1
|
Isaksson LJ, Summers P, Mastroleo F, Marvaso G, Corrao G, Vincini MG, Zaffaroni M, Ceci F, Petralia G, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Automatic Segmentation with Deep Learning in Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4389. [PMID: 37686665 PMCID: PMC10486603 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
This review provides a formal overview of current automatic segmentation studies that use deep learning in radiotherapy. It covers 807 published papers and includes multiple cancer sites, image types (CT/MRI/PET), and segmentation methods. We collect key statistics about the papers to uncover commonalities, trends, and methods, and identify areas where more research might be needed. Moreover, we analyzed the corpus by posing explicit questions aimed at providing high-quality and actionable insights, including: "What should researchers think about when starting a segmentation study?", "How can research practices in medical image segmentation be improved?", "What is missing from the current corpus?", and more. This allowed us to provide practical guidelines on how to conduct a good segmentation study in today's competitive environment that will be useful for future research within the field, regardless of the specific radiotherapeutic subfield. To aid in our analysis, we used the large language model ChatGPT to condense information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Johannes Isaksson
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.J.I.); (F.M.); (G.C.); (M.G.V.); (M.Z.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (F.C.); (G.P.)
| | - Paul Summers
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Federico Mastroleo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.J.I.); (F.M.); (G.C.); (M.G.V.); (M.Z.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale (UPO), 20188 Novara, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.J.I.); (F.M.); (G.C.); (M.G.V.); (M.Z.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Giulia Corrao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.J.I.); (F.M.); (G.C.); (M.G.V.); (M.Z.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Maria Giulia Vincini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.J.I.); (F.M.); (G.C.); (M.G.V.); (M.Z.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.J.I.); (F.M.); (G.C.); (M.G.V.); (M.Z.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (F.C.); (G.P.)
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (F.C.); (G.P.)
- Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.J.I.); (F.M.); (G.C.); (M.G.V.); (M.Z.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (F.C.); (G.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Isaksson LJ, Pepa M, Summers P, Zaffaroni M, Vincini MG, Corrao G, Mazzola GC, Rotondi M, Lo Presti G, Raimondi S, Gandini S, Volpe S, Haron Z, Alessi S, Pricolo P, Mistretta FA, Luzzago S, Cattani F, Musi G, Cobelli OD, Cremonesi M, Orecchia R, Marvaso G, Petralia G, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Comparison of automated segmentation techniques for magnetic resonance images of the prostate. BMC Med Imaging 2023; 23:32. [PMID: 36774463 PMCID: PMC9921124 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-023-00974-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Contouring of anatomical regions is a crucial step in the medical workflow and is both time-consuming and prone to intra- and inter-observer variability. This study compares different strategies for automatic segmentation of the prostate in T2-weighted MRIs. METHODS This study included 100 patients diagnosed with prostate adenocarcinoma who had undergone multi-parametric MRI and prostatectomy. From the T2-weighted MR images, ground truth segmentation masks were established by consensus from two expert radiologists. The prostate was then automatically contoured with six different methods: (1) a multi-atlas algorithm, (2) a proprietary algorithm in the Syngo.Via medical imaging software, and four deep learning models: (3) a V-net trained from scratch, (4) a pre-trained 2D U-net, (5) a GAN extension of the 2D U-net, and (6) a segmentation-adapted EfficientDet architecture. The resulting segmentations were compared and scored against the ground truth masks with one 70/30 and one 50/50 train/test data split. We also analyzed the association between segmentation performance and clinical variables. RESULTS The best performing method was the adapted EfficientDet (model 6), achieving a mean Dice coefficient of 0.914, a mean absolute volume difference of 5.9%, a mean surface distance (MSD) of 1.93 pixels, and a mean 95th percentile Hausdorff distance of 3.77 pixels. The deep learning models were less prone to serious errors (0.854 minimum Dice and 4.02 maximum MSD), and no significant relationship was found between segmentation performance and clinical variables. CONCLUSIONS Deep learning-based segmentation techniques can consistently achieve Dice coefficients of 0.9 or above with as few as 50 training patients, regardless of architectural archetype. The atlas-based and Syngo.via methods found in commercial clinical software performed significantly worse (0.855[Formula: see text]0.887 Dice).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Johannes Isaksson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Matteo Pepa
- grid.15667.330000 0004 1757 0843Department of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paul Summers
- grid.15667.330000 0004 1757 0843Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Maria Giulia Vincini
- grid.15667.330000 0004 1757 0843Department of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Corrao
- grid.15667.330000 0004 1757 0843Department of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Carlo Mazzola
- grid.15667.330000 0004 1757 0843Department of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy ,grid.4708.b0000 0004 1757 2822Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Rotondi
- grid.15667.330000 0004 1757 0843Department of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy ,grid.4708.b0000 0004 1757 2822Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuliana Lo Presti
- grid.15667.330000 0004 1757 0843Molecular and Pharmaco-Epidemiology Unit, Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Raimondi
- grid.15667.330000 0004 1757 0843Molecular and Pharmaco-Epidemiology Unit, Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Gandini
- grid.15667.330000 0004 1757 0843Molecular and Pharmaco-Epidemiology Unit, Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Volpe
- grid.15667.330000 0004 1757 0843Department of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy ,grid.4708.b0000 0004 1757 2822Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Zaharudin Haron
- grid.459841.50000 0004 6017 2701Radiology Department, National Cancer Institute, Putrajaya, Malaysia
| | - Sarah Alessi
- grid.15667.330000 0004 1757 0843Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Pricolo
- grid.15667.330000 0004 1757 0843Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Alessandro Mistretta
- grid.4708.b0000 0004 1757 2822Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy ,grid.15667.330000 0004 1757 0843Division of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- grid.4708.b0000 0004 1757 2822Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy ,grid.15667.330000 0004 1757 0843Division of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- grid.15667.330000 0004 1757 0843Medical Physics Unit, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- grid.4708.b0000 0004 1757 2822Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy ,grid.15667.330000 0004 1757 0843Division of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- grid.4708.b0000 0004 1757 2822Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy ,grid.15667.330000 0004 1757 0843Division of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Cremonesi
- grid.15667.330000 0004 1757 0843Radiation Research Unit, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- grid.15667.330000 0004 1757 0843Scientific Direction, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- grid.15667.330000 0004 1757 0843Department of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy ,grid.4708.b0000 0004 1757 2822Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- grid.4708.b0000 0004 1757 2822Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy ,grid.15667.330000 0004 1757 0843Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- grid.15667.330000 0004 1757 0843Department of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy ,grid.4708.b0000 0004 1757 2822Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Isaksson LJ, Summers P, Bhalerao A, Gandini S, Raimondi S, Pepa M, Zaffaroni M, Corrao G, Mazzola GC, Rotondi M, Lo Presti G, Haron Z, Alessi S, Pricolo P, Mistretta FA, Luzzago S, Cattani F, Musi G, De Cobelli O, Cremonesi M, Orecchia R, Marvaso G, Petralia G, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Quality assurance for automatically generated contours with additional deep learning. Insights Imaging 2022; 13:137. [PMID: 35976491 PMCID: PMC9385913 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-022-01276-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Deploying an automatic segmentation model in practice should require rigorous quality assurance (QA) and continuous monitoring of the model's use and performance, particularly in high-stakes scenarios such as healthcare. Currently, however, tools to assist with QA for such models are not available to AI researchers. In this work, we build a deep learning model that estimates the quality of automatically generated contours. METHODS The model was trained to predict the segmentation quality by outputting an estimate of the Dice similarity coefficient given an image contour pair as input. Our dataset contained 60 axial T2-weighted MRI images of prostates with ground truth segmentations along with 80 automatically generated segmentation masks. The model we used was a 3D version of the EfficientDet architecture with a custom regression head. For validation, we used a fivefold cross-validation. To counteract the limitation of the small dataset, we used an extensive data augmentation scheme capable of producing virtually infinite training samples from a single ground truth label mask. In addition, we compared the results against a baseline model that only uses clinical variables for its predictions. RESULTS Our model achieved a mean absolute error of 0.020 ± 0.026 (2.2% mean percentage error) in estimating the Dice score, with a rank correlation of 0.42. Furthermore, the model managed to correctly identify incorrect segmentations (defined in terms of acceptable/unacceptable) 99.6% of the time. CONCLUSION We believe that the trained model can be used alongside automatic segmentation tools to ensure quality and thus allow intervention to prevent undesired segmentation behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul Summers
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Abhir Bhalerao
- Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, Warwick, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Sara Gandini
- Molecular and Pharmaco-Epidemiology Unit, Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Raimondi
- Molecular and Pharmaco-Epidemiology Unit, Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Pepa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Corrao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Carlo Mazzola
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Rotondi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuliana Lo Presti
- Molecular and Pharmaco-Epidemiology Unit, Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Zaharudin Haron
- Radiology Department, National Cancer Institute, Putrajaya, Malaysia
| | - Sara Alessi
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Pricolo
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Luzzago
- Division of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Medical Physics Unit, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Division of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Division of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Cremonesi
- Radiation Research Unit, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Direction, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Garau N, Orro A, Summers P, De Maria L, Bertolotti R, Bassis D, Minotti M, De Fiori E, Baroni G, Paganelli C, Rampinelli C. Integrating Biological and Radiological Data in a Structured Repository: a Data Model Applied to the COSMOS Case Study. J Digit Imaging 2022; 35:970-982. [PMID: 35296941 PMCID: PMC9485502 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-022-00615-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Integrating the information coming from biological samples with digital data, such as medical images, has gained prominence with the advent of precision medicine. Research in this field faces an ever-increasing amount of data to manage and, as a consequence, the need to structure these data in a functional and standardized fashion to promote and facilitate cooperation among institutions. Inspired by the Minimum Information About BIobank data Sharing (MIABIS), we propose an extended data model which aims to standardize data collections where both biological and digital samples are involved. In the proposed model, strong emphasis is given to the cause-effect relationships among factors as these are frequently encountered in clinical workflows. To test the data model in a realistic context, we consider the Continuous Observation of SMOking Subjects (COSMOS) dataset as case study, consisting of 10 consecutive years of lung cancer screening and follow-up on more than 5000 subjects. The structure of the COSMOS database, implemented to facilitate the process of data retrieval, is therefore presented along with a description of data that we hope to share in a public repository for lung cancer screening research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noemi Garau
- Dipartimento Di Elettronica, Informazione E Bioingegneria, Politecnico Di Milano, Milano, Italy. .,Division of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Orro
- Institute for Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council (ITB-CNR), Segrate, Italy
| | - Paul Summers
- Division of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenza De Maria
- Division of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaella Bertolotti
- Division of Data Management, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Danny Bassis
- School of Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Minotti
- Division of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Elvio De Fiori
- Division of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Guido Baroni
- Dipartimento Di Elettronica, Informazione E Bioingegneria, Politecnico Di Milano, Milano, Italy.,Bioengineering Unit, CNAO Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Chiara Paganelli
- Dipartimento Di Elettronica, Informazione E Bioingegneria, Politecnico Di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Garau N, Paganelli C, Summers P, Bassis D, Lanza C, Minotti M, De Fiori E, Baroni G, Rampinelli C. Clinical validation of a segmentation tool for pulmonary nodules in lung cancer screening. Phys Med 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s1120-1797(22)00283-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
6
|
Summers P, Saia G, Colombo A, Pricolo P, Zugni F, Alessi S, Marvaso G, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Bellomi M, Petralia G. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging: technique, guidelines and key applications. Ecancermedicalscience 2021; 15:1164. [PMID: 33680078 PMCID: PMC7929776 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) is an imaging method without ionising radiation that can provide WB coverage with a core protocol of essential imaging contrasts in less than 40 minutes, and it can be complemented with sequences to evaluate specific body regions as needed. In many cases, WB-MRI surpasses bone scintigraphy and computed tomography in detecting and characterising lesions, evaluating their response to therapy and in screening of high-risk patients. Consequently, international guidelines now recommend the use of WB-MRI in the management of patients with multiple myeloma, prostate cancer, melanoma and individuals with certain cancer predisposition syndromes. The use of WB-MRI is also growing for metastatic breast cancer, ovarian cancer and lymphoma as well as for cancer screening amongst the general population. In light of the increasing interest from clinicians and patients in WB-MRI as a radiation-free technique for guiding the management of cancer and for cancer screening, we review its technical basis, current international guidelines for its use and key applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Summers
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Saia
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.,Advanced Screening Centers, ASC Italia, 24060 Castelli Calepio, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Alberto Colombo
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Pricolo
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Zugni
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Sarah Alessi
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Bellomi
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.,Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pizzoli SFM, Marton G, Pricolo P, Oliveri S, Summers P, Petralia G, Pravettoni G. Patients' experience with MRI-guided in-bore biopsy versus TRUS-guided biopsy in prostate cancer: a pilot study. Ecancermedicalscience 2020; 14:1127. [PMID: 33209118 PMCID: PMC7652422 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.1127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Ultrasound-guided magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-fusion biopsy and in-bore MRI-guided biopsy (MRGB) have improved the diagnostic pathway in patients with suspected prostate cancer compared to the traditional random sampling of the prostate gland under transrectal ultrasound guidance (TRUS-Bx). The aim of our study was to assess the psychological experiences of patients undergoing MRGB and TRUS-Bx. Method Participants completed an ad hoc set of 11 items to be rated from 0 (not at all) to 10 (very much) on visual analogue scales and one open question on the most worrisome aspect of the procedure. The set of items evaluated satisfaction with the information received and the possibility to ask questions to the staff; the tolerability of the irritation, duration and discomfort associated with the exam; their level of worry or calm before the exam; the perceived need to undergo the exam; their satisfaction with the exam and willingness to repeat it in the future; and acceptability of the exam. Results Between May 2018 and June 2019, 47 participants were enrolled on the day of their MRGB; 24 had previously undergone TRUS-Bx. The MRGB was rated with high positive scores on all 11 items. The lowest ratings regarded the duration of the exam (mean = 6.6) and feeling calm (mean = 6.6). Participants were significantly more satisfied with MRGB than TRUS-Bx, rating it as less painful and more comfortable, necessary and tolerable. Conclusion These preliminary results indicate that the MRGB is likely to be more tolerable and acceptable to patients than TRUS-Bx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Francesca Maria Pizzoli
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20132, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marton
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20132, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Pricolo
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20132, Italy
| | - Serena Oliveri
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20132, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Paul Summers
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20132, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Italy.,Precision Imaging and Research Unit-Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20132, Italy
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan 20132, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tartaro A, Morrone F, Calabrese A, Renzetti R, Di Pietrantonio G, De Nicola A, Bliakharskaia E, Summers P. Pilot study of empirical mathematical modeling of high temporal resolution prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. EUR UROL SUPPL 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(20)36070-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
9
|
Pepa M, Gugliandolo S, Isaksson L, Marvaso G, Raimondi S, Botta F, Gandini S, Ciardo D, Volpe S, Riva G, Rojas D, Zerini D, Pricolo P, Alessi S, Petralia G, Summers P, Mistretta A, Luzzago S, Cattani F, De Cobelli O, Cassano E, Cremonesi M, Bellomi M, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa B. PO-1576: Assessment of mpMRI-based radiomics tools in PCa for cancer aggressiveness prediction, AIRC IG-. Radiother Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)01594-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
10
|
Garau N, Paganelli C, Summers P, Choi W, Alam S, Lu W, Fanciullo C, Bellomi M, Baroni G, Rampinelli C. External validation of radiomics-based predictive models in low-dose CT screening for early lung cancer diagnosis. Med Phys 2020; 47:4125-4136. [PMID: 32488865 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Revised: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Low-dose CT screening allows early lung cancer detection, but is affected by frequent false positive results, inter/intra observer variation and uncertain diagnoses of lung nodules. Radiomics-based models have recently been introduced to overcome these issues, but limitations in demonstrating their generalizability on independent datasets are slowing their introduction to clinic. The aim of this study is to evaluate two radiomics-based models to classify malignant pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT screening, and to externally validate them on an independent cohort. The effect of a radiomics features harmonization technique is also investigated to evaluate its impact on the classification of lung nodules from a multicenter data. METHODS Pulmonary nodules from two independent cohorts were considered in this study; the first cohort (110 subjects, 113 nodules) was used to train prediction models, and the second cohort (72 nodules) to externally validate them. Literature-based radiomics features were extracted and, after feature selection, used as predictive variables in models for malignancy identification. An in-house prediction model based on artificial neural network (ANN) was implemented and evaluated, along with an alternative model from the literature, based on a support vector machine (SVM) classifier coupled with a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). External validation was performed on the second cohort to evaluate models' generalization ability. Additionally, the impact of the Combat harmonization method was investigated to compensate for multicenter datasets variabilities. A new training of the models based on harmonized features was performed on the first cohort, then tested separately on the harmonized and non-harmonized features of the second cohort. RESULTS Preliminary results showed a good accuracy of the investigated models in distinguishing benign from malignant pulmonary nodules with both sets of radiomics features (i.e., non-harmonized and harmonized). The performance of the models, quantified in terms of Area Under the Curve (AUC), was > 0.89 in the training set and > 0.82 in the external validation set for all the investigated scenarios, outperforming the clinical standard (AUC of 0.76). Slightly higher performance was observed for the SVM-LASSO model than the ANN in the external dataset, although they did not result significantly different. For both harmonized and non-harmonized features, no statistical difference was found between Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves related to training and test set for both models. CONCLUSIONS Although no significant improvements were observed when applying the Combat harmonization method, both in-house and literature-based models were able to classify lung nodules with good generalization to an independent dataset, thus showing their potential as tools for clinical decision-making in lung cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noemi Garau
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.,Division of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Paganelli
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Paul Summers
- Division of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Wookjin Choi
- Department of Engineering and Computer Science, Virginia State University, Petersburg, VA, USA
| | - Sadegh Alam
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wei Lu
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Cristiana Fanciullo
- Postgraduate School of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Bellomi
- Division of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Guido Baroni
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.,Bioengineering Unit, CNAO Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bianchini L, Botta F, Origgi D, Rizzo S, Mariani M, Summers P, García-Polo P, Cremonesi M, Lascialfari A. PETER PHAN: An MRI phantom for the optimisation of radiomic studies of the female pelvis. Phys Med 2020; 71:71-81. [PMID: 32092688 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Revised: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a phantom for methodological radiomic investigation on Magnetic Resonance (MR) images of female patients affected by pelvic cancer. METHODS A pelvis-shaped container was filled with a MnCl2 solution reproducing the relaxation times (T1, T2) of muscle surrounding pelvic malignancies. Inserts simulating multi-textured lesions were embedded in the phantom. The relaxation times of muscle and tumour were measured on an MR scanner on healthy volunteers and patients; T1 and T2 of MnCl2 solutions were evaluated with a relaxometer to find the concentrations providing a match to in vivo relaxation times. Radiomic features were extracted from the phantom inserts and the patients' lesions. Their repeatability was assessed by multiple measurements. RESULTS Muscle T1 and T2 were 1128 (806-1378) and 51 (40-65) ms, respectively. The phantom reproduced in vivo values within 13% (T1) and 12% (T2). T1 and T2 of tumour tissue were 1637 (1396-2121) and 94 (79-101) ms, respectively. The phantom insert best mimicking the tumour agreed within 7% (T1) and 24% (T2) with in vivo values. Out of 1034 features, 75% (95%) had interclass correlation coefficient greater than 0.9 on T1 (T2)-weighted images, reducing to 33% (25%) if the phantom was repositioned. The most repeatable features on phantom showed values in agreement with the features extracted from patients' lesions. CONCLUSIONS We developed an MR phantom with inserts mimicking both relaxation times and texture of pelvic tumours. As exemplified with repeatability assessment, such phantom is useful to investigate features robustness and optimise the radiomic workflow on pelvic MR images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Bianchini
- Department of Physics and INSTM RU, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy.
| | - Francesca Botta
- Medical Physics Unit, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniela Origgi
- Medical Physics Unit, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Rizzo
- Clinica di Radiologia EOC, Istituto di Imaging della Svizzera Italiana, Sede Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Manuel Mariani
- Department of Physics and INSTM RU, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Italy
| | - Paul Summers
- Division of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Pablo García-Polo
- Southern Europe Global Research Organization, GE Healthcare, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Cremonesi
- Radiation Research Unit, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Lascialfari
- Department of Physics and INSTM RU, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy; Department of Physics and INSTM RU, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Teague LM, Lopez J, Dowdle L, Mithoefer O, Badran B, Summers P, Etkin A, George M. Emotional arousal and neurocircuit integrity: A concurrent TMS-fMRI investigation of state dependence. Brain Stimul 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.12.711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
13
|
Caulfield K, Summers P, Li X, Savoca M, Fecchio M, Casarotto S, Massimini M, George M. Preliminary work toward creating a desktop-portable device for quickly measuring brain level of consciousness. Brain Stimul 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.12.917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
14
|
Meschini G, Paganelli C, Gianoli C, Summers P, Bellomi M, Baroni G, Riboldi M. A clustering approach to 4D MRI retrospective sorting for the investigation of different surrogates. Phys Med 2019; 58:107-113. [PMID: 30824141 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2018] [Revised: 01/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In retrospective 4-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (4D MRI) sorting, respiratory surrogate selection affects the image quality of reconstructed volumes. We propose a method for retrospective 4D MRI sorting based on clustering, which allowed us to compare the performance of single or multiple internal surrogates vs. a conventional external signal. METHODS A k-medoids clustering algorithm was exploited for sorting 2D MRI into 4D MRI, relying on (A) multiple or (B) single automatically tracked internal landmarks or (C) respiratory belt signal. 4D MRI reconstructions for seven liver cancer patients were compared to those of the state-of-the-art mutual information (MI) approach. Sorting artifacts were measured by the root mean square error (RMSE) between the diaphragm profile and a fitted second order curve. Diaphragm and tumor motions were evaluated. RESULTS The median RMSEs ranged 0.97-1.66 mm, 1.24-1.89 mm, 1.43-2.27 mm, 1.74-3.72 mm for the MI, (A), (B) and (C) methods, respectively. Significant differences (Friedman, α = 5%) were found between (C) and all other methods, and between (B) and MI approaches. The discrepancies between (A) and MI approaches ranged 1.1-6.2 mm and 0.7-5.3 mm respectively in diaphragm and tumor motions. Methods (A) and (B) showed similar ranges of motion. CONCLUSION With multiple internal points, our method yielded the description of a higher range of motion and similar image quality with respect to the MI approach. The single point method led to more artifacts, suggesting the superior suitability of multiple internal surrogates for retrospective 4D MRI sorting. Considering internal rather than external information favored superior performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgia Meschini
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, 20133 Milan, Italy.
| | - Chiara Paganelli
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Gianoli
- Chair of Experimental Physics - Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Am Coulombwall 1, 85748 Garching bei München, Germany
| | - Paul Summers
- Department of Imaging and Radiological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti, 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Bellomi
- Department of Imaging and Radiological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti, 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Emato-oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122, Italy
| | - Guido Baroni
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, 20133 Milan, Italy; Bioengineering Unit, CNAO Foundation, Str. Campeggi, 53, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Marco Riboldi
- Chair of Experimental Physics - Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Am Coulombwall 1, 85748 Garching bei München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Navone SE, Doniselli FM, Summers P, Guarnaccia L, Rampini P, Locatelli M, Campanella R, Marfia G, Costa A. Correlation of Preoperative Von Willebrand Factor with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Perfusion and Permeability Parameters as Predictors of Prognosis in Glioblastoma. World Neurosurg 2019; 122:e226-e234. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2018] [Revised: 09/26/2018] [Accepted: 09/28/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
16
|
Paganelli C, Whelan B, Peroni M, Summers P, Fast M, van de Lindt T, McClelland J, Eiben B, Keall P, Lomax T, Riboldi M, Baroni G. MRI-guidance for motion management in external beam radiotherapy: current status and future challenges. Phys Med Biol 2018; 63:22TR03. [PMID: 30457121 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaebcf] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
High precision conformal radiotherapy requires sophisticated imaging techniques to aid in target localisation for planning and treatment, particularly when organ motion due to respiration is involved. X-ray based imaging is a well-established standard for radiotherapy treatments. Over the last few years, the ability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to provide radiation-free images with high-resolution and superb soft tissue contrast has highlighted the potential of this imaging modality for radiotherapy treatment planning and motion management. In addition, these advantageous properties motivated several recent developments towards combined MRI radiation therapy treatment units, enabling in-room MRI-guidance and treatment adaptation. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the state-of-the-art in MRI-based image guidance for organ motion management in external beam radiotherapy. Methodological aspects of MRI for organ motion management are reviewed and their application in treatment planning, in-room guidance and adaptive radiotherapy described. Finally, a roadmap for an optimal use of MRI-guidance is highlighted and future challenges are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Paganelli
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy. Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed. www.cartcas.polimi.it
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Selby NM, Blankestijn PJ, Boor P, Combe C, Eckardt KU, Eikefjord E, Garcia-Fernandez N, Golay X, Gordon I, Grenier N, Hockings PD, Jensen JD, Joles JA, Kalra PA, Krämer BK, Mark PB, Mendichovszky IA, Nikolic O, Odudu A, Ong ACM, Ortiz A, Pruijm M, Remuzzi G, Rørvik J, de Seigneux S, Simms RJ, Slatinska J, Summers P, Taal MW, Thoeny HC, Vallée JP, Wolf M, Caroli A, Sourbron S. Magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers for chronic kidney disease: a position paper from the European Cooperation in Science and Technology Action PARENCHIMA. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2018; 33:ii4-ii14. [PMID: 30137584 PMCID: PMC6106645 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfy152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Functional renal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has seen a number of recent advances, and techniques are now available that can generate quantitative imaging biomarkers with the potential to improve the management of kidney disease. Such biomarkers are sensitive to changes in renal blood flow, tissue perfusion, oxygenation and microstructure (including inflammation and fibrosis), processes that are important in a range of renal diseases including chronic kidney disease. However, several challenges remain to move these techniques towards clinical adoption, from technical validation through biological and clinical validation, to demonstration of cost-effectiveness and regulatory qualification. To address these challenges, the European Cooperation in Science and Technology Action PARENCHIMA was initiated in early 2017. PARENCHIMA is a multidisciplinary pan-European network with an overarching aim of eliminating the main barriers to the broader evaluation, commercial exploitation and clinical use of renal MRI biomarkers. This position paper lays out PARENCHIMA's vision on key clinical questions that MRI must address to become more widely used in patients with kidney disease, first within research settings and ultimately in clinical practice. We then present a series of practical recommendations to accelerate the study and translation of these techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas M Selby
- Centre for Kidney Research and Innovation, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Peter J Blankestijn
- Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Boor
- Institute of Pathology and Department of Nephrology, RWTH University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Christian Combe
- Service de Néphrologie Transplantation Dialyse Aphérèse, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Kai-Uwe Eckardt
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eli Eikefjord
- Department of Health and Functioning, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Norway
| | | | - Xavier Golay
- Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Isky Gordon
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nicolas Grenier
- Service d'Imagerie Diagnostique et Interventionnelle de l'Adulte, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux Place Amelie Raba-Leon, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Jens D Jensen
- Departments of Renal and Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jaap A Joles
- Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Philip A Kalra
- Department of Renal Medicine, Salford Royal Hospital and Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Bernhard K Krämer
- Vth Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Patrick B Mark
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Iosif A Mendichovszky
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Olivera Nikolic
- Faculty of Medicine,University of Novi Sad, Center of Radiology, Clinical Centre of Vojvodina, Serbia
| | - Aghogho Odudu
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Albert C M Ong
- Academic Nephrology Unit, Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alberto Ortiz
- Nephrology and Hypertension, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz UAM, Madrid, Spain
| | - Menno Pruijm
- Service of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Giuseppe Remuzzi
- IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Jarle Rørvik
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Sophie de Seigneux
- Service of Nephrology, Department of Medicine Specialties, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Roslyn J Simms
- Academic Nephrology Unit, Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| | - Janka Slatinska
- Department of Nephrology, Transplant Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Paul Summers
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Radiology Division, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy
- QMRI Tech iSrl, Piazza dei Martiri Pennesi 20, Pescara, Italy
| | - Maarten W Taal
- Centre for Kidney Research and Innovation, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Harriet C Thoeny
- University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
- HFR Fribourg, Hôpital Cantonal, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Paul Vallée
- Radiology Department, Geneva University Hospital and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Marcos Wolf
- Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, MR-Centre of Excellence, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Anna Caroli
- IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Steven Sourbron
- Leeds Imaging Biomarkers Group, Department of Biomedical Imaging Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Oliveri S, Pricolo P, Pizzoli S, Faccio F, Lampis V, Summers P, Petralia G, Pravettoni G. Investigating cancer patient acceptance of Whole Body MRI. Clin Imaging 2018; 52:246-251. [PMID: 30170274 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2018] [Revised: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 08/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whole Body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) enables early cancer detection, without exposing the patient to ionizing radiation. Our aim was to investigate patients' acceptance of WB-MRI as a procedure for cancer staging and follow up. MATERIALS AND METHODS 135 oncologic subjects participated to the study. An ad hoc questionnaire was administered before and after WB-MRI, to assess patient's confidence and concerns about WB-MRI, psychological reactions, experience and perceived utility of the procedure. RESULTS Before undergoing WB-MRI, about 58% of the patients were concerned for cancer progression outcome. 80.4% felt that they were given good information about the exam and the most informed group also perceived and higher level of utility of WB-MRI and no risk. Among people reporting discomfort with the exam (51.9%) the main reasons were noise and exam duration. Despite this, 80% of patients expressed high levels of satisfaction, and the majority (69%) judged WB-MRI more acceptable than other diagnostic exams. Patients who believed to have received more information before the exam rated their global satisfaction higher. CONCLUSION Our results show that WB-MRI examinations were well-accepted and perceived with high levels of satisfaction by most patients. WB-MRI appears to be equally or more tolerable than other total body imaging modalities (e.g. PET, CT), especially if they receive enough information from the radiologist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Oliveri
- Department of Oncology and Hematoncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy; Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.
| | - Paola Pricolo
- Radiology Division, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Pizzoli
- Department of Oncology and Hematoncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Flavia Faccio
- Department of Oncology and Hematoncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina Lampis
- Department of Oncology and Hematoncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy; Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Paul Summers
- Radiology Division, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Oncology and Hematoncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy; Radiology Division, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Department of Oncology and Hematoncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy; Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mancini M, Summers P, Faita F, Brunetto MR, Callea F, De Nicola A, Di Lascio N, Farinati F, Gastaldelli A, Gridelli B, Mirabelli P, Neri E, Salvadori PA, Rebelos E, Tiribelli C, Valenti L, Salvatore M, Bonino F. Digital liver biopsy: Bio-imaging of fatty liver for translational and clinical research. World J Hepatol 2018; 10:231-245. [PMID: 29527259 PMCID: PMC5838442 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v10.i2.231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2017] [Revised: 01/27/2018] [Accepted: 02/25/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The rapidly growing field of functional, molecular and structural bio-imaging is providing an extraordinary new opportunity to overcome the limits of invasive liver biopsy and introduce a "digital biopsy" for in vivo study of liver pathophysiology. To foster the application of bio-imaging in clinical and translational research, there is a need to standardize the methods of both acquisition and the storage of the bio-images of the liver. It can be hoped that the combination of digital, liquid and histologic liver biopsies will provide an innovative synergistic tri-dimensional approach to identifying new aetiologies, diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for the optimization of personalized therapy of liver diseases and liver cancer. A group of experts of different disciplines (Special Interest Group for Personalized Hepatology of the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver, Institute for Biostructures and Bio-imaging of the National Research Council and Bio-banking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure) discussed criteria, methods and guidelines for facilitating the requisite application of data collection. This manuscript provides a multi-Author review of the issue with special focus on fatty liver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Mancini
- Institute of Biostructure and Bioimaging, National Research Council, Naples 80145, Italy
| | - Paul Summers
- European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Francesco Faita
- Institute of Clinical Physiology (IFC), National Research Council (CNR), Pisa 56124, Italy
| | - Maurizia R Brunetto
- Hepatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa 56125, Italy
| | - Francesco Callea
- Department of Pathology, Children Hospital Bambino Gesù IRCCS, Rome 00165, Italy
| | | | - Nicole Di Lascio
- Institute of Clinical Physiology (IFC), National Research Council (CNR), Pisa 56124, Italy
| | - Fabio Farinati
- Department of Gastroenterology, Oncology and Surgical Sciences, University of Padua, Padua 35121, Italy
| | - Amalia Gastaldelli
- Cardio-metabolic Risk Laboratory, Institute of Clinical Physiology (IFC), National Research Council (CNR), Pisa 56124, Italy
| | - Bruno Gridelli
- Institute for Health, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Chianciano Terme 53042, Italy
| | | | - Emanuele Neri
- Diagnostic Radiology 3, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa and "Ospedale S. Chiara" AOUP, Pisa 56126, Italy
| | - Piero A Salvadori
- Institute of Clinical Physiology (IFC), National Research Council (CNR), Pisa 56124, Italy
| | - Eleni Rebelos
- Hepatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa 56125, Italy
| | - Claudio Tiribelli
- Fondazione Italiana Fegato (FIF), Area Science Park, Campus Basovizza, Trieste 34012, Italy
| | - Luca Valenti
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano and Department of Internal Medicine and Metabolic Diseases, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
| | | | - Ferruccio Bonino
- Institute of Biostructure and Bioimaging, National Research Council, Naples 80145, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Seregni M, Paganelli C, Summers P, Bellomi M, Baroni G, Riboldi M. A Hybrid Image Registration and Matching Framework for Real-Time Motion Tracking in MRI-Guided Radiotherapy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2018; 65:131-139. [DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2017.2696361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
21
|
Prados F, Ashburner J, Blaiotta C, Brosch T, Carballido-Gamio J, Cardoso MJ, Conrad BN, Datta E, Dávid G, Leener BD, Dupont SM, Freund P, Wheeler-Kingshott CAMG, Grussu F, Henry R, Landman BA, Ljungberg E, Lyttle B, Ourselin S, Papinutto N, Saporito S, Schlaeger R, Smith SA, Summers P, Tam R, Yiannakas MC, Zhu A, Cohen-Adad J. Spinal cord grey matter segmentation challenge. Neuroimage 2017; 152:312-329. [PMID: 28286318 PMCID: PMC5440179 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2016] [Revised: 01/27/2017] [Accepted: 03/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
An important image processing step in spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging is the ability to reliably and accurately segment grey and white matter for tissue specific analysis. There are several semi- or fully-automated segmentation methods for cervical cord cross-sectional area measurement with an excellent performance close or equal to the manual segmentation. However, grey matter segmentation is still challenging due to small cross-sectional size and shape, and active research is being conducted by several groups around the world in this field. Therefore a grey matter spinal cord segmentation challenge was organised to test different capabilities of various methods using the same multi-centre and multi-vendor dataset acquired with distinct 3D gradient-echo sequences. This challenge aimed to characterize the state-of-the-art in the field as well as identifying new opportunities for future improvements. Six different spinal cord grey matter segmentation methods developed independently by various research groups across the world and their performance were compared to manual segmentation outcomes, the present gold-standard. All algorithms provided good overall results for detecting the grey matter butterfly, albeit with variable performance in certain quality-of-segmentation metrics. The data have been made publicly available and the challenge web site remains open to new submissions. No modifications were introduced to any of the presented methods as a result of this challenge for the purposes of this publication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferran Prados
- Translational Imaging Group, Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, Malet Place Engineering Building, London WC1E 6BT, UK; NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, Russell Square, London WC1B 5EH, UK.
| | - John Ashburner
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Claudia Blaiotta
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Tom Brosch
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4
| | | | - Manuel Jorge Cardoso
- Translational Imaging Group, Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, Malet Place Engineering Building, London WC1E 6BT, UK; Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Benjamin N Conrad
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, Biomedical Engineering, Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Institute of Image Science at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Esha Datta
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Gergely Dávid
- Spinal Cord Injury Center Balgrist, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Sara M Dupont
- NeuroPoly Lab, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Patrick Freund
- Spinal Cord Injury Center Balgrist, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott
- NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, Russell Square, London WC1B 5EH, UK; Brain MRI 3T Centre, C. Mondino National Neurological Institute, Pavia, Italy; Department of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesco Grussu
- NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, Russell Square, London WC1B 5EH, UK
| | - Roland Henry
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Bennett A Landman
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, Biomedical Engineering, Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Institute of Image Science at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Emil Ljungberg
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 2B5
| | - Bailey Lyttle
- Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Sebastien Ourselin
- Translational Imaging Group, Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, Malet Place Engineering Building, London WC1E 6BT, UK; Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Nico Papinutto
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Regina Schlaeger
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Seth A Smith
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Biomedical Engineering, Ophthalmology, Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Paul Summers
- Department of Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121, Modena, MO, Italy
| | - Roger Tam
- Department of Radiology, UBC MS/MRI Research Group, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 2B5
| | - Marios C Yiannakas
- NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, Russell Square, London WC1B 5EH, UK
| | - Alyssa Zhu
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Julien Cohen-Adad
- NeuroPoly Lab, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Functional Neuroimaging Unit, CRIUGM, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Paganelli C, Summers P, Gianoli C, Bellomi M, Baroni G, Riboldi M. A tool for validating MRI-guided strategies: a digital breathing CT/MRI phantom of the abdominal site. Med Biol Eng Comput 2017; 55:2001-2014. [DOI: 10.1007/s11517-017-1646-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2016] [Accepted: 03/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
23
|
Bonello L, Preda L, Conte G, Giannitto C, Raimondi S, Ansarin M, Maffini F, Summers P, Bellomi M. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx: what does the apparent diffusion coefficient tell us about its histology? Acta Radiol 2016; 57:1344-1351. [PMID: 26013024 DOI: 10.1177/0284185115587734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Diffusion-weighted imaging obtained with magnetic resonance (DW-MRI) is a non-invasive imaging tool potentially able to provide information about microstructural tumor characteristics. Purpose To prospectively analyze the correlation between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and clinical-histologic characteristics of squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA) of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Material and Methods Sixty-seven patients with untreated, histologically proven SCCA of the oral cavity and oropharynx underwent conventional and diffusion-weighted (b-values 0, 50, 250, 500, and 900 s/mm2) MRI. Tumor ADC was calculated from regions of interest drawn manually on the highest b-value images using ImageJ (ImageJ, NIH) and fsl (fsl 4, University of Oxford) image processing packages. ADC was calculated in two ways: standard ADC using all b-values; and ADCHigh using only b-values ≥ 250 s/mm2. We assessed the correlations between both ADC and ADCHigh and the clinical-histological characteristics of SCCA. Results Fifty-two patients (36 men, 16 women; mean age, 55 ± 13 years) were suitable for ADC calculation. Mean ADC was 1136.0 ± 108.5 × 10-6 mm2/s. Mean tumor ADCHigh was 991.2 ± 152.1 × 10-6 mm2/s. Mean tumor size was 32.3 ± 13.4 mm (range, 14.0-69.0 mm). We observed no correlation of either ADC or ADCHigh values with any of the clinical-histological tumor characteristics. Undifferentiated tumors (G3) showed lower apparent diffusion coefficient values compared to differentiated ones (G1-G2), without reaching statistical significance. Conclusion We did not observe any statistically significant correlation between ADC values and clinical-histological characteristics of SCCA of the oral cavity and oropharynx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke Bonello
- Specialisation School of Radiology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Preda
- Department of Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Conte
- Specialisation School of Radiology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Sara Raimondi
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Mohssen Ansarin
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Fausto Maffini
- Department of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Paul Summers
- Department of Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Bellomi
- Specialisation School of Radiology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Isaias IU, Trujillo P, Summers P, Marotta G, Mainardi L, Pezzoli G, Zecca L, Costa A. Neuromelanin Imaging and Dopaminergic Loss in Parkinson's Disease. Front Aging Neurosci 2016; 8:196. [PMID: 27597825 PMCID: PMC4992725 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2016] [Accepted: 08/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder in which the major pathologic substrate is a loss of dopaminergic neurons from the substantia nigra. Our main objective was to determine the correspondence between changes in the substantia nigra, evident in neuromelanin and iron sensitive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and dopaminergic striatal innervation loss in patients with PD. Eighteen patients and 18 healthy control subjects were included in the study. Using neuromelanin-MRI, we measured the volume of the substantia nigra and the contrast-to-noise-ratio between substantia nigra and a background region. The apparent transverse relaxation rate and magnetic susceptibility of the substantia nigra were calculated from dual-echo MRI. Striatal dopaminergic innervation was measured as density of dopamine transporter (DAT) by means of single-photon emission computed tomography and [123I] N-ω-fluoropropyl-2b-carbomethoxy-3b-(4-iodophenyl) tropane. Patients showed a reduced volume of the substantia nigra and contrast-to-noise-ratio and both positively correlated with the corresponding striatal DAT density. The apparent transverse relaxation rate and magnetic susceptibility values of the substantia nigra did not differ between patients and healthy controls. The best predictor of DAT reduction was the volume of the substantia nigra. Clinical and imaging correlations were also investigated for the locus coeruleus. Our results suggest that neuromelanin-MRI can be used for quantifying substantia nigra pathology in PD where it closely correlates with dopaminergic striatal innervation loss. Longitudinal studies should further explore the role of Neuromelanin-MRI as an imaging biomarker of PD, especially for subjects at risk of developing the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis U Isaias
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital WuerzburgWürzburg, Germany; Centro Parkinson, Pini-CTOMilan, Italy
| | - Paula Trujillo
- Department of Neuroradiology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore PoliclinicoMilan, Italy; Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di MilanoMilan, Italy
| | - Paul Summers
- Department of Neuroradiology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Marotta
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Mainardi
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano Milan, Italy
| | | | - Luigi Zecca
- Italian National Research Council, Institute of Biomedical Technologies Segrate, Italy
| | - Antonella Costa
- Department of Neuroradiology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rizzo S, Buscarino V, Origgi D, Summers P, Raimondi S, Lazzari R, Landoni F, Bellomi M. Evaluation of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and MR spectroscopy (MRS) as early response biomarkers in cervical cancer patients. Radiol Med 2016; 121:838-846. [DOI: 10.1007/s11547-016-0665-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2016] [Accepted: 06/22/2016] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|
26
|
Peedell C, Aynsley E, Shakespeare D, Green J, Summers P, Reynolds J, Burke K, Bayles H, Huntley C, Richmond N. EP-1212: Are the encouraging SABR results for NSCLC reproducible outside of pioneering academic institutions? Radiother Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(16)32462-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
27
|
Paganelli C, Summers P, Bellomi M, Baroni G, Riboldi M. Liver 4DMRI: A retrospective image-based sorting method. Med Phys 2015; 42:4814-21. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4927252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
|
28
|
Petralia G, Musi G, Padhani AR, Summers P, Renne G, Alessi S, Raimondi S, Matei DV, Renne SL, Jereczek-Fossa BA, De Cobelli O, Bellomi M. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Multiparametric MR imaging-directed intraoperative frozen-section analysis to reduce the rate of positive surgical margins. Radiology 2015; 274:434-444. [PMID: 25271856 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14140044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate whether use of multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-directed intraoperative frozen-section (IFS) analysis during nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy reduces the rate of positive surgical margins. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data was approved by an institutional ethics committee, and the requirement for informed consent was waived. Data were reviewed for 134 patients who underwent preoperative multiparametric MR imaging (T2 weighted, diffusion weighted, and dynamic contrast-material enhanced) and nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, during which IFS analysis was used, and secondary resections were performed when IFS results were positive for cancer. Control patients (n = 134) matched for age, prostate-specific antigen level, and stage were selected from a pool of 322 patients who underwent nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy without multiparametric MR imaging and IFS analysis. Rates of positive surgical margins were compared by means of the McNemar test, and a multivariate conditional logistic regression model was used to estimate the odds ratio of positive surgical margins for patients who underwent MR imaging and IFS analysis compared with control subjects. RESULTS Eighteen patients who underwent MR imaging and IFS analysis underwent secondary resections, and 13 of these patients were found to have negative surgical margins at final pathologic examination. Positive surgical margins were found less frequently in the patients who underwent MR imaging and IFS analysis than in control patients (7.5% vs 18.7%, P = .01). When the differences in risk factors are taken into account, patients who underwent MR imaging and IFS had one-seventh the risk of having positive surgical margins relative to control patients (adjusted odds ratio: 0.15; 95% confidence interval: 0.04, 0.61). CONCLUSION The significantly lower rate of positive surgical margins compared with that in control patients provides preliminary evidence of the positive clinical effect of multiparametric MR imaging-directed IFS analysis for patients who undergo prostatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Petralia
- From the Divisions of Radiology (G.P., P.S., S.A., M.B.), Urology (G.M., D.V.M., O.D.C.), Pathology (G.R., S.L.R.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.R.), and Radiotherapy (B.A.J.F.), European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, England (A.R.P.); and Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy (S.L.R., B.A.J.F., O.D.C., M.B.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lewis D, Summers P, Followill D, Sahoo N, Mahajan A, Stingo F, Kry S. SU-E-CAMPUS-T-03: Development and Implementation of An Anthropomorphic Pediatric Spine Phantom for the Assessment of Craniospinal Irradiation Procedures in Proton Therapy. Med Phys 2014. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4889010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
30
|
Followill D, Lowenstein J, Molineu A, Alvarez P, Summers P, Kry S. SU-C-BRD-07: The Radiological Physics Center (RPC): 45 Years of Improving Radiotherapy Dosimetry. Med Phys 2014. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4889720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
31
|
Stoker J, Summers P, Li X, Gomez D, Sahoo N, Zhu X, Gillin M. SU-E-T-133: Dosimetric Impact of Scan Orientation Relative to Target Motion During Spot Scanning Proton Therapy. Med Phys 2014. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4888463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
32
|
Summers P, Lowenstein J, Jakel O, Prokesch H, Alvarez P, Followill D. SU-E-T-509: Validation of the Use of OSLD for Carbon Beam Remote Dosimetry. Med Phys 2014. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4888842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
33
|
Kerns J, Alvarez P, Followill D, Lowenstein J, Molineu A, Summers P, Kry S. SU-E-T-471: Small Field Jaw/MLC Reference Data. Med Phys 2014. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4888804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
34
|
Kerns J, Alvarez P, Followill D, Lowenstein J, Molineu A, Summers P, Kry S. TU-C-BRE-03: Aggregation of Linac Measurement Data. Med Phys 2014. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4889266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
35
|
Bijlenga P, Ebeling C, Jaegersberg M, Summers P, Rogers A, Waterworth A, Iavindrasana J, Macho J, Pereira VM, Bukovics P, Vivas E, Sturkenboom MC, Wright J, Friedrich CM, Frangi A, Byrne J, Schaller K, Rufenacht D, Narata AP, Clarke A, Yarnold J, Kover F, Schatlo B, Hudak S, Teta P, Blasco J, Gonzalez AM, Lovblad KO, Coley S, Dòczi T, Risselada R, Sola T, Lawford P, Patel U, Singh P, Wickins J, Elger B, Beyleveld D, Wood S, Hasselmeyer P, Arbona A, Meyer R, Hose R, Lonsdale G, Hofmann-Apitius M, Frangi A, Bijlenga P, Hofmann-Apitius M, Hose R, Lonsdale G, Arbona A, Hasselmeyer P, Rüfenacht D, Bijlenga P, Summers P, Jägersberg M, Rogers A, Schaller K, Byrne J, Wright J, Wilkins J, Beyleveld D, Elger B, Waterworth A, Wood S, Iavindrasana J, Meyer R, Friedrich C, Ebeling C, Ebeling C, Bijlenga P, Risselada R, Friedrich C, Sturkenboom MCJM, Bijlenga P, Jägersberg M, Rogers A, Schatlo B, Teta P, Schaller K, Mendes-Pereira V, Gonzalez AM, Narata AP, Lovblad KO, Rüfenacht DA, Yarnold J, Summers P, Clarke A, Zilani G, Byrne J, Macho J, Blasco J, Bukovics P, Kover F, Hudak I, Doczi T, Risselada R, Sturkenboom MCJM, Singh P, Waterworth A, Patel U, Coley S, Lawford P, Sola T, Vivas E. Risk of Rupture of Small Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms Is Similar to Posterior Circulation Aneurysms. Stroke 2013; 44:3018-26. [DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.113.001667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background and Purpose—
According to the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (ISUIA), anterior circulation (AC) aneurysms of <7 mm in diameter have a minimal risk of rupture. It is general experience, however, that anterior communicating artery (AcoA) aneurysms are frequent and mostly rupture at <7 mm. The aim of the study was to assess whether AcoA aneurysms behave differently from other AC aneurysms.
Methods—
Information about 932 patients newly diagnosed with intracranial aneurysms between November 1, 2006, and March 31, 2012, including aneurysm status at diagnosis, its location, size, and risk factors, was collected during the multicenter @neurIST project. For each location or location and size subgroup, the odds ratio (OR) of aneurysms being ruptured at diagnosis was calculated.
Results—
The OR for aneurysms to be discovered ruptured was significantly higher for AcoA (OR, 3.5 [95% confidence interval, 2.6–4.5]) and posterior circulation (OR, 2.6 [95% confidence interval, 2.1–3.3]) than for AC excluding AcoA (OR, 0.5 [95% confidence interval, 0.4–0.6]). Although a threshold of 7 mm has been suggested by ISUIA as a threshold for aggressive treatment, AcoA aneurysms <7 mm were more frequently found ruptured (OR, 2.0 [95% confidence interval, 1.3–3.0]) than AC aneurysms of 7 to 12 mm diameter as defined in ISUIA.
Conclusions—
We found that AC aneurysms are not a homogenous group. Aneurysms between 4 and 7 mm located in AcoA or distal anterior cerebral artery present similar rupture odds to posterior circulation aneurysms. Intervention should be recommended for this high-risk lesion group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Bijlenga
- From the Service de Neurochirurgie/Départment de Neurosciences Cliniques (Ph.B., M.J., A.R., K.S.), Division de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Interventionelle (V.M.P.), Division des Services Informatiques (J.I.), Faculté de Médecine de Genève and Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève, Switzerland; Fraunhofer Institut Algorithmen und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Sankt Augustin, Germany (C.E., C.M.F.); Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Christian Ebeling
- From the Service de Neurochirurgie/Départment de Neurosciences Cliniques (Ph.B., M.J., A.R., K.S.), Division de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Interventionelle (V.M.P.), Division des Services Informatiques (J.I.), Faculté de Médecine de Genève and Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève, Switzerland; Fraunhofer Institut Algorithmen und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Sankt Augustin, Germany (C.E., C.M.F.); Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Max Jaegersberg
- From the Service de Neurochirurgie/Départment de Neurosciences Cliniques (Ph.B., M.J., A.R., K.S.), Division de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Interventionelle (V.M.P.), Division des Services Informatiques (J.I.), Faculté de Médecine de Genève and Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève, Switzerland; Fraunhofer Institut Algorithmen und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Sankt Augustin, Germany (C.E., C.M.F.); Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Summers
- From the Service de Neurochirurgie/Départment de Neurosciences Cliniques (Ph.B., M.J., A.R., K.S.), Division de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Interventionelle (V.M.P.), Division des Services Informatiques (J.I.), Faculté de Médecine de Genève and Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève, Switzerland; Fraunhofer Institut Algorithmen und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Sankt Augustin, Germany (C.E., C.M.F.); Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Alister Rogers
- From the Service de Neurochirurgie/Départment de Neurosciences Cliniques (Ph.B., M.J., A.R., K.S.), Division de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Interventionelle (V.M.P.), Division des Services Informatiques (J.I.), Faculté de Médecine de Genève and Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève, Switzerland; Fraunhofer Institut Algorithmen und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Sankt Augustin, Germany (C.E., C.M.F.); Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Alan Waterworth
- From the Service de Neurochirurgie/Départment de Neurosciences Cliniques (Ph.B., M.J., A.R., K.S.), Division de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Interventionelle (V.M.P.), Division des Services Informatiques (J.I.), Faculté de Médecine de Genève and Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève, Switzerland; Fraunhofer Institut Algorithmen und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Sankt Augustin, Germany (C.E., C.M.F.); Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jimison Iavindrasana
- From the Service de Neurochirurgie/Départment de Neurosciences Cliniques (Ph.B., M.J., A.R., K.S.), Division de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Interventionelle (V.M.P.), Division des Services Informatiques (J.I.), Faculté de Médecine de Genève and Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève, Switzerland; Fraunhofer Institut Algorithmen und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Sankt Augustin, Germany (C.E., C.M.F.); Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Juan Macho
- From the Service de Neurochirurgie/Départment de Neurosciences Cliniques (Ph.B., M.J., A.R., K.S.), Division de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Interventionelle (V.M.P.), Division des Services Informatiques (J.I.), Faculté de Médecine de Genève and Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève, Switzerland; Fraunhofer Institut Algorithmen und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Sankt Augustin, Germany (C.E., C.M.F.); Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Vitor Mendes Pereira
- From the Service de Neurochirurgie/Départment de Neurosciences Cliniques (Ph.B., M.J., A.R., K.S.), Division de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Interventionelle (V.M.P.), Division des Services Informatiques (J.I.), Faculté de Médecine de Genève and Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève, Switzerland; Fraunhofer Institut Algorithmen und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Sankt Augustin, Germany (C.E., C.M.F.); Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Bukovics
- From the Service de Neurochirurgie/Départment de Neurosciences Cliniques (Ph.B., M.J., A.R., K.S.), Division de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Interventionelle (V.M.P.), Division des Services Informatiques (J.I.), Faculté de Médecine de Genève and Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève, Switzerland; Fraunhofer Institut Algorithmen und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Sankt Augustin, Germany (C.E., C.M.F.); Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Elio Vivas
- From the Service de Neurochirurgie/Départment de Neurosciences Cliniques (Ph.B., M.J., A.R., K.S.), Division de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Interventionelle (V.M.P.), Division des Services Informatiques (J.I.), Faculté de Médecine de Genève and Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève, Switzerland; Fraunhofer Institut Algorithmen und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Sankt Augustin, Germany (C.E., C.M.F.); Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Miriam C.J.M. Sturkenboom
- From the Service de Neurochirurgie/Départment de Neurosciences Cliniques (Ph.B., M.J., A.R., K.S.), Division de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Interventionelle (V.M.P.), Division des Services Informatiques (J.I.), Faculté de Médecine de Genève and Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève, Switzerland; Fraunhofer Institut Algorithmen und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Sankt Augustin, Germany (C.E., C.M.F.); Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jessica Wright
- From the Service de Neurochirurgie/Départment de Neurosciences Cliniques (Ph.B., M.J., A.R., K.S.), Division de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Interventionelle (V.M.P.), Division des Services Informatiques (J.I.), Faculté de Médecine de Genève and Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève, Switzerland; Fraunhofer Institut Algorithmen und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Sankt Augustin, Germany (C.E., C.M.F.); Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Christoph M. Friedrich
- From the Service de Neurochirurgie/Départment de Neurosciences Cliniques (Ph.B., M.J., A.R., K.S.), Division de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Interventionelle (V.M.P.), Division des Services Informatiques (J.I.), Faculté de Médecine de Genève and Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève, Switzerland; Fraunhofer Institut Algorithmen und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Sankt Augustin, Germany (C.E., C.M.F.); Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Alejandro Frangi
- From the Service de Neurochirurgie/Départment de Neurosciences Cliniques (Ph.B., M.J., A.R., K.S.), Division de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Interventionelle (V.M.P.), Division des Services Informatiques (J.I.), Faculté de Médecine de Genève and Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève, Switzerland; Fraunhofer Institut Algorithmen und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Sankt Augustin, Germany (C.E., C.M.F.); Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - James Byrne
- From the Service de Neurochirurgie/Départment de Neurosciences Cliniques (Ph.B., M.J., A.R., K.S.), Division de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Interventionelle (V.M.P.), Division des Services Informatiques (J.I.), Faculté de Médecine de Genève and Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève, Switzerland; Fraunhofer Institut Algorithmen und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Sankt Augustin, Germany (C.E., C.M.F.); Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Karl Schaller
- From the Service de Neurochirurgie/Départment de Neurosciences Cliniques (Ph.B., M.J., A.R., K.S.), Division de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Interventionelle (V.M.P.), Division des Services Informatiques (J.I.), Faculté de Médecine de Genève and Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève, Switzerland; Fraunhofer Institut Algorithmen und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Sankt Augustin, Germany (C.E., C.M.F.); Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Rufenacht
- From the Service de Neurochirurgie/Départment de Neurosciences Cliniques (Ph.B., M.J., A.R., K.S.), Division de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Interventionelle (V.M.P.), Division des Services Informatiques (J.I.), Faculté de Médecine de Genève and Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève, Switzerland; Fraunhofer Institut Algorithmen und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Sankt Augustin, Germany (C.E., C.M.F.); Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Philippe Bijlenga
- Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève et Faculté de médecine de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Rod Hose
- Royal Hallamshire Hospital and University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Guy Lonsdale
- NEC Laboratories Europe, IT Research Division, Sankt Augustin, Germany
| | - Antonio Arbona
- NEC Laboratories Europe, IT Research Division, Sankt Augustin, Germany
| | - Peer Hasselmeyer
- NEC Laboratories Europe, IT Research Division, Sankt Augustin, Germany
| | - Daniel Rüfenacht
- Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève et Faculté de médecine de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Philippe Bijlenga
- Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève et Faculté de médecine de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Paul Summers
- John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Max Jägersberg
- Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève et Faculté de médecine de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alister Rogers
- Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève et Faculté de médecine de Genève, Geneva Switzerland
| | - Karl Schaller
- Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève et Faculté de médecine de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - James Byrne
- John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Bernice Elger
- Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève et Faculté de médecine de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alan Waterworth
- Royal Hallamshire Hospital and University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Steven Wood
- Royal Hallamshire Hospital and University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Jimison Iavindrasana
- Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève et Faculté de médecine de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Rodolphe Meyer
- Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève et Faculté de médecine de Genève, Geneva. Switzerland
| | - Christoph Friedrich
- Fraunhofer Institut Algorithmen und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Sankt Augustin, Germany
| | - Christian Ebeling
- Fraunhofer Institut Algorithmen und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Sankt Augustin, Germany
| | - Christian Ebeling
- Fraunhofer Institut Algorithmen und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Sankt Augustin, Germany
| | - Philippe Bijlenga
- Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève et Faculté de médecine de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Christoph Friedrich
- Fraunhofer Institut Algorithmen und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Sankt Augustin, Germany
| | | | - Philippe Bijlenga
- Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève et Faculté de médecine de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Max Jägersberg
- Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève et Faculté de médecine de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alister Rogers
- Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève et Faculté de médecine de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Bawarjan Schatlo
- Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève et Faculté de médecine de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Teta
- Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève et Faculté de médecine de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Karl Schaller
- Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève et Faculté de médecine de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Vitor Mendes-Pereira
- Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève et Faculté de médecine de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ana Marcos Gonzalez
- Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève et Faculté de médecine de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ana Paula Narata
- Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève et Faculté de médecine de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Karl O Lovblad
- Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève et Faculté de médecine de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Daniel A. Rüfenacht
- Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève et Faculté de médecine de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Julia Yarnold
- John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Summers
- John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Alison Clarke
- John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Gulam Zilani
- John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - James Byrne
- John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Ferenc Kover
- University of Pècs Medical School, Pècs, Hungary
| | - Istvan Hudak
- University of Pècs Medical School, Pècs, Hungary
| | - Tamas Doczi
- University of Pècs Medical School, Pècs, Hungary
| | | | | | - Pankaj Singh
- Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | | | - Umang Patel
- Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Stuart Coley
- Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | | | - Teresa Sola
- Hospital General de Catalunya, San Cugat del Valles, Spain
| | - Elio Vivas
- Hospital General de Catalunya, San Cugat del Valles, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wheeler-Kingshott CA, Stroman PW, Schwab JM, Bacon M, Bosma R, Brooks J, Cadotte DW, Carlstedt T, Ciccarelli O, Cohen-Adad J, Curt A, Evangelou N, Fehlings MG, Filippi M, Kelley BJ, Kollias S, Mackay A, Porro CA, Smith S, Strittmatter SM, Summers P, Thompson AJ, Tracey I. The current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging: applications. Neuroimage 2013; 84:1082-93. [PMID: 23859923 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 155] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2013] [Revised: 06/30/2013] [Accepted: 07/04/2013] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
A first-ever spinal cord imaging meeting was sponsored by the International Spinal Research Trust and the Wings for Life Foundation with the aim of identifying the current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging, the current greatest challenges, and greatest needs for future development. This meeting was attended by a small group of invited experts spanning all aspects of spinal cord imaging from basic research to clinical practice. The greatest current challenges for spinal cord imaging were identified as arising from the imaging environment itself; difficult imaging environment created by the bone surrounding the spinal canal, physiological motion of the cord and adjacent tissues, and small crosssectional dimensions of the spinal cord, exacerbated by metallic implants often present in injured patients. Challenges were also identified as a result of a lack of "critical mass" of researchers taking on the development of spinal cord imaging, affecting both the rate of progress in the field, and the demand for equipment and software to manufacturers to produce the necessary tools. Here we define the current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging, discuss the underlying theory and challenges, and present the evidence for the current and potential power of these methods. In two review papers (part I and part II), we propose that the challenges can be overcome with advances in methods, improving availability and effectiveness of methods, and linking existing researchers to create the necessary scientific and clinical network to advance the rate of progress and impact of the research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C A Wheeler-Kingshott
- NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, England, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Summers P, Ibbott G, Moyers M, Grant R, Followill D. TH-C-144-11: Radiological Physics Center (RPC) Approval of Proton Centers for NCI-Sponsored Clinical Trials. Med Phys 2013. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4815805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
38
|
Neihart J, Sahoo N, Balter P, Summers P, Palmer M, Kerr M, Followill D. TU-A-108-07: Design and Verification of a Heterogeneous Proton Equivalent Thorax Phantom for Use in End-To-End Assessment of Pencil Beam Proton Therapy. Med Phys 2013. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4815330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
39
|
Dhanesar S, Sahoo N, Kerr M, Taylor M, Summers P, Alvarez P, Wu R, Poenisch F, Zhu X, Gillin M. SU-E-T-403: Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans with Multiple Fields for Prostate Cancer. Med Phys 2013. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4814837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
40
|
Stroman PW, Wheeler-Kingshott C, Bacon M, Schwab JM, Bosma R, Brooks J, Cadotte D, Carlstedt T, Ciccarelli O, Cohen-Adad J, Curt A, Evangelou N, Fehlings MG, Filippi M, Kelley BJ, Kollias S, Mackay A, Porro CA, Smith S, Strittmatter SM, Summers P, Tracey I. The current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging: methods. Neuroimage 2013; 84:1070-81. [PMID: 23685159 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 217] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2013] [Revised: 04/08/2013] [Accepted: 04/16/2013] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
A first-ever spinal cord imaging meeting was sponsored by the International Spinal Research Trust and the Wings for Life Foundation with the aim of identifying the current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging, the current greatest challenges, and greatest needs for future development. This meeting was attended by a small group of invited experts spanning all aspects of spinal cord imaging from basic research to clinical practice. The greatest current challenges for spinal cord imaging were identified as arising from the imaging environment itself; difficult imaging environment created by the bone surrounding the spinal canal, physiological motion of the cord and adjacent tissues, and small cross-sectional dimensions of the spinal cord, exacerbated by metallic implants often present in injured patients. Challenges were also identified as a result of a lack of "critical mass" of researchers taking on the development of spinal cord imaging, affecting both the rate of progress in the field, and the demand for equipment and software to manufacturers to produce the necessary tools. Here we define the current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging, discuss the underlying theory and challenges, and present the evidence for the current and potential power of these methods. In two review papers (part I and part II), we propose that the challenges can be overcome with advances in methods, improving availability and effectiveness of methods, and linking existing researchers to create the necessary scientific and clinical network to advance the rate of progress and impact of the research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P W Stroman
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Carr R, Shakespeare D, Aynsley E, Lawless S, Summers P, Green J, Pilling K, Richmond N, Walker C, Peedell C. 178 Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for early stage, medically inoperable NSCLC: initial outcomes from 3 years experience at James Cook University Hospital (JCUH), Middlesbrough. Lung Cancer 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5002(13)70178-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
42
|
Summers P, Ibbott G, Moyers M, Grant R, Followill D. Comparison of Clinical Parameters for Proton Therapy in the United States. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.07.083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
43
|
Petralia G, Summers P, Viotti S, Montefrancesco R, Raimondi S, Bellomi M. Quantification of variability in breath-hold perfusion CT of hepatocellular carcinoma: a step toward clinical use. Radiology 2012; 265:448-56. [PMID: 22996748 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12111232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the variability of breath-hold perfusion computed tomography (CT) parameters and to investigate whether these measurements are affected by a commercial software upgrade in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Written informed consent was obtained from all participants in this institutional ethics committee-approved study. Perfusion CT examinations in HCC patients were prospectively analyzed by three readers. Two readers repeated their analysis after an interval of at least 4 weeks. Inter- and intraobserver agreement, as well as intersoftware agreement, were assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LoA), with adjustment for correlation between repeated measures. RESULTS Ninety-three breath-hold perfusion CT examinations were included from 23 HCC patients. The ICC between readers was very high (>0.91) for blood flow (BF), high (>0.84) for blood volume (BV), and lower (>0.30 and >0.39) for mean transit time (MTT) and permeability surface area product (PS), respectively, while ICC between readings was high (>0.80) for BF and BV, good (>0.75) for PS, and lower (>0.38) for MTT, irrespective of software version. By using the current software, the clinically relevant percentage of LoA between readers for BF were -33%; for BV, -39%; for MTT, 55%; and for PS, -93%. Between readings by the most expert reader, the clinically relevant LoA were -35% for BF,-43% for BV, 33% for MTT, and -79% for PS. BF, BV, and PS values were significantly higher and MTT values were significantly lower (P<.01) with the current software version relative to the previous version. CONCLUSION With the current CT perfusion software, only decreases between scans of HCC lesions of more than 35% for BF and 43% for BV, or an increase of more than 55% for MTT, could be considered beyond the analysis variability. The perfusion parameters obtained with the current and previous software versions were not exchangeable. The results of this study are specific for breath-hold perfusion CT of HCC and may not apply to different acquisition protocols and tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Radiology and Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Lowenstein J, Kry S, Molineu A, Alvarez P, Aguirre J, Summers P, Followill D. SU-E-T-223: High-Energy Photon Standard Dosimetry Data: A Quality Assurance Tool. Med Phys 2012; 39:3754. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4735286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
45
|
Summers P, Ibbott G, Moyers M, Grant R, Followill D. MO-D-BRB-04: The Approval Process for the Use of Proton Therapy in NCI-Sponsored Clinical Trials. Med Phys 2012; 39:3866. [PMID: 28518264 DOI: 10.1118/1.4735785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the approval process for the use of proton therapy in NCI- sponsored clinical trials. METHODS The RPC has developed a comprehensive system for the approval of proton therapy centers for participation in clinical trials. The approval process includes: 1) completion of the proton facility questionnaire, 2) participation in the RPC's annual TLD remote audit program, 3) electronic submission of treatment planning data to the Image-Guided Therapy Center (ITC), and 4) successful completion of an on-site dosimetry review visit, including the irradiation of two of the RPC's anthropomorphic proton phantoms (prostate and spine). The on-site audits allow the RPC to review the institution's treatment planning process, from simulation to treatment delivery, as well as their quality assurance practices. The RPC performs a complete set of measurements that tests the CT simulator's CT# vs. RSP conversion curve, treatment planning data, on-board imaging, and treatment delivery. These measurements detect gross errors that might lead to inaccurate proton dose delivery. The review of the institutions' QA procedures allows the RPC to encourage all proton centers to maintain a consistent level of periodic monitoring of their proton therapy delivery. Upon completion of the visit, a full report is written detailing the results from the visit, phantom irradiation, and recommendations for improving their treatment delivery and QA. RESULTS To date, the RPC has approved seven proton therapy centers for the use of scattered or uniform scanning proton treatment delivery in clinical trials. Results of the phantom irradiations have identified an error in the HU vs RLSP curve. The site visits have identified several lapses in QA procedures, inappropriate HU vs RLSP values, and weaknesses in treatment planning. CONCLUSIONS The RPC's proton therapy approval process has been developed and has identified areas of improvement for proton centers to use proton therapy in clinical trials. Work supported by grants CA10953, CA059267, and CA81647 (NCI, DHHS).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Summers
- UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - G Ibbott
- UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - M Moyers
- UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - R Grant
- UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Tonigan J, Kry S, Summers P, Balter P, Diel T, Followill D. TH-C-BRB-12: The Magnitude of H&N IMRT Dose Delivery Errors from Three Possible Failure Modes: Beam Quality, Symmetry, and MLC Position. Med Phys 2012. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4736315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
47
|
Dhanesar S, Sahoo N, Taylor M, Song X, Poenisch F, Summers P, Li H, Zhu XR, Gillin M. SU-D-BRCD-01: Evaluation of Zebra Multi-Layer Ionization Chamber System for Patient Treatment Field and Machine QA for Spot Scanning and Passive Scattering Proton Beams. Med Phys 2012; 39:3613. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4734667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
48
|
Song X, Sahoo N, Wu R, Taylor M, Georges R, Zhu X, Summers P, Gillin M. SU-E-T-291: Dosimetry of Double Scattered Proton Beam Fields Used for Cranio-Spinal Irradiation. Med Phys 2012; 39:3770. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4735359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
49
|
Followill D, Lowenstein J, Molineu A, Alvarez P, Aguirre J, Kry S, Summers P, Ibbott G. MO-D-BRB-02: The Radiological Physics Center's Quality Audit Program: Where Can We Improve? Med Phys 2012; 39:3866. [PMID: 28518233 DOI: 10.1118/1.4735783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the findings of the Radiological Physics Center's (RPC) QA audits of institutions participating in NCI sponsored clinical trials. METHODS The RPC has developed an extensive Quality Assurance (QA) program over the past 44 years. This program includes on-site dosimetry reviews where measurements on therapy machines are made, records are reviewed and personnel are interviewed. The program's remote audit tools include mailed dosimeters (OSLD/TLD) to verify output calibration, comparison of dosimetry data with RPC 'standard' data, evaluation of benchmark and patient calculations to verify the treatment planning algorithms, review of institution's QA procedures and records, and use of anthropomorphic phantoms to verify tumor dose delivery. The RPC endeavors to assist institutions in finding the origins of any detected discrepancies, and to resolve them. RESULTS Ninety percent of institutions receiving dosimetry recommendations has remained level for the past 5 years. The most frequent recommendations were for not performing TG-40 QA tests, wedge factors, small field size output factors and off-axis factors. Since TG-51 was published, the number of beam calibrations audited during visits with ion chambers, that met the RPC's ±3% criterion, decreased initially but has risen to pre-TG-51 levels. The OSLD/TLD program shows that only ∼3% of the beams are outside our ±5% criteria, but these discrepancies are distributed over 12-20% of the institutions. The percent of institutions with ï,3 l beam outside the RPC's criteria is approximately the same whether OSLD/TLD or ion chambers were used. The first time passing rate for the anthropomorphic phantoms is increasing with time. The prostate phantom has the highest pass rate while the spine phantom has the lowest. CONCLUSIONS Numerous dosimetry errors continue to be discovered by the RPC's QA program and the RPC continues to play an important role in helping institutions resolve these errors. This work was supported by PHS grants CA10953 and CA081647 awarded by NCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - A Molineu
- UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - P Alvarez
- UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - J Aguirre
- UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - S Kry
- UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - P Summers
- UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - G Ibbott
- UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Summers P, Ibbott G, Moyers M, Grant R, Followill D. MO-D-BRB-03: Comparison of Proton Therapy Institutional Data Collected by the RPC. Med Phys 2012; 39:3866. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4735784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|