Effect of once-daily tadalafil on confidence and perceived difficulty in performing sexual intercourse in men who were incomplete responders to as-needed PDE5 inhibitor treatment

INTRODUCTION

For men with erectile dysfunction (ED), the expectation of difficulty and level of confidence in achieving and maintaining an erection have an impact on sexual performance.

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

This 12-week, double-blind study investigated once-daily tadalafil (2.5 mg titrated to 5 mg or 5 mg) (n = 176) or placebo (n = 79) on confidence and perceived difficulty in performing sexual intercourse in men with ED who were incomplete responders to as-needed phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor therapy. The Confidence in Performing Sexual Intercourse Questionnaire (CPSIQ) and Difficulty in Performing Sexual Intercourse Questionnaire (DPSIQ) were administered at baseline and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

The mean change in CPSIQ for the tadalafil group was 1.8, which represents a shift from 'very low' to 'moderate' sexual confidence vs. a mean change of 0.5 in the placebo group (p < 0.0001). The mean change in DPSIQ for tadalafil was 1.6, which represents a shift from 'very difficult' to 'moderately' or 'slightly difficult' sexual performance vs. a mean change of 0.4 in the placebo group (p < 0.0001). Among men receiving tadalafil with an International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) end-point score of ≥ 26 or who achieved a minimal clinically important difference in IIEF-EF score at end-point, the mean changes in CPSIQ were 3.0 and 2.4, respectively (both p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Once-daily tadalafil vs. placebo improves confidence and decreases difficulty in performing sexual intercourse for men with ED who were incomplete responders to as-needed PDE5 inhibitor therapy.

Further evidence of the reliability and validity of the premature ejaculation diagnostic tool

This study details the further validation of the Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT), a five-item tool, developed to systematically apply the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, revised version 4 (DSM-IV-TR), criteria in diagnosing presence or absence of premature ejaculation (PE). A total of 102 men completed the PEDT and were then interviewed by one of the seven clinical experts, who made a diagnosis of presence or absence of PE. The diagnoses from these two methods were compared to assess the convergent validity of PEDT. Retest reliability was also assessed, by men completing the PEDT a second time, approximately 2 weeks after the first administration. The level of agreement between clinical expert and PEDT diagnoses was very high (kappa-statistic=0.80 (95% CI=0.68-0.92)), and retest reliability was very good - Intraclass correlation coefficient=0.88. In summary, the PEDT is extensively validated, self-report measure that can systematically assess DSM-IV-TR criteria to provide accurate diagnoses of PE/no-PE.

How does premature ejaculation impact a man s life?

No systematic study has examined the psychological impact of premature ejaculation (PE) on the man and his partner. This study explores this vital issue by reporting on interviews of 28 men with self-diagnosed PE. From a qualitative perspective, these interviews assess whether these men had concerns about their PE and, if so, what they were. These men focused on two major themes: impact on self-confidence and future/current relationships. This suggests that PE has a similar qualitative impact on the individual as erectile dysfunction. Further investigation will need to determine how prevalent these concerns are in the PE population and also to delineate the impact on the men s partners.

The patient with erectile dysfunction: psychological issues

Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects as many as 30 million men and their partners in the United States. Although clinicians now recognize that as many as 80% of cases of ED are organic in origin, psychological issues remain important for the ED patient.

[The internist's view of hematuria (author's transl)]

The symptoms of hematuria are easily and accurately detected through careful sediment diagnosis. The path from initial indications to diagnosis often means a major expenditure of laboratory methods, of bioptic excisions, and of radiologic procedures for the examination. Above all, vascular and infected lesions of the kidneys and of the eliminative urinary tracts can cause hematuria, which in every case requires clarification.