Interinstitutional clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction

INTRODUCTION

Mexico has the highest 30-day mortality due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI), which constitutes one of the main causes of mortality in the country: 28 % versus 7.5 % on average for the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries.

OBJECTIVE

To establish critical pathways and essential interinstitutional pharmacological strategies for the care of patients with AMI in Mexico, regardless of their socioeconomic status.

METHOD

A group of experts in AMI diagnosis and treatment, representatives of the main public health institutions in Mexico, as well as the Mexican cardiology societies, the Mexican Red Cross and representatives of the Spanish Society of Cardiology, were brought together in order to optimize strategies based on the best existing evidence.

RESULTS

An interinstitutional clinical practice guideline was designed for early diagnosis and timely treatment of AMI with ST-segment elevation, following the clinical horizon of the disease, with the proposal of algorithms that improve the prognosis of patients who attend the emergency services due to an AMI.

CONCLUSION

With these clinical practice guidelines, the group of experts proposes to universalize AMI diagnosis and treatment, regardless of patient socioeconomic status.

INTRODUCCIÓN

México tiene la mortalidad más alta a 30 días por infarto agudo de miocardio (IAM), el cual constituye una de las principales causas de mortalidad en el país: 28 % versus 7.5 % del promedio de los países de la Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos.

OBJETIVO

Establecer las rutas críticas y las estrategias farmacológicas esenciales interinstitucionales para la atención de los pacientes con IAM en México, independientemente de su condición socioeconómica.

MÉTODO

Se reunió a un grupo de expertos en diagnóstico y tratamiento de IAM, representantes de las principales instituciones públicas de salud de México, así como las sociedades cardiológicas mexicanas, Cruz Roja Mexicana y representantes de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología con la finalidad de optimizar las estrategias con base en la mejor evidencia existente.

RESULTADOS

Se diseñó una guía de práctica clínica interinstitucional para el diagnóstico temprano y tratamiento oportuno del IAM con elevación del segmento ST, siguiendo el horizonte clínico de la enfermedad, con la propuesta de algoritmos que mejoren el pronóstico de los pacientes que acuden por IAM a los servicios de urgencias.

CONCLUSIÓN

Con la presente guía práctica, el grupo de expertos propone universalizar el diagnóstico y tratamiento en el IAM, independientemente de la condición socioeconómica del paciente.

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

INTRODUCTION

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is a promising treatment modality for ischemic heart disease including myocardial infarction where outcomes are frequently poor despite early revascularization.

OBJECTIVE

To compare single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) findings in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with HBOT vs. control at 6 weeks.

METHODS

In this pilot study, 24 patients were randomly allocated to HBOT (n = 13) and control groups (n = 11). Both groups underwent PPCI and were treated following the guidelines for STEMI management. The HBOT group received additional 15 and 90-minute HBOT sessions. All participants underwent SPECT at initial presentation (within 48 h of PPCI) and at follow up.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. The number of affected SPECT segments in the HBOT group at baseline and 6 weeks were 47.1 ± 14.6% vs. 33.7 ± 16.2%, respectively, with p = 0.039, and in the control group, the number of affected segment at these times were 55.5 ± 19.5% vs. 45.9 ± 17.9%, respectively, with p = 0.090. At follow-up, a decrease in the summed rest score was noted in both groups (HBOT: 20 ± 6.0 vs. 12.7 ± 8.1; p = 0.0017; control: 23 ± 8.2 vs. 16.7 ± 6.6; p = 0.031). The left ventricular ejection fraction in the HBOT group improved from 44 ± 22.1% to 57.2 ± 15.4% (p = 0.011) and in the control group from 45.9 ± 18.2% to 55 ± 12.1% (p = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

HBOT use in STEMI patients was associated with an improvement in perfusion and an increase in ejection fraction following PPCI. These observations warrant a larger randomized clinical trial.

Initial experience in Mexico with the Evolut™ R valve with direct aortic Access

Background

Aortic stenosis (AS) is one of the most frequent valvulopathies in elderly patients. The treatment for AS is heart surgery; however, many patients do not benefit from this treatment because they are considered to be at high surgical or inoperable risk. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was developed for these patients.

Objective

To disseminate the feasibility and safety of other access routes for the implantation of transcatheter aortic valves and that it can also be performed in the hemodynamic laboratory. In addition to the rapid growth in technology and knowledge, there is a lot of experience with TAVI already.

Methodology

One of the limitations is the diameter of the femoral, subclavian, and axillary vascular accesses. This is why other approaches such as the direct aortic approach are sought after, despite the invasive nature of mini-thoracotomy and aortotomy is technically feasible, familiar, and easy to learn for cardiac surgeons.

Results

In addition, it has been associated with favorable outcomes and a lower rate of complications (bleeding and risk of myocardial injury) and shorter length of stay in the intensive care unit compared to surgery or transapical access.

Conclusions

Our center successfully implanted the self-expandable aortic valve Evolut™ through direct aortic for presenting a dissection in transverse aorta with possibilities of embolization.

Experiencia inicial en México con la prótesis aórtica transcatéter Evolut™ R por abordaje aórtico directo

Background

Aortic stenosis is one of the most frequent valvulopathies in the elderly patient. The treatment for aortic stenosis is heart surgery, however many patients do not benefit from this treatment because they are considered to be at high surgical or inoperable risk. Transcatheter aortic valve (TAVI) was developed for these patients.

Objective

To make known the feasibility and safety of other access routes for the implantation of transcatheter aortic valves and that it can also be performed in the hemodynamic laboratory. In addition to rapid growth in technology and know-how, TAVI is already very experienced.

Methodology

One of the limitations is the diameter of the femoral, subclavian, and axillary vascular accesses. This is why other approaches such as the direct aortic approach are sought, despite the invasive nature of mini-thoracotomy and aortotomy is technically feasible, familiar and easy to learn for cardiac surgeons.

Results

In addition, it has been associated with favorable outcomes and a lower rate of complications (bleeding, risk of myocardial injury) and shorter length of stay in the Intensive Care Unit compared to surgery or transapical access.

Conclusion

Our center successfully implanted the self-expandable aortic valve Evolut™ via direct aortic for presenting a dissection in transverse aorta with possibilities of embolization.

[Experience of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the Central Military Hospital]

OBJECTIVE

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an alternative treatment for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, inoperable or at high surgical risk. The purpose of this communication is to report the results of the experience of this new technique and compare them with literature.

METHODS

Review of 17 patients data with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at high surgical risk or inoperable, treated with a transcatheter implantation aortic valve (TAVI) via femoral surgical access with Core Valve (Medtronic, EE.UU.) between September 2013 and July 2014.

RESULTS

All patients had severe aortic stenosis with a mean gradient of 46̊æ14 mmHg received CoreValveTM (Medtronic, USA). Half of patients was performed under general anesthesia, the other half with regional and local anesthesia. In-hospital mortality was 11.7% and one death in follow-up from September 2013 until the time of preparing this report (5.9%).Total mortality at one year follow-up was 17.6%. The technical success rate was 82.4%, with an immediate post-implantation gradient of 5.4̊æ3.4 mmHg. Aortic regurgitation I degree was observed in 5 patients (29.4%); 2 patients (11.7%) had aortic regurgitation grade II. Post dilatation was made in 6 patients (35.2%). We did not have any vascular complications. Permanent pacemaker implantation was needed in 6 patients (35.2%). One patient complicated with acute renal failure, 2 had in-hospital ischemic stroke (11.7%), none had need for cardiac surgery; 2 patients had major bleeding complications that required transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with high surgical risk or inoperable, TAVI is a treatment option that improves life quality, survival and diminsh the need of hospitalizations. There can be some complications and even death, so that a proper patient selection and a multidisciplinary team is needed and fundamental for a successful procedure.