The MARECA (national study of management of breast cancer locoregional recurrence and oncological outcomes) study: protocol for a prospective, multicentre cohort study

Background

Despite a UK 5-year breast cancer survival rate of 86.6%, patients may develop breast cancer recurrence within the same breast after breast conserving surgery, as well as in the remaining skin or chest wall after mastectomy or in the ipsilateral lymph glands. These recurrences, collectively termed locoregional recurrence (LRR), occur in around 8% of patients within 10 years of their original diagnosis. Currently, there is a lack of robust information on the presentation and prevalence of LRR with no UK-specific clinical guidelines available for the optimal management of this patient group. Additionally, there is a need to identify patterns of LRR presentation and their progression, which will enable prognostic factors to be determined. This will subsequently enable the tailoring of treatment and improve patient outcome.

Methods

The MARECA study is a prospective, multicentre cohort study recruiting patients diagnosed with breast cancer LRR +/- associated distant metastases. Over 50 UK breast units are participating in the study with the aim of recruiting at least 500 patients over a recruitment period of 24 months. The data collected will detail the tumour pathology, imaging results, surgical treatment, radiotherapy and systemic therapy of the primary and recurrent breast cancer. Study follow-up will be for up to 5 years following LRR diagnosis to determine subsequent oncological outcomes and evaluate potential prognostic factors.

Discussion

This study will address the current knowledge gap and identify subgroups of patients who have less successful treatment outcomes. The results will determine the current management of LRR and the prognosis of patients diagnosed with breast cancer LRR +/- distant metastases in the UK, with the aim of establishing best practice and informing future national guidelines. The results will direct future research and inform the design of additional interventional trials and translational studies.

Factors associated with fragility fractures in type 2 diabetes: An analysis of the randomised controlled Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study

AIMS

Fracture risk is elevated in some type 2 diabetes patients. Bone fragility may be associated with more clinically severe type 2 diabetes, although prospective studies are lacking. It is unknown which diabetes-related characteristics are independently associated with fracture risk. In this post-hoc analysis of fracture data from the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) trial (ISRCTN#64783481), we hypothesised that diabetic microvascular complications are associated with bone fragility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The FIELD trial randomly assigned 9795 type 2 diabetes participants (aged 50-75 years) to receive oral co-micronised fenofibrate 200 mg (n = 4895) or placebo (n = 4900) daily for a median of 5 years. We used Cox proportional hazards models to identify baseline sex-specific diabetes-related parameters independently associated with incident fractures.

RESULTS

Over 49,470 person-years, 137/6138 men experienced 141 fractures and 143/3657 women experienced 145 fractures; incidence rates for the first fracture of 4∙4 (95% CI 3∙8-5∙2) and 7∙7 per 1000 person-years (95% CI 6∙5-9∙1), respectively. Fenofibrate had no effect on fracture outcomes. In men, baseline macrovascular disease (HR 1∙52, 95% CI 1∙05-2∙21, p = 0∙03), insulin use (HR 1∙62, HR 1∙03-2∙55, p = 0∙03), and HDL-cholesterol (HR 2∙20, 95% CI 1∙11-4∙36, p = 0∙02) were independently associated with fracture. In women, independent risk factors included baseline peripheral neuropathy (HR 2∙04, 95% CI 1∙16-3∙59, p = 0∙01) and insulin use (HR 1∙55, 95% CI 1∙02-2∙33, p = 0∙04).

CONCLUSIONS

Insulin use and sex-specific complications (in men, macrovascular disease; in women, neuropathy) are independently associated with fragility fractures in adults with type 2 diabetes.

A single dose of valproic acid improves neurologic recovery and decreases brain lesion size in swine subjected to an isolated traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND

We lack specific treatments for traumatic brain injury (TBI), which remains the leading cause of trauma-related morbidity and mortality. Treatment with valproic acid (VPA) improves outcomes in models of severe TBI with concurrent hemorrhage. However, it is unknown if VPA will have similar benefits after isolated nonlethal TBI, which is the more common clinical scenario. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of VPA treatment in a preclinical isolated TBI swine model on neurologic outcomes and brain lesion size and to perform detailed pharmacokinetic analyses for a future clinical trial.

METHODS

Yorkshire swine (n = 10; 5/cohort) were subjected to TBI (8-mm controlled cortical impact). An hour later, we randomized them to receive VPA (150 mg/kg) or saline placebo (control). Neuroseverity scores were assessed daily (0 [normal] to 36 [comatose]), brain lesion size was measured on postinjury 3, and serial blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic studies.

RESULTS

Physiologic parameters and laboratory values were similar in both groups. Valproic acid-treated animals demonstrated significantly better neuroseverity scores on postinjury 1 (control, 9.2 ± 4.4; VPA, 0 ± 0; p = 0.001). Valproic acid-treated animals had significantly smaller brain lesion sizes (mean volume in microliter: control, 3,130 ± 2,166; VPA, 764 ± 208; p = 0.02). Pharmacokinetic data confirmed adequate plasma and tissue levels of VPA.

CONCLUSION

In this clinically relevant model of isolated TBI, a single dose of VPA attenuates neurological impairment and decreases brain lesion size.

The Potential Impact of COVID-19 on the Medical School Application

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a significant impact on the medical community. It is suspected that the pandemic will impact the medical school application process due to effects on standardized testing, performance measures, financial burdens, and interview strategies. It is important to consider these issues early to optimize success of future strategies and mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on the application cycle.

Protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing arthroscopic hip surgery to physiotherapy-led care for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI): the Australian FASHIoN trial

BACKGROUND

Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI), a hip disorder affecting active young adults, is believed to be a leading cause of hip osteoarthritis (OA). Current management approaches for FAI include arthroscopic hip surgery and physiotherapy-led non-surgical care; however, there is a paucity of clinical trial evidence comparing these approaches. In particular, it is unknown whether these management approaches modify the future risk of developing hip OA. The primary objective of this randomised controlled trial is to determine if participants with FAI who undergo hip arthroscopy have greater improvements in hip cartilage health, as demonstrated by changes in delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of cartilage (dGEMRIC) index between baseline and 12 months, compared to those who undergo physiotherapy-led non-surgical management.

METHODS

This is a pragmatic, multi-centre, two-arm superiority randomised controlled trial comparing hip arthroscopy to physiotherapy-led management for FAI. A total of 140 participants with FAI will be recruited from the clinics of participating orthopaedic surgeons, and randomly allocated to receive either surgery or physiotherapy-led non-surgical care. The surgical intervention involves arthroscopic FAI surgery from one of eight orthopaedic surgeons specialising in this field, located in three different Australian cities. The physiotherapy-led non-surgical management is an individualised physiotherapy program, named Personalised Hip Therapy (PHT), developed by a panel to represent the best non-operative care for FAI. It entails at least six individual physiotherapy sessions over 12 weeks, and up to ten sessions over six months, provided by experienced musculoskeletal physiotherapists trained to deliver the PHT program. The primary outcome measure is the change in dGEMRIC score of a ROI containing both acetabular and femoral head cartilages at the chondrolabral transitional zone of the mid-sagittal plane between baseline and 12 months. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported outcomes and several structural and biomechanical measures relevant to the pathogenesis of FAI and development of hip OA. Interventions will be compared by intention-to-treat analysis.

DISCUSSION

The findings will help determine whether hip arthroscopy or an individualised physiotherapy program is superior for the management of FAI, including for the prevention of hip OA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry reference: ACTRN12615001177549 . Trial registered 2/11/2015 (retrospectively registered).