Arterial Resection for Pancreatic Cancer: Feasibility and Current Standing in a High-Volume Center

Background

Arterial resection (AR) during pancreatectomy for curative R0 resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a controversial procedure with high morbidity.

Objective

To investigate the feasibility and oncological outcomes of pancreatectomy combined with AR at a high-volume center for pancreatic surgery.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed our experience in PDAC patients, who underwent pancreatic resection with AR and/or venous resection (VR) between 2007 and 2021.

Results

In total 259 PDAC patients with borderline resectable (n = 138) or locally advanced (n = 121) PDAC underwent vascular resection during tumor resection. From these, 23 patients had AR (n = 4 due to intraoperative injury, n = 19 due to suspected arterial infiltration). However, 12 out of 23 patients (52.2%) underwent simultaneous VR including 1 case with intraoperative arterial injury. In comparison, 11 patients (47.8%) underwent AR only including 3 intraoperative arterial injury patients. Although the operation time and bleeding rate of patients with AR were respectively longer and higher than in VR, no significant difference was detected in postoperative complications between VR and AR (P = 0.11). The final histopathological findings of PDAC patients were similar, including M stage, regional lymph node metastases, and R0 margin resection. The mortality of the entire cohort was 6.2% (16/259), with a tendency to increase mortality in the AR cohort, yet without statistical significance (VR: 5% vs AR: 21.1%; P = 0.05). Although 19 (82.6%) patients had PDAC in the final histopathology, only 6 were confirmed to have infiltrated arteria. The microscopic distribution of PDAC in these infiltrated arterial walls on hematoxylin-eosin staining was classified into 3 patterns. Strikingly, the perivascular nerves frequently exhibited perineural invasion.

Conclusions

AR can be performed in high-volume centers for pancreatic surgery with an acceptable morbidity, which is comparable to that of VR. However, the likelihood of arterial infiltration seems to be rather overestimated, and as such, AR might be avoidable or replaced by less invasive techniques such as divestment during PDAC surgery.

Diabetes and Weight Loss Are Associated With Malignancies in Patients With Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The role of diabetes in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) is not known. We investigated the prevalence of diabetes among patients with resected IPMNs and the association between diabetes, clinical and morphological features, and high-grade dysplasia or invasive cancer.

METHODS

We collected clinical, pathology, laboratory, and demographic data from 134 patients who underwent pancreatic resection for IPMN from a referral center in Germany. We identified 50 patients with diabetes (37%).

RESULTS

Higher proportions of patients with diabetes were male and older, but did not have increased body mass index, compared to patients without diabetes. Diabetes was significantly associated with main-duct involvement (odds ratio [OR], 2.827; 95% CI, 1.059-7.546; P = .038) and high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma (OR, 2.692; 95% CI, 1.283-5.651; P = .009). Risk of high-grade dysplasia or invasive cancer was even higher in patients with new-onset or worsening diabetes (OR, 4.615; 95% CI, 1.423-14.698; P = .011). Fifty-eight percent of patients (18/31) with weight loss at diagnosis had diabetes vs 32% of patients (31/97) without weight loss (P = .009). However, when the analysis was restricted to IPMNs with low-grade dysplasia, weight loss and diabetes were no longer associated (42% [5/12] vs 21% [9/44]; P = .133).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with IPMNs, diabetes is associated with increased risk of main duct involvement and high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma. Studies are needed to determine the relationship between diabetes and progression of IPMNs, which might lead to strategies for early detection and prevention of invasive cancer. Findings from this study should be considered in the guidelines for management of IPMN.