1
|
Weber JN, Minner-Meinen R, Kaufholdt D. The Mechanisms of Molybdate Distribution and Homeostasis with Special Focus on the Model Plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Molecules 2023; 29:40. [PMID: 38202623 PMCID: PMC10780190 DOI: 10.3390/molecules29010040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
This review article deals with the pathways of cellular and global molybdate distribution in plants, especially with a full overview for the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. In its oxidized state as bioavailable molybdate, molybdenum can be absorbed from the environment. Especially in higher plants, molybdenum is indispensable as part of the molybdenum cofactor (Moco), which is responsible for functionality as a prosthetic group in a variety of essential enzymes like nitrate reductase and sulfite oxidase. Therefore, plants need mechanisms for molybdate import and transport within the organism, which are accomplished via high-affinity molybdate transporter (MOT) localized in different cells and membranes. Two different MOT families were identified. Legumes like Glycine max or Medicago truncatula have an especially increased number of MOT1 family members for supplying their symbionts with molybdate for nitrogenase activity. In Arabidopsis thaliana especially, the complete pathway followed by molybdate through the plant is traceable. Not only the uptake from soil by MOT1.1 and its distribution to leaves, flowers, and seeds by MOT2-family members was identified, but also that inside the cell. the transport trough the cytoplasm and the vacuolar storage mechanisms depending on glutathione were described. Finally, supplying the Moco biosynthesis complex by MOT1.2 and MOT2.1 was demonstrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - David Kaufholdt
- Institut für Pflanzenbiologie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Humboldtstrasse 1, D-38106 Braunschweig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Weber JN, Minner-Meinen R, Behnecke M, Biedendieck R, Hänsch VG, Hercher TW, Hertweck C, van den Hout L, Knüppel L, Sivov S, Schulze J, Mendel RR, Hänsch R, Kaufholdt D. Moonlighting Arabidopsis molybdate transporter 2 family and GSH-complex formation facilitate molybdenum homeostasis. Commun Biol 2023; 6:801. [PMID: 37532778 PMCID: PMC10397214 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05161-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Molybdenum (Mo) as essential micronutrient for plants, acts as active component of molybdenum cofactor (Moco). Core metabolic processes like nitrate assimilation or abscisic-acid biosynthesis rely on Moco-dependent enzymes. Although a family of molybdate transport proteins (MOT1) is known to date in Arabidopsis, molybdate homeostasis remained unclear. Here we report a second family of molybdate transporters (MOT2) playing key roles in molybdate distribution and usage. KO phenotype-analyses, cellular and organ-specific localization, and connection to Moco-biosynthesis enzymes via protein-protein interaction suggest involvement in cellular import of molybdate in leaves and reproductive organs. Furthermore, we detected a glutathione-molybdate complex, which reveals how vacuolar storage is maintained. A putative Golgi S-adenosyl-methionine transport function was reported recently for the MOT2-family. Here, we propose a moonlighting function, since clear evidence of molybdate transport was found in a yeast-system. Our characterization of the MOT2-family and the detection of a glutathione-molybdate complex unveil the plant-wide way of molybdate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan-Niklas Weber
- Institute of Plant Biology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Humboldtstrasse 1, D-38106, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Rieke Minner-Meinen
- Institute of Plant Biology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Humboldtstrasse 1, D-38106, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Maria Behnecke
- Institute of Plant Biology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Humboldtstrasse 1, D-38106, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Rebekka Biedendieck
- Institute of Microbiology and Braunschweig Integrated Centre of Systems Biology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Rebenring 56, D-38106, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Veit G Hänsch
- Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, Leibniz Institute for Natural Research and Infection Biology (HKI), Beutenbergstrasse 11a, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, D-07743, Jena, Germany
| | - Thomas W Hercher
- Institute of Plant Biology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Humboldtstrasse 1, D-38106, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Christian Hertweck
- Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, Leibniz Institute for Natural Research and Infection Biology (HKI), Beutenbergstrasse 11a, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, D-07743, Jena, Germany
| | - Lena van den Hout
- Institute of Plant Biology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Humboldtstrasse 1, D-38106, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Lars Knüppel
- Institute of Plant Biology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Humboldtstrasse 1, D-38106, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Simon Sivov
- Institute of Plant Biology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Humboldtstrasse 1, D-38106, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Jutta Schulze
- Institute of Plant Biology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Humboldtstrasse 1, D-38106, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Ralf-R Mendel
- Institute of Plant Biology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Humboldtstrasse 1, D-38106, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Robert Hänsch
- Institute of Plant Biology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Humboldtstrasse 1, D-38106, Braunschweig, Germany.
- Center of Molecular Ecophysiology (CMEP), College of Resources and Environment, , Southwest University, Tiansheng Road No. 2, 400715, Chongqing, Beibei District, PR China.
| | - David Kaufholdt
- Institute of Plant Biology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Humboldtstrasse 1, D-38106, Braunschweig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Minner-Meinen R, Weber JN, Albrecht A, Matis R, Behnecke M, Tietge C, Frank S, Schulze J, Buschmann H, Walla PJ, Mendel RR, Hänsch R, Kaufholdt D. Split-HaloTag imaging assay for sophisticated microscopy of protein-protein interactions in planta. Plant Commun 2021; 2:100212. [PMID: 34746759 PMCID: PMC8555439 DOI: 10.1016/j.xplc.2021.100212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
An ever-increasing number of intracellular multi-protein networks have been identified in plant cells. Split-GFP-based protein-protein interaction assays combine the advantages of in vivo interaction studies in a native environment with additional visualization of protein complex localization. Because of their simple protocols, they have become some of the most frequently used methods. However, standard fluorescent proteins present several drawbacks for sophisticated microscopy. With the HaloTag system, these drawbacks can be overcome, as this reporter forms covalent irreversible bonds with synthetic photostable fluorescent ligands. Dyes can be used in adjustable concentrations and are suitable for advanced microscopy methods. Therefore, we have established the Split-HaloTag imaging assay in plants, which is based on the reconstitution of a functional HaloTag protein upon protein-protein interaction and the subsequent covalent binding of an added fluorescent ligand. Its suitability and robustness were demonstrated using a well-characterized interaction as an example of protein-protein interaction at cellular structures: the anchoring of the molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis complex to filamentous actin. In addition, a specific interaction was visualized in a more distinctive manner with subdiffractional polarization microscopy, Airyscan, and structured illumination microscopy to provide examples of sophisticated imaging. Split-GFP and Split-HaloTag can complement one another, as Split-HaloTag represents an alternative option and an addition to the large toolbox of in vivo methods. Therefore, this promising new Split-HaloTag imaging assay provides a unique and sensitive approach for more detailed characterization of protein-protein interactions using specific microscopy techniques, such as 3D imaging, single-molecule tracking, and super-resolution microscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rieke Minner-Meinen
- Institut für Pflanzenbiologie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Humboldtstrasse 1, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Jan-Niklas Weber
- Institut für Pflanzenbiologie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Humboldtstrasse 1, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Andreas Albrecht
- Institut für Physikalische und Theoretische Chemie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Hagenring 30.023c, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Rainer Matis
- Institut für Physikalische und Theoretische Chemie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Hagenring 30.023c, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Maria Behnecke
- Institut für Pflanzenbiologie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Humboldtstrasse 1, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Cindy Tietge
- Institut für Pflanzenbiologie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Humboldtstrasse 1, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Stefan Frank
- Institut für Pflanzenbiologie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Humboldtstrasse 1, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Jutta Schulze
- Institut für Pflanzenbiologie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Humboldtstrasse 1, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Henrik Buschmann
- Botany Department, Universität Osnabrück, Barbara Strasse 11, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Peter Jomo Walla
- Institut für Physikalische und Theoretische Chemie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Hagenring 30.023c, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Ralf-R. Mendel
- Institut für Pflanzenbiologie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Humboldtstrasse 1, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Robert Hänsch
- Institut für Pflanzenbiologie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Humboldtstrasse 1, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
- Center of Molecular Ecophysiology (CMEP), College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Tiansheng Road No. 2, Beibei District, 400715 Chongqing, P.R. China
- Corresponding author
| | - David Kaufholdt
- Institut für Pflanzenbiologie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Humboldtstrasse 1, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Weber JN, Kaufholdt D, Minner-Meinen R, Bloem E, Shahid A, Rennenberg H, Hänsch R. Impact of wildfires on SO 2 detoxification mechanisms in leaves of oak and beech trees. Environ Pollut 2021; 272:116389. [PMID: 33433339 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Frequency and intensity of wildfire occurrences are dramatically increasing worldwide due to global climate change, having a devastating effect on the entire ecosystem including plants. Moreover, distribution of fire-smoke can influence the natural environment over very long distances, i.e. hundreds of kilometres. Dry plant matter contains 0.1-0.9% (w/w) sulphur, which is mainly released during combustion into the atmosphere as sulphur dioxide (SO2) resulting in local concentrations of up to 3000 nL L-1. SO2 is a highly hazardous gas, which enters plants mostly via the stomata. Toxic sulphite is formed inside the leaves due to conversion of SO2. Plants as sessile organisms cannot escape from threats, why they evolved an impressive diversity of molecular defence mechanisms. In the present study, two recent wildfires in Germany were evaluated to analyse the effect of SO2 released into the atmosphere on deciduous trees: the Meppen peat fire in 2018 and the forest fire close to Luebtheen in 2019. Collected leaf material from beech (Fagus sylvatica) and oak (Quercus robur) was examined with respect to detoxification of sulphur surplus due to the exposure to elevated SO2. An induced stress reaction in both species was indicated by a 1.5-fold increase in oxidized glutathione. In beech leaves, the enzymatic activities of the sulphite detoxification enzymes sulphite oxidase and apoplastic peroxidases were increased 5-fold and a trend of sulphate accumulation was observed. In contrast, oaks did not regulate these enzymes during smoke exposure, however, the constitutive activity is 10-fold and 3-fold higher than in beech. These results show for the first time sulphite detoxification strategies of trees in situ after natural smoke exposure. Beech and oak trees survived short-term SO2 fumigation due to exclusion of toxic gases and different oxidative detoxification strategies. Beeches use efficient upregulation of oxidative sulphite detoxification enzymes, while oaks hold a constitutively high enzyme-pool available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan-Niklas Weber
- Institut für Pflanzenbiologie Technische Universität Braunschweig, Humboldtstraße 1, D-38106, Braunschweig, Germany.
| | - David Kaufholdt
- Institut für Pflanzenbiologie Technische Universität Braunschweig, Humboldtstraße 1, D-38106, Braunschweig, Germany.
| | - Rieke Minner-Meinen
- Institut für Pflanzenbiologie Technische Universität Braunschweig, Humboldtstraße 1, D-38106, Braunschweig, Germany.
| | - Elke Bloem
- Institute for Crop and Soil Science Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Bundesallee 69, D-38116, Braunschweig, Germany.
| | - Afsheen Shahid
- Institut für Forstwissenschaften, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Georges-Köhler Allee 53/54, D-79110, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Heinz Rennenberg
- Institut für Forstwissenschaften, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Georges-Köhler Allee 53/54, D-79110, Freiburg, Germany; Center of Molecular Ecophysiology (CMEP), College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Tiansheng Road No. 2, 400715, Chongqing, Beibei District, PR China.
| | - Robert Hänsch
- Institut für Pflanzenbiologie Technische Universität Braunschweig, Humboldtstraße 1, D-38106, Braunschweig, Germany; Center of Molecular Ecophysiology (CMEP), College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Tiansheng Road No. 2, 400715, Chongqing, Beibei District, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|