1
|
Hallowell R, Saluja S, Lewis L, Novak DA, Valentine W, Batch E, Clayton Johnson MA, Bluthenthal RN, Cousineau MR, Ben-Ari R. Advocacy for Health Justice: An Innovative Pilot Course for MD and Master of Public Policy Students. Teach Learn Med 2024; 36:198-210. [PMID: 36519450 DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2155169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Problem: U.S. medical schools are searching for ways to address issues of health justice in undergraduate medical education. Physicians have not typically received training in how to be effective advocates for systemic change and individuals in policy fields are not usually equipped to understand the complex issues of health science and their intersection with the health system and society. To address this gap, medical school faculty partnered with school of public policy faculty on a collaborative learning model that engaged MD and Master of Public Policy students together to strengthen their collective knowledge of the healthcare landscape, and to build skills to work for health justice. Intervention: We hypothesized that pairing medical students with public policy students to learn about the intersections of health justice and advocacy could enhance the efficacy of each group and provide a new model of collaboration between medical and policy professionals. The students collaborated on a health justice advocacy project through which they provided consultation to an established community organization. Context: The 8-week course took place in the spring of 2021 in Los Angeles, California. Due to Covid-19 the course was taught online and included asynchronous learning modules and live Zoom sessions. The project also served as a pilot for the post-clerkship phase of a new longitudinal health justice curriculum for MD students that launched in August 2021. Impact: Analysis of student work products, course evaluations, partner interviews, and student focus groups showed that students valued learning through their interdisciplinary collaborative work which gave them new perspectives on health justice issues. The community partners indicated that the students consultative work products were useful for their initiatives, and that they found working with MD and MPP students to be a valuable way to think about how to build stronger and more inclusive coalitions to advocate for health justice. This project has the potential for national impact as it aligns with the Association of American Medical Colleges' renewed focus on the responsibility of academic medicine to partner with communities for health justice. The project also contributed to the national conversation on how to align health systems science education with the aims of health justice through our participation in the American Medical Association Accelerating Change in Medical Education Consortium. Lessons Learned: Leveraging faculty relationships with community partners was crucial for developing meaningful projects for students. Cultivating and expanding community partner networks is necessary to sustain and scale up this type of intervention. Centering the needs of communities and supporting their on-going work for health justice is essential for becoming an effective advocate. Learning communities that bring interdisciplinary students, healthcare providers, policy professionals, and community partners together to learn from one another can create key opportunities for ameliorating health inequities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronan Hallowell
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Sonali Saluja
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - LaVonna Lewis
- Sol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Daniel A Novak
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Eric Batch
- American Heart Association, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Ricky N Bluthenthal
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Michael R Cousineau
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ron Ben-Ari
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wells AU, Flaherty KR, Brown KK, Inoue Y, Devaraj A, Richeldi L, Moua T, Crestani B, Wuyts WA, Stowasser S, Quaresma M, Goeldner RG, Schlenker-Herceg R, Kolb M, Aburto M, Acosta O, Andrews C, Antin-Ozerkis D, Arce G, Arias M, Avdeev S, Barczyk A, Bascom R, Bazdyrev E, Beirne P, Belloli E, Bergna M, Bergot E, Bhatt N, Blaas S, Bondue B, Bonella F, Britt E, Buch K, Burk J, Cai H, Cantin A, Castillo Villegas D, Cazaux A, Cerri S, Chaaban S, Chaudhuri N, Cottin V, Crestani B, Criner G, Dahlqvist C, Danoff S, Dematte D'Amico J, Dilling D, Elias P, Ettinger N, Falk J, Fernández Pérez E, Gamez-Dubuis A, Giessel G, Gifford A, Glassberg M, Glazer C, Golden J, Gómez Carrera L, Guiot J, Hallowell R, Hayashi H, Hetzel J, Hirani N, Homik L, Hope-Gill B, Hotchkin D, Ichikado K, Ilkovich M, Inoue Y, Izumi S, Jassem E, Jones L, Jouneau S, Kaner R, Kang J, Kawamura T, Kessler R, Kim Y, Kishi K, Kitamura H, Kolb M, Kondoh Y, Kono C, Koschel D, Kreuter M, Kulkarni T, Kus J, Lebargy F, León Jiménez A, Luo Q, Mageto Y, Maher T, Makino S, Marchand-Adam S, Marquette C, Martinez R, Martínez M, Maturana Rozas R, Miyazaki Y, Moiseev S, Molina-Molina M, Morrison L, Morrow L, Moua T, Nambiar A, Nishioka Y, Nunes H, Okamoto M, Oldham J, Otaola M, Padilla M, Park J, Patel N, Pesci A, Piotrowski W, Pitts L, Poonyagariyagorn H, Prasse A, Quadrelli S, Randerath W, Refini R, Reynaud-Gaubert M, Riviere F, Rodríguez Portal J, Rosas I, Rossman M, Safdar Z, Saito T, Sakamoto N, Salinas Fénero M, Sauleda J, Schmidt S, Scholand M, Schwartz M, Shapera S, Shlobin O, Sigal B, Silva Orellana A, Skowasch D, Song J, Stieglitz S, Stone H, Strek M, Suda T, Sugiura H, Takahashi H, Takaya H, Takeuchi T, Thavarajah K, Tolle L, Tomassetti S, Tomii K, Valenzuela C, Vancheri C, Varone F, Veeraraghavan S, Villar A, Weigt S, Wemeau L, Wuyts W, Xu Z, Yakusevich V, Yamada Y, Yamauchi H, Ziora D. Nintedanib in patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases-subgroup analyses by interstitial lung disease diagnosis in the INBUILD trial: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. Lancet Respir Med 2020; 8:453-460. [PMID: 32145830 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30036-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 263] [Impact Index Per Article: 65.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Revised: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The INBUILD trial investigated the efficacy and safety of nintedanib versus placebo in patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We aimed to establish the effects of nintedanib in subgroups based on ILD diagnosis. METHODS The INBUILD trial was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial done at 153 sites in 15 countries. Participants had an investigator-diagnosed fibrosing ILD other than IPF, with chest imaging features of fibrosis of more than 10% extent on high resolution CT (HRCT), forced vital capacity (FVC) of 45% or more predicted, and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLco) of at least 30% and less than 80% predicted. Participants fulfilled protocol-defined criteria for ILD progression in the 24 months before screening, despite management considered appropriate in clinical practice for the individual ILD. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 by means of a pseudo-random number generator to receive nintedanib 150 mg twice daily or placebo for at least 52 weeks. Participants, investigators, and other personnel involved in the trial and analysis were masked to treatment assignment until after database lock. In this subgroup analysis, we assessed the rate of decline in FVC (mL/year) over 52 weeks in patients who received at least one dose of nintedanib or placebo in five prespecified subgroups based on the ILD diagnoses documented by the investigators: hypersensitivity pneumonitis, autoimmune ILDs, idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia, unclassifiable idiopathic interstitial pneumonia, and other ILDs. The trial has been completed and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02999178. FINDINGS Participants were recruited between Feb 23, 2017, and April 27, 2018. Of 663 participants who received at least one dose of nintedanib or placebo, 173 (26%) had chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, 170 (26%) an autoimmune ILD, 125 (19%) idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia, 114 (17%) unclassifiable idiopathic interstitial pneumonia, and 81 (12%) other ILDs. The effect of nintedanib versus placebo on reducing the rate of FVC decline (mL/year) was consistent across the five subgroups by ILD diagnosis in the overall population (hypersensitivity pneumonitis 73·1 [95% CI -8·6 to 154·8]; autoimmune ILDs 104·0 [21·1 to 186·9]; idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia 141·6 [46·0 to 237·2]; unclassifiable idiopathic interstitial pneumonia 68·3 [-31·4 to 168·1]; and other ILDs 197·1 [77·6 to 316·7]; p=0·41 for treatment by subgroup by time interaction). Adverse events reported in the subgroups were consistent with those reported in the overall population. INTERPRETATION The INBUILD trial was not designed or powered to provide evidence for a benefit of nintedanib in specific diagnostic subgroups. However, its results suggest that nintedanib reduces the rate of ILD progression, as measured by FVC decline, in patients who have a chronic fibrosing ILD and progressive phenotype, irrespective of the underlying ILD diagnosis. FUNDING Boehringer Ingelheim.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athol U Wells
- National Institute for Health Research Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kevin R Flaherty
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Kevin K Brown
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Yoshikazu Inoue
- Clinical Research Center, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Sakai City, Osaka, Japan
| | - Anand Devaraj
- Department of Radiology, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Luca Richeldi
- Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Teng Moua
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Bruno Crestani
- Université de Paris, Inserm U1152, APHP, Hôpital Bichat, Centre de reference constitutif pour les maladies pulmonaires rares, Paris, France
| | - Wim A Wuyts
- Unit for Interstitial Lung Diseases, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Manuel Quaresma
- Boehringer Ingelheim International, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany
| | | | | | - Martin Kolb
- McMaster University and St Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Novak DA, Hallowell R, Ben-Ari R, Elliott D. A Continuum of Innovation: Curricular Renewal Strategies in Undergraduate Medical Education, 2010-2018. Acad Med 2019; 94:S79-S85. [PMID: 31365397 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000002909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Since 2010, medical schools across the United States have engaged in a new cycle of curricular revision and renewal for their undergraduate medical curricula. But what structures, features, and trends have emerged in U.S. medical schools as a result of deliberate curricular redesign efforts? An analysis of the ways that medical schools have approached the reorganization of their curricula to prepare their students for the growing complexity of medical practice is presented. METHOD This study drew a total pool of 40 U.S. MD-granting programs, of which 25 met the inclusion criteria for the study. The authors used a qualitative coding approach to materials from the undergraduate medical education (UME) program websites to identify 4 dimensions of strategies that these programs used to renew their curricula. RESULTS The analysis of the curricular maps and website content of the UME programs provided evidence for a continuum approach to the description of innovation strategies: 96% of schools employed a cohort-based linear pathway, 80% of schools used thematic basic science blocks, 47% placed their Step 1 exams outside of the second year, and 68% moved their clerkships to the second year. CONCLUSIONS The Continuum of Innovation strategies will enable programs to renew their curricula in ways that promote deliberate curricular changes that are consistent with emerging needs in the field. This study and future research may be useful for UME programs with limited resources by providing consensus practices that enable them to plan curricular changes in ways that best serve their institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel A Novak
- D.A. Novak is assistant professor of clinical medical education, Department of Medical Education, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California. R. Hallowell is assistant professor of clinical medical education, Department of Medical Education, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California. R. Ben-Ari is associate professor of clinical medicine, associate dean for continuing medical education, and associate dean for curriculum, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California. D. Elliott is professor of clinical pediatrics and medical education, vice dean for medical education, and chair, Department of Medical Education, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|