Uncovering the armpit of SBRT: An institutional experience with stereotactic radiation of axillary metastases

Purpose/objectives

The growing use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in metastatic cancer has led to its use in varying anatomic locations. The objective of this study was to review our institutional SBRT experience for axillary metastases (AM), focusing on outcomes and process.

Materials/methods

Patients treated with SBRT to AM from 2014 to 2022 were reviewed. Cumulative incidence functions were used to estimate the incidence of local failure (LF), with death as competing risk. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Univariate regression analysis examined predictors of LF.

Results

We analyzed 37 patients with 39 AM who received SBRT. Patients were predominantly female (60 %) and elderly (median age: 72). Median follow-up was 14.6 months. Common primary cancers included breast (43 %), skin (19 %), and lung (14 %). Treatment indication included oligoprogression (46 %), oligometastases (35 %) and symptomatic progression (19 %). A minority had prior overlapping radiation (18 %) or surgery (11 %). Most had prior systemic therapy (70 %).Significant heterogeneity in planning technique was identified; a minority of patient received 4-D CT scans (46 %), MR-simulation (21 %), or contrast (10 %). Median dose was 40 Gy (interquartile range (IQR): 35-40) in 5 fractions, (BED10 = 72 Gy). Seventeen cases (44 %) utilized a low-dose elective volume to cover remaining axilla.At first assessment, 87 % had partial or complete response, with a single progression. Of symptomatic patients (n = 14), 57 % had complete resolution and 21 % had improvement. One and 2-year LF rate were 16 % and 20 %, respectively. Univariable analysis showed increasing BED reduced risk of LF. Median OS was 21.0 months (95 % [Confidence Interval (CI)] 17.3-not reached) and median PFS was 7.0 months (95 % [CI] 4.3-11.3). Two grade 3 events were identified, and no grade 4/5.

Conclusion

Using SBRT for AM demonstrated low rates of toxicity and LF, and respectable symptom improvement. Variation in treatment delivery has prompted development of an institutional protocol to standardize technique and increase efficiency. Limited followup may limit detection of local failure and late toxicity.

Brachytherapy for high grade prostate cancer induces distinct changes in circulating CD4 and CD8 T cells - Implications for systemic control

This exploratory study is a follow up to our previous investigation of immune response in the circulation of high-grade Gleason 9 prostate cancer patients treated with EBRT + BT compared to EBRT alone. Notably, EBRT + BT demonstrates the potential to elicit an effect on CD4/CD8 ratio which may have attributed to improved clinical response to therapy. Our findings show promise for leveraging circulating immune cells as predictive biomarkers for radiotherapy response.

1,10-phenanthroline inhibits sumoylation and reveals that yeast SUMO modifications are highly transient

The steady-state levels of protein sumoylation depend on relative rates of conjugation and desumoylation. Whether SUMO modifications are generally long-lasting or short-lived is unknown. Here we show that treating budding yeast cultures with 1,10-phenanthroline abolishes most SUMO conjugations within one minute, without impacting ubiquitination, an analogous post-translational modification. 1,10-phenanthroline inhibits the formation of the E1~SUMO thioester intermediate, demonstrating that it targets the first step in the sumoylation pathway. SUMO conjugations are retained after treatment with 1,10-phenanthroline in yeast that express a defective form of the desumoylase Ulp1, indicating that Ulp1 is responsible for eliminating existing SUMO modifications almost instantly when de novo sumoylation is inhibited. This reveals that SUMO modifications are normally extremely transient because of continuous desumoylation by Ulp1. Supporting our findings, we demonstrate that sumoylation of two specific targets, Sko1 and Tfg1, virtually disappears within one minute of impairing de novo sumoylation. Altogether, we have identified an extremely rapid and potent inhibitor of sumoylation, and our work reveals that SUMO modifications are remarkably short-lived.

Uncovering the Armpit of Axillary SBRT

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

The growing use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in metastatic cancer has led to applications in new and unique anatomic locations, highlighting the importance of effective, safe, reproducible treatment delivery. The objective of this study was to review our institutional SBRT experience for axillary metastases (AM), focusing on outcomes, safety and process.

MATERIALS/METHODS

In this ethics approved single-institution retrospective review, patients treated with SBRT to AM from 2014-2022 had tumor, treatment planning, and dosimetric variables abstracted. Toxicity was assessed per Common Terminology for Adverse Events V5.0. Cumulative incidence functions were used to estimate the incidence of local failure (LF), with death as competing risk. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

We analyzed 37 patients with 39 AM who received SBRT. Patients were predominantly female (60%), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 (62%), and elderly (median age: 72), with a median follow-up of 14.6 months. Common primary sites included breast (n = 16, 43%), skin (n = 7, 19%), and lung (n = 5, 14%). Treatment indication included oligoprogression (n = 18, 46%), oligometastases (n = 14, 36%) and symptomatic progression (n = 7, 18%). A minority had prior overlapping radiation (n = 7, 18%) or regional surgery (n = 4, 11%), while most had prior systemic therapy (n = 26, 70%). Significant heterogeneity in simulation, planning and treatment was identified. Immobilization included 5-point thermoplastic mask (n = 12, 32%), Vacloc (n = 12, 32%) arms-up thorax bag (n = 11, 30%). 4-D CT scans were obtained in 46%, MR simulation in 21%, and intravenous contrast in 10%. Median dose was 40 Gy (interquartile range (IQR): 35-40) in 5 fractions, (BED10 = 72 Gy), over a median of 12 days (IQR: 9-14). Seventeen cases (44%) utilized a low-dose elective volume to cover remaining axilla; 14% used a high dose clinical target volume. Median planning target volume margin was 5mm (range: 3-10mm), and plans were generated with 5 different dose constraint protocols. At first radiographic assessment, 87% had partial or complete response, with a single progression. Of symptomatic patients (n = 14), 57% had complete symptom resolution and 21% had improvement. One and 2-year LF rate were 19% and 31%, respectively. Median OS was 21.0 months (95% [Confidence Interval (CI)] 17.3-not reached) and median PFS was 7.0 months (95% [CI] 4.3-11.3). Acute and late toxicities were uncommon, with two grade 3 events (1 plexopathy in a case with tumor involving brachial plexus, 1 skin ulceration) identified, and no grade 4/5.

CONCLUSION

In this series of AM SBRT, low rates of toxicity, and good rates of LF and symptom improvement were observed. As treatment was delivered with a variety of individual treatment differences, an institutional protocol is under development to standardize technique, optimize efficiency and improve evaluability.

Safety and Efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Ultra-Central Thoracic Tumors

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly utilized in the management of ultra-central thoracic tumors, although concerns regarding significant toxicity remain. We sought to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of SBRT to these tumors at our institution.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients with ultra-central lung tumors or nodes treated at our institution with SBRT between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Ultra-central was defined as having the planning target volume (PTV) overlapping or abutting the central bronchial tree and/or esophagus. All SBRT plans were generated with homogenous dose distributions using target coverage objectives of ITV V100% >99%, PTV V95% >99%, and an ideal PTV Dmax <105% (strict <120%). All plans were reviewed in quality assurance rounds by a team of dosimetrists, physicists, and radiation oncologists. The primary endpoint was incidence of severe toxicity (ST), defined as SBRT-related grade ≥3 toxicities, graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V5.0. Secondary endpoints included local failure (LF), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Competing risk analysis was used to estimate incidence and predictors of ST and LF, with death as a competing risk. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS and OS.

RESULTS

A total of 154 patients who received 162 ultra-central courses of SBRT were included, with a median follow-up of 21.5 months. Treatment intent was most commonly for oligoprogression (46%), oligometastasis (30%), followed by curative (20%). The most frequent tumor histologies were NSCLC (41%) and RCC (26%). SBRT prescription doses ranged from 30-55 Gy in 5 fractions (BED10 range 48-115 Gy). The most common prescription was 50 Gy in 5 fractions (42%). The cumulative incidence of ST was 8.9% at 3-years. The most common ST was pneumonitis (n = 4). Notable toxicities included bronchopleural fistula (n = 2, grade 3 and 4), bronchial stricture (n = 1, grade 3), and esophagitis leading to bleeding (n = 1, grade 4). There were no esophageal strictures or perforations, and no bronchial bleeds. There was 1 possible treatment related death from pneumonitis/pneumonia. Predictors of any ST included increased lung V5 Gy, decreased PTV V95%, and not having prior radiation therapy to the chest. The cumulative incidence of LF was 4.8%, 11% and 14% at 1-, 2-, and 3-years respectively. Predictors of LF included younger age, and greater volume of overlap between the PTV and esophagus. Median PFS was 8.4 months, while median OS was 3.7 years.

CONCLUSION

In one of the largest case series of ultra-central thoracic SBRT reported to date, homogenously prescribed SBRT plans were associated with relatively low rates of ST and LF across a variety of treatment indications. Predictors of ST should be interpreted recognizing the heterogeneity in toxicities observed. Identified predictors of both ST and LF can contribute to future work to optimize the therapeutic ratio in treatment of ultra-central thoracic tumors.

Dosimetric Parameters Predictive of Treatment-Related Toxicity in High Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy for Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

High dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as monotherapy is an effective treatment for patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer and is increasingly being offered as a 2-fraction protocol. There is a lack of consensus on the optimal dosimetric planning parameters to use, or whether there is any benefit summating dosimetric parameters from more than one implant. Our goal is to determine planning parameters associated with disease control, toxicity and health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

MATERIALS/METHODS

Data were collected on 83 patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer who received 2 fractions of 13.5 Gy HDR brachytherapy without androgen-deprivation therapy as part of a randomized phase II clinical trial. An in-house deformable, registration algorithm was used to co-register and dose-summate the plans from both implants for each patient. Acute and late GU and GI toxicities were measured using CTCAE 4.0 and HRQOL was measured in urinary, bowel, sexual and hormonal domains using the EPIC scores. Treatment efficacy was assessed through PSA measurement and imaging with or without biopsy where indicated. Covariates included baseline clinical factors, disease characteristics and treatment dosimetric parameters. Cox proportional hazards was performed to evaluate covariates impact on treatment toxicity and efficacy, and logistic regression analysis evaluated covariates impact on HRQOL.

RESULTS

Among the 83 patients, median prostate volume was 46.7cm3. Median summated planning target volume receiving 100% prescription dose (PTV V100%) was 97.4%, median PTV V150% 42.4% and median PTV V200% 15.5%. Median highest dose to the 1cm3 rectum (D1cc) was 66.9% of the prescription dose and median rectum V80% was 0.008cm3. Median urethral D1cc was 99.0% of the prescription dose, median urethral Dmax 121.7% and median urethral D10% 116.2%. Grade ≥2 GI toxicity was uncommon (3.7% acute and 8.5% late), but grade ≥2 GU toxicity was reported in 73.2% (acute) and 46.3% (late) patients. Rectum D1cc and V80% were found to be significantly associated with grade 2 or higher acute GI toxicity, while use of a-blocker at baseline was associated with grade ≥2 acute GU toxicity. Similarly, use of a-blocker was associated with late grade ≥2 GU toxicity, but with no dosimetric associations. No other variables were associated with treatment-related toxicities. Only rectum D1cc was significantly associated with changes in bowel EPIC scores. Estimated 5-year biochemical disease-free survival was 93.9% and 5-year cumulative incidence of local failure was 3.8%.

CONCLUSION

HDR monotherapy with 27 Gy delivered in 2 fractions in treatment of prostate cancer is well tolerated with high rates of disease control and minimal toxicity. Dose summation between 2 fractions of HDR brachytherapy is feasible, with rectal dose predicting acute GI toxicity. The lack of association between dose metrics and urinary toxicity raises the potential for further dose escalation.

Dosimetric Predictors of Toxicities and Quality of Life Following Two-Fraction Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

There is emerging interest in two-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (2#SBRT) for localized prostate cancer. However, there is limited data to guide organs at risk (OAR) dose constraints in 2#SBRT. We aim to identify dosimetric predictors of toxicities and quality of life (QoL) using real life patient data from two prospective 2#SBRT trials.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We included 60 patients who had 2#SBRT in the 2STAR (NCT02031328) and 2SMART (NCT03588819) phase 2 trials. The prescribed dose was 26Gy to the prostate +/- focal boost of 32Gy to the dominant intraprostatic lesions. Toxicities and QoL data were prospectively collected using CTCAEv4 and EPIC26 questionnaires. For QoL, we reported the minimal clinical important changes (MCIC), defined as changes in QoL score of >0.5 standard deviation from baseline QoL score. We evaluated the bladder, urethra, rectum, and penile bulb dosimetry (urethra dosimetry only available in 30 patients in 2SMART trial). Some of the dosimetric parameters were log-transformed to normalize the distribution. Cox regression was used to identify dosimetric predictors for acute and late grade ≥2 GU toxicities. Logistic regression was used to identify dosimetric predictors for late MCIC in urinary, bowel and sexual QoL domains. Backward stepwise selection was used to identify significant dosimetric parameters. For GU toxicities and urinary QoL, three additional clinical factors (age, prostate volume and IPSS) were included in the final model as confounding factors. Receiver operating characteristics curve was used to identify cut-off for significant dosimetric parameters.

RESULTS

The median follow-up for the cohort was 56 months (range: 39-78 months). The cumulative acute and late grade ³2 GU toxicities were 62% (37/60) and 57% (34/60) respectively. No bladder or urethra dosimetric parameter was associated with acute grade ≥2 GU toxicities. Bladder D0.5cc was significant predictor of late grade ≥2 GU toxicities in univariate model (P = 0.05), but not in multivariate model. Baseline IPSS score was the single strongest predictor for late grade ≥2 GU toxicities (HR = 1.9; 95% CI = 1.1-3.4; P = 0.03). For late QoL outcomes, there were 36% (21/58), 28% (16/58), and 29% (17/58) of patients with MCIC in urinary, bowel and sexual QoL domains respectively. Bladder V10Gy was associated with late urinary MCIC in multivariate model after adjusting for clinical confounders (HR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.1-6.6; P = 0.04). 48% (14/29) and 24% (7/29) of patients with bladder V10Gy>13.9% and V10Gy≤13.9% respectively had late urinary MCIC. No rectum and penile bulb dosimetry parameters was identified to be associated with late bowel or sexual QoL.

CONCLUSION

Using real life patient data from prospective clinical trials with medium term follow-up, we identified statistically significant bladder dosimetry parameter predictive of late urinary QoL. This finding could be useful to guide OAR dose constraints in prostate 2#SBRT trials.

Prevalence and factors associated with flares following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and spondyloarthritis: a national cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To determine prevalence and factors associated with flares post Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA).

METHODS

A retrospective multi-centre study was conducted (January 2021 to February 2022). Data were collected during index visit, defined as first post-vaccine visit in which the patient had a physician-defined flare, or if at least 3 months had elapsed since first vaccine dose, whichever came first. Factors associated with flares were identified using mixed effects Cox regression and expressed as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Total of 2377 patients were included (1563 RA, 415 PsA and 399 SpA). Among patients with RA, PsA and SpA, 21.3%, 24.1% and 21.8% experienced a flare respectively. Of those who experienced a flare, only 10.2%, 11.0% and 14.9% were severe in patients with RA, PsA and SpA respectively. Patients with low or moderate/high disease were more likely to flare compared to those in remission in patients with RA only (HR: 1.68, 95% CI 1.22-2.31; HR: 2.28, 95% CI 1.50-3.48, respectively). Receiving the Moderna vaccine was associated with a higher HR of flare compared to the Pfizer vaccine in patients with PsA only (HR: 2.21, 95% CI 1.20-4.08). Patients who had two vaccine doses were found to be less likely to flare (HR: 0.08, 95% CI 0.06-0.10). HRs of flares were not significantly different among RA, PsA and SpA.

CONCLUSION

About one-fifth of patients experienced a disease flare post COVID-19 mRNA vaccination, but most flares were non-severe. Patients with active disease prior to vaccination should be monitored closely for disease flares, especially in patients with RA.

Accelerated Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Centrally Located Lung Tumours Not Suitable for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy

AIMS

Accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy is used at our institution for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients not eligible for stereotactic body radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to report clinical outcomes of delivering 60 Gy in 15 fractions for these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All NSCLC patients who received 60 Gy in 15 fractions were reviewed. Outcomes of interest were local failure, regional failure, distant progression, overall survival and treatment-associated toxicities.

RESULTS

In total, 111 patients were included. The median age was 78.8 years and most tumours were adenocarcinoma (n = 55, 49.6%). Sixty-five patients (58.6%) were N0. The cumulative incidence of local failure at 12 and 24 months in the N0 cohort was 5.2% and 14.2%, respectively, compared with 11.5% and 14.8% for N+ patients. Tumour size >35 mm predicted for local failure (hazard ratio 2.706, 95% confidence interval 1.002-7.307, P = 0.0494). Distant progression at 12 and 24 months in N0 patients was 13.7% and 24.3% compared with 24.6% and 33.5% in N+ patients. In N0 patients, larger tumour size was associated with increased risk of distant progression. The median overall survival was 38.1 months in N0 patients versus 31.7 months in N+ patients. The most common toxicity was radiation pneumonitis (n = 6, 6.4%). The incidence of any grade 3 toxicity was 10.3% at ≥1 year. There were no deaths or hospitalisations attributed to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy is well tolerated and resulted in favourable clinical outcomes in various stages of NSCLC patients.

Examiner perceptions of the MRCGP recorded consultation assessment for general practice licensing during COVID-19: cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The Recorded Consultation Assessment (RCA) was developed rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic to replace the Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA) for UK general practice licensing. Our aim was to evaluate examiner perceptions of the RCA.

METHODS

We employed a cross-sectional design using a questionnaire survey of RCA examiners with attitudinal (relating to examiners thoughts and perceptions of the RCA) and free text response options. We conducted statistical descriptive and factor analysis of quantitative data with qualitative thematic analysis of free text responses.

RESULTS

Overall, 182 of 260 (70%) examiners completed the questionnaire. Responders felt that consultations submitted were representative of the work of a typical GP during the pandemic and provided a good sample across the curriculum. They were also generally positive about the logistic, advisory and other support provided as well as the digital platform. Despite responders generally agreeing there was sufficient information available in video or audio consultations to judge candidates' data gathering, clinical management, and interpersonal skills, they were less confident about their ability to make judgments of candidates' performance compared with the CSA. The qualitative analysis of free text responses detailed the problems of case selection and content, explained examiners' difficulties when making judgments, and detailed the generally positive views about support, training and information technology. Responders also provided helpful recommendations for improving the assessment.

CONCLUSION

The RCA was considered by examiners to be feasible and broadly acceptable, although they experienced challenges from candidate case selection, case content and judgments leading to suggested areas for improvement.

Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Stroke Attributed to Large- or Small-Vessel Disease: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of the STROKE AF Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

The Stroke of Known Cause and Underlying Atrial Fibrillation (STROKE AF) trial found that approximately 1 in 8 patients with recent ischemic stroke attributed to large- or small-vessel disease had poststroke atrial fibrillation (AF) detected by an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) at 12 months. Identifying predictors of AF could be useful when considering an ICM in routine poststroke clinical care.

Objective

To determine the association between commonly assessed risk factors and poststroke detection of new AF in the STROKE AF cohort monitored by ICM.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a prespecified analysis of a randomized (1:1) clinical trial that enrolled patients between April 1, 2016, and July 12, 2019, with primary follow-up through 2020 and mean (SD) duration of 11.0 (3.0) months. Eligible patients were selected from 33 clinical research sites in the US. Patients had an index stroke attributed to large- or small-vessel disease and were 60 years or older or aged 50 to 59 years with at least 1 additional stroke risk factor. A total of 496 patients were enrolled, and 492 were randomly assigned to study groups (3 did not meet inclusion criteria, and 1 withdrew consent). Patients in the ICM group had the index stroke within 10 days before insertion. Data were analyzed from October 8, 2021, to January 28, 2022.

Interventions

ICM monitoring vs site-specific usual care (short-duration external cardiac monitoring).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The ICM device automatically detects AF episodes 2 or more minutes in length; episodes were adjudicated by an expert committee. Cox regression multivariable modeling included all parameters identified in the univariate analysis having P values <.10. AF detection rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates.

Results

The analysis included the 242 participants randomly assigned to the ICM group in the STROKE AF study. Among 242 patients monitored with ICM, 27 developed AF (mean [SD] age, 66.6 [9.3] years; 144 men [60.0%]; 96 [40.0%] women). Two patients had missing baseline data and exited the study early. Univariate predictors of AF detection included age (per 1-year increments: hazard ratio [HR], 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.09; P = .02), CHA2DS2-VASc score (per point: HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.15-2.06; P = .004), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR, 2.49; 95% CI, 0.86-7.20; P = .09), congestive heart failure (CHF; with preserved or reduced ejection fraction: HR, 6.64; 95% CI, 2.29-19.24; P < .001), left atrial enlargement (LAE; HR, 3.63; 95% CI, 1.55-8.47; P = .003), QRS duration (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.04; P = .04), and kidney dysfunction (HR, 3.58; 95% CI, 1.35-9.46; P = .01). In multivariable modeling (n = 197), only CHF (HR, 5.06; 95% CI, 1.45-17.64; P = .05) and LAE (HR, 3.32; 1.34-8.19; P = .009) remained significant predictors of AF. At 12 months, patients with CHF and/or LAE (40 of 142 patients) had an AF detection rate of 23.4% vs 5.0% for patients with neither (HR, 5.1; 95% CI, 2.0-12.8; P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

Among patients with ischemic stroke attributed to large- or small-vessel disease, CHF and LAE were associated with a significantly increased risk of poststroke AF detection. These patients may benefit most from the use of ICMs as part of a secondary stroke prevention strategy. However, the study was not powered for clinical predictors of AF, and therefore, other clinical characteristics may not have reached statistical significance.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02700945.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Oncological and Renal Function Outcomes

AIMS

To evaluate oncological and renal function outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for medically inoperable patients with localised renal cell carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients treated with curative intent SBRT (30-45 Gy in five fractions or 42 Gy in three fractions) were included. Data on local control (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] v1.1), distant metastasis, impact on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proportional ipsilateral and contralateral renal functions (measured through renal scans) were collected. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to determine association of variables with oncological and renal function outcomes.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients were analysed. The median follow-up was 27.8 months (interquartile range 17.6-41.7). Fifty-seven per cent had tumours ≥ T1b. One-, 2- and 4-year cumulative incidence of local failure was 5.85, 7.77 and 7.77%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of distant metastasis at 2 years was 4.24%. On multivariable analysis, a lower planning target volume (PTV) mean dose (P = 0.019) and a larger PTV (P = 0.005) were significantly associated with the risk of developing local failure. A lower PTV maximum dose (P = 0.039) was significantly associated with the risk of developing distant metastasis. The median change in global eGFR (ml/min) from pre-SBRT levels was -7.0 (interquartile range -14.5 to -1.0) at 1 year and -11.5 (interquartile range -19.5 to -4.0) at 2 years. The proportion of ipsilateral (differential) renal function decreased over time from 47% of overall renal function pre-SBRT to 36% at 2 years, whereas the proportion of contralateral renal function correspondingly improved. On multivariable analysis, a higher volume of uninvolved renal cortex (P < 0.0001) was significantly associated with a smaller decrease in eGFR over time.

CONCLUSION

In this large institutional cohort, oncological outcomes of renal cell carcinoma treated with SBRT were favourable and a longitudinal decline in renal function in the ipsilateral kidney and compensatory increase in the contralateral kidney were observed. Clinical and dosimetric factors were significantly associated with oncological and renal function outcomes.

POS0200 POST-mRNA VACCINE FLARES IN AUTOIMMUNE INFLAMMATORY RHEUMATIC DISEASES: INTERIM RESULTS FROM THE CORONAVIRUS NATIONAL VACCINE REGISTRY FOR IMMUNE DISEASES SINGAPORE (CONVIN-SING)

Background

Published data suggest no increased rate of flare of autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD) after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination; however, the studies are limited by small sample size, short follow up or at risk of selection bias (voluntary physician reports or patient surveys).

Objectives

To study flares of AIIRD within three months of the first dose of an anti-SARS-COV2 mRNA vaccine.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of consecutive AIIRD patients ≥ 12 years old, across six public hospitals in Singapore who received at least one dose of an mRNA (Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna) vaccine. Data were censored at the first post-vaccine clinic visit when the patient had flared or if ≥ three months had elapsed since the first dose of the vaccine, whichever came first. Predictors of flare were determined by Cox proportional hazards analysis and time to flare was examined using a Nelson Aalen cumulative hazard estimate (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Nelson-Aalen curve of flares over time

Results

2339 patients (74% Chinese, 72% female) of median (IQR) age 64 (53, 71) years were included in the interim analysis (Table 1). 2112 (90%) had the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine and 195 (8%) had Moderna, with a median (IQR) interval of 21 (21, 23) days between the two doses. The most common AIIRD diagnoses were Rheumatoid arthritis (1063, 45%), Psoriatic arthritis (296, 12.6%) and Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (288, 12.3%). 186 (8%) were treated with biologics/ targeted disease modifying agents. 2125 (91%) patients were in low disease activity or remission. Treatment was interrupted for vaccination in only 18 (0.8%) patients. Seven (0.3%) patients had previous COVID-19 infection.

Table 1.

Patient characteristics

Baseline characteristicsNo flares(n = 1887, %)Flares within 0—3 months of 1st vaccine dose (n= 272, %)Flares outside of 0 – 3 months after 1st vaccine dose (n = 180, %)Age (median years, IQR)64 (53, 71)61 (50, 69)65 (55, 71)RaceChinese1386 (73)206 (76)129 (72)Malay193 (10)28 (10)20 (11)Indian195 (10)27 (10)26 (14)GenderFemale1367 (72)200 (74)117 (65)Vaccine typePfizer/BioNTech1713 (92)239 (90)160 (90)Moderna149 (8)28 (10)18 (10)DiagnosisRheumatoid Arthritis831 (44)139 (51)93 (52)Systemic Lupus Erythematosus269 (14)20 (7)9 (5)Psoriatic Arthritis225 (12)42 (15)29 (16)Spondyloarthropathies141 (7)21 (7)17 (9)Sjogren’s Syndrome114 (6)15 (6)8 (4)Systemic sclerosis94 (5)4 (1)6 (3)Baseline Physician Disease ActivityRemission1007 (53)99 (36)63 (35)Low Disease Activity731 (39)128 (47)97 (54)Moderate Disease Activity134 (7)40 (15)20 (11)High Disease Activity15 (1)5 (2)0

452 (19%) flares were recorded during 9798.8 patient-months [4.6/100 patient-months, median (IQR) follow up duration 4.2 (3.3, 5.3) months], of which 272 (11.6%) patients flared within the 3-month period of interest and 180 (7.7%) flared outside of the 3-month period (Table 1). Median (IQR) time-to-flare was 40.5 (18, 56.6) days. 60 (22.1%) were mild and self-limiting, 170 (62.5%) were mild-moderate and 42 (15.4%) were severe. 190 (69.8%) of those who flared required escalation of treatment and 15 (5.5%) required hospital admission. 239 (10.2%) had improved disease activity after the vaccine.

On multivariate Cox regression analysis, patients in the oldest age tertile [median (IQR) 74 (71, 79) years] were less likely to flare [HR 0.80 (95% CI 0.63, 1.00), p = 0.05] Patients with inflammatory arthritis (compared with connective tissue disease, vasculitis and others) and patients with baseline active disease were more likely to flare [HR 1.72 (95% CI 1.35, 2.20), p < 0.001 and 1.82 (95% CI 1.39, 2.39), p < 0.001 respectively]

Conclusion

There was a moderately high rate of AIIRD flares after mRNA vaccination; however, there was no clustering of flares in the immediate post-vaccine period to suggest causality. Older patients were less likely to flare, while those with inflammatory arthritis and active disease at baseline were more likely to flare.

Disclosure of Interests

Margaret Ma Grant/research support from: Support grant from multiple companies for the Singapore Biologics registry, Amelia Santosa Speakers bureau: Amgen Talk, Consultant of: Pfizer ad board, Kok Ooi Kong: None declared, Chuanhui Xu: None declared, Johnston Tang Gin Xiang: None declared, Gim Gee Teng Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingleheim, Anselm Mak Speakers bureau: J&J and GSK, Grant/research support from: GSK - the supported studies programme, Sen Hee Tay: None declared, Victoria Wei Wen Ng: None declared, Joshua Zhi En Koh: None declared, Warren Fong Speakers bureau: speaker for Abbvie, DKSH, GSK, Novartis, Li-Ching Chew Speakers bureau: pfizer and Abbvie, Consultant of: Pfizer and Abbvie Advisory Board meeting, Grant/research support from: Abbvie educational grant for ultrasound conference, Andrea Low Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingeilheim, Consultant of: Consultant/steering group committee for BI and J&J, annie law: None declared, Yih Jia Poh: None declared, Siaw Ing Yeo Grant/research support from: Multiple pharmaceutical companies for the support of the National Biologics Registry, Ying Ying Leung Speakers bureau: Abbvie, DKSH, Jassen, Novartis and Pfizer, Wei-Rui Goh: None declared, Chuah Tyng Yu: None declared, Nur Emillia Roslan: None declared, Stanley Angkodjojo Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingeilheim, Consultant of: Abbvie and DKSH, Kee Fong Phang: None declared, Thaschawee Arkachaisri: None declared, Melonie Sriranganathan: None declared, Teck Choon TAN: None declared, Peter Cheung Consultant of: Ad board for Boehringer Ingleheim, novartis, janssen and abbvie, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Manjari Lahiri Speakers bureau: J&J, DSKH, Consultant of: DSKH, Gilead, Grant/research support from: Multiple pharma companies contributed to the Singapore Biologics registry

Novartis

Humoral immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination in people living with HIV receiving suppressive antiretroviral therapy

Humoral responses to COVID-19 vaccines in people living with HIV (PLWH) remain incompletely understood. We measured circulating antibodies against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, ACE2 displacement and live viral neutralization activities one month following the first and second COVID-19 vaccine doses in 100 adult PLWH and 152 controls. All PLWH were receiving suppressive antiretroviral therapy, with median CD4+ T-cell counts of 710 (IQR 525-935) cells/mm 3 . Nadir CD4+ T-cell counts ranged as low as <10 (median 280; IQR 120-490) cells/mm 3 . After adjustment for sociodemographic, health and vaccine-related variables, HIV infection was significantly associated with 0.2 log 10 lower anti-RBD antibody concentrations (p=0.03) and ∼11% lower ACE2 displacement activity (p=0.02), but not lower viral neutralization (p=0.1) after one vaccine dose. Following two doses however, HIV was no longer significantly associated with the magnitude of any response measured. Rather, older age, a higher burden of chronic health conditions, and having received two ChAdOx1 doses (versus a heterologous or dual mRNA vaccine regimen) were independently associated with lower responses. After two vaccine doses, no significant correlation was observed between the most recent or nadir CD4+ T-cell counts and vaccine responses in PLWH. These results suggest that PLWH with well-controlled viral loads on antiretroviral therapy and CD4+ T-cell counts in a healthy range will generally not require a third COVID-19 vaccine dose as part of their initial immunization series, though other factors such as older age, co-morbidities, vaccine regimen type, and durability of vaccine responses will influence when this group may benefit from additional doses. Further studies of PLWH who are not receiving antiretroviral treatment and/or who have low CD4+ T-cell counts are needed.

Candidate perceptions of the UK Recorded Consultation Assessment: cross-sectional data linkage study

The Recorded Consultation Assessment (RCA) was rapidly developed to replace the Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA) for UK general practice licencing during COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate candidate perceptions of the RCA and relationships with performance. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of RCA candidates with attitudinal, demographic, and free text response options, undertaking descriptive and factor analysis of quantitative data with qualitative thematic analysis of free text. Binomial regression was used to estimate associations between RCA pass, candidate characteristics and questionnaire responses.645 of 1551 (41.6%) candidates completed a questionnaire; 364 (56.4%) responders permitted linkage with performance and demographic data. Responders and non-responders were similar in exam performance, gender and declared disability but were significantly more likely to be UK graduates (UKG) or white compared with international medical (IMG) or ethnic minority graduates. Responders were positive about the digital platform and support resources. A small overall majority regarded the RCA as a fair assessment; a larger majority reported difficulty collecting, selecting, and submitting cases or felt rushed during recording.Logistic regression showed that ethnicity (white vs minority ethnic: odds ratio [OR] 2.99,95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23, 7.30, p = 0.016), training (UK vs IMG: OR 6.88, 95% CI 2.79, 16.95, p < 0.001), and English as first language (OR 5.11, 0% CI 2.08, 12.56, p < 0.001) were associated with exam success but questionnaire subscales, consultation type submitted, or extent of trainer review were not. The RCA was broadly acceptable but experiences were variable. Candidates experienced challenges and suggested areas for improvement.

Patient-reported Quality of Life following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Primary Kidney Cancer - Results from a Prospective Cohort Study

AIMS

We report on the first prospective series of patient-reported quality of life (QoL) following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for primary kidney cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were treated on a multi-institutional prospective cohort study with 30-42 Gy SBRT in three or five fractions. QoL assessments were carried out using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-15 Palliative (EORTC-QLQ-C15-PAL), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index-19 (FACT FKSI-19) and the EuroQol-5D-3L tools at baseline, 1 week, and 1, 3 and 6 months post-treatment. QoL over time was analysed using linear mixed modelling, pairwise and anchor-based analyses.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were included. No significant reduction in any QoL metric was observed on repeated measures. However, a trend to reduced EORTC global QoL and fatigue was observed at 1 week, with improvement over time in other symptom scores such as pain, appetite and nausea. On pairwise analysis, there were statistically significant reductions in global QoL at 1 week (with subsequent recovery) and dyspnoea at 6 months post-SBRT. Trends to improved pain, appetite and nausea were observed following SBRT. Less than half of patients reported stable or better EORTC global QoL at 1 week. For all other QoL and symptom scales, most patients had reported stable or better scores at all times, with a slight proportional improvement in emotional functioning, nausea, fatigue, pain and appetite, and a slight worsening of physical functioning and dyspnoea over time.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT results in well-preserved QoL in the weeks to months following treatment for primary kidney cancer.

Evaluation of the Sequence Variability within the PCR Primer/Probe Target Regions of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2; initially named 2019-nCoV) is responsible for the recent coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the current standard method for diagnosis from patient samples. As PCR assays are prone to sequence mismatches due to mutations in the viral genome, it is important to verify the genomic variability at primer/probe binding regions periodically. This step-by-step protocol describes a bioinformatics approach for an extensive evaluation of the sequence variability within the primer/probe target regions of the SARS-CoV-2 genome. The protocol can be applied to any molecular diagnostic assay of choice using freely available software programs and the ready-to-use multiple sequence alignment (MSA) file provided. Graphic abstract Overview of the sequence tracing protocol. The figure was created using the Library of Science and Medical Illustrations from somersault18:24 licensed under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Video abstract: https://youtu.be/M1lV1liWE9k.

Presence of mismatches between diagnostic PCR assays and coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 genome

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2; initially named as 2019-nCoV) is responsible for the recent COVID-19 pandemic and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the current standard method for its diagnosis from patient samples. This study conducted a reassessment of published diagnostic PCR assays, including those recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO), through the evaluation of mismatches with publicly available viral sequences. An exhaustive evaluation of the sequence variability within the primer/probe target regions of the viral genome was performed using more than 17 000 viral sequences from around the world. The analysis showed the presence of mutations/mismatches in primer/probe binding regions of 7 assays out of 27 assays studied. A comprehensive bioinformatics approach for in silico inclusivity evaluation of PCR diagnostic assays of SARS-CoV-2 was validated using freely available software programs that can be applied to any diagnostic assay of choice. These findings provide potentially important information for clinicians, laboratory professionals and policy-makers.

FRI0530 THE PREVALENCE AND DETERMINANTS OF SLEEP PROBLEMS IN PATIENTS ACROSS RHEUMATIC DISEASES AND THEIR CORRELATION WITH DISEASE INDICES USING THE ROUTINE ASSESSMENT OF PATIENT INDEX DATA 3 (RAPID3) QUESTIONNAIRE

Background:

Sleep problems are common in rheumatology patients. RAPID3 is a patient reported outcome measure (PROM) that efficiently screens for problems with sleep, anxiety or depression in routine care.

Objectives:

To study prevalence and determinants of self-reported sleep problems across rheumatic diseases in Rheumatology clinics in Singapore, and its correlation with disease indices.

Methods:

RAPID3 questionnaire was filled electronically over 6 months. Demographic data and SNOWMED diagnoses codes were matched through hospital electronic medical records. RAPID3 comprised of 3 questions measuring the extent of difficulty getting a good night’s sleep and dealing with anxiety or depression. Significant problems were considered if they had “much difficulty” or were “unable to do” the component. The relationship of sleep with anxiety, depression, physical function (measured by modified health assessment questionnaire, mdHAQ), pain and patient global assessment (using visual analogue scale, VAS), was evaluated using Pearson’s correlation. Factors associated with significant sleep problems were evaluated by logistic regression.

Results:

4078 patients [mean (SD) age 55.8 (16.3) years, 67.9% female, 70.6% Chinese] were invited to participate, of which 2625 (64.4%) responded. SNOMED diagnosis codes were available for 1570 (59.8%) patients- majority had inflammatory arthritides (n= 843, 53.7%) (Figure 1).

Mean mdHAQ was 0.3 (0.5), pain VAS was 2.4 (2.3) and global VAS was 2.6 (2.2). Data on disease duration, clinical features and medications were not available. 39.3%, 27.5% and 23.8% had problems with sleep, anxiety and depression respectively; and 7.3%, 4.5% and 4.3% had significant problems respectively. Sleep moderately correlated with anxiety (r=0.463, p<0.001) and depression (r=0.436, p<0.001) and weakly correlated with mdHAQ (r= 0.289, p<0.001), global (r=0.339, p<0.001) and pain VAS (r= 0.314, p<0.001).

In multivariable logistic regression, significant sleep problems were associated with anxiety (OR 4.733, CI 2.172-10.310, p<0.001), mdHAQ score ≥ 1 (OR 2.920, CI 1.691-5.043, p< 0.001) and pain VAS >3 (OR 1.884, CI 1.093-3.247, p=0.023). Patients with osteoarthritis and fibromyalgia were more likely than those with inflammatory arthritides to have significant sleep problems, though we were unable to adjust for body mass index as data were unavailable (Table 1).

Table 1.

Determinants of significant disturbances in sleep in patients with rheumatic diseases

VariablesUnivariableMultivariableOdds ratio (95% CI)p-valueOdds ratio (95% CI)p-valueGenderFemale1.79 (1.245-2.57)0.0021.49 (0.86-2.59)0.16EthnicityChineseRefRefMalay1.04 (0.62-1.73)0.890.73 (0.33-1.61)0.43Indian1.59 (1.03-2.44)0.040.97 (0.49-1.90)0.92Others1.05 (0.62-1.77)0.870.92 (0.43-2.00)0.84Age (years)1.00 (1.00-1.01)0.36--mdHAQ ≥16.25 (4.46-8.75)<0.0012.92 (1.69-5.04)0.001Pain VAS >34.15 (3.07-5.61)<0.0011.88 (1.09-3.25)0.02Global VAS > 34.25 (3.13-5.76)<0.0011.63 (0.95-2.80)0.07Significant anxiety15.99 (10.71- 23.89)<0.0014.73 (2.17-10.31)<0.001Significant depression15.58 (10.35-23.45)<0.0013.02 (1.29-7.10)0.11Primary rheuma-tological diagnosisInflammatory arthritidesRefRefConnective tissue diseases1.18 (0.73-1.90)0.510.9 (0.51-1.59)0.71Crystal arthritides1.06 (0.48-2.33)0.880.83 (0.34-2.03)0.68Osteoarthritis3.09 (1.31-7.32)0.012.96 (1.19-7.36)0.02Fibromyalgia9.05 (2.04-40.05)0.0049.62 (2.11-43.84)0.003Others1.63 (0.82-3.29)0.171.20 (0.58-2.47)0.63

Conclusion:

Sleep problems are common in rheumatology patients and correlate significantly with disease indices and psychological distress. Rheumatologists should routinely screen for sleep difficulties, especially in patients with osteoarthritis and fibromyalgia.

References: -

Acknowledgments:

Nil.

Disclosure of Interests:

Charlotte Tan: None declared, Peter Cheung: None declared, Manjari Lahiri Grant/research support from: Manjari Lahiri is the site principal investigator for the Singapore National Biologics Register, which is a multi-pharmaceutical funded register, in which industry sponsors provide support through the Chapter of Rheumatologists, Singapore. Dr Lahiri does not personally receive any remuneration.

FRI0033 ANTI-CARBAMYLATED PROTEIN POSITIVITY PREDICTS DAS28-REMISSION AT 12 MONTHS IN PATIENTS WITH EARLY RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: RESULTS FROM THE SINGAPORE EARLY ARTHRITIS COHORT

Background:

Anti-carbamylated protein antibody (anti-carp) positivity has been associated with poorer outcomes in Western cohorts of early rheumatoid arthritis; however, it is unknown if this applies to Asians.

Objectives:

We determined whether anti-carp predicted DAS28-remission, disability and radiographic progression in a multi-ethnic Asian ERA cohort.

Methods:

Patients with physician diagnosed ERA (symptom duration ≤1 year) were recruited from the Singapore Early Arthritis Cohort (n= 317) by convenience sampling. Serum anti-carp was measured cross-sectionally using a commercial ELISA (SincereBio). The test was repeated in 40 healthy individuals to establish the optimal sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of RA via a receiver operating curve. Disease activity (DAS28-ESR or DAS28-CRP) was recorded at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. Two independent accessors quantified the radiographic damage at baseline and at follow-up using the modified Sharp van der Heijde score (mSS). We used multivariable logistic regression to determine whether anti-carp predicted the following outcomes; (i) DAS-28 remission at 12 months, (ii) any disability (mHAQ>0) at 12 months and (iii) radiographic progression (any increase in the mSS). In each regression model, we chose covariates known to influence the dependent variable in our cohort or from literature.

Results:

One hundred patients were recruited, of mean age (SD) 49.8 (12.5) years, median (IQR) disease duration 10.2 (6.9-15.1) weeks at cohort entry and baseline median DAS-28 4.5 (2.9-5.9) (Table 1). The anti-carp assay was performed after a median (IQR) disease duration of 2.24 (1.82-3.14) years. 93 patients had baseline hand radiographs and 66 had follow-up hand radiographs after ≥ 12 months. Receiver operating characteristics curve yielded optimal sensitivity (95%) and specificity (60%) for the diagnosis of RA at 1.60OD. Therefore, 60 patients were anti-carp positive and 35 patients (37.2%) were positive for RF, ACPA and anti-carp (Figure 1). Anti-carp positivity independently predicted DAS28-remission at 12 months (OR 3.41, 95% CI 1.08-10.7,p=0.04) (Table 2). Anti-carp positivity did not predict disability at 12 months (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.18-2.07,p=0.43) or radiographic progression (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.03-2.03,p=0.18).

Table 1.

Predictors of DAS28-remission at 12 months

VariableN (%)Univariable Logistic RegressionMultivariable Logistic RegressionORpOR (CI)SEpAnti-carp60 (60)3.0 (1.31−6.88)0.013.41 (1.08−10.7)1.990.04SerologyRF and ACPA negative31 (33.0)RefEither RF or ACPA positive11 (11.7)0.99 (0.25−3.93)0.991.10 (0.17−7.04)1.040.92RF and ACPA positive52 (55.3)1.12 (0.45−2.75)0.800.89 (0.28−2.81)0.520.84Baseline DAS28Remission17 (17.4)RefLow DA10 (10.2)0.50 (0.05−4.67)0.540.13 (0.01−1.67)0.170.12Mod DA32 (32.7)0.29 (0.05−1.65)0.160.10 (0.02−0.68)0.100.02High DA39 (39.8)0.18 (0.04−0.90)0.040.06 (0.01−0.41)0.06<0.01Combination csDMARDs or biologic DMARD74 (74)1.13 (0.46−2.76)0.801.97 (0.58−6.67)1.230.28Radiographic damage at baseline11 (20)1.79 (0.65−4.95)0.261.27 (0.33-4.95)0.880.73Tertiary education23 (38.3)0.77 (0.34-1.77)0.540.42 (0.12-1.45)0.270.17EthnicityChinese42 (70)RefMalay39 (68.4)0.61 (0.22-1.71)0.350.56 (0.14-2.25)0.400.41Indian8 (13.3)0.60 (0.20-1.77)0.350.79 (0.20-3.13)0.560.74Females46 (76.7)0.43 (0.17-1.11)0.080.48 (0.13-1.85)0.330.29

Conclusion:

Contrary to previous studies done on Western cohorts where anti-carp predicted worse outcomes, anti-carp positivity predicted DAS28-remission at 12 months in our multi-ethnic Asian cohort. This suggests that different genetic and environmental determinants account for anti-carp expression in patients with RA.

Disclosure of Interests:

Jiacai Cho: None declared, Anselm Mak Speakers bureau: Professor Anselm Mak has been paid as a speaker for Johnson & Johnson., Sachin Agrawal: None declared, Preeti Dhanasekaran: None declared, Lay Kheng Teoh: None declared, Peter Cheung: None declared, Manjari Lahiri Grant/research support from: Manjari Lahiri is the site principal investigator for the Singapore National Biologics Register, which is a multi-pharmaceutical funded register, in which industry sponsors provide support through the Chapter of Rheumatologists, Singapore. Dr Lahiri does not personally receive any remuneration.

The Use of Mononucleosome Immunoprecipitation for Analysis of Combinatorial Histone Post-translational Modifications and Purification of Nucleosome-Interacting Proteins

The nucleosome is the principal structural unit of chromatin. Although many studies focus on individual histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) in isolation, it is important to recognize that multiple histone PTMs can function together or cross-regulate one another within the nucleosome context. In addition, different modifications or histone-binding surfaces can synergize to stabilize the binding of nuclear factors to nucleosomes. To facilitate these types of studies, we present here a step-by-step protocol for isolating high yields of mononucleosomes for biochemical analyses. Furthermore, we discuss differences and variations of the basic protocol used in different publications and characterize the relative abundance of selected histone PTMs and chromatin-binding proteins in the different chromatin fractions obtained by this method.

Comparison of facet joint violation in lumbar posterior spinal instrumentation using different techniques including cortical bone trajectory

Study background:

A retrospective study to compare the rate of facet joint violation (FJV) in lumbar posterior spinal instrumentation using open pedicle screw, percutaneous pedicle screw, and cortical bone trajectory (CBT) technique. CBT is a new posterior spinal instrumentation technique in which a more caudal entry point can minimize iatrogenic damage to the cranial facet joint. Only one recent study reports incidence of FJV of 11%; however, no previous reports comment on radiological outcomes comparing to traditional open and percutaneous screws.

Methods:

We reviewed 90 patients who underwent lumbar posterior spinal instrumentation from January 2016 to June 2017. Postoperative computer tomography scans were performed to evaluate FJV. Incidence of FJV was graded by three reviewers according to Seo classification.

Results:

Totally, 446 screws (open 43.4%, percutaneous 37.8%, CBT 18.9%) were inserted. Among these, 6.3% (28/446) had screw head or rod in contact with facet joint and 0.9% (4/446) had screws directly invaded the facet joint. Overall, FJV was 7.2% (CTB = 3.4%, open = 10.4%, and percutaneous = 4.5%, p = 0.075).

Conclusion:

CBT technique has potential advantage in reducing FJV. It has a unique entry site at lateral aspect of pars interarticular with a caudomedial to craniolateral pathway. It is a reasonable alternative to open or percutaneous techniques in lumbar posterior spinal instrumentation.

Results of 15 Gy HDR-BT boost plus EBRT in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: Analysis of over 500 patients

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE

To report biochemical control associated with single fraction 15 Gy high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost followed by external beam radiation (EBRT) in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients with intermediate-risk disease treated with a real-time ultrasound-based 15 Gy HDR-BT boost followed by EBRT between 2009 and 2016 at a single quaternary cancer center was performed. Freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF), cumulative incidence of androgen deprivation therapy use for biochemical or clinical failure post-treatment (CI of ADT) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) outcomes were measured.

RESULTS

518 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. Median age at HDR-BT was 67 years (IQR 61-72). 506 (98%) had complete pathologic information available. Of these, 146 (28%) had favorable (FIR) and 360 (69%) had unfavorable (UIR) intermediate-risk disease. 83 (16%) received short course hormones with EBRT + HDR. Median overall follow-up was 5.2 years. FFBF was 91 (88-94)% at 5 years. Five-year FFBF was 94 (89-99)% and 89 (85-94)% in FIR and UIR patients, respectively (p = 0.045). CI of ADT was 4 (2-6)% at 5 years. Five-year CI of ADT was 1 (0-3)% and 5 (2-8)% in FIR and UIR patients, respectively (p = 0.085). MFS was 97 (95-98)% at 5 years. Five-year MFS was 100 (N/A-100)% and 95 (92-98)% in FIR and UIR patients, respectively (p = 0.020).

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort of intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients, 15 Gy HDR-BT boost plus EBRT results in durable biochemical control and low rates of ADT use for biochemical failure.

Prostate-specific Antigen Bounce After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Four Prospective Trials

AIMS

We conducted a pooled analysis of four prospective stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) trials of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer to evaluate the incidence of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce and its correlation with the time-dose-fraction schedule. The correlation between bounce with PSA response at 4 years (nadir PSA < 0.4 ng/ml) and biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) was also explored.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included four treatment groups: 35 Gy/five fractions once per week (QW) (TG-1; n = 84); 40 Gy/five fractions QW (TG-2; n = 100); 40 Gy/five fractions every other day (TG-3; n = 73); and 26 Gy/two fractions QW (TG-4; n = 30). PSA bounce was defined as a rise in PSA by 0.2 ng/ml (nadir + 0.2) or 2 ng/ml (nadir + 2.0) above nadir followed by a decrease back to nadir. Patients with fewer than three follow-up PSA tests were excluded from the pooled analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 287 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 5.0 years. The pooled 5-year cumulative incidence of bounce by nadir + 2.0 was 8%. The 2-year cumulative incidences of PSA bounce by nadir + 0.2 were 28.9, 21, 19.6 and 16.7% (P = 0.12) and by nadir + 2.0 were 7.2, 8, 2.7 and 6.7% (P = 0.32) for TG-1 to TG-4, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that for nadir + 2.0, pre-treatment PSA (odds ratio 0.49; 95% confidence interval 0.26-0.97) correlated with PSA bounce. Although PSA bounce by nadir + 0.2 (odds ratio 0.10; 95% confidence interval 0.04-0.24) and nadir + 2.0 (odds ratio 0.29; 95% confidence interval 0.09-0.93) was associated with a lower probability of PSA response at 4 years, there was no association between bounce by nadir + 0.2 (hazard ratio 0.36; 95% confidence interval 0.08-1.74) or nadir + 2 (hazard ratio 1.77; 95% confidence interval 0.28-11.07) with BFFS.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of PSA bounce was independent of time-dose-fraction schedule for prostate SBRT. One in 13 patients experienced a bounce high enough to be misinterpreted as biochemical failure, and clinicians should avoid early salvage interventions in these patients. There was no association between PSA bounce and BFFS.

Absolute percentage of biopsied tissue positive for Gleason pattern 4 disease (APP4) appears predictive of disease control after high dose rate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy in intermediate risk prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To identify if, in intermediate risk prostate cancer (IR-PCa), the absolute percentage of biopsied tissue positive for pattern 4 disease (APP4) may be a predictor of outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

411 patients with IR-PCa were retrospectively reviewed. APP4 was calculated based on biopsy reports. Multivariable competing risk analysis was then performed on optimized APP4 cutpoints to predict for biochemical failure (BF), androgen deprivation use for BF (ADT-BF) and development of metastases (MD).

RESULTS

Median follow-up for the cohort was 5.2 (Inter Quartile Range: 2.9-6.6) years. Median baseline PSA was 7.3 (5.3-9.8) ng/mL. 234 (56.9%) patients had T1 and 177 (43.1%) had T2 disease. Median APP4 was 2.00 (0.75-7.50)%. 38 (9.3%) patients experienced BF. The optimal cutpoint of APP4 for BF was >3.3% with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.66. 17 (4.1%) received ADT-BF. The ADT-BF cutpoint was >6.6% with an AUC of 0.72. Eight (2.0%) developed MD. The MD cutpoint was >17.5% with an AUC of 0.86. Using APP4 >3.3 vs ≤ 3.3, log-transformed baseline PSA ln(PSA) (HR 2.5, 1.1-6.1; p = 0.037) and APP4 (HR 2.3, 1.1-4.7; p = 0.031) predicted for BF. Using APP4 >6.6 vs ≤ 6.6, ln(PSA) (HR 4.2, 1.4-12.4; p = 0.010) and APP4 (HR 3.7, 1.4-10.0; p = 0.009) were predictive of ADT-BF. APP4 >17.5 vs ≤ 17.5 alone was predictive of MD (HR 25.7, 4.9-135.3; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

APP4 cutpoints of >3.3%, >6.6% and >17.5% were strongly associated with increased risk of BF, ADT-BF and developing MD respectively. These findings may inform future practice when treating IR-PCa but require external validation.