1
|
Amiri M, Raimondo F, Fisher PM, Cacic Hribljan M, Sidaros A, Othman MH, Zibrandtsen I, Bergdal O, Fabritius ML, Hansen AE, Hassager C, Højgaard JLS, Jensen HR, Knudsen NV, Laursen EL, Møller JE, Nersesjan V, Nicolic M, Sigurdsson ST, Sitt JD, Sølling C, Welling KL, Willumsen LM, Hauerberg J, Larsen VA, Fabricius ME, Knudsen GM, Kjærgaard J, Møller K, Kondziella D. Multimodal Prediction of 3- and 12-Month Outcomes in ICU Patients with Acute Disorders of Consciousness. Neurocrit Care 2024; 40:718-733. [PMID: 37697124 PMCID: PMC10959792 DOI: 10.1007/s12028-023-01816-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In intensive care unit (ICU) patients with coma and other disorders of consciousness (DoC), outcome prediction is key to decision-making regarding prognostication, neurorehabilitation, and management of family expectations. Current prediction algorithms are largely based on chronic DoC, whereas multimodal data from acute DoC are scarce. Therefore, the Consciousness in Neurocritical Care Cohort Study Using Electroencephalography and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (i.e. CONNECT-ME; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02644265) investigates ICU patients with acute DoC due to traumatic and nontraumatic brain injuries, using electroencephalography (EEG) (resting-state and passive paradigms), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) (resting-state) and systematic clinical examinations. METHODS We previously presented results for a subset of patients (n = 87) concerning prediction of consciousness levels in the ICU. Now we report 3- and 12-month outcomes in an extended cohort (n = 123). Favorable outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 3, a cerebral performance category score ≤ 2, and a Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended score ≥ 4. EEG features included visual grading, automated spectral categorization, and support vector machine consciousness classifier. fMRI features included functional connectivity measures from six resting-state networks. Random forest and support vector machine were applied to EEG and fMRI features to predict outcomes. Here, random forest results are presented as areas under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curves or accuracy. Cox proportional regression with in-hospital death as a competing risk was used to assess independent clinical predictors of time to favorable outcome. RESULTS Between April 2016 and July 2021, we enrolled 123 patients (mean age 51 years, 42% women). Of 82 (66%) ICU survivors, 3- and 12-month outcomes were available for 79 (96%) and 77 (94%), respectively. EEG features predicted both 3-month (AUC 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-0.82]) and 12-month (AUC 0.74 [95% CI 0.71-0.77]) outcomes. fMRI features appeared to predict 3-month outcome (accuracy 0.69-0.78) both alone and when combined with some EEG features (accuracies 0.73-0.84) but not 12-month outcome (larger sample sizes needed). Independent clinical predictors of time to favorable outcome were younger age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04 [95% CI 1.02-1.06]), traumatic brain injury (HR 1.94 [95% CI 1.04-3.61]), command-following abilities at admission (HR 2.70 [95% CI 1.40-5.23]), initial brain imaging without severe pathological findings (HR 2.42 [95% CI 1.12-5.22]), improving consciousness in the ICU (HR 5.76 [95% CI 2.41-15.51]), and favorable visual-graded EEG (HR 2.47 [95% CI 1.46-4.19]). CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that EEG and fMRI features and readily available clinical data predict short-term outcome of patients with acute DoC and that EEG also predicts 12-month outcome after ICU discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moshgan Amiri
- Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Federico Raimondo
- Brain and Behaviour, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Patrick M Fisher
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Melita Cacic Hribljan
- Department of Neurophysiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Annette Sidaros
- Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Neurophysiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marwan H Othman
- Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ivan Zibrandtsen
- Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Neurophysiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ove Bergdal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maria Louise Fabritius
- Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Adam Espe Hansen
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christian Hassager
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Joan Lilja S Højgaard
- Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Helene Ravnholt Jensen
- Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Niels Vendelbo Knudsen
- Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Emilie Lund Laursen
- Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jacob E Møller
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vardan Nersesjan
- Biological and Precision Psychiatry, Copenhagen Research Center for Mental Health, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Miki Nicolic
- Department of Neurophysiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sigurdur Thor Sigurdsson
- Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jacobo D Sitt
- Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute, Inserm, Centre nationl de la recherche scientifique, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital de La Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Christine Sølling
- Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Karen Lise Welling
- Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lisette M Willumsen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - John Hauerberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vibeke Andrée Larsen
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin Ejler Fabricius
- Department of Neurophysiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gitte Moos Knudsen
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jesper Kjærgaard
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Møller
- Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Daniel Kondziella
- Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Amiri M, Fisher PM, Raimondo F, Sidaros A, Cacic Hribljan M, Othman MH, Zibrandtsen I, Albrechtsen SS, Bergdal O, Hansen AE, Hassager C, Højgaard JLS, Jakobsen EW, Jensen HR, Møller J, Nersesjan V, Nikolic M, Olsen MH, Sigurdsson ST, Sitt JD, Sølling C, Welling KL, Willumsen LM, Hauerberg J, Larsen VA, Fabricius M, Knudsen GM, Kjaergaard J, Møller K, Kondziella D. Multimodal prediction of residual consciousness in the intensive care unit: the CONNECT-ME study. Brain 2022; 146:50-64. [PMID: 36097353 PMCID: PMC9825454 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awac335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Functional MRI (fMRI) and EEG may reveal residual consciousness in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC), as reflected by a rapidly expanding literature on chronic DoC. However, acute DoC is rarely investigated, although identifying residual consciousness is key to clinical decision-making in the intensive care unit (ICU). Therefore, the objective of the prospective, observational, tertiary centre cohort, diagnostic phase IIb study 'Consciousness in neurocritical care cohort study using EEG and fMRI' (CONNECT-ME, NCT02644265) was to assess the accuracy of fMRI and EEG to identify residual consciousness in acute DoC in the ICU. Between April 2016 and November 2020, 87 acute DoC patients with traumatic or non-traumatic brain injury were examined with repeated clinical assessments, fMRI and EEG. Resting-state EEG and EEG with external stimulations were evaluated by visual analysis, spectral band analysis and a Support Vector Machine (SVM) consciousness classifier. In addition, within- and between-network resting-state connectivity for canonical resting-state fMRI networks was assessed. Next, we used EEG and fMRI data at study enrolment in two different machine-learning algorithms (Random Forest and SVM with a linear kernel) to distinguish patients in a minimally conscious state or better (≥MCS) from those in coma or unresponsive wakefulness state (≤UWS) at time of study enrolment and at ICU discharge (or before death). Prediction performances were assessed with area under the curve (AUC). Of 87 DoC patients (mean age, 50.0 ± 18 years, 43% female), 51 (59%) were ≤UWS and 36 (41%) were ≥ MCS at study enrolment. Thirty-one (36%) patients died in the ICU, including 28 who had life-sustaining therapy withdrawn. EEG and fMRI predicted consciousness levels at study enrolment and ICU discharge, with maximum AUCs of 0.79 (95% CI 0.77-0.80) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.77-0.80), respectively. Models based on combined EEG and fMRI features predicted consciousness levels at study enrolment and ICU discharge with maximum AUCs of 0.78 (95% CI 0.71-0.86) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.75-0.89), respectively, with improved positive predictive value and sensitivity. Overall, both machine-learning algorithms (SVM and Random Forest) performed equally well. In conclusion, we suggest that acute DoC prediction models in the ICU be based on a combination of fMRI and EEG features, regardless of the machine-learning algorithm used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Annette Sidaros
- Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark,Department of Neurophysiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Melita Cacic Hribljan
- Department of Neurophysiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marwan H Othman
- Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ivan Zibrandtsen
- Department of Neurophysiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Simon S Albrechtsen
- Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ove Bergdal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Adam Espe Hansen
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christian Hassager
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark,Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Joan Lilja S Højgaard
- Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Helene Ravnholt Jensen
- Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jacob Møller
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vardan Nersesjan
- Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark,Biological and Precision Psychiatry, Copenhagen Research Center for Mental Health, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Miki Nikolic
- Department of Neurophysiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Markus Harboe Olsen
- Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sigurdur Thor Sigurdsson
- Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jacobo D Sitt
- Sorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, Inserm, CNRS, APHP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Christine Sølling
- Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Karen Lise Welling
- Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lisette M Willumsen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - John Hauerberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vibeke Andrée Larsen
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin Fabricius
- Department of Neurophysiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gitte Moos Knudsen
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jesper Kjaergaard
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark,Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Møller
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark,Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Daniel Kondziella
- Correspondence to: Daniel Kondziella, MD, MSc, PhD FEBN Department of Neurology Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pape P, Jensen AH, Bergdal O, Munch TN, Rudolph SS, Rasmussen LS. Time to CT scan for patients with acute severe neurological symptoms: a quality assurance study. Sci Rep 2022; 12:15269. [PMID: 36088471 PMCID: PMC9464221 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-19512-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Emergent brain computed tomography (CT) scan allows for identification of patients presenting with acute severe neurological symptoms in whom medical and surgical interventions may be lifesaving. The aim of this study was to evaluate if time to CT from arrival at the emergency department exceeded 30 min in patients admitted with acute severe neurological symptoms. This was a retrospective register-based quality assurance study. We identified patients admitted to the emergency department with acute severe neurological symptoms between April 1st, 2016 and September 30th, 2020. Data were retrieved from the registry of acute medical team activations. We considered that time to CT from arrival at the emergency department should not exceed 30 min in more than 10% of patients. A total of 559 patients were included. Median time from arrival at the emergency department until CT scan was 24 min (IQR 16–35) in children (< 18 years), 10 min (IQR 7–17) for adults (18–59 years), and 11 min (IQR 7–16) for elders (> 60 years). This time interval exceeded 30 min for 8.2% (95% CI 6.1–10.9) of all included patients, 35.3% of children, 5.9% of adults, and 8.6% of elders. No children died within 30 days. The 30-day mortality was 21.3% (95% CI 16.4–27) in adults, and 43.9% (95% CI 38.2–49.8) in elders. Time from arrival at our emergency department until brain CT scan exceeded 30 min in 8.2% of all included patients but exceeded the defined quality aim in children and could be improved.
Collapse
|
4
|
Høck AN, Jensen SR, Sværke KW, Brennum J, Jespersen B, Bergdal O, Karlsborg M, Hjermind LE, Løkkegaard A. A randomised double-blind controlled study of Deep Brain Stimulation for dystonia in STN or GPi – A long term follow-up after up to 15 years. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2022; 96:74-79. [DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2022.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
5
|
Albrechtsen SS, Riis RGC, Amiri M, Tanum G, Bergdal O, Blaabjerg M, Simonsen CZ, Kondziella D. Impact of MRI on decision-making in ICU patients with disorders of consciousness. Behav Brain Res 2021; 421:113729. [PMID: 34973968 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recovery of consciousness is the most important survival factor in patients with acute brain injury and disorders of consciousness (DoC). Since most deaths in the intensive care unit (ICU) occur after withdrawal of life-support, medical decision-making is crucial for acute DoC patients. Neuroimaging informs decision-making, yet the precise effects of MRI on decision-making in the ICU are poorly understood. We investigated the impact of brain MRI on prognostication, therapeutic decisions and physician confidence in ICU patients with DoC. METHODS In this simulated decision-making study utilizing a prospective ICU cohort, a panel of neurocritical experts first reviewed clinical information (without MRI) from 75 acute DoC patients and made decisions about diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. Following review of the MRI, the panel then decided if the initial decisions needed revision. In parallel, a blinded neuroradiologist reassessed all neuroimaging. RESULTS MRI led to changes in clinical management of 57 (76%) of patients (Number-Needed-to-Test for any change: 1.32), including revised diagnoses (20%), levels of care (21%), diagnostic confidence (43%) and prognostications (33%). Decisions were revised more often with stroke than with other brain injuries (p = 0.02). However, although MRI revealed additional pathology in 81%, this did not predict revised clinical decision-making (p-values ≥0.08). CONCLUSION MRI results changed decision-making in 3 of 4 ICU patients, but radiological findings were not predictive of clinical decision-making. This highlights the need to better understand the effects of neuroimaging on management decisions. How MRI influences decision-making in the ICU is an important avenue for research to improve acute DoC management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon S Albrechtsen
- Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Robert G C Riis
- Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Moshgan Amiri
- Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Gry Tanum
- Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Ove Bergdal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
| | | | | | - Daniel Kondziella
- Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Søndergaard CB, Bergdal O, Buch KF. [Meralgia paraesthetica]. Ugeskr Laeger 2020; 182:V04190230. [PMID: 32286209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
This review summarises the treatment of meralgia paraesthetica. The condition is easy to recognise clinically, and in most cases the effect of conservative treatment is good. In case of persistent symptoms, further work-up is recommended including neurophysiological testing and ultrasound examination. If surgery is decided, we recommend nerve decompression primarily, since this procedure holds a success rate of 60-70%. In case of persistent symptoms, neurectomy should be performed. Ultrasound examination immediately before surgery can be helpful in localising the nerve and shortening procedural time.
Collapse
|
7
|
Søndergaard CB, Bergdal O, Munch TN, Fugleholm K. [Organisation of peripheral nerve surgery in Denmark]. Ugeskr Laeger 2019; 181:V06190347. [PMID: 31928616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
This review summarises the current knowledge of peripheral nerve surgery (PNS) in Denmark, which comprises the surgery of traumatic nerve lesions, entrapment syndromes, nerve tumours, and biopsies. Although the Danish Health Authority generally works towards a centralisation of PNS, it is actually performed at a widespread number of hospitals, of which some perform a very low number of procedures per year. International standards are highly specialised centres with subspecialists of PNS, high caseload, and integrated rehabilitation facilities. The future organisation of PNS in Denmark should comply with international standards.
Collapse
|
8
|
Bergdal O, Springborg JB, Holst AV, Hauerberg J, Way S, Breum P, Romner B. Accuracy of tunnelated vs. bolt-connected external ventricular drains. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013; 115:1972-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.05.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2013] [Revised: 05/26/2013] [Accepted: 05/27/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|