1
|
Goldstone RL, Andrade-Lotero EJ, Hawkins RD, Roberts ME. The Emergence of Specialized Roles Within Groups. Top Cogn Sci 2024; 16:257-281. [PMID: 36843212 DOI: 10.1111/tops.12644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2023]
Abstract
Humans routinely form groups to achieve goals that no individual can accomplish alone. Group coordination often brings to mind synchrony and alignment, where all individuals do the same thing (e.g., driving on the right side of the road, marching in lockstep, or playing musical instruments on a regular beat). Yet, effective coordination also typically involves differentiation, where specialized roles emerge for different members (e.g., prep stations in a kitchen or positions on an athletic team). Role specialization poses a challenge for computational models of group coordination, which have largely focused on achieving synchrony. Here, we present the CARMI framework, which characterizes role specialization processes in terms of five core features that we hope will help guide future model development: Communication, Adaptation to feedback, Repulsion, Multi-level planning, and Intention modeling. Although there are many paths to role formation, we suggest that roles emerge when each agent in a group dynamically allocates their behavior toward a shared goal to complement what they expect others to do. In other words, coordination concerns beliefs (who will do what) rather than simple actions. We describe three related experimental paradigms-"Group Binary Search," "Battles of the Exes," and "Find the Unicorn"-that we have used to study differentiation processes in the lab, each emphasizing different aspects of the CARMI framework.
Collapse
|
2
|
Goldstone RL, Dubova M, Aiyappa R, Edinger A. The Spread of Beliefs in Partially Modularized Communities. Perspect Psychol Sci 2024; 19:404-417. [PMID: 38019565 DOI: 10.1177/17456916231198238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Abstract
Many life-influencing social networks are characterized by considerable informational isolation. People within a community are far more likely to share beliefs than people who are part of different communities. The spread of useful information across communities is impeded by echo chambers (far greater connectivity within than between communities) and filter bubbles (more influence of beliefs by connected neighbors within than between communities). We apply the tools of network analysis to organize our understanding of the spread of beliefs across modularized communities and to predict the effect of individual and group parameters on the dynamics and distribution of beliefs. In our Spread of Beliefs in Modularized Communities (SBMC) framework, a stochastic block model generates social networks with variable degrees of modularity, beliefs have different observable utilities, individuals change their beliefs on the basis of summed or average evidence (or intermediate decision rules), and parameterized stochasticity introduces randomness into decisions. SBMC simulations show surprising patterns; for example, increasing out-group connectivity does not always improve group performance, adding randomness to decisions can promote performance, and decision rules that sum rather than average evidence can improve group performance, as measured by the average utility of beliefs that the agents adopt. Overall, the results suggest that intermediate degrees of belief exploration are beneficial for the spread of useful beliefs in a community, and so parameters that pull in opposite directions on an explore-exploit continuum are usefully paired.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L Goldstone
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University
- Program in Cognitive Science, Indiana University
| | | | - Rachith Aiyappa
- Center for Complex Networks and Systems, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University
| | - Andy Edinger
- Program in Cognitive Science, Indiana University
- Center for Complex Networks and Systems, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Flannagan KS, Mills BM, Goldstone RL. The psychophysics of home plate umpire calls. Sci Rep 2024; 14:2735. [PMID: 38302540 PMCID: PMC10834529 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52402-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
We analyze the visual perception task that home plate umpires (N = 121) perform calling balls and strikes (N = 3,001,019) in baseball games, focusing on the topics of perceptual learning and bias in decision-making. In the context of perceptual learning, our results show that monitoring, training, and feedback improve skill over time. In addition, we document two other aspects of umpires' improvement that are revealing with respect to the nature of their perceptual expertise. First, we show that biases in umpires' decision-making persist even as their overall accuracy improves. This suggests that bias and accuracy are orthogonal and that reduction of bias in decision-making requires interventions aimed specifically at this goal. Second, we measure a distinct difference in the rate of skill improvement between older and younger umpires. Younger umpires improve more quickly, suggesting that the decision task umpires engage in becomes routinized over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin S Flannagan
- Department of Political Science, University of California - San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
| | - Brian M Mills
- Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA
| | - Robert L Goldstone
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, 47405, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Weitnauer E, Goldstone RL, Ritter H. Perception and simulation during concept learning. Psychol Rev 2023; 130:1203-1238. [PMID: 37439723 DOI: 10.1037/rev0000433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
A key component of humans' striking creativity in solving problems is our ability to construct novel descriptions to help us characterize novel concepts. Bongard problems (BPs), which challenge the problem solver to come up with a rule for distinguishing visual scenes that fall into two categories, provide an elegant test of this ability. BPs are challenging for both human and machine category learners because only a handful of example scenes are presented for each category, and they often require the open-ended creation of new descriptions. A new type of BP called physical Bongard problems (PBPs) is introduced, which requires solvers to perceive and predict the physical spatial dynamics implicit in the depicted scenes. The perceiving and testing hypotheses on structures (PATHS) computational model, which can solve many PBPs, is presented and compared to human performance on the same problems. PATHS and humans are similarly affected by the ordering of scenes within a PBP. Spatially or temporally juxtaposing similar (relative to dissimilar) scenes promotes category learning when the scenes belong to different categories but hinders learning when the similar scenes belong to the same category. The core theoretical commitments of PATHS, which we believe to also exemplify open-ended human category learning, are (a) the continual perception of new scene descriptions over the course of category learning; (b) the context-dependent nature of that perceptual process, in which the perceived scenes establish the context for the perception of subsequent scenes; (c) hypothesis construction by combining descriptions into explicit rules; and (d) bidirectional interactions between perceiving new aspects of scenes and constructing hypotheses for the rule that distinguishes categories. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Weitnauer
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Program in Cognitive Science, Indiana University
| | - Robert L Goldstone
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Program in Cognitive Science, Indiana University
| | - Helge Ritter
- Center for Cognitive Interaction Technology, Bielefeld University
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Trench M, Tavernini LM, Goldstone RL. Promoting spontaneous analogical transfer by idealizing target representations. Mem Cognit 2023; 51:1497-1510. [PMID: 36943635 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-023-01411-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
Recent results demonstrate that inducing an abstract representation of target analogs at retrieval time aids access to analogous situations with mismatching surface features (i.e., the late abstraction principle). A limitation of current implementations of this principle is that they either require the external provision of target-specific information or demand very high intellectual effort. Experiment 1 demonstrated that constructing an idealized situation model of a target problem increases the rate of correct solutions compared with constructing either concrete simulations or no simulations. Experiment 2 confirmed that these results were based on an advantage for accessing the base analog, and not merely an advantage of idealized simulations for understanding the target problem in its own terms. This target idealization strategy has broader applicability than prior interventions based on the late abstraction principle because it can be achieved by a greater proportion of participants and without the need to receive target-specific information. We present a computational model, SampComp, that predicts successful retrieval of a stored situation to understand a target based on the overlap of a random, but potentially biased, sample of features from each. SampComp is able to account for the relative benefits of base and target idealization, and their interaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Máximo Trench
- Department of Psychology, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Quintral 1250 (8400), Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina.
- Department of Psychology, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Cipolletti, Rio Negro, Argentina.
| | - Lucía Micaela Tavernini
- Department of Psychology, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Quintral 1250 (8400), Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina
- Department of Psychology, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Cipolletti, Rio Negro, Argentina
| | - Robert L Goldstone
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dubova M, Goldstone RL. Carving joints into nature: reengineering scientific concepts in light of concept-laden evidence. Trends Cogn Sci 2023; 27:656-670. [PMID: 37173157 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
A new wave of proposals suggests that scientists must reassess scientific concepts in light of accumulated evidence. However, reengineering scientific concepts in light of data is challenging because scientific concepts affect the evidence itself in multiple ways. Among other possible influences, concepts (i) prime scientists to overemphasize within-concept similarities and between-concept differences; (ii) lead scientists to measure conceptually relevant dimensions more accurately; (iii) serve as units of scientific experimentation, communication, and theory-building; and (iv) affect the phenomena themselves. When looking for improved ways to carve nature at its joints, scholars must take the concept-laden nature of evidence into account to avoid entering a vicious circle of concept-evidence mutual substantiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Dubova
- Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, 1101 E. 10th Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
| | - Robert L Goldstone
- Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, 1101 E. 10th Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 E. 10th Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Galesic M, Barkoczi D, Berdahl AM, Biro D, Carbone G, Giannoccaro I, Goldstone RL, Gonzalez C, Kandler A, Kao AB, Kendal R, Kline M, Lee E, Massari GF, Mesoudi A, Olsson H, Pescetelli N, Sloman SJ, Smaldino PE, Stein DL. Beyond collective intelligence: Collective adaptation. J R Soc Interface 2023; 20:20220736. [PMID: 36946092 PMCID: PMC10031425 DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023] Open
Abstract
We develop a conceptual framework for studying collective adaptation in complex socio-cognitive systems, driven by dynamic interactions of social integration strategies, social environments and problem structures. Going beyond searching for 'intelligent' collectives, we integrate research from different disciplines and outline modelling approaches that can be used to begin answering questions such as why collectives sometimes fail to reach seemingly obvious solutions, how they change their strategies and network structures in response to different problems and how we can anticipate and perhaps change future harmful societal trajectories. We discuss the importance of considering path dependence, lack of optimization and collective myopia to understand the sometimes counterintuitive outcomes of collective adaptation. We call for a transdisciplinary, quantitative and societally useful social science that can help us to understand our rapidly changing and ever more complex societies, avoid collective disasters and reach the full potential of our ability to organize in adaptive collectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirta Galesic
- Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA
- Complexity Science Hub Vienna, 1080 Vienna, Austria
- Vermont Complex Systems Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, VM 05405, USA
| | | | - Andrew M. Berdahl
- School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Dora Biro
- Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK
| | - Giuseppe Carbone
- Department of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management, Politecnico di Bari, Bari 70125, Italy
| | - Ilaria Giannoccaro
- Department of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management, Politecnico di Bari, Bari 70125, Italy
| | - Robert L. Goldstone
- Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| | - Cleotilde Gonzalez
- Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Anne Kandler
- Department of Mathematics, Max-Planck-Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig 04103, Germany
| | - Albert B. Kao
- Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA
- Biology Department, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA 02125, USA
| | - Rachel Kendal
- Centre for Coevolution of Biology and Culture, Durham University, Anthropology Department, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK
| | - Michelle Kline
- Centre for Culture and Evolution, Division of Psychology, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, UK
| | - Eun Lee
- Department of Scientific Computing, Pukyong National University, 45 Yongso-ro, Nam-gu, Busan, 48513, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Alex Mesoudi
- Department of Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn TR10 9FE, UK
| | | | | | - Sabina J. Sloman
- Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
- Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Paul E. Smaldino
- Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA
- Department of Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA 95343, USA
| | - Daniel L. Stein
- Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA
- Department of Physics and Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York, NY 10012, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Andrade-Lotero EJ, Ortiz-Duque JM, Velasco-García JA, Goldstone RL. The division of linguistic labour for offloading conceptual understanding. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2023; 378:20210360. [PMID: 36571123 PMCID: PMC9791490 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The division of linguistic labour (DLL), initially theorized by philosophers, has gained the attention of cognitive scientists in the last decade. Contrary to some controversial philosophical accounts of DLL, we propose that it is an extended mind strategy of offloading conceptual understanding onto other people. In this article, we empirically explore this proposal by providing an exploratory experimental paradigm to search for the mechanisms underwriting DLL and how they may work in practice. We developed a between-subjects experiment in which participants had to categorize two pairs of highly confusable dog breeds after receiving categorization training on just one pair of breeds. In the treatment group, participants were grouped in dyads and were allowed to interact with each other by means of the labels of these four dog breeds. In their queries to trained 'experts', novices frequently used labels to refer to breeds that they could not identify themselves. Experts were highly responsive to their paired novices' queries, and the rates of querying for the two members within a dyad were positively correlated. Independent categorization failure and offloading categorization success lead to subsequent increases in querying by novices, indicating adaptive use of offloading. Self-reports of breed knowledge were higher for experts within a dyad compared to isolated experts. This article is part of the theme issue 'Concepts in interaction: social engagement and inner experiences'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edgar J. Andrade-Lotero
- School of Engineering, Science and Technology, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, 111711, Colombia
| | | | | | - Robert L. Goldstone
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Program in Cognitive Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47401, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dubova M, Galesic M, Goldstone RL. Cognitive Science of Augmented Intelligence. Cogn Sci 2022; 46:e13229. [PMID: 36515371 DOI: 10.1111/cogs.13229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Cognitive science has been traditionally organized around the individual as the basic unit of cognition. Despite developments in areas such as communication, human-machine interaction, group behavior, and community organization, the individual-centric approach heavily dominates both cognitive research and its application. A promising direction for cognitive science is the study of augmented intelligence, or the way social and technological systems interact with and extend individual cognition. The cognitive science of augmented intelligence holds promise in helping society tackle major real-world challenges that can only be discovered and solved by teams made of individuals and machines with complementary skills who can productively collaborate with each other.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mirta Galesic
- Santa Fe Institute.,Complexity Science Hub Vienna.,Vermont Complex Systems Center, University of Vermont
| | - Robert L Goldstone
- Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University.,Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gorman TE, Goldstone RL. An instance-based model account of the benefits of varied practice in visuomotor skill. Cogn Psychol 2022; 137:101491. [PMID: 35901537 DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Exposing learners to variability during training has been demonstrated to improve performance in subsequent transfer testing. Such variability benefits are often accounted for by assuming that learners are developing some general task schema or structure. However much of this research has neglected to account for differences in similarity between varied and constant training conditions. In a between-groups manipulation, we trained participants on a simple projectile launching task, with either varied or constant conditions. We replicate previous findings showing a transfer advantage of varied over constant training. Furthermore, we show that a standard similarity model is insufficient to account for the benefits of variation, but, if the model is adjusted to assume that varied learners are tuned towards a broader generalization gradient, then a similarity-based model is sufficient to explain the observed benefits of variation. Our results therefore suggest that some variability benefits can be accommodated within instance-based models without positing the learning of some schemata or structure.
Collapse
|
11
|
Carvalho PF, Goldstone RL. A Computational Model of Context-Dependent Encodings During Category Learning. Cogn Sci 2022; 46:e13128. [PMID: 35411959 PMCID: PMC9285726 DOI: 10.1111/cogs.13128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Although current exemplar models of category learning are flexible and can capture how different features are emphasized for different categories, they still lack the flexibility to adapt to local changes in category learning, such as the effect of different sequences of study. In this paper, we introduce a new model of category learning, the Sequential Attention Theory Model (SAT‐M), in which the encoding of each presented item is influenced not only by its category assignment (global context) as in other exemplar models, but also by how its properties relate to the properties of temporally neighboring items (local context). By fitting SAT‐M to data from experiments comparing category learning with different sequences of trials (interleaved vs. blocked), we demonstrate that SAT‐M captures the effect of local context and predicts when interleaved or blocked training will result in better testing performance across three different studies. Comparatively, ALCOVE, SUSTAIN, and a version of SAT‐M without locally adaptive encoding provided poor fits to the results. Moreover, we evaluated the direct prediction of the model that different sequences of training change what learners encode and determined that the best‐fit encoding parameter values match learners’ looking times during training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulo F Carvalho
- Human-Computer Interaction Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
| | - Robert L Goldstone
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Goldstone RL. Performance, Well-Being, Motivation, and Identity in an Age of Abundant Data: Introduction to the “Well-Measured Life” Special Issue of Current Directions in Psychological Science. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2022. [DOI: 10.1177/09637214211053834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Our lives are being measured in rapidly increasing ways and frequency. These measurements have beneficial and deleterious effects at both individual and social levels. Behavioral measurement technologies offer the promise of helping us to know ourselves better and to improve our well-being by using personalized feedback and gamification. At the same time, they present threats to our privacy, self-esteem, and motivation. At the societal level, the potential benefits of reducing bias and decision variability by using objective and transparent assessments are offset by threats of systematic, algorithmic bias from invalid or flawed measurements. Considerable technological progress, careful foresight, and continuous scrutiny will be needed so that the positive impacts of behavioral measurement technologies far outweigh the negative ones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L. Goldstone
- Program in Cognitive Science and Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Setzler MD, Goldstone RL. Tonal Emergence: An agent-based model of tonal coordination. Cognition 2021; 221:104968. [PMID: 34952223 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Humans have a remarkable capacity for coordination. Our ability to interact and act jointly in groups is crucial to our success as a species. Joint Action (JA) research has often concerned itself with simplistic behaviors in highly constrained laboratory tasks. But there has been a growing interest in understanding complex coordination in more open-ended contexts. In this regard, collective music improvisation has emerged as a fascinating model domain for studying basic JA mechanisms in an unconstrained and highly sophisticated setting. A number of empirical studies have begun to elucidate coordination mechanisms underlying joint musical improvisation, but these findings have yet to be cached out in a working computational model. The present work fills this gap by presenting Tonal Emergence, an idealized agent-based model of improvised musical coordination. Tonal Emergence models the coordination of notes played by improvisers to generate harmony (i.e., tonality), by simulating agents that stochastically generate notes biased towards maximizing harmonic consonance given their partner's previous notes. The model replicates an interesting empirical result from a previous study of professional jazz pianists: feedback loops of mutual adaptation between interacting agents support the production of consonant harmony. The model is further explored to show how complex tonal dynamics, such as the production and dissolution of stable tonal centers, are supported by agents that are characterized by (i) a tendency to strive toward consonance, (ii) stochasticity, and (iii) a limited memory for previously played notes. Tonal Emergence thus provides a grounded computational model to simulate and probe the coordination mechanisms underpinning one of the more remarkable feats of human cognition: collective music improvisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D Setzler
- Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sloman SJ, Goldstone RL, Gonzalez C. A Social Interpolation Model of Group Problem-Solving. Cogn Sci 2021; 45:e13066. [PMID: 34882823 DOI: 10.1111/cogs.13066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
How do people use information from others to solve complex problems? Prior work has addressed this question by placing people in social learning situations where the problems they were asked to solve required varying degrees of exploration. This past work uncovered important interactions between groups' connectivity and the problem's complexity: the advantage of less connected networks over more connected networks increased as exploration was increasingly required for optimally solving the problem at hand. We propose the Social Interpolation Model (SIM), an agent-based model to explore the cognitive mechanisms that can underlie exploratory behavior in groups. Through results from simulation experiments, we conclude that "exploration" may not be a single cognitive property, but rather the emergent result of three distinct behavioral and cognitive mechanisms, namely, (a) breadth of generalization, (b) quality of prior expectation, and (c) relative valuation of self-obtained information. We formalize these mechanisms in the SIM, and explore their effects on group dynamics and success at solving different kinds of problems. Our main finding is that broad generalization and high quality of prior expectation facilitate successful search in environments where exploration is important, and hinder successful search in environments where exploitation alone is sufficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina J Sloman
- Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University
| | - Robert L Goldstone
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
- Program in Cognitive Science, Indiana University
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
|
16
|
Sang K, Todd PM, Goldstone RL, Hills TT. Simple Threshold Rules Solve Explore/Exploit Trade-offs in a Resource Accumulation Search Task. Cogn Sci 2021; 44:e12817. [PMID: 32065692 DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2018] [Revised: 07/31/2019] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
How, and how well, do people switch between exploration and exploitation to search for and accumulate resources? We study the decision processes underlying such exploration/exploitation trade-offs using a novel card selection task that captures the common situation of searching among multiple resources (e.g., jobs) that can be exploited without depleting. With experience, participants learn to switch appropriately between exploration and exploitation and approach optimal performance. We model participants' behavior on this task with random, threshold, and sampling strategies, and find that a linear decreasing threshold rule best fits participants' results. Further evidence that participants use decreasing threshold-based strategies comes from reaction time differences between exploration and exploitation; however, participants themselves report non-decreasing thresholds. Decreasing threshold strategies that "front-load" exploration and switch quickly to exploitation are particularly effective in resource accumulation tasks, in contrast to optimal stopping problems like the Secretary Problem requiring longer exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ke Sang
- Cognitive Science Program and Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington.,Indeed, Inc
| | - Peter M Todd
- Cognitive Science Program and Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington
| | - Robert L Goldstone
- Cognitive Science Program and Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Often members of a group benefit from dividing the group’s task into separate components, where each member specializes their role so as to accomplish only one of the components. While this division of labor phenomenon has been observed with respect to both manual and cognitive labor, there is no clear understanding of the cognitive mechanisms allowing for its emergence, especially when there are multiple divisions possible and communication is limited. Indeed, maximization of expected utility often does not differentiate between alternative ways in which individuals could divide labor. We developed an iterative two-person game in which there are multiple ways of dividing labor, but in which it is not possible to explicitly negotiate a division. We implemented the game both as a human experimental task and as a computational model. Our results show that the majority of human dyads can finish the game with an efficient division of labor. Moreover, we fitted our computational model to the behavioral data, which allowed us to explain how the perceived similarity between a player’s actions and the task’s focal points guided the players’ choices from one round to the other, thus bridging the group dynamics and its underlying cognitive process. Potential applications of this model outside cognitive science include the improvement of cooperation in human groups, multi-agent systems, as well as human-robot collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edgar Andrade-Lotero
- School of Engineering, Science and Technology, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia
- * E-mail:
| | - Robert L. Goldstone
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Program in Cognitive Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Fyfe ER, de Leeuw JR, Carvalho PF, Goldstone RL, Sherman J, Admiraal D, Alford LK, Bonner A, Brassil CE, Brooks CA, Carbonetto T, Chang SH, Cruz L, Czymoniewicz-Klippel M, Daniel F, Driessen M, Habashy N, Hanson-Bradley CL, Hirt ER, Carbonell VH, Jackson DK, Jones S, Keagy JL, Keith B, Malmquist SJ, McQuarrie B, Metzger KJ, Min MK, Patil S, Patrick RS, Pelaprat E, Petrunich-Rutherford ML, Porter MR, Prescott K, Reck C, Renner T, Robbins E, Smith AR, Stuczynski P, Thompson J, Tsotakos N, Turk JK, Unruh K, Webb JD, Whitehead SN, Wisniewski EC, Zhang KA, Motz BA. ManyClasses 1: Assessing the Generalizable Effect of Immediate Feedback Versus Delayed Feedback Across Many College Classes. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 2021. [DOI: 10.1177/25152459211027575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Psychology researchers have long attempted to identify educational practices that improve student learning. However, experimental research on these practices is often conducted in laboratory contexts or in a single course, which threatens the external validity of the results. In this article, we establish an experimental paradigm for evaluating the benefits of recommended practices across a variety of authentic educational contexts—a model we call ManyClasses. The core feature is that researchers examine the same research question and measure the same experimental effect across many classes spanning a range of topics, institutions, teacher implementations, and student populations. We report the first ManyClasses study, in which we examined how the timing of feedback on class assignments, either immediate or delayed by a few days, affected subsequent performance on class assessments. Across 38 classes, the overall estimate for the effect of feedback timing was 0.002 (95% highest density interval = [−0.05, 0.05]), which indicates that there was no effect of immediate feedback compared with delayed feedback on student learning that generalizes across classes. Furthermore, there were no credibly nonzero effects for 40 preregistered moderators related to class-level and student-level characteristics. Yet our results provide hints that in certain kinds of classes, which were undersampled in the current study, there may be modest advantages for delayed feedback. More broadly, these findings provide insights regarding the feasibility of conducting within-class randomized experiments across a range of naturally occurring learning environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily R. Fyfe
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
| | - Joshua R. de Leeuw
- Department of Cognitive Science, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, New York, USA
| | - Paulo F. Carvalho
- Human-Computer Interaction Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Robert L. Goldstone
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
| | - Janelle Sherman
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
| | - David Admiraal
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
| | - Laura K. Alford
- Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Alison Bonner
- Department of Mathematics, Penn State University Lehigh Valley, Center Valley, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Chad E. Brassil
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
| | | | - Tracey Carbonetto
- Department of Engineering, Penn State University Lehigh Valley, Center Valley, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sau Hou Chang
- School of Education, Indiana University Southeast, New Albany, Indiana, USA
| | - Laura Cruz
- Schreyer Institute for Teaching Excellence, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Frances Daniel
- Department of Psychology, Indiana University Northwest, Gary, Indiana, USA
| | - Michelle Driessen
- Department of Chemistry, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Noel Habashy
- College of Agricultural Sciences, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Carrie L. Hanson-Bradley
- Department of Child, Youth and Family Studies, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
| | - Edward R. Hirt
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
| | | | - Daniel K. Jackson
- Department of Physics, Penn State University Lehigh Valley, Center Valley, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Shay Jones
- Department of Humanities/Communications, Penn State University Harrisburg, Middletown, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jennifer L. Keagy
- Center for Teaching Excellence, Penn State University Harrisburg, Middletown, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Brandi Keith
- Department of Sociology, Indiana University Kokomo, Kokomo, Indiana, USA
| | - Sarah J. Malmquist
- Department of Biology Teaching & Learning, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Barry McQuarrie
- Science and Math Division, University of Minnesota Morris, Morris, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kelsey J. Metzger
- Center for Learning Innovation, University of Minnesota Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Maung K. Min
- Department of Business, Penn State University Lehigh Valley, Center Valley, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sameer Patil
- Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
| | - Ryan S. Patrick
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
- Department of Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
| | | | | | - Meghan R. Porter
- Department of Chemistry, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
| | - Kristina Prescott
- Department of Biology Teaching & Learning, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Cathrine Reck
- Department of Chemistry, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
| | - Terri Renner
- O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
| | - Eric Robbins
- Black School of Business, Penn State University Behrend, Erie, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Adam R. Smith
- School of Business, Indiana University Kokomo, Kokomo, Indiana, USA
| | - Phil Stuczynski
- Black School of Business, Penn State University Behrend, Erie, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jaye Thompson
- Department of Design, Housing, and Apparel, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nikolaos Tsotakos
- School of Science, Engineering, and Technology, Penn State University Harrisburg, Middletown, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Judith K. Turk
- Conservation and Survey Division, School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
| | | | - Jennifer D. Webb
- Department of Art & Design, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota, USA
| | | | | | - Ke Anne Zhang
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
| | - Benjamin A. Motz
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dubova M, Goldstone RL. The Influences of Category Learning on Perceptual Reconstructions. Cogn Sci 2021; 45:e12981. [PMID: 34018243 DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Revised: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
We explore different ways in which the human visual system can adapt for perceiving and categorizing the environment. There are various accounts of supervised (categorical) and unsupervised perceptual learning, and different perspectives on the functional relationship between perception and categorization. We suggest that common experimental designs are insufficient to differentiate between hypothesized perceptual learning mechanisms and reveal their possible interplay. We propose a relatively underutilized way of studying potential categorical effects on perception, and we test the predictions of different perceptual learning models using a two-dimensional, interleaved categorization-plus-reconstruction task. We find evidence that the human visual system adapts its encodings to the feature structure of the environment, uses categorical expectations for robust reconstruction, allocates encoding resources with respect to categorization utility, and adapts to prevent miscategorizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Dubova
- Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Affiliation(s)
- Paulo F. Carvalho
- Human‐Computer Interaction Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
| | - Robert L. Goldstone
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Cognitive Science Program Indiana University Bloomington Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Plancher G, Goldstone RL. How Do People Code Information in Working Memory When Items Share Features? Exp Psychol 2020; 67:169-177. [PMID: 32552545 DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Abstract. A large literature suggests that the way we process information is influenced by the categories that we have learned. We examined whether, when we try to uniquely encode items in working memory, the information encoded depends on the other stimuli being simultaneously learned. Participants were required to memorize unknown aliens, presented one at the time, for immediate recognition of their features. Some aliens, called twins, were organized into pairs that shared every feature (nondiscriminative feature) except one (discriminative feature), while some other aliens, called hermits, did not share feature. We reasoned that if people develop unsupervised categories by creating a category for a pair of aliens, we should observe better feature identification performance for nondiscriminative features compared to hermit features, but not compared to discriminative features. On the contrary, if distinguishing features draw attention, we should observe better performance when a discriminative rather than nondiscriminative feature was probed. Overall, our results suggest that when items share features, people code items in working memory by focusing on similarities between items, establishing clusters of items in an unsupervised fashion not requiring feedback on cluster membership.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaën Plancher
- Laboratoire d'Etude des Mécanismes Cognitifs, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Bron, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
In peer instruction, instructors pose a challenging question to students, students answer the question individually, students work with a partner in the class to discuss their answers, and finally students answer the question again. A large body of evidence shows that peer instruction benefits student learning. To determine the mechanism for these benefits, we collected semester-long data from six classes, involving a total of 208 undergraduate students being asked a total of 86 different questions related to their course content. For each question, students chose their answer individually, reported their confidence, discussed their answers with their partner, and then indicated their possibly revised answer and confidence again. Overall, students were more accurate and confident after discussion than before. Initially correct students were more likely to keep their answers than initially incorrect students, and this tendency was partially but not completely attributable to differences in confidence. We discuss the benefits of peer instruction in terms of differences in the coherence of explanations, social learning, and the contextual factors that influence confidence and accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan G Tullis
- Department of Educational Psychology, University of Arizona, 1430 E. Second St., Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
|
24
|
Lara-Dammer F, Hofstadter DR, Goldstone RL. A computational model of scientific discovery in a very simple world, aiming at psychological realism. J EXP THEOR ARTIF IN 2019. [DOI: 10.1080/0952813x.2019.1592234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Lara-Dammer
- Departamento de Matemática, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Quito, Ecuador
- Center for Research on Concepts and Cognition, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Douglas R. Hofstadter
- Center for Research on Concepts and Cognition, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Robert L. Goldstone
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Best RM, Goldstone RL. Bias to (and away from) the extreme: Comparing two models of categorical perception effects. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2018; 45:1166-1176. [PMID: 30024260 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Categorical perception (CP) effects manifest as faster or more accurate discrimination between objects that come from different categories compared with objects that come from the same category, controlling for the physical differences between the objects. The most popular explanations of CP effects have relied on perceptual warping causing stimuli near a category boundary to appear more similar to stimuli within their own category and/or less similar to stimuli from other categories. Hanley and Roberson (2011), on the basis of a pattern not previously noticed in CP experiments, proposed an explanation of CP effects that relies not on perceptual warping, but instead on inconsistent usage of category labels. Experiments 1 and 2 in this article show a pattern opposite the one Hanley and Roberson pointed out. Experiment 3, using the same stimuli but with different choice statistics (i.e., different probabilities of each face being the target), obtains the same pattern as the one Hanley and Roberson showed. Simulations show that both category label and perceptual models are able to reproduce the patterns of results from both experiments, provided they include information about the choice statistics. This suggests 2 conclusions. First, the results described by Hanley and Roberson should not be taken as evidence in favor of a category label model. Second, given that participants did not receive feedback on their choices, there must be some mechanism by which participants monitor their own choices and adapt to the choice statistics present in the experiment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan M Best
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Formal mathematical reasoning provides an illuminating test case for understanding how humans can think about things that they did not evolve to comprehend. People engage in algebraic reasoning by (1) creating new assemblies of perception and action routines that evolved originally for other purposes (reuse), (2) adapting those routines to better fit the formal requirements of mathematics (adaptation), and (3) designing cultural tools that mesh well with our perception-action routines to create cognitive systems capable of mathematical reasoning (invention). We describe evidence that a major component of proficiency at algebraic reasoning is Rigged Up Perception-Action Systems (RUPAS), via which originally demanding, strategically controlled cognitive tasks are converted into learned, automatically executed perception and action routines. Informed by RUPAS, we have designed, implemented, and partially assessed a computer-based algebra tutoring system called Graspable Math with an aim toward training learners to develop perception-action routines that are intuitive, efficient, and mathematically valid.
Collapse
|
27
|
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Lara-Dammer
- Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Matemática, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Quito, Ecuador
- Center for Research on Concepts and Cognition, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Douglas R. Hofstadter
- Center for Research on Concepts and Cognition, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Robert L. Goldstone
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Conventional wisdom and previous research suggest that similarity judgments and difference judgments are inverses of one another. An exception to this rule arises when both relational similarity and attributional similarity are considered. When presented with choices that are relationally or attributionally similar to a standard, human subjects tend to pick the relationally similar choice as more similar to the standard and as more different from the standard. These results not only reinforce the general distinction between attributes and relations but also show that attributes and relations are dynamically distinct in the processes that give rise to similarity and difference judgments.
Collapse
|
29
|
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L. Goldstone
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Georg Theiner
- Department of Philosophy, Villanova University, Villanova, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Carvalho PF, Goldstone RL. The sequence of study changes what information is attended to, encoded, and remembered during category learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2017; 43:1699-1719. [PMID: 28333507 DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The sequence of study influences how we learn. Previous research has identified different sequences as potentially beneficial for learning in different contexts and with different materials. Here we investigate the mechanisms involved in inductive category learning that give rise to these sequencing effects. Across 3 experiments we show evidence that the sequence of study changes what information learners attend to during learning, what is encoded from the materials studied and, consequently, what is remembered from study. Interleaved study (alternating between presentation of 2 categories) leads to an attentional focus on properties that differ between successive items, leading to relatively better encoding and memory for item properties that discriminate between categories. Conversely, when learners study each category in a separate block (blocked study), learners encode relatively more strongly the characteristic features of the items, which may be the result of a strong attentional focus on sequential similarities. These results provide support for the sequential attention theory proposing that inductive category learning takes place through a process of sequential comparisons between the current and previous items. Different sequences of items change how attention is deployed depending on this basic process. Which sequence results in better or worse learning depends on the match between what is encoded and what is required at test. (PsycINFO Database Record
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulo F Carvalho
- Human-Computer Interaction Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
| | - Robert L Goldstone
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, and Program in Cognitive Science, Indiana University
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
Comparison and reminding have both been shown to support learning and transfer. Comparison is thought to support transfer because it allows learners to disregard non-matching features of superficially different episodes in order to abstract the essential structure of concepts. Remindings promote memory for the individual episodes and generalization because they prompt learners to retrieve earlier episodes during the encoding of later related episodes and to compare across episodes. Across three experiments, we compared the consequences of comparison and reminding on memory and transfer. Participants studied a sequence of related, but superficially different, proverb pairs. In the comparison condition, participants saw proverb pairs presented together and compared their meaning. In the reminding condition, participants viewed proverbs one at a time and retrieved any prior studied proverb that shared the same deep meaning as the current proverb. Experiment 1 revealed that participants in the reminding condition recalled more proverbs than those in the comparison condition. Experiment 2 showed that the mnemonic benefits of reminding persisted over a one-week retention interval. Finally, in Experiment 3, we examined the ability of participants to generalize their remembered information to new items in a task that required participants to identify unstudied proverbs that shared the same meaning as studied proverbs. Comparison led to worse discrimination between proverbs related to studied proverbs and proverbs unrelated to studied proverbs than reminding. Reminding supported better memory for individual instances and transfer to new situations than comparison.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan G Tullis
- Department of Educational Psychology, University of Arizona, 1430 E 2nd Street, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
| | - Robert L Goldstone
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Marghetis T, Landy D, Goldstone RL. Mastering algebra retrains the visual system to perceive hierarchical structure in equations. Cogn Res Princ Implic 2016; 1:25. [PMID: 28180176 PMCID: PMC5256452 DOI: 10.1186/s41235-016-0020-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2016] [Accepted: 10/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Formal mathematics is a paragon of abstractness. It thus seems natural to assume that the mathematical expert should rely more on symbolic or conceptual processes, and less on perception and action. We argue instead that mathematical proficiency relies on perceptual systems that have been retrained to implement mathematical skills. Specifically, we investigated whether the visual system-in particular, object-based attention-is retrained so that parsing algebraic expressions and evaluating algebraic validity are accomplished by visual processing. Object-based attention occurs when the visual system organizes the world into discrete objects, which then guide the deployment of attention. One classic signature of object-based attention is better perceptual discrimination within, rather than between, visual objects. The current study reports that object-based attention occurs not only for simple shapes but also for symbolic mathematical elements within algebraic expressions-but only among individuals who have mastered the hierarchical syntax of algebra. Moreover, among these individuals, increased object-based attention within algebraic expressions is associated with a better ability to evaluate algebraic validity. These results suggest that, in mastering the rules of algebra, people retrain their visual system to represent and evaluate abstract mathematical structure. We thus argue that algebraic expertise involves the regimentation and reuse of evolutionarily ancient perceptual processes. Our findings implicate the visual system as central to learning and reasoning in mathematics, leading us to favor educational approaches to mathematics and related STEM fields that encourage students to adapt, not abandon, their use of perception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler Marghetis
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405-7007 USA
| | - David Landy
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405-7007 USA
| | - Robert L Goldstone
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405-7007 USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Goldstone RL, Lupyan G. Discovering Psychological Principles by Mining Naturally Occurring Data Sets. Top Cogn Sci 2016; 8:548-68. [PMID: 27404718 DOI: 10.1111/tops.12212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2016] [Revised: 03/20/2016] [Accepted: 03/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The very expertise with which psychologists wield their tools for achieving laboratory control may have had the unwelcome effect of blinding psychologists to the possibilities of discovering principles of behavior without conducting experiments. When creatively interrogated, a diverse range of large, real-world data sets provides powerful diagnostic tools for revealing principles of human judgment, perception, categorization, decision-making, language use, inference, problem solving, and representation. Examples of these data sets include patterns of website links, dictionaries, logs of group interactions, collections of images and image tags, text corpora, history of financial transactions, trends in twitter tag usage and propagation, patents, consumer product sales, performance in high-stakes sporting events, dialect maps, and scientific citations. The goal of this issue is to present some exemplary case studies of mining naturally existing data sets to reveal important principles and phenomena in cognitive science, and to discuss some of the underlying issues involved with conducting traditional experiments, analyses of naturally occurring data, computational modeling, and the synthesis of all three methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L Goldstone
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, and Program in Cognitive Science, Indiana University
| | - Gary Lupyan
- Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Subjects were shown simple objects and were asked to reproduce the colors of the objects Even though the objects remained on the screen while subjects reproduced the colors and the objects' shapes were irrelevant to the subjects' task, subjects' color perceptions were influenced by the shape category of an object For example, objects that belonged to categories with redder objects were judged to be more red than identically colored objects belonging to another category Further experiments showed that the object categories that subjects use, rather than being fixed, depend on the objects to which subjects are exposed
Collapse
|
35
|
Carvalho PF, Braithwaite DW, de Leeuw JR, Motz BA, Goldstone RL. An In Vivo Study of Self-Regulated Study Sequencing in Introductory Psychology Courses. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0152115. [PMID: 27003164 PMCID: PMC4803187 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2015] [Accepted: 03/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Study sequence can have a profound influence on learning. In this study we investigated how students decide to sequence their study in a naturalistic context and whether their choices result in improved learning. In the study reported here, 2061 undergraduate students enrolled in an Introductory Psychology course completed an online homework tutorial on measures of central tendency, a topic relevant to an exam that counted towards their grades. One group of students was enabled to choose their own study sequence during the tutorial (Self-Regulated group), while the other group of students studied the same materials in sequences chosen by other students (Yoked group). Students who chose their sequence of study showed a clear tendency to block their study by concept, and this tendency was positively associated with subsequent exam performance. In the Yoked group, study sequence had no effect on exam performance. These results suggest that despite findings that blocked study is maladaptive when assigned by an experimenter, it may actually be adaptive when chosen by the learner in a naturalistic context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulo F Carvalho
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America
| | - David W Braithwaite
- Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Joshua R de Leeuw
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America
| | - Benjamin A Motz
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America
| | - Robert L Goldstone
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Why are some behaviors governed by strong social conventions while others are not? We experimentally investigate two factors contributing to the formation of conventions in a game of impure coordination: the continuity of interaction within each round of play (simultaneous vs. real-time) and the stakes of the interaction (high vs. low differences between payoffs). To maximize efficiency and fairness in this game, players must coordinate on one of two equally advantageous equilibria. In agreement with other studies manipulating continuity of interaction, we find that players who were allowed to interact continuously within rounds achieved outcomes with greater efficiency and fairness than players who were forced to make simultaneous decisions. However, the stability of equilibria in the real-time condition varied systematically and dramatically with stakes: players converged on more stable patterns of behavior when stakes are high. To account for this result, we present a novel analysis of the dynamics of continuous interaction and signaling within rounds. We discuss this previously unconsidered interaction between within-trial and across-trial dynamics as a form of social canalization. When stakes are low in a real-time environment, players can satisfactorily coordinate 'on the fly', but when stakes are high there is increased pressure to establish and adhere to shared expectations that persist across rounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert X. D. Hawkins
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States of America
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Robert L. Goldstone
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Day SB, Motz BA, Goldstone RL. The Cognitive Costs of Context: The Effects of Concreteness and Immersiveness in Instructional Examples. Front Psychol 2015; 6:1876. [PMID: 26648905 PMCID: PMC4665226 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2015] [Accepted: 11/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Prior research has established that while the use of concrete, familiar examples can provide many important benefits for learning, it is also associated with some serious disadvantages, particularly in learners’ ability to recognize and transfer their knowledge to new analogous situations. However, it is not immediately clear whether this pattern would hold in real world educational contexts, in which the role of such examples in student engagement and ease of processing might be of enough importance to overshadow any potential negative impact. We conducted two experiments in which curriculum-relevant material was presented in natural classroom environments, first with college undergraduates and then with middle-school students. All students in each study received the same relevant content, but the degree of contextualization in these materials was varied between students. In both studies, we found that greater contextualization was associated with poorer transfer performance. We interpret these results as reflecting a greater degree of embeddedness for the knowledge acquired from richer, more concrete materials, such that the underlying principles are represented in a less abstract and generalizable form.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel B Day
- Department of Psychology, Susquehanna University , Selinsgrove, PA, USA
| | - Benjamin A Motz
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington , Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Robert L Goldstone
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington , Bloomington, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
|
39
|
Goldstone RL, Pestilli F, Börner K. Self-portraits of the brain: cognitive science, data visualization, and communicating brain structure and function. Trends Cogn Sci 2015; 19:462-74. [PMID: 26187032 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2015] [Revised: 05/20/2015] [Accepted: 05/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L Goldstone
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA; Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
| | - Franco Pestilli
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA; Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA; Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA; Indiana University Network Science Institute, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Katy Börner
- Department of Information and Library Science, School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA; Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA; Indiana University Network Science Institute, Bloomington, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Granovskiy B, Gold JM, Sumpter DJT, Goldstone RL. Integration of Social Information by Human Groups. Top Cogn Sci 2015; 7:469-93. [PMID: 26189568 DOI: 10.1111/tops.12150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2012] [Revised: 07/22/2014] [Accepted: 10/28/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
We consider a situation in which individuals search for accurate decisions without direct feedback on their accuracy, but with information about the decisions made by peers in their group. The "wisdom of crowds" hypothesis states that the average judgment of many individuals can give a good estimate of, for example, the outcomes of sporting events and the answers to trivia questions. Two conditions for the application of wisdom of crowds are that estimates should be independent and unbiased. Here, we study how individuals integrate social information when answering trivia questions with answers that range between 0% and 100% (e.g., "What percentage of Americans are left-handed?"). We find that, consistent with the wisdom of crowds hypothesis, average performance improves with group size. However, individuals show a consistent bias to produce estimates that are insufficiently extreme. We find that social information provides significant, albeit small, improvement to group performance. Outliers with answers far from the correct answer move toward the position of the group mean. Given that these outliers also tend to be nearer to 50% than do the answers of other group members, this move creates group polarization away from 50%. By looking at individual performance over different questions we find that some people are more likely to be affected by social influence than others. There is also evidence that people differ in their competence in answering questions, but lack of competence is not significantly correlated with willingness to change guesses. We develop a mathematical model based on these results that postulates a cognitive process in which people first decide whether to take into account peer guesses, and if so, to move in the direction of these guesses. The size of the move is proportional to the distance between their own guess and the average guess of the group. This model closely approximates the distribution of guess movements and shows how outlying incorrect opinions can be systematically removed from a group resulting, in some situations, in improved group performance. However, improvement is only predicted for cases in which the initial guesses of individuals in the group are biased.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boris Granovskiy
- Department of Mathematics, Uppsala University, Institute for Futures Studies, Stockholm
| | - Jason M Gold
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University
| | - David J T Sumpter
- Department of Mathematics, Uppsala University, Institute for Futures Studies, Stockholm
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
The resurgence of interest in collective behavior is in large part due to tools recently made available for conducting laboratory experiments on groups, statistical methods for analyzing large data sets reflecting social interactions, the rapid growth of a diverse variety of online self-organized collectives, and computational modeling methods for understanding both universal and scenario-specific social patterns. We consider case studies of collective behavior along four attributes: the primary motivation of individuals within the group, kinds of interactions among individuals, typical dynamics that result from these interactions, and characteristic outcomes at the group level. With this framework, we compare the collective patterns of noninteracting decision makers, bee swarms, groups forming paths in physical and abstract spaces, sports teams, cooperation and competition for resource usage, and the spread and extension of innovations in an online community. Some critical issues surrounding collective behavior are then reviewed, including the questions of "Does group behavior always reduce to individual behavior?""Is 'group cognition' possible?" and "What is the value of formal modeling for understanding group behavior?"
Collapse
|
42
|
Carvalho PF, Goldstone RL. What you learn is more than what you see: what can sequencing effects tell us about inductive category learning? Front Psychol 2015; 6:505. [PMID: 25983699 PMCID: PMC4415402 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2015] [Accepted: 04/09/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Inductive category learning takes place across time. As such, it is not surprising that the sequence in which information is studied has an impact in what is learned and how efficient learning is. In this paper we review research on different learning sequences and how this impacts learning. We analyze different aspects of interleaved (frequent alternation between categories during study) and blocked study (infrequent alternation between categories during study) that might explain how and when one sequence of study results in improved learning. While these different sequences of study differ in the amount of temporal spacing and temporal juxtaposition between items of different categories, these aspects do not seem to account for the majority of the results available in the literature. However, differences in the type of category being studied and the duration of the retention interval between study and test may play an important role. We conclude that there is no single aspect that is able to account for all the evidence available. Understanding learning as a process of sequential comparisons in time and how different sequences fundamentally alter the statistics of this experience offers a promising framework for understanding sequencing effects in category learning. We use this framework to present novel predictions and hypotheses for future research on sequencing effects in inductive category learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulo F. Carvalho
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana UniversityBloomington, IN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Brunel L, Carvalho PF, Goldstone RL. It does belong together: cross-modal correspondences influence cross-modal integration during perceptual learning. Front Psychol 2015; 6:358. [PMID: 25914653 PMCID: PMC4390988 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2014] [Accepted: 03/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Experiencing a stimulus in one sensory modality is often associated with an experience in another sensory modality. For instance, seeing a lemon might produce a sensation of sourness. This might indicate some kind of cross-modal correspondence between vision and gustation. The aim of the current study was to explore whether such cross-modal correspondences influence cross-modal integration during perceptual learning. To that end, we conducted two experiments. Using a speeded classification task, Experiment 1 established a cross-modal correspondence between visual lightness and the frequency of an auditory tone. Using a short-term priming procedure, Experiment 2 showed that manipulation of such cross-modal correspondences led to the creation of a crossmodal unit regardless of the nature of the correspondence (i.e., congruent, Experiment 2a or incongruent, Experiment 2b). However, a comparison of priming effects sizes suggested that cross-modal correspondences modulate cross-modal integration during learning, leading to new learned units that have different stability over time. We discuss the implications of our results for the relation between cross-modal correspondence and perceptual learning in the context of a Bayesian explanation of cross-modal correspondences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lionel Brunel
- Laboratoire Epsylon, Department of Psychology, Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier III Montpellier, France
| | - Paulo F Carvalho
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington IN, USA
| | - Robert L Goldstone
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Tullis JG, Goldstone RL, Hanson AJ. Scheduling Scaffolding: The Extent and Arrangement of Assistance During Training Impacts Test Performance. J Mot Behav 2015; 47:442-52. [DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2015.1008686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
45
|
Goldstone RL, de Leeuw JR, Landy DH. Fitting perception in and to cognition. Cognition 2015; 135:24-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2014] [Revised: 11/15/2014] [Accepted: 11/17/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
46
|
Carvalho PF, Goldstone RL. Effects of interleaved and blocked study on delayed test of category learning generalization. Front Psychol 2014; 5:936. [PMID: 25202296 PMCID: PMC4141442 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2014] [Accepted: 08/06/2014] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Studying different concepts by frequently alternating between them (i.e., interleaving), improves discriminative contrast between different categories, while studying each concept in separate blocks emphasizes the similarities within each category. Interleaved study has been shown to improve learning of high similarity categories by increasing between-category comparison, while blocked study improves learning of low similarity categories by increasing within-category comparison. In addition, interleaved study presents greater temporal spacing between repetitions of each category compared to blocked study, which might present long-term memory benefits. In this study we asked if the benefits of temporal spacing would interact with the benefits of sequencing for making comparisons when testing was delayed, particularly for low similarity categories. Blocked study might be predicted to promote noticing similarities across members of the same category and result in short-term benefits. However, the increase in temporal delay between repetitions inherent to interleaved study might benefit both types of categories when tested after a longer retention interval. Participants studied categories either interleaved or blocked and were tested immediately and 24 h after study. We found an interaction between schedule of study and the type of category studied, which is consistent with the differential emphasis promoted by each sequential schedule. However, increasing the retention interval did not modulate this interaction or resulted in improved performance for interleaved study. Overall, this indicates that the benefit of interleaving is not primarily due to temporal spacing during study, but rather due to the cross-category comparisons that interleaving facilitates. We discuss the benefits of temporal spacing of repetitions in the context of sequential study and how it can be integrated with the attentional bias hypothesis proposed by Carvalho and Goldstone (2014a).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulo F Carvalho
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Robert L Goldstone
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Needham A, Goldstone RL, Wiesen SE. Learning visual units after brief experience in 10-month-old infants. Cogn Sci 2014; 38:1507-19. [PMID: 24673116 DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2013] [Revised: 08/07/2013] [Accepted: 08/26/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
How does perceptual learning take place early in life? Traditionally, researchers have focused on how infants make use of information within displays to organize it, but recently, increasing attention has been paid to the question of how infants perceive objects differently depending upon their recent interactions with the objects. This experiment investigates 10-month-old infants' use of brief prior experiences with objects to visually organize a display consisting of multiple geometrically shaped three-dimensional blocks created for this study. After a brief exposure to a multipart portion of the display, each infant was shown two test events, one of which preserved the unit the infant had seen and the other of which broke that unit. Overall, infants looked longer at the event that broke the unit they had seen prior to testing than the event that preserved that unit, suggesting that infants made use of the brief prior experience to (a) form a cohesive unit of the multipart portion of the display they saw prior to test and (b) segregate this unit from the rest of the test display. This suggests that infants made inferences about novel parts of the test display based on limited exposure to a subset of the test display. Like adults, infants learn features of the three-dimensional world through their experiences in it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Needham
- Department of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
Graphs and tables differentially support performance on specific tasks. For tasks requiring reading off single data points, tables are as good as or better than graphs, while for tasks involving relationships among data points, graphs often yield better performance. However, the degree to which graphs and tables support flexibility across a range of tasks is not well-understood. In two experiments, participants detected main and interaction effects in line graphs and tables of bivariate data. Graphs led to more efficient performance, but also lower flexibility, as indicated by a larger discrepancy in performance across tasks. In particular, detection of main effects of variables represented in the graph legend was facilitated relative to detection of main effects of variables represented in the x-axis. Graphs may be a preferable representational format when the desired task or analytical perspective is known in advance, but may also induce greater interpretive bias than tables, necessitating greater care in their use and design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David W Braithwaite
- Percepts-Concepts Laboratory, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Robert L Goldstone
- Percepts-Concepts Laboratory, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
The goal of the present study was to find evidence for a multisensory generalization effect (i.e., generalization from one sensory modality to another sensory modality). The authors used an innovative paradigm (adapted from Brunel, Labeye, Lesourd, & Versace, 2009 ) involving three phases: a learning phase, consisting in the categorization of geometrical shapes, which manipulated the rules of association between shapes and a sound feature, and two test phases. The first of these was designed to examine the priming effect of the geometrical shapes seen in the learning phase on target tones (i.e., priming task), while the aim of the second was to examine the probability of recognizing the previously learned geometrical shapes (i.e., recognition task). When a shape category was mostly presented with a sound during learning, all of the primes (including those not presented with a sound in the learning phase) enhanced target processing compared to a condition in which the primes were mostly seen without a sound during learning. A pattern of results consistent with this initial finding was also observed during recognition, with the participants being unable to pick out the shape seen without a sound during the learning phase. Experiment 1 revealed a multisensory generalization effect across the members of a category when the objects belonging to the same category share the same value on the shape dimension. However, a distinctiveness effect was observed when a salient feature distinguished the objects within the category (Experiment 2a vs. 2b).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lionel Brunel
- Laboratoire Epsylon, Université Paul-Valery, Montpellier 3, France
| | - Robert L. Goldstone
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Guillaume Vallet
- Laboratoire d’Etude des Mécanismes Cognitifs (EMC), Université Lumière Lyon 2, France
| | - Benoit Riou
- Laboratoire d’Etude des Mécanismes Cognitifs (EMC), Université Lumière Lyon 2, France
| | - Rémy Versace
- Laboratoire d’Etude des Mécanismes Cognitifs (EMC), Université Lumière Lyon 2, France
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Leydesdorff L, Goldstone RL. Interdisciplinarity at the journal and specialty level: The changing knowledge bases of the journalcognitive science. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 2013. [DOI: 10.1002/asi.22953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Loet Leydesdorff
- University of Amsterdam; Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR); Kloveniersburgwal 48 1012 CX Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Robert L. Goldstone
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences; Psychology Building, 1101 East 10th Street; Indiana University; Bloomington IN 47405-7007 USA
| |
Collapse
|