Supportive care needs of breast cancer survivors with different levels of fear of cancer recurrence: A cross-sectional survey study

PURPOSE

To examine the supportive care needs of breast cancer survivors with nonclinical, subclinical, or clinical fear of cancer recurrence.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 385 breast cancer survivors consented and completed a set of online questionnaires. Supportive care needs were assessed by using the 34-item Supportive Care Needs Survey. Fear of cancer recurrence was assessed by using the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-four (47.8%) participants reported nonclinical fear of cancer recurrence, 147 (38.2%) reported subclinical fear of cancer recurrence, and 54 (14.0%) reported clinical fear of cancer recurrence. Higher levels of fear of cancer recurrence were associated with higher levels of supportive care needs in five domains (β = 0.30-0.60, P < 0.001) after adjusting for places of residence, education, motherhood, and time since diagnosis. Among participants with nonclinical fears of cancer recurrence, the most common needs were in the 'Health care system/Information' domain (50.5%). Among participants with subclinical or clinical fear of cancer recurrence, the most common needs were in the 'Psychological' domain (85.7% and 96.3%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Fear of cancer recurrence was associated with supportive care needs. The most common needs among participants with subclinical or clinical fears of cancer recurrence were psychological needs.

The effect of psychological interventions on fear of cancer recurrence in breast cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of psychological interventions in reducing fear of cancer recurrence in breast cancer survivors.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant studies published from 1 January 1976 to 28 November 2020.

METHODS

Eligible randomized controlled trials on psychological interventions for reducing fear of cancer recurrence in breast cancer survivors were included in meta-analysis. Review Manager 5.4 was used to conduct the meta-analysis, and the fear of cancer recurrence score was calculated by using standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Quality of evidence, sensitivity analyses, and subgroup analyses were also conducted.

RESULTS

This systematic review included 16 randomized controlled trials. We found psychological interventions significantly reduced fear of cancer recurrence. Subgroup analyses indicated that mindfulness and acceptance therapy-based interventions reduced fear of cancer recurrence, whereas cognitive-behavioural therapy combined with psychoeducation did not. Interventions with three to eight sessions were effective, while interventions with nine or more sessions were not. Face-to-face interventions were effective, whereas online interventions were not. The quality of evidence for fear of cancer recurrence was evaluated as moderate due to moderate heterogeneity in the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychological interventions were effective in reducing fear of cancer recurrence in breast cancer survivors. Mindfulness and acceptance therapy-based interventions and short-term interventions are recommended. Future well-designed randomized controlled trials aiming to examine the effectiveness of psychological interventions in reducing fear of cancer recurrence are needed.

IMPACT

The findings of this systematic review may guide the development of psychological interventions and encourage the use of psychological interventions for reducing fear of cancer recurrence in breast cancer survivors.

Protocol for a scoping review of digital health for older adults with cancer and their families

INTRODUCTION

The potential for digital medicine and healthcare in geriatric oncology settings has received much attention. This scoping review will summarise the nature and extent of the existing literature that describes and examines digital health development, implementation, evaluation, outcome and experience for older adults with cancer, their families and their healthcare providers.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Arksey and O'Malley's six stages of scoping review methodology framework will be used. Searches will be conducted in Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Embase via OvidSP, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) Plus via EBSCO, Scopus and PsycINFO via OvidSP for published articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals from year 2000 onwards. In addition, we will screen databases for all prospectively registered trials. Research articles using quantitative or qualitative study design or reviews will be included if they describe or report the design, development or usability of digital health interventions in the treatment and care of patients 65 years of age or older with cancer and their families before, during and after cancer treatment. Grey literature will not be searched and included. Two investigators will independently perform the literature search, eligibility assessments and study selection. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram for the scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) will be used to delineate the search decision process. For included articles, the extracted results will be synthesised both quantitatively and qualitatively and reported under key conceptual categories of this scoping review. Research gaps and opportunities will be identified and summarised.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Since this review will only include published data, ethics approval will not be sought. The results of the review will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. We will also engage with relevant stakeholders within research team's networks to determine suitable approaches for dissemination.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of education on medication adherence for patients with hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and diabetes

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of educational interventions in improving medication adherence among adult patients diagnosed with hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and/or diabetes.

DESIGN

This review was conducted with reference to methods set out in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42016053402).

DATA SOURCES

A search from seven electronic databases (2003-2016).

REVIEW METHOD

The quality of evidence and strength of the studies was evaluated systematically, followed by an assessment of risks of bias by two reviewers with the Cochrane Collaboration's tool.

RESULTS

Eighteen randomized controlled trials demonstrated a low to moderate quality evidence on the improvements of medication adherence with educational interventions. Participants with type 2 diabetes benefited from education interventions but not those with hypertension. No randomized controlled trials (RCT) was found for participants with hyperlipidaemia. Education that was conducted at home showed better medication adherence than education conducted in clinics. Medication adherence was improved after two to three sessions but no significant differences found after three sessions.

CONCLUSION

Through education, health literacy is improved, thus improving medication adherence.

IMPACT

A plethora of educational interventions have been implemented in the clinical settings, but no reviews have hitherto been conducted on their effectiveness. This review suggested that education improves health literacy which is directly proportionate to optimal disease management including medication adherence. The suggestions proposed in this review may impact the individual in terms of their adherence to medication to tackle exacerbation and relapse of chronic diseases and also proposed suggestions for future implementation of an education intervention.