1
|
Manga M, Kolsky P, Rosenboom JW, Ramalingam S, Sriramajayam L, Bartram J, Stewart J. Public health performance of sanitation technologies in Tamil Nadu, India: Initial perspectives based on E. coli release. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2022; 243:113987. [PMID: 35623255 PMCID: PMC9227721 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2022.113987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Sanitation is intended to reduce the spread and burden of diseases transmitted from excreta. Pathogen reduction from excreta before sludge or effluent discharge to the environment would seem a logical and useful performance indicator for sanitation systems. However, the relative magnitudes of pathogen release from common sanitation technologies are not well understood. We, therefore, investigated the feasibility of performance measurement of different sanitation technologies in Tamil Nadu, India in reducing the release of the pathogen indicator Escherichia coli (E. coli). After conducting users’ surveys and technical assessments of the locally prevalent sanitation systems, we classified them into 7 distinct categories (based on both observed physical characteristic and usage) within a widely-accepted physical typology. Faecal sludge and wastewater samples were collected and analysed for E. coli and total solids from 136 household systems, 24 community systems, and 23 sanitary sewer oveflows. We estimated the average volumetric release rates of wastewater and faecal sludge from the different sanitation technologies. Average daily per capita E. coli release was computed, and used as one indicator of the public health performance of technologies. We found that on-site installations described by owners as “septic systems” included diverse forms of tanks and pits of uncertain performance. We observed a statistically significant difference in the average daily per capita E. coli release from different sanitation technologies (p = 0.00001). Pathogen release from the studied on-site sanitation technologies varied by as much as 5 orders of magnitude from “lined pits” (5.4 Log10 E. coli per person per day) to “overflowing sanitary sewers” and “direct discharge pipes” (10.3–10.5 Log10 E. coli per person per day). Other technologies lay between these extremes, and their performances in E. coli removal also varied significantly, in both statistical and practical terms. Our results suggest that although faecal sludge management along the sanitation service chain is important, sanitation planners of the observed systems (and probably elsewhere) should direct higher priority to proper management of the liquid effluents from these systems to minimize public health hazards. We conclude that (i) the work demonstrates a new and promising approach for estimating the public health performance of differing sanitation technologies, (ii) if E.coli is accepted as an indicator of the public health hazard of releases from sanitation systems, our results strongly suggest that safe containment of excreta for an extended period substantially reduces pathogen numbers and the risk of pathogen release into the environment; and (iii) there are some simple but little-used technical improvements to design and construction of on-site sanitation systems which could significantly reduce the release of pathogens to the environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Musa Manga
- The Water Institute at UNC, Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, The Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4114 McGavran Hall, Campus Box # 7431, NC, 27599, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Construction Economics and Management, College of Engineering, Design, Art and Technology (CEDAT), Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
| | - Pete Kolsky
- The Water Institute at UNC, Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, The Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4114 McGavran Hall, Campus Box # 7431, NC, 27599, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Sudha Ramalingam
- PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Off, Avinashi Rd, Masakalipalayam, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641004, India
| | - Lavanya Sriramajayam
- PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Off, Avinashi Rd, Masakalipalayam, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641004, India
| | - Jamie Bartram
- The Water Institute at UNC, Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, The Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4114 McGavran Hall, Campus Box # 7431, NC, 27599, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Jill Stewart
- The Water Institute at UNC, Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, The Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4114 McGavran Hall, Campus Box # 7431, NC, 27599, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Knee J, Sumner T, Adriano Z, Anderson C, Bush F, Capone D, Casmo V, Holcomb D, Kolsky P, MacDougall A, Molotkova E, Braga JM, Russo C, Schmidt WP, Stewart J, Zambrana W, Zuin V, Nalá R, Cumming O, Brown J. Effects of an urban sanitation intervention on childhood enteric infection and diarrhea in Maputo, Mozambique: A controlled before-and-after trial. eLife 2021; 10:e62278. [PMID: 33835026 PMCID: PMC8121544 DOI: 10.7554/elife.62278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
We conducted a controlled before-and-after trial to evaluate the impact of an onsite urban sanitation intervention on the prevalence of enteric infection, soil transmitted helminth re-infection, and diarrhea among children in Maputo, Mozambique. A non-governmental organization replaced existing poor-quality latrines with pour-flush toilets with septic tanks serving household clusters. We enrolled children aged 1-48 months at baseline and measured outcomes before and 12 and 24 months after the intervention, with concurrent measurement among children in a comparable control arm. Despite nearly exclusive use, we found no evidence that intervention affected the prevalence of any measured outcome after 12 or 24 months of exposure. Among children born into study sites after intervention, we observed a reduced prevalence of Trichuris and Shigella infection relative to the same age group at baseline (<2 years old). Protection from birth may be important to reduce exposure to and infection with enteric pathogens in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jackie Knee
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Infectious Tropical Diseases, Disease Control DepartmentLondonUnited Kingdom
- Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Civil and Environmental EngineeringAtlantaUnited States
| | - Trent Sumner
- Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Civil and Environmental EngineeringAtlantaUnited States
| | | | - Claire Anderson
- Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Civil and Environmental EngineeringAtlantaUnited States
| | - Farran Bush
- Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Chemical and Biomolecular EngineeringAtlantaUnited States
| | - Drew Capone
- Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Civil and Environmental EngineeringAtlantaUnited States
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of EpidemiologyChapel HillUnited States
| | | | - David Holcomb
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of EpidemiologyChapel HillUnited States
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Environmental Sciences and EngineeringChapel HillUnited States
| | - Pete Kolsky
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of EpidemiologyChapel HillUnited States
| | - Amy MacDougall
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, Department of Medical StatisticsLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Evgeniya Molotkova
- Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Biological SciencesAtlantaUnited States
| | | | - Celina Russo
- Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Civil and Environmental EngineeringAtlantaUnited States
| | - Wolf Peter Schmidt
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Infectious Tropical Diseases, Disease Control DepartmentLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Jill Stewart
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of EpidemiologyChapel HillUnited States
| | - Winnie Zambrana
- Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Civil and Environmental EngineeringAtlantaUnited States
| | - Valentina Zuin
- Yale-NUS College, Division of Social ScienceSingaporeSingapore
| | | | - Oliver Cumming
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Infectious Tropical Diseases, Disease Control DepartmentLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Joe Brown
- Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Civil and Environmental EngineeringAtlantaUnited States
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of EpidemiologyChapel HillUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Crocker J, Saywell D, Shields KF, Kolsky P, Bartram J. The true costs of participatory sanitation: Evidence from community-led total sanitation studies in Ghana and Ethiopia. Sci Total Environ 2017; 601-602:1075-1083. [PMID: 28599364 PMCID: PMC5536257 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2017] [Revised: 05/25/2017] [Accepted: 05/31/2017] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Evidence on sanitation and hygiene program costs is used for many purposes. The few studies that report costs use top-down costing methods that are inaccurate and inappropriate. Community-led total sanitation (CLTS) is a participatory behavior-change approach that presents difficulties for cost analysis. We used implementation tracking and bottom-up, activity-based costing to assess the process, program costs, and local investments for four CLTS interventions in Ghana and Ethiopia. Data collection included implementation checklists, surveys, and financial records review. Financial costs and value-of-time spent on CLTS by different actors were assessed. Results are disaggregated by intervention, cost category, actor, geographic area, and project month. The average household size was 4.0 people in Ghana, and 5.8 people in Ethiopia. The program cost of CLTS was $30.34-$81.56 per household targeted in Ghana, and $14.15-$19.21 in Ethiopia. Most program costs were from training for three of four interventions. Local investments ranged from $7.93-$22.36 per household targeted in Ghana, and $2.35-$3.41 in Ethiopia. This is the first study to present comprehensive, disaggregated costs of a sanitation and hygiene behavior-change intervention. The findings can be used to inform policy and finance decisions, plan program scale-up, perform cost-effectiveness and benefit studies, and compare different interventions. The costing method is applicable to other public health behavior-change programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonny Crocker
- The Water Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 148 Rosenau Hall, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7431, USA.
| | - Darren Saywell
- Plan International USA, 1255 23rd Swt NW Suite 300, Washington, DC 20037, USA
| | - Katherine F Shields
- The Water Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 148 Rosenau Hall, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7431, USA
| | - Pete Kolsky
- The Water Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 148 Rosenau Hall, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7431, USA
| | - Jamie Bartram
- The Water Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 148 Rosenau Hall, CB #7431, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7431, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
This paper discusses the distinction between the transmission of infectious diseases within the domestic domain (the area normally occupied by and under the control of a household) and that in the public domain, which includes public places of work, schooling, commerce and recreation as well as the streets and fields. Whereas transmission in the public domain can allow a single case to cause a large epidemic, transmission in the domestic domain is less dramatic and often ignored, although it may account for a substantial number of cases. Statistical methods are available to estimate the relative importance of the two. To control transmission in the public domain, intervention by public authorities is likely to be required. Two examples show how environmental interventions for disease control tend to address transmission in one or the other domain; interventions are needed in both domains in order to interrupt transmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Cairncross
- Environmental Health Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|