1
|
Javaid MK, Pinedo-Villanueva R, Shah A, Mohsin Z, Hiligsmann M, Motek-Soulié A, Fuggle NR, Halbout P, Cooper C. The Capture the Fracture® Partnership: an overview of a global initiative to increase the secondary fracture prevention care for patient benefit. Osteoporos Int 2023; 34:1827-1835. [PMID: 37418152 PMCID: PMC10579122 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-023-06759-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
The Capture the Fracture® Partnership (CTF-P) is a unique collaboration between the International Osteoporosis Foundation, academic units and industry partners to enhance the implementation of effective, efficient fracture liaison services (FLSs) with a good patient experience. CTF-P has generated valuable resources for the specific countries as well as the broader FLS community to improve the initiation, effectiveness and sustainability of FLS in a wide range of healthcare settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M K Javaid
- The Botnar Research Centre, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Old Rd, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LD, United Kingdom.
| | | | - A Shah
- NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Z Mohsin
- NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - M Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - A Motek-Soulié
- International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland
| | - N R Fuggle
- MRC LEU, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - P Halbout
- International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland
| | - C Cooper
- NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- MRC LEU, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cooper C, Dawson-Hughes B, Halbout P, Harvey NC, Kanis JA, Reginster JY, Rizzoli R. In Memoriam : Lorie Fitzpatrick MD - 1954-2023. Osteoporos Int 2023; 34:1281-1282. [PMID: 37162536 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-023-06767-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- C Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - B Dawson-Hughes
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Tufts Medical Center, and Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - P Halbout
- International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland
| | - N C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - J A Kanis
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | - J-Y Reginster
- World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Center for Public Health Aspects of Musculoskeletal Health and Aging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
- Division of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - R Rizzoli
- Division of Bone Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zerbini C, Orcesi Pedro A, Pereira RM, Lazaretti-Castro M, Halbout P, Cooper C. Correction to: In memoriam: Bernardo Stolnicki. Osteoporos Int 2022; 33:751. [PMID: 35079854 PMCID: PMC9172868 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-022-06322-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- C Zerbini
- Centro Paulista de Investigação Clínica, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - A Orcesi Pedro
- Osteoporosis National Specialized Committee-FEBRASGO, Regional Advisory Council-Latin America-IOF, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil
| | - R M Pereira
- Rheumatology Division, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - M Lazaretti-Castro
- Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - P Halbout
- International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland
| | - C Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
- NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zerbini C, Pedro AO, Pereira RM, Lazaretti-Castro M, Halbout P, Cooper C. In memoriam: Bernardo Stolnicki. Osteoporos Int 2022; 33:313. [PMID: 34791533 PMCID: PMC8758605 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-021-06235-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- C Zerbini
- Centro Paulista de Investigação Clínica, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - A Orcesi Pedro
- Osteoporosis National Specialized Committee-FEBRASGO, Regional Advisory Council-Latin America-IOF, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil
| | - R M Pereira
- Rheumatology Division, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - M Lazaretti-Castro
- Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - P Halbout
- International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland
| | - C Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
- NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chandran M, Mitchell PJ, Amphansap T, Bhadada SK, Chadha M, Chan DC, Chung YS, Ebeling P, Gilchrist N, Habib Khan A, Halbout P, Hew FL, Lan HPT, Lau TC, Lee JK, Lekamwasam S, Lyubomirsky G, Mercado-Asis LB, Mithal A, Nguyen TV, Pandey D, Reid IR, Suzuki A, Chit TT, Tiu KL, Valleenukul T, Yung CK, Zhao YL. Publisher Correction to: Development of the Asia Pacific Consortium on Osteoporosis (APCO) framework: clinical standards of care for the screening, diagnosis, and management of osteoporosis in the Asia-Pacific region. Osteoporos Int 2021; 32:1277-1278. [PMID: 34043033 PMCID: PMC8192350 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-021-05953-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M Chandran
- Department of Endocrinology, Osteoporosis and Bone Metabolism Unit, Singapore General Hospital, 20, College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
| | - P J Mitchell
- Synthesis Medical NZ Limited, Pukekohe, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - T Amphansap
- Department of Orthopedics, Police General Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - S K Bhadada
- Department of Endocrinology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - M Chadha
- Department of Endocrinology, Hinduja Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - D-C Chan
- Internal Medicine, National University Hospital Chu-Tung Branch, Chinese Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Y-S Chung
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| | - P Ebeling
- Department of Medicine in the School of Clinical Sciences, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - N Gilchrist
- Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - A Habib Khan
- Section of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - P Halbout
- International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland
| | - F L Hew
- Department of Medicine, Subang Jaya Medical Centre, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
| | - H-P T Lan
- Musculoskeletal and Metabolic Unit, Biomedical Research Center, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Bone and Muscle Research Group, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - T C Lau
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - J K Lee
- Department of Orthopedics, Beacon International Specialist Centre, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
| | - S Lekamwasam
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ruhuna, Galle, Sri Lanka
| | | | - L B Mercado-Asis
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines
| | - A Mithal
- Endocrinology, Diabetes Division, Mithal, M. Max Healthcare - Pan-Max, Gurgaon, India
| | - T V Nguyen
- Genetics and Epidemiology of Osteoporosis Laboratory, Bone Biology Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Reseach, Sydney, Australia
| | - D Pandey
- Department of Orthopaedics, National Trauma Centre, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - I R Reid
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - A Suzuki
- Department of Endocrinology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan
| | - T T Chit
- East Yangon General Hospital, Yangon, Myanmar
| | - K L Tiu
- Polytrauma and Fragility Fracture Team, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - T Valleenukul
- Department of Orthopedics, Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - C K Yung
- Department of Endocrinology and Patient Safety Unit, Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Hospital, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam
| | - Y L Zhao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing United Family Hospital, Beijing, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chandran M, Mitchell PJ, Amphansap T, Bhadada SK, Chadha M, Chan DC, Chung YS, Ebeling P, Gilchrist N, Habib Khan A, Halbout P, Hew FL, Lan HPT, Lau TC, Lee JK, Lekamwasam S, Lyubomirsky G, Mercado-Asis LB, Mithal A, Nguyen TV, Pandey D, Reid IR, Suzuki A, Chit TT, Tiu KL, Valleenukul T, Yung CK, Zhao YL. Development of the Asia Pacific Consortium on Osteoporosis (APCO) Framework: clinical standards of care for the screening, diagnosis, and management of osteoporosis in the Asia-Pacific region. Osteoporos Int 2021; 32:1249-1275. [PMID: 33502559 PMCID: PMC8192320 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05742-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Guidelines for doctors managing osteoporosis in the Asia-Pacific region vary widely. We compared 18 guidelines for similarities and differences in five key areas. We then used a structured consensus process to develop clinical standards of care for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis and for improving the quality of care. PURPOSE Minimum clinical standards for assessment and management of osteoporosis are needed in the Asia-Pacific (AP) region to inform clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and to improve osteoporosis care. We present the framework of these clinical standards and describe its development. METHODS We conducted a structured comparative analysis of existing CPGs in the AP region using a "5IQ" model (identification, investigation, information, intervention, integration, and quality). One-hundred data elements were extracted from each guideline. We then employed a four-round Delphi consensus process to structure the framework, identify key components of guidance, and develop clinical care standards. RESULTS Eighteen guidelines were included. The 5IQ analysis demonstrated marked heterogeneity, notably in guidance on risk factors, the use of biochemical markers, self-care information for patients, indications for osteoporosis treatment, use of fracture risk assessment tools, and protocols for monitoring treatment. There was minimal guidance on long-term management plans or on strategies and systems for clinical quality improvement. Twenty-nine APCO members participated in the Delphi process, resulting in consensus on 16 clinical standards, with levels of attainment defined for those on identification and investigation of fragility fractures, vertebral fracture assessment, and inclusion of quality metrics in guidelines. CONCLUSION The 5IQ analysis confirmed previous anecdotal observations of marked heterogeneity of osteoporosis clinical guidelines in the AP region. The Framework provides practical, clear, and feasible recommendations for osteoporosis care and can be adapted for use in other such vastly diverse regions. Implementation of the standards is expected to significantly lessen the global burden of osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Chandran
- Department of Endocrinology, Osteoporosis and Bone Metabolism Unit, Singapore General Hospital, 20, College Road, Academia, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
| | - P J Mitchell
- Synthesis Medical NZ Limited, Pukekohe, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - T Amphansap
- Department of Orthopedics, Police General Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - S K Bhadada
- Department of Endocrinology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - M Chadha
- Department of Endocrinology, Hinduja Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - D-C Chan
- Internal Medicine, National University Hospital Chu-Tung Branch, Chinese Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Y-S Chung
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| | - P Ebeling
- Department of Medicine in the School of Clinical Sciences, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - N Gilchrist
- Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - A Habib Khan
- Section of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - P Halbout
- International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland
| | - F L Hew
- Department of Medicine, Subang Jaya Medical Centre, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
| | - H-P T Lan
- Musculoskeletal and Metabolic Unit, Biomedical Research Center, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Bone and Muscle Research Group, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - T C Lau
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - J K Lee
- Department of Orthopedics, Beacon International Specialist Centre, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
| | - S Lekamwasam
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ruhuna, Galle, Sri Lanka
| | | | - L B Mercado-Asis
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines
| | - A Mithal
- Endocrinology, Diabetes Division, Mithal, M. Max Healthcare - Pan-Max, Gurgaon, India
| | - T V Nguyen
- Genetics and Epidemiology of Osteoporosis Laboratory, Bone Biology Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Reseach, Sydney, Australia
| | - D Pandey
- Department of Orthopaedics, National Trauma Centre, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - I R Reid
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - A Suzuki
- Department of Endocrinology, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan
| | - T T Chit
- East Yangon General Hospital, Yangon, Myanmar
| | - K L Tiu
- Polytrauma and Fragility Fracture team, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - T Valleenukul
- Department of Orthopedics, Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - C K Yung
- Department of Endocrinology and Patient Safety Unit, Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Hospital, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam
| | - Y L Zhao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing United Family Hospital, Beijing, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fuggle NR, Singer A, Gill C, Patel A, Medeiros A, Mlotek AS, Pierroz DD, Halbout P, Harvey NC, Reginster JY, Cooper C, Greenspan SL. How has COVID-19 affected the treatment of osteoporosis? An IOF-NOF-ESCEO global survey. Osteoporos Int 2021; 32:611-617. [PMID: 33558957 PMCID: PMC7869913 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05793-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
The effects of COVID-19 have the potential to impact on the management of chronic diseases including osteoporosis. A global survey has demonstrated that these impacts include an increase in telemedicine consultations, delays in DXA scanning, interruptions in the supply of medications and reductions in parenteral medication delivery. INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 pandemic has had profound effects on the health of the global population both directly, via the sequelae of the infection, and indirectly, including the relative neglect of chronic disease management. Together the International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation sought to ascertain the impact on osteoporosis management. METHODS Questionnaires were electronically circulated to a sample of members of both learned bodies and included information regarding the location and specialty of respondents, current extent of face to face consultations, alterations in osteoporosis risk assessment, telemedicine experience, alterations to medication ascertainment and delivery and electronic health record (EHR) utilisation. Responses were collected, quantitative data analysed, and qualitative data assessed for recurring themes. RESULTS Responses were received from 209 healthcare workers from 53 countries, including 28% from Europe, 24% from North America, 19% from the Asia Pacific region, 17% from the Middle East and 12% from Latin America. Most respondents were physicians (85%) with physician assistants, physical therapists and nurses/nurse practitioners represented in the sample. The main three specialties represented included rheumatology (40%), endocrinology (22%) and orthopaedics (15%). In terms of the type of patient contact, 33% of respondents conducted telephone consultations and 21% video consultations. Bone mineral density assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) usage was affected with only 29% able to obtain a scan as recommended. The majority of clinicians (60%) had systems in place to identify patients receiving parenteral medication, and 43% of clinicians reported difficulty in arranging appropriate osteoporosis medications during the COVID-19 crisis. CONCLUSIONS To conclude through surveying a global sample of osteoporosis healthcare professionals, we have observed an increase in telemedicine consultations, delays in DXA scanning, interrupted supply of medications and reductions in parenteral medication delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N R Fuggle
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Alan Turing Institute, London, UK
| | - A Singer
- Departments of Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - C Gill
- National Osteoporosis Foundation, Arlington, VA, USA
| | - A Patel
- National Osteoporosis Foundation, Arlington, VA, USA
| | - A Medeiros
- National Osteoporosis Foundation, Arlington, VA, USA
| | - A S Mlotek
- International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland
| | - D D Pierroz
- International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland
| | - P Halbout
- International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland
| | - N C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - J-Y Reginster
- WHO Collaborating Center for Public Health Aspects of Musculo-Skeletal Health and Ageing, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium
- Biochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - C Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
- NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - S L Greenspan
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fuggle NR, Singer A, Gill C, Patel A, Medeiros A, Mlotek AS, Pierroz DD, Halbout P, Harvey NC, Reginster JY, Cooper C, Greenspan SL. Correction to: How has COVID-19 affected the treatment of osteoporosis? An IOF-NOF-ESCEO global survey. Osteoporos Int 2021; 32:801. [PMID: 33751152 PMCID: PMC7942214 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-021-05905-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1007/s00198-021-05905-7
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N R Fuggle
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Alan Turing Institute, London, UK
| | - A Singer
- Departments of Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - C Gill
- National Osteoporosis Foundation, Arlington, VA, USA
| | - A Patel
- National Osteoporosis Foundation, Arlington, VA, USA
| | - A Medeiros
- National Osteoporosis Foundation, Arlington, VA, USA
| | - A S Mlotek
- International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland
| | - D D Pierroz
- International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland
| | - P Halbout
- International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland
| | - N C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - J-Y Reginster
- WHO Collaborating Center for Public Health Aspects of Musculo-Skeletal Health and Ageing, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium
- Biochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - C Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
- NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - S L Greenspan
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cooper C, Halbout P, Dawson-Hughes B, Harvey NC, Kanis JA, Reginster JY, Rizzoli R. In memory of Harry K Genant. Osteoporos Int 2021; 32:607-608. [PMID: 33495876 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-021-05857-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- C Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - P Halbout
- NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - B Dawson-Hughes
- Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - N C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - J A Kanis
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK.
| | - J-Y Reginster
- Biochemistry Dept., College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - R Rizzoli
- Service of Bone Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chandran M, Bhadada SK, Ebeling PR, Gilchrist NL, Khan AH, Halbout P, Lekamwasam S, Lyubomirsky G, Mitchell PJ, Nguyen TV, Tiu KL. IQ driving QI: the Asia Pacific Consortium on Osteoporosis (APCO): an innovative and collaborative initiative to improve osteoporosis care in the Asia Pacific. Osteoporos Int 2020; 31:2077-2081. [PMID: 32561953 PMCID: PMC7560927 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05495-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Asia Pacific Consortium on Osteoporosis (APCO) comprises of clinical experts from across the Asia Pacific region, uniting to develop solutions to problems facing osteoporosis management and care. The vision of APCO is to reduce the burden of osteoporosis and fragility fractures in the Asia Pacific region. INTRODUCTION The Asia Pacific (AP) region comprises 71 countries with vastly different healthcare systems. It is predicted that by 2050, more than half the world's hip fractures will occur in this region. The Asia Pacific Consortium on Osteoporosis (APCO) was set up in May 2019 with the vision of reducing the burden of osteoporosis and fragility fractures in the AP region. METHODS APCO has so far brought together 39 clinical experts from countries and regions across the AP to develop solutions to challenges facing osteoporosis management and fracture prevention in this highly populous region of the world. APCO aims to achieve its vision by engaging with relevant stakeholders including healthcare providers, policy makers and the public. The initial APCO project is to develop and implement a Framework of pan-AP minimum clinical standards for the screening, diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS The Framework will serve as a platform upon which new national clinical guidelines can be developed or existing guidelines be revised, in a standardised fashion. The Framework will also facilitate benchmarking for provision of quality of care. It is hoped that the principles underlying the formation and functioning of APCO can be adopted by other regions and that every health care facility and progressively every country in the world can follow our aspirational path and progress towards best practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Chandran
- Osteoporosis and Bone Metabolism Unit, Department of Endocrinology, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
| | - S K Bhadada
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - P R Ebeling
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - N L Gilchrist
- Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - A H Khan
- Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - P Halbout
- International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland
| | | | | | - P J Mitchell
- Synthesis Medical NZ Limited, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - T V Nguyen
- The Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
- University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
| | - K L Tiu
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Javaid MK, Sami A, Lems W, Mitchell P, Thomas T, Singer A, Speerin R, Fujita M, Pierroz DD, Akesson K, Halbout P, Ferrari S, Cooper C. A patient-level key performance indicator set to measure the effectiveness of fracture liaison services and guide quality improvement: a position paper of the IOF Capture the Fracture Working Group, National Osteoporosis Foundation and Fragility Fracture Network. Osteoporos Int 2020; 31:1193-1204. [PMID: 32266437 PMCID: PMC7280347 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05377-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) Capture the Fracture® Campaign with the Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) and National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) has developed eleven patient-level key performance indicators (KPIs) for fracture liaison services (FLSs) to guide quality improvement. INTRODUCTION Fracture Liaison Services (FLSs) are recommended worldwide to reduce fracture risk after a sentinel fracture. Given not every FLS is automatically effective, the IOF Capture the Fracture working group has developed and implemented the Best Practice Framework to assess the organisational components of an FLS. We have now developed a complimentary KPI set that extends this assessment of performance to the patient level. METHODS The Capture the Fracture working group in collaboration with the Fragility Fracture Network Secondary Fragility Fracture Special Interest Group and National Osteoporosis Foundation adapted existing metrics from the UK-based Fracture Liaison Service Database Audit to develop a patient-level KPI set for FLSs. RESULTS Eleven KPIs were selected. The proportion of patients: with non-spinal fractures; with spine fractures (detected clinically and radiologically); assessed for fracture risk within 12 weeks of sentinel fracture; having DXA assessment within 12 weeks of sentinel fracture; having falls risk assessment; recommended anti-osteoporosis medication; commenced of strength and balance exercise intervention within 16 weeks of sentinel fracture; monitored within 16 weeks of sentinel fracture; started anti-osteoporosis medication within 16 weeks of sentinel fracture; prescribed anti-osteoporosis medication 52 weeks after sentinel fracture. The final KPI measures data completeness for each of the other KPIs. For these indicators, levels of achievement were set at the < 50%, 50-80% and > 80% levels except for treatment recommendation where a level of 50% was used. CONCLUSION This KPI set compliments the existing Best Practice Framework to support FLSs to examine their own performance using patient-level data. By using this KPI set for local quality improvement cycles, FLSs will be able to efficiently realise the full potential of secondary fracture prevention and improved clinical outcomes for their local populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M K Javaid
- The Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Orthopaedic Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX4 7LD, UK.
| | - A Sami
- The Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Orthopaedic Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX4 7LD, UK
| | - W Lems
- VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P Mitchell
- The Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Orthopaedic Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX4 7LD, UK
- School of Medicine, Sydney Campus, The University of Notre Dame Australia, 140 Broadway, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia
| | - T Thomas
- Department of Rheumatology, Hôpital Nord, CHU de Saint-Etienne, and INSERM U1059, University of Lyon, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - A Singer
- Department of Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - R Speerin
- Fragility Fracture Network, Zürich, Switzerland
- Musculoskeletal Network, NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation, Chatswood, Australia
| | - M Fujita
- International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland
| | - D D Pierroz
- International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland
| | - K Akesson
- Department of Orthopaedics, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - P Halbout
- International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland
| | - S Ferrari
- Division of Bone Disease, Department of Internal Medicine Specialties, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - C Cooper
- The Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Orthopaedic Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX4 7LD, UK
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hiligsmann M, Cornelissen D, Vrijens B, Abrahamsen B, Al-Daghri N, Biver E, Brandi ML, Bruyère O, Burlet N, Cooper C, Cortet B, Dennison E, Diez-Perez A, Gasparik A, Grosso A, Hadji P, Halbout P, Kanis JA, Kaufman JM, Laslop A, Maggi S, Rizzoli R, Thomas T, Tuzun S, Vlaskovska M, Reginster JY. Determinants, consequences and potential solutions to poor adherence to anti-osteoporosis treatment: results of an expert group meeting organized by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) and the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF). Osteoporos Int 2019; 30:2155-2165. [PMID: 31388696 PMCID: PMC6811382 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-019-05104-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2019] [Accepted: 07/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Many patients at increased risk of fractures do not take their medication appropriately, resulting in a substantial decrease in the benefits of drug therapy. Improving medication adherence is urgently needed but remains laborious, given the numerous and multidimensional reasons for non-adherence, suggesting the need for measurement-guided, multifactorial and individualized solutions. INTRODUCTION Poor adherence to medications is a major challenge in the treatment of osteoporosis. This paper aimed to provide an overview of the consequences, determinants and potential solutions to poor adherence and persistence to osteoporosis medication. METHODS A working group was organized by the European Society on Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal diseases (ESCEO) to review consequences, determinants and potential solutions to adherence and to make recommendations for practice and further research. A systematic literature review and a face-to-face experts meeting were undertaken. RESULTS Medication non-adherence is associated with increased risk of fractures, leading to a substantial decrease in the clinical and economic benefits of drug therapy. Reasons for non-adherence are numerous and multidimensional for each patient, depending on the interplay of multiple factors, suggesting the need for multifactorial and individualized solutions. Few interventions have been shown to improve adherence or persistence to osteoporosis treatment. Promising actions include patient education with counselling, adherence monitoring with feedback and dose simplification including flexible dosing regimen. Recommendations for practice and further research were also provided. To adequately manage adherence, it is important to (1) understand the problem (initiation, implementation and/or persistence), (2) to measure adherence and (3) to identify the reason of non-adherence and fix it. CONCLUSION These recommendations are intended for clinicians to manage adherence of their patients and to researchers and policy makers to design, facilitate and appropriately use adherence interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - D Cornelissen
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - B Vrijens
- Research and Development, AARDEX Group and Department of Public Health, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium
| | - B Abrahamsen
- Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Institute of Clinical Resesarch, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Medicine, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark
- NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - N Al-Daghri
- Chair for Biomarkers of Chronic Diseases, Biochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - E Biver
- Division of Bone Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - M L Brandi
- FirmoLab, Fondazione FIRMO e Università di Firenze, Florence, Italy
| | - O Bruyère
- Division of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Liège, Belgium and WHO Collaborating Centre for Public Health Aspects of Musculoskeletal Health and Aging, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium
| | - N Burlet
- Global Head of Patient Insights Innovation, Patient Solution Unit, Sanofi, Lyon, France
| | - C Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - B Cortet
- Department of Rheumatology and EA 4490, University-Hospital of Lille, Lille, France
| | - E Dennison
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - A Diez-Perez
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, IMIM-Parc Salut Mar, CIBERFES, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Gasparik
- Department of Public Health, University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures, Targu Mures, Romania
| | - A Grosso
- Patient partner, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - P Hadji
- Frankfurt Centre of Bone Health, Frankfurt, Germany & Philips-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - P Halbout
- International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland
| | - J A Kanis
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
- Mary McKillop Health Institute, Catholic University of Australia, Melbourne, Australia
| | - J M Kaufman
- Department of Endocrinology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - A Laslop
- Scientific Office, Austrian Federal Office for Safety in Health Care, Vienna, Austria
| | - S Maggi
- CNR Aging Branch-NI, Padua, Italy
| | - R Rizzoli
- Division of Bone Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - T Thomas
- Department of Rheumatology, Hôpital Nord, CHU Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne and INSERM U1059, Université de Lyon-Université Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - S Tuzun
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, İstanbul University Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - M Vlaskovska
- Medical Faculty, Department of Pharmacology, Medical University Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - J Y Reginster
- Chair for Biomarkers of Chronic Diseases, Biochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Division of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Liège, Belgium and WHO Collaborating Centre for Public Health Aspects of Musculoskeletal Health and Aging, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hiligsmann M, Reginster JY, Tosteson ANA, Bukata SV, Saag KG, Gold DT, Halbout P, Jiwa F, Lewiecki EM, Pinto D, Adachi JD, Al-Daghri N, Bruyère O, Chandran M, Cooper C, Harvey NC, Einhorn TA, Kanis JA, Kendler DL, Messina OD, Rizzoli R, Si L, Silverman S. Recommendations for the conduct of economic evaluations in osteoporosis: outcomes of an experts' consensus meeting organized by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) and the US branch of the International Osteoporosis Foundation. Osteoporos Int 2019; 30:45-57. [PMID: 30382319 PMCID: PMC6331734 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-018-4744-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Accepted: 10/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Economic evaluations are increasingly used to assess the value of health interventions, but variable quality and heterogeneity limit the use of these evaluations by decision-makers. These recommendations provide guidance for the design, conduct, and reporting of economic evaluations in osteoporosis to improve their transparency, comparability, and methodologic standards. INTRODUCTION This paper aims to provide recommendations for the conduct of economic evaluations in osteoporosis in order to improve their transparency, comparability, and methodologic standards. METHODS A working group was convened by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis to make recommendations for the design, conduct, and reporting of economic evaluations in osteoporosis, to define an osteoporosis-specific reference case to serve a minimum standard for all economic analyses in osteoporosis, to discuss methodologic challenges and initiate a call for research. A literature review, a face-to-face meeting in New York City (including 11 experts), and a review/approval by a larger group of experts worldwide (including 23 experts in total) were conducted. RESULTS Recommendations on the type of economic evaluation, methods for economic evaluation, modeling aspects, base-case analysis and population, excess mortality, fracture costs and disutility, treatment characteristics, and model validation were provided. Recommendations for reporting economic evaluations in osteoporosis were also made and an osteoporosis-specific checklist was designed that includes items to report when performing an economic evaluation in osteoporosis. Further, 12 minimum criteria for economic evaluations in osteoporosis were identified and 12 methodologic challenges and need for further research were discussed. CONCLUSION While the working group acknowledges challenges and the need for further research, these recommendations are intended to supplement general and national guidelines for economic evaluations, improve transparency, quality, and comparability of economic evaluations in osteoporosis, and maintain methodologic standards to increase their use by decision-makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - J-Y Reginster
- Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
- Chair for Biomarkers of Chronic Diseases, Biochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - A N A Tosteson
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - S V Bukata
- UCLA Orthopaedic Center, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - K G Saag
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - D T Gold
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - P Halbout
- International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland
| | - F Jiwa
- Patients Societies at the International Osteoporosis Foundation, Osteoporosis Canada, Toronto, Canada
| | - E M Lewiecki
- New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - D Pinto
- Department of Physical Therapy, Marquette University, Milwaukee, USA
- Center for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
| | - J D Adachi
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - N Al-Daghri
- Chair for Biomarkers of Chronic Diseases, Biochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - O Bruyère
- Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - M Chandran
- Osteoporosis and Bone Metabolism Unit, Department of Endocrinology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - C Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- UKNIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - N C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - T A Einhorn
- New York University Langone Health, New York, USA
| | - J A Kanis
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
- Mary McKillop Health Institute, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - D L Kendler
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - O D Messina
- Cosme Argerich Hospital and IRO medical research centre, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - R Rizzoli
- Service of Bone Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - L Si
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NH, Australia
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - S Silverman
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, UCLA School of Medicine and the OMC Clinical Research Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
UNLABELLED To achieve blood supply, EFS organizes mobile blood collection sessions (80% of whole blood supply), close to target blood donors. Mobile sessions planning is usually developed in partnership with organizations of voluntary blood donors, based on the experience of previous sessions. However, population moving to urban areas and lifestyles changing force to focus on objective demographic analysis to determine a prospective vision of potentialities to ensure blood supply. METHOD For blood supply management, EFS recently implemented innovative methods of mapping, through Geographic Information System software (GIS) that allow a spatial representation of different indicators. Geomatics engineering gathers and processes spatially referenced information about blood collections and blood donors, combining data from EFS and data from IGN or INSEE. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION The authors present some examples of geomatics applied to blood supply and a feedback on the implementation of these tools in a French region. These innovative tools enhance expertise and increase the mastery of analysis for blood supply strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Halbout
- Établissement français du sang Pays-de-la-Loire, centre hospitalier départementale les Oudairies, site de La Roche-sur-Yon, 85925 La Roche-sur-Yon cedex 9, France.
| | - J P Lebaudy
- Établissement français du sang Bretagne, rue Pierre-Jean-Gineste, 35016 Rennes cedex, France
| | - F Gagneux
- Établissement français du sang Bretagne, rue Pierre-Jean-Gineste, 35016 Rennes cedex, France
| | - N Brosius
- Établissement français du sang, services Centraux, 20, avenue Stade-de-France, 93200 Saint-Denis, France
| | - B Pelletier
- Établissement français du sang, services Centraux, 20, avenue Stade-de-France, 93200 Saint-Denis, France
| | - B Danic
- Établissement français du sang Bretagne, rue Pierre-Jean-Gineste, 35016 Rennes cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Halbout P, Chenus F, Sauton D, Pelletier B, Meunier F, Krikorian C, Assal A. Géomarketing des collectes mobiles et des donneurs de l’EFS Aquitaine Limousin : une expérience sur trois années. Transfus Clin Biol 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tracli.2013.04.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
16
|
|
17
|
Hojjat-Assari S, Leger J, François A, Legrand D, Bardiaux L, Schuhmacher A, Halbout P, Giraudeau B, Binda D, Monnet E, Bierling P. Impact du vieillissement de la population sur la consommation de concentrés de globules rouges (CGR) en France : périodes 2002–2010, 2011–2020. Transfus Clin Biol 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tracli.2013.03.142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
18
|
Halbout P, Marquer F, Huet J, Dupont S, Pelletier B. Recrutement de donneurs de sang de phénotype rare : contribution du géomarketing. Transfus Clin Biol 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tracli.2013.03.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
19
|
Atkins GJ, Welldon KJ, Halbout P, Findlay DM. Strontium ranelate treatment of human primary osteoblasts promotes an osteocyte-like phenotype while eliciting an osteoprotegerin response. Osteoporos Int 2009; 20:653-64. [PMID: 18763010 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-008-0728-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2008] [Accepted: 07/21/2008] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
SUMMARY The effect of strontium ranelate (SR) on human osteoblast differentiation was tested. SR induced osteoblastic proliferation, in vitro mineralization, and increased the expression of osteocyte markers. SR also elicited an osteoprotegerin (OPG) secretory response. We conclude that SR promotes the osteoblast maturation and osteocyte differentiation while promoting an additional antiresorptive effect. INTRODUCTION SR is a new treatment for osteoporosis that reduces the risk of hip and vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women. This study sought to investigate the extent, to which SR modulates human osteoblast differentiation. METHODS Adult human primary osteoblasts (NHBC) were exposed to SR under mineralizing conditions in long-term cultures. Osteoblast differentiation status was investigated by cell-surface phenotypic analysis. Expression of genes associated with osteoblast/osteocyte differentiation was examined using real-time RT-PCR. Secreted OPG was assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS SR significantly increased osteoblast replication. SR time- and dose-dependently induced an osteocyte-like phenotype, as determined by cell surface alkaline phosphatase and STRO-1 expression. SR at 5 mM or greater dramatically increased in vitro mineralization. In parallel, mRNA levels of dentin matrix protein (DMP)-1 and sclerostin were higher under SR treatment, strongly suggestive of the presence of osteocytes. SR also increased the OPG/RANKL ratio throughout the culture period, consistent with an effect to inhibit osteoblast-induced osteoclastogenesis. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that SR can promote osteoblast maturation and an osteocyte-like phenotype. Coupled with its effect on the OPG/RANKL system, these findings are consistent with in vivo effects in patients receiving SR for the treatment of osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G J Atkins
- Bone Cell Biology Group, Discipline of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Adelaide and Hanson Institute, Adelaide, Australia.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Foudrinier F, Aubert D, Puygauthier-Toubas D, Rouger C, Beguinot I, Halbout P, Lemaire P, Marx-Chemla C, Pinon JM. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii in immunodeficient subjects by gene amplification: influence of therapeutics. Scand J Infect Dis 1996; 28:383-6. [PMID: 8893403 DOI: 10.3109/00365549609037924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology was used to detect Toxoplasma gondii DNA in 253 immunodeficient subjects, 179 of whom were infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The incidence of toxoplasmosis was 12.3% (22/179) in the HIV-infected subjects and 2.7% (2/74) in the remainder. The sensitivity of the PCR during episodes of toxoplasmosis in HIV-infected subjects not on antiparasitic treatment was 86.6% on peripheral blood and 60% on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), but was only 25% and 16.7%, respectively, in subjects receiving specific treatment or prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii. Among the HIV-seronegative population, six patients undergoing anticancer chemotherapy were PCR positive on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid but did not develop pulmonary toxoplasmosis, suggesting transient carriage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Foudrinier
- Laboratoire de Parasitologie, Hôpital Maison Blanche, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|