1
|
Kishi N, Yoneyama M, Inoo H, Inoue M, Iramina H, Nakakura A, Ono T, Hirashima H, Adachi T, Matsushita N, Sasaki M, Fujimoto T, Nakamura M, Matsuo Y, Mizowaki T. Protocol of a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of deep-inspiration breath-hold daily online adaptive radiotherapy for centrally located lung tumours (PUDDING study). Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:32. [PMID: 38459580 PMCID: PMC10921600 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02427-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Centrally located lung tumours present a challenge because of their tendency to exhibit symptoms such as airway obstruction, atelectasis, and bleeding. Surgical resection of these tumours often requires sacrificing the lungs, making definitive radiotherapy the preferred alternative to avoid pneumonectomy. However, the proximity of these tumours to mediastinal organs at risk increases the potential for severe adverse events. To mitigate this risk, we propose a dual-method approach: deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) radiotherapy combined with adaptive radiotherapy. The aim of this single-centre, single-arm phase II study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of DIBH daily online adaptive radiotherapy. METHODS Patients diagnosed with centrally located lung tumours according to the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer recommendations, are enrolled and subjected to DIBH daily online adaptive radiotherapy. The primary endpoint is the one-year cumulative incidence of grade 3 or more severe adverse events, as classified by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0). DISCUSSION Delivering definitive radiotherapy for centrally located lung tumours presents a dilemma between ensuring optimal dose coverage for the planning target volume and the associated increased risk of adverse events. DIBH provides measurable dosimetric benefits by increasing the normal lung volume and distancing the tumour from critical mediastinal organs at risk, leading to reduced toxicity. DIBH adaptive radiotherapy has been proposed as an adjunct treatment option for abdominal and pelvic cancers. If the application of DIBH adaptive radiotherapy to centrally located lung tumours proves successful, this approach could shape future phase III trials and offer novel perspectives in lung tumour radiotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered at the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT; https://jrct.niph.go.jp/ ); registration number: jRCT1052230085 ( https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT1052230085 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noriko Kishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
| | - Masahiro Yoneyama
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Inoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Minoru Inoue
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Hiraku Iramina
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Akiyoshi Nakakura
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Ono
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Hideaki Hirashima
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Takanori Adachi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | | | - Makoto Sasaki
- Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Mitsuhiro Nakamura
- Department of Information Technology and Medical Engineering, Division of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medicine, Human Health Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yukinori Matsuo
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, 377-2, Onohigashi, Osakasayama-Shi, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan
| | - Takashi Mizowaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Csiki E, Simon M, Papp J, Barabás M, Mikáczó J, Gál K, Sipos D, Kovács Á. Stereotactic body radiotherapy in lung cancer: a contemporary review. Pathol Oncol Res 2024; 30:1611709. [PMID: 38476352 PMCID: PMC10928908 DOI: 10.3389/pore.2024.1611709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
The treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has improved enormously in the last two decades. Although surgery is not the only choice, lobectomy is still the gold standard treatment type for operable patients. For inoperable patients stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) should be offered, reaching very high local control and overall survival rates. With SBRT we can precisely irradiate small, well-defined lesions with high doses. To select the appropriate fractionation schedule it is important to determine the size, localization and extent of the lung tumor. The introduction of novel and further developed planning (contouring guidelines, diagnostic image application, planning systems) and delivery techniques (motion management, image guided radiotherapy) led to lower rates of side effects and more conformal target volume coverage. The purpose of this study is to summarize the current developments, randomised studies, guidelines about lung SBRT, with emphasis on the possibility of increasing local control and overall rates in "fit," operable patients as well, so SBRT would be eligible in place of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emese Csiki
- Department of Oncoradiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
- Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Mihály Simon
- Department of Oncoradiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Judit Papp
- Department of Oncoradiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Márton Barabás
- Department of Oncoradiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
- Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Johanna Mikáczó
- Department of Oncoradiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
- Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Kristóf Gál
- Department of Oncoradiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - David Sipos
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Árpád Kovács
- Department of Oncoradiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Safavi AH, Palma DA, Giuliani ME. Beyond the HILUS Trial: How Can We Improve the Safety of SABR for Ultracentral Thoracic Tumors? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:1232-1235. [PMID: 37980143 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Amir H Safavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David A Palma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Meredith E Giuliani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Duda D, Gkika E, Firat E, Adebahr S, Graf E, Eichhorst A, Radicioni G, Lo S, Spohn S, Nestle U, Nicolay N, Niedermann G, Grosu AL. A prospective study of immune responses in patients with lung metastases treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy with or without concurrent systemic treatment. Res Sq 2023:rs.3.rs-3547043. [PMID: 38014120 PMCID: PMC10680912 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3547043/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
We prospectively evaluated the effects of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) on circulating immune cells. Patients with oligo-metastatic and oligo-progressive pulmonary lesions were treated with SBRT with (cSBRT) or without (SBRT group) concurrent systemic treatment (chemotherapy or immune checkpoint blockade) using different fractionation regimes. Immunoprofiling of peripheral blood cells was performed at baseline, during, at the end of SBRT, and at the first and second follow-ups. The study accrued 100 patients (80 with evaluable samples). The proportion of proliferating CD8+ T-cells significantly increased after treatment. This increase remained significant at follow-up in the SBRT group, but not in the cSBRT group and was not detected with doses of >10Gy per fraction indicating that lower doses are necessary to increase proliferating T-cells' frequency. We detected no favorable impact of concurrent systemic treatment on systemic immune responses. The optimal timing of systemic treatment may be post-SBRT to leverage the immune-modulating effects of SBRT.
Collapse
|
5
|
Dasgupta Q, Jiang A, Wen AM, Mannix RJ, Man Y, Hall S, Javorsky E, Ingber DE. A human lung alveolus-on-a-chip model of acute radiation-induced lung injury. Nat Commun 2023; 14:6506. [PMID: 37845224 PMCID: PMC10579267 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-42171-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Acute exposure to high-dose gamma radiation due to radiological disasters or cancer radiotherapy can result in radiation-induced lung injury (RILI), characterized by acute pneumonitis and subsequent lung fibrosis. A microfluidic organ-on-a-chip lined by human lung alveolar epithelium interfaced with pulmonary endothelium (Lung Alveolus Chip) is used to model acute RILI in vitro. Both lung epithelium and endothelium exhibit DNA damage, cellular hypertrophy, upregulation of inflammatory cytokines, and loss of barrier function within 6 h of radiation exposure, although greater damage is observed in the endothelium. The radiation dose sensitivity observed on-chip is more like the human lung than animal preclinical models. The Alveolus Chip is also used to evaluate the potential ability of two drugs - lovastatin and prednisolone - to suppress the effects of acute RILI. These data demonstrate that the Lung Alveolus Chip provides a human relevant alternative for studying the molecular basis of acute RILI and may be useful for evaluation of new radiation countermeasure therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Queeny Dasgupta
- Vascular Biology Program and Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Amanda Jiang
- Vascular Biology Program and Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Amy M Wen
- Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Robert J Mannix
- Vascular Biology Program and Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Yuncheng Man
- Vascular Biology Program and Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Sean Hall
- Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Emilia Javorsky
- Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Donald E Ingber
- Vascular Biology Program and Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
- Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
- Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stanic K, But-Hadzic J, Zagar J, Vrankar M. Local control and survival after stereotactic body radiation therapy of early-stage lung cancer patients in Slovenia. Radiol Oncol 2023; 57:389-396. [PMID: 37494591 PMCID: PMC10476907 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2023-0032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) precisely and non-invasively delivers ablative radiation dose to tumors in early-stage lung cancer patients who are not candidates for surgery or refuse it. The aim of research was to evaluate local control, overall survival (OS), local progression free survival (LPFS), distant metastases free survival (DMFS), disease free survival (DFS) and toxicity in early-stage lung cancer patients treated with SBRT in a single tertiary cancer centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated medical records and radiation treatment plan parameters of 228 tumors irradiated in 206 early-stage lung cancer patients between 2016 and 2021 at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana. RESULTS After 25 months of median follow up, 68 of 206 (33%) patients died. Median OS was 46 months (CI 36-56), 1-year, 2-year and 3-year OS were 87%, 74% and 62% and 5-year OS was 31%. A total of 45 disease progressions have been identified in 41 patients. Local progress only was noticed in 5 (2%) patients, systemic progress in 32 (16%) and combined systemic and local in 4 (2%) patients. Local control rate (LCR) at 1 year was 98%, at 2 and 3 years 96% and 95% at 5 years. The 1-, 2- and 3-year LPFS were 98%, 96% and 94%, respectively and 5-year LPFS was 82%. One, 2-, 3- and 5-year DFS were 89%, 81%, 72% and 49%, respectively. Among 28 toxicities recorded only one was Grade 4 (pneumonitis), all others were Grade 1 or 2. No differences in LCR, LPFS, DFS were found in univariate analysis comparing patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. For OS the only statistically significant difference was found in patients with more than 3 comorbidities compared to those with less comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS Early lung cancer treated with SBRT at single tertiary cancer centre showed that LCR, LPFS, DFS, DMFS and OS were comparable to published studies. Patients with many comorbidities had significantly worse overall survival compared to those with less comorbidities. No other significant differences by patient, tumor, or treatment characteristics were found for DMFS, LPFS, and DFS. Toxicity data confirmed that treatment was well tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karmen Stanic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Jasna But-Hadzic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Jan Zagar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Martina Vrankar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yan M, Louie AV, Kotecha R, Ashfaq Ahmed M, Zhang Z, Guckenberger M, Kim MS, Lo SS, Scorsetti M, Tree AC, Sahgal A, Slotman BJ. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for Ultra-Central lung Tumors: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society practice guidelines. Lung Cancer 2023; 182:107281. [PMID: 37393758 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.107281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an effective and safe modality for early-stage lung cancer and lung metastases. However, tumors in an ultra-central location pose unique safety considerations. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the current safety and efficacy data and provide practice recommendations on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS). METHODS We performed a systematic review using PubMed and EMBASE databases of patients with ultra-central lung tumors treated with SBRT. Studies reporting local control (LC) and/or toxicity were included. Studies with <5 treated lesions, non-English language, re-irradiation, nodal tumors, or mixed outcomes in which ultra-central tumors could not be discerned were excluded. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed for studies reporting relevant endpoints. Meta-regression was conducted to determine the effect of various covariates on the primary outcomes. RESULTS 602 unique studies were identified of which 27 (one prospective observational, the remainder retrospective) were included, representing 1183 treated targets. All studies defined ultra-central as the planning target volume (PTV) overlapping the proximal bronchial tree (PBT). The most common dose fractionations were 50 Gy/5, 60 Gy/8, and 60 Gy/12 fractions. The pooled 1- and 2-year LC estimates were 92 % and 89 %, respectively. Meta-regression identified biological effective dose (BED10) as a significant predictor of 1-year LC. A total of 109 grade 3-4 toxicity events, with a pooled incidence of 6 %, were reported, most commonly pneumonitis. There were 73 treatment related deaths, with a pooled incidence of 4 %, with the most common being hemoptysis. Anticoagulation, interstitial lung disease, endobronchial tumor, and concomitant targeted therapies were observed risk factors for fatal toxicity events. CONCLUSION SBRT for ultra-central lung tumors results in acceptable rates of local control, albeit with risks of severe toxicity. Caution should be taken for appropriate patient selection, consideration of concomitant therapies, and radiotherapy plan design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, USA
| | - Md Ashfaq Ahmed
- Center for Advanced Analytics, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, USA
| | - Zhenwei Zhang
- Center for Advanced Analytics, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, USA
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mi-Sook Kim
- Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiosurgery and Radiotherapy Department, IRCCS-Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele-Milan, Italy
| | - Alison C Tree
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ben J Slotman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Xiong Y, Jiang P, Wei S, Li M, Yang Y, Xiong L, Wang J, Li C. Harnessing NK cell-based immunotherapy to prevent the high-dose radiotherapy-inducing tumor survival recurrence. Int Immunopharmacol 2023; 120:110288. [PMID: 37196560 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
Natural killer cells play crucial roles in tumor immunosurveillance and serve as first responders to recognize abnormal cells. Radiotherapy is the mainstay of cancer treatment. However, the effect of high-dose radiotherapy on NK cells remains elusive. Here, we used tumor-bearing mice in the murine colorectal cancer cell line, MC38. The function of NK cells in tumor-draining lymph nodes and tumors was explored after the mice were treated using radiotherapy with 20 Gy and/or blocking antibody αTIGIT at the indicated time. High-dose radiotherapy shaped an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment to support tumor growth, showing a decreased anti-tumor immunity phenotype in which effector T cells were reduced significantly. Furthermore, the production of functional cytokines and markers in NK cells, including CD107a, granzyme B, and IFN-γ, also remarkably decreased after radiotherapy, while the inhibitory receptor TIGIT was significantly upregulated by FACS analysis. The effect of radiotherapy was significantly elevated after treatment with the combination of radiotherapy and TIGIT inhibition. Moreover, this combination significantly decreased tumor recurrence. Our findings reported that local single high-dose radiotherapy shaped the immunosuppressive microenvironment and inhibited the function of NK cells. Our study revealed compelling evidence suggesting that the enhancement of NK cell function through TIGIT targeting is an effective strategy to mitigate immune suppression caused by high-dose radiotherapy, thereby promoting the inhibition of tumor recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Xiong
- Institute of Medical Technology, Peking University Health Science Center; Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Ping Jiang
- Institute of Medical Technology, Peking University Health Science Center; Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Shuhua Wei
- Institute of Medical Technology, Peking University Health Science Center; Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Mengyuan Li
- Institute of Medical Technology, Peking University Health Science Center; Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Yuhan Yang
- Institute of Medical Technology, Peking University Health Science Center; Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Liting Xiong
- Institute of Medical Technology, Peking University Health Science Center; Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Junjie Wang
- Institute of Medical Technology, Peking University Health Science Center; Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
| | - Chunxiao Li
- Institute of Medical Technology, Peking University Health Science Center; Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gkika E, Firat E, Adebahr S, Graf E, Popp I, Radicioni G, Lo SS, Nestle U, Nicolay NH, Niedermann G, Duda DG, Grosu AL. Systemic immune modulation by stereotactic radiotherapy in early-stage lung cancer. NPJ Precis Oncol 2023; 7:24. [PMID: 36864234 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-023-00358-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023] Open
Abstract
We performed a prospective study of circulating immune cell changes after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in 50 early-stage NSCLC patients. We found no significant increase in CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes at first follow-up (the primary endpoint) but detected a significant increase in expanding Ki-67+CD8+ and Ki-67+CD4+ T-cell fractions in patients treated with 10 Gy or less per fraction. SBRT can induce significant expansion in circulating effector T-cells immediately post-treatment.
Collapse
|
10
|
Kang TM, Hardcastle N, Singh AK, Slotman BJ, Videtic GMM, Stephans KL, Couñago F, Louie AV, Guckenberger M, Harden SV, Plumridge NM, Siva S. Practical considerations of single-fraction stereotactic ablative radiotherapy to the lung. Lung Cancer 2022; 170:185-193. [PMID: 35843149 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a well-established treatment for patients with medically inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and pulmonary oligometastases. The use of single-fraction SABR in this setting is supported by excellent local control and safety profiles which appear equivalent to multi-fraction SABR based on the available data. The resource efficiency and reduction in hospital outpatient visits associated with single-fraction SABR have been particularly advantageous during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the increased interest, single-fraction SABR in subgroups of patients remains controversial, including those with centrally located tumours, synchronous targets, proximity to dose-limiting organs at risk, and concomitant severe respiratory illness. This review provides an overview of the published randomised evidence evaluating single-fraction SABR in primary lung cancer and pulmonary oligometastases, the common clinical challenges faced, immunogenic effect of SABR, as well as technical and cost-utility considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Therese Mj Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nicholas Hardcastle
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum, Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anurag K Singh
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Ben J Slotman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gregory M M Videtic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Kevin L Stephans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Susan V Harden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nikki M Plumridge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Shankar Siva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum, Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cuccia F, Mazzola R, Figlia V, Giaj-Levra N, Nicosia L, Ricchetti F, Rigo M, Attinà G, Vitale C, Pastorello E, Ruggieri R, Alongi F. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for pulmonary oligometastases: a monoinstitutional analysis of clinical outcomes and potential prognostic factors. Strahlenther Onkol 2022; 198:934-939. [DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01951-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
12
|
Diez P, Hanna GG, Aitken KL, van As N, Carver A, Colaco RJ, Conibear J, Dunne EM, Eaton DJ, Franks KN, Good JS, Harrow S, Hatfield P, Hawkins MA, Jain S, McDonald F, Patel R, Rackley T, Sanghera P, Tree A, Murray L. UK 2022 Consensus on Normal Tissue Dose-Volume Constraints for Oligometastatic, Primary Lung and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:288-300. [PMID: 35272913 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The use of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in the UK has expanded over the past decade, in part as the result of several UK clinical trials and a recent NHS England Commissioning through Evaluation programme. A UK SABR Consortium consensus for normal tissue constraints for SABR was published in 2017, based on the existing literature at the time. The published literature regarding SABR has increased in volume over the past 5 years and multiple UK centres are currently working to develop new SABR services. A review and update of the previous consensus is therefore appropriate and timely. It is hoped that this document will provide a useful resource to facilitate safe and consistent SABR practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Diez
- Radiotherapy Physics, National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group (RTTQA), Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - G G Hanna
- Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK; Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - K L Aitken
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - N van As
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Chelsea, London, UK
| | - A Carver
- Department of Medical Physics, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - R J Colaco
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - J Conibear
- Radiotherapy Department, Barts Cancer Centre, London, UK
| | - E M Dunne
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D J Eaton
- Radiotherapy Physics, National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group (RTTQA), Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK; Department of Medical Physics, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - K N Franks
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospitals, Leeds, UK
| | - J S Good
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Harrow
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - P Hatfield
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospitals, Leeds, UK
| | - M A Hawkins
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; Department of Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S Jain
- Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK; Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - F McDonald
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Chelsea, London, UK
| | - R Patel
- Radiotherapy Physics, National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group (RTTQA), Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - T Rackley
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - P Sanghera
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - A Tree
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - L Murray
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospitals, Leeds, UK; Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fernández C, Navarro-Martin A, Bobo A, Cabrera-Rodriguez J, Calvo P, Chicas-Sett R, Luna J, Rodríguez de Dios N, Couñago F. Single-fraction stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy for primary and metastasic lung tumor: A new paradigm? World J Clin Oncol 2022; 13:101-115. [PMID: 35316929 PMCID: PMC8894272 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i2.101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2021] [Revised: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is an effective technique comparable to surgery in terms of local control and efficacy in early stages of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and pulmonary metastasis. Several fractionation schemes have proven to be safe and effective, including the single fraction (SF) scheme. SF is an option cost-effectiveness, more convenience and comfortable for the patient and flexible in terms of its management combined with systemic treatments. The outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic has driven this not new but underutilized paradigm, recommending this option to minimize patients’ visits to hospital. SF SABR already has a long experience, strong evidence and sufficient maturity to reliably evaluate outcomes in peripheral primary NSCLC and there are promising outcomes in pulmonary metastases, making it a valid treatment option; although its use in central locations, synchronous and recurrencies tumors requires more prospective safety and efficacy studies. The SABR radiobiology study, together with the combination with systemic therapies, (targeted therapies and immunotherapy) is a direction of research in both advanced disease and early stages whose future includes SF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Castalia Fernández
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare Madrid, Madrid 28043, Spain
| | - Arturo Navarro-Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Catalá d’Oncologia, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona 08908, Spain
| | - Andrea Bobo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid 28034, Spain
| | | | - Patricia Calvo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospitalario Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela 15706, Spain
| | - Rodolfo Chicas-Sett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ASCIRES Grupo Biomédico, Valencia 46004, Spain
| | - Javier Luna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid 28040, Spain
| | | | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Madrid 28223, Spain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital La Luz, Madrid 28223, Spain
- Department of Medicine, School of Biomedical Sciences, Universidad Europea, Madrid 28223, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kishi N, Matsuo Y, Yoneyama M, Ueki K, Mizowaki T. Symptomatic radiation pneumonitis after stereotactic body radiotherapy for multiple pulmonary oligometastases or synchronous primary lung cancer. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100911. [PMID: 35647407 PMCID: PMC9133396 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
15
|
Vaz SC, Adam JA, Bolton RCD, Vera P, van Elmpt W, Herrmann K, Hicks RJ, Lievens Y, Santos A, Schöder H, Dubray B, Visvikis D, Troost EGC, de Geus-Oei LF. Joint EANM/SNMMI/ESTRO practice recommendations for the use of 2-[ 18F]FDG PET/CT external beam radiation treatment planning in lung cancer V1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 49:1386-1406. [PMID: 35022844 PMCID: PMC8921015 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05624-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose 2-[18F]FDG
PET/CT is of utmost importance for radiation treatment (RT) planning and response monitoring in lung cancer patients, in both non-small and small cell lung cancer (NSCLC and SCLC). This topic has been addressed in guidelines composed by experts within the field of radiation oncology. However, up to present, there is no procedural guideline on this subject, with involvement of the nuclear medicine societies. Methods A literature review was performed, followed by a discussion between a multidisciplinary team of experts in the different fields involved in the RT planning of lung cancer, in order to guide clinical management. The project was led by experts of the two nuclear medicine societies (EANM and SNMMI) and radiation oncology (ESTRO). Results and conclusion This guideline results from a joint and dynamic collaboration between the relevant disciplines for this topic. It provides a worldwide, state of the art, and multidisciplinary guide to 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT RT planning in NSCLC and SCLC. These practical recommendations describe applicable updates for existing clinical practices, highlight potential flaws, and provide solutions to overcome these as well. Finally, the recent developments considered for future application are also reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia C Vaz
- Nuclear Medicine Radiopharmacology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unkown, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.,Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Judit A Adam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roberto C Delgado Bolton
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging (Radiology) and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital San Pedro and Centre for Biomedical Research of La Rioja (CIBIR), Logroño (La Rioja), Spain
| | - Pierre Vera
- Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, QuantIF-LITIS EA 4108, Université de Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Wouter van Elmpt
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Rodney J Hicks
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Yolande Lievens
- Radiation Oncology Department, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Andrea Santos
- Nuclear Medicine Department, CUF Descobertas Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Heiko Schöder
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Bernard Dubray
- Department of Radiotherapy and Medical Physics, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France.,QuantIF-LITIS EA4108, University of Rouen, Rouen, France
| | | | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association / Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Guillaume E, Tanguy R, Ayadi M, Claude L, Sotton S, Moncharmont C, Magné N, Martel-Lafay I. Toxicity and efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy for ultra-central lung tumours: a single institution real life experience. Br J Radiol 2022; 95:20210533. [PMID: 34797724 PMCID: PMC8722247 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to treat ultra-central lung tumours remains more controversial than for peripheral and central tumours. Our objective was to assess toxicities, local control (LC) rate and survival data in patients with ultra-central lung tumours treated with SBRT. METHODS We conducted a retrospective and monocentric study about 74 patients with an ultra-central lung tumour, consecutively treated between 2012 and 2018. Ultra-central tumours were defined as tumours whose planning target volume overlapped one of the following organs at risk (OARs): the trachea, right and left main bronchi, intermediate bronchus, lobe bronchi, oesophagus, heart. RESULTS Median follow-up was 25 months. Two patients (2.7%) showed Grade 3 toxicity. No Grade 4 or 5 toxicity was observed. 11% of patients experienced primary local relapse. LC rate was 96.7% at 1 year and 87.6% at 2 years. Median progression free survival was 12 months. Median overall survival was 31 months. CONCLUSION SBRT for ultra-central tumours remains safe and effective as long as protecting organs at risk is treatment-planning priority. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE The present study is one of the rare to describe exclusively ultra-central tumours through real-life observational case reports. Globally, literature analysis reveals a large heterogeneity in ultra-central lung tumours definition, prescribed dose, number of fractions. In our study, patients treated with SBRT for ultra-central lung tumours experienced few Grade 3 toxicities (2.7%) and no Grade 4 or 5 toxicities, due to the highest compliance with dose constraints to OARs. LC remained efficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ronan Tanguy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Léon Bérard Cancer Centre, Lyon, France
| | - Myriam Ayadi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Léon Bérard Cancer Centre, Lyon, France
| | - Line Claude
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Léon Bérard Cancer Centre, Lyon, France
| | - Sandrine Sotton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Centre, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | | | - Nicolas Magné
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Centre, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Palm RF, Eicher KG, Sim AJ, Peneguy S, Rosenberg SA, Wasserman S, Johnstone PAS. Assessment of MRI-Linac Economics under the RO-APM. J Clin Med 2021; 10:4706. [PMID: 34682829 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10204706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
The implementation of the radiation oncology alternative payment model (RO-APM) has raised concerns regarding the development of MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART). We sought to compare technical fee reimbursement under Fee-For-Service (FFS) to the proposed RO-APM for a typical MRI-Linac (MRL) patient load and distribution of 200 patients. In an exploratory aim, a modifier was added to the RO-APM (mRO-APM) to account for the resources necessary to provide this care. Traditional Medicare FFS reimbursement rates were compared to the diagnosis-based reimbursement in the RO-APM. Reimbursement for all selected diagnoses were lower in the RO-APM compared to FFS, with the largest differences in the adaptive treatments for lung cancer (−89%) and pancreatic cancer (−83%). The total annual reimbursement discrepancy amounted to −78%. Without implementation of adaptive replanning there was no difference in reimbursement in breast, colorectal and prostate cancer between RO-APM and mRO-APM. Accommodating online adaptive treatments in the mRO-APM would result in a reimbursement difference from the FFS model of −47% for lung cancer and −46% for pancreatic cancer, mitigating the overall annual reimbursement difference to −54%. Even with adjustment, the implementation of MRgART as a new treatment strategy is susceptible under the RO-APM.
Collapse
|
18
|
Brown S, Beasley M, Aznar MC, Belderbos J, Chuter R, Cobben D, Faivre-Finn C, Franks K, Henry A, Murray L, Price G, van Herk M. The Impact of Intra-thoracic Anatomical Changes upon the Delivery of Lung Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:e413-e421. [PMID: 34001380 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Revised: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
AIMS So far, the impact of intra-thoracic anatomical changes (ITACs) on patients treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer is unknown. Studying these is important, as ITACs have the potential to impact the workflow and reduce treatment quality. The aim of this study was to assess and categorise ITACs, as detected on cone beam computed tomography scans (CBCT), and their subsequent impact upon treatment in lung cancer patients treated with SABR. MATERIALS AND METHODS CBCTs from 100 patients treated with SABR for early non-small cell lung cancer were retrospectively reviewed. The presence of the following ITACs was assessed: atelectasis, infiltrative change, pleural effusion, baseline shift and gross tumour volume (GTV) increase and decrease. ITACs were graded using a traffic light protocol. This was adapted from a tool previously developed to assesses potential target undercoverage or organ at risk overdose. The frequency of physics or clinician review was noted. A linear mixed effects model was used to assess the relationship between ITAC grade and set-up time (time from first CBCT to beam delivery). RESULTS ITACs were observed in 22% of patients. Twenty-one per cent of these were categorised as 'red', implying a risk of underdosage to the GTV. Most were 'yellow' (51%), indicating little impact upon planning target volume coverage of the GTV. Physics or clinician review was required in 10% of all treatment fractions overall. Three patients needed their treatment replanned. The mixed effect model analysis showed that ITACs cause a significant prolongation of set-up time (Χ2(3) = 9.22, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION Most ITACs were minor, but associated with unplanned physics or clinician review, representing a potentially significant resource burden. ITACs also had a significant impact upon set-up time, with consequences for the wider workflow and intra-fraction motion. Detailed guidance on the management of ITACs is needed to provide support for therapeutic radiographers delivering lung SABR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Brown
- Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Gloucestershire Oncology Centre, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, UK.
| | - M Beasley
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - M C Aznar
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - J Belderbos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R Chuter
- Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - D Cobben
- Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - C Faivre-Finn
- Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - K Franks
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - A Henry
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK; Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - L Murray
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK; Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - G Price
- Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - M van Herk
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fechter T, Adebahr S, Grosu AL, Baltas D. Measuring breathing induced oesophageal motion and its dosimetric impact. Phys Med 2021; 88:9-19. [PMID: 34153886 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiation therapy allows for a precise dose delivery. Organ motion bears the risk of undetected high dose healthy tissue exposure. An organ very susceptible to high dose is the oesophagus. Its low contrast on CT and the oblong shape render motion estimation difficult. We tackle this issue by modern algorithms to measure oesophageal motion voxel-wise and estimate motion related dosimetric impacts. METHODS Oesophageal motion was measured using deformable image registration and 4DCT of 11 internal and 5 public datasets. Current clinical practice of contouring the organ on 3DCT was compared to timely resolved 4DCT contours. Dosimetric impacts of the motion were estimated by analysing the trajectory of each voxel in the 4D dose distribution. Finally an organ motion model for patient-wise comparisons was built. RESULTS Motion analysis showed mean absolute maximal motion amplitudes of 4.55 ± 1.81 mm left-right, 5.29 ± 2.67 mm anterior-posterior and 10.78 ± 5.30 mm superior-inferior. Motion between cohorts differed significantly. In around 50% of the cases the dosimetric passing criteria was violated. Contours created on 3DCT did not cover 14% of the organ for 50% of the respiratory cycle and were around 38% smaller than the union of all 4D contours. The motion model revealed that the maximal motion is not limited to the lower part of the organ. Our results showed motion amplitudes higher than most reported values in the literature and that motion is very heterogeneous across patients. CONCLUSIONS Individual motion information should be considered in contouring and planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Fechter
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Sonja Adebahr
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dimos Baltas
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Luna J, Sotoca A, Fernández P, Miralles C, Rodríguez A. Recent advances in early stage lung cancer. J Clin Transl Res 2021; 7:163-174. [PMID: 34104819 PMCID: PMC8177843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer has undergone considerable change in recent years. Areas of great interest to researchers include less invasive surgical methods with lower associated morbidity, indications for adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the emergence of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for peripheral and central or ultracentral tumors, and the probable role of adjuvant immunotherapy following surgery and SBRT, all of which may influence the management of these patients. RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS At present, the treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer is undergoing changes associated with the evolution of existing treatments and the advent of new treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Luna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Amalia Sotoca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruber International, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pablo Fernández
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Celia Miralles
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ruber Clinic, Madrid, Spain
| | - Aurora Rodríguez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruber International, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Alongi F, Nicosia L, Figlia V, De Sanctis V, Mazzola R, Giaj-Levra N, Reverberi C, Valeriani M, Osti MF. A multi-institutional analysis of fractionated versus single-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the treatment of primary lung tumors: a comparison between two antipodal fractionations. Clin Transl Oncol 2021; 23:2133-2140. [PMID: 33840047 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-021-02619-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a consolidate treatment for inoperable early-stage lung tumors, usually delivered in single or multi-fraction regimens. We aimed to compare these two approaches in terms of local effectiveness, safety and survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients affected by medically inoperable early-stage lung tumor were treated at two Institutions with two different schedules: 70 Gy in ten fractions (TF) (BED10: 119 Gy) or 30 Gy in single fraction (SF) (BED10: 120 Gy). RESULTS 73 patients were treated with SBRT delivered with two biological equivalent schedules: SF (44) and TF (29). The median follow-up was 34 months (range 3-81 months). Three-year Overall survival (OS) was 57.9%, 3-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 77.2%, with no difference between treatment groups. Three-year progression-free survival (LPFS) was 88.9% and did not differs between SF and TF. Overall, four cases (5.4%) of acute grade ≥ 3 pneumonitis occurred. No differences in acute and late toxicity between the two groups were detected. CONCLUSION SF and TF seems to be equally safe and effective in the treatment of primary inoperable lung tumors especially for smaller lesion. The SF may be preferentially offered to reduce patient access to hospital with no negative impact on tumor control and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy
- University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - L Nicosia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy.
| | - V Figlia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy
| | - V De Sanctis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - R Mazzola
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy
| | - N Giaj-Levra
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, via Don Sempreboni 5, 37034, Verona, Negrar, Italy
| | - C Reverberi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - M Valeriani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - M F Osti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Vlaskou Badra E, Baumgartl M, Fabiano S, Jongen A, Guckenberger M. Stereotactic radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: current standards and ongoing research. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2021; 10:1930-1949. [PMID: 34012804 PMCID: PMC8107760 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-20-860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) allows for the non-invasive and precise delivery of ablative radiation dose. The use and availability of SBRT has increased rapidly over the past decades. SBRT has been proven to be a safe, effective and efficient treatment for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is presently considered the standard of care in the treatment of medically or functionally inoperable patients. Evidence from prospective randomized trials on the optimal treatment of patients deemed medically operable remains owing, as three trials comparing SBRT to surgery in this cohort were terminated prematurely due to poor accrual. Yet, SBRT in early stage NSCLC is associated with favorable toxicity profiles and excellent rates of local control, prompting discussion in regard of the treatment of medically operable patients, where the standard of care currently remains surgical resection. Although local control in early stage NSCLC after SBRT is high, distant failure remains an issue, prompting research interest to the combination of SBRT and systemic treatment. Evolving advances in SBRT technology further facilitate the safe treatment of patients with medically or anatomically challenging situations. In this review article, we discuss international guidelines and the current standard of care, ongoing clinical challenges and future directions from the clinical and technical point of view.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugenia Vlaskou Badra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Baumgartl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Silvia Fabiano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Aurélien Jongen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Advancements in imaging and radiotherapy (RT) techniques have allowed for remarkably precise delivery of high radiation dose per treatment fraction to intrathoracic targets. As a non-invasive therapeutic modality (compared to surgery), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an attractive option for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancers and oligometastases, especially for older patients with significant comorbidities and pre-existing pulmonary dysfunction. However, the outcomes and side effect profile of SBRT are highly dependent on tumor location, especially if the tumor is located centrally (within 2 cm of the proximal bronchial tree (PBT)] or ultracentrally (touching or within 1 cm of the mediastinum, esophagus, and PBT). In this focused review, we will examine the contemporary practice and principles of using hypofractionated RT or SBRT for central and ultracentral thoracic tumors. We will identify future directions on how this practice may be incorporated into the increasingly complicated modern paradigm of lung cancer treatments which now include immunotherapy along with proton beam radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn Owen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Terence T Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Loi M, Franceschini D, Dominici L, Chiola I, Franzese C, D'Agostino GR, Navarria P, Marzo M, Paganini L, Comito T, Mancosu P, Tomatis S, Cozzi L, Alifano M, Scorsetti M. Dose coverage impacts local control in ultra-central lung oligometastases treated with stereotactic radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:396-404. [PMID: 32970163 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01687-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The use of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) is controversial in Ultra-Central lung tumors, a subset of central lung tumors characterized by proximity to critical mediastinal structures. This is of interest in oligometastatic (≤3 metastases) patients, who can yield survival benefit from local treatments. The aim of our study is to assess the determinants of efficacy and toxicity in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS Clinical and dosimetric parameters were reviewed in a cohort of oligometastatic patients treated with SBRT for ultra-central tumors. Local control rate (LC) and toxicity were assessed. Statistical Analysis was carried out to assess the impact of those predictors on local recurrence and adverse events. RESULTS One-hundred-nine consecutive patients were included. A median Biologic Effective Dose (BED) of 105 (75-132) Gy10 was prescribed. At a median follow-up of 17 (range 3-78) months, 2-year LC was 87%. Improved LC was correlated to Planning Treatment Volume (PTV) covered by 95% of the prescription dose (V95% PTV) > 85% (HR 0.15, 95%CI 0.05-0.49, p = 0.0017) and to Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) < 90 cm3 (HR 0.2, 95%CI 0.07-0.56, p = 0.0021). Overall and grade ≥ 3 toxicity incidence was 20% and 5%, respectively. Patients experiencing acute and late toxicities received significantly higher dose to 1 cm3 (D1cm3) of esophagus and lung volume receiving ≥5 Gy (V5Gy) (p = 0.016 and p = 0.013), and higher dose to 0.1 cm3 (D0.1cm3) of heart (p = 0.036), respectively. CONCLUSION V95% PTV > 85% and GTV < 90 cm3 are independent predictors of LC. Dose to esophagus, lung and heart should be carefully assessed to minimize treatment-related toxicities.
Collapse
|
25
|
Atalar B, Mustafayev TZ, Sio TT, Sahin B, Gungor G, Aydın G, Yapici B, Ozyar E. Long-term toxicity and survival outcomes after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for patients with centrally located thoracic tumors. Radiol Oncol 2020; 54:480-7. [PMID: 32589607 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2020-0039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is effective for thoracic cancer and metastases; however, adverse effects are greater for central tumors. We evaluated factors affecting outcomes and toxicities after SABR for patients with primary lung and oligometastatic tumors. Patients and methods We retrospectively identified consecutive patients with centrally located lung tumors that were treated at our hospital from 2009-2016. The effects of patient, disease, and treatment-related parameters on local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and toxicity-free survival (TFS) were evaluated with multivariate analyses. Results Among 65 consecutive patients identified with 70 centrally located tumors, 20 tumors (28%) were reirradiated. Median (range) total dose for all tumors was 55 (30–60) Gy in 5 (3–10) fractions. Radiographic complete response was obtained in 43 lesions (61%). None of the analyzed factors were correlated with complete response. After a median follow-up of 57 (95% CI, 48–65) months, 10 tumors (14%) relapsed and 37 patients (57%) died; the actuarial 2- and 5-year OS rates were 52% and 28%, respectively. Median OS was significantly lower in patients with grade 3 or higher toxicity vs. lower toxicity (5 vs. 39 months; P < 0.001). Among 17 severe toxicities, 5 were grade 5, and 3 of them were reirradiated to the same field. Grade 3 to 5 TFS was lower with vs. without reirradiation (2-year TFS, 63% vs. 96%; P = 0.02). Conclusions Our study showed that modern SABR is effective for central lung tumors, and toxicities are acceptable. SABR for reirradiated central lung lesions and possibly for lesions abutting the tracheobronchial tree may result in higher risk of serious toxicities.
Collapse
|
26
|
Cooke R, Camilleri P, Chu KY, O'Cathail SM, Robinson M, Van Den Heuvel F, Hawkins MA. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for moderately central and ultra-central oligometastatic disease: Initial outcomes. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2020; 13:24-30. [PMID: 32128460 PMCID: PMC7042153 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2020.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Revised: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delivery of SBRT to central thoracic tumours within 2 cm of the proximal bronchial tree (PBT), and especially ultra-central tumours which directly abut the PBT, has been controversial due to concerns about high risk of toxicity and treatment-related death when delivering high doses close to critical mediastinal structures. We present dosimetric and clinical outcomes from a group of oligometastatic patients treated with a risk-adapted SBRT approach. METHODS Between September 2015 and October 2018, 27 patients with 28 central thoracic oligometastases (6 moderately central, 22 ultra-central) were treated with 60 Gy in 8 fractions under online CBCT guidance. PTV dose was compromised where necessary to meet mandatory OAR constraints. Patients were followed up for toxicity and disease status. RESULTS Mandatory OAR constraints were met in all cases; this required PTV coverage compromise in 23 cases, with V100% reduced to <70% in 11 cases. No acute or late toxicities of Grade ≥ 3 were reported. One and 2 year in-field control rates were 95.2% and 85.7% respectively, progression-free survival rates were 42.8% and 23.4% respectively, and overall survival rates were 82.7% and 69.5% respectively. No significant differences were seen in control or survival rates by extent of PTV underdosage or between moderately and ultra-central cases. CONCLUSION It appears that compromising PTV coverage to meet OAR constraints allows safe and effective delivery of SBRT to moderately and ultra-central tumours, with low toxicity rates and high in-field control rates. This treatment can be delivered on standard linear accelerators with widely available imaging technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosie Cooke
- Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS FT, Churchill Hospital, Old Road, Oxford OX3 7LE, United Kingdom
| | - Philip Camilleri
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS FT, Churchill Hospital, Old Road, Oxford OX3 7LE, United Kingdom
| | - Kwun-Ye Chu
- Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS FT, Churchill Hospital, Old Road, Oxford OX3 7LE, United Kingdom
| | - Séan M. O'Cathail
- Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom
| | - Maxwell Robinson
- Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS FT, Churchill Hospital, Old Road, Oxford OX3 7LE, United Kingdom
| | - Frank Van Den Heuvel
- Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS FT, Churchill Hospital, Old Road, Oxford OX3 7LE, United Kingdom
| | - Maria A. Hawkins
- Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Malet Place Engineering Building, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Brown S, Banfill K, Aznar MC, Whitehurst P, Faivre Finn C. The evolving role of radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20190524. [PMID: 31535580 PMCID: PMC6913359 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2019] [Revised: 08/06/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and biggest cause of cancer mortality worldwide with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for most cases. Radiotherapy (RT) plays a key role in its management and is used at least once in over half of patients in both curative and palliative treatments. This narrative review will demonstrate how the evolution of RT for NSCLC has been underpinned by improvements in RT technology. These improvements have facilitated geometric individualization, increasingly accurate treatment and now offer the ability to deliver truly individualized RT. In this review, we summarize and discuss recent developments in the field of advanced RT in early stage, locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC. We highlight limitations in current approaches and discuss future potential treatment strategies for patients with NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Brown
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Philip Whitehurst
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering (CMPE), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rulach R, McLoone P, Lumsden G, McKay S, MacLaren V, Macphee J, Moore K, Omand M, Sproule M, Currie S, Aitken A, Ferguson R, Valentine R, Houston P, Harrow S, Hicks J. Toxicity and Efficacy of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Moderately Central Non-small Cell Lung Cancers Using 50 Gy in Five Fractions. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 32:250-258. [PMID: 31607611 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.09.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2019] [Revised: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy doses for peripheral lung lesions caused high toxicity when used for central non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To determine a safe stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy dose for central tumours, the phase I/II Radiation Therapy Oncology Group RTOG 0813 trial used 50 Gy/five fractions as a baseline. From 2013, 50 Gy/five fractions was adopted at the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre for inoperable early stage central NSCLC. We report our prospectively collected toxicity and efficacy data. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patient and treatment characteristics were obtained from electronic medical records. Tumours were classed as moderately central or ultra-central tumours using published definitions. Toxicity was assessed in a centralised follow-up clinic at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after treatment. RESULTS Fifty patients (31 women, 19 men, median age 75.1 years) were identified with T1-2N0M0 moderately central NSCLC; one patient had both an ultra-central and a moderately central tumour. Eighty-four per cent were medically unfit for surgery. Forty per cent had biopsy-proven NSCLC and 60% were diagnosed radiologically using 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging. Fifty-six per cent of patients were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 2 or worse. All patients received 50 Gy/five fractions on alternate days on schedule. Two patients died within 90 days of treatment, one from a chest infection, the other cause of death was unknown. There was one episode of early grade 3 oesophagitis and one grade 3 late dyspnoea. There was no grade 4 toxicity. Over a median follow-up of 25.2 months (range 1-70 months), there were 34 deaths: 18 unrelated to cancer and 16 due to cancer recurrence. The median overall survival was 27.0 months (95% confidence interval 20.6-35.9) and cancer-specific survival was 39.8 months (95% confidence interval 28.6, not reached). CONCLUSION This study has shown that 50 Gy/five fractions is a safe dose and fractionation for early stage inoperable moderately central NSCLC, with outcomes comparable with other series, even with patients with a poor performance status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Rulach
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK.
| | - P McLoone
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - G Lumsden
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - S McKay
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - V MacLaren
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - J Macphee
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - K Moore
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - M Omand
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - M Sproule
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - S Currie
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - A Aitken
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - R Ferguson
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - R Valentine
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - P Houston
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - S Harrow
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - J Hicks
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Meng MB, Wang HH, Zaorsky NG, Sun BS, Zhu L, Song YC, Li FT, Dong Y, Wang JS, Chen HM, Yu XY, Yuan ZY. Risk-adapted stereotactic body radiation therapy for central and ultra-central early-stage inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Sci 2019; 110:3553-3564. [PMID: 31464032 PMCID: PMC6825012 DOI: 10.1111/cas.14185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2019] [Revised: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 08/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
To determine the therapeutic efficacy and safety of risk‐adapted stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) schedules for patients with early‐stage central and ultra‐central inoperable non‐small cell lung cancer. From 2006 to 2015, 80 inoperable T1‐2N0M0 NSCLC patients were treated with two median dose levels: 60 Gy in six fractions (range, 48‐60 Gy in 4‐8 fractions) prescribed to the 74% isodose line (range, 58%‐79%) for central lesions (ie within 2 cm of, but not abutting, the proximal bronchial tree; n = 43), and 56 Gy in seven fractions (range, 48‐60 Gy in 5‐10 fractions) prescribed to the 74% isodose line (range, 60%‐80%) for ultra‐central lesions (ie abutting the proximal bronchial tree; n = 37) on consecutive days. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included progression‐free survival (PFS), tumor local control rate (LC), and toxicity. Median OS and PFS were 64.47 and 32.10 months (respectively) for ultra‐central patients, and not reached for central patients. Median time to local failure, regional failure, and any distant failures for central versus ultra‐central lesions were: 27.37 versus 26.07 months, 20.90 versus 12.53 months, and 20.85 versus 15.53 months, respectively, all P < .05. Multivariate analyses showed that tumor categorization (ultra‐central) and planning target volume ≥52.76 mL were poor prognostic factors of OS, PFS, and LC, respectively (all P < .05). There was one grade 5 toxicity; all other toxicities were grade 1‐2. Our results showed that ultra‐central tumors have a poor OS, PFS, and LC compared with central patients because of the use of risk‐adapted SBRT schedules that allow for equal and favorable toxicity profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mao-Bin Meng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center, and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Huan-Huan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center, and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Nicholas G Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Bing-Shen Sun
- Department of Lung Cancer and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Lei Zhu
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Yong-Chun Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center, and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Feng-Tong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center, and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Yang Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center, and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Jing-Sheng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center, and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Hua-Ming Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center, and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Xu-Yao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center, and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhi-Yong Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife Center, and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lambrecht ML, Eaton DJ, Sonke JJ, Nestle U, Peulen H, Weber DC, Verheij M, Hurkmans CW. Results of a multicentre dosimetry audit using a respiratory phantom within the EORTC LungTech trial. Radiother Oncol 2019; 138:106-113. [PMID: 31252291 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Revised: 06/06/2019] [Accepted: 06/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The EORTC 22113-08113 LungTech trial assesses the safety and efficacy of SBRT for centrally located NSCLC. To insure protocol compliance an extensive RTQA procedure was implemented. METHODS Twelve centres were audited using a CIRS008A phantom. The phantom was scanned using target inserts of 7.5 mm and 12.5 mm radius in static condition. For the 7.5 mm insert a 4DCT was acquired while moving according to a cos6 function. Treatment plans were measured using film and an ionization chamber. Wilcoxon's signed-rank tests were performed to compare the three plans across institutions. A Spearman correlation was calculated to evaluate the influence of factors such as PTV, slice thickness and total number of monitor units on the dosimetric results. RESULTS The reference output dose median [min, max] variation was 0.5% [-1.1, +1.5]. The median deviations between chamber doses and point-planned doses were 1.8% [-0.1; 6.7] for the 7.5 mm and 1.1% [-2.8; 5.0] for the 12.5 mm sphere in static situation and 3.2% [-3.2; 15.7] for the dynamic situation. Film gamma median pass rates were 92.0% [68.0, 99.0] for 7.5 mm static, 96.2% [73.0, 99.0] for 12.5 mm static and 71.0% [40.0, 99.0] for 7.5 mm dynamic. Wilcoxon's signed-rank tests showed that the dynamic irradiations resulted in significantly lower gamma pass rates compared to the 12.5 mm static plan (p = 0.001). The total number of MUs per plan was correlated to both film and IC results. CONCLUSION An end-to-end audit was successfully performed, revealing important variations between institutions especially in dynamic irradiations. This shows the importance of dosimetry audits and the potentials for further technique and methodology improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Lara Lambrecht
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - David J Eaton
- Radiotherapy Trials QA Group, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, United Kingdom
| | - Jan-Jakob Sonke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherland Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, KlinikenMaria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Heike Peulen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Marcel Verheij
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherland Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Coen W Hurkmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Freedman JN, Bainbridge HE, Nill S, Collins DJ, Kachelrieß M, Leach MO, McDonald F, Oelfke U, Wetscherek A. Synthetic 4D-CT of the thorax for treatment plan adaptation on MR-guided radiotherapy systems. Phys Med Biol 2019; 64:115005. [PMID: 30844775 PMCID: PMC8208601 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab0dbb] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2018] [Revised: 01/04/2019] [Accepted: 03/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
MR-guided radiotherapy treatment planning utilises the high soft-tissue contrast of MRI to reduce uncertainty in delineation of the target and organs at risk. Replacing 4D-CT with MRI-derived synthetic 4D-CT would support treatment plan adaptation on hybrid MR-guided radiotherapy systems for inter- and intrafractional differences in anatomy and respiration, whilst mitigating the risk of CT to MRI registration errors. Three methods were devised to calculate synthetic 4D and midposition (time-weighted mean position of the respiratory cycle) CT from 4D-T1w and Dixon MRI. The first approach employed intensity-based segmentation of Dixon MRI for bulk-density assignment (sCTD). The second step added spine density information using an atlas of CT and Dixon MRI (sCTDS). The third iteration used a polynomial function relating Hounsfield units and normalised T1w image intensity to account for variable lung density (sCTDSL). Motion information in 4D-T1w MRI was applied to generate synthetic CT in midposition and in twenty respiratory phases. For six lung cancer patients, synthetic 4D-CT was validated against 4D-CT in midposition by comparison of Hounsfield units and dose-volume metrics. Dosimetric differences found by comparing sCTD,DS,DSL and CT were evaluated using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p = 0.05). Compared to sCTD and sCTDS, planning on sCTDSL significantly reduced absolute dosimetric differences in the planning target volume metrics to less than 98 cGy (1.7% of the prescribed dose) on average. When comparing sCTDSL and CT, average radiodensity differences were within 97 Hounsfield units and dosimetric differences were significant only for the planning target volume D99% metric. All methods produced clinically acceptable results for the organs at risk in accordance with the UK SABR consensus guidelines and the LungTech EORTC phase II trial. The overall good agreement between sCTDSL and CT demonstrates the feasibility of employing synthetic 4D-CT for plan adaptation on hybrid MR-guided radiotherapy systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua N Freedman
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- CR UK Cancer Imaging Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah E Bainbridge
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Simeon Nill
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - David J Collins
- CR UK Cancer Imaging Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Marc Kachelrieß
- Medical Physics in Radiology, The German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin O Leach
- CR UK Cancer Imaging Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed
| | - Fiona McDonald
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Uwe Oelfke
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andreas Wetscherek
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Significant advances have been made in the field of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for the treatment of pulmonary neoplasms in recent years. This review aims to summarize recent salient evidence on SABR for early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC). RECENT FINDINGS In medically inoperable patients, SABR remains the standard of care. The optimal SABR dosing regimen is being studied. Comparisons with non-SABR radiotherapy regimens with lower doses per fraction revealed benefit of SABR. In operable patients, no prospective clinical trial comparing SABR and surgery has been completed, although multiple trials are currently underway to address this question. SABR is generally cost-effective and safe in most patients, with preserved patient-reported quality of life. However, increased toxicity with SABR is noted in patients with disease close to, or invading the proximal tracheobronchial tree. Significant SABR-related toxicity and mortality is also reported in patients with coexisting interstitial lung disease. Considerations on pathologic confirmation, surveillance and multiple primaries are also addressed. SUMMARY SABR is an effective and safe treatment for inoperable ES-NSCLC. Ongoing trials and comparative effectiveness research will help to clarify SABR's role in various lung cancer indications going forward.
Collapse
|
33
|
Abel S, Hasan S, Horne ZD, Colonias A, Wegner RE. Stereotactic body radiation therapy in early-stage NSCLC: historical review, contemporary evidence and future implications. Lung Cancer Manag 2019; 8:LMT09. [PMID: 31044018 PMCID: PMC6488937 DOI: 10.2217/lmt-2018-0013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2018] [Accepted: 01/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinical use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has increased dramatically over the last 2 decades and is the current standard-of-care in cases of inoperable early stage non-small-cell lung cancer. While surgical resection remains the standard-of-care for operable patients, several ongoing clinical trials are investigating the role of SBRT in these operative candidates as well. Taking into consideration the expanding role and utility of SBRT, this paper will: review the historical basis of SBRT; examine landmark trials establishing the framework for the current body of evidence; discuss areas of active and future research; and identify epidemiological trends that are likely to further increase the use of SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Abel
- Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Division of Radiation Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, 15212, USA
| | - Shaakir Hasan
- Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Division of Radiation Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, 15212, USA
| | - Zachary D Horne
- Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Division of Radiation Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, 15212, USA
| | - Athanasios Colonias
- Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Division of Radiation Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, 15212, USA
| | - Rodney E Wegner
- Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Division of Radiation Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, 15212, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Stam B, Kwint M, Guckenberger M, Mantel F, Hope A, Giuliani M, Werner-wasik M, Grills I, Sonke J, Belderbos J. Subgroup Survival Analysis in Stage I-II NSCLC Patients With a Central Tumor Partly Treated With Risk-Adapted SBRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 103:132-41. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.08.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2017] [Revised: 06/12/2018] [Accepted: 08/24/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
35
|
Lambrecht M, Sonke JJ, Nestle U, Peulen H, Weber DC, Verheij M, Hurkmans CW. Quality assurance of four-dimensional computed tomography in a multicentre trial of stereotactic body radiotherapy of centrally located lung tumours. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2018; 8:57-62. [PMID: 33458418 PMCID: PMC7807606 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2018] [Revised: 10/25/2018] [Accepted: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose Extensive radiation therapy quality assurance (RTQA) programs are needed when advanced radiotherapy treatments are used. As part of the RTQA four dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) imaging performance needs to be assessed. Here we present the RTQA data related to 4DCT procedures used within the context of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of centrally located lung tumours. It provides an overview of the 4DCT acquisition methods and achievable accuracy of imaging lung tumour volumes. Materials and Methods 3DCT and 4DCT images were acquired from a CIRS phantom with spheres of 7.5 and 12.5 mm radius using the institutional scan protocols. Regular asymmetric tumour motion was simulated with varying amplitudes and periods. Target volumes were reconstructed using auto-contouring with scanner specific thresholds. Volume and amplitudes deviations were assessed. Results Although acquisition parameters were rather homogeneous over the eleven institutions analysed, volume deviations were observed. Average volume deviations for the 12.5 mm sphere were 15% (−4% to 69%) at end of inspiration, 2% (−2% to 9.0%) at end of expiration and 12% (0% to 36%) at mid-ventilation. For the 7.5 mm sphere deviations were 13% (−99% to 65%), 16% (−34% to 66%) and 1% (−13% to 20%), respectively. The amplitude deviation was generally within 2 mm although underestimations up to 6 mm were observed. Conclusions The expiration phase was the most accurate phase to define the tumour volume and should be preferred for GTV delineation of tumours exhibiting large motion causing motion artefacts when using mid-ventilation or tracking techniques. The large variation found among the institutions indicated that further improvements in 4DCT imaging were possible. Recommendations for 4DCT QA have been formulated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Lambrecht
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Jakob Sonke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherland Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Heike Peulen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Marcel Verheij
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherland Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Coen W Hurkmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy is the technique of accurately delivering high doses of radiotherapy to small volume targets in a single or small number of sessions. The high biological effective dose of this treatment is reflected in the high rates of local control achieved across multiple tumour sites. Toxicity of the treatment can be significant and ongoing prospective trials will help define the utility of this treatment as an alternative to surgery in treating primary tumours and oligometastatic disease. Longer follow-up and survival data from prospective trials will be essential in determining the value of this resource-intensive treatment. The opportunity to combine this treatment with systemic therapies and its potential synergy with immunotherapy opens up interesting avenues for research in the future.
Collapse
|
37
|
Chen H, Tikkanen J, Boldt RG, Louie AV. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for early-stage lung cancer following double lung transplantation. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:142. [PMID: 30086765 PMCID: PMC6081952 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1089-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2018] [Accepted: 07/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Development of primary lung cancer in donor lung post-lung transplantation is very rare, with few described cases. The safety of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for early-stage lung cancer arising from donor lung is unclear. CASE PRESENTATION Herein, we present a case of a patient with a Stage IB adenocarcinoma arising from donor lung 8 years post-double lung transplantation, which was performed due to advanced emphysema. The patient was ineligible for surgical management due to chronic lung allograft dysfunction, which significantly compromised pulmonary function. Full dose SABR was delivered with curative intent after a discussion with the patient. The patient tolerated the treatment well, with one episode of subacute toxicity that resolved with treatment. There was no evidence of recurrence at 15 months post-treatment and the patient's pulmonary function did not deviate from the pre-SABR baseline. CONCLUSIONS SABR appears feasible for medically-inoperable early-stage primary lung adenocarcinoma in the setting of previous double-lung transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanbo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, 790 Commissioners Road East, London, ON, N6A 4L6, Canada
| | - Jussi Tikkanen
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada
| | - R Gabriel Boldt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, 790 Commissioners Road East, London, ON, N6A 4L6, Canada
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, 790 Commissioners Road East, London, ON, N6A 4L6, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Yahya S, Ghafoor Q, Stevenson R, Watkins S, Allos B. Evolution of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer and Birmingham's (UK) Experience. Medicines (Basel) 2018; 5:medicines5030077. [PMID: 30041469 PMCID: PMC6163903 DOI: 10.3390/medicines5030077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Revised: 07/20/2018] [Accepted: 07/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has taken a pivotal role in early lung cancer management particularly in the medically inoperable patients. Retrospective studies have shown this to be well tolerated with comparable results to surgery and no significant increase in toxicity. Paucity of randomized evidence has dictated initiation of several trials to provide good quality evidence to steer future practice. This review summaries salient developments in lung SABR, comparisons to surgery and other platforms and our local experience at University Hospitals Birmingham, UK of lung SABR since its initiation in June 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sundus Yahya
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK.
| | - Qamar Ghafoor
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK.
| | - Robert Stevenson
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK.
| | - Steven Watkins
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK.
| | - Beshar Allos
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Chang JH, Poon I, Erler D, Zhang L, Cheung P. The safety and effectiveness of stereotactic body radiotherapy for central versus ultracentral lung tumors. Radiother Oncol 2018; 129:277-83. [PMID: 30049454 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2018] [Revised: 06/22/2018] [Accepted: 07/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Recent studies have postulated that patients undergoing lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for ultracentral tumors have higher toxicity and mortality rates than those with central tumors. Our aim was to compare the outcomes after lung SBRT for central versus ultracentral tumors in our own series. MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a retrospective review of patients with primary and metastatic lung tumors treated with SBRT from 1 September 2009 to 30 June 2015. Patients were included if they were treated with five-fraction SBRT to central or ultracentral tumors. Central tumors were defined as tumors where the closest point was within 2 cm of (but not abutting) the proximal bronchial tree, or within 2 cm of (whether abutting or not) mediastinal structures. Ultracentral tumors were defined as tumors abutting the proximal bronchial tree. The 2-year overall survival (OS), 2-year local failure (LF), and 2-year grade ≥3 toxicity rates were compared between patients with central and ultracentral tumors. RESULTS A total of 107 patients were included in this study. There were no significant differences in 2-year OS between the two groups, with 2-year OS 57.7% for central tumors, and 50.4% for ultracentral tumors (p = 0.10). There were no significant differences in 2-year LF between the two groups, with 2-year LF 3.4% for central tumors and 4.3% for ultracentral tumors (p = 0.92). There were no significant differences in 2-year grade ≥3 toxicity rate for the two groups, with 3.5% with central tumors and 8.7% with ultracentral tumors (p = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS There were no significant differences in OS, LF, or grade ≥3 toxicity between patients with central and ultracentral lung tumors. Although these results indicate that SBRT for ultracentral tumors may be safe, caution should be applied in selecting and treating these patients until the completion of large prospective trials.
Collapse
|
40
|
Wink KC, Roelofs E, Simone CB, Dechambre D, Santiago A, van der Stoep J, Dries W, Smits J, Avery S, Ammazzalorso F, Jansen N, Jelen U, Solberg T, de Ruysscher D, Troost EG. Photons, protons or carbon ions for stage I non-small cell lung cancer – Results of the multicentric ROCOCO in silico study. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:139-146. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.02.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2017] [Revised: 02/21/2018] [Accepted: 02/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
41
|
Wan Y, Huang J, Xu F. [Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Centrally Located Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi 2018; 21:413-418. [PMID: 29764593 PMCID: PMC5999925 DOI: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2018.05.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
A few study has proven that about 90% of local control rates might be benefit from stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with medically inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it is reported SBRT associated overall survival and tumor specific survival is comparable with those treated with surgery. SBRT has been accepted as the first line treatment for inoperable patients with peripheral located stage I NSCLC. However, the role of SBRT in centrally located lesions is controversial for potential toxic effects from the adjacent anatomical structure. This paper will review the definition, indication, dose regimens, dose-volume constraints for organs at risk, radiation technology, treatment side effect of centrally located NSCLC treated with SBRT and stereotactic body proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuming Wan
- Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Jing Huang
- Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Feng Xu
- Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kazemzadeh N, Modiri A, Samanta S, Yan Y, Bland R, Rozario T, Wibowo H, Iyengar P, Ahn C, Timmerman R, Sawant A. Virtual Bronchoscopy-Guided Treatment Planning to Map and Mitigate Radiation-Induced Airway Injury in Lung SAbR. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 102:210-218. [PMID: 29891202 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.04.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2017] [Revised: 04/16/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiation injury to the bronchial tree is an important yet poorly understood potential side effect in lung stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SAbR). We investigate the integration of virtual bronchoscopy in radiation therapy planning to quantify dosage to individual airways. We develop a risk model of airway collapse and develop treatment plans that reduce the risk of radiation-induced airway injury. METHODS AND MATERIALS Pre- and post-SAbR diagnostic-quality computerized tomography (CT) scans were retrospectively collected from 26 lung cancer patients. From each scan, the bronchial tree was segmented using a virtual bronchoscopy system and registered deformably to the planning CT. Univariate and stepwise multivariate Cox regressions were performed, examining factors such as age, comorbidities, smoking pack years, airway diameter, and maximum point dosage (Dmax). Logistic regression was utilized to formulate a risk function of segmental collapse based on Dmax and diameter. The risk function was incorporated into the objective function along with clinical dosage volume constraints for planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs). RESULTS Univariate analysis showed that segmental diameter (P = .014) and Dmax (P = .007) were significantly correlated with airway segment collapse. Multivariate stepwise Cox regression showed that diameter (P = .015), Dmax (P < .0001), and pack/years of smoking (P = .02) were significant independent factors associated with collapse. Risk management-based plans enabled significant dosage reduction to individual airway segments while fulfilling clinical dosimetric objectives. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the first systematic investigation of functional avoidance in lung SAbR based on mapping and minimizing doses to individual bronchial segments. Our early results show that it is possible to substantially lower airway dosage. Such dosage reduction may potentially reduce the risk of radiation-induced airway injury, while satisfying clinically prescribed dosimetric objectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arezoo Modiri
- University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Santanu Samanta
- University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Yulong Yan
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Ross Bland
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | | | | | - Chul Ahn
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Amit Sawant
- University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Hegi F, D'Souza M, Azzi M, De Ruysscher D. Comparing the Outcomes of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy and Non-Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Definitive Radiotherapy Approaches to Thoracic Malignancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Lung Cancer 2018; 19:199-212. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2017.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2017] [Revised: 11/09/2017] [Accepted: 11/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
44
|
Giuliani M, Mathew AS, Bahig H, Bratman SV, Filion E, Glick D, Louie AV, Raman S, Swaminath A, Warner A, Yau V, Palma D. SUNSET: Stereotactic Radiation for Ultracentral Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer-A Safety and Efficacy Trial. Clin Lung Cancer 2018; 19:e529-e532. [PMID: 29759332 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2018.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2018] [Accepted: 04/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is considered a standard curative treatment for medically inoperable early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with ultracentral tumors (signifying tumors whose planning target volume touches or overlaps the central bronchial tree, esophagus, or pulmonary artery) may be at higher risk of serious toxicities such as bronchial stricture and collapse, esophageal strictures, tracheal-esophageal fistula, and hemorrhage. The primary objective of the study is to determine the maximum tolerated dose of radiotherapy for ultracentral NSCLC. METHODS This multicenter phase 1 dose-escalation study will use a time-to-event continual reassessment method (TITE-CRM). Accrual will start at level 1 (60 Gy in 8 fractions delivered daily). The model will use all available information from previously accrued patients to assign the highest dose with a predicted risk of grade 3-5 toxicity of 30% or less. All patients with newly diagnosed stage T1-3 N0M0 NSCLC (International Union Against Cancer, 8th edition) with tumor size ≤ 6 cm and meeting the criteria for ultracentral location (ie, tumors whose planning target volume touches or overlaps the central bronchial tree, esophagus, pulmonary vein, or pulmonary artery) will be eligible for this study. DISCUSSION It is important to identify a safe dose-fractionation regimen for treating ultracentral tumors with SBRT. In addition, the data from this study may be informative in guiding future studies on the use of SBRT in treating malignancies within the mediastinum-for example, for salvage treatment of mediastinal lymph nodes for recurrent NSCLC or mediastinal oligometastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meredith Giuliani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Ashwathy S Mathew
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Houda Bahig
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)-Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Scott V Bratman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Edith Filion
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)-Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Daniel Glick
- BC Cancer-Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Srinivas Raman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Andrew Warner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vivian Yau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Palma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Murrell DH, Laba JM, Erickson A, Millman B, Palma DA, Louie AV. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for ultra-central lung tumors: prioritize target coverage or organs at risk? Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:57. [PMID: 29606150 PMCID: PMC5880025 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1001-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2017] [Accepted: 03/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is associated with low morbidity, however there is an increased risk of treatment-related toxicity in tumors directly abutting or invading the proximal bronchial tree, termed ‘ultra-central’ tumors. As there is no consensus regarding the optimal radiotherapy treatment regimen for these tumors, we performed a modeling study to evaluate the trade-offs between predicted toxicity and local control for commonly used high-precision dose-fractionation regimens. Methods Ten patients with ultra-central lung tumors were identified from our institutional database. New plans were generated for 3 different hypofractionated schemes: 50 Gy in 5 fractions, 60 Gy in 8 fractions and 60 Gy in 15 fractions. For each regimen, one plan was created that prioritized planning target volume (PTV) coverage, potentially at the expense of organ at risk (OAR) tolerance, and a second that compromised PTV coverage to respect OAR dose constraints. Published radiobiological models were employed to evaluate competing treatment plans based on estimates for local control and the likelihood for toxicity to OAR. Results The risk of esophageal or pulmonary toxicity was low (< 5%) in all scenarios. When PTV coverage was prioritized, tumor control probabilities were 92.9% for 50 Gy in 5 fractions, 92.4% for 60 Gy in 8 fractions, and 52.0% for 60 Gy in 15 fractions; however the estimated risk of grade ≥ 4 toxicity to the proximal bronchial tree was 68%, 44% and 2% respectively. When dose to OAR was prioritized, the risk of major pulmonary toxicity was reduced to < 1% in all schemes, but this compromise reduced tumor control probability to 60.3% for 50 Gy in 5 fractions, 65.7% for 60 Gy in 8 fractions and 47.8% for 60 Gy in 15 fractions. Conclusions The tradeoff between local control and central airway toxicity are considerable in the use of 3 commonly used hypofractionated radiotherapy regimens for ultra-central lung cancer. The results of this planning study predict that the best balance may be achieved with 60 Gy in 8 fractions compromising PTV coverage as required to maintain acceptable doses to OAR. A prospective phase I trial (SUNSET) is planned to further evaluate this challenging clinical scenario. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-018-1001-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna H Murrell
- Department of Physics and Engineering, London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada
| | - Joanna M Laba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, 790 Commissioners Road East, London, ON, Canada
| | - Abigail Erickson
- Department of Physics and Engineering, London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada
| | - Barbara Millman
- Department of Physics and Engineering, London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada
| | - David A Palma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, 790 Commissioners Road East, London, ON, Canada
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, 790 Commissioners Road East, London, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Gkika E, Oehlke O, Bunea H, Wiedenmann N, Adebahr S, Nestle U, Zamboglou C, Kirste S, Fennell J, Brunner T, Gainey M, Baltas D, Langer M, Urbach H, Bock M, Meyer PT, Grosu AL. Biological imaging for individualized therapy in radiation oncology: part II medical and clinical aspects. Future Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.2217/fon-2017-0465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Positron emission tomography and multiparametric MRI provide crucial information concerning tumor extent and normal tissue anatomy. Moreover, they are able to visualize biological characteristics of the tumor, which can be considered in the radiation treatment planning and monitoring. In this review we discuss the impact of biological imaging positron emission tomography and multiparametric MRI for radiation oncology, based on the data of the literature and on the experience of our own institution in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| | - Oliver Oehlke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| | - Hatice Bunea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| | - Nicole Wiedenmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| | - Sonja Adebahr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| | - Jamina Fennell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| | - Thomas Brunner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| | - Mark Gainey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| | - Dimos Baltas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| | - Mathias Langer
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
| | - Horst Urbach
- Department of Neuroradiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
| | - Michael Bock
- Department of Radiology – Medical Physics, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
| | - Philipp T Meyer
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, D-79106, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, D-69120, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Donovan EK, Swaminath A. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the management of non-small-cell lung cancer: Clinical impact and patient perspectives. Lung Cancer (Auckl) 2018; 9:13-23. [PMID: 29588624 PMCID: PMC5859907 DOI: 10.2147/lctt.s129833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a new technology in radiotherapy delivery, allowing for potentially curative treatment in many patients previously felt not to be candidates for radical surgical resection of stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several studies have demonstrated very high local control rates using SBRT, and more recent data have suggested overall survival may approach that of surgery in operable patients. However, SBRT is not without unique toxicities, and the balance of toxicity, and effect on patient-reported quality of life need to be considered with respect to oncologic outcomes. We therefore aim to review SBRT in the context of important patient-related factors, including quality of life in several domains (and in comparison to other therapies such as conventional radiation, surgery, or no treatment). We will also describe scenarios in which SBRT may be reasonably offered (i.e. elderly patients and those with severe COPD), and where it may need to be approached with some caution due to increased risks of toxicity (i.e. tumor location, patients with interstitial lung disease). In total, we hope to characterize the physical, emotional, and functional consequences of SBRT, in relation to other management strategies, in order to aid the clinician in deciding whether SBRT is the optimal treatment choice for each patient with early stage NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elysia K Donovan
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Anand Swaminath
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
PURPOSE Hypofractionated radiation therapy (hRT) combined with immune checkpoint blockade can induce T-cell-mediated local and abscopal antitumor effects. We had previously observed peak levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) between days 5 and 8 after hRT. Because TILs are regarded as radiosensitive, hRT schedules extending into this period might be less immunogenic, prompting us to compare clinically relevant, short and extended schedules with equivalent biologically effective doses combined with anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD1) antibody treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS In mice bearing 2 B16-CD133 melanoma tumors, the primary tumor was irradiated with 3 × 9.18 Gy in 3 or 5 days or with 5 × 6.43 Gy in 10 days; an anti-PD1 antibody was given weekly. The mice were monitored for tumor growth and survival. T-cell responses were determined on days 8 and 15 of treatment. The role of regional lymph nodes was studied by administering FTY720, which blocks lymph node egress of activated T cells. Tumor growth measurements after combination treatment using short or extended hRT and control treatment were also performed in the wild-type B16 melanoma and 4T1 breast carcinoma models. RESULTS In the B16-CD133 model, growth inhibition of irradiated primary and nonirradiated secondary tumors and overall survival were similar with all 3 hRT/anti-PD1 combinations, superior to hRT and anti-PD1 monotherapy, and was strongly dependent on CD8+ T cells. TIL infiltration and local and systemic tumor-specific CD8+ T-cell responses were also similar, regardless of whether short or extended hRT was used. Administration of FTY720 accelerated growth of both primary and secondary tumors, strongly reduced their TIL infiltration, and increased tumor-specific CD8+ T cells in the lymph nodes draining the irradiated tumor. In the 4T1 model, local and abscopal tumor control was also similar, regardless of whether short or extended hRT was used, although the synergy between hRT and anti-PD1 was weaker. No synergies were found in the B16 wild-type model lacking an exogenous antigen. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that combination therapy with hRT schedules extending into the period during which treatment-induced T cells infiltrate the irradiated tumor can provoke local and systemic antitumor effects similar to those with therapy using shorter schedules, if the regional lymph nodes supply sufficient tumor-specific T cells. This has implications for planning clinical RT/immune checkpoint blockade trials.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Animals
- Antibodies/therapeutic use
- CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/cytology
- CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/drug effects
- CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology
- CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/radiation effects
- Combined Modality Therapy
- Fingolimod Hydrochloride/pharmacology
- Flow Cytometry
- Humans
- Immunosuppressive Agents/pharmacology
- Immunotherapy, Adoptive/methods
- Interferon-gamma/analysis
- Lymphocyte Activation/immunology
- Lymphocyte Activation/radiation effects
- Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating/cytology
- Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating/drug effects
- Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating/immunology
- Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating/radiation effects
- Melanoma, Experimental/immunology
- Melanoma, Experimental/mortality
- Melanoma, Experimental/pathology
- Melanoma, Experimental/radiotherapy
- Mice
- Mice, Inbred BALB C
- Mice, Inbred C57BL
- Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/immunology
- Radiation Dose Hypofractionation
- Relative Biological Effectiveness
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuanwei Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, partner site Freiburg, and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiao Tong University, Xi'an, Shaan Xi, People's Republic of China
| | - Gabriele Niedermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, partner site Freiburg, and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
|
50
|
Hanna GG, Murray L, Patel R, Jain S, Aitken KL, Franks KN, van As N, Tree A, Hatfield P, Harrow S, McDonald F, Ahmed M, Saran FH, Webster GJ, Khoo V, Landau D, Eaton DJ, Hawkins MA. UK Consensus on Normal Tissue Dose Constraints for Stereotactic Radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:5-14. [PMID: 29033164 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 157] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2017] [Revised: 09/07/2017] [Accepted: 09/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Six UK studies investigating stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) are currently open. Many of these involve the treatment of oligometastatic disease at different locations in the body. Members of all the trial management groups collaborated to generate a consensus document on appropriate organ at risk dose constraints. Values from existing but older reviews were updated using data from current studies. It is hoped that this unified approach will facilitate standardised implementation of SABR across the UK and will allow meaningful toxicity comparisons between SABR studies and internationally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G G Hanna
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, UK.
| | - L Murray
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds, UK
| | - R Patel
- National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | - S Jain
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - K L Aitken
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - K N Franks
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds, UK
| | - N van As
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A Tree
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - P Hatfield
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds, UK
| | - S Harrow
- Department of Radiotherapy, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - F McDonald
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - M Ahmed
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - F H Saran
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - G J Webster
- Department of Radiotherapy, Worcester Oncology Centre, Worcester, UK
| | - V Khoo
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - D Landau
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - D J Eaton
- National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | - M A Hawkins
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|