1
|
Song H, Edwards C, Curto R, Perez A, Cruess C, Schell A, Park J. Does Epidural Corticosteroid Application During Spinal Surgery Reduce Postoperative Pain?: An Adjunct to Multimodal Analgesia. Clin Spine Surg 2024:01933606-990000000-00273. [PMID: 38446588 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study. OBJECTIVE To examine the effect of intraoperative epidural administration of Depo-Medrol on postoperative back pain and radiculitis symptoms in patients undergoing Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Postoperative pain is commonly experienced by patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery. Adequate management of intense pain is necessary to encourage early ambulation, increase patient satisfaction, and limit opioid consumption. Intraoperative steroid application has been shown to improve postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar decompression surgeries. There have been no studies examining the effect of epidural steroids on both back pain and radicular pain in patients undergoing TLIF. METHOD In all, 151 patients underwent TLIF surgery using rh-BMP2 with 3 surgeons at a single institution. Of those, 116 remained in the study and were included in the final analysis. Based on a 1:1 randomization, a collagen sponge saturated with either Saline (1 cc) or Depo-Medrol (40 mg/1 cc) was placed at the annulotomy site on the TLIF level. Follow-up occurred on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 7, and postoperative months 1, 2, and 3. Lumbar radiculopathy was measured by a modified symptom- and laterality-specific Visual Analog Scale (VAS) regarding the severity of back pain and common radiculopathy symptoms. RESULTS The patients who received Depo-Medrol, compared with those who received saline, experienced significantly less back pain on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7 (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in back pain beyond day 7. Radiculopathy-related symptoms such as leg pain, numbness, tingling, stiffness, and weakness tended to be reduced in the steroid group at most time points. CONCLUSION This study provides Level 1 evidence that intraoperative application of Depo-Medrol during a TLIF surgery with rh-BMP2 significantly reduces back pain for the first week after TLIF surgery. The use of epidural Depo-Medrol may be a useful adjunct to multimodal analgesia for pain relief in the postoperative period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Song
- The Maryland Spine Center, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Platt AP, Bradley BT, Nasir N, Stein SR, Ramelli SC, Ramos-Benitez MJ, Dickey JM, Purcell M, Singireddy S, Hays N, Wu J, Raja K, Curto R, Salipante SJ, Chisholm C, Carnes S, Marshall DA, Cookson BT, Vannella KM, Madathil RJ, Soherwardi S, McCurdy MT, Saharia KK, Rabin J, Nih Covid-Autopsy Consortium, Grazioli A, Kleiner DE, Hewitt SM, Lieberman JA, Chertow DS. Pulmonary Co-Infections Detected Premortem Underestimate Postmortem Findings in a COVID-19 Autopsy Case Series. Pathogens 2023; 12:932. [PMID: 37513779 PMCID: PMC10383307 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12070932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Bacterial and fungal co-infections are reported complications of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in critically ill patients but may go unrecognized premortem due to diagnostic limitations. We compared the premortem with the postmortem detection of pulmonary co-infections in 55 fatal COVID-19 cases from March 2020 to March 2021. The concordance in the premortem versus the postmortem diagnoses and the pathogen identification were evaluated. Premortem pulmonary co-infections were extracted from medical charts while applying standard diagnostic definitions. Postmortem co-infection was defined by compatible lung histopathology with or without the detection of an organism in tissue by bacterial or fungal staining, or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with broad-range bacterial and fungal primers. Pulmonary co-infection was detected premortem in significantly fewer cases (15/55, 27%) than were detected postmortem (36/55, 65%; p < 0.0001). Among cases in which co-infection was detected postmortem by histopathology, an organism was identified in 27/36 (75%) of cases. Pseudomonas, Enterobacterales, and Staphylococcus aureus were the most frequently identified bacteria both premortem and postmortem. Invasive pulmonary fungal infection was detected in five cases postmortem, but in no cases premortem. According to the univariate analyses, the patients with undiagnosed pulmonary co-infection had significantly shorter hospital (p = 0.0012) and intensive care unit (p = 0.0006) stays and significantly fewer extra-pulmonary infections (p = 0.0021). Bacterial and fungal pulmonary co-infection are under-recognized complications in critically ill patients with COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew P Platt
- Emerging Pathogens Section, Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
- Laboratory of Virology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Benjamin T Bradley
- Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Nadia Nasir
- Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Sydney R Stein
- Emerging Pathogens Section, Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
- Laboratory of Virology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Sabrina C Ramelli
- Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Marcos J Ramos-Benitez
- Emerging Pathogens Section, Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
- Laboratory of Virology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
- Department of Basic Sciences, Division of Microbiology, Ponce Research Institute, School of Medicine, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce, PR 00716, USA
| | - James M Dickey
- Emerging Pathogens Section, Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
- Laboratory of Virology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | | | | | - Nicole Hays
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Jocelyn Wu
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Katherine Raja
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Ryan Curto
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Stephen J Salipante
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Claire Chisholm
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | | | - Desiree A Marshall
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Brad T Cookson
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Kevin M Vannella
- Emerging Pathogens Section, Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
- Laboratory of Virology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Ronson J Madathil
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | | | - Michael T McCurdy
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland St. Joseph Medical Center, Towson, MD 21204, USA
| | - Kapil K Saharia
- Institute of Human Virology, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Joseph Rabin
- R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Department of Surgery and Program in Trauma, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | | | - Alison Grazioli
- R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Department of Medicine and Program in Trauma, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - David E Kleiner
- Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Stephen M Hewitt
- Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Joshua A Lieberman
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Daniel S Chertow
- Emerging Pathogens Section, Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
- Laboratory of Virology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Platt A, Lach I, Strich JR, Wigerblad G, Curto R, Singireddy S, Wu J, Raja K, Raja K, Saharia KK, Kaplan MJ, Chertow DS. 1044. Identification and Characterization of an Unconventional NK Subset in COVID-19. Open Forum Infect Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac492.885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus is associated with dysregulation in the innate immune response including NK cells. NK cells are integral in the innate immune response against viral infections. Canonical NK cells are classified as CD56dim CD16+ and CD56bright CD16-. An unconventional subset of CD56dim CD16- NK cells has previously been identified in COVID-19 that is not present in other viral infections. Here we characterize phenotypic changes in the NK cells of patients with severe COVID-19 as work towards determining the functional status of this unconventional subset.
Methods
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and plasma were isolated from healthy donors (n=5) and patients with severe COVID-19 on Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) (n=15). Primary NK cells were stimulated in vitro with plasma from patients with severe COVID-19 or healthy donors. Flow cytometry was used to phenotype the NK cells. A separate cohort of PBMC samples (n=7) from patients requiring hospitalization for COVID-19 underwent Cellular Indexing of Transcriptomes and Epitopes by Sequencing (CITE-Seq) analysis.
Results
The CD56bright CD16- NK subset was expanded in PBMCs from patients with severe COVID-19 as compared to healthy controls. CITE-Seq demonstrated that NK cells without surface CD16 clustered separately based on transcriptional profiling and did express FCGR3A at the translational level. Stimulation with COVID-19 plasma recapitulated the loss of CD16 from primary human NK cells and led to increased activity of Caspase 3/7. Figure 1.NK cells shift from the CD56dim CD16+ subset to the CD56dim CD16-subset in patients with severe COVID-19.
a) Representative gating of NK cell subsets by Flow Cytometry in healthy and COVID-19 patient peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). b) Percentage of total NK cells belonging to a particular cell subset compared between healthy donor samples (n=4) and COVID-19 patient samples (n=8). Data points represent an individual patient sample. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean. Differences between groups was analyzed using a two tailed t-test. *: p< 0.05, ns: not significant Figure 2.NK cells shift from the CD56dim CD16+ subset to the CD56dim CD16-subset after stimulation with COVID-19 plasma in vitro
a) Representative gating of NK cell subsets by Flow Cytometry analysis in healthy donor NK cells stimulated by healthy plasma and COVID-19 patient plasma. b)Relative change in percentage of total NK cells belonging to a particular cell subset compared between healthy donor plasma (n=6)and COVID-19 patient plasma (n=15) stimulation conditions. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean and the difference between groups was analyzed using a two-tailed T-test. **: p< 0.01, ***: p< 0.001, ns: not significant.
Conclusion
We demonstrate and characterize a nonclassical population of CD56dim CD16- NK cells that are present in patients with severe COVID-19 and replicate this phenotype in vitro. Reproduction of this in vivo phenotype in an in vitro system will allow for additional studies on the functional state of NK cell subsets in COVID-19. The presence of this NK cell population may reflect a dysregulated innate immune response and immunopathogenesis of COVID-19.
Disclosures
All Authors: No reported disclosures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Platt
- National Institutes of Health, Clinical Center , Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Izabella Lach
- National Institutes of Health, Clinical Center , Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jeffrey R Strich
- Critical Care Medicine, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center , Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Gustaf Wigerblad
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Disease, Systemic Autoimmunity Branch , Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Ryan Curto
- University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Jocelyn Wu
- University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Katherine Raja
- University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Katherine Raja
- University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Kapil K Saharia
- Institute of Human Virology and Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Mariana J Kaplan
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Disease, Systemic Autoimmunity Branch , Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Daniel S Chertow
- National Institutes of Health, Critical Care Medicine Department , Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Experimental and clinical data on purine metabolism are collated and analyzed with three mathematical models. The first model is the result of an attempt to construct a traditional kinetic model based on Michaelis-Menten rate laws. This attempt is only partially successful, since kinetic information, while extensive, is not complete, and since qualitative information is difficult to incorporate into this type of model. The data gaps necessitate the complementation of the Michaelis-Menten model with other functional forms that can incorporate different types of data. The most convenient and established representations for this purpose are rate laws formulated as power-law functions, and these are used to construct a Complemented Michaelis-Menten (CMM) model. The other two models are pure power-law-representations, one in the form of a Generalized Mass Action (GMA) system, and the other one in the form of an S-system. The first part of the paper contains a compendium of experimental data necessary for any model of purine metabolism. This is followed by the formulation of the three models and a comparative analysis. For physiological and moderately pathological perturbations in metabolites or enzymes, the results of the three models are very similar and consistent with clinical findings. This is an encouraging result since the three models have different structures and data requirements and are based on different mathematical assumptions. Significant enzyme deficiencies are not so well modeled by the S-system model. The CMM model captures the dynamics better, but judging by comparisons with clinical observations, the best model in this case is the GMA model. The model results are discussed in some detail, along with advantages and disadvantages of each modeling strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Curto
- Departament de Bioquímica i Biología Molecular, Facultat de Químiques, Universitat de Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|