Activity and safety of crizotinib in patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma with rearrangement of TFE3: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) phase II trial 90101 'CREATE'

Background

Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is an orphan malignancy associated with a rearrangement of transcription factor E3 (TFE3), leading to abnormal MET gene expression. We prospectively assessed the efficacy and safety of the MET tyrosine kinase inhibitor crizotinib in patients with advanced or metastatic ASPS.

Patients and methods

Eligible patients with reference pathology-confirmed ASPS received oral crizotinib 250 mg bd. By assessing the presence or absence of a TFE3 rearrangement, patients were attributed to MET+ and MET- sub-cohorts. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR) according to local investigator. Secondary end points included duration of response, disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), progression-free rate, overall survival (OS) and safety.

Results

Among 53 consenting patients, all had a centrally confirmed ASPS and 48 were treated. A total of 45 were eligible, treated and assessable. Among 40 MET+ patients, 1 achieved a confirmed partial response (PR) that lasted 215 days and 35 had stable disease (SD) as best response (ORR: 2.5%, 95% CI 0.6% to 80.6%). Further efficacy end points in MET+ cases were DCR: 90.0% (95% CI 76.3% to 97.2%), 1-year PFS rate: 37.5% (95% CI 22.9% to 52.1%) and 1-year OS rate: 97.4% (95% CI 82.8% to 99.6%). Among 4 MET- patients, 1 achieved a PR that lasted 801 days and 3 had SD (ORR: 25.0%, 95% CI 0.6% to 80.6%) for a DCR of 100% (95% CI 39.8% to 100.0%). The 1-year PFS rate in MET- cases was 50% (95% CI 5.8% to 84.5%) and the 1-year OS rate was 75% (95% CI 12.8% to 96.1%). One patient with unknown MET status due to technical failure achieved SD but stopped treatment due to progression after 17 cycles. The most common crizotinib-related adverse events were nausea [34/48 (70.8%)], vomiting [22/48 (45.8%)], blurred vision [22/48 (45.8%)], diarrhoea (20/48 (41.7%)] and fatigue [19/48 (39.6%)].

Conclusion

According to European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) efficacy criteria for soft tissue sarcoma, our study demonstrated that crizotinib has activity in TFE3 rearranged ASPS MET+ patients.

Clinical trial number

EORTC 90101, NCT01524926.

Whole brain radiotherapy after stereotactic radiosurgery or surgical resection among patients with one to three brain metastases and favorable prognoses: a secondary analysis of EORTC 22952-26001

Background

The absence of a survival benefit for whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) among randomized trials has been attributed to a competing risk of death from extracranial disease. We re-analyzed EORTC 22952 to assess the impact of WBRT on survival for patients with controlled extracranial disease or favorable prognoses.

Patients and methods

We utilized Cox regression, landmark analysis, and the Kaplan-Meier method to evaluate the impact of WBRT on survival accounting for (i) extracranial progression as a time-dependent covariate in all patients and (ii) diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (GPA) score in patients with primary non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Results

A total of 329 patients treated per-protocol were included for analysis with a median follow up of 26 months. One hundred and fifteen (35%) patients had no extracranial progression; 70 (21%) patients had progression <90 days, 65 (20%) between 90 and 180 days, and 79 (24%) patients >180 days from randomization. There was no difference in the model-based risk of death in the WBRT group before [hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI)=0.70 (0.45-1.11), P = 0.133), or after [HR (95% CI)=1.20 (0.89-1.61), P = 0.214] extracranial progression. Among 177 patients with NSCLC, 175 had data available for GPA calculation. There was no significant survival benefit to WBRT among NSCLC patients with favorable GPA scores [HR (95% CI)=1.10 (0.68-1.79)] or unfavorable GPA scores [HR (95% CI)=1.11 (0.71-1.76)].

Conclusions

Among patients with limited extracranial disease and one to three brain metastases at enrollment, we found no significant survival benefit to WBRT among NSCLC patients with favorable GPA scores or patients with any histology and controlled extracranial disease status. This exploratory analysis of phase III data supports the practice of omitting WBRT for patients with limited brain metastases undergoing SRS and close surveillance.

Clinical Trials Number

NCT00002899.

LungTech, an EORTC Phase II trial of stereotactic body radiotherapy for centrally located lung tumours: a clinical perspective

Evidence supports stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as a curative treatment option for inoperable early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) resulting in high rates of tumour control and low risk of toxicity. However, promising results are mainly derived from SBRT of peripheral pulmonary lesions, whereas SBRT for the central tumours can lead to severe radiation sequelae owing to the spatial proximity to the serial organs at risk. Robust data on the tolerance of mediastinal structures to high-dose hypofractionated radiation are limited; furthermore, there are many open questions regarding the efficiency, safety and response assessment of SBRT in inoperable, centrally located early stage NSCLC, which are addressed in a prospective multicentre study [sponsored by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC 22113-08113-LungTech)]. In this review, we summarize the current status regarding SBRT for centrally located early stage NSCLC that leads to the rationale of the LungTech trial. Outline and some essential features of the study with focus on a summary of current experiences in dose/fraction-toxicity coherences after SBRT to the mediastinal structures that lead to LungTech normal tissue constraints are provided.

Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Comparison of four staging systems in two French clinical trials

4589

Background: The aims of our study were to compare performances of 4 staging systems and to explore how to improve prognostic classification among French patients with HCC whose main aetiology is alcoholic cirrhosis. Methods: We have pooled 2 RCTs in palliative condition from Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive (FFCD): - FFCD 9403 comparing tamoxifen vs symptomatic treatment and - FFCD 9402 comparing chemoembolization + tamoxifen vs tamoxifen alone. They had respectively included 416 and 122 patients. Performance of Okuda, Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP), Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer group (BCLC) and GRoupe d’Etude et de Traitement du Carcinome Hépatocellulaire scores have been compared using: Akaike information criteria (AIC), discriminatory ability (Harrell’s c and the Royston’s D statistics), monocity of gradients and predictive accuracy (Schemper statistics Vs). To explore how to improve classifications univariate and multivariate Cox model were performed. Variables with univariate p< 0.10 have been retained for multivariate analyses. A forward selection procedure has then been implemented. Bootstraps validation was performed to test the robustness of our results. Analyses were done for each trial and for the pooled database with trial stratification. Results: Median OS was 5,3 months (IC 95%: [4,6; 6,2]), 402 patients had (75%) an alcoholic cirrhosis aetiology . As shown in Table 1 , CLIP staging had the best properties, followed by Okuda and BCLC. Performances of all staging systems were rather disappointing. WHO staging for CLIP or alphafetoprotein for BCLC allowed a significant improvement of prognostic information. Conclusions: Our results suggest that CLIP staging seems to be most adapted to french patients, it could be better by associating WHO PS. An external validation of our result will be performed on another trial in palliative condition.

[Table: see text]

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Evolution of Approach Through Three Eras

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis is recommended for high-risk patients, while preemptive therapy is considered acceptable for patients at moderate/low risk. After reviewing kidney transplant patients from 1992-1995 and 1996-1999, we decided to replace prophylaxis by preemptive therapy. Herein we have presented our data. From 1996-1999 we treated 129 patients with ganciclovir prophylaxis for 3 months if D+/R- or if they received depleting antibodies. The incidence of CMV was 13.2% versus 3.7% in the 1992-1995 cohort. The increase was associated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) use (P = .002). Forty-two percent of the D+/R- developed an infection with 89% of bouts occurring in the first month after cessation of prophylaxis. From 2002-2004, we never gave prophylaxis to 129 patients except when they received thymoglobulin. High-risk D+/R- patients were monitored by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) CMV for 3 months. The incidence of CMV was 17.1% with 54% of the D+/R- developing CMV. CMV infection occurred mostly during the first trimester posttransplantation. Creatinine at 1 year posttransplantation was worse in the presence of CMV infection (154.3 mumol/L-1.75 mg % versus 130.2 mumol/L-1.47 mg %, P = .03). Time to cure CMV infection was longer when MMF was discontinued: 36.7 days versus 69.9 days (P = .026). Our results indicated that CMV incidence is increasing: 3.7% (1992-1995) --> 13.2% (1996-1999) -->17.1% (2002-2004) and that it impairs 1 year graft function. Recovery was faster among patients still receiving MMF compared with those discontinuing MMF. Although MMF inhibits synthesis of anti-CMV IgM, it increases the anti-herpes virus effect of ganciclovir and may protect against chronic allograft nephropathy. Based on our experience, we plan to reintroduce prophylaxis in high-risk patients and to continue MMF when treating CMV infection.