Randomized Phase III Study of Docetaxel Compared With Paclitaxel in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Purpose

This randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label, phase III study compared docetaxel versus paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer that had progressed after an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimen.

Patients and Methods

Patients (n = 449) were randomly assigned to receive either docetaxel 100 mg/m2(n = 225) or paclitaxel 175 mg/m2(n = 224) on day 1, every 21 days until tumor progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.

Results

In the intent-to-treat population, both the median overall survival (OS, 15.4 v 12.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.73; P = .03) and the median time to progression (TTP, 5.7 months v 3.6 months; HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.33 to 2.02; P < .0001) for docetaxel were significantly longer than for paclitaxel, and the overall response rate (ORR, 32% v 25%; P = .10) was higher for docetaxel. These results were confirmed by multivariate analyses. The incidence of treatment-related hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities was greater for docetaxel than for paclitaxel; however, quality-of-life scores were not statistically different between treatment groups over time.

Conclusion

Docetaxel was superior to paclitaxel in terms of OS and TTP. ORR was higher for docetaxel. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities occurred more frequently in the docetaxel group. The global quality-of-life scores were similar for both agents over time.

Low proliferative rate of invasive node-negative breast cancer predicts for a favorable outcome: a prospective evaluation of 669 patients

This study was designed to compare outcome in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) in women with histologically negative axillary lymph nodes and documented low proliferative rate cancer to other well-defined prognostic factors including type of adjuvant treatment. Between 1988 and 1998, we studied 669 patients with invasive node-negative breast cancer up to 5 cm in size and low proliferative rate measured by flow cytometry to determine S-phase fraction (SPF) or by histochemistry (Ki67/MIB1). At a median follow-up of 53 months, 5-year DFS for the entire group was 94% and did not differ significantly by type of systemic adjuvant treatment: none (133 patients, 95% DFS), tamoxifen (441 patients, 94% DFS), or chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (95 patients, 92% DFS). In a multivariate prognostic factor analysis, only tumor size was significant; 5-year DFS was 96% for T1N0 cancer versus 89% for T2N0 cancer (P = 0.01). We have prospectively confirmed that a low rate of proliferation as measured by SPF or MIB1 determination confers an excellent prognosis in invasive node-negative breast cancer up to 5 cm in size, regardless of adjuvant treatment.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the hematopoietic growth factor PIXY321 after moderate-dose fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide in stage II and III breast cancer

PURPOSE

To measure the effect of PIXY321 (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor/interleukin-3 S. cerevisiae fusion protein) on the incidence, duration, and complications of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia after moderate-dose fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2), doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2), and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2) (FAC) chemotherapy in patients with stage II and III breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial, 71 women were to receive four 21-day cycles of treatment with moderate-dose FAC chemotherapy by short intravenous infusion on day 1, followed by either placebo or PIXY321 (375 microg/m(2) subcutaneously twice a day) on days 3 to 15. All patients were to receive prophylactic oral ciprofloxacin when the absolute neutrophil count was less than 1,000/microL.

RESULTS

PIXY321 significantly reduced the incidence and duration of grade 3 and grade 4 neutropenia in cycles 1 and 2 and the duration of grade 3 neutropenia in cycles 1 through 4. In cycles 3 and 4, grade 3 thrombocytopenia was significantly more common with PIXY321 (P <.05). Two patients, both in the PIXY321 group, required platelet transfusions. Fever and hospitalization for intravenous antibiotics were significantly more common in the PIXY321 group during cycle 1 only. More patients in the PIXY321 group achieved hematologic recovery by day 22 in cycles 1 through 3, and time to recovery was significantly shorter with PIXY321 in all cycles. FAC dose intensity was roughly 2% higher in the PIXY321 group (P = NS). Nonhematologic events of any intensity occurring with significantly greater overall frequency in the PIXY321 group included injection-site reactions, fever, chills, abdominal pain, and arthralgia. No patient died on study or within 30 days of her last dose of study drug.

CONCLUSION

PIXY321 decreased the incidence and duration of FAC-induced grade 3 and 4 neutropenia in cycles 1 and 2 and significantly shortened the time to hematologic recovery in all cycles. However, it produced more systemic toxicity as well as thrombocytopenia in cycles 3 and 4.

A phase II study of piritrexim in patients with advanced squamous head and neck cancer

Piritrexim (PTX) is a newly developed lipid-soluble folate antagonist that crosses the cell membrane by a simple, rapid, carrier-independent diffusion process. A Phase II study was conducted to evaluate the activity of PTX in 34 patients with previously chemotherapy-naive squamous cell cancer of the head and neck area (SCCHN). Among them, 30 patients had received previous radiation therapy and/or surgery. Of 33 patients who could be examined, 3 had a complete response (CR), 6 had a partial response (PR), 11 had no change, and 13 had disease progression. The overall response rate (CR + PR) was 27% (9 of 33; 95% confidence interval, 13% to 46%). The response duration ranged from 36 to 360 + days (median, 162) and was similar to the best studies reported with methotrexate. The three most severe side effects (Grades 3 and 4 by World Health Organization criteria) were leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and mucositis. These occurred in 41%, 26%, and 15% of the 34 patients, respectively. This study established PTX as an agent with some activity in SCCHN. The use of PTX in combination chemotherapeutic regimens needs to be explored.