1
|
Debatin NF, Bady E, Mandelkow T, Huang Z, Lurati MCJ, Raedler JB, Müller JH, Vettorazzi E, Plage H, Samtleben H, Klatte T, Hofbauer S, Elezkurtaj S, Furlano K, Weinberger S, Giacomo Bruch P, Horst D, Roßner F, Schallenberg S, Marx AH, Fisch M, Rink M, Slojewski M, Kaczmarek K, Ecke TH, Hallmann S, Koch S, Adamini N, Lennartz M, Minner S, Simon R, Sauter G, Zecha H, Schlomm T, Blessin NC. Prognostic Impact and Spatial Interplay of Immune Cells in Urothelial Cancer. Eur Urol 2024:S0302-2838(24)00065-4. [PMID: 38383257 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.01.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quantity and the spatial relationship of specific immune cell types can provide prognostic information in bladder cancer. OBJECTIVE To characterize the spatial interplay and prognostic role of different immune cell subpopulations in bladder cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A total of 2463 urothelial bladder carcinomas were immunostained with 21 antibodies using BLEACH&STAIN multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemistry in a tissue microarray format and analyzed using a framework of neuronal networks for an image analysis. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Spatial immune parameters were compared with histopathological parameters and overall survival data. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The identification of > 300 different immune cell subpopulations and the characterization of their spatial relationship resulted in numerous spatial interaction patterns. Thirty-nine immune parameters showed prognostic significance in univariate analyses, of which 16 were independent from pT, pN, and histological grade in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Among all these parameters, the strongest association with prolonged overall survival was identified for intraepithelial CD8+ cytotoxic T cells (time-dependent area under receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]: 0.70), while stromal CD8+ T cells were less relevant (AUC: 0.65). A favorable prognosis of inflamed cancers with high levels of "exhaustion markers" suggests that TIM3, PD-L1, PD-1, and CTLA-4 on immune cells do not hinder antitumoral immune response in tumors rich of tumor infiltrating immune cells. CONCLUSIONS The density of intraepithelial CD8+ T cells was the strongest prognostic feature in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Given that tumor cell killing by CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes through direct cell-to-cell-contacts represents the "terminal end route" of antitumor immunity, the quantity of "tumor cell adjacent CD8+ T cells" may constitute a surrogate for the efficiency of cancer recognition by the immune system that can be measured straightaway in routine pathology as the CD8 labeling index. PATIENT SUMMARY Quantification of intraepithelial CD8+ T cells, the strongest prognostic feature identified in muscle-invasive bladder cancer, can easily be assessed by brightfield immunohistochemistry and is therefore "ready to use" for routine pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolaus F Debatin
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Elena Bady
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tim Mandelkow
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Zhihao Huang
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Magalie C J Lurati
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jonas B Raedler
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; College of Arts and Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jan H Müller
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Eik Vettorazzi
- Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Henning Plage
- Department of Urology, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Henrik Samtleben
- Department of Pathology, Academic Hospital Fuerth, Fuerth, Germany
| | - Tobias Klatte
- Department of Urology, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Helios Hospital Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | | | | | - Kira Furlano
- Department of Urology, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - David Horst
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Andreas H Marx
- Department of Pathology, Academic Hospital Fuerth, Fuerth, Germany
| | - Margit Fisch
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marcin Slojewski
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Stettin, Stettin, Poland
| | | | - Thorsten H Ecke
- Department of Urology, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Helios Hospital Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | - Steffen Hallmann
- Department of Urology, Helios Hospital Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | - Stefan Koch
- Department of Pathology, Helios Hospital Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | - Nico Adamini
- Department of Urology, Albertinen Hospital, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Lennartz
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Minner
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ronald Simon
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Guido Sauter
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Henrik Zecha
- Department of Urology, Albertinen Hospital, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Niclas C Blessin
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schallenberg S, Plage H, Hofbauer S, Furlano K, Weinberger S, Bruch PG, Roßner F, Elezkurtaj S, Kluth M, Lennartz M, Blessin NC, Marx AH, Samtleben H, Fisch M, Rink M, Slojewski M, Kaczmarek K, Ecke T, Hallmann S, Koch S, Adamini N, Minner S, Simon R, Sauter G, Horst D, Klatte T, Schlomm T, Zecha H. Altered p53/p16 expression is linked to urothelial carcinoma progression but largely unrelated to prognosis in muscle-invasive tumors. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1880-1889. [PMID: 37938166 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2277344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most inactivating p53 mutations result in a nuclear p53 accumulation - detectable by immunohistochemistry (IHC). p53 alterations leading to a complete lack of p53 protein and absence of immunostaining do also occur - not easily detectable by IHC. p16 is upregulated in p53 inactivated cells. We hypothesized that a positive p16 IHC may help to distinguish p53 inactivation in IHC negative cases. MATERIAL AND METHODS We investigated p53 and p16 immunostaining on 2710 urothelial bladder carcinomas in a tissue microarray format to understand their impact in relation to clinicopathological parameters of disease progression and patient outcome. RESULTS p16 immunostaining was absent in normal urothelium but occurred in 63.5% (30.4% strong) of cancers. p16 strongly positive cases increased from pTaG2 low-grade (9.6%) to pTaG3 high-grade tumors (46.5%, p < .0001) but decreased from pTaG3 to pT4 (33.3%; p = .0030). Among pT2-4 carcinomas, p16 positivity was linked to high-grade (p = .0005) but unrelated to overall survival. p53 staining was negative in 8.4%, very weak in 15.4%, weak in 55.3%, strong in 4.7%, and very strong in 16.2% cancers. p53 negative (potentially p53 null phenotype), strong, and very strong p53 positivity increased from pTaG2 low-grade to pTaG3 high-grade tumors (p < .0001) and from pTaG3 to pT2-4 cancers (p = .0007). p53 staining was largely unrelated to histopathological parameters or patient prognosis among pT2-4 carcinomas, except of p53 strong/very strong immunostaining. p16 expression predominated in tumors with very strong, strong, and negative p53 staining and the combination of p53 negative/p16 strongly positive cancers was linked to features of tumor aggressiveness. CONCLUSION Aberrant p53 and p16 immunostaining increases during grade and stage progression although p53 negative and p16 positive immunostaining lack prognostic significance in pT2-4 carcinomas. Potential diagnostic features are that high level p16 expression is limited to neoplastic urothelium and p53 null phenotype to aggressive cancers (grade 3 and invasive).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Henning Plage
- Department of Urology, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Kira Furlano
- Department of Urology, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Martina Kluth
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Lennartz
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Niclas C Blessin
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andreas H Marx
- Department of Pathology, Academic Hospital Fuerth, Fuerth, Germany
| | - Henrik Samtleben
- Department of Pathology, Academic Hospital Fuerth, Fuerth, Germany
| | - Margit Fisch
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, Marienhospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marcin Slojewski
- Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Krystian Kaczmarek
- Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Thorsten Ecke
- Department of Urology, Helios Hospital Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | - Steffen Hallmann
- Department of Urology, Helios Hospital Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | - Stefan Koch
- Department of Pathology, Helios Hospital Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | - Nico Adamini
- Department of Urology, Albertinen Hospital, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Minner
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ronald Simon
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Guido Sauter
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - David Horst
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tobias Klatte
- Department of Urology, Helios Hospital Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | | | - Henrik Zecha
- Department of Urology, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Urology, Albertinen Hospital, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bruch PG, Plage H, Hofbauer S, Kornienko K, Weinberger S, Roßner F, Schallenberg S, Kluth M, Lennartz M, Blessin NC, Marx AH, Samtleben H, Fisch M, Rink M, Slojewski M, Kaczmarek K, Ecke T, Hallmann S, Koch S, Adamini N, Minner S, Simon R, Sauter G, Zecha H, Klatte T, Schlomm T, Horst D, Elezkurtaj S. Cytokeratin 20 expression is linked to stage progression and to poor prognosis in advanced (pT4) urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Exp Mol Pathol 2023; 131:104860. [PMID: 36997051 DOI: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2023.104860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023]
Abstract
Cytokeratin 20 (CK20) expression is limited to umbrella cells in the normal urothelium. Since CK20 is often upregulated in neoplastic urothelial cells including dysplasia and carcinoma in situ, immunohistochemical CK20 analysis is often used for the assessment of bladder biopsies. CK20 expression is a feature of luminal bladder cancer subtype, but its prognostic relevance is disputed. In this study, we investigated CK20 on >2700 urothelial bladder carcinomas in a tissue microarray format by immunohistochemistry. Cytoplasmic and membranous CK20 staining was seen in 1319 (51.8%) cancers. The fraction of CK20 positive and especially strongly positive cases increased from pTaG2 low grade (44.5% strongly positive) and pTaG2 high grade (57.7%) to pTaG3 high grade (62.3%; p = 0.0006) but was lower in muscle-invasive (pT2-4) carcinomas (51.1% in all pTa vs. 29.6% in pT2-4; p < 0.0001). Within pT2-4 carcinomas, CK20 positivity was linked to nodal metastasis and lymphatic vessel invasion (p < 0.0001 each) and to venous invasion (p = 0.0177). CK20 staining was unrelated to overall patient survival if all 605 pT2-4 carcinomas were jointly analyzed but subgroup analyses revealed a significant association of CK20 positivity with favorable prognosis in 129 pT4 carcinomas (p = 0.0005). CK20 positivity was strongly linked to the expression of GATA3 (p < 0.0001), another feature of luminal bladder cancer. The combined analysis of both parameters showed best prognosis for luminal A (CK20+/GATA3+, CK20+/GATA3-) and worst outcome for luminal B (CK20-/GATA3+) and basal/squamous (CK20-/GATA3-) in pT4 urothelial carcinomas (p = 0.0005). In summary, the results of our study demonstrate a complex role of CK20 expression in urothelial neoplasms including neoexpression in pTa tumors, a subsequent loss of CK20 expression in a subset of tumors progressing to muscle-invasion, and a stage dependent prognostic role in muscle-invasive cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Giacomo Bruch
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Henning Plage
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Hofbauer
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kira Kornienko
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sarah Weinberger
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Florian Roßner
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Simon Schallenberg
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Martina Kluth
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Lennartz
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Niclas C Blessin
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andreas H Marx
- Department of Pathology, Academic Hospital Fuerth, Fuerth, Germany
| | - Henrik Samtleben
- Department of Pathology, Academic Hospital Fuerth, Fuerth, Germany
| | - Margit Fisch
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marcin Slojewski
- Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Krystian Kaczmarek
- Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Thorsten Ecke
- Department of Urology, Helios Hospital Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | - Steffen Hallmann
- Department of Urology, Helios Hospital Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | - Stefan Koch
- Department of Pathology, Helios Hospital Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | - Nico Adamini
- Department of Urology, Albertinen Hospital, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Minner
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ronald Simon
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Guido Sauter
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Henrik Zecha
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Albertinen Hospital, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Klatte
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thorsten Schlomm
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Horst
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sefer Elezkurtaj
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Plage H, Samtleben H, Hofbauer S, Kornienko K, Weinberger S, Bruch PG, Elezkurtaj S, Roßner F, Schallenberg S, Kluth M, Lennartz M, Blessin NC, Marx AH, Fisch M, Rink M, Slojewski M, Kaczmarek K, Ecke T, Hallmann S, Koch S, Adamini N, Minner S, Simon R, Sauter G, Klatte T, Schlomm T, Horst D, Zecha H. GATA3 expression loss is linked to stage progression but is unrelated to prognosis in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Hum Pathol 2022; 130:10-17. [PMID: 36152841 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2022.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The transcription factor GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3) is commonly used in surgical pathology as a diagnostic marker to distinguish urothelial carcinomas from other cancer entities. However, the clinical relevance of GATA3 expression in urothelial bladder cancer is not completely clarified. In this study, we investigated GATA3 immunostaining on 2710 urothelial bladder carcinomas on a tissue microarray platform by using two different antibodies to better understand its impact in relation to pathological parameters of disease progression and patient outcome. Nuclear GATA3 immunostaining was regularly seen in normal urothelium and found in 74%/82% of interpretable urothelial neoplasms depending on the antibody used. Within pTa tumors, the rate of GATA3 positive tumors decreased with advancing grade. GATA3 positivity was seen in 98.6%/99.8% of pTaG2 low-grade, 98.6%/100% of pTaG2 high-grade, and 94.9%/99.2% of pTaG3 high-grade tumors (P = .0002). As compared to pTa tumors, GATA3 positivity was markedly less common in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (59.9%/71.6%; P < .0001). Within pT2-4 cancers, high-level GATA3 immunostaining was associated with the presence of lymph node metastasis (P = .0034), and blood vessel (P = .0290) or lymphatic invasion (P = .0005) but unrelated to pT stage. GATA3 immunostaining results for both antibodies were not associated with overall survival in 586 patients treated by cystectomy for pT2-4 urothelial carcinoma. The results of our study identify GATA3 expression as a frequent event in noninvasive urothelial carcinomas with favorable tumor features. Loss of GATA3 immunostaining is linked with muscle-invasive disease but is largely unrelated to pathological parameters and patient prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henning Plage
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Henrik Samtleben
- Department of Pathology, Academic Hospital Fuerth, 90766 Fuerth, Germany
| | - Sebastian Hofbauer
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Kira Kornienko
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Sarah Weinberger
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul Giacomo Bruch
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Sefer Elezkurtaj
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Florian Roßner
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Simon Schallenberg
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Martina Kluth
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Lennartz
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Niclas C Blessin
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andreas H Marx
- Department of Pathology, Academic Hospital Fuerth, 90766 Fuerth, Germany
| | - Margit Fisch
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marcin Slojewski
- Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczeci, Poland
| | - Krystian Kaczmarek
- Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczeci, Poland
| | - Thorsten Ecke
- Department of Urology, Helios Hospital Bad Saarow, 15526 Bad Saarow, Germany
| | - Steffen Hallmann
- Department of Urology, Helios Hospital Bad Saarow, 15526 Bad Saarow, Germany
| | - Stefan Koch
- Department of Pathology, Helios Hospital Bad Saarow, 15526 Bad Saarow, Germany
| | - Nico Adamini
- Department of Urology, Albertinen Hospital, 22457 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Minner
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ronald Simon
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Guido Sauter
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Klatte
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Thorsten Schlomm
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - David Horst
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Henrik Zecha
- Department of Urology, Albertinen Hospital, 22457 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|