E, Binns S, Zhang Y, Schnabel CA, Erlander MG, Pritchard KI, Han L, Shepherd LE, Goss PE, Pollak M. Assessment of the prognostic and predictive utility of the Breast Cancer Index (BCI): an NCIC CTG MA.14 study. Breast Cancer Res 2016; 18:1. [PMID: 26728744 PMCID: PMC4700696 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-015-0660-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2015] [Accepted: 12/09/2015] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biomarkers that can be used to accurately assess the residual risk of disease recurrence in women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer are clinically valuable. We evaluated the prognostic value of the Breast Cancer Index (BCI), a continuous risk index based on a combination of HOXB13:IL17BR and molecular grade index, in women with early breast cancer treated with either tamoxifen alone or tamoxifen plus octreotide in the NCIC MA.14 phase III clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00002864; registered 1 November 1999). METHODS Gene expression analysis of BCI by real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed blinded to outcome on RNA extracted from archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples of 299 patients with both lymph node-negative (LN-) and lymph node-positive (LN+) disease enrolled in the MA.14 trial. Our primary objective was to determine the prognostic performance of BCI based on relapse-free survival (RFS). MA.14 patients experienced similar RFS on both treatment arms. Association of gene expression data with RFS was evaluated in univariate analysis with a stratified log-rank test statistic, depicted with a Kaplan-Meier plot and an adjusted Cox survivor plot. In the multivariate assessment, we used stratified Cox regression. The prognostic performance of an emerging, optimized linear BCI model was also assessed in a post hoc analysis. RESULTS Of 299 samples, 292 were assessed successfully for BCI for 146 patients accrued in each MA.14 treatment arm. BCI risk groups had a significant univariate association with RFS (stratified log-rank p = 0.005, unstratified log-rank p = 0.007). Adjusted 10-year RFS in BCI low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups was 87.5 %, 83.9 %, and 74.7 %, respectively. BCI had a significant prognostic effect [hazard ratio (HR) 2.34, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.33-4.11; p = 0.004], although not a predictive effect, on RFS in stratified multivariate analysis, adjusted for pathological tumor stage (HR 2.22, 95 % CI 1.22-4.07; p = 0.01). In the post hoc multivariate analysis, higher linear BCI was associated with shorter RFS (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS BCI had a strong prognostic effect on RFS in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with tamoxifen alone or with tamoxifen and octreotide. BCI was prognostic in both LN- and LN+ patients. This retrospective study is an independent validation of the prognostic performance of BCI in a prospective trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis C Sgroi
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Pathology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH East, Molecular Pathology, Research, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA. .,Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA. .,Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | | - T Badovinac-Crnjevic
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.
| | - Elizabeth Zarella
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Pathology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH East, Molecular Pathology, Research, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA. .,Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA. .,Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Shemeica Binns
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Pathology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH East, Molecular Pathology, Research, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA. .,Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA. .,Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Yi Zhang
- bioTheranostics, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
| | | | | | | | - Lei Han
- NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
| | - Lois E Shepherd
- NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
| | - Paul E Goss
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.
| | - Michael Pollak
- Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sestak I, Zhang Y, Schroeder BE, Goss PE, Dowsett M, Sgroi DC, Schnabel CA, Cuzick J. Abstract P4-11-19: Integration of breast cancer index (BCI) with clinicopathological factors for prediction of distant recurrence in ER+ breast cancer. Cancer Res 2015. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs14-p4-11-19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: BCI is a genomic signature that significantly predicts risk of both early (0-5 years) and late (5-10 years) distant recurrence (DR) in hormonal receptor-positive, lymph node negative (LN-) breast cancer. In LN- disease, tumor size (TS) and grade (TG) are important independent prognostic factors of breast cancer recurrence. In this analysis, the effect of integrating these traditional clinicopathological factors on the ability of BCI to predict distant recurrence was evaluated in the translational arm of the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination trial (TransATAC).
Methods: 709 primary tumor samples from hormonal receptor-positive, LN- patients treated with 5 years of tamoxifen or anastrozole were examined. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to fit 2 models: 1) BCI+TS; 2) BCI+TS+TG. To facilitate comparison across models, cut points were chosen based on the pre-specified 10 year DR rates of <10% (low), 10-20% (intermediate) and >20% (high). Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates of 10 year DR and hazard ratios (HR) were examined. Change in likelihood ratio χ2 (LR-χ2) values were used to quantitate relative prognostic information beyond standard clinicopathological variables (CTS, Clinical Treatment Score).
Results: In the univariate analysis, all models were significantly prognostic for 10 year DR risk; BCI was somewhat less predictive vs BCI+TS, whereas TG did not provide significant additional value beyond BCI+TS [HR (95% CI): 3.26 (2.29-4.63), 2.72 (2.11-3.50), 2.72 (2.11-3.50); LR-χ2 (p value): 45.54 (p<0.0001), 54.71 (p<0.0001), 57.27 (p<0.0001) for BCI, BCI+TS, BCI+TS+TG, respectively]. Adjusted HRs beyond CTS demonstrated highly significant and comparable prognostic ability [HR (95% CI): 2.35 (1.61-3.42), 2.06 (1.48-2.86); LR-χ2 (p value): 20.75 (p<0.0001), 18.96 (p<0.0001)] for BCI and BCI+TS, respectively. BCI and BCI+TS categorized similar proportions of patients into respective risk groups, and KM analysis comparing BCI vs BCI+TS risk categories showed similar rates of 10 year DR (Table 1).
Comparison of Risk Categorization and 10 year DRBCIBCI+TS% Patients10 year DR% Patients10 year DRLow Risk53.7%5.3%54.7%5.2%Intermediate Risk29.3%15.5%29.2%16.5%High Risk17.0%28.0%16.2%27.3%
In cross stratification analysis between BCI and BCI+TS, no significant re-classification was observed (Table 2), however 14.5% of BCI and 9.7% of BCI+TS intermediate risk patients were re-stratified as low risk.
Re-classification of BCI and BCI+TS for all patientsBCIBCI+TSLowIntermediateHighTotalLow358300388 (54.7%)Intermediate2016323206 (29.1%)High31498115 (16.2%)Total381 (53.7%)207 (29.2%)121 (17.1%)709
Discussion: Integration of tumor size, but not grade, statistically enhanced the prognostic ability of BCI to predict 10 year DR risk in patients with ER+, LN- early stage breast cancer. However, there was limited clinical impact on risk stratification, indicating that the prognostic information provided by these clinicopathological factors is effectively captured by BCI alone.
Citation Format: Ivana Sestak, Yi Zhang, Brock E Schroeder, Paul E Goss, Mitch Dowsett, Dennis C Sgroi, Catherine A Schnabel, Jack Cuzick. Integration of breast cancer index (BCI) with clinicopathological factors for prediction of distant recurrence in ER+ breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivana Sestak
- 1Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jack Cuzick
- 1Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rudd ML, Mohamed H, Price JC, O'Hara AJ, Le Gallo M, Urick ME, Cruz P, Zhang S, Hansen NF, Godwin AK, Sgroi DC, Wolfsberg TG, Mullikin JC, Merino MJ, Bell DW. Mutational analysis of the tyrosine kinome in serous and clear cell endometrial cancer uncovers rare somatic mutations in TNK2 and DDR1. BMC Cancer 2014; 14:884. [PMID: 25427824 PMCID: PMC4258955 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2014] [Accepted: 11/13/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endometrial cancer (EC) is the 8th leading cause of cancer death amongst American women. Most ECs are endometrioid, serous, or clear cell carcinomas, or an admixture of histologies. Serous and clear ECs are clinically aggressive tumors for which alternative therapeutic approaches are needed. The purpose of this study was to search for somatic mutations in the tyrosine kinome of serous and clear cell ECs, because mutated kinases can point to potential therapeutic targets. METHODS In a mutation discovery screen, we PCR amplified and Sanger sequenced the exons encoding the catalytic domains of 86 tyrosine kinases from 24 serous, 11 clear cell, and 5 mixed histology ECs. For somatically mutated genes, we next sequenced the remaining coding exons from the 40 discovery screen tumors and sequenced all coding exons from another 72 ECs (10 clear cell, 21 serous, 41 endometrioid). We assessed the copy number of mutated kinases in this cohort of 112 tumors using quantitative real time PCR, and we used immunoblotting to measure expression of these kinases in endometrial cancer cell lines. RESULTS Overall, we identified somatic mutations in TNK2 (tyrosine kinase non-receptor, 2) and DDR1 (discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinase 1) in 5.3% (6 of 112) and 2.7% (3 of 112) of ECs. Copy number gains of TNK2 and DDR1 were identified in another 4.5% and 0.9% of 112 cases respectively. Immunoblotting confirmed TNK2 and DDR1 expression in endometrial cancer cell lines. Three of five missense mutations in TNK2 and one of two missense mutations in DDR1 are predicted to impact protein function by two or more in silico algorithms. The TNK2(P761Rfs*72) frameshift mutation was recurrent in EC, and the DDR1(R570Q) missense mutation was recurrent across tumor types. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to systematically search for mutations in the tyrosine kinome in clear cell endometrial tumors. Our findings indicate that high-frequency somatic mutations in the catalytic domains of the tyrosine kinome are rare in clear cell ECs. We uncovered ten new mutations in TNK2 and DDR1 within serous and endometrioid ECs, thus providing novel insights into the mutation spectrum of each gene in EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Daphne W Bell
- Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda MD 20892, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Karlsson E, Pérez-Tenorio G, Amin R, Bostner J, Skoog L, Fornander T, Sgroi DC, Nordenskjöld B, Hallbeck AL, Stål O. The mTOR effectors 4EBP1 and S6K2 are frequently coexpressed, and associated with a poor prognosis and endocrine resistance in breast cancer: a retrospective study including patients from the randomised Stockholm tamoxifen trials. Breast Cancer Res 2014; 15:R96. [PMID: 24131622 PMCID: PMC3978839 DOI: 10.1186/bcr3557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2013] [Accepted: 09/25/2013] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction mTOR and its downstream effectors the 4E-binding protein 1 (4EBP1) and the p70 ribosomal S6 kinases (S6K1 and S6K2) are frequently upregulated in breast cancer, and assumed to be driving forces in tumourigenesis, in close connection with oestrogen receptor (ER) networks. Here, we investigated these factors as clinical markers in five different cohorts of breast cancer patients. Methods The prognostic significance of 4EBP1, S6K1 and S6K2 mRNA expression was assessed with real-time PCR in 93 tumours from the treatment randomised Stockholm trials, encompassing postmenopausal patients enrolled between 1976 and 1990. Three publicly available breast cancer cohorts were used to confirm the results. Furthermore, the predictive values of 4EBP1 and p4EBP1_S65 protein expression for both prognosis and endocrine treatment benefit were assessed by immunohistochemical analysis of 912 node-negative breast cancers from the Stockholm trials. Results S6K2 and 4EBP1 mRNA expression levels showed significant correlation and were associated with a poor outcome in all cohorts investigated. 4EBP1 protein was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor, especially in progesterone receptor (PgR)-expressing cancers. 4EBP1 protein expression was also associated with a poor response to endocrine treatment in the ER/PgR positive group. Cross-talk to genomic as well as non-genomic ER/PgR signalling may be involved and the results further support a combination of ER and mTOR signalling targeted therapies. Conclusion This study suggests S6K2 and 4EBP1 as important factors for breast tumourigenesis, interplaying with hormone receptor signalling. We propose S6K2 and 4EBP1 as new potential clinical markers for prognosis and endocrine therapy response in breast cancer.
Collapse
|
28
|
Aguilar H, Urruticoechea A, Halonen P, Kiyotani K, Mushiroda T, Barril X, Serra-Musach J, Islam A, Caizzi L, Di Croce L, Nevedomskaya E, Zwart W, Bostner J, Karlsson E, Pérez Tenorio G, Fornander T, Sgroi DC, Garcia-Mata R, Jansen MPHM, García N, Bonifaci N, Climent F, Soler MT, Rodríguez-Vida A, Gil M, Brunet J, Martrat G, Gómez-Baldó L, Extremera AI, Figueras A, Balart J, Clarke R, Burnstein KL, Carlson KE, Katzenellenbogen JA, Vizoso M, Esteller M, Villanueva A, Rodríguez-Peña AB, Bustelo XR, Nakamura Y, Zembutsu H, Stål O, Beijersbergen RL, Pujana MA. VAV3 mediates resistance to breast cancer endocrine therapy. Breast Cancer Res 2014; 16:R53. [PMID: 24886537 PMCID: PMC4076632 DOI: 10.1186/bcr3664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2013] [Accepted: 05/16/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Endocrine therapies targeting cell proliferation and survival mediated by estrogen receptor α (ERα) are among the most effective systemic treatments for ERα-positive breast cancer. However, most tumors initially responsive to these therapies acquire resistance through mechanisms that involve ERα transcriptional regulatory plasticity. Herein we identify VAV3 as a critical component in this process. Methods A cell-based chemical compound screen was carried out to identify therapeutic strategies against resistance to endocrine therapy. Binding to ERα was evaluated by molecular docking analyses, an agonist fluoligand assay and short hairpin (sh)RNA–mediated protein depletion. Microarray analyses were performed to identify altered gene expression. Western blot analysis of signaling and proliferation markers, and shRNA-mediated protein depletion in viability and clonogenic assays, were performed to delineate the role of VAV3. Genetic variation in VAV3 was assessed for association with the response to tamoxifen. Immunohistochemical analyses of VAV3 were carried out to determine its association with therapeutic response and different tumor markers. An analysis of gene expression association with drug sensitivity was carried out to identify a potential therapeutic approach based on differential VAV3 expression. Results The compound YC-1 was found to comparatively reduce the viability of cell models of acquired resistance. This effect was probably not due to activation of its canonical target (soluble guanylyl cyclase), but instead was likely a result of binding to ERα. VAV3 was selectively reduced upon exposure to YC-1 or ERα depletion, and, accordingly, VAV3 depletion comparatively reduced the viability of cell models of acquired resistance. In the clinical scenario, germline variation in VAV3 was associated with the response to tamoxifen in Japanese breast cancer patients (rs10494071 combined P value = 8.4 × 10−4). The allele association combined with gene expression analyses indicated that low VAV3 expression predicts better clinical outcome. Conversely, high nuclear VAV3 expression in tumor cells was associated with poorer endocrine therapy response. Based on VAV3 expression levels and the response to erlotinib in cancer cell lines, targeting EGFR signaling may be a promising therapeutic strategy. Conclusions This study proposes VAV3 as a biomarker and a rationale for its use as a signaling target to prevent and/or overcome resistance to endocrine therapy in breast cancer.
Collapse
|
29
|
Sjöström M, Hartman L, Grabau D, Fornander T, Malmström P, Nordenskjöld B, Sgroi DC, Skoog L, Stål O, Leeb-Lundberg LMF, Fernö M. Lack of G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) in the plasma membrane is associated with excellent long-term prognosis in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014; 145:61-71. [PMID: 24715381 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-2936-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2014] [Accepted: 03/22/2014] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER), or GPR30, is a membrane receptor reported to mediate non-genomic estrogen responses. Tamoxifen is a partial agonist at GPER in vitro. Here, we investigated if GPER expression is prognostic in primary breast cancer, if the receptor is treatment-predictive for adjuvant tamoxifen, and if receptor subcellular localization has any impact on the prognostic value. Total and plasma membrane (PM) GPER expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in breast tumors from 742 postmenopausal lymph node-negative patients subsequently randomized for tamoxifen treatment for 2-5 years versus no systemic treatment, regardless of estrogen receptor (ER) status, and with a median follow-up of 17 years for patients free of event. PM GPER expression was a strong independent prognostic factor for poor prognosis in breast cancer without treatment-predictive information for tamoxifen. In the tamoxifen-treated ER-positive and progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive patient subgroup, the absence of PM GPER (53 % of all ER-positive tumors) predicted 91 % 20-year distant disease-free survival, compared to 73 % in the presence of GPER (p = 0.001). Total GPER expression showed positive correlations with ER and PgR and negative correlation with histological grade, but the correlations were biphasic. On the other hand, PM GPER expression showed strong negative correlations with ER and PgR, and strong positive correlation with HER2 overexpression and high histological grade. GPER overexpression and PM localization are critical events in breast cancer progression, and lack of GPER in the PM is associated with excellent long-term prognosis in ER-positive and PgR-positive tamoxifen-treated primary breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Sjöström
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
McMullin RP, Wittner BS, Yang C, Denton-Schneider BR, Hicks D, Singavarapu R, Moulis S, Lee J, Akbari MR, Narod SA, Aldape KD, Steeg PS, Ramaswamy S, Sgroi DC. A BRCA1 deficient-like signature is enriched in breast cancer brain metastases and predicts DNA damage-induced poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor sensitivity. Breast Cancer Res 2014; 16:R25. [PMID: 24625110 PMCID: PMC4053087 DOI: 10.1186/bcr3625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2013] [Accepted: 02/26/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is an unmet clinical need for biomarkers to identify breast cancer patients at an increased risk of developing brain metastases. The objective is to identify gene signatures and biological pathways associated with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) brain metastasis. METHODS We combined laser capture microdissection and gene expression microarrays to analyze malignant epithelium from HER2+ breast cancer brain metastases with that from HER2+ nonmetastatic primary tumors. Differential gene expression was performed including gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) using publicly available breast cancer gene expression data sets. RESULTS In a cohort of HER2+ breast cancer brain metastases, we identified a gene expression signature that anti-correlates with overexpression of BRCA1. Sequence analysis of the HER2+ brain metastases revealed no pathogenic mutations of BRCA1, and therefore the aforementioned signature was designated BRCA1 Deficient-Like (BD-L). Evaluation of an independent cohort of breast cancer metastases demonstrated that BD-L values are significantly higher in brain metastases as compared to other metastatic sites. Although the BD-L signature is present in all subtypes of breast cancer, it is significantly higher in BRCA1 mutant primary tumors as compared with sporadic breast tumors. Additionally, BD-L signature values are significantly higher in HER2-/ER- primary tumors as compared with HER2+/ER + and HER2-/ER + tumors. The BD-L signature correlates with breast cancer cell line pharmacologic response to a combination of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor and temozolomide, and the signature outperformed four published gene signatures of BRCA1/2 deficiency. CONCLUSIONS A BD-L signature is enriched in HER2+ breast cancer brain metastases without pathogenic BRCA1 mutations. Unexpectedly, elevated BD-L values are found in a subset of primary tumors across all breast cancer subtypes. Evaluation of pharmacological sensitivity in breast cancer cell lines representing all breast cancer subtypes suggests the BD-L signature may serve as a biomarker to identify sporadic breast cancer patients who might benefit from a therapeutic combination of PARP inhibitor and temozolomide and may be indicative of a dysfunctional BRCA1-associated pathway.
Collapse
|
31
|
Sgroi DC, Sestak I, Cuzick J, Zhang Y, Schnabel CA, Schroeder B, Erlander MG, Dunbier A, Sidhu K, Lopez-Knowles E, Goss PE, Dowsett M. Prediction of late distant recurrence in patients with oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer: a prospective comparison of the breast-cancer index (BCI) assay, 21-gene recurrence score, and IHC4 in the TransATAC study population. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14:1067-1076. [PMID: 24035531 PMCID: PMC3918681 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70387-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 223] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biomarkers to improve the risk-benefit of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy for late recurrence in patients with oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer would be clinically valuable. We compared the prognostic ability of the breast-cancer index (BCI) assay, 21-gene recurrence score (Oncotype DX), and an immunohistochemical prognostic model (IHC4) for both early and late recurrence in patients with oestrogen-receptor-positive, node-negative (N0) disease who took part in the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) clinical trial. METHODS In this prospective comparison study, we obtained archival tumour blocks from the TransATAC tissue bank from all postmenopausal patients with oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer from whom the 21-gene recurrence score and IHC4 values had already been derived. We did BCI analysis in matched samples with sufficient residual RNA using two BCI models-cubic (BCI-C) and linear (BCI-L)-using previously validated cutoffs. We assessed prognostic ability of BCI for distant recurrence over 10 years (the primary endpoint) and compared it with that of the 21-gene recurrence score and IHC4. We also tested the ability of the assays to predict early (0-5 years) and late (5-10 years) distant recurrence. To assess the ability of the biomarkers to predict recurrence beyond standard clinicopathological variables, we calculated the change in the likelihood-ratio χ(2) (LR-Δχ(2)) from Cox proportional hazards models. FINDINGS Suitable tissue was available from 665 patients with oestrogen-receptor-positive, N0 breast cancer for BCI analysis. The primary analysis showed significant differences in risk of distant recurrence over 10 years in the categorical BCI-C risk groups (p<0·0001) with 6·8% (95% CI 4·4-10·0) of patients in the low-risk group, 17·3% (12·0-24·7) in the intermediate group, and 22·2% (15·3-31·5) in the high-risk group having distant recurrence. The secondary analysis showed that BCI-L was a much stronger predictor for overall (0-10 year) distant recurrence compared with BCI-C (interquartile HR 2·30 [95% CI 1·62-3·27]; LR-Δχ(2)=22·69; p<0·0001). When compared with BCI-L, the 21-gene recurrence score was less predictive (HR 1·48 [95% CI 1·22-1·78]; LR-Δχ(2)=13·68; p=0·0002) and IHC4 was similar (HR 1·69 [95% CI 1·51-2·56]; LR-Δχ(2)=22·83; p<0·0001). All further analyses were done with the BCI-L model. In a multivariable analysis, all assays had significant prognostic ability for early distant recurrence (BCI-L HR 2·77 [95% CI 1·63-4·70], LR-Δχ(2)=15·42, p<0·0001; 21-gene recurrence score HR 1·80 [1·42-2·29], LR-Δχ(2)=18·48, p<0·0001; IHC4 HR 2·90 [2·01-4·18], LR-Δχ(2)=29·14, p<0·0001); however, only BCI-L was significant for late distant recurrence (BCI-L HR 1·95 [95% CI 1·22-3·14], LR-Δχ(2)=7·97, p=0·0048; 21-gene recurrence score HR 1·13 [0·82-1·56], LR-Δχ(2)=0·48, p=0·47; IHC4 HR 1·30 [0·88-1·94], LR-Δχ(2)=1·59, p=0·20). INTERPRETATION BCI-L was the only significant prognostic test for risk of both early and late distant recurrence and identified two risk populations for each timeframe. It could help to identify patients at high risk for late distant recurrence who might benefit from extended endocrine or other therapy. FUNDING Avon Foundation, National Institutes of Health, Breast Cancer Foundation, US Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program, Susan G Komen for the Cure, Breakthrough Breast Cancer through the Mary-Jean Mitchell Green Foundation, AstraZeneca, Cancer Research UK, and the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at the Royal Marsden (London, UK).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis C Sgroi
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Ivana Sestak
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University, London, UK
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University, London, UK
| | - Yi Zhang
- bioTheranostics, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Anita Dunbier
- Breakthrough Breast Cancer Centre, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Kally Sidhu
- Breakthrough Breast Cancer Centre, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Paul E Goss
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mitch Dowsett
- Breakthrough Breast Cancer Centre, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Research and Academic Department of Biochemistry, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Zhang Y, Schroeder BE, Jerevall PL, Stal O, Sgroi DC, Erlander MG, Schnabel CA. Abstract B031: Prediction of the clinical benefit of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy using Breast Cancer Index (HOXB13:IL17BR). Mol Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/1557-3125.advbc-b031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Breast Cancer Index (BCI) is a gene expression-based biomarker with a novel mechanism of action that provides individual risk assessment of both early (0-5 years) and late (5-10 years) distant recurrence in ER+, node negative (LN-) breast cancer patients. BCI is an algorithmic combination of two complementary biomarkers: Molecular Grade Index (MGI), which recapitulates tumor grade/proliferation status; and HOXB13:IL17BR ratio (H/I), which interrogates estrogen signaling pathways. In a previous analysis of the randomized MA.17 trial, H/I was predictive of extended endocrine therapy benefit (Sgroi et al., JNCI 2013). The current study examined whether H/I predicts benefit of adjuvant tamoxifen (TAM) versus untreated (UNT) in ER+ LN- patients from the prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled Stockholm trial.
Materials and Methods: Formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumor blocks from 808 LN- patients were analyzed with 37 cases excluded due to insufficient tumor content (N=771). The primary endpoint was distant recurrence, with 15-year clinical follow-up data. H/I was calculated and risk groups determined using a pre-specified cutpoint. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression with an interaction term between the treatments and pre-defined H/I risk groups were examined for prediction of benefit of TAM vs UNT. The strength of the relationship between magnitude of TAM benefit and H/I as a continuous variable was assessed by the likelihood ratio test.
Results: Of 771 specimens assayed, RT-PCR was successful for 769 cases, among which 600 were from ER+ tumors (317 TAM, 283 untreated). Using the pre-specified cutpoint, 230 patients (38%) were classified as having high H/I ratio while 370 (62%) had a low H/I ratio. High H/I was predictive for benefit from TAM therapy, with a decrease of 17.4% in absolute risk of distant recurrence (90.6% [95% CI: 85.1-96.3%] for the TAM arm versus 73.1% [95% CI: 65.0-82.2%] for UNT arm) and a relative risk of 0.33 (95% CI: 0.17-0.63; p < 0.0001) as measured by hazard ratio (HR). No significant reduction in distant recurrence was observed in patients with low H/I [91.6% (95% CI: 87.7-95.6%) for the TAM arm versus 88.2% (95% CI: 83.3-93.5%) for the untreated arm] and a HR of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.35-1.28; p = 0.204). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the benefit of TAM was significant in patients with high H/I (HR 0.33; 95% CI 0.17-0.62; p = 0.0007) after adjusting for age, tumor size, grade, PR and HER2 status. A multivariate analysis of Cox models with and without an interaction term between H/I and TAM treatment by likelihood ratio test showed that the interaction was significant (p = 0.003). Consistent with the significant interaction, the 10-year rate of distant recurrence as a function of continuous H/I for the 2 treatment arms demonstrated that the reduction in the rate of distant recurrence by TAM increases as the H/I ratio increases.
Conclusions: This prospective-retrospective study of ER+ LN- breast cancer patients from the Stockholm trial demonstrated that H/I was predictive of benefit from adjuvant TAM treatment. The results from this study and the recent data demonstrating that H/I predicts benefit from extended letrozole therapy in the MA.17 trial, indicates that H/I is a predictive biomarker for both adjuvant and extended adjuvant endocrine therapies and further supports the clinical utility of BCI (H/I) for predicting patient benefit of extended endocrine therapy.
Citation Format: Yi Zhang, Brock E. Schroeder, Piiha-Lotta Jerevall, Olle Stal, Dennis C. Sgroi, Mark G. Erlander, Catherine A. Schnabel. Prediction of the clinical benefit of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy using Breast Cancer Index (HOXB13:IL17BR). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Breast Cancer Research: Genetics, Biology, and Clinical Applications; Oct 3-6, 2013; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2013;11(10 Suppl):Abstract nr B031.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Zhang
- 1bioTheranostics, Inc., San Diego, CA,
| | | | | | - Olle Stal
- 3Linkoping University, Linkoping, Sweden
| | - Dennis C. Sgroi
- 2Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Pathology, Boston, MA,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Sgroi DC, Carney E, Zarrella E, Steffel L, Binns SN, Finkelstein DM, Szymonifka J, Bhan AK, Shepherd LE, Zhang Y, Schnabel CA, Erlander MG, Ingle JN, Porter P, Muss HB, Pritchard KI, Tu D, Rimm DL, Goss PE. Prediction of late disease recurrence and extended adjuvant letrozole benefit by the HOXB13/IL17BR biomarker. J Natl Cancer Inst 2013; 105:1036-42. [PMID: 23812955 PMCID: PMC3888138 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djt146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 141] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Biomarkers to optimize extended adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer are limited. The HOXB13/IL17BR (H/I) biomarker predicts recurrence risk in ER-positive, lymph node–negative breast cancer patients. H/I was evaluated in MA.17 trial for prognostic performance for late recurrence and treatment benefit from extended adjuvant letrozole. Methods A prospective–retrospective, nested case-control design of 83 recurrences matched to 166 nonrecurrences from letrozole- and placebo-treated patients within MA.17 was conducted. Expression of H/I within primary tumors was determined by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction with a prespecified cutpoint. The predictive ability of H/I for ascertaining benefit from letrozole was determined using multivariable conditional logistic regression including standard clinicopathological factors as covariates. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results High H/I was statistically significantly associated with a decrease in late recurrence in patients receiving extended letrozole therapy (odds ratio [OR] = 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.16 to 0.75; P = .007). In an adjusted model with standard clinicopathological factors, high H/I remained statistically significantly associated with patient benefit from letrozole (OR = 0.33; 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.73; P = .006). Reduction in the absolute risk of recurrence at 5 years was 16.5% for patients with high H/I (P = .007). The interaction between H/I and letrozole treatment was statistically significant (P = .03). Conclusions In the absence of extended letrozole therapy, high H/I identifies a subgroup of ER-positive patients disease-free after 5 years of tamoxifen who are at risk for late recurrence. When extended endocrine therapy with letrozole is prescribed, high H/I predicts benefit from therapy and a decreased probability of late disease recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis C Sgroi
- Department of Pathology, Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Price JC, Pollock LM, Rudd ML, Fogoros SK, Mohamed H, Hanigan CL, Le Gallo M, Program NIHISC(NISCCS, Zhang S, Cruz P, Cherukuri PF, Hansen NF, McManus KJ, Godwin AK, Sgroi DC, Mullikin JC, Merino MJ, Hieter P, Bell DW. Sequencing of candidate chromosome instability genes in endometrial cancers reveals somatic mutations in ESCO1, CHTF18, and MRE11A. PLoS One 2013; 8:e63313. [PMID: 23755103 PMCID: PMC3670891 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2012] [Accepted: 04/01/2013] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Most endometrial cancers can be classified histologically as endometrioid, serous, or clear cell. Non-endometrioid endometrial cancers (NEECs; serous and clear cell) are the most clinically aggressive of the three major histotypes and are characterized by aneuploidy, a feature of chromosome instability. The genetic alterations that underlie chromosome instability in endometrial cancer are poorly understood. In the present study, we used Sanger sequencing to search for nucleotide variants in the coding exons and splice junctions of 21 candidate chromosome instability genes, including 19 genes implicated in sister chromatid cohesion, from 24 primary, microsatellite-stable NEECs. Somatic mutations were verified by sequencing matched normal DNAs. We subsequently resequenced mutated genes from 41 additional NEECs as well as 42 endometrioid ECs (EECs). We uncovered nonsynonymous somatic mutations in ESCO1, CHTF18, and MRE11A in, respectively, 3.7% (4 of 107), 1.9% (2 of 107), and 1.9% (2 of 107) of endometrial tumors. Overall, 7.7% (5 of 65) of NEECs and 2.4% (1 of 42) of EECs had somatically mutated one or more of the three genes. A subset of mutations are predicted to impact protein function. The co-occurrence of somatic mutations in ESCO1 and CHTF18 was statistically significant (P = 0.0011, two-tailed Fisher's exact test). This is the first report of somatic mutations within ESCO1 and CHTF18 in endometrial tumors and of MRE11A mutations in microsatellite-stable endometrial tumors. Our findings warrant future studies to determine whether these mutations are driver events that contribute to the pathogenesis of endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica C. Price
- Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Lana M. Pollock
- Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Meghan L. Rudd
- Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Sarah K. Fogoros
- Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Hassan Mohamed
- Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Christin L. Hanigan
- Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Matthieu Le Gallo
- Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | | | - Suiyuan Zhang
- Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Pedro Cruz
- Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Praveen F. Cherukuri
- Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Nancy F. Hansen
- Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Kirk J. McManus
- Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Manitoba Institute of Cell Biology, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Andrew K. Godwin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America
- The University of Kansas Cancer Center, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America
| | - Dennis C. Sgroi
- Molecular Pathology Unit and Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - James C. Mullikin
- Intramural Sequencing Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
- Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Maria J. Merino
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Philip Hieter
- Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Daphne W. Bell
- Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Weiner M, Skoog L, Fornander T, Nordenskjöld B, Sgroi DC, Stål O. Oestrogen receptor co-activator AIB1 is a marker of tamoxifen benefit in postmenopausal breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2013; 24:1994-9. [PMID: 23670096 PMCID: PMC3718507 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The oestrogen receptor (ER) co-activator amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1) has been suggested as a treatment predictive and prognostic marker in breast cancer. Studies have however not been unanimous. Patients and methods AIB1 protein expression was analysed by immunohistochemistry on tissue micro-arrays with tumour samples from 910 postmenopausal women randomised to tamoxifen treatment or no adjuvant treatment. Associations between AIB1 expression, clinical outcome in the two arms and other clinicopathological variables were examined. Results In patients with ER-positive breast cancer expressing low tumour levels of AIB1 (<75%), we found no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS) or breast cancer-specific survival (BCS) between tamoxifen treated and untreated patients. In patients with high AIB1 expression (>75%), there was a significant decrease in recurrence rate (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.26–0.61, P < 0.001) and breast cancer mortality rate (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.21–0.69, P = 0.0015) with tamoxifen treatment. In the untreated arm, we found high expression of AIB1 to be significantly associated with lower RFS (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.20–2.53, P = 0.0038). Conclusion Our results suggest that high AIB1 is a predictive marker of good response to tamoxifen treatment in postmenopausal women and a prognostic marker of decreased RFS in systemically untreated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Weiner
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, County Council of Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Habel LA, Sakoda LC, Achacoso N, Ma XJ, Erlander MG, Sgroi DC, Fehrenbacher L, Greenberg D, Quesenberry CP. HOXB13:IL17BR and molecular grade index and risk of breast cancer death among patients with lymph node-negative invasive disease. Breast Cancer Res 2013; 15:R24. [PMID: 23497539 PMCID: PMC3672697 DOI: 10.1186/bcr3402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2012] [Accepted: 02/04/2013] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Studies have shown that a two-gene ratio (HOXB13:IL17BR) and a five-gene (BUB1B, CENPA, NEK2, RACGAP1, RRM2) molecular grade index (MGI) are predictive of clinical outcomes among early-stage breast cancer patients. In an independent population of lymph node-negative breast cancer patients from a community hospital setting, we evaluated the performance of two risk classifiers that have been derived from these gene signatures combined, MGI+HOXB13:IL17BR and the Breast Cancer Index (BCI). Methods A case-control study was conducted among 4,964 Kaiser Permanente patients diagnosed with node-negative invasive breast cancer from 1985 to 1994 who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. For 191 cases (breast cancer deaths) and 417 matched controls, archived tumor tissues were available and analyzed for expression levels of the seven genes of interest and four normalization genes by RT-PCR. Logistic regression methods were used to estimate the relative risk (RR) and 10-year absolute risk of breast cancer death associated with prespecified risk categories for MGI+HOXB13:IL17BR and BCI. Results Both MGI+HOXB13:IL17BR and BCI classified over half of all ER-positive patients as low risk. The 10-year absolute risks of breast cancer death for ER-positive, tamoxifen-treated patients classified in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were 3.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9% to 5.4%), 5.9% (95% CI 3.0% to 8.6%), and 12.9% (95% CI 7.9% to 17.6%) by MGI+HOXB13:IL17BR and 3.5% (95% CI 1.9% to 5.1%), 7.0% (95% CI 3.8% to 10.1%), and 12.9% (95% CI 7.1% to 18.3%) by BCI. Those for ER-positive, tamoxifen-untreated patients were 5.7% (95% CI 4.0% to 7.4%), 13.8% (95% CI 8.4% to 18.9%), and 15.2% (95% CI 9.4% to 20.5%) by MGI+HOXB13:IL17BR and 5.1% (95% CI 3.6% to 6.6%), 18.6% (95% CI 10.8% to 25.7%), and 17.5% (95% CI 11.1% to 23.5%) by BCI. After adjusting for tumor size and grade, the RRs of breast cancer death comparing high- versus low-risk categories of both classifiers remained elevated but were attenuated for tamoxifen-treated and tamoxifen-untreated patients. Conclusion Among ER-positive, lymph node-negative patients not treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, MGI+HOXB13:IL17BR and BCI were associated with risk of breast cancer death. Both risk classifiers appeared to provide risk information beyond standard prognostic factors.
Collapse
|
37
|
Sgroi DC, Sestak I, Zhang Y, Erlander MG, Schnabel CA, Goss PE, Cuzick J, Dowsett M. Abstract P2-10-15: Evaluation of Prognostic and Predictive Performance of Breast Cancer Index and Its Components in Hormonal Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Patients: A TransATAC Study. Cancer Res 2012. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs12-p2-10-15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial compared the efficacy and safety of 5 years of anastrozole with tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for postmenopausal women with localized HR+ breast cancer. At a median follow-up of 10 years, a statistically significant improvement with anastrozole vs. tamoxifen for disease-free survival, time to recurrence and time to distant recurrence was observed. The HOXB13:IL17BR gene expression ratio (H/I) quantifies recurrence risk in ER positive (ER+) breast cancer patients and is predictive of benefit from endocrine therapy. Molecular Grade Index (MGI) is a five-gene index that provides quantitative and objective molecular assessment of tumor grade and proliferative status. Breast Cancer Index (BCI) combines H/I and MGI into a continuous risk model that provides a likelihood of distant recurrence in patients treated with endocrine therapy, and efficacy from neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In the current analysis, evaluation of the prognostic and predictive performance of BCI, H/I and MGI in the ATAC study cohort was conducted.
Methods: Under the TransATAC protocol, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks of primary tumor were collected from HR+ patients from each monotherapy arm. The current study examined samples collected from the United Kingdom, which constituted 79% of the collection. RNA extracted from 1102 samples from the TransATAC study was amplified, converted to cDNA and subjected to RT-PCR with primers and probes to HOXB13, IL17BR, BUB1A, CENPA, NEK2, RACGAP1 and RRM2. H/I, MGI and BCI were calculated and risk groups were determined using pre-specified cutpoints.
Results: Of 1102 tumor specimens assayed, 29 failed QC criteria, leaving 1073 samples for analysis. Detailed results on the prognostic and predictive performance of BCI, H/I and MGI will be presented. Data on whether BCI and its components provided independent prognostic information in the presence of classical variables, their prognostic value for risk of late recurrence, interaction by treatment arms, and comparative performance vs other models will also be discussed.
Discussion: The ATAC trial has established the long-term efficacy and safety of anastrozole over tamoxifen as initial adjuvant treatment for post-menopausal early stage breast cancer patients. Continued efforts are needed to improve on quantification of residual risk in patients who were treated with endocrine therapy to guide decision-making in selecting additional adjuvant chemotherapy and/or administering extended endocrine treatment. This study will help to establish the strategy to more effectively select patients for adjuvant therapies.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-10-15.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- DC Sgroi
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Queen Mary University, London, United Kingdom; bioTheranostics Inc, San Diego, CA; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - I Sestak
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Queen Mary University, London, United Kingdom; bioTheranostics Inc, San Diego, CA; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Y Zhang
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Queen Mary University, London, United Kingdom; bioTheranostics Inc, San Diego, CA; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - MG Erlander
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Queen Mary University, London, United Kingdom; bioTheranostics Inc, San Diego, CA; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - CA Schnabel
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Queen Mary University, London, United Kingdom; bioTheranostics Inc, San Diego, CA; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - PE Goss
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Queen Mary University, London, United Kingdom; bioTheranostics Inc, San Diego, CA; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - J Cuzick
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Queen Mary University, London, United Kingdom; bioTheranostics Inc, San Diego, CA; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - M Dowsett
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Queen Mary University, London, United Kingdom; bioTheranostics Inc, San Diego, CA; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Le Gallo M, O'Hara AJ, Rudd ML, Urick ME, Hansen NF, O'Neil NJ, Price JC, Zhang S, England BM, Godwin AK, Sgroi DC, Hieter P, Mullikin JC, Merino MJ, Bell DW. Exome sequencing of serous endometrial tumors identifies recurrent somatic mutations in chromatin-remodeling and ubiquitin ligase complex genes. Nat Genet 2012; 44:1310-5. [PMID: 23104009 PMCID: PMC3515204 DOI: 10.1038/ng.2455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 318] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2012] [Accepted: 10/04/2012] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is the 6th most commonly diagnosed cancer among women worldwide, causing ~74,000 deaths annually 1. Serous endometrial cancers are a clinically aggressive subtype with a poorly defined genetic etiology 2-4. We used whole exome sequencing (WES) to comprehensively search for somatic mutations within ~22,000 protein-encoding genes among 13 primary serous endometrial tumors. We subsequently resequenced 18 genes that were mutated in more than one tumor, and/or were genes that formed an enriched functional grouping, from 40 additional serous tumors. We identified high frequencies of somatic mutations in CHD4 (17%), EP300 (8%), ARID1A (6%), TSPYL2 (6%), FBXW7 (29%), SPOP (8%), MAP3K4 (6%) and ABCC9 (6%). Overall, 36.5% of serous tumors had mutated a chromatin-remodeling gene and 35% had mutated a ubiquitin ligase complex gene, implicating the frequent mutational disruption of these processes in the molecular pathogenesis of one of the deadliest forms of endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthieu Le Gallo
- Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, US National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Banerji S, Cibulskis K, Rangel-Escareño C, Brown KK, Carter SL, Frederick AM, Lawrence MS, Sivachenko AY, Sougnez C, Zou L, Cortes ML, Fernandez-Lopez JC, Peng S, Ardlie KG, Auclair D, Bautista-Piña V, Duke F, Francis J, Jung J, Maffuz-Aziz A, Onofrio RC, Parkin M, Pho NH, Quintanar-Jurado V, Ramos AH, Rebollar-Vega R, Rodríguez-Cuevas SA, Romero-Cordoba SL, Schumacher SE, Stransky N, Thompson KM, Uribe-Figueroa L, Baselga J, Beroukhim R, Polyak K, Sgroi DC, Richardson AL, Jimenez-Sánchez G, Lander ES, Gabriel SB, Garraway LA, Golub TR, Meléndez-Zajgla J, Toker A, Getz G, Meyerson M, Hidalgo-Miranda A. Abstract PL07-01: Molecular profiling of breast cancer in Mexico: Identification of novel therapeutic targets through whole genome sequencing analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2012. [DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.disp12-pl07-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Today, more than 55% of the world's breast cancer cases are diagnosed in low and middle-income countries and in 2020, more that 70% of the cases will come from the developing nations. In Mexico, breast cancer-specific mortality doubled during the past 20 years, representing the second-leading cause of death in women between 30 and 59 years and the leading cause of cancer related death in the female population. According to statistics, in Mexico a woman dies due to breast cancer every two hours. Even though breast cancer represents a major public health problem in the developing world, knowledge about the genetic and genomic structure of breast tumors in Mexican or Latin American populations is very limited. In the past four years, we have participated in the Slim Initiative of Genomic Medicine (SIGMA) Project, a collaboration between the Carlos Slim Institute of Health, the Broad Institute, and the National Institute of Genomic Medicine in Mexico city. The goal of the SIGMA project is to characterize the genomic basis of common diseases, including several types of cancer. This effort has focused on the application of whole genome and whole exome sequencing of human tumors. In the case of breast cancer, we have analyzed the whole genomes of 22 tumor/normal tissue pairs and the whole exomes of 103 tumor/normal tissues from Mexican and Vietnamese patients. Sequence analysis led to the novel identification of potential loss of function mutations of the CBFB transcription factor, and deletions of its partner RUNX1, an event which has never been previously reported in breast tumors or in any other epithelial tumor. Of clinical relevance, we also identified a somatic translocation involving MAGI3 and AKT3 in a triple negative breast tumor. Ectopic expression of the fusion transcrip leads to constitutive phosphorylation of downstream GSK and loss of contact inhibition. Most importantly, the activity of the fusion protein can be abrogated by an ATP-competitive small molecule inhibitor of AKT, potentially representing a new therapeutic avenue for these patients. In parallel with sequencing, we have also been working on the analysis of somatic DNA copy number aberrations, messenger RNA expression, and microRNA expression patterns in tumors from Mexican patients. Intrinsic breast cancer sub-typing in 125 tumors from Mexican patients showed that 13.6% of the tumors were basal-like, 16.8% were Her2-enriched, 24.8% Luminal A, 34.4% Luminal B and 10.4 normal-like. With microRNA expression, we have identified a group of microRNAs whose role in breast cancer has not been previously described and are currently analyzing differential microRNA expression across tumor sub-types, in particular triple negative tumors, where we have been able to identify at least three different tumor sub-groups based on microRNA expression patterns.
Citation Format: Shantanu Banerji, Kristian Cibulskis, Claudia Rangel-Escareño, Kristin K. Brown, Scott L. Carter, Abbie M. Frederick, Michael S. Lawrence, Andrey Y. Sivachenko, Carrie Sougnez, Lihua Zou, Maria L. Cortes, Juan C. Fernandez-Lopez, Shouyong Peng, Kristin G. Ardlie, Daniel Auclair, Veronica Bautista-Piña, Fujiko Duke, Joshua Francis, Joonil Jung, Antonio Maffuz-Aziz, Robert C. Onofrio, Melissa Parkin, Nam H. Pho, Valeria Quintanar-Jurado, Alex H. Ramos, Rosa Rebollar-Vega, Sergio A. Rodríguez-Cuevas, Sandra L. Romero-Cordoba, Steven E. Schumacher, Nicolas Stransky, Kristin M. Thompson, Laura Uribe-Figueroa, Jose Baselga, Rameen Beroukhim, Kornelia Polyak, Dennis C. Sgroi, Andrea L. Richardson, Gerardo Jimenez-Sánchez, Eric S. Lander, Stacey B. Gabriel, Levi A. Garraway, Todd R. Golub, Jorge Meléndez-Zajgla, Alex Toker, Gad Getz, Matthew Meyerson, Alfredo Hidalgo-Miranda. Molecular profiling of breast cancer in Mexico: Identification of novel therapeutic targets through whole genome sequencing analysis. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fifth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2012 Oct 27-30; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2012;21(10 Suppl):Abstract nr PL07-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lihua Zou
- 1The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Fujiko Duke
- 1The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA,
| | | | - Joonil Jung
- 1The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA,
| | | | | | | | - Nam H. Pho
- 1The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA,
| | | | - Alex H. Ramos
- 1The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Todd R. Golub
- 1The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA,
| | | | - Alex Toker
- 3Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA,
| | - Gad Getz
- 1The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Febbo PG, Ladanyi M, Aldape KD, De Marzo AM, Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Iafrate AJ, Kelley RK, Marcucci G, Ogino S, Pao W, Sgroi DC, Birkeland ML. NCCN Task Force report: Evaluating the clinical utility of tumor markers in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2012; 9 Suppl 5:S1-32; quiz S33. [PMID: 22138009 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2011.0137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 199] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
The molecular analysis of biomarkers in oncology is rapidly advancing, but the incorporation of new molecular tests into clinical practice will require a greater understanding of the genetic changes that drive malignancy, the assays used to measure the resulting phenotypes and genotypes, and the regulatory processes that new molecular biomarkers must face to be accepted for clinical use. To address these issues and provide an overview of current molecular testing in 6 major malignancies, including glioma, breast cancer, colon cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, and acute myelogenous leukemia, an NCCN Task Force was convened on the topic of evaluating the clinical utility of tumor markers in oncology. The output of this meeting, contained within this report, describes the ways biomarkers have been developed and used; defines common terminology, including prognostic, predictive, and companion diagnostic markers, and analytic validity, clinical validity, and clinical utility; and proposes the use of a combination level of evidence score to aid in the evaluation of novel biomarker tests as they arise. The current state of regulatory oversight and anticipated changes in the regulation of molecular testing are also addressed.
Collapse
|
41
|
Imielinski M, Cha S, Rejtar T, Richardson EA, Karger BL, Sgroi DC. Integrated proteomic, transcriptomic, and biological network analysis of breast carcinoma reveals molecular features of tumorigenesis and clinical relapse. Mol Cell Proteomics 2012; 11:M111.014910. [PMID: 22240506 DOI: 10.1074/mcp.m111.014910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Gene and protein expression changes observed with tumorigenesis are often interpreted independently of each other and out of context of biological networks. To address these limitations, this study examined several approaches to integrate transcriptomic and proteomic data with known protein-protein and signaling interactions in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer tumors. An approach that built networks from differentially expressed proteins and identified among them networks enriched in differentially expressed genes yielded the greatest success. This method identified a set of genes and proteins linking pathways of cellular stress response, cancer metabolism, and tumor microenvironment. The proposed network underscores several biologically intriguing events not previously studied in the context of ER+ breast cancer, including the overexpression of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and the overexpression of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1. A gene-based expression signature biomarker built from this network was significantly predictive of clinical relapse in multiple independent cohorts of ER+ breast cancer patients, even after correcting for standard clinicopathological variables. The results of this study demonstrate the utility and power of an integrated quantitative proteomic, transcriptomic, and network analysis approach to discover robust and clinically meaningful molecular changes in tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcin Imielinski
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Bell DW, Sikdar N, Lee KY, Price JC, Chatterjee R, Park HD, Fox J, Ishiai M, Rudd ML, Pollock LM, Fogoros SK, Mohamed H, Hanigan CL, Zhang S, Cruz P, Renaud G, Hansen NF, Cherukuri PF, Borate B, McManus KJ, Stoepel J, Sipahimalani P, Godwin AK, Sgroi DC, Merino MJ, Elliot G, Elkahloun A, Vinson C, Takata M, Mullikin JC, Wolfsberg TG, Hieter P, Lim DS, Myung K. Predisposition to cancer caused by genetic and functional defects of mammalian Atad5. PLoS Genet 2011; 7:e1002245. [PMID: 21901109 PMCID: PMC3161924 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2011] [Accepted: 06/28/2011] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
ATAD5, the human ortholog of yeast Elg1, plays a role in PCNA deubiquitination. Since PCNA modification is important to regulate DNA damage bypass, ATAD5 may be important for suppression of genomic instability in mammals in vivo. To test this hypothesis, we generated heterozygous (Atad5+/m) mice that were haploinsuffficient for Atad5. Atad5+/m mice displayed high levels of genomic instability in vivo, and Atad5+/m mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) exhibited molecular defects in PCNA deubiquitination in response to DNA damage, as well as DNA damage hypersensitivity and high levels of genomic instability, apoptosis, and aneuploidy. Importantly, 90% of haploinsufficient Atad5+/m mice developed tumors, including sarcomas, carcinomas, and adenocarcinomas, between 11 and 20 months of age. High levels of genomic alterations were evident in tumors that arose in the Atad5+/m mice. Consistent with a role for Atad5 in suppressing tumorigenesis, we also identified somatic mutations of ATAD5 in 4.6% of sporadic human endometrial tumors, including two nonsense mutations that resulted in loss of proper ATAD5 function. Taken together, our findings indicate that loss-of-function mutations in mammalian Atad5 are sufficient to cause genomic instability and tumorigenesis. Genomic instability is a hallmark of tumorigenesis, suggesting that mutations in genes suppressing genomic instability contribute to this phenotype. In this study, we demonstrate for the first time that haploinsufficiency for Atad5, a protein that is important in stabilizing stalled DNA replication forks by regulating PCNA ubiquitination during DNA damage bypass, predisposes >90% of mice to tumorigenesis in multiple organs. In heterozygous Atad5 mice, both somatic cells and the spontaneous tumors showed high levels of genomic instability. In a subset of sporadic human endometrial tumors, we identified heterozygous loss-of-function somatic mutations in the ATAD5 gene, consistent with the role of mouse Atad5 in suppressing tumorigenesis. Collectively, our findings suggest that ATAD5 may be a novel tumor suppressor gene.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne W. Bell
- Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
- * E-mail: (DWB); (KM)
| | - Nilabja Sikdar
- Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Kyoo-young Lee
- Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Jessica C. Price
- Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Raghunath Chatterjee
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Hee-Dong Park
- Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
- National Research Laboratory for Genomic Stability, Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Jennifer Fox
- Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Masamichi Ishiai
- Laboratory of DNA Damage Signaling, Department of Late Effect Studies, Radiation Biology Center, Kyoto University, Yoshidakonoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Meghan L. Rudd
- Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Lana M. Pollock
- Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Sarah K. Fogoros
- Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Hassan Mohamed
- Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Christin L. Hanigan
- Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | | | - Suiyuan Zhang
- Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Pedro Cruz
- Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Gabriel Renaud
- Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Nancy F. Hansen
- Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Praveen F. Cherukuri
- Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Bhavesh Borate
- Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Kirk J. McManus
- Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jan Stoepel
- Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Payal Sipahimalani
- Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Andrew K. Godwin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America
| | - Dennis C. Sgroi
- Molecular Pathology Unit and Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Maria J. Merino
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Gene Elliot
- Genetic Disease Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Abdel Elkahloun
- Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Charles Vinson
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Minoru Takata
- Laboratory of DNA Damage Signaling, Department of Late Effect Studies, Radiation Biology Center, Kyoto University, Yoshidakonoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - James C. Mullikin
- Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Tyra G. Wolfsberg
- Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Philip Hieter
- Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Dae-Sik Lim
- Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
- National Research Laboratory for Genomic Stability, Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Kyungjae Myung
- Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
- * E-mail: (DWB); (KM)
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lee J, Hirsh AS, Wittner BS, Maeder ML, Singavarapu R, Lang M, Janarthanan S, McDermott U, Yajnik V, Ramaswamy S, Joung JK, Sgroi DC. Induction of stable drug resistance in human breast cancer cells using a combinatorial zinc finger transcription factor library. PLoS One 2011; 6:e21112. [PMID: 21818254 PMCID: PMC3139592 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2011] [Accepted: 05/19/2011] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Combinatorial libraries of artificial zinc-finger transcription factors (ZF-TFs) provide a robust tool for inducing and understanding various functional components of the cancer phenotype. Herein, we utilized combinatorial ZF-TF library technology to better understand how breast cancer cells acquire resistance to fulvestrant, a clinically important anti-endocrine therapeutic agent. From a diverse collection of nearly 400,000 different ZF-TFs, we isolated six ZF-TF library members capable of inducing stable, long-term anti-endocrine drug-resistance in two independent estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cell lines. Comparative gene expression profile analysis of the six different ZF-TF-transduced breast cancer cell lines revealed five distinct clusters of differentially expressed genes. One cluster was shared among all 6 ZF-TF-transduced cell lines and therefore constituted a common fulvestrant-resistant gene expression signature. Pathway enrichment-analysis of this common fulvestrant resistant signature also revealed significant overlap with gene sets associated with an estrogen receptor-negative-like state and with gene sets associated with drug resistance to different classes of breast cancer anti-endocrine therapeutic agents. Enrichment-analysis of the four remaining unique gene clusters revealed overlap with myb-regulated genes. Finally, we also demonstrated that the common fulvestrant-resistant signature is associated with poor prognosis by interrogating five independent, publicly available human breast cancer gene expression datasets. Our results demonstrate that artificial ZF-TF libraries can be used successfully to induce stable drug-resistance in human cancer cell lines and to identify a gene expression signature that is associated with a clinically relevant drug-resistance phenotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeongeun Lee
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Andrew S. Hirsh
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Ben S. Wittner
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Morgan L. Maeder
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Rajasekhar Singavarapu
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Magdalena Lang
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Sailajah Janarthanan
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Ultan McDermott
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Research Limited, Hinxton, United Kingdom
| | - Vijay Yajnik
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Sridhar Ramaswamy
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - J. Keith Joung
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- * E-mail: (DCS); (JKJ)
| | - Dennis C. Sgroi
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- * E-mail: (DCS); (JKJ)
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Rudd ML, Price JC, Fogoros S, Godwin AK, Sgroi DC, Merino MJ, Bell DW. A unique spectrum of somatic PIK3CA (p110alpha) mutations within primary endometrial carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 2011; 17:1331-40. [PMID: 21266528 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-0540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 174] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The goal of this study was to comprehensively define the incidence of mutations in all exons of PIK3CA in both endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) and nonendometrioid endometrial cancer (NEEC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We resequenced all coding exons of PIK3CA and PTEN, and exons 1 and 2 of KRAS, from 108 primary endometrial tumors. Somatic mutations were confirmed by sequencing matched normal DNAs. The biochemical properties of a subset of novel PIK3CA mutations were determined by exogenously expressing wild type and mutant constructs in U2OS cells and measuring levels of AKT(Ser473) phosphorylation. RESULTS Somatic PIK3CA mutations were detected in 52.4% of 42 EECs and 33.3% of 66 NEECs. Half (29 of 58) of all nonsynonymous PIK3CA mutations were in exons 1-7 and half were in exons 9 and 20. The exons 1-7 mutations localized to the ABD, ABD-RBD linker and C2 domains of p110α. Within these regions, Arg88, Arg93, Gly106, Lys111, Glu365, and Glu453, were recurrently mutated; Arg88, Arg93, and Lys111 formed mutation hotspots. The p110α-R93W, -G106R, -G106V, -K111E, -delP449-L455, and -E453K mutants led to increased levels of phospho-AKT(Ser473) compared to wild-type p110α. Overall, 62% of exons 1-7 PIK3CA mutants and 64% of exons 9-20 PIK3CA mutants were activating; 72% of exon 1-7 mutations have not previously been reported in endometrial cancer. CONCLUSIONS Our study identified a new subgroup of endometrial cancer patients with activating mutations in the amino-terminal domains of p110α; these patients might be appropriate for consideration in clinical trials of targeted therapies directed against the PI3K pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan L Rudd
- Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Wong JS, Smith BL, Troyan SL, Gadd MA, Gelman R, Lester SC, Schnitt SJ, Sgroi DC, Chen YH, Silver BJ, Harris JR. Abstract P1-15-03: Eight-Year Update of a Prospective Study of Wide Excision Alone for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) of the Breast. Cancer Res 2010. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs10-p1-15-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The need for radiation therapy (RT) in conservatively managed DCIS is a source of ongoing debate. This is an updated analysis of a phase II prospective study of wide excision alone for DCIS. The study was activated in May 1995 and closed in July 2002 following accrual of 158 patients because the number of local recurrences (LR) met the predetermined stopping rules. The objective of the analysis is to update the distribution and cumulative incidence of events (LR, contralateral breast cancer [CBC], second malignancy and death from other causes). Materials and Methods: A total of 158 patients had DCIS with predominant nuclear grade 1 or 2, a mammographic extent of ≥2.5 cm, and excision with final microscopic margins of ≥1 cm or a re-excision without residual DCIS. Tamoxifen was not permitted. The results presented are from the 8-year analysis (8-year minimum potential follow-up time). Twenty-six patients without recurrence who were followed less than 8 years were excluded from the analysis as were 7 first events (4 LR) that occurred beyond 8 years of follow-up; the analysis thus includes 132 patients and 36 first events. Cumulative incidence curves were generated to assess the rates of LR or other events. Median follow up time was 10 years. Results: Overall, 36/132 patients (27%) had a first event as of April 2010. Of these 36 events, 19 were LR, 13 were CBC, 1 was a second malignancy, and 3 were deaths from other causes. Of the 19 LR, 13 (68%) were DCIS only and 6 (32%) were invasive. Fourteen occurred in the same quadrant and 5 were elsewhere in the ipsilateral breast. The 8-year estimated cumulative incidence of LR was 14.4% (95% CI: 8.4-20.4%). For all other events, the 8-year estimated cumulative incidence was 12.9% (95% CI: 3.6-13.1%).
The estimated annual percentage rates of LR, CBC, and other events were 2.1%, 1.5% and 0.4%, respectively.
Discussion: The results of this prospective study demonstrate a substantial and ongoing risk of LR and CBC in patients with small, nuclear grade 1 or 2 DCIS treated with wide excision with margins of ≥1cm in the absence of RT. Most LRs occurred in the same quadrant, rather than elsewhere in the breast, suggesting that excision alone is inadequate even for this highly selected population. Further study is warranted to determine if there is a subgroup of DCIS patients with nuclear grade 1 or 2 disease who are at low enough risk of LR following wide excision that RT can be omitted safely.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-15-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JS Wong
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - BL Smith
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - SL Troyan
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - MA Gadd
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - R Gelman
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - SC Lester
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - SJ Schnitt
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - DC Sgroi
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Y-H Chen
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - BJ Silver
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - JR. Harris
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Sgroi DC, Finkelstein DM, Shepherd L, Ingle JN, Rimm DL, Sasano H, Porter P, Pins M, Paik S, Ristimaki A, Pritchard KI, Tu D, Goss PE. Abstract P3-10-26: Quantitative Protein and Gene Expression Biomarkers of Tamoxifen and Letrozole Recurrence in the NCIC CTG MA.17 Cohort. Cancer Res 2010. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs10-p3-10-26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The MA.17 study showed that extended adjuvant endocrine therapy with letrozole (LET) after completing 5 years of tamoxifen (TAM) markedly reduced the risk of recurrence in women with ER+ early stage breast cancer and improved overall survival in women presenting with node +ve disease. The HOXB 13:IL17BR gene expression ratio (signature) has been shown to predict outcome in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen monotherapy and provides additional information beyond that from known positive (ER and PR) and negative (Her-1 and Her-2) predictors of responsiveness to tamoxifen in node-ve women. We report a case control evaluation of the Breast Cancer Index (BCI; bioTheranostics, Inc.), which combines the HOXB13 and IL17BR twogene and the molecular grade index (MGI) gene expression signatures, with respect to distinguishing which patients are at risk of late recurrences and who would respond to extended endocrine therapy with LET. The prognostic and predictive utility of quantitative immunofluorescence of ER, PR, Her-2, tumor aromatase, COX-2, GATA3 and Nat1 in the TAM-PLACEBO and the TAM-LET cohorts will also be evaluated and compared to results derived by standard immunohistochemistry. Methods: FFPE tumor blocks were collected from patients who experienced a breast cancer recurrence up to unblinding of MA.17. Controls were matched 2:1 for age, tumor size, lymph node status, and prior chemotherapy, and were all disease free for longer than cases. All cases were reviewed for standard histopathology by two independent pathologists. RNA was extracted, amplified, converted to cDNA and subjected to RT-PCR with primers and probes to HOXB13, IL17BR, BUB1A, CENPA, NEK2, RACGAP1 and RRM2. ER, PR HER1, HER2, COX2, Aromatase, GATA3 and NAT1 will be analyzed by routine IHC techniques and by immunoflourescent Automated Quantitative Analysis (AQuA).
Results: 105 cases and 210 matched controls are available for evaluation. All sections are under review and tissue microarrays have been performed on all cases and controls. Detailed results on the BCI and ER, PR, Her-2 will be available at the SABCS.
Discussion: MA.17 has shown that extended adjuvant endocrine therapy after tamoxifen is effective at preventing disease recurrence given for an additional 5 years. Numerous clinical trials are exploring whether extending AIs will show this benefit, and there is an increasing need to improve the therapeutic index by distinguishing those at risk from those who are not. It is also important to determine which patients will benefit from the therapy and which will recur without benefit. The latter patients could be triaged to clinical trials of novel therapies to overcome endocrine resistance. This study will help to define these issues and pave the way for more effective selection of specific patients for adjuvant endocrine strategies.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-10-26.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- DC Sgroi
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Tohoku University School of Medicine, Japan; University of Washington Medicine, Seattle; Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, IL; National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, Finland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - DM Finkelstein
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Tohoku University School of Medicine, Japan; University of Washington Medicine, Seattle; Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, IL; National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, Finland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - L Shepherd
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Tohoku University School of Medicine, Japan; University of Washington Medicine, Seattle; Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, IL; National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, Finland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - JN Ingle
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Tohoku University School of Medicine, Japan; University of Washington Medicine, Seattle; Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, IL; National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, Finland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - DL Rimm
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Tohoku University School of Medicine, Japan; University of Washington Medicine, Seattle; Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, IL; National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, Finland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - H Sasano
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Tohoku University School of Medicine, Japan; University of Washington Medicine, Seattle; Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, IL; National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, Finland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - P Porter
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Tohoku University School of Medicine, Japan; University of Washington Medicine, Seattle; Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, IL; National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, Finland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - M Pins
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Tohoku University School of Medicine, Japan; University of Washington Medicine, Seattle; Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, IL; National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, Finland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - S Paik
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Tohoku University School of Medicine, Japan; University of Washington Medicine, Seattle; Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, IL; National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, Finland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - A Ristimaki
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Tohoku University School of Medicine, Japan; University of Washington Medicine, Seattle; Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, IL; National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, Finland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - KI Pritchard
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Tohoku University School of Medicine, Japan; University of Washington Medicine, Seattle; Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, IL; National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, Finland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - D Tu
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Tohoku University School of Medicine, Japan; University of Washington Medicine, Seattle; Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, IL; National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, Finland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - PE Goss
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Tohoku University School of Medicine, Japan; University of Washington Medicine, Seattle; Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, IL; National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, Finland; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Bombonati A, Sgroi DC. The molecular pathology of breast cancer progression. J Pathol 2010; 223:307-17. [PMID: 21125683 DOI: 10.1002/path.2808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 224] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2010] [Revised: 10/08/2010] [Accepted: 10/09/2010] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The current model of human breast cancer progression proposes a linear multi-step process which initiates as flat epithelial atypia (FEA), progresses to atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), evolves into DCIS and culminates in the potentially lethal stage of invasive ductal carcinoma. For several decades a major challenge to human breast cancer research has been the identification of the molecular alterations associated with the different stages of breast cancer progression. Until recently, progress in attaining this goal has been hampered by technical limitations associated with applying advanced molecular technologies to the microscopic preinvasive stages of breast tumorigenesis. Recent advances in comprehensive, high-throughput genetic, transcriptomic and epigenetic technologies in combination with advanced microdissection and ex vivo isolation techniques have provided for a more complete understanding of the complex molecular genetic and molecular biological inter-relationships of the different stages of human breast cancer evolution. Here we review the molecular biological data suggesting that breast cancer develops and evolves along two distinct molecular genetic pathways. We also briefly review gene expression and epigenetic data that support the view of the tumour microenvironment as an important co-conspirator rather than a passive bystander during human breast tumorigenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Bombonati
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Molecular Pathology Research Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Cha S, Imielinski MB, Rejtar T, Richardson EA, Thakur D, Sgroi DC, Karger BL. In situ proteomic analysis of human breast cancer epithelial cells using laser capture microdissection: annotation by protein set enrichment analysis and gene ontology. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010; 9:2529-44. [PMID: 20739354 DOI: 10.1074/mcp.m110.000398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Identification of molecular signatures that allow detection of the transition from normal breast epithelial cells to malignant invasive cells is a critical component in the development of diagnostic, therapeutic, and preventative strategies for human breast cancer. Substantial efforts have been devoted to deciphering breast cancer etiology at the genome level, but only a limited number of studies have appeared at the proteome level. In this work, we compared individual in situ proteome profiles of nonpatient matched nine noncancerous, normal breast epithelial (NBE) samples with nine estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (luminal subtype), invasive malignant breast epithelial (MBE) samples by combining laser capture microdissection (LCM) and quantitative shotgun proteomics. A total of 12,970 unique peptides were identified from the 18 samples, and 1623 proteins were selected for quantitative analysis using spectral index (SpI) as a measure of protein abundance. A total of 298 proteins were differentially expressed between NBE and MBE at 95% confidence level, and this differential expression correlated well with immunohistochemistry (IHC) results reported in the Human Protein Atlas (HPA) database. To assess pathway level patterns in the observed expression changes, we developed protein set enrichment analysis (PSEA), a modification of a well-known approach in gene expression analysis, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). Unlike single gene-based functional term enrichment analyses that only examines pathway overrepresentation of proteins above a given significance threshold, PSEA applies a weighted running sum statistic to the entire expression data to discover significantly enriched protein groups. Application of PSEA to the expression data in this study revealed not only well-known ER-dependent and cellular morphology-dependent protein abundance changes, but also significant alterations of downstream targets for multiple transcription factors (TFs), suggesting a role for specific gene regulatory pathways in breast tumorigenesis. A parallel GOMiner analysis revealed both confirmatory and complementary data to PSEA. The combination of the two annotation approaches yielded extensive biological feature mapping for in depth analysis of the quantitative proteomic data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangwon Cha
- Barnett Institute, Northeastern University, MA 02115, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Marselli L, Thorne J, Dahiya S, Sgroi DC, Sharma A, Bonner-Weir S, Marchetti P, Weir GC. Gene expression profiles of Beta-cell enriched tissue obtained by laser capture microdissection from subjects with type 2 diabetes. PLoS One 2010; 5:e11499. [PMID: 20644627 PMCID: PMC2903480 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 210] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2010] [Accepted: 06/06/2010] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Changes in gene expression in pancreatic beta-cells from type 2 diabetes (T2D) should provide insights into their abnormal insulin secretion and turnover. Methodology/Principal Findings Frozen sections were obtained from cadaver pancreases of 10 control and 10 T2D human subjects. Beta-cell enriched samples were obtained by laser capture microdissection (LCM). RNA was extracted, amplified and subjected to microarray analysis. Further analysis was performed with DNA-Chip Analyzer (dChip) and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) software. There were changes in expression of genes linked to glucotoxicity. Evidence of oxidative stress was provided by upregulation of several metallothionein genes. There were few changes in the major genes associated with cell cycle, apoptosis or endoplasmic reticulum stress. There was differential expression of genes associated with pancreatic regeneration, most notably upregulation of members of the regenerating islet gene (REG) family and metalloproteinase 7 (MMP7). Some of the genes found in GWAS studies to be related to T2D were also found to be differentially expressed. IGF2BP2, TSPAN8, and HNF1B (TCF2) were upregulated while JAZF1 and SLC30A8 were downregulated. Conclusions/Significance This study made possible by LCM has identified many novel changes in gene expression that enhance understanding of the pathogenesis of T2D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorella Marselli
- Section on Islet Transplantation and Cell Biology, Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and the Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey Thorne
- Section on Islet Transplantation and Cell Biology, Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and the Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Sonika Dahiya
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Dennis C. Sgroi
- Molecular Pathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Arun Sharma
- Section on Islet Transplantation and Cell Biology, Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and the Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Susan Bonner-Weir
- Section on Islet Transplantation and Cell Biology, Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and the Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Piero Marchetti
- Section of Endocrinology and Metabolism of Organ Transplantation, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Gordon C. Weir
- Section on Islet Transplantation and Cell Biology, Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and the Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Sgroi DC. The HOXB13:IL17BR gene-expression ratio: a biomarker providing information above and beyond tumor grade. Biomark Med 2010; 3:99-102. [PMID: 20477500 DOI: 10.2217/bmm.09.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
|